TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Too_Many_Cats Archive

View 1 post and 50 comments by Too_Many_Cats on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

Too_Many_Cats/r/MensRights29/11/12 06:35 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

This sub makes a some good points, and I'm very much in favor of egalitarianism, but if you haven't noticed the occasional female-bashing, you have been reading with some interesting glasses on. The Men's Rights sub has the same problems as Feminism does at the extremes.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 07:05 PM
0

What makes this statement interesting is that this is also exactly my experience with female MRAs. They come in wanting to be egalitarians and help with some men's issues they have heard about. Then they get a taste of some of the comments on here and decide "MRA" might not be the correct label for them. It seems difficult for either group to keep the "I just hate the other gender" types from latching onto the edges.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 05:09 PM
5

Well, they are trying to get hits for the book, and though it is unfortunate, this place would be a good spot to get hits. Everyone likes to pretend there are only egalitarians here for "the cause," but I'm sure quite a few traditionalists have popped in here and decided they like the direction MRA is going as well.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 03:44 PM
0

I highly suggest you post this in /r/feminism or /r/askfeminists instead if you want real responses. The only response you are going to get here is about how evil feminists are trying to dominate men unfairly and cause the complete collapse of society as we know it.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 11:00 PM
-6

Okay? I admit to not being able to click the link, but just because the Y chromosome is mostly junk DNA and oddly designed doesn't mean the messenger telling you about it is trying to oppress men. The human kidney is also very oddly designed, but I don't hear you accusing biologists mentioning this of being "anti-kidney."
/r/MensRights02/04/13 10:53 PM
1

Go all in. Roofies, bondage, left in ditch afterwards, the whole bit. I'm genuinely curious to see if the man gets 10+ more years than the woman does.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 03:52 PM
-1

Was this before or after they invented circumcision and came out in vast numbers to protest support for it? Also, TIL protesting vaginal genital mutilation in Islamic countries is bad if the person doesn't go out of their way to also protest circumcision as well. Remind me again, when was the last thread an MRA posted about protesting female genital mutilation? Because, clearly, posting about circumcision without mentioning females as well automatically means every MRA everywhere must secretly s…
/r/MensRights02/04/13 03:41 PM
7

I've never in my life heard that women are the driving force for circumcision or that women are "known" to prefer cut males sexually. To my knowledge, the largest driving force behind circumcision is still religion.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 03:24 PM
-3

Yeah, I don't understand why feminists invented circumcision when they themselves protest against mutilation. I also agree that they always find one group of people that they think clearly causes all the problems of the world and blame everything they can on it. What kind of messed up mindset does someone have to have to do that? All those feminists protesting in favor of circumcision are a real problem!
/r/MensRights02/04/13 02:54 PM
2

Why do I always get the impression that these posts don't tell the whole story? I highly doubt you were banned anywhere just for trying to prevent male suicides.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 02:47 PM
3

Because women the real, instinctive "natural caregivers?" I can't tell if they are trying to be sexist against women or sexist against men in that clip. 2 for 2? Quite the feat.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 02:34 PM
2

The problem with rights movements is that they inherently attract the extremists as well. I'm sure if you asked, most of the individuals like your grandfather would happily support MRA and proclaim themselves MRA activists. The trick is to try to get your mother to see that there is a difference between bigots who think a movement "swings the right way" for them and people who genuinely hold the ideals of the movement.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 12:31 AM
2

Yeah, feminists are really welcome here. I'm sure they can feel the love.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 12:25 AM
6

Next time someone murders someone close to you, I'll be sure to feel more sorry for the murderer's future in jail than for the life that was lost. They didn't even mention the victim. It was so much crying about those "poor boys" that raped her. Also, LOL at you only thinking it's "those feminists" who noticed this. The coverage of this story was absurd, and far more demographics than just "feminists" are angry at this.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 03:42 AM
2

It's more linguistic hair-splitting. These kinds of activists are really irritating. Similar "issues" may include talking about "helping our boys" in the military clearly referring to all military individuals and not just males and "he" being the frequent default pronoun in English. All that ranting over just wording is silly. Everyone knows what meaning was meant to be conveyed.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 03:24 AM
10

The choice of whether or not to have an abortion is obviously the woman's because her body is the one affected. No one should be able to force someone to do something they don't want with their own body. Now, as to whether or not the man should pay for the baby or not gets complex. He should have the option during the pregnancy to say he isn't going to pay for the child, but likewise he should also be denied access to the child in such a situation. You can't have it both ways. Either the father …
/r/MensRights20/03/13 03:16 AM
2

Can you all please stop turning this subreddit into a women-bashing club rather than a Men's Rights forum? There is nothing in your statement to suggest that the officer was a jackass simply because the target was male. In addition, if it had been a male officer you wouldn't even be posting this. "This WOMAN did something bad to a MAN" scenarios are not automatically Men's Rights issues unless the reason the man was abused was because he was male.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 08:10 PM
15

That's not feminists. That's women in general. A lot of women, and even some men, seem to not understand that doing things to someone's genitalia without their permission is rape regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 08:04 PM
1

I think it is fairly clear that they did it. They had pictures up on facebook and posted tweets about it on twitter. They even confessed. Please get over it. Their football careers are not as important justice for that poor girl, and saying she was passed out so "didn't say no" is an absurd defense. They did it; they belong in prison.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 07:26 PM
-7

And, if your coworker had been a man, this wouldn't have been posted on /r/mensrights at all. This has nothing to do with men's rights, and it is why people frequently equate this forum with camouflaged female hate. I have no doubt that if someone went on /r/feminism and posted about how "This MAN did something mean to me this one time! Look! Look!" everyone here would be raging at the implication that "men" = "bad."
/r/MensRights10/12/12 04:47 PM
-1

Have any men attempted to call the number? Maybe they would help men too; they are just assuming it is women. I don't see how this is much different from feminists getting pissed off every time the military says "men, we need everything you have here" or "donate to help out our boys overseas." Everyone knows these things are referring to members of the military in general; they aren't going to single out only males to give aid to. Yes, these gender assumptions are annoying and could use some cor…
/r/MensRights08/12/12 10:58 PM
3

cite please
/r/MensRights29/11/12 08:46 PM
2

Screenshotted for "women" before one of your friends can remind you to change your wording to "radfems" code. Not that you all were really fooling anyone anyway.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 02:27 AM
53

Men's rights isn't a reaction to feminism; it is a reaction to discrimination against men. There are many forms of discrimination against men that do not have roots in feminism, and there are many forms of feminism that do not promote discrimination against men. It is best to not get the two confused.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 06:10 PM
-32

Then she would just be considered a "slut" for dressing that way, and the rape wouldn't have even made the news. Honestly, the most interesting thing about this case is that the same exact reasoning used to defend rapists in the case of females being raped is being used here, except suddenly men care. I also find it interesting that somehow no one here thinks he might have secretly wanted it and/or is making up the rape story. Where are all of the "90% of rape allegations are fake" people now?
/r/MensRights28/11/12 03:55 PM
-6

Ah, yes, this is the same reasoning used when people say "she was asking for it" in defense of rapists. It happened to a man this time, so suddenly those people now think it is a stupid argument.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 03:53 PM
4

1) breitbart 2) What does Sandra Fluke have to do with equal rights for men?
/r/MensRights27/11/12 01:03 AM
1

"The men's rights subreddit doesn't use stereotypes to trash women! That's just rumors started by people who don't like us! Just go there and try it out; you will see how we are just interested in equal rights for men!"
/r/MensRights27/11/12 12:59 AM
6

I can't tell. Is this attempting to show sexism against women or sexism against men?
/r/MensRights27/11/12 12:51 AM
1

It was silly to take down a fairly mundane "for fun" survey just over some complaints and PC. On the other hand, it wasn't anything against men. They had it up for both males and females. And, when they took it down, they took down both the male and female version. I'm not sure what the point here is?
/r/MensRights27/11/12 12:40 AM
2

I didn't feel my time was wasted. It just seems like sometimes people think that we haven't had threads like this before. On the other hand, you are correct that some portions of the population in both places like to bash the movement for the other gender, and that is unfortunate.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 12:26 AM
1

[citation needed] Which prominent feminist is issuing death threats and inciting violence? I highly doubt this person is considered mainstream within the movement.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 12:21 AM
5

No offense, but though I wish you well, stuff like this gets posted on here every other day. It is not exactly shocking to be a feminist in support of men's rights considering both movements have gender equality as their main goal. Nor are men's rights supporters being in favor of women's rights unique snowflakes either.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 12:13 AM
2

Hi. I give you permission to go post somewhere else now.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 09:49 PM
4

Okay? Which has to do with men's rights how?
/r/MensRights26/11/12 05:57 PM
3

You mean the Femme Fatale? I'm not sure what you are watching, but she hasn't exactly been a rare occurrence in movies and media either.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 02:41 PM
-6

While this is true in theory, your point would be much easier to make if "feminism" wasn't chain-bashed on here every 2 seconds. But, clearly, all someone has to do to be an example of a "feminist" is claim that they are one and then say something ridiculous. Meanwhile, we are somehow not to judge all /r/mensrights by the bad comments of a few misogynists promoting wife-beating. This subreddit really needs to pick one: Either both movements should be classified by their worst elements, or both s…
/r/MensRights26/11/12 02:17 PM
6

I can't click the link, but from what you quoted, I fail to see what women enjoying sex has to do with Men's Rights?
/r/MensRights26/11/12 04:55 AM
1

This is why no one takes this forum seriously. Stop seeing sexism everywhere. Sometimes a statement is just a statement.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 04:47 AM
29

A woman gets a lighter sentence than a man might have....by being forced to cook. This is one of those interesting cases in which someone managed to be sexist in both directions. Quite a feat.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 05:44 PM
2

This may make sense as a general statement, but I'm not sure why you put it in response to my post. There are no feminist "leaders" who would consider crimes good. There might be some very extreme individuals who would do such a thing, but those would be outliers. Should we all leave Men's Rights because some people on this forum have promoted racism?
/r/MensRights23/11/12 03:40 PM
9

This subreddit is just what it says in the name, Men's Rights. Think of it like a feminist movement except with a focus on men instead of women. We discuss issues here like the the way the military industrial complex takes advantage of men, the lack of ability for men to get custody of their children from a divorce, and the characterization of lower class men as criminals by the media.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 10:11 PM
3

The only way to stop it is to take down the entire military industrial complex.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 10:03 PM
0

/r/lgbt
/r/MensRights22/11/12 09:56 PM
13

Careful, alcohol and drugs don't usually mix well. In any case, you have had enough. Tell your friend to drive you home now.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 05:09 PM
-10

Okay, now this is just getting silly. There is a difference between gender equality and gender neutrality. A man is not just a woman with a pole and a woman is not just a man with a hole. There are real, scientifically proven differences between men and women. This does not mean one is superior to the other or that the genders should necessarily be treated differently for most situations, but these differences should be acknowledged to exist, at the very least. Typically, men are more aggressive…
/r/MensRights22/11/12 05:02 PM
8

[citation needed] Oh and just to be clear, "this one girl said this to me one time" does not count as the majority of feminists supporting false rape charges. I just have a feeling you might be having trouble in that area.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 01:56 PM
11

You are really going to pull the "You support x, so what you say on this other topic isn't relevant" card? Also, to your question, "all" is a strong word, because I'm sure someone is going to find that one case that happened that one time 14 years ago in Exceptiontown, Iowa and nitpick at it. However, yes, I would say that the victim's actions are given far to much focus in current-day rape trials.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 12:34 AM
8

If someone is doing something to someone else's body and they are aware that the person does not wish them to continue doing it, then continuing to do so is a crime. Whether or not the other person "started it" is irrelevant. If a drunk individual walks into a tattoo parlor and decides part-way through that he wants the person to stop needling him, the person is required by law to stop. If a healthcare worker is drawing blood from a rational, aware person, and that person asks them to stop, the …
/r/MensRights22/11/12 12:09 AM
20

If the man doesnt react fast enough this is now considered rape according to feminists. If the man "doesn't react fast enough" it is considered rape by a whole lot more than just feminists. If someone decides they don't want you doing something to their body and they ask you to stop, you should stop. This applies regardless of if it is a sex act or not; though if it is a sex act that makes it rape rather than assault/battery.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 11:11 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter