TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TopExpert5455 Archive

View 0 posts and 126 comments by TopExpert5455 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

You can abolish the draft but as soon as shit hits the fan it will be re-instated. An obvious example is when a neighbouring country invades yours (see Ukraine). What are you going to do then? Just surrender and hope for the best? Either you draft men to defend your country or your country is gone. Depending who invades and with what intention the last option could be catastrophic for the population. My point is, abolishing the draft is simply fantasy. Even if some politicians make this a law it…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 07:58 PM
0

You are right of course that one should not expect that. However, it is also feminists themselves who gaslight men into believing this. Because they say: feminism is only about gender equality. How can you be against that? If you are not a feminist you must be against gender equality. Therefore, everyone should be a feminist. This line of reasoning in one form or another I have read many, many times coming from feminists. It implies that feminism is impartial and only wants "gender equality". Of…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 04:58 PM
1

Because of the gaslighting. Maybe if you read it from a different POV you will understand. It goes like this Please join our movement! It is called masculinism. Our credo is Gender equality for all! How can you be against that? Based on this alone you must support us or you are against gender equality and that's terrible and makes you a bigot. One small caveat though. In reality we exclusively focus on male issues and ignore any female issues completely, pretending they don't exist or blame the …
/r/MensRights17/12/24 05:28 PM
1

I guess so. My experience from Western Europe where I live btw. I sort of gave up two years ago after a year of trying on the Apps. It was lot's of effort and only negative experiences to be honest. Not sure if the Apps can ever be a good solution but as they are now, they are completely broken and not suited for people actually looking for a relationship in my opinion. For both sexes I guess but I can only speak for one side of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 04:57 PM
2

I understand your perspective but understand that there is a reason. Since the swipe to match ratio is so low you need to swipe right on more profiles to have even a chance of a match. That is how many guys feel and explains their behavior. From my POV, I don't want to be talking to a woman who is also entertaining 20 other guys at the same time. It is just humiliating. I want to be taken at least somewhat serious otherwise it is just a huge waste of time. You feel that matching with a guy is me…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 04:41 PM
5

What will change is that women will be even more selective, swiping right on even less profiles than before resulting in regular guys having almost 0 chance of a match. Think about it. Why would I, as a guy, use an app where every day I can swipe 5 times for an almost 0 chance of a match? One match every few days (my actual experience) would change to one match every few months. If at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 04:01 PM
8

For regular guys this approach will basically guarantee that they will get 0 matches because the matching percentage for right swipes is like <1% for them, I know from experience. Even more so than now all the matches will go to the hottest guys. Capping the outcome (5 matches max) is easier and more fair. Anyway, this is all hypothetical, there is no way the Apps will implement this because they will lose money.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 03:25 PM
6

I feel that 5 a day is too much even. 5 in total would be better. If you want another match after that you need to unmatch someone first. More filters I agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 02:39 PM
12

I think there are definitely rules you can implement that would improve the situation for those who are interested in a serious relationship. The problem is that those rules are not beneficial (financially) for the companies making the apps. The App makers make their money from people (mostly men) who pay for stuff like: boosting their profile visibility, dumb stuff like super likes, etc... Ideally there should be an App created by a non profit or even government that really tries to maximise th…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 02:22 PM
-1

They are not diseases. I get that this is an appealing idea to those that don't like to be accountable for their own actions but that's just weak. An addict chooses each day to use. A disease is something you don't choose, like ALS for example. With enough willpower and maybe some help from others you can recover from addiction. Big difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 08:25 PM
-1

No, my point is not that it helps the recovery process of those dealing with the issue per se (although it absolutely can in some cases). More so that it helps to prevent people going down that route. It should not be normalized or celebrated.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 08:12 PM
-2

Eating disorders is a psychological issue I never understood. I guess the result is that you become very overweight or underweight? My stance is that instead of accepting that we should encourage those people to seek help and overcome their issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 05:27 PM
1

Some behaviors need to be shamed by society. Also in public. Examples are drug abuse, alcoholism, laziness, eating too much to the point of obesity, sleeping around, etc... This shaming serves a purpose. It warns others to stay away from that. And with good reason because if too many people engage in such behavior it is very bad for society as whole. It can not be encouraged. That's why the "body positivity" movement is deadly. It actually kills people by making them believe there are 0 issues w…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 12:54 PM
1

Interesting comic. Thanks for the link. I guess your environment indeed has a strong influence in how "appealing" these drugs are. If you are isolated and unhappy they might look like a good way to escape that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 05:19 PM
1

You might be right. IDK, the idea of so many people (men or women) taking meds is depressing to me. Even though in some ways our material wealth has never been higher our hapiness is not increasing it seems. Bums me out. Maybe I should visit a therapist myself :)
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 06:02 PM
4

These numbers are still rising FYI. Makes you wonder, how high will they go? 30%? 50%? It is absolutely scary how normalized it has become to take medication for mental health. We are in deep trouble as a society when citizens, on a massive scale, are choosing to drug themselves to keep functioning. What is driving this madness? Is it big pharma pushing drugs for profit or do we truly have a mental health crisis compared to 100 years ago when these drugs were barely used? And why are women more …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 03:24 PM
1

The truth is that women absolutely LOVE to be sexually objectified. Just by the person they want and at the time they want. When that pussy is wet most women can come to a point where they say stuff like "treat me like a sex doll daddy" or similar. That is almost a literal quote FYI. I am not shaming them. Most guys would kill to be sexually objectified. Awesome and validating experience. Of course the same thing applies, you don't want that from women you are not into sexually.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 03:11 PM
1

I removed mine but you downvoted me as well I think? Leave it, I don't care. It's like whatever, useless karma. I remove all my comments after 1 day anyway. No way do I want a permanent record of these silly PPD convos. To return to your question, yes, to me it seems highly unusual to have 10 LTRs, even if over 20 years, for all the reasons I mentioned earlier. Good that it worked out for you. It didn't for his previous 10 girlfriends is my point. I would not risk it with those numbers but then …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 04:22 PM
1

How can you get into a relationship, and after 8 months (up to a few years) break up, 10 times in a row?! You fail to maintain a relationship that many times? It is possible but something is clearly wrong, that is a red flag by itself. Too much failure indicating he doesn't choose well, doesn't know what he wants, lacks commitment or is a bad partner / cheater. Something smells. In this case it would actually be better if some/most of these were casuals because "something" caused those 10 previo…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 02:23 PM
1

Are you sure about "happily"? Of male incels, what percentage is ugly or autistic VS attractive and "neurotypical"? What is the effort to find a partner for an unattractive person vs an an attractive person? Is there a difference in opportunity? Don't fall into the just world fallacy. It is an unmaintainable position.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/22 05:13 PM
1

He is simply making the observation, which is true, that women will pick an asshole over a nice guy. This nice guy doesn't even have to be a pushover or wimp. It is just that the asshole exhibits traits that are attractive to her. Like forwardness, assertiveness, dominance, being unapologetic and critically: no problem escalating the relationship and pushing for sex. Only problem is that... well, he's an asshole and ends up treating her horribly. The only take away is that the advice of: "just t…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/22 05:00 PM
1

It could be that they are doing nothing wrong. The guy (or gal) could simply be ugly or maybe autistic, both of which are largely genetically determined. An attractive person never has to do this "hard looking at themselves" because they do not have these problems (for the most part). This world is not fair or just. We are not all born with equal "equipment" or opportunity. That is the harsh reality. Black pill. It has some truth, but like all "pills" it is not the complete story.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/22 04:47 PM
1

Where did I say that? Fuck whoever you fancy. I just observe the fact that women are held to different (lower) standards than men. We are not playing the same game. That's it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/22 04:34 PM
1

Well good, that's something at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/22 04:01 PM
1

Yes, you are one of the worst. Like objectively. A total PPD junkie claiming to be enlightened ruining this sub with his bad takes. The first step towards healing from addiction is admitting you have a problem. You are not there yet. Please stick to lifting and lurking.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/22 03:52 PM
1

I agree but this is exactly what is done in areas where men naturally dominate. Enforced equality. Two notable examples are gender quotas and forced equal pay for female athletes (who often draw smaller crowds and thus generate less income for their employers). That is not right either.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 05:49 PM
1

Yeah sure but that is what everyone does. On and off. Me too. I don't lift but like running, did 10 miles this morning. "Life stuff". Meeting friends, etc.. All that. My point is, you are on your phone a lot, obviously. You post/comment way more than me. I am often not here for days or weeks, not even lurking, yet I would never claim to be an "enlightened one" who has mastered the art of "turning off their screen". But whatever. It's ok. Have a good one.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 07:45 PM
1

Lol, says the one who literally comments on every post on PPD (many times over). You practically live here dude. You did imply that you are one enlightened ones that "figured out how to turn their screen off" right? Otherwise, my bad. But if so, funniest thing ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 05:51 PM
–

Sure, I agree: IF. However most don't and accumulate emotional baggage, physical baggage (children) and let themselves go physically. A woman in her 20s is physically more attractive in every way compared to a 40 year old. No contest. Would I consider dating a woman in her 20s? No, because I am a bit older and find them to be immature in character, even childlike sometimes (depending on the person). Off putting. My dating pool is 35+ and the number of attractive women in that range, even without…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 07:04 AM
–

You probably came this point in your life after having tasted relationships and sexual experiences right? Otherwise it is almost impossible to voluntarily give up, especially if your libido is high (like most men). I mean it is ok, even admirable perhaps, but this volcel mindset has some preconditions is my point. For a virgin guy in his 20s, his body raging with testosterone, this is virtually impossible. I hope you agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 06:46 AM
1

Sure, but the only way you could afford this "laid back" attitude in dating is because you had lots of matches and opportunity. No way you can have that attitude if you just spend weeks or months labouring to land that date. This is a reality for many guys. Women on OLD tend to ghost and are incredibly flaky. Maybe out of 10/20 matches you can manage 1 date. I am being generous here. Now do the math if you only have a few matches a week. And it will be hard work because the women will generally …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/22 08:27 PM
1

Their problem you say? Let's follow that line of reasoning. Breast cancer? That is a women's issue so fuck 'm. Let them solve it. Rape? Same thing. Wage gap? Likewise. Girls not being given education in some countries? ... You get it. Not my problem. This is ridiculous. Men and women are living alongside each other. Sooner or later the issues of one gender become the issues of the other. If you flat out say: fuck men's issue, that's their problem then you can expect the same in return and you wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/22 10:38 AM
1

You can technically live and survive without any friends or social contact. Conclusion: social contact is not a need. Sure, it is not a need in that you will physically die without it. But to go without most people will be driven to depression. There are many things in life actually that when you are deprived of it you will not die but your mental health will absolutely suffer for it. Same with sex. More so for men since their sex drive is higher. This line of thinking completely ignores the men…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/22 10:22 AM
1

It's true. Women on OLDs have so many options lined up that they will "next" you at the smallest thing. Any woman who is seriously looking for a man and knows what she wants in a partner (while being realistic) should find one easily. The longer they are on there the apps the worse potential partner they likely are.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/22 07:49 PM
34

Not lying, I 100% though this to be fake. A parody. But then I checked twitter and the tweet is actually real. WTF?! Thankfully most replies call out their monumental stupidity but my god... this is next level dumb. And not just dumb but downright hateful. They are literally saying: we don't give a fuck about men. No two ways about it.
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/22 02:13 PM
1

If you had no problem finding a "handsome, confident" man you must have severe pretty privilege or were just very lucky. Otherwise it doesn't add up. That type of man has options and men with options tend to exercise them. At least for a while. The fact is that the average man is not handsome but overweight and not particularly confident either. Emotionally understanding or faithful I'll not comment. My point is that statistically there are simply not many men that fit those criteria and therefo…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/22 05:28 AM
1

Men are highly competitive amongst each other. I would say more so than women but that is another argument. My point is that it is rarely the case that a man is truly looking for a "submissive" partner, however, since their life is full competition already, this is not what most men want in a partner. Instead they want a break from that and have some peace of mind, That means no drama, needless arguments, nagging, etc... Anyway. I think this should not be a gendered thing. A lot of women also wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/22 06:09 PM
1

I agree that we should try and set our petty struggles aside and make this world a better place for the children, they are the future. I say this while having no children myself. Would have liked to have them? Yes, and a partner as well but it does not look like that is going to happen. It pains my heart. I often feel empty, without purpose and find it difficult to find meaning and joy in life. It is hard to be empathetic and compassionate when you feel that way and to be honest I am not. There …
/r/MensRights18/10/22 03:35 PM
1

Thank you for your story. I did read it all. I tend to be pro life like yourself but I am not a hardliner. It must be tough getting an abortion if you feel that way and then not succeeding is just double bad luck. I hope your child comes into this world healthy and they will know your love. May they bring you joy even in these tough times for you. May you become strong and wise through this experience. God bless.
/r/MensRights18/10/22 06:15 AM
1

Of course, it depends on the case, but you can't build a written law for that. But for instance, when a woman lies that she is birth control because she wants a kid but her partner does not, this should absolutely be enough for the guy to walk away from responsibility. Very hard to proof though. I only bring this up because my own sister did this. Haha, unbelievable. In the end she managed to convince him to stick around and take care of the kid but wow, talk about manipulative. I would encourag…
/r/MensRights17/10/22 07:45 PM
2

For real. All we ever hear in mainstream is: woman good, man bad, woman victim, man perpetrator. Ad nauseum. This message is received loud and clear and men are struggling because of it. Only on social media, in a few places like this one, is a different narrative then the feminist one even allowed to be spoken. I wonder for how long though. I would not be surprised if the reddit admins close it down at some point or replace all mods with bluepill ones to combat "misogyny" (any non feminist narr…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/22 06:09 PM
1

That means almost 40% are not. This is a huge percentage, not that far away from an even split. It is a recipe for disaster honestly and increased misogyny is a logical outcome. I don't condone it but it is perfectly explainable. Many men (but not all) who are undesired and unsuccessful with women become resentful towards them over time. It is like physics. Inevitably, on average it is going to happen. This is just a general psychological tendency people have, to come to despise the thing that y…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/22 02:52 PM
1

It's not just about finding, it is about effort. Most young women can get find a mate with almost 0 effort since the burden of pursuing, approaching and "wooing" lies on the man. Like you said, they are born with inherent worth, I agree. Therefore the woman can take a very passive role to the point where a relationship "just happens" for her. This is funny because if you ask the guy in that relationship often the "just happens" part required a lot of work on his part. The passive role is especia…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 07:07 AM
1

Haha, upvote from me because you are right: your BF is an outlier for sure. Most men care. They care even more that their current partner doesn't sleep around while being in a relationship. Most women do too. In fact, the vast majority of people prefer monogamous relationships without involving other sex partners. FYI, there is a term for a man who's wife is unfaithful. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuckold A closely related term is cuckholding. That is used to describe someone (mostly men) wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 05:54 AM
1

So what about an experienced guy who's had little or no sexual experience?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 05:29 PM
1

Your words: I would rather settle with someone who "has experienced life" instead of an "inexperienced guy". Inexperienced in what sense? This is mostly used to refer to sexually inexperienced people in this sub. You are directly comparing that to someone who "has experienced life" in the same sentence. Therefore I though you implied that "experienced life" = "sexually experienced" I mean, maybe your wording is just weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 05:11 PM
1

So in your view someone who didn't sleep around with lots people "hasn't experienced life"? Is that right? Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 04:04 PM
1

Jeez. Who would want to share a partner? High chance someone is not happy with the arrangement. But whatever works for you I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 02:36 PM
1

I don't know if that if that was your intention but this reads like you currently have 3 long term partners at the same time?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 10:41 AM
1

Plenty of women are attracted to dark triad traits. Another lesson from red pill. And it is true. Also plenty of guys who don't smoke pot or play video games. 90% of guys watch porn so you can't really say that it is a factor since guys who do get laid also watch it. High status, powerful and authorative men are a small percentage by definition. Leaders require followers. Do you propose women form harems around these men?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 11:52 AM
1

A pretty black woman has no disadvantage really. Did you have a hard getting dates? Be honest. Any pretty woman has it easy, full stop. Pretty privilege is very real. Very few guys date based on color of skin. The only thing that matters is facial features and body shape. Anyway, you claim to be noble and brag about charity work all the time but meanwhile you comment history is filled with spiteful remarks made just to hurt people. To make them feel bad. That's not healthy honestly. Definitely s…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 11:44 AM
1

Hahahaha, so easy for you to say as a self professed pretty woman. Like a rich person telling the beggar on the street: tough luck, deal with it. What a joke. Pathetic. Do you want to live in a world witbout sympathy? Because that is what you are preaching.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 11:28 AM
1

Would you deny pretty privilege exist? Even for men looks are more important than personality nowadays. And some characteristics like height you simply cannot change. My point is that some people have harder, much harder and all they get to hear from the bluepill crowd is to explain their failure is: it's you personality. Weak response coming from the fallacy of a just world perspective. At least red pill has some sensible things to say like "hit the gym and lift", looksmax, pointing out how to …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 10:59 AM
1

You are not helping you know. Many people on here behave like bullies. Haha. You don't get sex. Haha. You are lame. Haha. Same shit over and over. Pathetic honestly. Weak spiteful people. Most of those reasons you mentioned like height, race, bone structure, etc... can significantly hold you back. But no, head firmly in the sand. ItS yOuR PErsoNaLiTy. Like a broken record.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 05:58 AM
1

Try going for years and years without any sex while having high libido and keeping you mental stability. Very tough. Depression can follow from it and is not even an unusual response. Most women could not understand since their libido is naturally lower. Also, if they do get that itch they can easily get it scratched and just order a guy over from OLD for example. Does that fulfill them romantically? No, but they do have that option which decreases the pressure. So sex is not a need like water i…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 06:34 AM
1

Do you know why? Because some women have a phase were they claim to be lesbian but end up with a dude. I have personally seen this up close 2 times. First time I was really flabbergasted. I was at a bar with some friends and this girl who was a friend of a friend came in with her girlfriend. Her being lesbian came up at some point. Nobody bats an eye. Totally acceptable. Had a nice evening. Next time I ser her, at some other social event, maybe 6 months to a year later she brought with her a boy…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 04:22 PM
4

Wow, it is so easy being an attractive woman. You basically just have to "exist" and you get attention and opportunity with the opposite sex for free. Unreal.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 07:29 PM
8

Specify "usually far and few in between"? Once a month, once a year? And "usually" means sometimes a few in a week?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 06:38 PM
1

You must be joking. The reproducibility crisis is mostly the result of very soft/vague defined metrics as well as flawed measurement methods that can be influenced by either subject or researcher. In this case the same result was reproduced many times over. And the reason why is it was reproduced often is because the nature of these questions is very simple. Like I said, just 2 very simple questions resulting in 2 numeric values. You can't fuck that up. Please, try again.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 04:46 PM
1

