~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | It is worth sacrificing a marriage for a paternity test.There's some old us president who apparently said his approach to international diplomacy was "I trust implicity, after I verify". With important things, that's the smart move. Just make the test standard procedure at the hospital, then no one has to get their feelings hurt, and both men & women will know no one can expect to get away with pulling that bs, and the rates should drop like a rock. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/08/24 07:39 AM |
| 6 | It is worth sacrificing a marriage for a paternity test.In that case, the dna is better than a lie detector, because lie detectors are bs science. Once you've proven it's his, case closed 🤷♂️ | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/08/24 07:36 AM |
| 1 | It is worth sacrificing a marriage for a paternity test.I a perfect world yes. Does everyone have that conversation with a one night stand, or fling? No. Even if it was discussed, would people be stuck to what they agreed at the time? Not from what I understand of any legal structure currently on the planet for paternity testing, though, there might be a few exceptions. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/08/24 07:33 AM |
| 1 | It is worth sacrificing a marriage for a paternity test.Yeah, by that comparison, you certainly wouldn't buy a new car without enough certainty to know the manufacturer & features, and if anything is wrong with it, you can sue the manufacturer. What % above and beyond money spent, for pain & suffering, emotional turmoil, loss of friendships (can sue for those in car accidents), and punitive damage should the parental victim of false paternity be given by the perpetrator? And are they arguing basic tests, like are required to be submitted, like DNA, i… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/08/24 07:31 AM |
| 5 | It is worth sacrificing a marriage for a paternity test.I had a professor who did genetic research across generations. He found about 10% of the dads that agreed to do the research (ie. Probably didn't suspect they weren't the dad, or they would have said no because they decided long ago to not know and just accept it as theirs, alternatively, they could have known they weren't the dad, and then they'd know they were waisting expensive testing & research time, so they wouldn't bother. And before you say it, it was stated that they wouldn't be told if… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/08/24 07:22 AM |
| 3 | It is worth sacrificing a marriage for a paternity test.My thoughts exactly! With fancier equipment, you can also print out gene sequences. They've done it to create bacteria. You want them to have it THAT easy for cops to place DNA at crime scenes if they want to? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/08/24 07:15 AM |
| 1 | It is worth sacrificing a marriage for a paternity test.Yeah, like certain potential future government leaders and their besties. Think you're all 1 ethnicity and you're safe? Think of all this false paternity stuff, and there were a few decades where they messed up and switched babies in hospitals A LOT. Even if you think you're race they won't come after, doesn't mean you aren't a little bit, and that's before someone Eugenics mad person decides they don't like a few of your other genes, and you get a knock on your door. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/08/24 07:13 AM |
| 2 | It is worth sacrificing a marriage for a paternity test.Always dna test your kids, everytime. Normalize it, get rid of any stigma like they do with mental health, disability, and the gender/orientation stuff. The only reason NOT to do it in this day & age is to shelter cheating women who prey on kind men. Note all the nightmare men that don't get chased for child support, because the women just want them gone. Short of a DNA test, there's certain dominant genetic traits, like cleft chin, earlobes attaching, were if the kid has one version, one of the… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/08/24 07:07 AM |
| 1 | Do you think you would exist if your parents had to endure modern dating?People (on average) aren't looking to settle down as early. You can look at historical changes in age at first marriage. And see how it's pushed back, that alone changes the dating dynamic, more time to experiment and see what's out there before locking in "for life", the way my parents got together 😂, it's atypical enough, and they were in close proximity long enough before dating, if the other "key point" was in play on how they met, yeah, it'd probably have gone the same way 🤷♂️ | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/10/23 06:29 AM |
| 0 | Being monogamous and wanting children should guarantee every man getting a female partner. Our current dating environment is just an anomaly before population collapse.Look at animal models, chimps, gorillas, lots of species have 1 male doing most/all of the mating, across various species. Look at elephant seals. The big guys "claim" a big hunk of territory o the beach, and fight off any other males that try to use it. The females want some shore to chill on, and raise their young, so they wind up there, and there's only 1 male who won't, literally and figuratively be crushed to death if they try to mate with the women there (Which leads to different mating st… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/10/23 06:25 AM |
| 2 | Anecdotes are superior to studies in providing sufficient information for forming conclusions regarding entering and maintaining a relationship.That's why, sadly, particularly in certain fields, you need to be REALLY good at understanding what was done, how, and what that really means, and how good the statistical evidence is, and ideally be able to tell the effect size......to bad some fields are pretty poor at self regulating. At least some fields have certain journals that are known to only take quality. There's places you can pay 5k to publish almost any bs study though sigh, but, it IS an attempt to prevent paywalls between society… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/10/23 06:10 AM |
| 4 | Anecdotes are superior to studies in providing sufficient information for forming conclusions regarding entering and maintaining a relationship.Lol, you missed "the file drawer problem", where studies that don't find what they went looking for, or found something contrary to conventional wisdom don't get published (helped lead to the repeatability crisis in psych, because once 1 study, that found something because of poor design, or a fluke of stats, and often small numbers, was hard to disprove, because later studies with different results were assumed to "make errors". Then there's "qualitative research methods", where some refuse to … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/10/23 06:06 AM |
| 2 | Anecdotes are superior to studies in providing sufficient information for forming conclusions regarding entering and maintaining a relationship.PPD? I don't know that term. It's usually 1st year psych students, who aren't necessarily taking it seriously, so they aren't burnt out (yet), but yeah, there's also a lot psych studies well under 30 people total, often enough not even, or barely 30 between the 2 or more groups being compared 😂. But, anecdotes, and "qualitative research methods" are a good way to initially look into a subject, to figure out what questions you should even be asking. Then you run proper experiments. If you're basi… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/10/23 05:35 AM |
| 2 | Being monogamous and wanting children should guarantee every man getting a female partner. Our current dating environment is just an anomaly before population collapse.No idea who you're talking about, but I've known women who talked about their friends doing it. Again, I'd be interested in a study that somehow got unbiased, and actually correct data on the subject, but it would be EXCEEDINGLY difficult, because of the sensitivity of the subject, and the incentives to keep it a secret if they were getting away with it so far 🤷♂️ | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/10/23 05:16 AM |
| 5 | Being monogamous and wanting children should guarantee every man getting a female partner. Our current dating environment is just an anomaly before population collapse.I mean, another route is to get pregnant to trap a man in a relationship, or get child support. I've seen some reddit threads elsewhere talking about areas where women want the guy gone, because they'll get waaay more money from the government as a single mom, than the guy can get in their empoverished neighborhood. The main point, is they have the option of planning to be a single mom, sperm bank or otherwise. Any idea how easy it is to plan to be a single father? Particularly in countries wher… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/10/23 05:09 AM |
| 2 | Being monogamous and wanting children should guarantee every man getting a female partner. Our current dating environment is just an anomaly before population collapse.Yes, there were long stretches of peace times, and many deaths from "duals" over honor and women, probably more so when there weren't more women then men. There's been different forces throughout history on gendered dynamics, but the extreme times leave a BIG mark, that doesn't go away for waaay more generations than we've had established peace. If 3 of 4 men of prime reproductive age die during during an evenly matched 10 year war, what is the result genetically, an even socially that sticks in… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/10/23 05:02 AM |
| 0 | Being monogamous and wanting children should guarantee every man getting a female partner. Our current dating environment is just an anomaly before population collapse.That link doesn't seem to have much to do with your post, it's basically "both genders lost social skills, and are hesitant to talk as much with strangers as they used to", and "some women start planning to intertwine you in their family, fast tracked to marriage and kids on the first date". Definitely had a few, 1st or 2nd gen Canadian women do that very blatently on a first date, and many others more subtlety navigate around general possibilities and interests in related topics to feel out tha… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/10/23 04:59 AM |
| 0 | Being monogamous and wanting children should guarantee every man getting a female partner. Our current dating environment is just an anomaly before population collapse.In this context, I think that term is about ending their genetic lineage. Which is an extreme way of saying they're an end branch in the tree of life/human evolution. Basically all their genes, barring some mutations are likely elsewhere in the population, just not remotely as collected as they would be in a child. Just, an extreme way to say a point that not everyone even cares about 🤷♂️ | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/10/23 04:50 AM |
| 1 | Being monogamous and wanting children should guarantee every man getting a female partner. Our current dating environment is just an anomaly before population collapse.Yeah, look at the ratios in the average relationships, past the slight variation that can be skewed by "certain factors" to a max of about 1:2, in extreme cases, based on what I learned at university. Lot of guys leave, or are kicked out or something. The woman I talked to in that community seemed to just kind of push off the topic, but said it resolved itself with men leaving the community, leaving the exact details vauge | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/10/23 04:35 AM |
| 2 | Being monogamous and wanting children should guarantee every man getting a female partner. Our current dating environment is just an anomaly before population collapse.Yeah "pre-selection" or just yhe subconscious assumtion that they were "vetted" already by other women. That particular study doesn't talk about them going after men in relationships, or married. I'd actually be pretty interested in the results, I wrote a few essays on similar enough topics in school... | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/10/23 04:30 AM |
| 1 | Being monogamous and wanting children should guarantee every man getting a female partner. Our current dating environment is just an anomaly before population collapse.People get stuck in cycles of emotional partner violence of both genders, just one is advertised & studied more, People will argue %, I don't want to get into that. Some people will cheat just because they feel like it, but if you believe evolutionary self replication maximization strategies, the gender both benefit from a monogamous partner in somewhat different ways, and cheat for very different reasons. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/10/23 04:27 AM |
| 1 | Being monogamous and wanting children should guarantee every man getting a female partner. Our current dating environment is just an anomaly before population collapse.It's known well enough that it happens, and they'll be trying to hide it. The percentages of those doing it openly would be the useful data. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/10/23 04:21 AM |
| 1 | Being monogamous and wanting children should guarantee every man getting a female partner. Our current dating environment is just an anomaly before population collapse.There's no such thing as "peace for too long", that should be a goal!!!! But yes, if people aren't willing to defend their country, anyone can walk in and subjugate them. The "opponent" has to know it won't be worth it for them to even try to invade, or they'll likely try, or leverage threatening to try to force you into horrible deals.....Not every country has the power to make it "not worth it" to every would be invader though | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/10/23 04:19 AM |
| 1 | Being monogamous and wanting children should guarantee every man getting a female partner. Our current dating environment is just an anomaly before population collapse.Close enough 😂, throw in he feels anyone wanting to commit is automatically entitled to a partner, because gender ratios are 50/50 (if you average places, actually it's usually a little more female, asside from places that reeeaaalllly don't want daughters, I get into genetic reasons why female survival rates are higher as you age, but that's excessive). The biggest "hole" in the logic, is the assumption that women need to settle for average men, because otherwise there won't be enough men for t… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/10/23 03:48 AM |
| 7 | Being monogamous and wanting children should guarantee every man getting a female partner. Our current dating environment is just an anomaly before population collapse.Lol, no. You have to convince someone you're worth dating, or you get no one. Arranged marriages used to work around that, polygamist cultures allowed the uneven nature of ratios of stereotypical gender preferences to be stabilized in family units. Yes, choosing not to have kids evolutionarily ends their line, but just because they don't want to date you doesn't mean they can go, have a random hookup, get pregnant, and raise it alone, if they really want a kid. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/10/23 03:39 AM |
| 2 | Men are constantly told they overrate themselves, despite the fact that the vast majority of men obviously UNDERrate themselves. Meanwhile, women are notorious for overrating their physical appearance.I mean, I've actually seen the research data. Young men, on average, overestimate their attractiveness (think about it evolutionarily, if guys didn't think they were great, and didn't make a move, the species wouldn't survive as well/at all), and young women tend to underestimate their attractiveness. By young, I mean like 15-22 or so, I don't have the data infront of me, but the trends were pretty clear. HOWEVER as they age, they both tend to, on average rate themselves more and more towards ac… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/10/23 05:27 PM |
| 2 | Why do people choose their spouses based on physical attraction rather than love?Marriages past like 30 years or whatever wind up being more about friendship, than hot steamy feelings, almost all the time!! | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/10/23 06:42 AM |
| 2 | Why do people choose their spouses based on physical attraction rather than love?You just have to not be repullsed by them initially, and decide to give them a chance. I had a professor giving a lecture on marketing, and cars, like people and other things, having a bunch of different traits, and you can't just build your ideal, you pick from what's actually there, that you can Actually get. His big life advice he strongly recommended, was "trade at least SOME looks for other things when you pick your partner, or you'll regret it!!!" | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/10/23 06:41 AM |
| 1 | Why do people choose their spouses based on physical attraction rather than love?There's always the odd person who'll look past any kind of look, it's just less common. There's always some hope! | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/10/23 06:38 AM |
| 1 | Why do people choose their spouses based on physical attraction rather than love?What if you didn't judge them on looks, but they judged you almost solely on looks and what you could do for them, but didn't really catch onto that until it was too late??? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/10/23 06:34 AM |
| 3 | Why do people choose their spouses based on physical attraction rather than love?As a cover for their behavior, to give fake consultation to people that they'll find "the one" as they are, and a way to turn down people while savjng face by saying it's because of something that other's can't prove is false | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/10/23 06:33 AM |
| 1 | Daily Community Chat MegathreadYeah, you're always told when you're young "it'll be awesome later in life!" Then it never is. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/10/23 05:51 AM |
| 1 | Daily Community Chat MegathreadJust don't bring up age (as long as you're SURE they're WELL over any legal age), and if they wind up asking at some point, just answer honestly without hesitation, like it's as important as the color socks you have on, and they're likely to let it slide unless the age difference is HUGE, or they're rrreeaallly against dating more than a year or 2 older. Just ALWAYS be honest if asked!!!! | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/10/23 05:49 AM |
| 1 | Daily Community Chat MegathreadSome guys like a cougar 🤷♂️. And, they probably care less about age than you think they do 🤷♂️ | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/10/23 05:46 AM |
| 3 | Why do people choose their spouses based on physical attraction rather than love?I'd take it as if they aren't good looking enough, you won't even consider them to begin with to find out the other stuff. Also, if you find the other stuff, but you're not just not attracted to them, but repulsed. There's another issue. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/10/23 04:58 AM |
| 3 | Women judge men based on how popular they are with other women which leads to a cycle where a few fuckboys get to pump and dump many womenOnce they're with guys (or girls) who know what they're doing, it's often the case that they can enjoy s3x more than a guy can. Ever hear about the multiple Os? There's a girl in one chat group I'm in, it gets more intense each one she as in a row, as they build on eachother (that parts common), but she goes until she's too dehydrated, or just gets too "out of it". Women enjoy it to, just maybe less in highschool, where their partners don't know what they're doing, and can wind up causing nothin… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/10/23 04:55 AM |
| 5 | Women judge men based on how popular they are with other women which leads to a cycle where a few fuckboys get to pump and dump many womenIt lets them play the victim to people 🤷♂️ | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/10/23 03:50 AM |
| 1 | Women are happier "single" because they're aren't really single at allThe correlations are generally good, but they're correlations, and have plenty of outliers. If she's in Hollywood, the standards are probably pretty consistent, other places, not always as strong. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/10/23 11:43 PM |
| 1 | Women are happier "single" because they're aren't really single at allThose studies find commonalities, but cultural differences alter attractiveness of say weight, how many rings you fit on your neck, how wide your lip piercings are, etc. There are some general universals, but even those have exceptions with some individuals preferring what's ugly to others. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/10/23 11:41 PM |
| 1 | Women are happier "single" because they're aren't really single at allThey tend to win in courts because judges "try to find a way to give custody to the mother", literal quote I've heard from judges. It's based on the outdated assumption that women will almost always parent better, with a subtle hint of "the man isn't REALLY required, so, if he winds up out of the picture, no big loss, especially if he's still paying" | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/10/23 11:37 PM |
| 1 | Women are happier "single" because they're aren't really single at allEvolutionarily true, now we have birthcontrol, including condoms and pills, and abortion that works far better and safer than even 100years ago, which is nothing on an Evolutionary time scale. Behavior just hasn't caught up. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/10/23 11:34 PM |
| 1 | Women are happier "single" because they're aren't really single at allAttractiveness is inherently subjective 🤷♂️ | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/10/23 11:21 PM |
| 1 | Women are happier "single" because they're aren't really single at allSome people (male & female), are perfectly happy single 'forever', but that's not MOST people, and the overwhelming experience of men is: they don't have a real chance at lots of physical contact over a year +. The general experience from women in my experience is an overwhelming amount of chances for physical contact, to the point that many aren't wanted. It's....a complex topic. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/10/23 11:19 PM |
| 1 | Women are happier "single" because they're aren't really single at allIf it's 1 person here and there, it's probably them, if it's like 20+% of the population with the same issue, it's not them. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/10/23 11:14 PM |
| 1 | Women are happier "single" because they're aren't really single at allIt does, but so does a year without it, 5 years without it. A lifetime without it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/10/23 11:02 PM |
| 1 | Women are happier "single" because they're aren't really single at allIt does, but so does 2 years, or 5 years, or a life time. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/10/23 11:01 PM |
| 1 | Women are happier "single" because they're aren't really single at allFew men have 16 partners their entire life. No matter what they try. Yes, it sucks some people lie to you, but imagine if no one EVER wanted you in the first placed and you could get laughed at for having the audacity to approach someone of the opposite sex, or ostracized in social settings if you tried, but weren't "good enough" with reading social ques, or phrasing things right? Not all guys, especially the ones that are "always single" pick up on everything. If they don't notice someone's int… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/10/23 10:59 PM |
| 1 | Women are happier "single" because they're aren't really single at allI hope you share this conversation thread with your significant other, I'd be curious to hear their reaction | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/10/23 10:23 PM |
| 1 | It’s time to open to door to discussing the TRUTH behind SA and who is classified as a victimLiterally have talked about these issues with reporting from sociologist in other areas, and people on the other side of this issue...until you can get real data, yeah, it's hard to know. All we really know, is it's way worse than we've been historically told, and we need people properly collecting this data. And being very specific about the meaning of the terms to the people answering, because many terms can fit on a different scale in different people's minds....then when it's reported, it ne… | /r/MensRights | 09/10/22 07:05 AM |
| 1 | It’s time to open to door to discussing the TRUTH behind SA and who is classified as a victimTop 20%???? More like 5%.....I saw a video working with Tinder data suggesting closer to 0.45-.9%, lol. 20%? Really? | /r/MensRights | 09/10/22 06:54 AM |
| 1 | It’s time to open to door to discussing the TRUTH behind SA and who is classified as a victimI always appreciate sources, but the other side rarely sources, and when they do, it's often cherry picked, conpletly misrepresented, severely out of date, and ignoring the male vicitim side of things. I'm not saying 2 wrongs make a right, but the bar should be the same for all. Also, why does her saying men should have freedom, and not be subjugated, mean she can't be free to, enjoy her own freedom, particularly if it's not something she feels ashamed about and is trying to hide? I never heard … | /r/MensRights | 09/10/22 06:45 AM |
| 1 | UK: Online marketer, 32, BANS men as clients after being bombarded by creepy messages as she tried to build her business OP: It happens to men as well. She is just making an issue out of it.Not all businesses only have 1 gender. Even 45% loss of potential indivuduals, is missrepresenting the true client loss. Companies with strictly female & married male employees, are going to account for less than 55% of companies. And are you going to tell your client company, they have to gender discriminate who they hire for your point of contact, or hire for their company in general, as a term of their contract, or do run on short contracts and drop them? If work is plentiful enough in the in… | /r/MensRights | 11/05/22 12:24 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter