ToxicPolarBear Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	He literally ended her Worshipping women doesn’t mean you’re not treating them like property my guy	/r/PussyPassDenied	30/09/20 04:14 PM
1	He literally ended her Is it an issue that the <1% is all males? yes, absolutely. But its still important to acknowledge that 99% of all males are disaffected. That's great, but what these people and everyone in this comment is doing is not this, it's saying "males are also disaffected, so the first part of that statement is irrelevant" and ignoring or shouting over all the women saying "no, it's really not". I'm not getting upset nor have any of my responses been hostile, simply pointing out the lack of self awarenes…	/r/PussyPassDenied	29/09/20 04:10 PM
2	He literally ended her Caring about women's issues doesn't mean ignoring men's issues, nor has it ever meant that. Stop thinking this.	/r/PussyPassDenied	29/09/20 06:03 AM
0	He literally ended her Out of the people who're driven/passionate/hardworking/exclusively focused/unagreeable/restless/confident, and are willing to follow that dream no matter the hardship, sacrifice time out/relationships/friends/hobbies, it just so happens that men fill that criteria at a higher ratio than women. Yeah, so the fact that you and other people unironically believe this and use it as reasoning to deny women the same job opportunities you give to men of similar qualifications, is the problem. The idea th…	/r/PussyPassDenied	29/09/20 05:26 AM
0	He literally ended her The comment explicitly says "peasant men" dude. And the entire point of that comment misses the point of what every feminist is saying spectacularly. Of course every man isn't in power or well off, but the fact that no women are means that men and women are afforded different opportunities in life as a consequence of their birth, and for the majority of history this meant following the rules set by almost entirely male rulers who didn't give a shit about women.	/r/PussyPassDenied	29/09/20 04:27 AM
-4	He literally ended her Cleopatra Chinese culture ???? Are you lost?	/r/PussyPassDenied	29/09/20 01:32 AM
-6	He literally ended her Says "crack open a history book" while referencing shit like "if momma ain't happy; nobody's happy" LMFAO I'm fucking doubling over my dude. Women and children being protected is because they were valued as property to start a new generation of society, it had nothing to do with their value as people. Their opinions were irrelevant, they did not hold positions of authority, and they did not have the power to defend themselves so the men had to protect them. They absolutely did not get the food f…	/r/PussyPassDenied	29/09/20 01:26 AM
-42	He literally ended her I like how you're still not catching on to the lack of agency of the women in any of those scenarios, and making allusions to extremely exceptional cases like royalty or Cleopatra LOL. It's not about women being victims, it's about them not being afforded the agency that is given to men. You can still fight for the rights of men and posit that they have been abused by societal structures that decide to give men more power and responsibility than women, but denying the way women have been treated…	/r/PussyPassDenied	29/09/20 12:49 AM
-52	He literally ended her Royal women were literally treated like property and it was jealous men who mandated that men who tended to them be eunuchs, not the women. I don't think you have a very realistic idea of the roles that women have historically had in society. Not to mention the royal women leading better lives than peasant men does not account for the peasant women, nor the status of women being subordinate to men as a whole.	/r/PussyPassDenied	29/09/20 12:39 AM
-59	He literally ended her I like how nowhere in your analogy did you mention at all the fate of the women, as if it some comeback to the woman's point that women are sidelined or neglected in society.	/r/PussyPassDenied	29/09/20 12:16 AM
4	Very creative Wow you're totally right, I'm sure the ad totally wasn't portraying a classic case in which the divorcee wife gets half of the husband's belongings, they were just leaving it up to the audience. Not like there's a glaringly obvious precedent for this kind of scenario that you're intentionally feigning ignorance of or anything.	/r/PussyPassDenied	24/08/20 11:43 PM
6	Very creative It's fake Pretty sure the point is to draw attention to the fact that something he bought with his own money not legally belonging to him is fucked up.	/r/PussyPassDenied	24/08/20 11:21 PM
5	Very creative Yeah wanting equity in ownership definitely makes you an incel LMAO	/r/PussyPassDenied	24/08/20 11:14 PM