Wtf do you mean by "scientific evidence". All evidence comes from observation and measurement. That is exactly the same technique as they used to detect the higs boson particle for example. The only thing that is different is the subject and the method of measuring. Scientific evidence is the following. You take measurements, many, enough to draw a statistically significant conclusion from. Ideally 5 sigma or more for important scientific discoveries. That's it. There is no other way. Only if yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 03:57 PM
1

There is evidence. It is very simple. You ask a large number of people 2 questions. 1. What is your body count? 2. Have you ever cheated? Not directly like that but mixed with many other relationship type questions. You get the point. Anyway, this has been done many times over and the result is always the same. The higher the body count the higher chance of infidelity. Much higher too. These studies are posted frequently on this sub btw.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 03:37 PM
1

Always this advice for "professional therapy". Let me tell you, it does not work for everyone. In fact I believe it doesn't work (much) for most people. I speak from experience. First of all, these "professionals" are just humans like you and I with many personal flaws as well as using flawed methods. Second you have to be very lucky to find one that is a good match for you. A bad one can make things worse actually. There needs to be a certain connection and trust. Hard to find. Third, depending…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/22 06:57 AM
1

I did not write slutty anywhere. Not my comment. I had this comment saved somewhere because of the studies listed. Many similar comments have been posted on this sub but I forgot to save them. Funny how you can disregard everything because one word offends you though. Facts remain the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/22 06:13 AM
1

You are deliberately missing his point. I get that you are a bit angry and feel judged but you will simply have to live with the fact that a large percentage of the male population does find high n count women disgusting. It has been that way since forever and this will not change anytime soon.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/22 05:53 AM
1

It is well known and proven in many studies that high body count correlates with much higher chance of failed marriage/LTR and also higher chance of cheating. It makes sense. High n count people generally have impulse control issues and simply have developed a habit of sleeping around. Habits die hard. It is completely logical and understandable that a low n count guy would not want to be with a high n count woman. Too risky.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/22 05:33 AM
1

Well, I gave you a very concrete example. My sister. Through getting approached she, at the time, got immense validation from that. Relationships as well and it is not like these guys were assholes only interested in getting some action. Although, being a horny teenager that is always part of it anyway. My point is, because she was born as female she got free validation, experience with the opposite sex and relationships, all without really having to get out of her comfort zone and approach some…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/22 05:11 PM
1

You deliberately miss my point. All those things I said are true. Responsibility is on the man to pursue, make something happen. The woman can, if she wants, play a very passive role. Just react. This is a huge advantage. Especially if you are more introverted. Almost impossible to overcome as a man but for a woman? No problem. I know this is true for a fact. My sister and I grew up having very similar characters. Both introverted. She had zero problem attracting guys because she just had to rea…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/22 06:57 AM
1

Another reason why men and women will never be equals. You are just too damn passive. All the work needs to be done by the man. Carry the conversation, be interesting, engaging, charming, know when to escalate, etc... What does the woman have to do? Just show up and sit on her ass basically. Try to look pretty and not be a complete bitch. So easy, so privileged.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/22 05:36 AM
1

Men shaped and built this world. Houses, skyscrapers, entire cities, cars, roads, trains, train tracks, bridges, tunnels, airplanes, etc, etc, etc.. All of this is engineered, build and maintained mostly by men. Even the internet is a 90% male operation as anyone in IT would tell you. So now that we build the world to a level of comfort and convenience that women find acceptable enough to venture outside they immediately turn around on us and say: "we don't need you any more". It is absolutely c…
/r/MensRights17/08/22 06:32 AM
1

Ok, fair enough. I do think it is somewhat elitist to have a strict education requirement for a potential partner. I mean, I myself am "highly" educated but averse to this kind of classism. But I get your reasoning. There is a higher chance for compatibility through similar experience and background. I will admit that.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 07:09 AM
1

I don't have a solution. I am just pointing out the problem. An individual though, recognizing this, could overcome this bias in themselves and become more flexible in this regard and find a partner who is also more flexible. My sister for example makes way more money than her partner. Doesn't seem to be a problem. It can work out. Both partners should be secure in that situation though.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 06:48 AM
1

It is hilarious. Always the same thing. Men have an issue? Men are the problem. Women have an issue? Men are the problem. It is really becoming a problem in this society that we cannot address the fact that men as a group can be disadvantaged in some situations and are not themselves to blame.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 06:42 AM
1

This kind of thinking is why there will never be equality. It goes both ways. Women want their partner to earn more (or at least equal) and guys naturally feel like they need to provide for the family. Classic gender roles. And since both parties know the other's preference there is a 2nd aspect to it. Women don't want to be with a guy who feels insufficient and guys don't want their partner to not respect them and go for another dude with more resources. Meanwhile the feminists push for equity,…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 06:26 AM
1

As a white guy who is not especially successful with the ladies even I can admit that asian dudes (that are living in a western country) have it harder still, all else being the same. A significant percentage of women are sort of racist when it comes to dating choices and won't even consider going Asian. In contrast I've noticed that guys of all races are very much attracted to asian women. From the female side black women seem to have it the hardest I think.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 09:43 AM
1

Lol. I've lived my best life too. Just a different path. It is so funny the arrogance of these party kids thinking they somehow know how you should live life. No, you don't know. I have not missed out on anything. Hapiness does not come from these superficial activities you are so proud of. I don't think you have learned much yet if you think that.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 04:08 PM
1

Why do you ask?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 03:03 PM
1

Lol. Nice attempt. I don't give a fuck that some would consider it boring according to some current trends or whatever. I have been hiking with great satisfaction for 20 years. . Really getting that restless edgy kid vibe from this. Hahahahaha. Desperate trying to convince me I should try and "be interesting" (but of course only according to your narrow BS standards or "trends").
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 11:42 AM
1

I think you are also incredibly judgemental in how you label people "boring" who do not follow your path to be "deemed an interesting person". You state that "it makes you a more interesting person than following a linear path..." as if is a fact! Arrogance. Interesting to you maybe! Open your mind a little. Some of the most interesting people I have met followed a very stable linear path, at least outwardly. As a person they can still be very fun, kind, lots of interesting ideas, etc...
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 11:14 AM
1

Trying something like being an artist? How? Rich parents maybe? How will you pay the bills? I have traveled many places abroad. Hiking is my favorite thing. Seen lots of stuff. Very happy to. Do you know why I could do that? Because I had a my shit together and had high paying job. Flying all over the world is not cheap. Also fortunate to have good amount off free days. Even took a year sabattical and traveled more. And yeah, looking back, I was way more mature than those kids. You had your fun …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 10:53 AM
1

Not everyone is a thrill seeking addict when younger. Some people are naturally more grounded and down to earth. More mature I would say. The party kids in 20s thinking to be "edgy" and "having fun" were in reality total cringe and generally judgemental as hell. If you weren't crazy like them you were deemed "boring". Toxic bunch. Lol. I've known many like that. Insufferable. Problem is at 20 you are somewhat impressionable and have this fear of missing out. Total BS but yeah. Luckily I saw thro…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 10:27 AM
1

This is just the usual spin women pull to justify their AFBB behavior. Almost no guy, given the choice, would prefer having to play the dating for months over a "spur of the moment" kind of thing. The latter can evolve to a relationship anyway. And just because it usually doesn't come up does not mean guys are OK with their girlfriend's slutty past. They would just rather not know.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 10:02 AM
1

Wow, what a ridiculous argument. Some women who are raped actually have an orgasm (against their will of course). It is a physical response that can be hard to control. Should we also say that those women must have wanted it and so therefore it cannot have been rape after all? Of course not. Same for men.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 10:33 AM
4

You are 100% right. The matriarchy is slowly taking away all value men traditionally could provide in relationships and families while maintaining female privileges. It is funny because instinctually most women still want their partners to earn more or at least equal to themselves and at the same you have these feminists demanding ridiculous things like equity: equal pay for less then equal work (less hours of actual work, less demanding jobs, paid maternity leave, paid menstrual leave, etc, etc…
/r/MensRights16/07/22 12:43 PM
2

Well... I guess it can sting to hear something like that. I would say that most men get a reality check somewhat earlier in life but yeah.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/22 04:01 PM
5

You have my respect for that because (some) women really need to hear that. How do they take it?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/22 03:10 PM
7

Indeed. It is always, always the men who need to "improve themselves". Never women because they are already perfect of course. The superiority complex and entitlement is off the charts.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/22 10:53 AM
11

It is hilarious really. Always the burden is on men to improve themselves, "to be worthy of a woman's attention". Never do women get this advice. No, they are perfect angels, each one deserving a prince on a white horse, just for existing. How about men and women are equal? How about average women lose their superiority complex and stop looking down on average men, who are their equal.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/22 10:47 AM
36

I encourage you consider joining r/MensLib. It's a fantastic sub for guys like you to uplift each other and hold each other accountable Lol at the "holding each other accountable". Nevermind that menslib is a terrible sub.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 07:26 PM
1

My point was that those guys still make effort to pursue. Do you think women just walk up to them and ask them for sex? No, that is the role of men. Well, not straight up because women don't like that. So you need to play a game. 'Having game' is not the term for no reason. And lesbians have the least amount of sex of all with the most dead bedrooms situations in LTRs. Meanwhile gay men have the most, way more then heteros. Male libido, on average, is just on a different level from women It is a…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/21 07:05 AM
0

Are you one of those gender is a cultural construct types of people that completely ignore the physical realities of our bodies? Do you think you can 'evolve' your mind by sheer will? Let me ask, did you choose your current my mind then? No, you inherited it. It is a product from the past with it's lessons embodied in it. If you chose to ignore the intuition, signals that your body is giving you you will have a very bad time. Like when you place your hand above a burning candle. Your body will s…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/21 06:41 AM
1

Those guys still do the pursuing, have game and some skills to seduce women. A woman needs none of that and generally plays a passive, selective role. Women are the gatekeepers of sex. This is common knowledge. If it were up to men, we would be fucking many different women constantly. But women generally don't want that. They need a romantic angle most of the time while for guys, just sex is just fine. This is why gay guys are having so much sex as well. With way more partners on average then he…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/21 09:33 PM
2

Keep living that blue pill fantasy dude. A (hetero) man cannot be a slut since he is the one who pursues and fucks while the woman is the fuckee. Different roles. Women are the gatekeepers of sex. Common knowledge. Modern times are a bit different but it used to be that a man who sleeps around with many women also received a lot off offspring. Like for example, half of Mongolians today are a direct descendant from djenghis khan. You can call someone like that an animal but he was extremely succe…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/21 09:18 PM
3

Anecdotes. As far as that goes I have many from IRL that prove the opposite. It is well known fact that women prefer taller guys. For example, women flat out put height requirements in their OLD profile. Doesn't make that big of a difference. Wow. I am left to conclude that you are an idiot.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/21 08:24 PM
2

Male libido is way different from women's. We are simply wired to spread our seed as wide as possible. That is why men with options almost always exercise them. To want sex with as many different women as possible is our nature. You can be a 'high libido' woman but it still not the same. Also, as a man it takes at least some talent and/or skills to 'exercise options'. For a women it takes none. Just 'exist' and spread your legs for the next guy who comes nocking on your door. That is why a guy w…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/21 11:37 AM
5

Haha, height doesn't make a difference he says. How can you be that out of touch with reality? Seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/21 11:18 AM
6

He must have been fired because of the patriarchy surely?
/r/MensRights20/07/21 05:21 AM
2

Sure, misunderstanding. People are generally very aggressive here (me included sometimes I will admit) so it is easy to assume a personal attack. Sorry about that. Ugh, I should really leave this place. It is becoming an unhealthy addiction, haha :) Enjoy your day!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/21 04:57 PM
4

You read someones entire post history? This is the exact reason why I create a new account every few months. I don't think I have ever complained yet about my personal situation or directly compared myself to others. I try to keep in general. But maybe you were referring to some other guy, whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/21 04:39 PM
3

70/80 percent? It gets you through the door (the initial instant judgement) while otherwise you would be left outside.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/21 03:53 PM
3

Sure, those guys also exist. But how many? The problem is they make many victims so their number looks greatly inflated. OPs and my comments was in the context of 'not being able to get a relationship'. Like; at all. Not even a start. Abusers and cheaters are by definition in some sort of relationship already.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/21 02:27 PM
6

Yup exactly. I am not denying the mental aspect is important, especially for average guys. They need to make up for it somehow. But that can be very hard when faced with constant rejection. And then you get these blue pillers saying it is all your own fault. All because of your personality. Meanwhile attractive dudes get away with so much stuff. Anyway, enough ranting. Enjoy your day :)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/21 02:19 PM
15

Sure, but women and blue pill idiots on here massively downplay how much of a factor physical attractiveness is. It is huge. It changes your entire game and perception.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/21 01:46 PM
7

Nonsense. Misogyny, for the most part, is only skin deep. It will disappear very quickly after some affection from the opposite sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/21 01:37 PM
1

Haha, for real. This person does not agree with you, has no arguments, so starts labeling you with a nonsense label like 'alt right' and attacks their projection they have of someone who would fit that label instead. Next you will be called a Nazi, fascist or white supremacists. How do these people exist?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/21 01:11 PM
23

Delusional take. Let's compare. A 5'2 out of shape, broke, balding guy who believes himself to be a player. A rich, handsome 6'2, athletic build guy who is shy, struggling with some misogyny and believes he is not good enough for woman. Who will get success? Clearly the second. He will even get cold approached by women. I've seen it happen. You see, all these character flaws you point out out will be instantly forgiven as long as you are attractive enough. And then, from there on you can build o…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/21 12:51 PM
8

It becomes bi-directional later on. Sexual frustration is definitely first though. Very clear to see. If you are regularly getting layed and have a positive relationship with someone from the opposite sex why develop misogyny or misandry? That would be a very rare occurrence.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/21 12:15 PM
26

Complete and utter bullshit. It is very simple, if you are attractive many opportunities with the opposite sex simply present itself without effort. It is a completely different experience. It is like seeing the world through rosey glasses. Downside is that it makes you blind to the plight of others. Like a rich person complaining poor people are lazy while they in fact might work even harder then himself. Privilege is invisible to those that have it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/21 11:38 AM
7

Haha, funny :). It is a bit over the top but there is truth in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/21 11:26 AM
37

You got one crucial thing the wrong way around though. Sexual frustration and inability to form relationship with the opposite sex CAUSES misogyny (or misandry) if it persists. It is not an effect of the latter. Afterwards the two amplify each other. The actual cause for the first one (not being able to form a relationship) might be completely unrelated. Like not being good looking, too short, fat or just unlucky. It could also be some past trauma from childhood or whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/21 10:30 AM
1

Haha, I see, you were talking about 10mm (1 cm). I thought 10cm. Misread. Well just wear sneakers with thick soles and you are there. It will not do much no but I get why a smaller guy would do it though. Women are absolutely mercilessly judging and filtering men by height.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/21 09:32 AM
5

Not true, I have met plenty of women that I respect. Very intelligent women that mostly not go along with this, wearing little or better yet no makeup. And yes, I can see that difference. The funny thing is that OPs point about artificially increasing your hight is actually socially acceptable for women. High heels. Hilarious. I look at it like this: if you are going to dress like a doll and paint your face like a doll I am going to treat you as a one. Simple. You can't expect to be taken seriou…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/21 09:25 AM
1

The dating pool for serious LTR potential will significantly decrease, maybe less so if you are super hot yes. So we sort of agree. An average looking, 30+, single mom will have serious trouble finding a partner that wants to commit though.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/21 09:10 AM
7

Women absolutely DO care about that 10cm though. I agree it is pathetically insecure of the guy. Same with women and make up though, except that is normalized. That is the whole point of the OP of this thread. It is honestly hard to see women as equals when they are so insecure that they cannot go outside in public without painting their face.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/21 08:12 AM
0

And even if true, by your own words your sister is the exception to the rule. Do you think every single mom at 30+ can get a top 1% guy? Mathematically impossible. Either you are lying about this guy (likely) or your sister somehow found a unicorn.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/21 06:11 AM
-2

Sure, haha, and I am a 6'5 millionaire athlete. I hope your sister will at least bear him his own children otherwise it is like the worst situation for a guy imaginable.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/21 06:06 AM
1

So your sister is hot and found her self a nice beta buck. So what? I do feel sorry for that dude though, no guy should have to take care of another man's child.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 09:27 PM
4

Right back at you. This sub has really opened my eyes about women's misandry and toxic feminity. How some of you are actually in LTRs is baffling to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 08:42 PM
2

Completely delusional advise. Only women and maybe the top 10% of men can do this.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 03:03 PM
–

You are right of course. Both man and women can have negative traits.. Just from my experience though women are equally or even more superficial and dismissive of a man's personality. Zero effort to get to know the guy. That is, if he is not very good looking. If he is, a lot of negative traits are suddenly forgiven. This is from first hand experience, from dating many women. It has really disillusioned me about the 'fairer' sex. You basically either have to be hot or lacking that be some sort o…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 02:58 PM
7

Exactly, people suck at statistics. The mode is way more relevant then the average in this case. The average n count is almost completely meaningless really. To make it simple: 9 guys having 0 partners and 1 guy having 100 partners makes an average of 10. Conclusion: there is no sexlessness!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 09:25 AM
3

Unique and interesting personality? Pretty much all of them? No way. Some are just boring as F. or entitled, bitchy, superficial, dense, whatever. Still can be attractive physically though, enough to put up with it, at least long enough to get to the business.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 05:35 AM
2

Absolutely. It is crazy. On the one hand they demand equality, bash on 'toxic masculinity', demonize men but then when it comes time to actually find a partner all of the sudden they do a 180 and want a manly man who earns more then them, can provide, is tall, etc... Like split brain personality. One directly opposes the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 04:59 AM
0

Seriously, the laziness and entitlement of women is so off putting. Imagine that, just sitting on your ass and selecting among suitors who approach you and do all the work. What an easy time. No wonder your egos get inflated like crazy. Lower tier you say? Only problem is that this 'lower tier' is like at least 80% of men. I wonder how many men fit your standard: https://igotstandardsbro.com/ And then on top of this supremecy in the dating market you also want equality (or better yet equity even…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 08:08 PM
1

Harsh lesson to learn. I have come to the exact same conclusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/21 04:38 PM
6

True egalitarianism is the only way forward. The label Feminism itself is inherently divisive. It is literally in the word: female. It might mean equality in theory (depending on the book you read) but in practice it means woman good, man bad. Would you yourself follow a movement called "masculinism" that claims to be all about gender equality (we promise) but meanwhile only ever seeks to advantage men? Of course not, it is a joke. Same as feminism. It is not about equality at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 08:42 PM
4

She won't as she is not interested in the truth. It would be an eye opener for sure. One problem though is that since women rate 80% of men below average, the "average" guy she would pick for this experiment would probably be top 20% (in looks) leading to different results.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 03:37 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter