TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TopTopTotalitarian Archive

View 0 posts and 27 comments by TopTopTotalitarian on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Scrutiny and accusations are different. Obviously.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 01:56 PM
0

Lol. You don't 'let' your girl have guy friends on account of she isn't property. If you're too insecure for her to have guy friends, she can find someone that isn't.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 01:55 PM
0

Then attack the policy for that reason. Don't make baseless assumptions about someone based on gender. Pretty common sense idea right?
/r/MensRights02/07/22 01:52 PM
0

We don't know. And assuming it was because she was a woman is sexist. And obviously so.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 01:44 PM
0

Because the conversation is whether or not men were privileged historically. And the obvious answer is yes. Doesn't mean anything bad about men. It's not mens fault. But it still existed.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 01:40 PM
3

There are many female lawyers. If she was hired purely for being a woman, they could have hired any one of them. This woman was clearly more qualified. Why are you desperate to find a way to justify that she wasn't qualified? We will never really know. Why not just not assume bad things about women because they are women?
/r/MensRights02/07/22 01:35 PM
-1

Civilians were the majority. And no American civilians died.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 01:31 PM
2

I have no idea. That's not easily found info. Do you have any reason to believe she wasn't qualified?
/r/MensRights02/07/22 01:30 PM
1

3 percent was the global population. Us population would be dramatically less than 3 percent. I checked for you. It was .2 percent of the population.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 01:28 PM
-5

Being 100 percent reliant on another human for food and shelter is not as good as you might think. But most men didn't go to war. 3 percent of the population died during ww2 and the majority were civilians.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 01:21 PM
3

The post specifically said that women have been given key positions in an effort of reverse discrimination. I think an assistant AG gets promoted to AG all the time and there's no reason to assume gender was a factor. But clearly everyone disagrees with me. Just not providing any context as to why.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 01:19 PM
-20

Yes. You'd rather have been a woman in those days. Many women disagree.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 11:51 AM
-40

Each gender had advantages and disadvantages. However men for centuries had for more control over their lives which is the privilege women talk about. Yes, many died in war. But the vast majority didn't and still had more autonomy than women. Trying to argue men weren't privileged historically is impossible to argue. It's like trying to argue that white people weren't privileged historically because white people died in war.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 11:29 AM
-17

Because you don't like hearing opinions if they aren't the same as yours. That seems like an unfair reason to ban someone.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 11:23 AM
-69

I don't think men dying in war means men weren't privileged. Those statements aren't related at all. Many men died in the Civil War but at this time women did not have the legal right to own land. Hard to say men weren't privileged over women at that point.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 11:11 AM
3

What's wrong with today's men?
/r/MensRights02/07/22 10:52 AM
-6

Posting on mens rights gets you banned by other subs. Posting here on your main is a bad idea. People seem to think there are baseless sexist accusations on this sub. I'm trying to find out if that's true
/r/MensRights02/07/22 10:44 AM
-80

So fire her and hire that woman. Doesn't mean she was hired for her gender. She had the experience. This is a stupid politician problem. Not a hiring women problem.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 10:38 AM
2

I also don't recommend being a sex pest. If a girl says no to X. Don't try to convince her to do X. That's the kind of things girls feel pressured into doing when they are nervous and it's slimy.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 10:36 AM
-100

Mods, please note that rather than explaining why he called a woman a diversity hire, zogins would rather just get out of the conversation because he has no evidence to back it up and now he's feeling insecure.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 10:34 AM
-5

I'm not criticizing. I'm saying claims like that need to be backed up. Saying someone was hired based only on their gender is very insulting to people and making that claim should come with evidence. No need to get defensive about it.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 10:32 AM
12

Well my suggestion is don't choke a woman you barely know without consent after she has said no to anything other than a hand job. If you've been doing that, you have every right to be scared and you clearly don't worry about consent. If you haven't been doing that, I think you're okay.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 10:30 AM
-11

Who would you say is more qualified? It's a bold claim to say someone with her experience was hired just because of her gender. We should back up claims like that so it doesn't look like baseless sexism.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 10:25 AM
-63

She has her masters in financial services and served as the assistant attorney General prior to being named attorney General. Isn't Assistant attorney General the person with the best experience to become attorney General? Was there a man that you felt had better experience than assistant attorney General? If she sucks at her job, fire her. But blaming her gender and suggesting she was a diversity hire seems like a stretch with her resume. Edit: is suggesting a woman was qualified when hired rea…
/r/MensRights02/07/22 10:18 AM
26

As a man, I take 0 credit for the men that have died in war before me. If you want to take credit for the heroic things men have done in the past, don't you also need to take credit for the terrible things men have done in the past? I make my own decisions and only my decisions should be used to evaluate me.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 10:09 AM
25

Found the post. He choked her without consent, became very aggressive in his language, and continued to push her for more than just a hand job even after she said that's all she wanted to do. The top 2 posts did not say to report it and the third said report in case he has done this with other women and there's a pattern. Not file charges, just report it. The fact that a woman reporting a man for choking her without consent makes you think women are terrible is...off putting. Also, why leave out…
/r/MensRights02/07/22 10:06 AM
1

The top 10 posts on r feminism are all about abortion except for one about how women shouldn't be judged by their looks alone. And another about how the government could use period tracking apps to prosecute women looking for abortions. None of those seem like female superiority to me. Your claim is 8 out of 10 are pushing female superiority but it really seems like 0 out of 10.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 09:52 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter