TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TooOldForThisShit642 Archive

View 0 posts and 694 comments by TooOldForThisShit642 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Don't know what a "keyboard warrior" is, but I definitely know it's incredibly insecure for a person to be pissed off at women due to their own failures.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/17 01:01 AM
1

I'm not wasting your time. You are. Come with a coherent argument if you want a debate. Or simply stop responding to me. That's an option too if you don't want to waste your own time.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/16 10:45 PM
1

You twerps love to say the "exception proves the rule", so...
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/16 10:17 PM
1

Imagine this, you read RP material. Rollo, Roosh, Roisy. Then the second gen stuff, illimitable men, the new Chateau heartsie, Archwinger, Ianwood. You lost me right there. No need to read the rest. I've read a little from most of those guys and quite honestly, I think it may have made me a little dumber.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/16 10:15 PM
1

Besides means that there are things you can be, besides hot, that will help you succeed with women. I'm not hot, yet I'm successful with women. Is you argument that I MUST be hot in order to be successful?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/16 08:44 PM
1

Do you only speak in non sequiturs or are you actually able to focus on a single conversation?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/16 08:41 PM
1

I edited a typo. But go ahead and extrapolate what you want from that. I'm sure you've got a deep understanding of my psyche and why I would do that. Go getum tiger, I'm sure your STEM degree and divorced mom gave you the tools to succeed. I look forward to the first field report on PPD from you, explaining how great you overcome some hardship in life with your wonderful tools What in the wide wide world of fuck are you even talking about? Do you mean my business degree and my parents who have b…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/16 05:13 PM
1

Well, maybe she's the female equivalent of a "cuck". You're using the "No True Scotsman" fallacy. No "real man" would want that. But all women would? Come on. You're not even trying.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/16 03:03 PM
1

I'm telling you I don't give a shit about the replication issue in the soft sciences. I'm not here to debate the soft sciences. But you wanting to confirm your bias in everything you see doesn't make your bias any more accurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/16 03:01 PM
1

Well, that can be argued, but that's not what I said. I wasn't talking about sex drive. I clearly said fidelity. What is the difference between a man wanting fidelity from a woman and a woman wanting fidelity from a man? And don't say paternity. That's a cop out answer. People end relationships over cheating even when a pregnancy doesn't occur.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/16 02:51 PM
1

You guys seem to think that everything confirms your bias. But that's beside the point. I'm not saying this study is accurate or even high quality. I'm simply saying that there isn't a difference between men and women when it comes to a desire for fidelity in the context of a monogamous relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/16 02:48 PM
3

Men and women in monogamous relationships want the same thing. Fidelity. And according to this study, a higher count is an indicator of infidelity. So I'm not really seeing the difference. What's the difference in what men want and what women want in regards to fidelity?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/16 01:02 PM
1

because average men can't be picky You seem to think that average men have to just accept whatever shitty relationship comes their way because it's either that, or being alone forever. That's not the reality for most guys. she doesn't really need to bring anything else, as long as she's thin and pretty If that's all that matters, you're pretty much guaranteeing a crappy relationship. Maybe that's the way inexperienced guys think, but that's why they're bound to get burned. Guys who actually like…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 11:01 PM
2

Female power in the relationship is a given. We all know that most women can find a guy willing to date or fuck them without that much trouble. There's always that unspoken threat hanging in the air that if the guy doesn't measure up or keep her happy, she'll have no problem leaving and replacing him. That leads to an unspoken relationship standard where it's the guy's duty to please the princess. And a continued relationship, maybe with occasional sex solely on her terms and timetable, is his r…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 10:52 PM
9

You've been around long enough to never underestimate a terps ability to see the worst in women.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 10:42 PM
6

25? Dude. Have some self respect. 21 at the oldest. And a virgin, obviously. Who loves giving blow jobs. But has never done it. And model-hot for sure. Anything less than that and you're a cuck. Duh.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 10:40 PM
1

Take men to court and fight over the child out of spite, making false accusations in order to gain leverage. Essentially, keeping the child in order to get as much money as possible. Her lies and her lawyer's tactics may have been a bit extreme, but it was that the court allowed this to happen is what keeps the shock fresh. You say this like it happens in most cases. This isn't a common occurance. At all. Your paranoia is showing. assistance the government has already promised its citizens. It's…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 09:25 PM
1

women tend to look more towards personality than men though. I'll agree with that. But to me that only goes to show that women will find more guys attractive. Not less. And when it comes to deal breakers, men and women are both capable of having ridiculous ones. "He doesn't drive the right car." "She admits to pooping." Blah blah blah. I think those ridiculous deal breakers usually stem from a fear of getting into a relationship at all. If you can find any reason not to keep dating that person, …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 08:17 PM
1

Average men have difficulty getting laid with average women. cause average women demand above average men. Everyone wants to find the most attractive person possible. That's not at all unique to women. You prove it with this comment... I want him to get laid often with thin, pretty women You think that attractive women are more valuable than unattractive ones. Why wouldn't women think the same about men? Just because you're not one of the more attractive ones, doesn't make women more wrong than …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 08:09 PM
3

I don't really buy the theory that men are easier on women when it comes to looks. I think both men and women have the potential to be incredibly discerning when it comes to looks, but I don't agree at all that women have higher standards. Anyway, agree to disgree.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 07:38 PM
1

The director of this entire agency is a woman, and I have yet to be "laughed out of the building". In fact, many of the co-workers here who are aware of my situation agree with my generalizations, because it has been true to their experience, too. Well, you don't work with the high-achieving women that i do. Rapport or not, even hinting at the fact you think women don't like to work would get not go well for you. Nor should it. Because it would be 1000% false. It sounds like maybe the women you …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 07:35 PM
2

Average men have difficulty getting laid. Not really. If I spawned a Chad, I would be proud, because it takes a lot of work and fantastic genes to pull it off. What work would it take? And if you had the "fantastic genes" to spawn a "Chad", wouldn't you have been able to get laid? She'd be attracted to Chad's and other assholes. I don't want those guys to use my genetic legacy as a cum dump, disgusts me to my core. Why do you assume that all "Chads" are assholes? Sounds like you suffer from "Nic…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 06:21 PM
1

A 4 can add a couple points if they dress a little nicer and apply just enough makeup to not look clown, but a "Real Housewives" makeover is not in the same ballpark as that.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 06:07 PM
1

This weakens the strength of your anecdote off the bat; you're in an elite and unique circumstance that the vast majority of the world cannot observe in their own lives. Disagree completely. This weakens yours. You claim that women do not have the desire to work. Yet, I'm surrounded by thousands of women who love working. None of them thought, "well, now that I'm graduating, it's time to find a man to take care of me." Which is what you think women say. None of my coworkers would be in this "eli…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 05:47 PM
2

I'm not so sure. It definitely sounds like you'd be jealous of your son and bitter that you missed out on something you think was important. Your daughter would be your spawn too, but for some reason you want her to be horribly ugly and never get the chance to date. Simply because you want her to have the same experience you did. When it comes down to it, you'll probably want the same for your son.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 04:58 PM
1

You take a 4, add the Real Housewives hair, make-up, derma fillers, botox and the rest of the hot chick costume and voilà... she now she looks like a 9 from across the restaurant. That's what I was responding to. I don't watch them either, but everyone has at least some awareness of what those people are like and their over-the-top style. So in my opinion, a 4 who has the same style as the crazy narcissistic reality show types gets a deduction. They sure as shit don't become a 9.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 04:54 PM
1

If they look anything like the women on Real Housewives, then it's overdone and ugly.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 03:31 PM
2

Different strokes, I guess. Personally I think the huge hair, botox and pancake makeup is incredibly fucking unattractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 03:28 PM
2

Doesn't sound like it. Kinda sounds like you'd be pissed off if your boys got more action than you did at their age.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 03:26 PM
1

And yet, more attractive women end up with less attractive men than vice versa. And often times, because attractive people make more money in general, those women out earn their husbands. So...
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 03:25 PM
6

If we're using anecdotes as evidence then my "facts" say the complete opposite. I work for a company that's just outside of the Fortune 100 and has nearly 30,000 employees worldwide. Nearly two thirds of the people I work with are women. Including more than half of the executives. I would love to see you tell these women that they don't really want to be working because of their biology. Would be hilarious to see them laugh you out of the building. Perhaps you're going for the wrong type of woma…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 03:16 PM
4

Ugh. You're calling your opinion facts now? Please tell me you're not basing your opinion on that silly OKC survey.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 02:22 PM
4

Your daughter doesn't get to enjoy sex or dating because you didn't. Also, you hope she's horribly ugly. Man. It's probably best if you don't have kids if that's your attitude.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 01:48 PM
8

Women are bad, however they're also bad. Got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 01:46 PM
5

That's a pretty broad generalization that women don't want to work. Do you have any data to back that up? How many women who graduate college never enter the workforce?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 01:44 PM
6

You would disown your daughter because you couldn't get laid in college? That's....sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 01:01 PM
2

Okay, Captain Taliban.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 01:00 PM
10

So, women are bad, however they're also bad?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 12:53 PM
1

add the Real Housewives hair, make-up, derma fillers, botox and the rest That would make her a 2. You find all that stuff attractive?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 12:52 PM
6

Women don't want to work, so they go into BB mode as graduation nears. What?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 12:47 PM
1

So you agree women have different taste and there are things besides being hot that can help you be successful with them?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/16 11:15 PM
1

Don't get all testy just because I pointed out how silly you sound.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/16 10:54 PM
1

So, what you're saying is all women are the same and if you're not hot then you're fucked? Seriously?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/16 10:08 PM
1

they don't like dumb You said that advice was counterproductive. Meaning you don't agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/16 09:14 PM
1

See? You're speaking in terms of women being a monolithic group without personal preferences. Pretending to be dumb because you think that's what women want has got to be some of the worst advice I've ever seen.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/16 09:03 PM
1

So.... what's your point? You're speculating that cultures that restrict sexuality might have kicked the asses of cultures that didn't? You're guessing that free cultures are hippies or something? You're not making much sense. Lots of "mights" and "maybes", but no real point.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/16 07:31 PM
1

Most reports are obviously made up. But what helped you, bettering yourself, is hardly unique to terps. That's common sense advice you see all over. Be healthier. Be interesting. Play to your strengths. TRP didn't invent those concepts. They just repackaged them with a hefty dose of bitterness.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/16 07:25 PM
1

Huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/16 03:14 PM
1

Doesn't everyone?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/16 12:02 PM
1

It doesn't really work though. If it did, there wouldn't be so many posts from terps begging for advice or posting fake field reports.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/16 09:41 PM
1

Exactly. Women don't give a shit about that. Running groups? Absolutely. How much a guy benches? Nope. Only guys care.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/16 01:23 PM
2

Blue pill is just making fun of the stupid shit TRP says. Nobody is worried about "success". If more terps were successful with women, there wouldn't be so many posts begging for advice on how to be successful with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/16 01:42 AM
2

Women tend to like fit guys. They don't want to talk about how fit.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/16 01:39 AM
1

What's a tumblr?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/16 10:49 PM
1

TRP isnt gay Debatable.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/16 10:42 PM
1

Say to a woman, "I bench 300 pounds". See if she gives a shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/16 10:20 PM
2

Does that mean women's magazines are geared towards lesbians? Even if all the relationship advice is geared towards straight women? A healthy looking man on the cover of a men's health magazine isn't gay. Don't be so sensitive.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/16 10:18 PM
1

Nirvana is red pill? How do you figure?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/16 09:20 PM
2

I'm not a reader of the magazine, but I'm pretty sure it is geared towards straight men, considering the "Sex & Women" section.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/16 09:17 PM
2

Women don't really care about the 300 pounds. Only other guys care that someone can bench 300 pounds.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/16 09:04 PM
2

But if you're talking about attractiveness alone, then who cares about having children or dating? Your assertion is that 80% of men are unattractive and 80% of woman are attractive. What does that have to do what age dates more?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/16 07:02 PM
1

But those girls who date 30 or 40 year olds are such a small number. Why get worked up about them?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/16 03:10 PM
2

But those guys aren't going after girls still in college. Or if they are, you'd definitely have to wonder why. It's one thing to pursue a recent college grad, it's another thing entirely for a 40 year old to try to date girls still in school. But as you say, that's a generally small group.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/16 03:07 PM
2

Cream of the crop 40 year olds are not going after college girls. Perhaps recent college grads, but not girls still in school. Perhaps I'm alone in this, but if a 40 year is dating girls still in college, he's automatically out of consideration for "cream of the crop" status.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/16 02:49 PM
2

40 year olds going after college girls have less success than short college-age guys. They're not really your competition.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/16 12:55 PM
1

You said the woman is always responsible for being a single mother. But if a man leaves his family, then he is responsible for her being a single mother. Can't have it both ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/16 03:04 AM
1

But then it's not the fault of the woman. The blame shifts to the man. As you said, he cannot be forced to feel responsible so he leaves his family. He's at fault for the single mother.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/16 02:08 AM
1

That's all you got? Oh boy. Talk about selective reading. You ignore everything I said and make a failed argument by misinterpreting the difference between "below average" and "unattractive". Below average=/=unattractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/16 10:09 PM
2

That wasn't me being hostile. Just disagreeing with your post.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/16 04:47 PM
2

You specifically said "love". That is why people are arguing with you. If you didn't mean "love" then don't use that word. It has a very specific meaning. It if were, infidelity would be a much smaller issue. No. That's you assuming people are saying sex is always meaningless. And no one would ever say that. Sex absolutely can be meaningless. If the two people having sex are simply doing it for the physical act and no one else, such as a spouse, is effected, then absolutely it can be meaningless…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/16 03:58 PM
4

Here too, one sees that there are very few people who are consistently rated as being above average or below average. Did you even read your link? It showed that there is no standard for attractiveness. It said absolutely nothing about rating 80% of men as unattractive. Got a real source to back your claim? Religion, restriction of female sexuality, feminism ban Go live in an Islamic nation if that's what you're looking for. Unrestricted female sexuality is a sign of a civilization downfall. Sou…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/16 03:51 PM
2

Except for the fact that some women see it as a sport and some men see it as a vetting process. Men and women trend differently, but that doesn't make them all that different. Especially since you can provide a solid argument for why they're different.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/16 03:42 PM
3

Sex is never fully separated from feelings, but there are plenty of feelings besides love. So your cheating point is completely invalid.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/16 03:16 PM
5

Women rate 80 percent of men as unattractive anyway, there is no pleasing them. No, the small number of women who were asked a question on an OKC survey rated 80% of men as "below average". So we might as well just make it that women never taste Chad dick in the first place. How do you propose doing that? That's what's got us here, at least. Where exactly? Women will probably choose to be in Chad harems with beta 80-percenters cucking through the taxes, if given the freedom. What int he wide wid…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/16 02:51 PM
2

That's why i said it's up to the speaker to prove their credibility. A person who makes observations of relationships AND has had relationships of their own, will generally be more credible than someone who has only observed other people in relationships. At least when it comes to providing insights.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/16 07:10 PM
3

Well, a stopped clock is right twice a day, doesn't mean it's not broken. But okay, going with your analogy, let's say you have never seen the sky. You want to know the color. You have someone who also has never seen the sky and someone who has. Which one are you going to ask?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/16 06:17 PM
2

It's also absurd to think that the good advice is something only the red pill has figured out. The things that have worked for guys is just common relationship advice repackaged to be mancentric.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/16 02:31 PM
4

Not really. It's the speaker's responsibility to establish their credibility. It's not on the listener to assume credibility until proven otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/16 02:13 PM
1

To some guys she's a slut simply because she won't fuck them. Doesn't matter if she's fucking other guys or not. But a lot of guys are idiots.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/16 01:43 PM
1

Only you can answer that for yourself. There isn't a definitive answer. So I'm wondering what YOU consider a lot. Each person has a different definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/16 01:27 PM
3

Better for a relationship? Yeah.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/16 01:24 PM
1

Define "a lot".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/16 05:11 AM
1

You need to provide some sort of argument before people can argue for or against your position. You don't say why you think that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/16 12:30 AM
3

But fucking every guy would be exhausting. Not to mention time consuming. If sluts were each fucking 3.5 billion guys they wouldn't even have time to leave the house. They guys would all just have to show up at their designated time. And I have yet hear about guys getting invites to be the sloppy 3.5 billioniths.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/16 12:28 AM
2

Just not with him. So you're more of a slutty slut apparently.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/16 12:21 AM
6

Quadruple anal? Now you're just making things up. But triple anal? Totally a thing. It's the new double anal. Which is boring now that every girl has obviously done that. They'll just never do double or triple anal with their beta provider! Those sluts!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/16 12:19 AM
7

See option C. She didn't want to lead you on. She could tell you had a crush on her.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/16 09:07 AM
1

First time you and I have ever agreed on anything. That really is the dumbest shit ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/16 11:05 PM
1

My whole point is that twerps use "cunt" as a generic insult for any woman who doesn't fit their limited view of the ideal woman. You proceeded to agree that those women who don't fit are "miserable cunts". I didn't have to try. You did all the work for me. Thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/16 11:03 PM
1

Fuckers even expect me to protect women I have never met just because I'm standing next to them in line or something. What in the wide wide world of fuck are you talking about? What kind of lines are you standing in that people are expecting you to protect women? Are you willing to admit that women DO need different doctors than men? Even though you claimed they go to the same ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/16 05:18 PM
3

Quite the victim complex you have there, chap. But your original point was that men and women are exactly the same and don't need different doctors. Willing to admit you're wrong now?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/16 04:59 PM
3

Men can't go to doctors? I mean, I know a lot of men refuse to, but I wasn't aware that it's a rule. Why don't doctors tell men they're not allowed?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/16 04:47 PM
3

Do women also need a different sort of doctors because women are so different from men? Do you go to a gynecologist?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/16 04:20 PM
1

The only person who is angry here from the looks of it is you. Ahh. The old "I know you are but what am I?" Defense. A classic on the school yards around the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/16 07:36 AM
1

miserable cunt" is used as a generic insult; not a criticism of women who have high-value attributes. You're still making my point. It's not a criticism of "women who have high-value attributes." But women who don't have what TRP consider "high-value attributes"? Well, they're just "miserable cunts", aren't they?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/16 07:34 AM
2

TRP isn't actual teaching. It's a place for angry men to bitch about women and post fantasies called "field reports". There's some terps who post unoriginal content about bettering yourself, but it's still wrapped in anger and self esteem issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/16 10:43 PM
1

TIL not being a doormat = high maintenance
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/16 10:40 PM
2

TRP Has plenty of guys who are just angry. It's not just a phase.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/16 08:37 PM
2

We get to the bar and I order our drinks and I put my hand on her thigh and she tells me not to put my hand there. I thought WTF? I casually put my hand on your thigh while we're sitting down on a date and you freak out? And I'm more attractive than you? Stupid fucking cunt. https://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/5bpusz/frdate_annoyed_me_so_i_covertly_got_another_chick/ Gentlemen, we will soon make more men, the actually valuable humans, without these miserable cunts. https://www.reddit.co…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/16 08:10 PM
1

No. Women who responded to a OKC survey said that 80% of the photos they were shown were of below average looking men. It said absolutely nothing about being beneath them. In fact, it said they were more likely to message those men than men were to message women they found below average looking. You can't exactly apply that stupid survey to all women.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/16 07:33 PM
4

TRP has a habit of calling women deeply flawed if they don't fit a very specific type. Any girl who has the audacity to want to be more than a fuck toy is a "feminist" and a "cunt". No amount of hamstering on your part is going to change that.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/16 04:59 PM
1

How is that circular? Part of what makes a woman high quality is that in addition to being successful, intelligent and attractive, she's confident enough to not allow herself to be treated like shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/16 11:43 AM
1

What PC? Women and men are human? I wasn't aware that's a politically correct way of thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/16 11:40 AM
11

The point is the TRP sees women as only flawed.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/16 11:24 AM
3

On the one hand, he's the Most Interesting Man in the World. On the other hand, he has shitty taste in beer. Could go either if, you know, he wasn't a fictional character.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/16 05:56 PM
1

Acts of kindness are only a small part of likability. I live my life in a way that both improves and makes life a little easier for the people I care about. Parents, family, friends. They know they can count on me no matter what. But furthermore, I can do things for them they don't see coming. That's why I'm considered a "good man". But there are plenty of people who genuinely like me even though I've never done anything for them that took any real effort. They're not in that group of people who…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 12:26 PM
2

Why would a woman who knows she's high quality enough to not put up with bullshit automatically be a "feminazi"? That's a seriously flawed and "beta" way of thinking. It's more that she has abundance mentality. A woman who knows she's desirable and has options, but chooses you because you're also high quality is the woman you want. Not a woman who will put up with your bullshit because she doesn't have the same qualities that you possess. I have no desire to be with a woman who thinks I'm better…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 12:14 PM
2

Good on you. Nothing worse than a soul sucking job. Honestly I hate even using the phrase "lowering standards" for that reason. Just hang out with who you want and fuck what other people think about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 11:17 AM
1

What do you consider a "slut"?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 11:14 AM
1

"Higher quality" means a woman who doesn't put up with sexist shit and doesn't feel the need to prove her worth to anyone. Successful, intelligent, attractive, sure. But the attitude is what makes her high quality. A woman who lets you treat her like shit is not high quality.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 11:12 AM
1

Well my personal experiences tells a different story completely. My altruism exceeds my attractiveness and I've never had a problem getting laid with women who would objectively be considered out of my league. I'm not hideous, but I would never be considered hot. But because women consider me a "good man" and my likability carries me a long way, I've dated and had ONSs with plenty of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 11:08 AM
1

Sexist attitudes and pedestal attitudes have different outcomes when it comes to lower quality women. But the same when it comes to high quality women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 11:02 AM
8

several women are going to chime in and say Yes, and several women won't have a response at all because they don't disagree. It's almost as if NAWALT, or something. What SOME women say and what SOME women do are two different things FTFY. And it's not like men are any different. We're all human after all.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 11:00 AM
1

So then as a follow up, are we (you) defining "slut" as a negative? Personally, I have met plenty of promiscuous women who are completely faithful in the context of a relationship, so one of the biggest red pill arguments against them doesn't hold much water.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 10:52 AM
1

The less attractive one usually. Doesn't matter if it's the guy or the girl. Then again, in my case, my girlfriend is way better looking and she's the one who pushed for an exclusive relationship. So it's never a hard and fast rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 09:49 AM
1

Then how are you defining a "slut"? Some people say it's a girl without standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 09:35 AM
1

Depends on how you define a LTR. Easier to have sex with a girl after a few dates where you're both trying to figure out if a relationship is worth pursuing? Or the real deal, calling each other boyfriend/girlfriend and meeting the family type of thing. The former is easy. The latter less so. And a ONS falls in the middle of those two.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 09:32 AM
2

I don't think red pill vs non-red pill makes any difference at all. Some guys will lower their standards and some guys won't. Period. There are red pill guys who say fuck any girl who will fuck you, just to increase your count. Because that's allegedly how you increase you value. And even if you want to give TRP the benefit of the doubt that it's solely about improving yourself and maximizing you SMV, there are still plenty of guys who will top out at 5 or 6. So that 3 or 4 girl isn't what they'…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 09:23 AM
3

There are a lot of things wrong with it, but I think one of the biggest problems with guys using that rating system, which obviously is very subjective, is that they start to concern themselves with what OTHER guys would rate a girl. He might think she's a 7, but if his "bros" think she's a 4, then he talks himself out of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 09:12 AM
2

They probably buy all of their food at Walmart.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 09:05 AM
1

they must be good relationships NO ONE EVER SAID THIS! You're missing the point. Everyone knows that some relationships are good and some are bad. You're arguing the way a feminist argues.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/16 03:39 PM
0

Your username checks out. I feel the same way. You know, you really need to work on your reading comprehension. Here. Let me help you. "The fact that a man has a woman in his life doesn't mean that his relationship with her is happy, that she loves him, that she respects him, or that she even cares about him." You read that as many times as it takes for you to understand it. Nor does it mean that she doesn't. No matter how much you want that to be true, it's not. So I guess the debate is over. S…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/16 03:30 PM
1

Okay, well you're choosing to focus on your feelings instead of debating the point I made.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/16 03:01 PM
1

So we're going to deflect now?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/16 02:49 PM
2

I read what you said. A woman will absolutely reject a man she's attracted to. Did you even read what I said? She might be nicer about it, because she thinks he's attractive, but that doesn't mean she won't reject him. Do you really believe that married women, or women in relationships, or lesbians (who absolutely can think a man is attractive) won't reject an attractive man? They're all willing to fuck him just because he's attractive? That's crazy-pants.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/16 02:43 PM
3

What are you talking about? You're changing your argument now. Your OP said that blues claim ALL relationships are good. That was your whole reason for creating this stupid post. Yes, all kinds of average men are in relationships. Most, in fact. That says absolutely nothing about whether they're good or bad relationships. What's your argument here? I'm not sure you even know, since you keep changing it every time someone asks you for evidence or your claim or completely refutes your bullshit. Ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/16 02:40 PM
2

It's like you're trying to be a wrong as possible. She might respond MORE favorably, but it's absolutely no guarantee he won't be rejected. Do you really believe that attractive men never get rejected? Or that a women in a relationship, or a lesbian, only rejects a man because he's unattractive? Come on man. That's incredibly stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/16 02:37 PM
2

But you have absolutely no idea if he's getting blown out because they think he's unattractive. She could be married, or dating someone already. She could be a lesbian. He could have said something stupid. There are tons or reasons besides attraction that people get rejected. Good looking guys get rejected too.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/16 02:26 PM
1

There are a lot of ways to be a shitty husband that don't involve cheating. Go over to MRP. That place is filled with shitty husbands who aren't cheating.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/16 01:46 PM
1

Nothing in the OP says good relationships don't exist. And it has NEVER been said that bad relationships don't exist. So what is the point of this whole thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/16 01:31 PM
7

If a peer reviewed study can be wrong, like the one about vaccines and autism, then an unscientific survey can be wrong too. Not to mention extrapolating information from an unscientific survey that isn't even in that survey.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/16 04:23 AM
3

Well it doesn't necessarily follow that blue pill women care about them either. And that's what i was responding to.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/16 02:41 AM
2

I am doing a lot more than you, that is the truth and honestly you are in absolutely no position to give anyone advice. Like what? A kickball league? In what world is that "doing a lot"? You run your mouth about what losers you think everyone else is but you've yet to prove any proof that you have anything going for you. In fact, you simply bitch about how you're failing socially and begging for better men than you to tell you what to do. But when we've told you what to do, you whine and insult.…
/r/askTRP22/11/16 01:59 AM
4

And many husbands are in shitty marriages because they're shitty husbands. What's your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/16 01:53 AM
3

I have literally never seen someone claim that all relationships MUST be good. Never. If you have examples, then post em. You can't make the claim and then when asked for evidence say, "na na na. I'm right because I say so." I've seen blues argue against the commonly held red belief that if a woman is with a guy trp doesn't think is attractive enough for her that it's impossible for her to love him or enjoy fucking him. That she's only using him to pay for shit while she goes out fucking every C…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/16 01:27 AM
3

All that was said was IN THIS study with THIS sample of people at THIS point in time. 80% of men were assessed as "unattractive" And yet many twerps treat it like gospel and say it applys to ALL men and women. If it was only THAT "sample of people" then it's incorrect to use it as a hard and fast rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/16 01:19 AM
4

So then the study supposedly proving the link between vaccines and autism isn't wrong because they did a study and found what they found and reported what they found? Good to know that just because OKC does a study then it's impossible to discredit a bullshit study about vaccines and autism.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/16 10:32 PM
7

Those men can't get their own women to care about them, what makes you think another man's woman would?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/16 10:19 PM
4

Saying that most men can get laid isn't the same as saying he's in a "good relationship". Where are the posts that say just because a man is in a relationship it means he's automatically in a good one? Can you provide them? I'd love to see what you're talking about. I've never seen anyone say it's a guarantee of relationship success.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/16 10:12 PM
3

What's your source, evidence and factual bases for your apparent claims that just because "most men" are in "relationships" and that most men get sex, therefore, these men are happy, successful in their relationships, and are getting everything they want? Why do you believe this? I've never actually seen anyone make the argument that just because a man is in a relationship that he's getting everything he wants. Do you have examples of people saying that? Whether blue pill or red pill, no one get…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/16 07:47 PM
1

And yet, you're the one who's still concerned because he's one of the "uncool kids". Is your life really that bad that you feel the need to whine about it on Reddit and carry pathetic revenge fantasies? I'm guessing it must be. Because no one who's responding to you, not even myself, is concerned enough about their place in the "social hierarchy" to give a shit. You're literally the only person who cares. And it's the exact reason why no one will ever give a shit about you. You care too much abo…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/16 03:26 AM
0

Time for you to just accept the fact that you're never going to be one of those guys. You're too concerned with being one of them to actually be one. But I look forward to your next temper tantrum.
/r/askTRP21/11/16 03:04 AM
1

Are you worried about those things? Or are you too busy being one of the uncool kids?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/16 02:55 AM
1

I find it fascinating that you were only able to respond to that one line. Since you're unable to actually form a response to anything else, I'll accept your defeat.
/r/askTRP21/11/16 02:49 AM
2

He simultaneously thinks everyone else is a bigger loser than him, and is jealous of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/16 08:00 PM
1

With all this time to waste I bet you're a 38 year old loser stuck in the basement of his mother's house. I'm sure you'd like to believe that. You're so incredibly desperate to perceive yourself as better than literally anyone, that you have to convince yourself that random people are losers. The very thought of yet another person being better than you causes you to completely lose your shit. Gotta be honest. It's kinda hilarious. Can't wait to see your next temper tantrum.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/16 06:55 PM
2

You have time to kill because you don't have a wife, family, kids, or anything. I thought you said having a wife and kids is lame. You are an old loser who is hurt so badly by the fact that someone wants to be popular and that you yourself will never live the type of life I talk about. Why would I care if you want to be popular? You're a stranger. I just think it's funny because you never will be. You're not in high school anymore. You missed that time. I didn't. And it wasn't anything special. …
/r/askTRP18/11/16 06:50 PM
2

Oh my god. Kid, you have a very sad point of view on things.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/16 06:44 PM
2

Frat guys are the cool kids?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/16 06:29 PM
1

You don't. But other people do.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/16 06:28 PM
2

And you're on reddit So? As are a lot of people. Is everyone on Reddit a loser? bet all of what you wrote is erotica Huh? Do you even know what that is? I am sure if you are arguing with me your life is in the shitter Keep telling yourself that, dude. You asked a stupid question and got all pissy when you people told you that you were an idiot. And pathetic. you old sack of shit At 38? That's not really old. Rot already you fucking loser. Nah. I'd rather keep messing with you. I have time to kil…
/r/askTRP18/11/16 06:27 PM
2

you fucking loser. Says the guy who wants to know how to get revenge on all of the guys who are better than him. You're so caught up in the fact that you've always been an insignificant loser, that all you can do it fantasize about fucking the high school girls who would never give you the time of day. Then again, it's not like any girls your own age give you the time of day. Goddamn man. How pathetic can you be? What exactly makes you a "high value person"? Why would anyone who used to ignore y…
/r/askTRP18/11/16 06:20 PM
4

You seem to be confused that those aren't the only two options and while different forms of desperation, are both desperation nonetheless. Your analogy is basically saying, "well I'm choosy because I don't eat out of a dumpster. I choose to go across town to get sushi from a gas station." You want to find a desperate girl who will marry you, not because she wants to, or has any kind of affection for you, but simply because she has no other options to get out of complete poverty. Go ahead and do …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 10:18 PM
1

Kinda sounds like you're saying she doesn't know.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 09:36 PM
6

Yes. BECAUSE YOU AND YOUR BOSS ARE DIFFERENT, YOU SEE? Biology, blah blah blah. Bosses initiate 100% of firings, so it's worse if women cheat than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 08:55 PM
3

His marriage sounds completely miserable. Kinda explains his point of view on everything, i guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 08:43 PM
2

"Hi dear. How are you?" "Bitch, stop smothering me!!!!"
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 08:42 PM
4

Make any donations to NAMBLA recently? You know, because not supporting them and their attraction is "the lowest of the low" afterall.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 08:18 PM
1

Short leash you have your husband on!!!! ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 08:15 PM
1

Or it's just a common courtesy thing. If your wife said she was going out without any indication of where she was going or when she would be back, you wouldn't see that as kinda rude and a little disrespectful? You don't automatically have to assume the worst and figure she's out fucking someone else. THAT would be a trust issue. Thinking it's rude and disrespectful has nothing to do with trust. No one is saying you have to tell your wife where you are at any given moment, but if asked where you…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 08:12 PM
2

Or just a general interest in what your partner/spouse is up to. I'll never understand why some see it as a strange phenomenon when people in a relationship genuinely like each other and don't have an agenda to control/change/defeat the other person.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 08:01 PM
1

Does she accept that you're fucking other women?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 07:40 PM
1

You fuck other women and she knows it. That's the very definition of an open relationship. It's either open and she knows, or you're cheating by deceiving her and she's not aware.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 07:16 PM
1

If she's okay having sex with someone who is also having sex with slutty women who have sex with other slutty guys who have sex with other slutty women etc, etc . Then no, she is not concerned with her sexual health, nor is she "wholesome". Even if you want to take away the very real STD risk, you can still point to the fact that open relationships are by definition, unwholesome. Not to say they're wrong or anything, they're just not wholesome.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 07:06 PM
2

Chasing or sticking your dick in other women?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 05:59 PM
2

Wholesome women value their sexual health, no? Isn't that what makes them wholesome to begin with? A traditional view on sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 05:53 PM
7

men with few options. Like men who want to go to some third world shithole and marry a teenager in exchange for a green card? Those kind of men? I'd only marry an 18 year old with no kids. If I wanted to get married I'd probably go to a 3rd world country to find a young childless wife who was willing to marry me for a green card or financial support. -fuxdpus
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 05:46 PM
2

You misunderstood. If she's fine with it, then SHE isn't very wholesome.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 05:44 PM
2

What you're saying is that your "wholesome girlfriend" is fine with you banging other chicks on the side? Doesn't sound very wholesome.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 05:38 PM
1

You've never had my grilled cheese.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 05:26 PM
1

My school had a little under 2,000 and our typical class size was between 20 and 30.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/16 02:08 PM
2

You're right. Renting an 800sq ft bachelor pad with a Scarface poster on your wall is the epitome of cool. Your problem is that you want to be in high school again. You don't want to be an adult. You think adulting is lame. Dude. High school is fucking stupid. Only those who peaked in high school want to go back there. You're heading for adulthood whether you like it or not, Al Bundy.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/16 01:07 PM
1

A couple thousand is pretty typical for urban/suburban areas.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/16 01:00 PM
3

Lets see which one of you in here actually knows shit and aren't just some random keyboard jockey. for those of you who actually know your shit Don't mention celebrities or anything in order to pretend like you actually know something And then your response to me is... why the angry response? Holy shit. Your lack of self awareness is astounding. Alright cuntknuckle, you want an answer? "High value" people don't give a shit about pathetic little revenge fantasies. You know how you still think abo…
/r/askTRP16/11/16 12:55 PM
4

You keep asking the same stupid question and telling people they don't know what they're talking about when they answer. So why don't you just say the answer you're looking for?
/r/askTRP16/11/16 04:29 AM
6

What in the wide, wide world of fuck are you talking about, kid?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/16 04:25 AM
6

That's dumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/16 03:21 AM
10

It's really no different than when SO many people on the right lost their shit after Obama was elected. He was a gay muslim socialist hell bent on confiscating all guns, banning the bible, and sending white christians to FEMA camps. It wasn't an overreaction either. It was a FACT. Well, turns out they were wrong. Hopefully your friends are wrong too.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/16 12:11 AM
1

Talk about it on the Internet, obviously.
/r/MarriedRedPill02/11/16 12:04 AM
0

If you're calling the Mexicans who tell rapey stories rapists, then there isn't one. no one says that all terps are rapists. Just the ones who tell rapey stories or say that women want to be raped.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/16 12:25 AM
0

Again, you're being too sensitive. Making fun of terps is not the same as hating. And even if it wasn't, you really want to label them the same as Westboro, or neo-Nazi groups? THOSE are hate groups. TBP is a fucking sub on Reddit that points out stupid shit another sub on Reddit says. Who cares? Lighten up, Francis
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 02:42 PM
0

But what's the difference between you calling TBP a hate sub and a "femenazi" calling TRP a hate sub? Red pillers would lose their shit about it, because SJWs or whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 02:15 AM
1

Is it not possible to engage in debate here and do some trolling on TBP?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 02:40 PM
0

the hypocrites that live in that sub should really consider therapy or perhaps a pharmaceutical regiment... The same could be said of TRP. But at the end of the day, who really gives a shit? Getting worked up about RP or BP or anything you see having to do with either one is stupid. It's entertaining to poke fun at guys who live and breathe the red pill bullshit. Sue me. I don't care what you guys post there. I'm not trying to get you banned. I just like laughing at it and occasionally poking th…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 10:47 AM
1

You mean there are differences in the way people think? Even if they're both ostensibly on the same side of an argument? Well color me shocked.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 10:41 AM
0

Discussing the content on TBP is literally one of the reasons we're all here. You're missing the point. If the things said on TBP hurt your feelings so much, why are you here debating them? Why continue to keep hurting your own feelings?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 10:38 AM
1

"Hate sub"? That's awfully dramatic. You could just ignore it if it hurts your feelings so much.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 03:37 AM
1

But it's also BP advice. And this whole debate was set up on the premise that RP is right and BP is wrong. One can't be right and one wrong on things they agree on.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 03:31 AM
2

So you're not that different from a blooper?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 03:27 AM
2

Spending one minute doing either one is dumb as hell. Who fucking cares? Wanting to offend or wanting to be offended is equally ridiculous. But let me guess, you support his position because, cunts?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 10:08 AM
3

You're reading WAY too much into this. Both sides are fucking stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/16 09:01 PM
6

It also means that some men are assholes who say shit just to hear themselves talk. Why would any man care enough about yoga pants to turn it into a thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/16 08:58 PM
2

Pretty sure that you saying dumb shit is why people think you might be autistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 11:17 PM
3

You could also say it's fine because it doesn't make them happy and in fact makes them incredibly bitter. But that would depend on which side you're on.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 03:31 PM
2

Math is hard for you, eh?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 03:22 PM
2

Wow. You could not be more wrong. Attraction isn't needed for reproduction. Arousal is. Arousal is a biological response. Men and women can become aroused When they're being raped, but that doesn't mean they're attracted. Goddamn. Read a fucking book. You really think that all men and women are attracted to the same thing? Utter horseshit. People absolutely have their own taste is what they're attracted to. Some men are attracted and aroused by other men. Does that mean ALL men are attracted and…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 03:16 PM
1

So you agree that the majority of women in relationships initiate sex regularly?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/16 09:28 PM
1

No woman wants to be with that guy. That's why he's so bitter towards them. I don't think you have to worry.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/16 09:27 PM
3

provides comfort and security Alpha as fuck, brah. It's pretty funny how the definition of "alpha" changes to whatever fits their world view.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/16 09:16 PM
3

Yeah, that's not actually true at all. Women are attracted to traits that are not considered "alpha". Attraction, or "making a pussy wet", as you so eloquently put it, is not a one size fits all. No matter how much you terps try to convince yourselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/16 09:09 PM
1

We're talking about in relationships. The question says "your guy", meaning your significant other. And it "initiate" is referring to sex. With a SO.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/16 09:03 PM
2

Women don't initiate Nonsense. Women regularly initiate. Look how many women here are posting about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/16 03:50 PM
1

I just asked you your opinion. Because based on your other message it sounded like you have an issue with what women have done to men's salaries.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/16 02:37 PM
1

So you don't think women should be doing the same jobs as men?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/16 01:19 PM
5

Oh. So it's an opinion based on confirmation bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/16 12:33 PM
2

She was on the show because it's a more interesting conversation. Pretty much everyone agrees the a male teacher is creepy and in the wrong. But plenty of people think it's not that big a deal with a woman teacher. Including MANY red pillers.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/16 04:06 AM
1

It's only a matter of time before the goats start taking advantage of the children. Because of goatergamy, obviously.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/16 04:03 AM
3

How did you form that opinion?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/16 04:02 AM
1

That was a response to YOUR statement that men don't get any benefit from their wives working. You gave specifics. So what benefits to men get if their wives are not working? You can't say there are negatives to a woman working without clearly implying that theose things would be different, and therefore positive, if a woman wasn't working. Don't make stupid statements if you won't at least stand by them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/16 05:16 PM
1

So how would it be different if the woman didn't also work?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/16 03:36 PM
1

So if she wasn't working and just taking care of the kids all day while he came home and contributed nothing but a paycheck to household she would be super attracted to him and want to fuck all the time? Quite the leap you're making there.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/16 03:10 PM
1

I believe someone said the age of consent is 16 in Iowa, so the age difference isn't the biggest issue here. By far, the biggest issue is that she was a teacher and he was a student. That's what she's being charged for. Not the age difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/16 01:50 PM
4

Also, men don't work, have careers and buy houses and shit because they like them, they do it to get a quality girl. Like Dave chappel said, if a man could get laid in a cardboard box, he wouldn't buy a house. It directly contradicts what you said. You said a man doesn't buy a house because he wants to. You said he does it to attract a woman. Men don't care about these things getting done for the most part, or they would be getting done. They care about relaxing, downtime and fun after an 8 hour…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/16 04:49 AM
4

The woman is complete moron who isn't fit to deliver mail, let alone hold office. But I don't believe she was just a token "you're a woman, you'll do" choice. It was pandering to the base to get someone hokey, vitriolic, yet charismatic. The McCain campaign was floundering and needed a boost. She didn't cost him the election, she actually made it a closer race. It's totally fucked up, because, again, she's a complete moron, but it did work. Unfortunately, the end result was a catalyst for the un…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/16 03:29 AM
1

(ii) is there any argument against verbally and emotionally abusing your wife if it 'works'? Is that a serious question? You want to berate and abuse someone so much that they hate themselves enough to stay with you? Is that what you consider "working"? That's your goal? A Stockholm Syndrome relationship? Dude. That's pretty pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/16 03:18 AM
7

quit her job after she got fired I don't think it works that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/16 03:13 AM
3

I guess it means if she makes a lot of money, then it doesn't matter if he loves her very much. He's clearly a romantic at heart.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/16 03:08 AM
5

Not all men are slobs that would be happy in a shitty apartment with dirty dishes and piles of clothes all over. Many of us value having a clean, well appointed home. I don't have a nice place because it'll impress women. I have a nice place because i value that. As do tons of men. Is that what terpers think? Only have a clean home to get laid? That's pretty pathetic. Housework isn't a woman's job. It's the job of anyone who doesn't want to live like a disgusting slob.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/16 02:46 AM
6

But if more and more households have two people working full time, then men ARE getting more out of it. They're no longer required to be the sole earner. So why wouldn't it be a given that they contribute more to the chores that were traditionally a woman's responsibility when they were not working full time?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/16 12:35 AM
1

That's a whole lot of conjecture right there. Women's attraction is weaker and less stable than men's. Got any proof besides opinion? Women are only attracted to a small % of men, whereas men are attracted to most women Source? I can get behind the idea that men, taken as a whole, are attracted to more women than vice versa, but to say women are attracted to a small percentage is totally false. Otherwise you wouldn't see so many guys complaining about women who are with guys they perceive as "be…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/16 11:59 PM
1

Again, that doesn't mean anything. Women are attracted to men. Men are attracted to women. What are you trying to say? They're not?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/16 11:06 PM
2

What does that even mean? It's just a bunch of jargon.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/16 10:36 PM
1

it's not nearly to the same degree as women. Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/16 10:09 PM
1

It's not actually a thing. There's a theory on TRP that if a woman has sex with more than a few guys then she is incapable of bonding with you. It comes from a study of divorce rates and the number of men she's slept with. But it shows a fundamental misunderstanding of correlation vs causation. Some women don't bond well. Most do. None of it has anything to do with number of partners. How do you spot them? There's no hard and fast rule. And it's because people are different. It's just trial and …
/r/askTRP20/10/16 12:16 PM
1

No
/r/askTRP20/10/16 01:38 AM
1

Bonding is strongest when a woman has sex with the same man over and over. Okay. That bond can be overwritten over time by having sex over and over, but it's less effective. Directly contradicts the first statement. If a woman has more sex with her 25th than any of the previous 24, then that's who she would bond with the most, according to your first statement. The difference is that the first partner is the one that has the greatest bond. That's my point. This isn't true at all. You can apply t…
/r/askTRP19/10/16 04:45 AM
3

So the effectiveness of oxytocin is highest the first time a woman has sex with a man? That sounds like kind of a leap in logic. Why wouldn't the bonding be the strongest with the man she had sex with the most? Otherwise women would bond the strongest with the first person. And that's obviously not the case. Wouldn't that also mean a woman bonds most with her first child and incapable of bonding after a few children?
/r/askTRP19/10/16 02:44 AM
4

A high partner count reduces a females abilities to pair bond. This does not happen with males. I've seen this said so many times, but I've never seen a good explanation of why that is. That study of divorces certainly isn't an explanation.
/r/askTRP18/10/16 02:50 PM
1

She'll have to be the one to tell you. But you can't tell really be suggesting you know more about women than an actual woman, are you?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/16 07:55 PM
1

Tell that to TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/16 07:55 PM
1

I'm guessing a lot more than you can tell her about being a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/16 07:34 PM
1

It's a lot easier when you actually listen and don't assume to know better because they're basically children or whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/16 07:34 PM
2

We used to just call the stereotypical dude-bros, Chads. Just your average frat dude who wasn't smart, but wasn't dumb. Wasn't completely boring, but definitely wasn't interesting. The kind of dude who lived in the same city neighborhoods as Trixies until they got married and moved to the suburbs to enjoy a soul-crushing life of minivans and golf shirts. But, that doesn't seem to be how people use it anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/16 03:18 PM
1

Out of curiosity, why 50? And if you're so convinced there are "very few" attractive women, how do you expect to reach that number? You'd think the options would run out if there's such a dearth of attractive women. And wouldn't those options be even more limited with how many women are married or in LTRs?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/16 09:37 PM
1

Then you've had sex with "very few" women?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/16 08:49 PM
1

What?! It's not?! Fucking. Mind. Blown. Dude. There are a lot of attractive girls in California. Which is in the US. Therefore there are a lot attractive girls in America. And there are a lot of attractive girls in other parts of the US. Therefor there are a lot of attractive girls in America. Do you only have sex with unattractive women?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/16 08:41 PM
1

You live in California and don't think there are any attractive women out there? Come on dude. I know you're trying to be all cool and shit, but that's just silly.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/16 07:56 PM
1

A lot of women are overweight, sure. But that's a FAR stretch from "very few women are attractive in America." That's just a nonsense statement. Unless you're living in the South. In which case I would say it may appear that way, but the rest of the country has a shit-ton of attractive women. What places do you think has a significantly higher population of women you deem attractive?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/16 07:40 PM
1

There are very few women who are attractive in America. What in the fuck?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/16 06:25 PM
1

They're not mutually exclusive. Friendship is important in a successful relationship. Having a romantic connection certainly doesn't preclude friendship.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/16 12:03 AM
1

How dominant do you consider yourself? In what context? With women? Work? Friends? I mean, I guess my answer is as dominant as I need to be. Do you enjoy violence at all? Not particularly. I'm not one to be intimidated easily, but I certainly avoid violence whenever possible. And to be honest, it's not hard to avoid it on a day to day basis.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/16 10:08 PM
1

How dominant do you consider yourself? Do you enjoy violence at all? What in the world?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/16 09:54 PM
1

Every hot stranger, on a biological level, you might have the desire to fuck. But a lot of that is because your mind is able to fill in the blanks of what she's really like. Or, you can simply ignore her as an actual person and think of her purely as a means to some enjoyable sex. However, when you're talking about a friend. Someone you are close to. Where you know them as a complete person, then the thought of just randomly fucking them doesn't always pop into you head. There are friends that I…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/16 09:44 PM
1

For all of the reasons I explained. I'm in a LTR. I prefer sex in the context of a relationship. I know this is hard to believe, but there are actually men out there that don't want to fuck every attractive woman. Some prefer one partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/16 09:35 PM
1

If you don't think of her as a friend in addition to a lover, then it's kind of unclear.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/16 09:11 PM
1

Completely false. Not attracted to them. They're attractive. But not what I look for in a sexual partner. I'm past the point of enjoying no strings attached. I prefer something more. That's why I'm in a LTR. I have done the one night stand or fwb thing. It was fun for a time in my life, but I prefer the stability and emotional bond of a real relationship. I actually like having sex with the same person over and over. To me, there's more opportunity for fun.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/16 09:10 PM
1

It kinda shows the only reason you started dating your wife is because you wanted someone to fuck. If you wouldn't have been friends with her unless you could fuck her, then what kind of bond can you really have?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/16 06:24 PM
1

I have several women who I consider great friends and truly value our relationship. Most of them are also quite attractive. But there's a difference between thinking they're attractive and being attracted to them. I know a relationship never would have worked out with them. That's why "better off as friends" is a statement people make.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/16 06:21 PM
1

You wouldn't be friends with your wife if you weren't fucking her?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/16 06:18 PM
2

It exists. I've seen it. I've experienced it. Those millions of men and women who you mentioned have also experienced it. For some reason only you and your other terps haven't. That honestly speaks volumes that the only people who don't believe men and women can be friends is people who see relationships as adversarial and only worth it if you get more out of it than you give. It says WAY more about you guys than it does about women's ability to be a "real friend".
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/16 03:08 PM
2

But you seeing people play in the Super Bowl is not what makes the Super Bowl exist. It exists whether you've seen it or not. Just like friendships between men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/16 12:17 PM
3

Have you ever played in the Super Bowl? Does that mean no one has?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/16 03:57 AM
5

So because you've never seen it work, doubtful but okay, you say it doesn't work for anyone? That's pretty arrogant. There's plenty of people capable of doing plenty of things you're not. Including have a real friendship with a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/16 03:23 AM
10

Gotta be honest. This post is kind of all over the place and I'm not sure I've even seen some of the things you're talking about. "Sex without attraction is rape"? Is this a common viewpoint? Literally never seen that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/16 02:26 AM
2

Why's that?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/16 02:23 AM
5

So your contention is that men and women can't be real friends unless one or both of them is "low value"?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/16 11:02 PM
1

Seems like you're still not paying attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/16 09:32 PM
1

Correct. That's pretty obvious, no?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/16 07:04 PM
0

Wait, you say that cheating has never been encouraged by anyone on TRP? Sweet denial, brah.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/16 07:02 PM
2

That assumes all men will have sex with any attractive woman no matter the circumstances. There are plenty of guys who don't line one night stands or random hookups. Not to mention that most men in relationships won't cheat just because a woman offered up sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/16 10:08 PM
1

Okay. So you agree that we've moved beyond our basic instincts.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/16 01:04 PM
1

I actually think it's pretty arrogant that RP people justify shitty behavior with "men just want to fuck as many girls as possible so don't get pissed when we cheat. It's in out nature." As though you're justified to do what you please without regard for anyone else. Fuck that. It's not nature. It's just you being shitty.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/16 04:59 AM
1

That's not how commitment works. Have you ever had a healthy committed relationship before? From the sound of things, it really seems like you've missed out on that.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/16 04:56 AM
1

It takes more effort for the man to say "I love you"? Because that's also what the 2/3 rule says. For every 3 times she says it, only say it twice. That's not advice. That's manipulation.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/16 02:24 AM
1

This conversation just took a turn for the bizarre.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/16 09:09 PM
1

Batman IS Bruce Wayne. He's not pretending. Are you saying that you pretend to be a decent human being?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/16 09:04 PM
1

it's a red flag that she's unlikely to appreciate his commitment. Wait, what? Partner count has very little to do with "appreciation". And what does "appreciate his commitment" even mean? It takes two people committing to each other. Not one person giving commitment and the other person appreciating it. That's just...silly
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/16 09:03 PM
1

You're not a real douche, you just play one on the internet? That kind of thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/16 08:33 PM
1

That assumes when a man does something, it's more valuable than when a woman does it. This has nothing to do with pussy. This has to do with your denial of common ideas on TRP. Just because you personally don't subscribe to everything doesn't mean the ideas aren't all over TRP. You can keep hamstering if you must, but you're doing yourself a disservice.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/16 08:32 PM
1

Yes, there are individuals. Like I said. But society as a whole has moved past our basic instincts. Pointing me to a small percentage of people who are barely doing more than the minimum to survive has absolutely no impact on what the human race has accomplished. And I suspect you know that.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/16 08:28 PM
1

Nice cop out. You don't believe what you said, so why even say it? To be edgy?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/16 07:23 PM
1

Then what is the 2/3 rule? Is that not saying you should only do 2 things for every 3 things she does?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/16 07:21 PM
1

Nonsense. Our most basic animal instincts are to fuck and fight and survive. We do a hell of a lot more than that. We don't just fuck anyone any time we want. We don't attack and steal from anyone any time we want. We don't do the minimum just to survive. We create. We build shit. We have empathy. We have emotions. We recognize beauty in things that have nothing to do with sex. Some members of society have a hard time overcoming their instincts, but the vast majority of people are well beyond ou…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/16 04:33 PM
1

That I agree with. If one person is losing, then you're both losing. And that's why I don't think TRP is a great strategy to improve relationships. It might not be what the intended message is, but there are plenty of posters on TRP that have the win/lose, me vs her, "need to get more than I give" mentality. You can't deny it's pretty common.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/16 04:26 PM
1

I'm not judging you, brah. I'm wondering why you hold the belief that women "should not be permitted to interact with men they won't sleep with", when you yourself interact with women who won't sleep with you. You said it's because they help you get girls, but then you said you talk about things that aren't related to them helping you get girls. It sounds like you just have normal friendships with women. You're allowed to have normal friendships with women, but no one else should be allowed to? …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/16 04:21 PM
1

So you don't practice monogamy?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/16 01:05 PM
1

Are they science fiction stories about helping you get laid?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/16 12:27 PM
1

Ah. So your story is changing. Then I'm guessing you don't discuss anything with your female friends except which girl they're going to help you try to fuck? What else would there be to talk about?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/16 12:24 PM
1

Because being shitty as a sexual strategy is still being shitty. TRP claims to be about "self improvement", but adopting shitty behavior because you're working under the assumption that all women are shitty (AWALT), which is what a lot of what TRP says, invalidates the mentality that men are better than women. Sure, you might not talk that way, but it's all over the "manosphere".
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/16 05:04 AM
-1

That would be a valid point if humans were animals who had no control over their base instincts, obviously that's not the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/16 04:53 AM
1

Okay, but if TRP is advocating their message, and we're discussing TRP, then how does that make my point invalid?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/16 04:51 AM
1

Yes, I've seen Rollo. To me, he has the same bitterness that you describe in TRP. And if you see what I'm talking about with TRP, then why are you arguing with me about TRP?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/16 04:50 AM
1

If you're saying that women have the capacity to be shitty means AWALT, then why shouldn't AMALT be a thing? Because men have exactly the same capacity to be shitty. And that's the thing about TRP. The prevailing thought is women are incapable of love or loyalty because some of them are shitty. But few red pillers are willing to admit then same about men. They claim the shitty behavior is a result of women. When they really just need to admit that men can be every bit as terrible. And it's not b…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/16 04:45 AM
1

Again, I'm referring to TRP. That's why is specifically said "TRP" every time. But out of curiosity, what do you feel is the difference? How does TRP differ from what you define as "red pill "?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/16 03:55 AM
1

Again, we're talking about TRP. But out of curiosity, what's you definition of "Red Pill"? And how does it differ from TRP?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/16 03:53 AM
1

No. I'm talking about the pervasive TRP mentality that says women are children who need to be "Captained". That if you're not controlling the relationship then you're not "alpha", and therefore losing.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/16 03:50 AM
1

Just like women aren't of a hive mind. So AWALT is false. But it's one of the tenants of TRP. Hopefully that's the irony you're referring to.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/16 03:46 AM
1

Then you're not who I'm talking about. But saying it's a "baseless accusation" to say that a lot of posters on TRP don't have that mentality is certainly being dishonest.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/16 03:24 AM
1

Do you feel a relationship needs winners and losers? Does someone need to "win" the relationship, in your opinion?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/16 03:04 AM
1

Okay, but I'm simply saying it's common on TRP. There's a lot of disagreement between red pillers about what being "red pill" actually means. Your definition isn't necessarily what other red pillers believe. Hell, a lot of red pillers think it's "blue pill" to even get married at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/16 03:02 AM
1

Okay. So what's the difference. Not all red pillers are exactly how I described? Sure. But it's still commonly posted on TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/16 02:56 AM
0

Are you seriously saying that no one on TRP talks about winning the relationship? Come on dude. At least be honest. I'm not making it a personal assessment. I'm just pointing out the obvious.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/16 02:21 AM
0

How?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/16 02:02 AM
0

Cynical is one thing. But seeing a relationship as a winner and a loser is profoundly disfunctional. You don't try to make sure the woman is getting less from the relationship than you just so you can feel like a winner. And there's no denying that is a common viewpoint on TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/16 02:02 AM
1

In theory yes. But it seems to create an adversarial mentality that doesn't tend to create positive results with many women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/16 12:40 AM
2

I don't subscribe to the alpha/beta label crap. You're just dudes who've never had much social acumen that are trying to fix it. I don't think it's a good philosophy to accomplish it, but that's neither here nor there.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/16 12:31 AM
1

Does TRP look like it has a bunch of stable guys posting there? I agree that it doesn't turn them alpha or whatever, but it's certainly not making them stable.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/16 12:15 AM
3

But that's not what you said. You said women should not be allowed to interact with men unless they plan on fucking him.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 10:21 PM
2

But if they won't fuck you, why do you allow them to interact with you? Didn't you say that shouldn't be allowed?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 08:37 PM
2

If they're not fucking you, what are they doing talking to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 08:19 PM
2

Are you fucking your female friends?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 08:11 PM
1

At the end of this conversation, I won't be committing to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 06:58 PM
2

Or, you know, because she's a normal human capable of speaking to people without it being about fucking. I spend shit-tons of time every single day talking to people I don't want to fuck. I don't know think I know a single person who only interacts with people they want to fuck. Are you saying that you don't interact with people you don't want to fuck? That's almost impressive.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 06:49 PM
5

"just so you know at the end of this date I won't be committing to you," Not only do I call them before the date to tell them this. But I remind them at the start of the first date. Then I remind them again when we move in together. Then, once again, before I propose. And I also include it in my wedding vows. It's the middle name of of my kids. And you can be damn sure it will be on my tombstone when we're dead and buried next to each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 06:39 PM
1

You mean you didn't just rape here? Huh. Look at that. As it turns out, it's super easy to not rape a girl. You just, don't rape her. I wonder if other men know about this? Maybe we should get the word out. "Brahs. If you don't want to rape a girl. You should refrain from raping her." Genius!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 06:27 PM
2

What? Women can't interact with a guy unless she wants to fuck him? How does that make any fucking sense?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 06:23 PM
1

Depends. Is the 30 year old also stunning? I'm 38. Don't have any interest in dating a 20 year old. Fucking? Sure. But dating? No way. And a virgin? Nah. I like having sex. Don't feel like waiting or rushing into a marriage. Not to mention the virgin is likely to think I've had sex with more people than she's comfortable with.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 06:08 PM
1

Or, incompatible as a prospect.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 05:58 PM
1

Well, there are far less of you and you don't typically have close interactions with as many women. The vast majority of women are beaten or killed by someone close to them. They're often called "crimes of passion". And those guys are a very small percentage of men overall. Just as the two you mentioned are a very small percentage of incels.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 05:56 PM
1

Ha. Yeah, everyone gets hatred from somewhere on the internet. Some from multiple places. It's best not to let it get you down.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 05:11 PM
1

If you are truly this upset because what you call individual variety I call "damaged", you care far too much about my personal opinion in my mind. I'm not actually upset. I'm a man, so you weren't even talking about me. I'm just making a point. "Damaged" would imply there is something inherently WRONG about that person. They're not healthy. They're not whole. I just object to the assumption that there's something wrong with another person for having a different point of view than you when it com…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 04:35 PM
1

Because it clearly indicates we have a VERY different PoV on sexuality, so much so that I'd imagine it could very well be an issue for us long term. Yes, and that's totally fine. So just call it that. Incompatibility. A differing view on sex doesn't make someone inherently "damaged". You're not "damaged" because casual sex is something you avoid. And you would have every right to take exception to a person who enjoys casual sex calling you "damaged" because you don't. Like others have said. The …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 04:06 PM
1

I don't really see many people having trouble grasping that concept at all. In fact, it's WAY more common for a red piller to fail to grasp and accept the concept that many men genuinely don't care. More often than not, the guys who care about a girl's number are guys who have a very low number. Sometimes by choice, sometimes not. If it's by choice, then more power to you. You probably wouldn't be a good match with a girl who has a higher count. You have different values when it comes to sex. So…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 03:30 PM
0

You really don't see why raping a women, even if it was 100% guaranteed you'd never get in any trouble, is bad? Really? If anything, a woman who acts a cocktease and attempts to pull a take-backsie after leading a man on - she is the real criminal, and the one deserving of punishment. What in the fuck? You think that a woman should be punished for not fucking a guy who thought he was going to get laid? Dude. That's fucking stupid. Not to mention it sounds like the opposite of what you self-procl…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 02:33 PM
1

Social awkwardness in general tends to be kind of unattractive. It's not specific to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/16 09:03 PM
1

Ha. So every attractive woman you know has told you that they have slept with over 30 guys? I seriously can think of maybe 3 girls I've know that have slept with more than 30 guys. Perhaps more have, but I doubt it. And I wouldn't necessarily know because that's not usually a topic of conversation between normal people. It's something that exists in the minds of red pillers.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/16 09:02 PM
1

And you said that "all women are sluts". So your contention is that every single woman who's 25 has had sex with 30+ guys?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/16 06:02 PM
1

Meh. Not in my experience. But if you define slut as a woman who has sex with anyone who isn't you, then I could see how you'd think that. But that's not a very good way to define it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/16 05:05 PM
1

You lift, brah?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/16 01:47 PM
1

You think I'm a 10? Thanks man. Nobody's ever said that before. I appreciate the compliment.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/16 01:13 PM
1

No you're right. TRP tells you all women are sluts so we should just believe your opinion. That's a much better way. Pulling numbers out of your ass is super duper scientific.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/16 01:13 PM
1

Or just don't be a twerp asshole. It's worked for me really well.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/16 07:24 AM
1

Oh, so you're talking out of your ass? Because math is hard, I presume. Got it. Thanks for clarifying.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/16 07:22 AM
2

Yes, the average number may not be completely trustworthy, but it's certainly not "normal" for girls to have "dozens" by the age of 25. That's totally false.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/16 12:30 AM
2

But wait! That can't be true. It doesn't fit the 80/20 narrative. Therefore let's all pretend your point isn't completely true. La la la la la
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/16 11:34 PM
2

How isn't it relevant? His claim was "Normal girls have dozens of sexual partners before the age of 25." My response was to his false claim. What isn't actually relevant is the number of suitors. That's not what was being discussed
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/16 11:31 PM
1

Source? But even if that were true, which it's not, that still isn't "dozens". As you claim. "Dozens" is multiple dozens. 24, 36, 48 etc. You know a dozen is 12, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/16 10:21 PM
1

You don't need to sacrifice that much to get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/16 10:16 PM
1

At this point the "lift brah" mantra has become a parody of itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/16 10:15 PM
1

Can you explain what that means?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/16 07:48 PM
1

Blaming genetics and making a blanket statement that no one is trustworthy is the opposite of "RP men blame ourselves." You tell yourself that because you want to believe it, but the fact is you love to blame things that are not in your control instead of perhaps some introspection. "My genes. AWALT. Other people. Blah blah blah." That's all looking outward for blame about your shitty lot in life.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/16 07:47 PM
2

You're able to connect with, and tolerate college girls? Are you sure you're 28?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/16 07:01 PM
3

In no way is it "normal" for a girl under 25 to have "dozens". The average partners in a lifetime for women is still less than 10.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/16 06:59 PM
1

I suspect life would just feel strangely empty without women around to hate. That really gets to the crux of your personality, doesn't it? Your entire identity is hating women. It's the entire depth of you as a person. Woman-hater. That's actually...really sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/16 06:32 PM
2

Silly woman. You can't understand the tiny feeemale brain, because your brain is also tiny. Man understand the feeemale brain because our brains are bigger. And therefore smarter. And that guy clearly has the biggest brain of all. Because he knows what you're thinking better than you do. Just leave the thinking to the men and concern yourself only with having our offspring. Or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/16 02:16 PM
1

Since they seem to be the only two things you think are involved a relationship, I'll say that he doesn't own her vagina, any more than she owns his wallet. If a wife doesn't want to provide sex on demand to a man...from whom she derives financial support And what if she doesn't derive financial support? What if they both work? then she doesn't get to claim exclusive rights to his sexuality Then I guess that would go both ways. Since you seem SO intent on making the assumption this is still the …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/16 08:44 PM
1

"Honey, I don't want to go to work today and support you financially. I'm just exhausted and REALLY not in the mood today." That fly with you? Well, I'm not supported financially and never will be, so not sure I can really answer that. But if someone needs to take a day off of work because they're exhausted or just need a day off I don't really have a problem with it. But I'm looking at it from the point of view that I work with adults who know when that is and isn't appropriate. But the compari…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/16 08:44 PM
1

Are the red pillers Hitler in this analogy? Because I'm pretty certain the guys writing the books the red pillers love so much were around before the sub, which would make them Nietzsche.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/16 12:38 PM
1

Whether or not they call themselves "red pillers", they're saying the same things. It's no different than someone who is making money off feminist ideas but doesn't actually call themself a feminist.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/16 11:55 AM
1

"Honey, I don't want to go to work today and support you financially. I'm just exhausted and REALLY not in the mood today." That fly with you? Well, I'm not supported financially and never will be, so not sure I can really answer that. But if someone needs to take a day off of work because they're exhausted or just need a day off I don't really have a problem with it. But I'm looking at it from the point of view that I work with adults who know when that is and isn't appropriate. But the compari…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/16 03:42 AM
1

Since they seem to be the only two things you think are involved a relationship, I'll say that he doesn't own her vagina, any more than she owns his wallet. If a wife doesn't want to provide sex on demand to a man...from whom she derives financial support And what if she doesn't derive financial support? What if they both work? then she doesn't get to claim exclusive rights to his sexuality Then I guess that would go both ways. Since you seem SO intent on making the assumption this is still the …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/16 03:39 AM
1

Older celebrity men RARELY date woman who're 20 or younger. You see a 40 year old? Typical dating 25 and up. A 50 year old? 30 and up. Sure, that's "older man/younger woman" but your insistence that an older man will ALWAYS choose a 20 year old over a 30 year old is laughably false. And the reason is that while 20 year olds, on average, tend to be more physically attractive, the are not even close to more attractive emotionally or intellectually. So my point still stands. If 30+ year old man get…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/16 02:53 AM
3

A 30 year old who is looking for someone to date seriously isn't going to choose a 20 year old. He's going to pick someone who he has more in common with. Unless he's mentally 20 years old, in which case he's not "high value".
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/16 11:19 PM
1

Because he wants sex goddamit!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/16 10:29 PM
2

Is that any different than reds who think they have the magic key? No amount of reason or logic will change a red's mind. In fact, they simply tend to claim anything that contradicts them is inherently illogical because AWALT, mangina, lift brah, other reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/16 09:13 PM
1

No, I'm saying there ARE people who are trying to make money off of red pill ideas. And many of them can be found in the links along the sidebar at TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/16 08:33 PM
1

Well, then I guess I would ask if you can prove that I'm wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/16 08:32 PM
1

Are you really saying that I need to prove to you that red pillers direct people to read the sidebar and that on the sidebar are sites and books that exist outside of Reddit? That's something that requires proof? Um...okay https://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/ Look along the right side of the page. It's a thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/16 08:23 PM
1

Anyway, thanks for playing Not really sure what that means. What was I supposedly playing? I made my arguments. You made yours. It wasn't a contest. It was just a conversation that you seemed to get frustrated about.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/16 08:19 PM
2

So, you really don't have anything other than "life". Like I said, I haven't needed to look for something better. But it's obvious TRP doesn't have the key. isn't Red Pill or TRP Sure as hell is. It's no different than when women blame men for all of their problems. Two sides of the same coin. Sure, there's a lot of lip service paid to "taking responsibility" and "don't blame them for their nature". But underneath it all is still the blame game.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/16 07:54 PM
1

Well the red pill seems to exist outside of Reddit. I mean, aren't there sites and books that the red pillers of Reddit tout all the time?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/16 07:46 PM
2

Romantic comedies isn't the way to go. Yeah, no shit. That's why I said it. But the red pill doesn't seem to be the way to go either. At least, based on TRP and MRP, there isn't much success either. Got something better? Yeah, I already told you. Life. But that wasn't good enough for you. You need something for all the people who where life hasn't worked. To be honest, I don't believe a good one exists at all. But that could be because I've never felt the need to search one out. I haven't really…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/16 07:45 PM
3

Since they seem to be the only two things you think are involved a relationship, I'll say that he doesn't own her vagina, any more than she owns his wallet. If a wife doesn't want to provide sex on demand to a man...from whom she derives financial support And what if she doesn't derive financial support? What if they both work? then she doesn't get to claim exclusive rights to his sexuality Then I guess that would go both ways. Since you seem SO intent on making the assumption this is still the …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/16 07:36 PM
2

there's TRP, which explains it and breaks it down. It explains it in a way that YOU agree with. There are people who think romantic comedies explain relationship success too, doesn't make them any less wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/16 07:27 PM
1

There might be a great way to make money, but it really would just make you the exact same as the pua shitlords. Scamming people by telling them you have the answer their problems when the reality is there is no magic solution to everyone's problems. If there was, then someone would have figured it out a long time ago, made all the money available in that market, and we wouldn't still have snake-oil salesmen like pua's and hardcore red pillers.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/16 07:17 PM
2

People don't come out of the womb just knowing how to interact. Men don't come out of their mom's wombs just knowing how to talk to girls. Thanks Captain Obvious Which is where a lot of men learn exactly the wrong things. Well you could say that they're learning the wrong things on TRP as well. And yeah, there are some guys who just don't learn this stuff from watching others -- they need to learn it bit by bit, they need it explained to them by people who actually know what they're talking abou…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/16 07:13 PM
3

Oh I agree with all of that. I was simply talking about when a person is neglecting their duties outside the bedroom, then they start to lose the privilege of sex inside the bedroom. By "sex tap for life", I'm talking about making their spouse feel obligated to have sex with them every time they feel like it. If you've had sex 5, 10, 15 times already that week, and your partner says their tapped out, then they're not "withholding" sex or being selfish.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/16 07:04 PM
3

"Honey, I don't want to go to work today and support you financially. I'm just exhausted and REALLY not in the mood today." That fly with you? Well, I'm not supported financially and never will be, so not sure I can really answer that. But if someone needs to take a day off of work because they're exhausted or just need a day off I don't really have a problem with it. But I'm looking at it from the point of view that I work with adults who know when that is and isn't appropriate. But the compari…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/16 06:57 PM
3

Weeks or months when there's no underlying reason for it? Sure. I agree. Simply not having a desire to EVER have sex with your spouse is kinda makes you a shit spouse and it's probably best to go your separate ways if you're not actively working to improve things. Having said that, there can absolutely be valid reasons for a spouse to lose the privilege of sex. Marriage, or commitment, does not automatically mean sex on tap for life.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/16 06:32 PM
3

That wasn't a strawman. No one ever says a wife has to have sex when she's just given birth 10 hours before, or is projectile vomiting with a 105 degree fever. THAT is a strawman. Nowhere did I mention anyone saying that. So you agree that there are times when it's okay for a person to deny their spouse. Does the reason have to be as extreme as your examples, or is "honey, I'm just exhausted and REALLY not in the mood tonight" an acceptable answer?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/16 06:22 PM
2

Do you think the TRP provides all of that? Do you think it's actually making men successful in dating, mating and relationships? There's not much on that sub that indicates a lot of success. There's a lot of posts that just scream "fake". A lot of circle jerking. A lot of common knowledge somehow branded as "Red Pill Exclusive". But the thing I see most commonly is a whole lot of guys who simply complain that nothing is working for them, followed by a lot of guys telling them they're "doing it w…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/16 06:11 PM
1

With an abacus, obviously.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/16 06:10 PM
3

If your husband/wife wants sex and you always say no, you're a SHIT husband/wife no matter what excuse you use. And this gets into the point of the debate, I believe. Are you saying that no excuse is valid? That there's never a time where it's okay to turn down sex? Personally I think it's okay to turn down sex, but it certainly can't be every time. There are plenty of situations where having sex just isn't going to happen. As long as that doesn't constitute a large portion of the time, then you…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/16 06:05 PM
1

There isn't "another" place. There isn't a single place at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/16 06:00 PM
1

The red pill isn't that place either.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/16 05:57 PM
3

Yeah...not really. Plenty of people become attractive to their spouse again after a period of self-improvement. It's really not that uncommon in those types of relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/16 05:56 PM
3

What about relationships where expenses are shared? Women are every bit as likely to enjoy sex and make a living. This isn't the 1950's anymore. We don't live in a time where "men provide for women and women fuck them to earn it."
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/16 05:53 PM
4

Maybe that's because you're uncomfortable with yourself and your curiosity about sucking dicks. Not all men wonder about that. Never once have I thought, "huh, I wonder what it would be like to suck a dick." It really frees me up to not hate gays.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/16 05:01 PM
1

I don't personally buy the 80/20 rule. It doesn't really have any basis in reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/16 02:25 PM
1

Most men are in relationships. most men don't get casual sex. Gee, I wonder if those two things are related. But honestly, what percentage of guys do you think haven't been laid in, say, the last 6 months? I get laid. I just don't want to put in the effort to get it so I prefer to fap. So do you get laid or not? That post is very confusing. You say you get laid, but you also say you fap instead because it's too much work. No, they don't. Hot guys get all of the girls for casual sex. No, they don…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/16 04:08 PM
1

The terp with a heart of gold.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/16 12:39 PM
1

You should understand I'm calm. Even after you got all bitchy with your last comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/16 03:49 AM
1

Your contention is that feminists only care about rape committed by white men and have no issues with rape committed by black men?" Is that the central theme to your beliefs?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/16 01:50 AM
5

Did a fat person hurt your feelings? I don't understand your animosity. You're very angry about something that doesn't effect you.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/16 01:03 AM
1

Well pardon me for participating in a public forum and noticing something very very stupid was said.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/16 01:01 AM
1

My whole point at the beginning was why is the race the most important part? I'm just not following why that's even part of the conversation. Does matter if the rapist is black?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/16 12:45 AM
1

In order for it to be a "Stanford study" then yes, it needs to be done by Stanford. How in the world is that very simple concept escaping you?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/16 12:39 AM
2

Well, you're saying black men are inherently more violent. Which is generally considered worse than being less violent, so...
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/16 12:37 AM
1

Why would we care what morons think? Guys who thinks vaginas get stretched out from a lot of sex are guys who aren't getting laid anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/16 12:35 AM
2

Well I'm certainly more familiar now. Wow.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/16 12:33 AM
1

Stretched out vaginas?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/16 07:15 PM
2

You're in your late 40's and been dating 18 year olds?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/16 07:11 PM
3

I really hope he says sexbots.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/16 07:08 PM
1

Are you saying black men are inherently different and worse than white men, so we should focus on that instead of the victim? Because it really sounds like that's what you're saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/16 07:03 PM
3

Why would race need to be mentioned at all? Unless you're trying to turn it specifically into a racial issue, there's no risk of being labeled racist. Saying, "violent rape is horrible and we should do something about it" is different than saying "violent rape is usually committed by black men so let's do something about them."
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/16 06:33 PM
2

I prefer if you not call me "babe". It's just weird coming from another guy. not to mention there was zero anger in my post. Everyone knows looks matter. Even teenagers. But I'm talking about the rp myth that women say looks don't matter. The only people who say looks don't matter, and this goes for men and women, are people who are saying THEIR looks shouldn't matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/16 01:14 PM
10

You really believe "terp" is on the same level as "cunt"? Does that mean i get to be all butthurt about you saying I'm an idiot? "Oh my gosh you guys. This big meany called me the meanest name a mean person has ever said. He called me an idiot. It seriously hurt my feelings. But at least he didn't call me terp. Boohoohoo."
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/16 02:44 AM
11

If you read much from the terps, you'll see a ton of hypocrisy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/16 02:09 AM
31

Slur? Really? I had no idea terps were so sensitive. Especially considering how freely they throw "slut", "whore" and "cunt" around.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/16 01:14 AM
15

If only 20% of women are attractive and only 20% of men are attractive, then why are terps so triggered by the supposed 80/20 rule?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/16 12:46 AM
1

Those are your "sources"? People trying to sell you shit? Come on man. You're clearly only seeing what you want to see. Most guys are getting laid. I'm sorry you're amongst the small minority that isn't, but it doesn't change the real world facts. Hot guys have the easiest time, no question. And they usually end up with the hottest girls. No one is questioning that. But the vast majority of people end up with people who are on their same level. Hypergamy and 80/20 and all those things you've bee…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/16 12:32 AM
1

Ahahaha. The National Review? Does that make Gawker a valid source too? Bahahaha!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/16 09:29 PM
1

Check the polls. You're wrong. And deliberately lying. Trump is universally considered the biggest liar in the politics. The reason you don't believe it is because you're also pathological. You believe your own lies as well. But the rest of the world, the people who are smart, and decent, and not racist/sexist assholes, don't believe your bullshit. But good luck with it. I cant wait to see your tears in November. It'll be hilarious to see the liars pissed off that people called them on their lie…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/16 09:11 PM
1

Oh, it it was sponsored and supported by Stanford? You might need to show some evidence of that to prove you're not a lying moron.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/16 09:07 PM
1

Republicans have wasted how much money trying to prove the myth of voter fraud? You've been duped. Bamboozled. Swindled. But it makes sense. You belong to the party of liars. You support the biggest liar for a candidate we've ever seen. And I'm sure you'll lie and say Trump isn't the biggest liar politics have ever seen, but, as we all know, you will be lying.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/16 08:07 PM
1

HE conducted a study. It wasn't a "Stanford study". Don't be a liar.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/16 08:03 PM
1

Haha! Seriously? You're calling that a Stanford study? Because one of the guys has a Stanford email address? Seriously. Be more dishonest.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/16 04:15 PM
1

Dude, there's a record of it! The vote! Don't be so dense.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/16 04:07 PM
1

It's not a "study" dipshit. It's an INVESTIGATION! Where is the results of the INVESTIGATIONS? You want to know what they are? 31. 31 instances of voter fraud in ove ONE BILLION votes cast. So what's the point? If IDs aren't needed to prevent voter fraud, because it doesn't exist, why insist? Oh yeah, because Republicans want to steal elections.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/16 03:42 PM
9

Just because the rest of the world doesn't see the person as conventionally attractive doesn't mean their partner isn't attracted to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/16 01:51 PM
1

That's complete horseshit. You honestly believe the only people getting laid are either 10's, rich or famous? Dude. There aren't really that many guys like that. Sute, those things make it easier to get laid, but so what? That doesn't mean it's all that difficult for guys who aren't one of those things. Girls are not all sleeping with those few guys. Looks around you. There are people coupled up everywhere. Are they all 10's, rich or famous? Nope.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/16 01:34 PM
1

If someone is getting rejected 100% of the time they're clearly not doing it right. What exactly do you think works? Nothing?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/16 10:50 PM
1

It's just not nearly as hard as you people think. Be interesting. Be a good person. Be able to read people. Be presentable. Thanks pretty much all there is to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/16 10:14 PM
1

Can you point to one source that says it's ever been 1-3%?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/16 07:41 PM
1

Source? Where is this rampant voter fraud?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/16 05:56 PM
2

If not having a government ID to vote hasn't been a problem,AT ALL, then why require it now if not to disenfranchise black voters? Voter fraud is a fake problem created by Republicans to suppress black votes. It's completely obvious to anyone who isn't a complete moron.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/16 04:28 PM
1

Ah yes, the old "I know you are but what am I" defense. A classic on the playground.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/16 05:22 PM
1

See you there sweetheart.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/16 05:21 PM
1

Ugh. You say "cuck" too? You're such a cliche. Do you terpers even know what words mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/16 05:20 PM
1

So you admit that conservatives have taken every single opportunity to criticize Obama whether deserved or not. Glad we have that cleared up.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/16 04:53 PM
1

You're just being purposely obtuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/16 04:50 PM
1

*Slow clap. Good for you champ. Wanna cookie?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/16 04:49 PM
5

That's no different than what women say. Most women say, "looks aren't the only thing that matters". The only people you really ever hear say,"looks don't matter at all" are people who want that to be true for themselves. They want THEIR looks to not matter. Almost everyone thinks looks matter. Of course they do. They matter to varying degrees for different people, but they still matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/16 12:44 PM
1

No one's entitled to hot women. But unattractive men DO sleep with hot women. And generally not in exchange for something. Talking purely casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/16 12:13 PM
1

Horseshit. Have known plenty of men, myself included, that have batted out of our league for casual sex. None of us are famous.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/16 12:11 PM
2

So "hot" is the only quality that matters to men? You speak for all men now?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/16 12:10 PM
4

You're free to be wrong. That's your right. Doesn't change the fact that most people are getting laid. And often times there's a disparity in attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/16 11:57 AM
1

So he keeps paying the old model while paying for the new model. Meet the new boss. Same as the old boss.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/16 05:28 AM
1

Nah. His third divorce will happen within 5 years. Put money on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/16 05:23 AM
1

More likely to happen if the guy isn't an orange asshole who's had to declare bankruptcy multiple times.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/16 05:21 AM
1

He's been "divorce raped" and declared bankruptcy how many times?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/16 05:19 AM
5

People like attractive and high value people. That's hardly a point of view unique to TRP. The point is that people who are seemingly lower value and less attractive still get laid. And often times with attractive, high value partners. Which goes againt TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/16 05:02 AM
1

Hahaha. Seriously? Conservatives have found any excuse to criticize Obama. Hell, they even called his fist bump with Michelle a "terrorist fist jab". Stop pretending conservatives have been reasonable with Obama. They jumped the shark a long time ago. Or do I need to shout "you lie" in order for my points to make sense to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/16 04:33 AM
1

Oh, congrats. You heard of the Republican "Patriot Act" before Snowden. Just like everyone fucking else. Nice try though, ya special little snowflake.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/16 04:29 AM
1

Republicans beat the birther horse over and over and over. Fuck, even Trump is a birther. And Cruz heard a few murmers about it. But are you honestly saying conservatives gave Cruz the same amount of bullshit as Obama? Come on man. Don't be so intellectually dishonest. You know goddamn well it wasn't even close to the same thing. The fact that the President of the United States even had to address the issue, after it was WELL established he was born in Hawaii, was embarrassing for all Americans.…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/16 04:27 AM
1

You're dodging the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/16 11:47 PM
2

Was the moon landing faked too? Was 9/11 an inside job? Conspiracy nuts are hilarious.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/16 11:46 PM
3

You weren't asked about black fathers. You were asked if you thought Obama would be criticized if he had the same history with broken families as Trump. Your response was a stereotype about black fathers. Very telling.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/16 11:45 PM
2

The topic was Obama. Your response was that black fathers are bad fathers. Therefore you think Obama is a bad father. Don't back peddle now pal. Own it if that's how you feel.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/16 10:07 PM
2

All politicians are criminals. Hell, you really think Trump hasn't done illegal shit? He's just wealthy enough to make it go away. You have it totally backwards. The republicans are the ones who fucked up. Hillary was beatable with a halfway decent candidate. Instead, the party of Lincoln chose Donald fucking Trump. A man who is actively trying to lose the election. You're living in a fantasy world if you think he's going to win. Way more people are going to begrudgingly vote for Clinton. They m…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/16 10:04 PM
2

How about the birthers? How about the conservatives who think he's a Muslim. How about the conservatives who think he "hates America"? Of course "every single conservative" was hyperbole, but the groups I mentioned? Hardly "tiny fringe". There is a LARGE percentage of conservatives who believe at least one of those wackadoodle notions.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/16 10:00 PM
1

Do you honestly believe Trump is going to win? Seriously?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/16 08:59 PM
1

Sweet deflection.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/16 08:56 PM
4

I doubt people would care except for a tiny fringe. If by "tiny fringe" you mean "every single conservative", then I agree with you. You were asked about Obama, and you brought up the topic of black fathers who abandon their kids. You specifically said "the difference" in regards to Trump vs Obama. Nice try, but you can't back peddle that easily. betas don't impregate multiple women typically Oh for fuck's sake. Are you really one of those "alpha male/beta male" idiots? I thought you were just a…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/16 05:59 PM
6

can you even imagine how the Right would have reacted if Obama had children from multiple mothers? Multiple divorces? An immigrant wife? To which you answered: The difference is he provided for his children, unlike many black fathers to abandon them or have limited contact/support. The question was about Obama. However you were clear to make there was a distinction because Trump "provided for his children" as opposed to "many black fathers". Well, he only mentioned one black father and you jumpe…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/16 05:23 PM
5

And if Obamahad multiple children from multiple marriages, but as long as he supported them financially, the right would have been all, "nothing to see here. What a good man"?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/16 03:26 PM
4

Their ability to live in their own fantasy world is absolutely astounding.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/16 03:24 PM
1

since women are attracted to them. Eh, not really. Maybe some women. But the type of guys with those traits and the type of women attracted to those traits are two peas in a pod. Like attracts like. And those types of people are not that common. Nor are they the types who attract non-sociopaths.
/r/askTRP10/08/16 03:08 AM
3

Oh I know some in the RP think that way, I'm just saying that anyone who actually thinks less of another person for crying is a piece of shit. Fortunately I think it's very few and far between. For either sex.
/r/askTRP10/08/16 02:46 AM
5

A person, man or women, who loses attraction or respect or anything because someone cries about losing a loved one is a piece of shit and a terrible person.
/r/askTRP10/08/16 02:19 AM
5

Sorry for your loss. Who gives a fuck about "frame"?
/r/askTRP09/08/16 11:58 PM
1

Doesn't mean it's not about boundaries. This is just the first time she's heard about him breaking it. Would you want your sister to marry a guy like that? In no way was that a "disagreeable boundary". He fucked up plain and simple. The sister should drop his ass.
/r/askTRP09/08/16 12:49 PM
1

How is that disagreeable? You don't think he has the same boundary for her? No way would he (or you) put up with your fiancé going into the back room for "touchy stuff".
/r/askTRP09/08/16 11:49 AM
9

I am easily top 10% You are easily overestimating yourself
/r/askTRP09/08/16 04:48 AM
8

You should have your sister's back on this. You even admit he fucked up. She's blood. He's a dick. Why is this even a question?
/r/askTRP09/08/16 04:45 AM
1

Deal with it. Bruh?
/r/askTRP08/08/16 08:33 PM
1

Here's another, I can keep them coming ALL DAY I would love that actually. I can just imagine you scrolling through all of your bookmarked articles trying to find the perfect one to send next. All the while getting more and more pissed off until you pop a blood vessel in your eye. And the only way you know to calm yourself down from such a hissy fit is to wear one of your mother's dresses and hump the stuffed animal your dad gave you before he abandoned you. Cunt. Stop. I can only fall so in lov…
/r/MGTOW08/08/16 03:54 PM
2

Your anger is just too wonderful. It makes me very happy. But your source, the one that is over 30 years old, says "in the previous year". Doesn't say they have no contact at all, ever. But more importantly, NOWHERE does is say it's because of supposedly feminist laws that prevent the father from seeing their kids. You're really reaching for something to support your idiotic notion that men have no rights AT ALL. How many of those fathers have no contact by choice? I'm sure you'll say very few, …
/r/MGTOW08/08/16 02:00 PM
3

How much did she cost?
/r/MGTOW08/08/16 02:28 AM
1

So your "source" for these supposedly "millions and millions" of men is a couple of Reddit subs? Ahahahaha! That's too precious. What about the source for the 1/3 of men that can't see their children because of laws? Is that also from anonymous Reddit users? You are too funny my friend.
/r/MGTOW07/08/16 11:45 PM
1

Source?
/r/MGTOW07/08/16 11:16 PM
1

See, that's your anger again getting in the way. I'm a guy. And I know you'll get super pissed about that fact and call me the hilarious names you people are so fond of. What is it, "mangina"? "White knight"? Or maybe my personal favorite prejorative, "cuck". Truth is, I'm not actually any of those things. I'm just a regular guy who can actually form relationships with women. i like them and they like me. I don't treat them poorly and I don't put up with them treating me poorly. That goes for me…
/r/MGTOW07/08/16 10:52 PM
1

Goddamn. You crack me up. For some reason I read everything you write and hear it in a high-pitch voice. Which makes it 100 times funnier. Who hurt you? Your mom? Your ex-wife?
/r/MGTOW07/08/16 07:50 PM
-1

Making your question irrelevant You've just been avoiding the question. Do you prefer a church that calls people sinners and tells them they're going to hell? Do you believe that was Jesus' message? "You've all sinners and fuck you you're going to hell"? You suggested I join Islam for absolutely no reason whatsoever. Which is why it's obvious your anger has made you completely irrational. Sounds like YOU admire Islam and want to convert. Is that what you're really getting at? today you have no r…
/r/MGTOW07/08/16 06:47 PM
-1

You seem like a very angry person. I'm simply asking if you think the CHRISTIAN Church should stop being about treating each other well and all the stuff Jesus said, or if it should be more like the Old Testament where everything was fire and brimstone and "fuck you you're going to hell you sinner"? And why would I want to join Islam? I think your anger has made you irrational because that doesn't make a damn bit of sense.
/r/MGTOW07/08/16 05:46 PM
-1

Your preference is for churches that tell you you're wicked and going to burn in hell?
/r/MGTOW07/08/16 03:42 PM
2

AWALT brah
/r/MGTOW06/08/16 07:22 PM
1

The shitty ring off ebay is the least of that guys problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/16 08:07 PM
1

16-22 is not the the peak attractiveness for women. But yes, men at 40 have a higher market value because their range is much larger. A 40 year old man can date anyone from 20+. A 20 year old man MAYBE can date someone up to her late 20's.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/16 03:21 PM
4

Lol. A grown man afraid of a little fucking blood.
/r/MGTOW05/08/16 02:33 PM
1

Periods, mother fucker. Ever heard of them?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/16 03:39 AM
9

Jesus, Greg. You walked right into that one.
/r/MGTOW05/08/16 03:36 AM
1

Or if people went to priests for marriage counseling. Can you imagine if people starting doing that? Nah. That would never happen.
/r/MGTOW05/08/16 03:30 AM
2

Very brave of you to admit you have no penis.
/r/MGTOW05/08/16 03:24 AM
2

Still lame. You should try to be funny instead. People really like that. Remember: Be funny. Don't be not funny.
/r/MGTOW05/08/16 03:23 AM
1

Still lame. You should try to be funny instead. People really like that. Remember: Be funny. Don't be not funny.
/r/MGTOW05/08/16 01:45 AM
1

Try less hard.
/r/MGTOW04/08/16 11:57 PM
-1

You can?
/r/MGTOW04/08/16 11:35 PM
4

Some guys are just that red pill that they bleed on schedule, brah.
/r/MGTOW04/08/16 11:33 PM
6

Dudes say it all the time. To people who matter. How many guys freak out when their wife or girlfriend buys tampons when they're at the store. How many guys act like little children when it gets brought up. Tons! It's not that big a deal. Blood isn't that big a deal. Do you really think most men amd women say "ew, gross" at a bloody nose or scraped knee? I don't know many. Grow up. It's blood. Get over it.
/r/MGTOW04/08/16 10:48 PM
5

Still trying too hard, pal.
/r/MGTOW04/08/16 10:18 PM
5

You're using that word "funny" wrong. It's supposed to elicit a laugh in order to be funny. You were trying too hard. That's why you failed.
/r/MGTOW04/08/16 10:10 PM
3

Did you really think it was funny? Like, clever funny or terrible sense of humor funny? The original story was boring and your attempt to be funny was lame. Congrats, I guess?
/r/MGTOW04/08/16 08:51 PM
6

Have you noticed the men here who said, "ew, that's gross"? It's not exactly unheard of.
/r/MGTOW04/08/16 08:49 PM
2

I meant excessive force. Any amount of force is excessive in rape. That's kinda the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/16 08:11 PM
14

It's like we would blame people for finding our shit gross Not really. If I'm wiping and get shit on my hand, I think that's really gross. If I get a cut and have blood on my hand, I don't think it's gross. Blood just doesn't gross me out.
/r/MGTOW04/08/16 05:46 PM
11

Meh. It's blood. Not exactly the end of the world. Are you just squeamish about blood?
/r/MGTOW04/08/16 05:43 PM
1

Divorce rape is second to illness as the cause of male bankruptcy / homelessness. Source? I'm actually curious about these statistics.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/16 02:02 PM
1

What do you think the law means? Majority of college rape accusations are born out of bad female orgasms, and discussions with female peers. That's probably the dumbest thing you've ever said. And you say a lot of dumb shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/16 06:14 PM
1

And yet people are getting married and starting families every day. Hardly seems "annihilated" based on that.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/16 06:12 PM
0

I know your paranoid rant is the prevailing thought on TRP, but do you ever read the responses from actual divorce and family law attorney's? They paint a FAR different picture than your "men are such victims" circlejerk.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/16 05:44 PM
1

You sound like you don't know what you're talking about. Show where in the text it says it provides protections "for women only" and I'll concede that I'm "nieve" [sic].
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/16 03:41 PM
1

Like I said chief, the laws protect women AND men. Have you actually read beyond the title or did you just assume it's for women only?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/16 12:45 PM
1

Yeah, it's assault. But if men started being charged with assault for grabbing a girls ass you would flip your shit and call it an overreaction. Not to mention the OP said he believed ONLY penetration required affirmative consent, which is obviously horseshit. No one is talk special privileges for women. Not a single one of those laws specify it's only for women against men. Your "female only law" argument doesn't hold water.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/16 11:59 AM
1

So you're saying that someone should not grab your junk unless you've given them your consent? That contradicts what you said in your post.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/16 07:55 PM
0

What would be the point of asking the question at all if the hypothetical person grabbing their junk was someone the WANT to grab their junk? The whole point is it's unwanted. As in, nonconsensual. Or, sans "affirmative consent".
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/16 03:42 PM
1

What if it was another guy? Same answer?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/16 03:12 PM
2

I love lamp
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/16 12:43 PM
1

So you think it would be okay for someone to just come up to you and grab your junk? You don't think you have to give your permission first?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/16 12:42 PM
1

Casual sex just means there's no commitment between the two people.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/16 11:45 AM
1

So an 18 year old has better options than a 25 year old. But she doesn't want to settle down so she just dates around. Then when she's 25+, she settles down with the best she can do, which also happens to be the worst she's had, because if she could do better, them she would have locked down a better guy, even though she wasn't interested in settling down when she supposedly had access to these better guys. Do you really not see the circular logic you're using here? I don't think there are many …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/16 09:17 PM
1

You're making a lot of leaps in logic to get to that conclusion though. It's a huge leap to say she isn't sexually attracted to him. It's a huge leap to say that she WANTED to marry any of the previous guys. It's just as easy to say that none of them turned out to be GOOD ENOUGH to marry after she got to know them, but No. 21 WAS. And guy no. 21 is the worst guy she's been with, because most women's relationship/sexual trajectories are downhill as they get older/more experienced. Probably the bi…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/16 08:31 PM
1

But your premise is based on an assumption that he's the "15th or 20th choice". Even if a woman has had sex with 20 guys, it's a big assumption that she wanted to marry every one of them and that all of them are better choices than the supposed "beta bucks". Unless you can demonstrate that she's settling with the worst guy she's been with, then you can't assume it's a terrible relationship where the get doesn't get sex or that there's nothing in it for him.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/16 07:46 PM
1

Within 48 hours, probably not. But overall, yes, most men can have casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/16 04:17 PM
0

Well said. I think that's one of the biggest weaknesses of the red pillers POV. That people never change. Unless they "swallow the pill". Then they change for the better. But no one else changes. Ever. But if they do, women are to blame.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/16 04:10 PM
1

Are you fighting this so hard because it would "shatter your world view"?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/16 04:06 PM
2

So men should have sex with any woman who wants to because incels exist? How does that make any sense ?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/16 05:58 PM
3

Obviously, you're not a golfer.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/16 04:47 AM
2

Haha! Right?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 09:08 PM
2

But less fucked up than if you had just lived with your dad. If she's as abusive as you claim, shouldn't have been too hard. Oh but wait, your a twerp. You guys believe men are the real victims of the world and nothing ever goes our way.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 08:14 PM
1

And how did that work out? Feel like your family was normal? I mean, if you lost your shit on your mom and call her abusive, then it's not exactly a "normal family" now, is it?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 08:08 PM
3

If you have to keep telling people they're misunderstanding you, then your communication skills are for shit. Christ almighty it's like talking to a baby.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 08:06 PM
1

A beta bux is someone a woman marries when she wants to settle down whose financially well off. You're dad settled down with her. An alpha would have just fucked her. He paid for her. So even if he didn't have money at the time, he paid with his commitment. And she simply waited until he had enough money to pay for her completely. Just because he wasn't well off, she saw him as her meal ticket. He committed. He from being her beta to her beta bucks. It's like you've never actually paid attention…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 08:03 PM
1

Manipulating a chick to stay isn't the same as tying her up in the basement, but does it's still fucked up and you're not exactly giving her free will to leave. Anymore than your dad had free will to leave, but couldn't for various reasons. He wasn't tied up in the basement, but he stayed even when he shouldn't have didn't he?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 07:54 PM
1

Well it's good that in 17 years of existence you've cultivated such a strong "common sense" muscle that we now have a paradigm shift away from how things have been done for thousands of years. "Common sense". Brilliant.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 07:51 PM
3

"Oh hurr hurr you're wrong hurr hurr insert insult here" I bet you're the dad bod type married to a 5/10 slightly overweight chubster. Look kid, you said "If you have the mindset that you're a truly awesome person whose being will enrich the lives of others, whether through sex or just your company, you can start to be the type of person who is successful." Just "being", doesn't enrich the lives of others. If you think it does, then you're just a narcissist who thinks you're better than everyone…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 07:48 PM
1

why she stayed with him She stayed because he was her ATM. AKA her Beta Bux. This is incredibly fucking obvious. But please, keep hamstering. It's adorable. It's difficult for a lot of men to get laid Meh. Not really. It's difficult for some. The vast majority of men get laid regularly. You seem like an angry little man whose angry that who aren't naturally good with game want to better themselves. Why would that make me angry? Because I'm apparently "natural"? Eh. Never really thought I was. Bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 07:42 PM
1

I figure the probability Sounds pretty scientific. I mean, who needs fact or figures as long as you "figure"?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 07:28 PM
2

Have a point if you want people to address it. Are you even listening to yourself? "Dread game"? "Soft next"? You're the exact reason why people make fun of TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 07:27 PM
3

Keep proving that you don't even understand the talking points you're regurgitating. Long way to go before you become a man, little guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 07:25 PM
3

That doesn't even make any sense. But go ahead an keep digging yourself deeper. It's pretty entertaining. It's mind boggling that someone can be so dense, but then I remember you're 17 and don't know a goddamn thing in the world, so it becomes entertaining again.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 07:23 PM
1

You clearly don't understand the red pill bullshit you've read. he isn't a beta bux You said your mom saw your dad as just an ATM. So he paid for her, correct? She didn't work? She spent "his money"? Beta bux. My dad had no problem with women in his youth. So what? Most guys don't have a big problem with women. Just because reddit has a few subs dedicated to losers, and just because the PUA twats can scam the same losers out of their money, doesn't mean it's a widespread problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 07:21 PM
1

Who the hell brought up Stockholm syndrome? What link? But if you want to talk survival instinct, the fear of being killed is a pretty goddamn strong motivator in an abuse victim. Threatening to leave an abuser almost always illicits a threat that they'll be killed if they do. You really want to risk it? And if things are so easy for victims, why are you still living with your supposedly "abusive" mother? Why are you bitching and whining about it instead of getting away? Hell, sounds kinda like …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 07:18 PM
2

I want you to remember this time in your life when you finally grow up. Believe me kid, you're going to think, "what the fuck was wrong with me? I was an idiot."
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 07:14 PM
1

Your dad was a classic definition of what you silly bastards call a "beta bux". Can't claim he's a red piller just because you're trying to change your narrative.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 07:13 PM
3

You're the one spewing the bullshit, champ. I'm just responding. Like I said, you're not going to be able to get yourself out of the hole you've dug. You've lost. Accept it and move on. Hopefully learn from it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 07:11 PM
4

I bet you're the dad bod type married to a 5/10 slightly overweight chubster. Cute kid. Don't worry. You'll lose your virginity soon. It's also garbage for those who don't even know what that looks like Everyone knows what that looks like. Everyone knows people who are well liked by both men and women. If you have the mindset that you're a truly awesome person whose being will enrich the lives of others, whether through sex or just your company, you can start to be the type of person who is succ…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 07:08 PM
2

Weren't you saying that your dad was too chicken to stand up to your supposedly abusive mom? You said he was "miserable and immaculated (did you mean emasculated?) by a wife who saw him as a doormat that was also fashioned as an ATM." But now he's red pill?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 07:01 PM
4

Brown. Cause you're full of shit. Blah blah blah.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 06:58 PM
3

It's a pretty major component. But hey, as long as you're getting your dick wet, who gives a shit how it effects other people, right brah?!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 06:58 PM
3

Holy fuckballs. You're saying her friend is partially responsible for her own murder? You're reading stories about women who tried to leave, who called the police, who had restraining orders, and yet, somehow the abuser still found them. Still beat them. Still tortured them. And in the case of her friend, KILLED HER. Please, explain to me what responsibility these women had for their situations. They tried to leave. Assholes still tormented or killed them. Seriously kid. You're completely talkin…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 06:56 PM
1

He was red pill. At 12. Un huh.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 06:50 PM
1

Found the virgin!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 06:47 PM
5

Red. Because you so alpha, brah!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 06:44 PM
2

You're sorry I feel the world doesn't revolve around your dick? Literally every single person agrees with me. Well, I'm in a long term relationship and my days of easy casual sex are behind me, but you want some advice? Be a person who others genuinely enjoy being around. Be good company. Be respectful. Be humble. Be funny. Be charming. Realize that it's not your world. You're but one person. Others do not exist solely for you to gain something from them. In other words, stop being a dick, kid.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 06:43 PM
2

Just manipulating?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 06:39 PM
1

How are you seriously not picking up on the fact that it's the LEAVING that makes the victims think they'll be killed? By staying, they get beat up. By leaving, they're afraid they'll be killed. What the fuck kind of choice is that? And you want to blame the VICTIM for all of this. Seriously kid. Shut the fuck up. You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. You can't imagine. Good for you. What a charmed life. But guess what? Unless you've been in that situation, you have absolutely n…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 06:32 PM
2

Well, you're so fond of blaming the woman for her abusive situation, why is this any different. You're out of your element Donnie.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 06:29 PM
3

I think it's pretty obvious you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 06:28 PM
5

Jesus. Fucking. Christ. Because the world does not revolve around your dick. Lying and manipulating, and ultimately emotionally abusing women just so you can get your dick wet makes you an asshole. Oh I know what you're going to say Kyle. Blah blah blah amoral. Nope. You're simply regurgitating the bullshit you read on TRP without actually understanding it. Seriously. Just stop. You're not going to be able to dig yourself out of the hole. You're just making yourself look younger and more immatur…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 06:27 PM
3

Manipulating, lying and cheating are all forms of emotional abuse, junior.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 06:20 PM
3

Jesus. Fucking. Christ.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 05:55 PM
1

some less than preferable circumstances Did you really just call domestic violence "some less than preferable circumstances"? Seriously kid, it's time to stop talking. I sympathize with your circumstances I'm certain you don't know what the word "sympathize" actually means. I simply cannot imagine You should have said simply that in your very first message and said nothing else.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 05:53 PM
2

What that her fault too? Should she have made sure better cops showed up?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 05:50 PM
3

Mission accomplished! Congrats Kyle.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 05:47 PM
3

Donnie, you're out of your element!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 12:46 PM
5

You're out of your element Donnie.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 12:38 AM
2

But that doesn't seem to be the case. He had a bit of a reputation and by all appearances dated around a lot. Then they started dated several years after they met. No idea where the 17 years came from. I think OP made it up.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/16 09:08 PM
3

Sir Chad of a bad boy sculptor, Conrad Shawcross "Bad boy sculptor"? What makes him a "bad boy"? when he wouldn't settle down And yet, this "bad boy sculptor" married a "post wall" woman. could've had so many women, but he languished in the friend zone for 17 years with one-itis So you believe he just remained celibate and waited for her? Seriously? his now wife was getting smashed in every orifice You mean "had sex with her boyfriend"? Gasp! What a whore!
/r/TheRedPill27/07/16 07:31 PM
3

People are not cars, friend. You're not buying a woman. This "women pay with sex, men pay with commitment" mentality is silly. Both people enjoy sex and both people make a commitment to each other.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/16 07:22 PM
3

It has nothing to do with equality. It has to do with sharing the same values. A woman who is saving herself for marriage is not going to want a guy who has banged a lot of women. That seems pretty obvious. Virgin women don't want a male virgin who doesn't want to be a virgin. But she's going to want someone who is saving himself, or at least has slept with very few women.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/16 07:20 PM
3

You're absolutely well within your rights to want a virgin bride. But one thing to realize is that those girls tend to want a virgin too. So unless you're saving yourself for marriage, you're probably going to be SOL. Water finds its level. Relationships with large partner discrepancies don't tend to last very long.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/16 06:22 PM
3

You wouldn't want to be him because his wife isn't a virgin? Seriously?
/r/TheRedPill27/07/16 05:46 PM
3

Yes, "letting other men fuck your woman" IS the definition. But if she's not his woman, then he can't be a cuck. "Retroactive cuck" isnt a thing.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/16 11:49 AM
2

Examples? You know nothing about me. But please, tell me about myself. This should be interesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/16 11:46 AM
1

Uh huh. Sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/16 11:45 AM
2

Based on what exactly? Your inability to get anyone to like you?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/16 04:43 AM
1

YOU don't get "panties wet". You talk about incels like you're not one of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/16 04:42 AM
1

Wow. That was all you could take issue with from an entire thread of messages mocking you? Stay virgin my friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/16 04:40 AM
2

What's the point of the wall? Or are you saying the immigrants aren't coming through tunnels and would be stopped by a wall? Again, the wall is all about the FEELZ. Not about reality.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/16 04:37 AM
2

Wait, how is he a cuck? His wife is banging other dudes?
/r/TheRedPill27/07/16 03:31 AM
1

When you say "they", you really mean "I". Isn't that why you're so "resolved to die a virgin"?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/16 02:54 AM
1

Wanna live dangerously? Drive drunk. Oh so edgy. I'm super impressed.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/16 02:51 AM
1

So Mexicans are now "bent on killing" us? Come on man. At least give me an argument that isn't based purely on emotion.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/16 02:22 AM
1

Wait, so you call her a "plate", meaning she's not the only girl you're fucking. But somehow you're upset she fucked another guy? Does she know you're fucking other girls?
/r/TheRedPill27/07/16 01:11 AM
2

"You serious Clark?"
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/16 01:04 AM
2

I love that he's assuming every girl who simply talked to him at a bar wanted to steal his precious virginity. "Get away from me bitch! Imma die a virgin!"
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/16 01:03 AM
1

Ha ha. Aren't you a sad little "victim"
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/16 12:04 PM
2

Don't worry, he's "one of the best men alive", so I'm sure they're all just horrible sluts who're beneath him. Imagine what a burden this guy carries around being "one of the best men alive".
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/16 12:00 PM
1

"The latter part is true though" = bad
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/16 11:54 AM
7

You incels are a messed up group. 18-20 year olds are not automatically more fertile or attractive. Stop watching porn and stalking high schoolers.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/16 04:20 PM
1

Goddamit incel. Get your creepy shit out of here.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/16 04:17 PM
2

That does not mean perpetual consent. If you really think you can force yourself on your wife anytime you want, it's a good thing no woman is ever going to marry you.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/16 02:13 PM
2

I thought you said they were guys bigger than you moving out of the way. Doesn't that mean they did actually put in the work to lift brah? But honestly, you're hilarious. Please post more stories like this. You're clearly the baddest of all the asses.
/r/TheRedPill23/07/16 01:38 AM
1

You won't find proof that men suffer from depression more than women, because the hard "proof" is that women are more likely to suffer depression. Just because men commit suicide more, doesn't mean they're more likely to suffer from depression. It just means they're more likely to commit suicide. Depression =/= Suicide
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/16 02:20 PM
1

"Girls all suck! Now read my tedious 100,000 word sidebar and drop down an endless rabbit hole of theological navel-gazing about a family of theory that doesn't even connect with any solid data for the most part" Nailed it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/16 02:09 PM
4

The Liberal-Globalist’s mindset is based on feelings. They object to Trump’s border wall first and foremost because it’s not "nice.” Whether or not this wall would solve a pressing national security issue is besides the point. Excluding others means feelz will get hurt, so a wall is simply out of the question. No. I don't think we should build a wall because it's stupid and won't work. Why waste $25 billion building a wall when a large portion of drugs and immigrants are coming through undergrou…
/r/TheRedPill22/07/16 02:04 PM
1

Go ahead and reject it all you want, but you're missing the point. The attraction is obviously there if a girl is sleeping with you. It's awesome when a girl is super attracted and "wiggly". But if you can't understand what I'm saying, then you're never going to be satisfied with your sex life. There are ups and downs. Ebbs and flows. If you're not communicating with your partner all the time and simply assuming you're her best every time, then you're going to be disappointed with the outcome.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/16 04:48 AM
1

Honestly, lose "cock carousel" from your vocabulary. That's going to be a good start. Typically sex gets better with time. Like you said, a connection matters. So the stronger the connection, and the more you get to know each other sexually, the better the sex will be. If you're dismissing girls because you feel like you weren't her best the first time out, you're probably missing out on the opportunity to eventually be her best.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/16 03:56 AM
2

So you're pretty much like most people who don't actually care about the other person's count? Good on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/16 03:33 AM
2

And I'm sure you've had girls who didn't. If you assume all girls want that, you're wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/16 02:30 AM
1

There's a huge difference between saying, "my preference is to be with a girl who hasn't been promiscuous" and saying things like, "Not everyone likes wifing up used cumdumps." One is a preference that no one has a problem with. The other is an intentionally dehumanizing statement that a lot of people take exception to. So no, it's not that anyone says you can't have preferences, it's that you get called out for how you express them. (Don't necessarily mean YOU specifically, talking about red pi…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/16 08:29 PM
1

Why would you assume that she would want a LTR with a guy who was lame in bed?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/16 08:17 PM
1

It was there...just in case.
/r/TheRedPill21/07/16 08:08 PM
1

Wait, something doesn't add up...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/16 06:19 PM
1

Suicide pact? You go first.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/16 06:10 PM
1

Oh believe me. That feeling is mutual. I have yet to see you say something that isn't stupid, crazy or total bullshit, so I'm glad to see we don't agree on a single thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/16 05:04 PM
5

Sweet brag, broseph. Was that a pr, brah?
/r/TheRedPill21/07/16 04:23 PM
1

This just reads like a list of how to be a good partner. The only way someone could see this as "non-pc" is if it had said, "do all this for a man but it's totally fine for the man to do none of these things for you." Men and women could improve their relationships if they both incorporated most of these elements.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/16 03:40 PM
1

Oh, so you're a sluthate fan. Now your whole deal makes sense. It's demented and sad, but I get it now.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/16 01:49 PM
2

So women who have had sex are simply cumdumps? That's...stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/16 01:45 PM
5

What's funny is he's gotta be talking about Pitchfork Festival which is 90% skinny teenage hipsters. But sure, the teenage girls were all looking at the old guy. But not for the reason he thinks.
/r/TheRedPill21/07/16 12:09 AM
9

How is he going to "get a taste of the red pill soon"? They're both pieces of shit and will probably only ever be pieces of shit. You think he's going to magically stop being a piece of shit because he's a loser and she cheats on him?
/r/TheRedPill20/07/16 07:40 PM
9

So i fucked most of them in rage and cummed on their faces. Right there in class? Was it on the pussy spaceshit? Way to alpha, brah.
/r/MGTOW20/07/16 07:35 PM
1

Sounds like incel fantasy.
/r/askTRP20/07/16 04:52 PM
19

Was this your first time at a festival in Chicago? People let people pass all the time. Not because they're intimidated, but because that's just festival etiquette for people who aren't assholes.
/r/TheRedPill20/07/16 04:02 AM
-8

I'm not sure it's even a humble brag. Sounds like TRP fan fiction.
/r/TheRedPill20/07/16 03:53 AM
2

Are you really saying it's better for teens to have kids? Do you have a source for increased risk of birth defects between teens and the 40+ crowd?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/16 01:49 AM
2

Oh please. Generation X was called lazy, entitled and obnoxious. Hell, so were the Baby Boomers. I'm not the biggest fan of millennials, but don't act like Gen X didn't drive people crazy too. Don't pretend the Baby Boomers didn't invent "tune in and drop out" mentality.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/16 01:46 AM
1

That's still an increase in the working population. Not exactly "non child having asses".
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/16 01:39 AM
2

Agreed. A lot of friends just give each other shit about stuff because they know each other so well. But most friends also know what buttons not to push and also know their friends will be there for them when they need it. That goes for girl AND guy friends. The ones who are the real assholes ONLY give shit to their "friends" and can never be counted on. The constant shit talkers are generally only tolerated.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/16 01:20 AM
1

Have you ever had a ONS that involved anal? I'm not sure there's a lot of instances of letting "a rando fuck you up the ass."
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/16 06:16 PM
1

Well, how do you know she enjoyed it with Chad? Just because she did it? Or how do you know her tastes just haven't changed? Or why do you even care since you don't even like anal? She fucked Chad once. She's fucked you a bunch of times. You win. Her asshole isn't the prize.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/16 05:44 PM
1

But if she enjoyed it in the past but is now all chaste and innocent, it definitely feels insulting. Like I'm not good enough. But you don't even like it! And she's no longer into it. So what in the world does it matter? You've got to let go of that insecurity. There's no faster way for a relationship to go downhill than to be so insecure. But if sticking it in your girlfriend's butt, an act neither of you enjoys, is so important, then why would you even stay in the relationship? It doesn't make…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/16 05:26 PM
1

And I don't like being denied the possibility... I get insecure when someone who supposedly thinks I'm the best for her does not want to go as far with me as she did with somebody else. But if neither of you is into anal, why does it matter if you're not doing it? Isn't it more important to do things you both, or at least one of you, enjoys? Just because she's done it before, somehow that makes you less of a man? Relationships are about more than sex. She can have sex with a guy and not want a r…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/16 05:09 PM
1

That's...an answer, I guess. Men don't exactly feel much unless they're attracted to the women either. I do not understand the RP obsession with anal. It's either that none of you have actually done it, or you think it's something you have to do in order to dominate/humiliate the girl. I've had more than a handful of ONS, but anal is not exactly something that's been on the table. That's usually reserved for someone who you've been sleeping with for a while. But you still didn't really answer th…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/16 03:51 PM
1

Wait, so you truly believe that all women have hot, enthusiastic anal sex on the first date if the dude is a Chad? Seriously?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/16 03:08 PM
1

Since when is rape necessary for survival?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 11:45 PM
2

Or just assume it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/16 10:38 PM
1

You're assuming that women are unhappy just dating or being fbs? Because I've seen studies that say men are more likely to want commitment out of those situations.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/16 10:33 PM
0

Men are just as happy, if not happier now. And th MGTOW "movement" has nothing to do with it. The number of men "going their own way" is minuscule so that obviously doesn't account for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/16 07:11 PM
7

No but you made sure to shoehorn every talking point into your long and rambling post. Your bitterness can be seen from space.
/r/MGTOW16/07/16 06:46 PM
1

Terrorists can and will continue to do what they're doing, but in no way is that the same as a war and in no way is that a strategy to defeat the rest of the world. Their goal is disruption if the West. No Western country is at risk of having to surrender to ISIS. Like I said, they're not about to take over shit. And dude, people don't believe you because you've set up your little red pill fantasy way too perfectly. You, at the age of 19, have somehow managed to become what every sad red piller …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/16 02:21 PM
0

Thank you for showing me the raw data from the study. What it actually shows is that men and women's happiness tend to go up and down together over the long haul. It also shows that men have not become unhappier the more women have agency or the more they supposedly get "raped" of their resources. Of course it's circular logic. That's the point. It completely flies in the face of the red pill and MGTOW argument that men are pissed off about an unfair society and that either movement is actually …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/16 02:11 PM
7

Wow. You win the sad bastard bingo with that post.
/r/MGTOW16/07/16 06:57 AM
4

So you're saying a patriarchal culture that rapes is somehow better, simply because they're patriarchal? That's a pretty fucked-up point of view.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/16 06:34 AM
1

It matters to the argument though. If women are supposedly unhappier, them why are men supposedly happier according to the same studies? The whole MGTOW is so minuscule that it wouldn't account for the difference. And the red pill argument that men are discriminated against with child support laws and alimony laws runs counter to the argument of those studies.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/16 06:31 AM
5

Yet, the same article says men are happier now than when society was more patriarchal. A big part of the argument for why women are unhappier is because of the rise of single mothers. The red pill mentality is that men are "raped" with child support for the benefit of single mothers. In fact, the red pill argues the women get pregnant on purpose just so they can extract resources from men. So if women are getting what they supposedly want (resources from men), and men are being "raped" for those…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/16 06:25 AM
2

The Middle East isn't on the verge of taking over shit. In fact, their patriarchal cultures are losing control as modernization and democracy takes hold. And which Asian cultures are you referring to? Women are no longer subservient if you ask people who live there. The fantasies about docile, submissive Asian women has been disproven again and again. Even your own bullshit stories about the girl you're supposedly dominating are so far-fetched you red pill brothers know you're full of shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/16 06:17 AM
1

But to your original point, where is it proven women are more attracted to non-feminist men? That's not a point that can be conceded.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/16 06:09 AM
4

But aren't the rapes being committed by men who come from heavily patriarchal cultures?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/16 05:57 AM
1

What? Are you saying that men aren't more predominantly the clientele for rub and tugs? I had no idea it was sexist to admit that fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/16 05:53 AM
1

Well, to be fair, "Red Pill Man" is quite often used as an insult as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/16 04:38 PM
1

I try to strike up a convo to get his name Your buddy gets attacked and you just ask the guy his name? Seriously? "Top o' the morning sir. But I see you gave my mate a right good ass kickin'. Mind telling me ya' name for the bobbies?"
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/16 04:37 PM
0

You're focusing on the vandalism and discounting the "Forced. Intercourse." part. If she said no and he continued, that's rape. It's not "breaking through her LMR" or whatever you tell yourself. It's rape. Plain and simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/16 04:35 PM
1

He's red pill. Everything is about feminism and how it has destroyed society. Rape isn't a big deal. Women are all lying whores who just want to ruin men.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/16 04:14 PM
1

But it's a common red pill mantra that looks are all that matters.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/16 11:39 PM
1

Silly woman. Don't you understand? Your tiny feeeeemale brain can't possibly understand women as well as a true, big dick swinging, alpha-as-fuck red piller. I mean, do you even lift?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/16 05:21 PM
1

an artificial womb is a guaranteed logical step logical Pretty sure you're using that word incorrectly.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/16 05:05 PM
2

Have you ever actually seen a hot hobo?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/16 05:02 PM
3

You speak for all men now?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/16 08:08 PM
3

Maybe he just thought you were an ungrateful little shit and didn't want to give it to you.
/r/MGTOW11/07/16 07:02 PM
2

I say this after having sucked countless dicks and fucked many assholes. Dude, you're clearly bi-sexual at the very least.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/16 06:14 PM
2

He's a red piller on the internet. How can you possibly think he's lying? Those guys have magic dicks that build civilizations and cure lesbianism. So of course he can give a woman 20 orgasms in a row without stopping. Magic Dick. Only available where the Red Pill is sold.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/16 03:11 PM
4

Escorts seem to say the exact opposite. The awkward unattractive guys, whom I presume you're referring to with "beta, are focused on the sex. The attractive ones, or your "alphas" focus on companionship and intimacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/16 03:03 PM
3

Found the rapist.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/16 02:35 PM
0

Is that really inevitable? Or is it going to happen in the lifetime of people discussing it?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/16 07:18 PM
7

But they've hit the market already, and the assumption is that women are currently freaking out about it. I'm with OP, I haven't seen any women freaking out and the robots don't look human at all. And certainly not anything close to a "perfect 10".
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/16 07:08 PM
4

I don't really agree. They look like...robots.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/16 06:52 PM
5

Are sex robots "perfect 10's"? I don't think that counts.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/16 06:40 PM
1

Lost it? I'm cool as a cucumber baby! I think it's obvious which one has lost it. Hint: the guy with all the bottled up anger towards women and the world. I just figured I should give the songs that are appropriate for your tragedy. The worst tragedy ever known to mankind. Divorce! Swing low, sweet chariot Comin' for to carry me home
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/16 11:43 PM
9

Who somehow already know how to fuck like porn stars.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/16 09:30 PM
1

Hey, it's clearly working in his dreams. But, only his dreams of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/16 08:58 PM
1

Nobooooody knowwwwws the trouble I've seen Nobooooody knowwwwws but Jesus Nobooooody knowwwwws the trouble I've seen Glory Hallelujahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/16 02:04 PM
2

Yes. Only red pill men have ever had bad shit happen to them. It's the worst thing that has ever happened in the history of mankind. I mean, marrying and subsequently divorcing a "western woman"? My god man. That's some real shit there. Fuck genocide. You got divorced. Way worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/16 01:57 PM
2

That's not the reality where I live. Nor anyone else I know. You guys haven't become some enlightened creatures. You don't have some true vision of how things really are. It's called the red pill because a bunch of bitter men saw the Matrix too many times and decided that they needed a name for their supposed victimhood. So women are to blame and must be punished or whatever. The reality is you're only making things worse for yourselves. Women and so-called blue pillers are happy to go about the…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/16 11:56 AM
1

"Only a reckless man would want to sustain the risk of marriage to a Western woman. This part of the species is beyond redemption. Hypergamy." That's a very toxic mentality. And one that is clearly bringing you nothing but anger and bitterness. The reality you've created in your mind sounds like a scary place.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/16 01:33 AM
2

72% of women initiate divorces so that means women as a whole are out to get men? There are a ton of reasons why divorce may be necessary. Yet you make the leap that 90% of women get divorced because they want to extract as many resources from the man as possible? My own divorce was nothing like you describe. It wasn't working and would never work. So we split our assests and went our separate ways. No one I know has been a victim of "divorce rape" as you people so eloquently put it. Sure, it ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/16 06:59 PM
1

Source? Where did the 90% figure come from? Haven't found anything close to that.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/16 01:58 PM
1

Source? Or pulled out of your ass?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/16 03:32 AM
1

Where are you getting that 90% from? I've never seen a figure higher that the 60's. And you act like women just initiate the divorce for no reason. You really think all women get divorced because they're bored or have found someone they think is better?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/16 05:43 PM
1

do you really assume that all men are fundamentally trustworthy? Just because you've had a few bad experiences with women doesn't make all women unworthy of trust and respect. That's some seriously flawed thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/16 03:33 PM
1

Presence of a "female body" IS the real thing. And I'm not sure you could easily manage. Sounds like you're bitter and afraid. Which I get, coming out of a divorce. But you've got to get over the anger. Women aren't out to get you, or me, or any other men.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/16 01:20 PM
1

Sounds lonely.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/16 01:05 AM
1

And how has been working out WITH the prejudgment?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/16 12:45 AM
1

That's a defeatist attitude. If you're going into a relationship trying to "win" or trying to "not lose" because you're afraid the women is just trying to exploit you, then the relationship is doomed. It's a self fulfilling prophecy. I know the RP attitude is this way. Those drawn to that philosophy see relationships through that lens. But relationships don't have to be that way when you find the right person. The problem is that even if you find the right person, you're going to assume she's tr…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/16 06:51 PM
1

But that's if you see all relationships as adversarial. Something that is won by one person and lost by the other. Successful relationships are best viewed like you're both playing on the same side of the board. The opponent is all of the pitfalls common to relationships. The two of you have to figure out how to beat the opponent together.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/16 03:33 PM
1

Okay, fair enough. Didn't realize you were 18. That makes sense. I guess it depends on the age what would be considered a high count.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/16 04:23 AM
1

I guess I'm wondering what's considered a high count.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/16 11:37 PM
1

14% are virgins. Not incel. Many of those 14% are in relationships. Not incel. Many of them have had other forms of sex beside intercourse. Not incel. You have a narrow definition but now you want it to include everyone who's a virgin so that your number doesn't look so ridiculous? I don't particularly want to keep arguing about this with you. You think I'm making up a number and I think you're making one up. Agree to disagree. It doesn't actually matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/16 08:12 PM
3

You yourself said that women can't be incel. And 40,000 subscribers, most of whom are women, doesn't even come close to the "hundreds of thousands" you claim. And you were the one who said there was a very specific definition. People who turn down dates don't count in your words. You definition is men who would date or have sex with ANYONE who was willing but can't make it happen. If there are "hundreds of thousand" who fit that definition on resdit, where are they? Because it seems like the sam…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/16 07:24 PM
5

If women had full size sex robots people would absolutely think that was weird. You can't compare a vibrator to a sex robot. A fleshlight maybe. But does anyone care if a dude has a fleshlight? They may get a roll of the eyes, but I doubt anyone would care. But most men don't need a toy. The hand works just fine. A lot of women can't climax with just their hand, so they use an aid.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/16 06:51 PM
0

How dare you come up in here asking for proof and logic. He knows what all women want. He's never actually spoken to one about what they want, but goddamit he just knowwwwwws!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/16 06:47 PM
2

Right, according to you there are "hundreds of thousands" of incels on all of reddit. I would love to see your math. How did you arrive at that figure?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/16 05:24 PM
3

Excuse me, do these effectively hide my thunder?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/16 12:52 PM
3

I think you should look at the number of people who post/subscribe that don't identify as incel. Or the number of inactive subscribers. If you truly look at the postings, you'll see the same users over and over. There are not hundreds of thousands of incels on reddit. Nice try though.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/16 12:48 PM
6

Hundreds of thousands?! I think you mean dozens.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/16 03:32 AM
1

Sure, there's a lot of guys who won't cross that line. But the ones who do, start off with the assumption that it's okay to manipulate women as long as they're getting off. They don't see women as people, they seem them as a means to sexual gratification. And that is the type of thinking, whether rapist or manipulator, is what we as men should be not only discouraging but actively trying to change.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/16 01:53 AM
4

Again, I'm not talking about women you're already in a relationship with. That's an entirely different conversation. What I'm referring to is the dating and pickup techniques they employ. And the whole "spinning plates" bullshit they seem so fond of. The alternative is to just be a decent human being who sees women as decent human beings. So much of the Incel and red pill mentality is so angry and bitter towards women that it becomes a self fulfilling prophecy. Being angry with women is guarante…
/r/ExRedPill01/07/16 01:49 AM
4

I mean a "no" in a sexual way. When they're trying to get a girl to sleep with them for the first time and don't take no for an answer. I see what you're saying, but so much of what brings guys to TRP is anger towards women. Married RP is different, except for the men who control or try to "dread game" their wives. That shit is messed up.
/r/ExRedPill01/07/16 12:31 AM
1

And my point was that "scummy" is downplaying it. I didn't call it rape, did I? I said rapey. As in, it's heading down that road. And you're simply focusing on what part of what I said, totally ignoring everything else. Or are you saying you agree that the type of guy who manipulates his way into sex is they type of guy is likely to commit actual rape down the road?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/16 11:50 PM
3

Mostly their ideas about not taking no for answer. Assuming women just want to not "seem like a slut" so they refuse to respect boundaries. Also the idea that they need to out-Alpha other guys. So they go out looking for trouble. It's not directly promoting violence, but the ideas they promote, in the hands of guys predisposed to violence is a bad idea. I also object to the idea that guys need to dominate or control women. To them, all women need a leader or whatever. I know they promote it as s…
/r/ExRedPill30/06/16 10:56 PM
1

Ha. Good on you. I do enjoy these asshats having their stupid theories blown to bits. They'll never admit it though. They either cut and run or just spew even more insane shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/16 10:50 PM
2

It's a fruitless endeavor. There is zero logic to what he's saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/16 10:32 PM
1

Typo, meant "is not okay" obviously.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/16 10:31 PM
1

Guys who have the mentality that it's okay to manipulate a girl to perform sexual favors for him are the ones who are the most likely to commit actual rape in the future. They see the girl as a means to their own pleasure and little more. They're the type of guy to bang a girl who's fall down drunk or unconscious because again, their own sexual gratification is what matters most. To say it's simple "scummy" is to downplay what they've done wrong. Calling them out and telling them that in uncerta…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/16 10:11 PM
1

Basically what he's saying is that he believes women completely lack any kind of logic and only act on emotion. To him, like a lot of red pillers, all women will falsely accuse a man of rape because she perceives the guy is beneath her or a "loser". Which is kinda ironic, because there's absolutely no logic in his theory and is simply based on what he perceives to be true. Even though it has very little basis in reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/16 10:05 PM
1

Being guilted into performing a sexual act isn't rape exactly, but it's not completely consensual either. Anyone who say's a girl "owes a bj" or uses what the delightful red pillers call "dread game" to get sexual favors is a piece of shit. Sure it's not technically rape, but it's definitely rapey.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/16 09:57 PM
3

The whole Red Pill/manosphere subculture would be sad funny if it wasn't so scary. A lot of the ideas end of up being life altering (in a bad way) for the dude, to downright dangerous to the people he encounters. Fortunately most if them hide behind their keyboards and would never actually say or do the things they talk about online, but once in a while you get a wildcard. And even the ones who wouldn't act out in real life just end up bitter, hating life.
/r/ExRedPill30/06/16 08:52 PM
1

Was that English? Or is there some sort of Idiot to English translation you put that through for me?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/16 08:47 PM
1

I didn't call coercion rape, I just said you can't exactly call is consensual. It's definitely a gray area.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/16 08:45 PM
1

Because a few dollars is a few dollars. Rape is rape. If someone robs you of a few dollars, that shit kinda sucks and I might feel a little bit violated, but I'm going to get on with my day. If someone rapes me, I'm not going to be able to get on with my day. You can't seriously think that they're the same exact thing. Either you overvalue money, or you really don't see rape as a big deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/16 08:28 PM
6

Top notch answer.
/r/ExRedPill30/06/16 06:24 PM
1

Leagues are real...to a point. There are plenty of women who like guys who are unconventionally attractive. Including bigger guys. Or, are willing to be with a bigger guy who's confident, funny, genuine etc. The girls I've been with have liked (or loved) me for me. Be fun, kind and interesting. Be a catch. That's really about 75% of the battle. Sure, looks can help a lot, but they're certainly not everything. And I guarantee you it's far more acceptable to be a big guy than it is a big girl. No …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/16 06:16 PM
3

You can't really compare few bucks and sex though, can you?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/16 05:54 PM
1

If you consented to having her put her fingers in your ass but she decided to stick a baseball bat up there instead, then yes, that's rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/16 05:36 PM
1

Okay, but that's not exactly where these supposedly rampant false rape allegations are stemming from. If a girl, who you're not in a relationship with, doesn't want to have sex, pushing and pushing until she reluctantly relents isn't exactly consensual. Again, it's probably best to error on the side of not rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/16 04:22 PM
1

Girls get "confused" and "coerced" all the time Then it's not exactly consensual. Not saying it's full on rape, but it's certainly not consensual. Best to error on the side of not rape. There's like a 99 percent chance the guy is just going to beat you up and rape you anyway. Huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/16 04:20 PM
4

What is "consensual but unwanted sex"? If it's unwanted, how can it be consensual?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/16 01:25 PM
1

I'm an obese man and I've slept with plenty of women. And almost all of them were very thin. And I've known plenty of men who are the same. Your theories don't really hold water. Plus, there are plenty of obese women who are unable to get dates. You're buying into the incel way of thinking. Where men have it worse and it's all the fault of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/16 12:39 PM
1

That's all speculation. And flimsy at best. Obesity rates have increased for women as well. Are female incels increasing in number also? Really, what you're seeing is more exposure to it because of the internet. It's the same with the news. If you watch the news or read it online, you'd think everything and everyone is trying to kill you. But the fact is, violent crime is at all time lows.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/16 01:29 AM
1

Are you saying you don't have feelings? Dude. That's messed up. Are you sure you're human and not some sort of computer that's gained consciousness?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/16 12:30 AM
2

Yes, I'm sure that's it. People become Transgendered to make their lives easier. Because, really, who has it easier than Trangendered people?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 05:46 PM
1

I don't know that there even is an increased incel population. But to many incels, women should not be allowed to choose for themselves. All decisions should be left up to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 04:57 PM
2

Well, technically he didn't invent it either. He refined it into radio waves. But wireless technology, especially Wi-Fi, are based on the principals of her frequency hopping invention.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 03:55 PM
1

It's hilarious that you used "Wireless communication" facetiously, because yes indeed, an invention by a, get this, WOMAN was responsible for it. Hedy Lamarr.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 03:29 PM
1

I think there are a lot of guys with deep issues/underconfidence on the red pill. That pretty much sums it all up. Most of them aren't getting laid, and the ones who actually do once in a while, create "Field Reports" to exaggerate to the rest of the thirsty "alphas". Can you imagine being so blown away that you actually got laid you felt the to brag about it on the internet? That's how you know most of them are exaggerated, if not completely made up. People who have sex regularly don't feel the…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 03:24 PM
1

I believe he was sarcastically making fun of the sad, dateless Nice Guys, Neck Beards and Incels who think the 9 or 10 should lower their standards, while they themselves would never dare to do such a thing. So, you know, fuck Chad and all that nonsense. Feeeeemales only want the top 10% of cocks and blah blah blah.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 02:58 PM
1

If a guy can't find someone who wants to date him, sure I'm sympathetic to the point of saying, "dude, that really sucks." But not to the point where I think that women don't deserve their own sexual agency. And that's kind of the underlying point of OPs question. He doesn't come right out and say, "should women have sexual freedom", but merely asking the question means he has serious doubts that they should.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 02:53 PM
1

Or by guys pretending to be good guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 02:49 PM
1

But it's not dangerous if deception has occurred. It's a sexual violation.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 12:51 AM
1

Like, for example, if had been out drinking and met a girl who offered you a blow job. But after the fact you found out this chick had a dick. Would you feel violated or no, because you had consented to it, so no big deal? Just say thank you and go about your business?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 12:06 AM
1

https://rapebyfraud.com/state-by-state-information-on-rape-by-fraud/
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/16 10:09 PM
1

People can be charged for lying in order to obtain consent. It's commonly called, "Rape by Deception". If the person would not have consented to the sex knowing it was being filmed, then it's likely a crime.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/16 07:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter