~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 85 | Does anyone else have a problem with the lack of epstimological rigor of feminist theory and criminology? | discussion | Top_Mammoth4530 | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 01/11/25 12:55 AM |
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Let's say something nice about the opposite sex.I am someone who has only mildly dabbled into the gender wars a few months ago and now has his feed filled to the brim with these notifications. I cannot think of anything nice about the opposite sex because they are unfortunately human and as a neo classical realist (international politics sense) idealogue I cannot awknowledge humans are good. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/11/25 06:55 AM |
| 2 | Does anyone else have a problem with the lack of epstimological rigor of feminist theory and criminology?Eh... Really? I find that any disciplinary with the word 'studies' is not that great. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 02/11/25 07:03 PM |
| 2 | Does anyone else have a problem with the lack of epstimological rigor of feminist theory and criminology?But it's shoddy research... Being disruptive while being wrong isn't a virtue. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 02/11/25 07:03 PM |
| 2 | Does anyone else have a problem with the lack of epstimological rigor of feminist theory and criminology?This is a interesting point to make. This was geniunely reminiscent of mearsheimer just to a lesser scale. Mearsheimer is reminiscent of Trump just to a lesser scale. My mom is a trumper and despite the fact the things she advocates for are different from feminists she feels alot like the feminist works I've read. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 02/11/25 01:50 PM |
| 4 | Does anyone else have a problem with the lack of epstimological rigor of feminist theory and criminology?Please do. I am really coping and seething over this. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 01/11/25 10:47 PM |
| 7 | Does anyone else have a problem with the lack of epstimological rigor of feminist theory and criminology?International relations, my only other reference, and economics are obsessively epistmolgically rigirous. Why should feminism not be held to the same intellectual standard? | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 01/11/25 03:24 PM |
| 1 | Does anyone else have a problem with the lack of epstimological rigor of feminist theory and criminology?I can't get past the moderators and post my question because it violates some unknown rule. The second question I feel is sophistry. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 01/11/25 03:21 PM |
| 2 | Does anyone else have a problem with the lack of epstimological rigor of feminist theory and criminology?That makes sense. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 01/11/25 01:25 PM |
| 4 | Does anyone else have a problem with the lack of epstimological rigor of feminist theory and criminology?I'm reconstructing this from memory. Hence why I was uncertain about this and wanted validation, I tried asking ask feminists but couldn't get past the moderators. I also didn't write down citations for stuff from SAGE. I just read stuff and got mad. There's too papers in particular that annoyed me. I can't remember the titles but one was about the manosphere. The other was about metoo The most egregious example I think comes to mind was when a author asserted that 1. The manosphere is white sup… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 01/11/25 01:09 PM |
| 4 | Does anyone else have a problem with the lack of epstimological rigor of feminist theory and criminology?I tried asking them... But my posts got removed by the mods. Anyways I don't even care at all for male rights. I'm just mad about this shit. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 01/11/25 12:59 PM |
| – | Men are no longer the center of universe and some men can't adaptFirst thing I'd like to point out is a patriarchal (or matriachical) society's primary threat isn't woman. It never was and even to this day I'd argue it isn't. It's other socities. Something which everyone annoyingly forgets is that once farming existed you kinda had to wage war. Realism became de facto true because the more land you had the more food stability you had. The more food stability you had the less likely you were to die from starvation. The earliest documented patriachies are Egypt… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/10/25 02:30 AM |
| 1 | Men are no longer the center of universe and some men can't adaptWe are all humans, biological essentialism might exist slightly but it's probably a small standard deviation. There were female warrior communes in Africa and they gained wealth by enslaving men. Hillary Clinton advocated we shoot down Russia jets over Syria. Catherine the great commited a attempted genocide on Poland. Wu zhetian (if you believe Chinese historians and not westerns) was a cruel despot. The iroquois confederacy, a matriachy was a aggressive tribe that commited genocide over tradin… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/10/25 10:01 PM |
| 1 | Women are one of if not the main cause of wars due to sexual selection.This is somewhat unrelated but there was a massive ww0 a few thousand years ago where every human decided we all needed to kill each other and the current best guess was either food starvation from hunger or that sexual relations no longer worked as communities got larger. There's more evidence for the former theory from my understanding but I like the idea humans killed 90% of humans over sex. Not applicable to the modern world and this information can be used by literally anyone in the subredd… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/10/25 09:20 PM |
| 2 | Why Shame and Social Pressure Aren’t Always Bad ThingsI'm Chinese let's talk. Chinese woman and men hate feminism. Fei hua. Despise it. Do you know what else they hate? Not being in stem. Woman literally never marry in China and family supports it because more men exist and sex is 100% transactional so bad that men pay tens millions in equivlant property for marriage and the government had to step in to blow stuff up. No pressure does not make things better. It maximises materialism as everyone is trying to exploit one another. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/10/25 06:58 AM |
| 1 | Society actively mitigates biological disadvantages for women, but systemically entrenches them for men.Dumbass here. This is just one small problem but the real risk is that as far as I can tell the best predictor for chinese mega civil war is lonely men... And here I am in Canada looking at the USA elect Trump threatening to annex us. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/10/25 04:23 AM |
| 1 | I’m a feminist, I want to have a civil talkI think something I might need to highlight with a high degree of urgency is just how bad the anti empircism of modern feminism has gotten and how deeply it has entrenched itself. I will say this with some urgency because I just found out about this problem today. My sample size is small so I have no means of cross referencing as I just met up. I just attended a woman in politics meeting in university. It was accidental as it was in the cafe. Of some note is that when I asked for citations none … | /r/MensRights | 15/10/25 11:26 AM |
| 0 | I’m a feminist, I want to have a civil talkHello sorry for the hate to the OP. I'll apologise on our behalf. Ignore the hate. It's nice to reach across the aisle and your brave for making first contact. Apologies this is a wordy read because I use intellectual jargon, I tried to cut down on it but I've been in university for too long and took international relations. The only thing readers need to know is positivism is the idea we can treat the social sciences like real science with hypothesis tests ect. I considered myself feminist up u… | /r/MensRights | 15/10/25 10:56 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter