TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Toronomi Archive

View 0 posts and 115 comments by Toronomi on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

The last part is beautiful. Milo presents an argument that counters the presenter's accusation that the economists not taking the gender pay gap seriously - by mentioning that his numbers come from Christina Hoff Sommers, herself a self-proclaimed feminist. The presenter, having been completely countered but still adamant on ignoring facts in favour of narrative, says (in paraphrase) "Good for her, she is not part of our narrative. Feminist person, final thoughts/words to you because you need to…
/r/MensRights10/07/16 07:21 PM
19

actual feminists out there who aren't misandrists The largest feminist organization in the US recently gave a prize to a woman who falsely accused, harrassed and tried to destroy an innocent man's life. That same organization also fights against equal parenting rights. I think it's fair to say that the word "feminist" has grown to be something that describes exactly that behaviour, and that behaviour is toxic/misandrist in nature. There's still "egalitarian" as an alternative term, where it aims…
/r/MensRights10/07/16 07:16 PM
1

Noth both, all three parties. A child raised by a couple that doesn't want a child yet keeps it anyway is likely to end up with serious psychological issues.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 11:59 PM
65

Because the idea that a person should have more, or less, rights based on what genitalia they have is morally corrupt and thus we oppose it. That didn't really take too much effort, nor did it even need to be long.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 05:42 AM
1

I wouldn't say "as" bad, but it definitely hurts both genders.
/r/MensRights07/11/15 02:14 AM
1

Minority or majority matters little when the group as a whole is based around saying your feelings are truth and no difference of opinion is allowed within. Even those that remain silent on the matter are supporting the idea/its effects, since large swaths of the silent majority will still react (relatively violently) to any criticism of the minority in their group.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 07:06 PM
8

The difference is that men are held responsible for their actions and a lot of the time women do not face similar responsibility. While not all women will be like this, the ones that have ever started trying it usually end up accomplishing it, thus getting incentive to lie and deflect blame for her actions in the future.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 04:59 PM
22

Well, there's physical evidence that the foreskin contains a huge amount of nerves, therefore being very sensitive compared to the rest of the penis.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 06:03 AM
21

but it has had no impact on my life whatsoever. But, it's a piece of you that was cut off without reason. We could all lose our little toes and we wouldn't really be affected in any noticeable way; doesn't mean it's right to start chopping them off of newborn children. At the very least, the decision should be theirs when they're old enough to make such a decision. PS: i'm circumcised, but for medical reasons. IMO that's the only valid reason for circumcising a young child.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 06:03 AM
1

If at all possible, try to see a doctor about a decent drug test with some evidence of it being done by a qualified doctor. Once you have solid evidence a part of what she said is false and you act reasonably against this, it helps make your case. Since there's claims of agressiveness, also be as polite as you can, for much the same reason.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 05:54 AM
1

There are things we don't try, because we know they'd work and the fact they'd work would have profoundly awkward implications for the feminist/progressive narrative. So, you are arguing against currently known methods that work, in favour of... "things we don't try". Would you care to elaborate and provide some evidence on that? You can't simply call bullshit and not provide any evidence. So far, all there is the observed reality, which you argue against. You claim to be arguing based on logic,…
/r/MensRights02/09/15 09:27 PM
2

Doctors must refrain from mutilating the body to affect a superficial change in apparent gender when anatomy and genetics are in agreement. But the mind is not in agreement, which leads to (mental) pain and high chance of suicide. Health is not only the physical body. Doctors have sworn oaths to help their patients, even if the tools they have aren't perfect they are better than letting the patient suffer. Life isn't fair. So just let the people with problems that have working solutions suffer?
/r/MensRights02/09/15 11:28 AM
2

From your post, i got a different idea (and what i think they certainly will do); not censor entire subreddits, but the specific users. Essentially, having a large list means that anyone in it posting something in an unrelated subreddit is liable to be censored by downvotes, based on the decisions of... well, whoever made the list.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 08:44 PM
2

I seriously doubt it's for that, it's just so that if they encounter you 'in the wild' (in an unrelated subreddit, in a default or in SRD or wherever), they can downvote you on sight Didn't you just agree with what he said?
/r/MensRights30/07/15 07:41 PM
4

This. People who consider one another equals, communicate. Wether that be by debate, argument, or even loudly yelling at one another when they're angry - that's all human. Once you decide someone needs "re-education", you have removed their agency. You no longer treat them as an equal, they are only a lower being that has to obey your rule.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 03:09 AM
1

Interesting world you live in. :P
/r/MensRights23/07/15 03:01 AM
13

That's not really an accomplishment, is it?
/r/MensRights18/07/15 03:52 PM
8

the scientist with a shirt being a prime example, people bought the shirt in droves just to piss off the feminists that decided to attack the guy. Just FYI, that man (who helped land an artificla object on a freaking asteroid, one of mankind's biggest achievements thus far) was harassed and assaulted until he broke down. "backfiring" is true in that everyone who isn't a feminist went "what the fuck?", but the damage was done. As an individual, if you get targeted by a large hate group like radic…
/r/MensRights18/07/15 01:38 PM
2

But of course, only men harass the other sex.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 04:07 PM
2

It was a conversation between the doctors. I think you're missing some of the point here; it wasn't all "between" the doctors. Some of the examples were while the man was very much still conscious and speaking, but after the anesthetics had been supplied. She verbally thrashed him because she knew he would not be able to remember and thus she'd get away with it.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 12:05 AM
6

Arguably, holding someone's head under water until they are forced to breathe water is attempted murder by drowning. Or perhaps it's "just" waterboarding... but either way that should be labeled what it is; a severe crime.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 10:21 PM
1

you fucking moron, you can't debate in here because posts get CENSORED AND DELETED. HOLY FUCK YOU'RE A IDIOT. LOL! this is why we only do debates that are LIVE so you piece of shit cowards can't CENSOR the opponent when you wet your panties over something you don't like. Edit: oh look all the comments got deleted just as predicated you cowardly piece of shit lol! So... mission accomplished. I mean, your message contains a total of 6 insults and various other expletives. It's copypasted across va…
/r/MensRights07/06/15 05:08 AM
2

Debates such as the videos linked by OP? Honestly, you can call names all you like. My skin is thick enough for it, and i'm honestly enjoying the display. :3
/r/MensRights07/06/15 03:02 AM
3

You have no replied to any of my statements or questions. I'm open for a debate, you seem to be open only for baseless insulting and reposting parody images. I don't need to show up, i'm right here and you are not interacting except in a nonproductive way. I do hope you're enjoying yourself, though. :3
/r/MensRights07/06/15 02:45 AM
2

So... a screenshot showing deleted posts (entirely possible/likely to be deleted by the poster, not mods) that comes along with: comparing everyone here to nazis. calling us various insults like coward, piece of shit, etc. posts only of deleted posts, zero ban messages. The funny thing about this is that there are plenty of comments which are "opposing" MRA view and stay up, albeit downvoted. It's fairly easy to go through the list of posts and just scroll down, look at the downvoted comments. F…
/r/MensRights07/06/15 02:05 AM
11

There's actually plenty of people (mainly feminists) who truly believe false accusations never happen, or happen only in numbers so small as to be statistically worthless. The more videos like this are out there, the more evidence there is to disprove that logic and make it clear that there is a serious issue, since few people are recording 24/7.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 06:35 AM
3

I'm not fine with the 'art' itself either - since when does artistic expression allow you to ignore the laws? Any man doing something as sexual like this would instantly be labeled sex offender. Also, it's fairly clear she is not much of a victim of 'sexual assault'. Someone who had actually been sexually assaulted would be TERRIFIED at the thought of sitting nude and blindfolded in public, yet she opted for that purely by herself. Basically, this sounds like a woman using her body to get good g…
/r/MensRights28/04/15 01:22 PM
2

HR is meant to offer (some) care to employees and, more importantly, aid the company. Avoiding lawsuits of unsafe work environments and workplace harassment is part of that and if HR is involved by him first, it sets up some protection against her, as she seems like the type of person that will pick a fight with any means just to win. As she's a (dishonest, sexist) woman that's not unlikely to lead to a false rape / sexual harassment accusation on OP. Going to HR sets a paper trail of "he compla…
/r/MensRights27/04/15 02:02 PM
2

I'm not so sure if sexism is petty. Not being allowed within a certain area of a club based on gender is kind of a big thing.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 12:36 PM
1

Unless they're bisexual. I can imagine men surpressing part of their sexuality due to society pushing for marriage and man-woman relationships. In fact, lots of BP men have their sexualities surpessed anyways, as they simply do what's "right" according to BP thinking. You're right that a fully straight man wouldn't, but it's entirely possible to discover you're mildly bicurious or even that your sexuality has changed slightly over time. After all, sexuality isn't black and white.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/15 03:49 PM
31

Belgian artist called Jeroom. Original comic (spotted this years ago in a magazine): http://pbs.twimg.com/media/BGN26sSCIAAGX-O.jpg:large "woman approaching!", "it's not a woman, it's a ladyboy! a converted man!", "with big breast implants" are the translations of what the man in orange says.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 02:17 AM
13

Do some searching on the origins of rape culture - it was a term from a documentary on prison rape before it got hijacked by feminism.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/14 06:46 PM
1

That's not catcalling by this law. From what i've seen of the dutch version of the law, it includes "denigrating" in its definition. If you say "you look beautiful", then that is not in any way disrespectful. Wether they take offence or not, police isn't going to act on something that's easily disproven with a dictionary.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/14 06:44 PM
3

It's not even pro male, it's against rapists getting paid for their crime. I can definitely understand how feminists would hate on it regardless, though.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 02:00 PM
4

It's called satire and can be a great tool to highlight a ridicilous line of thinking.
/r/TheRedPill03/09/14 05:54 AM
2

This is why i use two accounts. Don't mix standard use and controversial subreddits: all the gain with zero risk from ban-happy doctrine.
/r/TheRedPill01/09/14 03:11 AM
19

Theft, physical damage, harassment and physical violence against employees. If nobody wants to work there and goods keep being stolen, the shop loses its profit instantly.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 12:41 PM
2

He was disagreeing but did not explain why, that's why downvoting occured. He called rape a big problem without giving reliable statistics (self-reporting surveys are widely unreliable for statistics) and called OP's statistics flawed, again without a real explanation besides saying they're flawed. Basically, the OP in this thread is wrong because the poster thinks so - this isn't something of value and should be downvoted. Explaining your points tends to be a good idea when you try to correct s…
/r/MensRights30/08/14 12:05 PM
3

It's sitting at -8 for shoving one's opinion over someone else's ("your statistics are extremely flawed", but this is never actually explained) while linking to statistics that are more easily falsified. If you can't back things up, don't make a wild claim. As for the posting. Welcome to reddit, this is literally the same in ANY subreddit unless you jump through some extra hoops in validating your account. This has nothing to do with mensrights "censoring", it's simply your lack of knowledge on …
/r/MensRights29/08/14 09:59 PM
10

You work with statistics yet believe anonymous reports of a crime to be more trustworthy than one that goes to official channels? Any statistic can be falsified, but there is a world of difference between going to the police, speaking to a human being and facing consequences for straight lies compared to an anonymous online survey. I suggest doing some research on brigading as termed on reddit; communities like srs fresuently group up and mass-abuse things like surveys to make their opinions loo…
/r/MensRights29/08/14 06:55 AM
4

As the other poster said. It means consent has to be constant, ie every step of the way. You have to ask over and over for consent during, but only if you're a man. If a woman thinks no but doesn't say anything, it is rape. All responsibility is on the male to 'prove' consent, which is pretty impossible. Basically, this law alliws a woman to have sex, regret her own actions and have an innocent man punished as revenge. 'Justice'.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 06:29 AM
2

Well, let those fed up with feminism vent, it at least helps spread awareness. Not all threads are equally constructive, but nothing stops anyone from contributing and opposing views with respectful discussions are welcome. That's plenty i think; if people can't vent about how sexism (perpetrated against them by feminism) harms them here, where else can they? The vast majority of communities are socially correct to the point critisizing a woman's idea or opinion is marked mysoginy. :/ Don't expe…
/r/MensRights29/08/14 06:18 AM
19

Those statistics are worse, actually. Anonymously reporting means anyone can call rape regardless of actual events. If police is involved, proven false allegations get filtered out, at least. Remember: there's feminists out there that view men walking within 5 feet of a woman as (attempted) rapists and there's women that view a one night stand involving any alcohol as rape, even if the man was more drunk. Don't enable that type of behaviour with the numbers you linked. Any number of rapes can be…
/r/MensRights29/08/14 05:55 AM
17

Feminists like to come here, post things that are clearly sexist or hateful, catch the flak they deserve and then delete their post to make it go away. This isn't censorship; opposing viewpoints aren't removed unless they break rules. Unlike feminist threads, coming here in a respectful manner is applauded rather than censored. Show a single thread like op's, screenshots of a ban message and communication with a mod. Oh wait, those don't exist and (so far) no feminists have gone through the effo…
/r/MensRights29/08/14 05:46 AM
6

Wow, plenty of downvoting in this thread so far. On the statement in the title; yes. How could it not be the case? Feminism is a lot larger than the men's right movement, ingrained into western society. The idea of men having rights that are being trampled on in favour of women's is new. men's rights are often tossed together with pick up artists and the red pill ideology, then the entire group is treated together. Give it time, continue spreading word about issues with as much evidence as you c…
/r/MensRights25/08/14 10:01 PM
7

These are a few of the points i see. They're the biggest ones in my personal opinion, but i see them a lot in discussions in this subreddit. Feminism (strongly) supports primary agressor laws and the duluth model. If you are male, you are considered the perpetrator automatically. Due to mainstream feminist support, this form of sexism is legal and harms male victims all the time, as they can't be a victim even if they are the one wounded and bleeding. Feminism disregards the possibility of false…
/r/MensRights24/08/14 02:15 AM
2

When it comes down to it though, MRA is the movement that gets censored illegally. If they merely disagree, they certainly go far to silence the other ideas rather than attempting debate.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 08:51 PM
1

Have an upvote: you hit the nail on its head. I feel like we should try and stay above this type of thing; we're fighting for rights for all men but this situation has many factors. Your friend is also someone who needs a spotlight, maybe actions like his could wake some people to (some/a lot of) feminist talking points being constructed for their purpose
/r/MensRights18/08/14 06:23 AM
1

It was nice. Had not much to do with the cereal, but then again bringing a unique message (in ads) is probably doing more for their brand recognition than shiity 10 second commercials. The cynical part of me is wondering how long it's going to take before this gets called mysognist though - "look at the wife, she's completely disregarded!"
/r/MensRights15/08/14 11:46 PM
3

Well the judge wouldn't be able too, youtube bans all porn.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 05:03 AM
2

links are fine, you just need to add np.reddit, it marks "no participation" and disallows voting/commenting.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 10:00 PM
3

Nothing unusual. You disagree, so you must be a rapist which means you're a horrible person which means you're wrong. It's circular logic, don't bother with reality as this person isn't interested.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 10:04 AM
5

I'm not so sure about that. Look at some fashion models and their anorexia; the built in view of health/attractiveness is DEFINITELY wrong there. Attractiveness sways with culture as well... Overall it would be kind of nice if there was an objective way of measuring attractiveness, but it's just not really possible.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/14 03:29 PM
17

Technically, they are fine. BMI is a scale to indicate health after all, not how attractive they are. The rest is just their own opinion, which obviously can be wrong. :p
/r/TheRedPill11/08/14 02:27 PM
2

Woman can't handle parenting, wastes police time expecting them to fulfil her responsibility for her. Seriously, why is there no mention of her being fined? No law was broken, nor was there reasonable suspicion of such.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 02:22 PM
1

Imagine if you had a job with no alternative that would ruin your life if you lost it. Your boss approaches you, sexually. You can't go anywhere that you know of, you have no idea who could help you or how much trouble it would get you in. Your boss is lying to you about things to try and make you stay close, but you don't realize it - all the while, the threat of losing that job is hanging around. Yeah, i'm sure you would consent in that situation. You're not being coerced or forced to at all. …
/r/MensRights10/08/14 06:32 PM
1

men and women can both be underhanded, i agree. Falling back on something like word definitions and terms to try and say one sex does it more/equal is silly though, as it doesn't say anything. "Poison is a woman's weapon" could be said to counter your point, for example, since it's a group (women) instead of one person. Neither of the two uses of words really says anything about reality.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 06:08 PM
7

And as you can see, many people have openly pointed out OP is a bit of a dick for the wording. I think the same but don't see any reason to type it out when it's already been said twice in the top comments. Simply seeing a woman punished as she should be for her crimes is news. It gives a bit of hope that this new law won't be sexist, which is great news. That's why it's posted in this subreddit, even if with poor wording.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 12:56 PM
2

While it is indeed silly to have multiple laws on the same thing, having a layer of laws that works/is enforced on top of one that isn't is still preferred to domestic violence going unpunished.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 12:30 PM
6

So... after a single woman ends up in the news for being the first to be incarcerated for domestic abuse under a new set of laws, you declare women to not get preferential treatment. If a sample set of 1 is considered enough for radical feminists (as you say you are) to consider it evidence, i can understand why some feminist statistics are so terribly one-sided and out of touch with reality.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 12:26 PM
1

Landing page here, "why match.com" and tons of "register for free" buttons.
/r/TheRedPill04/08/14 03:53 PM
3

Seems fair enough. Asking someone to have cybersex with you in an online game popular with children, on a public server. Um yeah, server owner is fully within their right to ban a player from their property (server). A lot of servers tend to have rules in place about respect to other people, just because it's sexual doesn't mean those don't count. EDIT: this is true of all online games with private servers, btw. If anyone wants a 18+ minecraft experience they are free to set up their own server.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 01:20 PM
2

Feminists won't be calling for legislation like that, in countries where thats not happening. I'm sorry, but if you look at the current state of things (duluth model for domestic violence, college rape tribunals) feminists will call for anything they can get a benefit from. Sadly, they are likely to get it eventually as well. Actual harassment is an issue. Being looked at in public is not, yet feminist bloggers seem to deem it harassment (or in the case of tumblr, even rape). New laws to punish …
/r/MensRights17/07/14 07:18 AM
-2

So... Now stabbing/cutting food in front of the person you live with is a crime, as long as you're male. Do we have to start asking the nearest woman if it's ok to handle our own food? Seriously, this is ridicilous. If she feels threatened, handle it as a threat. Calling domestic violence WITHOUT VIOLENCE is simply a way for the woman to punish the man for whatever wrong she feels he did - likely a disagreement/argument.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 05:55 AM
4

It took me a while to find this out myself as well: "hamstering" is a term used when a person is disregarding reality and creating their own thing, usually to make things better to themselves than they really are, or shift a blame. It stems from a cartoon of someone's lack of critical thinking: a hamster spinning a wheel in someones head. It's usually very emotionally loaded and while it's usually directed at women on this subreddit, it's human behaviour and affects everyone to some degree. How …
/r/TheRedPill06/07/14 02:02 AM
9

It's nothing about alpha at this point, it's self-preservation. She willfully damaged his body in his sleep. At this point, who's to say she won't stab him in his sleep after a heated argument?
/r/TheRedPill03/07/14 09:17 PM
33

So... "his body, her choice"? I don't personally agree with the status of long hair as a fan of metal (you dress however you like), but she literally did a semi-permanent change to HIS body, while he explicitly didn't want it. I don't think this is any different from assault. After all, "the hair will grow back" could be regarded as equal to "these undeep cut wounds will heal" - you simply don't go about damaging another person's body, even if the damage is non-permanent. He definitely needs to …
/r/TheRedPill03/07/14 09:11 PM
1

Migraine is different for everyone. I don't have any help from avoiding light or sounds; they don't do much for me. However, i do have visua lauras that leave me pretty much blind. Vomiting helps partially (at that point the auras go away) but usually takes a few hours. I've been prescribed sumatriptan by a neurologist, which helps alleviate some of the pain. Of course, due to the vomiting i need to take it as soon as i notice the first signs or it won't do a thing. Those pills are expensive tho…
/r/MensRights03/07/14 04:45 PM
1

I've wondered about this before; is giving consent by signed 'contract' actively being used? It certainly seems inconvenient, and if there's a false accusation it doesnt help. Example: signed contract shows consent for sex last night, 25/6. What's stopping a woman to report rape on the 27th? If she's already lying, i don't think a contract will matter,simply due to a woman's word being taken as truth.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 06:07 AM
1

This is a subreddit for discussion, not your private ranting board.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/14 06:38 AM
3

I don't think there's any way to prove or disprove either side. You can try digging further with specific questions and hope to find some inconsistency in their side, but that's no proof of lying.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 10:07 AM
16

It's a counter to feminists claiming male circumcision is completely safe, though. That's kind of the point being raised here: it's unnecessary AND potentially dangerous.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 10:51 AM
1

In job and in hiring: i recall a recent story where a guy worked late shifts as his normal hours but was set to earlier ones on days that merchandise arrived, leaving him with a far heavier task than the other employees (all female) for no extra pay. This is sexism, but finding out how/where to file discrimination complaints is difficult even though simply knowing it IS possible gives the person ammo to discuss extra wage or change of shift. Methods on dealing with white knighting; things to avo…
/r/MensRights19/06/14 06:17 AM
2

It's a bot. It copies people's posts because there have previously been issues with trying to falsely make this subreddit look bad - making a post, getting people to say "i agree" to it, then changing the post to something like "all women are bitches and belong in the kitchen". In other words ;don't worry about the bot. Nobody's going to bother looking at it if all you've edited is a few typos. :P
/r/MensRights18/06/14 05:29 PM
2

Perhaps some links with suggestions for behaviour on handling discrimination might be useful. A category with help in identifying and ways of reporting it might be helpful too.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 04:59 PM
4

A healthy part of the male body is removed for religious reason, with the child not having a choice yet having to deal with the consequences. The operation is not without risk and, when succesful, leads to vastly decreased sensitivity that can harm a man's sex life greatly. In other words; the big deal is with needless mutilation of one's body before the body's "owner" even has a say. When it comes down to it, male and female genital mutilation are the exact same in this and should only ever be …
/r/MensRights17/06/14 11:02 AM
2

I think that's a wrong way to look at it - i have no idea where you live and what you mean by subsidizing birth control. If you mean via health care, it is fairky normal as that encompasses all necessary/common need, including birth control as it is a medicine. That kind of system is equal though; if you end up with medical needs you get financial support as well. There is no 'birth control tax' being laid on men and compared to other medical costs the price is most likely negligible. Edit: obvi…
/r/MensRights17/06/14 10:54 AM
-3

Attacking another person is a crime, not justice.
/r/PussyPass15/06/14 05:40 PM
-2

Yes, i did. As i said, she was harrassing and insulting people. Verbal harrasment does not mean you have to resort to violence. The proper reaction would have been for the owner of the shop to kick her out for harrassing customers, calling the police if she refused. We live in a civilized society, not "might makes right". If she had attacked anyone they would have been in full right to defend themselves, but all she did was make a lot of noise and act big. Being annoyed does not mean you're allo…
/r/PussyPass15/06/14 04:42 PM
-4

Why?
/r/PussyPass15/06/14 03:11 PM
-14

While she was harrassing people and being disruptive/insulting to people around her, the answer should not be violence. She did not deserve to be attacked - rather she deserved to be kicked the hell out, cops called if necessary.
/r/PussyPass15/06/14 02:42 PM
1

The sex here is consensual. That's all you need to know. A minor can not legally consent to sex with an adult. So, regardless of the adult being male or female, they commited a crime and harmed another person. Being male or female should have nothing to do with it, thus the punishment has to be the same.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 02:35 PM
27

innocent until proven guilty. That is the basis of all western law (or, well... should be. Current state is a bit debatable in areas). If you take an allegation as fact, you turn it into "guilty until proven innocent" instead. An allegation is taken as an allegation, both sides have to be heard to find out what actually happened and if crime was commited. What they seem to be complaining about is that an allegation does not simply mean the "offender" is immediately punished, but they turned it i…
/r/MensRights15/06/14 02:31 PM
37

If she's really attending to throw a fit, she'll just make things up anyway - "i was harrassed as i walked around" "men touched me inappropriately and pulled me towards them". There is no disproving without consistently monitoring her with a camera the entire time she's there, which is unreasonable to do on anyone. She can return and cry out bad things to those that will believe her no matter what.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 01:41 PM
70

She's playing a drama scene, screaming and yelling bloody murder. Meanwhile, she is simply being held. Big props for the man to stay calm during the situation and even explain to the public what's going on.
/r/PussyPass14/06/14 02:35 PM
2

I don't think this has anything to do with men's rights. Nurse/doctor didn't do their job properly and misdiagnosed - this does happen, but has nothing to do regarding gender. The article isn't shaming him or such either, just reporting.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 09:42 PM
22

"Non-conforming behaviour". Doesn't sound totalitarian at all.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 11:07 AM
2

Police need a legal reason to step into private property and such, which requires something illegal about to happen.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 11:04 AM
2

I believe it IS illegal in all western countries. Police isn't allowed to intervene in private property unless given permission to enter or there is clear illegal activity. Essentially it's to stop attempted suicides turning into officers being punished for saving a life.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 11:02 AM
2

I suggest doing some research. I lurk in both subreddits (and feminism) - there's only one of those three that accepts patriarchy as an actual thing. They 'pander to feminists'... What, by rejecting them and trying to expose the negatives of the movement? You do not seem to know at all what the men's rights movement is. Wether you support MR or not is a choice, but if you're making choices based on false information, you're doing it wrong.
/r/TheRedPill06/06/14 08:19 AM
1

That last quote/comment is really out of line. This specific woman is like this, doesn't mean all women are. Same goes for men - generalization in society has caused this young boy to be considered having consented, "he wanted it".
/r/MensRights06/06/14 06:39 AM
2

Don't. Use case by case judgement, not automatically assuming. That's how things work now, how can doing more of it in the opposite direction cause anything good?
/r/MensRights06/06/14 06:27 AM
1

I would assume IM rather than text message.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/14 11:01 AM
2

Bashing is unnecessary. However, unless MRAs suddenly promote feminism itll continue to be a point they get put in a bad light over. People in this sub criticize feminism, and the media spins it to "feminism = women". The media lives off of spreading news, the more sensation about it the better. There's nothing to do about that - unless someone sets up a PR agency for MRAs, which is unrealistic. All in all, i'd say behave as you normally do. This is the internet, there will be people trolling, b…
/r/MensRights28/05/14 01:24 PM
5

because the women do not want to see men around. This means the people who say that require mental help. They can't be kept apart from half of human population just because of past events with one specific person. If someone is nearly murdered by someone who happens to be black (which is much worse than domestic violence), do they get to go to a hospital that only accepts white people? Oh, wait, people are different and you can't judge them based on someone else simply because they share one fea…
/r/MensRights25/05/14 05:27 PM
3

If its any critical question you'll still get banned. It is not a subreddit for those who wish to discuss things with their own opinion if that opinion doesn't fit the mod's ideas. I was banned for daring to speak up against the generalization that all mra's hate women, that the person should take a better look and treat the other as a person. Banhammer, because a neutral vision is not welcome.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 02:00 PM
8

So when men become women, they have a choice on wether they become a parent. Compate it with apartheid, "they do have the same rights"... If they were white.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 06:31 AM
1

Thanks for pointing this out, i'm mobile and would have had no idea if not for these two comments.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 05:57 AM
1

Violence is not the answer to social problems, especially not attempted murder / mutilation.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/14 11:28 PM
1

And that would be your issue; this is a subreddit for sharing information, discussion etc. Importing your site onto public space is a bad idea, since it essentially hijacks this subreddit to promote your site. Try to make a regular post (button on the right as you browse) and type up a list instead of posting this many links as separate posts. You can create a larger post raising specific points with links to your articles.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 07:47 AM
1

Um, is it even allowed to post links to your own site en masse? I don't mean that this site is worthless or untrue, but i've not heard of it before and u/mensrightsmelbourne appears to be posting a high volume articles without posting text and with attention-attracting titles. That just smells a bit fishy to me, personally.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 06:41 AM
1

I wear underwear, always. Sorry if it came off as claiming you do one way or the other - I meant it in a general way, as choosing the lesser evil. As for the lines being noticeable to men, i can't honestly tell. I'm still relatively new here, mostly analysing my current/past behaviour and discussions here - as such, i'm not exactly going out much (yet?). It is a personal matter, though - some men don't notice finer details like that, and those that notice might see it as unattractive or the exac…
/r/TheRedPill10/04/14 08:31 PM
2

Doesnt wearing no underwear make you feel unsafe, too? Anyone can imagine you naked or in underwear regardless of clothing, it's imagination after all. Removing clothing to feel more covered seems backward to me.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/14 06:54 AM
1

A shit test is claiming/acting a way specifically to push for an emotional response, when said response that was asked for would only result negatively. I don't see any guys claiming they want a slutty girl while they're really looking for a kind woman for a long term relationship, or breaking up with women for not ignoring what they ask for. Shit tests are only in one of the two sexes, so no men don't shit test. That said, asking or saying things meant but in a specific way can be and are used …
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 01:32 PM
6

Plenty of today's celebrities would like to disagree with that - a woman cheating on a rich man she no longer likes has nothing to lose and a lot of money to gain from a divorce.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/14 05:42 AM
2

Facts or bust. Don't try and raise an issue without any proof, that kind of thing is already rampant in society and is a big reason this subreddit even exists/is needed. Especially considering your actual claim is only four sentences. (edit: and the title.)
/r/TheRedPill04/04/14 08:48 PM
2

Yeah, i've noticed the strong vibes there and decided to limit actual interactions. Maybe i've been lucky so far, but either way i created this account JUST to look into gender politics without using my 'normal' account. To me, i guess it wouldn't matter too much if i did get banned as i can just make a new account and continue viewing. :)
/r/TheRedPill31/03/14 10:58 PM
2

Depends, depends... Military is much more than just strength these days: more than just running with rifles. Tanks, aircraft, etc. need both pilots and technicians. People with good technical skills need to be available to defuse mines and IED's. And then there's drones piloted from far away. Don't judge all women in the military on just their strength, because nowadays that's just silly. A guy ripped as hell would be SOL in the front lines without proper equipment and support.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/14 10:33 PM
13

I wonder what people consider my account - i'm subbed to feminism, men's rights, askfeminism, femradebates and a few more. With any luck they'll consider me a nutcase :)
/r/TheRedPill31/03/14 10:22 PM
0

From heavy_metta's post, which i originally replied to (and which he elaborated on in a reply): I guess because "medical" circumcision of children is practically non existent in most if not all European countries. Others are trying to ban it outright for children under a certain age. I replied to these two specific points, stating myself as an example of why the latter would be a bad idea as well. Hence, you claiming "nobody is talking about" voluntary/therapeutic surgery is false. I'm well awar…
/r/MensRights23/03/14 08:01 PM
0

Yes, and my comment was in reply to the distinction, pointing out the need to allow therapeutic surgery. Hence, your point doesn't really have anything to do with what i was saying.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 06:55 PM
-1

You may want to read the context. Koggy0608 asked why "ritual" circumcision in particular, then heavy_metta said the necessary kind is non existant. So the discussion in this particular comment thread was most certainly about voluntary, therapeutic procedures and its distinction from the ritual kind.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 12:33 PM
11

It does exist, it's just not that common. I am personally curcimsized because of a medical reason at a very young age, causing me to be unable to pee. My father, at a much older age, has had to be circumcized as a complication of diabetes. Basically, if all circumcision were banned both of us would be either dead or pissing through a tube with large risk of infection, with massive pain the rest of our lives... I would also be unable to have sex. Making the distinction is most certainly not a lux…
/r/MensRights22/03/14 07:34 PM
1

A bit offtopic, but i as a European (Belgian actually, hence i had to comment in here, it's something related to me personally :P) would likewise like to question us "freedom" in response. The US provides individuals and corporations the right to treat others unfairly, harming another person is essentially completely legal which i just can't understand. Examples of these are "right to work", gun laws, jobs without or with a horrible skewed contract, etc. I'm not saying our laws are perfect (i do…
/r/MensRights22/03/14 01:19 PM
1

Living in Belgium, i've never heard this terminology but i can certainly see where it comes from. Here, laws are made to serve society as a whole, to protect everyone. If it succeeds in that, it would be called positive. This is not to say individuals don't have rights, but this tends to come second to protecting everyone.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 01:02 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter