TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Top-Local-7482 Archive

View 0 posts and 57 comments by Top-Local-7482 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Depend if it is a partner for sex or to live together, for sex you just do with another consenting human. It is like the grocery store, you've choose based on the picture and the description, on any mobile app....
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 08:02 AM
–

You don't have to be attracted to your partner to have sex with them, a hole is a hole when the important thing OP is looking for is sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/24 03:53 PM
–

Hey op if the sexdrive of your partner is not good enough for you, get another one. Also samesex is way more rewarding and pleasurable imho. Just hop on Grindr and get sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/24 12:27 PM
40

"You are becoming the man in the man vs bear story" aren't men already that men in the eye of "all" woman ? So why bother ?
/r/MensRights17/07/24 06:39 PM
2

Yep you definitively don't know what asexual mean, but hey be you, try to get lucky with a partner and figure out yourself, this may help you. The split attraction model may help you see trough your feeling : Sexual attraction -> I wanna have sex with them Sensual attraction -> I wanna sense them (I wanna cuddle / touch them) Romantic attraction -> I wanna date them (I've a crush) Platonic attraction -> I wanna best friend them Aesthetic attraction -> I wanna stare / listen at them (They are bea…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 10:08 PM
2

it is natural it is just not cisheteronormative, lot of people on the autism spectrum don't experience all kind of attractions. 1 person out of a 100 is on the autism spectrum now and number are growing rapidly, my guess is that autism is the next evolution of the human race. We'll see what future bring, neurodiversity may be the next norm.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 04:07 PM
2

Lol yeah sure... I don't do penetrative sex, I'm not looking for sex or intimacy. If it happen I'll just enjoy the moment passively, on the receiving hand or by making my partner enjoy their body.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 04:04 PM
1

Well I'm aroace, I stil enjoy the company of my friend and I enjoy a good restaurant or a good night out with them. Why would I go on a date ? To spend some good time with someone else, restaurant alone is not as fun nor interesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 04:03 PM
2

Nah, I'm aroace and I'm invited on date, it is not like I don't want to pay I'd be happy to share the bill but they'll not let me. Seems like some woman just like to spend their time with me and I enjoy their company. I certainly don't want to get laid and I don't really seek 24/7 relationship nor more dates, I'm pretty busy usually.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 03:50 PM
2

I'm aroace and I got invited a few time by my friends and she wouldn't let me pay, she insist on paying for everything. So I usually don't pay, but I still offer her present for big occasion and try to arrange vacation trip but she knows my bank account and she would usually send her part on it. I would rather go Dutch to balance things out.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 03:17 PM
1

Woman are doing makeup cause patriarcat, men will tell them that they look bad without it all day long, then people like you will tell them they do makeup cause they are insecure... You say makeup don't make them more attractive but it does for them and for men too. People you see all day long on tv, movies, ads all have makeup. As a men try putting some eyeliner and foundation then see how much more woman get to talk to you... Even the natural look you seem to talk about here is done with makeu…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 09:12 AM
1

If men have to pay for divorce and or alimony it is because they don't have the children the same amount of time as the other parent. If they raise children equally after divorce then there should not be any alimony at least in my country. If that is an issue for you then, raise your standard and find a high value woman that can provide for you. Then after divorce you'll be the one getting alimony.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/24 12:04 PM
0

I get what you mean but that is not misandry, "traditionally" in our society men bring money, women keep the house. When someone talk about "traditional" family that is what they mean. You can't dismiss the facts, now that both parent are working men also need to participate in raising children and household task, else they are doing less in the household. Just providing is not enough since men are not the only provider in the household anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/24 12:00 PM
1

Yep totally agree, OP exposing is case is avoiding all real concerns. Their best case scenario is not that prevalent. And there are lot of situation out there where being single parent household would be better. Or even multi generational household, they are excluding lot of possible scenario with their assumption.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/24 11:55 AM
1

The situation is greyer than what you expose. I agree that this is usually the case but you'll also find lot of women online talking about "their" childrens even when their father is arround them, not "our" childrens. I've seen so many comment of woman saying "my" childrens and their father doing "nothing" in raising them. Well yeah, since they are "my" children I decide for everything and don't let their father engage with them or raise them. Stop calling them your childs and start calling them…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/24 11:52 AM
5

No, I don't, there are other place in the world where household are comprise of multiple generation and that is also very valid and good for the children's life.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/24 11:40 AM
1

Love to children is more important than anything else, if the couple is not working it is not good a good environment for the children either. Two parents households is not the best for kids, that is a western view on things. There are households that comprise multiple generation in other part of the world, there are also village where all kid are village's kids. Those are as good option as any of the other. Single parent household is also great if the parent love their children and have time fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/24 11:39 AM
1

Thanks for the explaination, that make sens.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 12:48 PM
2

Oh gotcha I didn't knew about the difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 12:46 PM
0

Ok then MGTOW is different from 4B where they say no sex at all. Why do you say it is re pillers without woman ?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 10:22 AM
-1

Isn't celibacy the whole point of MGTOW ? No interraction with woman, no relationship, only sex maibe ? More of a voluntary celibacy ? I don't understand the smiley ? Anybody can get a woman for sex it is as easy as having 50€ in your pocket.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/24 09:17 PM
16

The only difference is that they also don't want to have sex with men, while MGTOW just don't want to be involved in a relationship, they are still seeking for sex, no ?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/24 07:10 PM
2

Whatever they want, if that works for them, then just be it. Not everyone is a good fit for anyone else, there will still be people dating other people undisturbed by all theses movements. Thoses who don't want to date will just stay single and that's also good.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/24 07:03 PM
4

"OP also is lying about not knowing pretty quick about her feelings on a guy." -> No, no you can't deduct that, OP is obviously on one of the attraction spectrum, it is how they experience the world and interraction with other people. It is valid, they just don't know it yet so they though it was like that for everyone. There are a part of the population that don't feel sexual or romantic attraction dirrectly for someone else, they need to know them before it develop and that is valid. Where the…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 10:33 AM
1

"Who sees woman as a sexual object Is this part not correct? I feel like this has pretty much been validated by 99% of the replies" -> Not necessarily as sexual object, but as potential partner ! With sexual and romantical attraction to you. Men seeing you as sexual object are usually doing the "meet, sex, drop rinse and repeat" behavior. In that case they use you for sex, they may see you as sexual object or even not if they find out you have thing to share with you, then you may become partner…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 10:27 AM
1

Reading from their comment, I think they will think something like "maibe later when I know you", OP seem to be on one of the attraction spectrum as a demi. OP how would you react ?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 10:17 AM
3

Hey it is a you issue but not only and it is valid. This may help you find out who you are, why you see things like you see them and why it is not necessarily how other people see it. Here is the split attraction model, attraction is a spectrum, from demi to never: Sexual attraction -> I wanna have sex with them Sensual attraction -> I wanna sense them (I wanna cuddle / touch them) Romantic attraction -> I wanna date them (I've a crush) Platonic attraction -> I wanna best friend them Aesthetic a…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 10:14 AM
6

"Some guys have the "sneaky fuck" strategy where they intentionally put themselves in the friendzone and wait for her weak point" Yeah that is why OP can't be ambigous and that is why also there are hardly true friendship between potential partner/target. It boil down to this, either they are not a potential partner/target and you can be real friend or they are and you can't.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 09:58 AM
5

Yes, you'll be seen as a good guys and we all know what that mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 09:53 AM
3

But then you are friends with benefits, not just friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 09:49 AM
6

Yep you are right, OP is on the asexual/aromantic spectrum and they don't even know about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 09:47 AM
2

Yes so to the point of OP, there is always more than a platonic friendship between potential partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 09:46 AM
16

Why sad ? You have only so much time, spend it with the people you like be it men or woman, it would usually be men cause same center of interrest and less heat. I do have woman friend and I do go to eat with them, even spend vacation with them, but I'm queer. My friend don't really understand that, if they go out with a woman is because they are their partner, friend of their partner, colleague or there is a romantical/sexual attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 09:40 AM
2

Basically, no, friendship btw potential partner is rarrely possible. By default you'll be seen as a potential partner. You'll only be seen as friend if you are engaged with another friend or if you are not a target. You can't be ambigous with a man, either you are interrested in them or you are not, if the door stay open, you can't complain if they take their chances. You certainly can't be ambiguous if they are engaged, their partner will hunt you down. "For me personally, my first concern when…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 09:38 AM
1

Yep we like to have you arround, you shine, you are funny, interresting and generous but as a friend... To be honest, It is not that bad, I've fun with my friends and they are also generous to me, the only lacking part is romance but again I'm not really sure it is something I want or not, I prefer to be alone most of my time.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 03:12 PM
-1

They just feel safe arround gay man cause there are no sexual tension between them. And they don't compete for the same meat like with other woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 07:30 PM
2

I don't understand why this is so conflicting, women have been doing it for years. I've a few friends who conceived their children without father and they are pretty happy about it. Plus it is more moral that way as they didn't lead on men to have what they wanted. I don't know why this is an issue when it is a man that want their own no string attached children.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 01:47 PM
14

I got downvoted to hell in another conversation where a lot of woman wanted to have woman only train carriage here too. I guess lot of them really want gendered train carriage and don't understand the issues that goes with it. Here the Guardians is exposing the same thing but use it to express there are still big difference between gender. I mean, ok they are right but that is what lot of woman want !
/r/MensRights09/03/24 02:08 AM
1

Nah you'll not be called "gay" for catcalling her, but you'll definitively give women the "ick"... Same if you go out with you MAGA equipment in NYC and approach a women in a bar...
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 04:42 PM
1

Yes and no, if their best friend is gay or aromantic/asexual where is the issue ?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 02:38 PM
2

Yeah that is a USA thing, here you'll get the time off whatever. And you would also have access to free nurse service to take care of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 09:55 PM
1

If you separate you'll still have benefits/aliemony, married or not, at least in my country.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 09:49 PM
1

Guenuine question what hazards ? it might be different in the USA than here. Here you'll get child support from him in case of separation and he could end up not seeing his children at all, if it is 50/50 for the children no one gets nothingn, marriage or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 09:46 PM
0

You could end up with one salary to care for the baby, that is what you mean ? IDK how it work in USA but here, if the father is recognised (necessary on the birth certificate) you could get entitled to child support from him anyways, mariage or not. He also could end up not seing his baby at all in case of separation, mariage or not. There are also some woman who just want the children and not the man (this is totally valid imho) but then both partner need to be cool with it. A friend of mine d…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 09:41 PM
0

lol yeah, well I don't know the real stat but I see lot of marriage arround me ending like this, even from couple you wouldn't think it happen to them. Without a marriage you can use the ceremony money better elsewhere, for advancing your couple in life for example. Not being married, having children and staying together for a long time is the best testament to love one can get. Since there are no bounding pact trust is paramont in the relation, people who can do it are on very strong ground for…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 09:21 PM
0

At least someone got it, I wouldn't say stupid, it is technically the truth a logical answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 09:00 PM
-1

What kind ? It is as easy to divorse as it is to marry.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 08:34 PM
0

Not in my experience, kids give the best chances of staying together.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 08:31 PM
-2

Better chance of ending in a divorse, for sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 08:27 PM
-2

I've plenty of other example of married couple that divoced pretty early.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 08:26 PM
-1

A close friend of mine always refused marriage he is with his girlfriend for 20y now and they have 3kids together. Another friends of mine divorsed after 7y with 2 kids. Marriage don't mean anything anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 08:21 PM
1

I guess that is the difference btw being attractive and being normal. Men not wanting to date befriending a woman, she'll expect you to ask them out. Normal men not wanting to date befriending a woman she'll epect you not to ask them out. I'm also a single men not wanting to date anyone with 6fig and I just tell them I'm gay and I don't get any hostility from them, just friendship usually.
/r/MensRights11/12/23 11:01 AM
3

Nah they just tried their best to conform to society and other, convincing themselves they were hetero, till it was not possible anymore. Regarding the child you oppress here, you know shit about him and what he is currently facing, you are homophobic and judgemental, put yourself in his shoe and see for yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 05:04 PM
2

"Just how did this modern phenomena arise, and why is incidence becoming more common?" It is not new, it exists since the dawn of time, it is just that it is less risky now to embrace who you really are in western society than it was 20y ago. Late bloomer were gay since the beggining, they just tried to conform to the society, being good subject for a part of their life, convincing themselves they were hetero until it was not possible anymore. It is called internalised homophobia and it is the s…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 04:45 PM
1

Hey OP this sound Aromantic to me, joining r/aromantic may give you other answers. Also just in case: here are the 5 main kind of attractions, you may have all of them or not: - Sexual attraction -> I wanna have sex with them - Sensual attraction -> I wanna sense them (I wanna cuddle / touch them) - Romantic attraction -> I wanna date them (I've a crush) - Aesthetic attraction -> I wanna stare / listen at them (They are beautiful) - Platonic attraction -> I wanna best friend them I wouldn't be a…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 04:33 PM
1

OP don't judge you don't know what is the reality of other. I'm an introvert AroAce I'm not looking to bond with other people romantically.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 04:25 PM
2

Taking the same elevator as them instead of waiting for the next one "creep" There is a fine line here, to navigate arround. At work, if you don't take the same elevator as woman in your team, they may say that they don't feel part of the team and or that they are not treated the same as other member of the team. While same people would think other gender people are a creep for taking the same elevator as them. It is not yet well defined what is a socially acceptable interraction between gender …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/23 11:05 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter