~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | What data is out there to debunk the "misandry annoys, misogyny kills" argument?Oh, don’t worry, I’m well aware that some MRAs happen to support abortion, usually when it’s about avoiding child support rather than defending women’s reproductive rights. That’s not exactly the same fight. And no, I never said all MRAs are anti-choice. What I pointed out (and what still stands) is that reproductive rights have been consistently restricted by male-dominated institutions, with or without the individual opinions of some MRAs. If anything, the MRA movement has historically focused… | /r/MensRights | 28/03/25 02:55 PM |
| 1 | What data is out there to debunk the "misandry annoys, misogyny kills" argument?I get your point, but I think you’re missing the bigger picture. Sure, it’s true that support for abortion is split between men and women, but historically, and still today, most of the push to restrict reproductive rights (like birth control and abortion) has come from men in positions of power. The fact is that many of these decisions were made by men in government or religious leadership, and women had to fight just to gain access to these services. It’s not about narcissism. It’s about the r… | /r/MensRights | 26/03/25 12:54 PM |
| 0 | What data is out there to debunk the "misandry annoys, misogyny kills" argument?Ahahahah go to sleep grandpa, that’s already too much for you lol 🤭🤭 | /r/MensRights | 26/03/25 11:01 AM |
| -1 | What data is out there to debunk the "misandry annoys, misogyny kills" argument?“Biology isn’t oppression”? Okay, then explain why women’s biology has been used as an excuse to strip them of their rights for centuries. Why did women have to fight just to access birth control, abortion, or even the right to work without a man’s permission? And sure, some MRAs might be pro-choice (which is debatable), but that doesn’t change the fact that women’s reproductive rights are constantly under attack(mostly by men). So yeah, the “birth argument” is 100% valid. Nice try, though. | /r/MensRights | 26/03/25 09:58 AM |
| -1 | What data is out there to debunk the "misandry annoys, misogyny kills" argument?What supremacy? Fighting for women’s rights is supremacy? Fighting for our protection against men is supremacy? Fighting to be paid the same as men is supremacy? Fighting to have access to the same jobs as men is supremacy? And let me tell you something: you’re talking about female supremacy, but it doesn’t make sense. Men have always claimed to be superior to women and have humiliated them for centuries. So saying “female supremacy” is like saying “racism against white people exists”, it just d… | /r/MensRights | 26/03/25 09:51 AM |
| -3 | What data is out there to debunk the "misandry annoys, misogyny kills" argument?Find me a statistic that proves that it is the women FROM THE BEGINNING who have never wanted to do their jobs, and after that we can debate | /r/MensRights | 26/03/25 08:00 AM |
| -3 | What data is out there to debunk the "misandry annoys, misogyny kills" argument?You say nonsense because that are the MEN who said that women can’t go in frontline nor work in construction. But today we’re in 2025 things are moving there’s more and more women that go in army or work in construction. So I don’t know when your statistics are dated but you should think about updating them | /r/MensRights | 26/03/25 07:51 AM |
| 0 | What data is out there to debunk the "misandry annoys, misogyny kills" argument?Killing people is not a privilege | /r/MensRights | 26/03/25 07:27 AM |
| -8 | What data is out there to debunk the "misandry annoys, misogyny kills" argument?What oppression?? Feminists are just fighting for equity. The day men can give birth, you can come back to talk to me about real oppression. | /r/MensRights | 26/03/25 07:25 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter