TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Trahas Archive

View 0 posts and 111 comments by Trahas on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Like I said noshavenovember is full beard, movember is less known and was just a mustache.
/r/MensRights15/11/13 12:11 AM
3

There is noshavenovember which is just for fun beard growing, but then before that there was and still is movember which is where you grow a mustache for prostate cancer awareness and there are groups that raise money for prostate cancer research.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 09:00 PM
2

On my phone so the short answer is when France took over parts of England they brought Latin into the higher courts. Whereas the lower class people still spoke 'crude' english. Look up evolution of curse words in english. It really is interesting.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 04:03 PM
2

Cup size for Australia. I think you have to be a C cup or up.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 02:57 PM
3

Since it is in Austria it could have been a mistranslation and they meant child support.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 07:04 AM
5

When you turn 18 you have to sign your name to a card that says in the future if the government wants you, they can draft you into a war. It has not been used for decades but it is still there and something only males have to do. If you do not sign the card I would have to check but there are consequences which I thought one being thrown in jail, but I could be wrong about that.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 06:11 PM
2

Wheat is a grain not a vegetable.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 04:21 AM
9

Honestly I was going to leave your post alone, but since you are bracing for downvotes I feel obliged to do it now.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 09:08 PM
8

Doesn't matter, the man is the rapist because he has the penis meaning he always gives consent. /s The sad thing is I have heard this before, especially with drunk sex. "Well obviously the one performing the action would be the rapist and so it would be the man because he is the one penetrating"
/r/MensRights27/08/12 06:07 AM
3

I believe per year of prison, but have no sources to back that up sorry :(
/r/MensRights25/08/12 05:02 PM
2

If you put the two together at the same time yes, but that is why there is that or in there.
/r/MensRights18/08/12 03:21 PM
1

I believe what he meant is that they would rather die than have sex which in his scenario they view all sex as rape. So to answer your question no he doesn't, at least I hope he doesn't.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 01:19 AM
1

Sadly true
/r/MensRights15/08/12 03:05 AM
6

When ever it happens to a man, or male student from a female teacher. Then you hear the I wish it was me posts.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 08:05 AM
0

Because not everyone is innocent and so where the evidence comes from does matter. And no i am not being the anal clerk that won't sell you smokes. That is a pretty big over simplification. As for proving your innocence I would agree with you on that it is up to prosecution to prove your guilty.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 04:57 PM
0

Problem is it is not 'proven false accusations' in the eyes of the court. I also don't like the evidence gathered by any means, since torture could be used to get false evidence.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 01:48 AM
5

But we are ok with forcing someone to work or go to prison for 18 years for their child. Honestly it surprises me when someone who is pro-choice wouldn't also be pro-LPS considering it uses almost the same arguments.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 03:30 PM
1

Not if people made the choice not to make such jokes in the rest of reddit. This is very true and I'm not saying it will never happen, but it probably will never happen, Reddit is too big with too many individuals to try and censor anyone. Of course I can, and I will. We as a society acknowledge when something is very common. We vaccinate for things that are more common, and don't for things that are very unlikely. We vaccinate for things that are now very uncommon, but we still do it because th…
/r/MensRights13/07/12 12:58 PM
1

But you don't know what might be a trigger for something, sure you can say rape is a more common trigger, but you honestly don't know if cats is a huge trigger for a person and would really set them off. What you consider awful and what the person next to you considers awful can be two very different things. So I still stand by my sentiment, either you are allowed to joke about everything or nothing. Also if you are on the internet especially reddit, you should probably expect some kind of rape …
/r/MensRights13/07/12 03:17 AM
2

But where do you draw the line then? If you can't joke about everything then you can't joke about anything because someone somewhere is going to be offended by what you say. And if someone is worried they will be triggered from a joke then they can normally remove themselves from the situation where those jokes will come up. If I didn't like cat jokes because a cat brutally mauled me as a child and I had friends who constantly made them I would just stop hanging out with them.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 03:04 AM
3

It was a letter to the editor so don't expect too much.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 10:35 PM
4

I actually thought this growing up that the girls were just smarter then the boys, but the boys were better at sports. Made me sad though because I was bad at sports and I thought I wouldn't be smart because the girls were the smart ones.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 08:38 PM
1

This is for the US though if I recall correctly. I don't know what it is for UK.
/r/MensRights26/06/12 12:28 AM
5

For every 100 females raped there are 100 males raped. CDC Source
/r/MensRights19/06/12 01:29 PM
2

According to the CDC Source Men and women are now getting raped equally, but when spreading numbers they like to continue spreading historical data which is not accurate of the present. It would be like saying X number of people in America will own Slaves in their lifetime because they went all the way back to before the civil war to get their numbers. Maybe not that drastic but I hope you see my point.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 01:28 PM
2

Clicked ready to be depressed with another depressing story, but was wonderfully surprised, thank you for sharing.
/r/MensRights16/06/12 12:00 AM
1

Oh yes not arguing your point just your example.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 10:25 PM
3

Catholics can and do believe in evolution, would be better to say argue about Jesus, God, or the bible.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 03:40 AM
1

Never said it was, but the first piece lawyer up is always good to do, hitting the gym gives him something to do with spare time to occupy his mind, and deleting facebook is just silly but still advice people give. I get the personal self image part but just wondering where you got monetary possessions from?
/r/MensRights05/06/12 10:25 PM
2

always do the 3 basics of reddit in these situations, Lawyer up Hit the gym Delete Facebook. In all seriousness though really get a lawyer and good luck getting your daughter back. Best of luck to you.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 03:21 AM
20

Because there is an assumption that if you are drunk it is automatically rape because you cannot give consent while drunk. Meaning every time you have sex while drunk it is rape. Which is silly because if two drunk people had sex with each other would they be raping each other? If someone was passed out drunk though, or drunk and saying no and someone forced sex on them then yes that is still rape even though they are drunk. Being drunk should not mean, never consent, as much as it does always c…
/r/MensRights20/05/12 03:38 PM
1

I will agree with that though too, the punishment should fit the crime, but we must not forget he did commit a crime here.
/r/MensRights14/05/12 03:17 AM
1

Lol it happens, yeah without that wouldn't it sounded like you were in favor of child pornography
/r/MensRights13/05/12 06:19 AM
5

Part of his conviction was that he passed it along meaning he was supplying child pornography. As for the making of it I don't know, maybe she claimed she didn't know he was taping or something, didn't really say.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 05:14 AM
1

want or wouldn't want?
/r/MensRights13/05/12 05:12 AM
5

Actually yes all those people who are sexting under 18 are committing crimes, and yes because they are both under 18 it is illegal to film it. The thing is once you take a picture or video and send it to someone else you are passing along child pornography and you don't know where it could end up. Just because you are under 18 also doesn't mean you can look at child pornography either.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 04:19 AM
2

Ok thank you very much.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 04:21 PM
0

You could be right. I feel like the article was kind of unclear about that but maybe I am just reading it wrong.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 03:32 PM
6

To me it sounded like she went to the cops first then told her boyfriend, I could be wrong though.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 02:48 PM
3

Ok well thank you for your time. It is interesting to see another side of this story.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 07:13 PM
7

I am guessing you did this on WoW or something similar, did anyone not let you do something because they thought you were a woman? like lead a raid or anything of the sort?
/r/MensRights10/05/12 06:39 PM
7

I've heard some women hate that treatment though because they feel like they are being patronized and they think others think they cannot do anything for themselves did you get that feeling?
/r/MensRights10/05/12 06:22 PM
4

Ah I missed the gear part and thought he meant like in online dating.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 06:21 PM
6

3) every person everywhere is a super tryhard and could never just enjoy a sport with people and don't mind to meet someone new and have fun with them.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 06:11 PM
9

Guys try being women online Do you have an article where someone did that or are you just assuming that is how it would go?
/r/MensRights10/05/12 06:07 PM
1

Hmmm, that is interesting, but projecting is not historical fact so we will have to see what happens.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 12:15 AM
1

That is exactly what I was wanting thank you, not quite 2:3 but it is close, yet it is on a path back to 1:1
/r/MensRights08/05/12 11:05 PM
2

Yeah I see a trend with that, but once again no 2:3 ratio. This just bothers me because I hate when people spouted incorrect or outdated rape statistics and so I don't want to be a hypocrite and start spouting wrong college statistics. And don't worry about the derp, I've done that before myself.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 04:49 AM
2

Thank you, but like you said not 2:3 and from 2005 so I wouldn't quote it for a standard that holds true today. Nevertheless thank you for finding it and trying to answer my question.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 04:26 AM
1

What list? Found that list you posted. Did you do a sneak edit? It also said at the bottom. UK average 51:49 So I am not seeing this 2:3. There is good number being 40:60 but no where near the majority and infact 50:50 has more numbers, 50:50(12) 40:60(10).
/r/MensRights08/05/12 04:24 AM
2

I don't want to sound skeptical but can you link to that 3 women for every 2 men? I want to quote that to people, but would like to back it up.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 03:48 AM
1

So men suffer more psychological aggression than women. .4% is close enough to not justify saying one suffers more then the other, especially since it is a sample sized survey. If it was the other way around and someone came in spouting women has it worse because .4%, many here would, (I would say correctly) correct them saying that .4% is not enough of a deviation. So an almost equal number of Sexual Assaults. Point in case above .4% (which if you take the .4% and divide by the average(48.6%) i…
/r/MensRights05/05/12 07:18 AM
1

I can't at the moment because I am tired and going to bed soon, but if you go to the linked page you could make it yourself its on pages 18 and 19, I should have saved it without the circles first but I did not, sadly. If you are still too lazy PM me and I will try and get to it in the next few days.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 07:06 AM
1

You should also look at, and I didn't include it in this graphic, just because I wanted a simple point, that ~60% of rapists are male and ~40% of rapists are female, so even though it is even on who is getting raped, there is still a slight gap on who is raping and people advocating the "Men can stop rape" campaigns will probably still point that out.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 07:05 AM
2

Ok well you are consistent so I will give you that. Thank you for your honest reply and I will think about what you said tonight. I am sorry to say at the moment I don't have any kind of counter argument to give and I don't believe in making rash decisions or judgements so I will let you be. Also have a wonderful day.
/r/MensRights04/05/12 04:31 AM
3

You can most definitely still be aroused while unconscious.
/r/MensRights04/05/12 04:04 AM
6

So are you saying the people who say that 1 in 6, 1 in 5, and 1 in 4 women will be raped in their lifetime shouldn't because those stats were probably 'made up'?
/r/MensRights04/05/12 04:00 AM
3

So if you looked in the 12 month numbers 1,267,000 men were 'forced to penetrate' and 1,270,000 women were 'raped'. Who is forcing who to penetrate whom? Who is raping whom? Men can be forced to penetrate other men or women it lumps them together. Women are raped, once again they can be raped by women or men it lumps them together.
/r/MensRights04/05/12 03:58 AM
3

Good, leave it that way, you are much better off.
/r/MensRights04/05/12 03:52 AM
2

I would hope so, but they could also fix it.
/r/MensRights04/05/12 03:51 AM
2

I very well think they are not. I think it is supposed to be the general populous but would need to find exact wording to support it. So no prisoners would not count.
/r/MensRights04/05/12 03:50 AM
2

Yep, and thank you for pointing it out, I'm glad you took the time you look it over at least semi critically, and didn't just believe me purely on my word alone, because that is the sort of behavior that bothers with me with people who spread these falls percentages on rape.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 11:45 PM
2

Well then thank you for the compliment and spread it around as much as you like. I did look at your comment history and I don't doubt you, just been dealing with a lot of stupid people last few days so I am a little on edge.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 11:42 PM
1

Yeah sorry, didn't mean to yell at you, I just keep seeing posts and not just in here about oh I wonder when SRS will show up. The more we talk about them the more reason we give to them to stay around.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 11:32 PM
1

No the ~ 1 million number is for last 12 months
/r/MensRights03/05/12 11:30 PM
8

Yep.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 11:28 PM
3

Do we always have to bring up SRS? especially in that context it sounds like we are at odds with each other and this is the biggie, equivalent to each other. I always thought while MRA's have their trolls too, that we were more opening and welcoming of other people and ideas as long as it promoted growth. Not in a constant flame war with a shitty troll subreddit.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 11:26 PM
1

I don't know if you are trolling me or being sincere, sooo.... Thank you and Fuck off?
/r/MensRights03/05/12 11:23 PM
4

yes because 2011 data isn't ready yet. Once it is we will get an updated view on the matter and we can compare the two years.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 11:23 PM
1

Yeah I regret making that circle now, but at the time I did not see that the forced to penetrate also included attempts. I looked to see if it said it anywhere, but looked in the wrong place.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 11:20 PM
5

They are.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 11:07 PM
4

Yeah I tried reading it but gave up know I was going to get a censored version.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 11:04 PM
2

Yes I realized this later, but the Rape figure also includes these so the 1.1 to 1.1 ratio is still correct.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 10:58 PM
10

And that is one of the problems with these reports. Yes the information is there but it is not presented in the best way to most correctly represent the facts. And so people go around spreading false information and "common knowledge" just becomes wrong.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 10:57 PM
11

First off I was pointing out in the last 12 months part. Because as a society yes looking in the past is good to learn from, but to measure how we are advancing we can't keep looking at the past, but need to be looking at the now and future. So if you looked in the 12 month numbers 1,267,000 men were 'forced to penetrate' and 1,270,000 women were 'raped'. I put those in '' because the point I am making and so many other make is that they should both read, rape. Forced to penetrate being put into…
/r/MensRights03/05/12 10:49 PM
5

But that is silly, plus we could compare the numbers too, 1,267,000 men were forced to penetrate and 1,270,000 women were force penetrated. In the last 12 months. So about 3000 off from each other. Comparing percentages is most definitely not meaningless, and can actually have more meaning then raw numbers.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 10:37 PM
2

I was wondering the same thing.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 10:32 PM
2

1 million out of 300 million people though. Yes these numbers seem high, but that's why we look at percents.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 10:05 PM
5

last 12 months of this survey, it would be silly to assume they already have everything from 2011 ready to be posted, even though it is already May. This is the most current CDC report that I know of
/r/MensRights03/05/12 10:04 PM
3

Not at all, the point I did this was so people would use it in other conversations.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 10:02 PM
1

In what way?
/r/MensRights03/05/12 09:30 PM
5

I think he means that while we don't agree with the definition, it was defined. They didn't just use the word rape without giving any definition to it.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 09:30 PM
8

I did thank you. I thought about posting these over to 2X to see their views on it, but I don't know if I am up for the amount of flaming I will probably receive, if I get any sort of acknowledgement at all.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 09:29 PM
11

Yes I found that out after I made the images and posted it. And yes, very fucked up that they do not call that rape.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 09:14 PM
7

I thought the report provided a lot of information and defined things explicitly enough to allow readers to come to their own conclusions.(sic) Yes it does, and no it doesn't. Yes it does in that it does define it, but that definition is outdated, at least according to almost every person I have asked, not a big enough study I know but still. No it doesn't because it highlights certain pieces of information, majority of people won't read the whole report, and even fewer will read all of it. (Eve…
/r/MensRights03/05/12 09:10 PM
2

Ok thank you, I missed that wording. Then yes using the total 1.1 for women raped and attempted together would be the correct, or at least most correct, comparison.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 08:51 PM
7

I hate doing this but, Victim to the rape culture /s But seriously, I do think attempted rape is serious and should not be taken lightly. But at the same time should not just be lumped in with rape.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 08:49 PM
14

Gotta love the stars under Male Rape as if it doesn't exist. It's like a scientist with fingers in his ears going NOPE NOPE NOPE NOPE The number of times I saw this in the report scared me, but I understand why they did it, which is they only counted men who were penetrated and that is not common enough apparently. I am still just mystified on how so many reports still use what I feel like is a barbaric term for rape. I almost feel like doing a survey to find out what the general populous thinks…
/r/MensRights03/05/12 08:47 PM
10

No I understood what you meant, just thought I would share google's view on the matter. Did you even click the link? it is almost agreeing with your original statement. Also bring discussion to the table not just sarcasm.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 08:09 PM
22

Google's view on rape
/r/MensRights03/05/12 08:03 PM
9

I went back through, quickly, but still and did not see "attempted coercion to penetrate." could you screen cap, or post a page number where you saw that? As far as I can tell though it means being forced to penetrate, not attempted to being forced to penetrate.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 07:48 PM
3

Oh yes I understand what you are trying to say, and the, at least for me, awful thing about language, is that I can't always find the correct words to use. Sometimes they don't exist, other times people have different meanings for them. So all I was trying to say was that 1) It is still awful that they were attempted raped.(is that even the right way to say that? 2) We should still care about them. And the best way I could think of was as a victim. I just get very angry when people try to manipu…
/r/MensRights03/05/12 07:28 PM
3

Yes I would agree to that, and why I circled the actual and "total" as well.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 07:19 PM
9

I am not saying that and sorry my post came across this way. But would you not agree that someone who was shot in an attempted murder would still have some sort of trauma of the fact, and in someway would still be a victim. Not a Murder victim, because there was no murder, but still a victim.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 07:09 PM
7

Yeah, but I am fickle on that one. What would you call someone who was attempted murdered? I don't know if you can call them a murder victim, but I would still feel like they are a victim, just a lucky one. It's probably not as traumatic, but could still have an effect.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 07:04 PM
63

Here is a link to the actual report. Because of the hype with the women raping men post recently I figured I would share a finding. Also note what they consider rape and what they choose to highlight in the report.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 06:47 PM
3

The point was that they said we should not blame women, and instead put blame on men. If this happened to a single father would people be saying the same thing?
/r/MensRights27/04/12 10:54 PM
60

By not consenting to sex and then forced to have sex.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 10:21 PM
3

If you want to help out the Goblins comic creator then go here and vote for him to win the contest that brought the lady who bashed his comic to begin with. http://www.comicmix.com/news/2012/04/06/mix-march-madness-2012-webcomics-tournament-finals-gunnerkrigg-court-vs-goblins/
/r/MensRights08/04/12 05:54 AM
1

Unique DNA is created at conception. At conception is when an entirely new DNA is created, a DNA sequence that can't be found in anyone else (aside from twins), and it is separate from the parents' DNA. This DNA determines most things about the new person’s characteristics that would stick with her as he or she lives: looks, voice, eye color, skin color, brain structure, body structure, height, etc. Again, all this happens at conception, and at no other point in a person's life. The zygote doesn…
/r/MensRights05/04/12 07:21 PM
1

So when did the fetus get consent of the mother to harm her body? Shouldn't she have a right to prevent that harm? It didn't and that is why we have abortion laws, because she does have that right. If I were to scratch you I'd be killing millions of cells on your body, would that be equivalent to committing mass murder? No but if you kill all my cells then it would be murder. So if I was only one cell and you destroyed it then yes you would be killing me, just like killing all my cells, or doing…
/r/MensRights04/04/12 05:33 AM
1

If we draw the line at conception, as you want to do... well, honestly it just seems a ridiculous place to draw it. It's just a human cell at that point, not even divided. Why offer it more protection than any other cell in the human body? But it is its own cell, i can do anything to my cells because they are me, but i can't harm cells on anyone else without their consent. This one cell is its own cell. And even though it is just a cell, it is still a human cell. It really is just smaller than o…
/r/MensRights03/04/12 08:04 PM
1

None of us risk all of a sudden becoming 1 years old again either. Personally I believe life at conception because it is the most logical. The fetus is its own living organism with its own DNA structure. Making it birth makes the least amount of sense to me because it is the same thing before it was born and after it was born, just snip off a cord and change location.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 03:28 PM
1

I just don't understand then your logic for when a baby is a baby and when it is a fetus and a human apparently. Its like you think there has to be some right of passage for the baby to become human, when biologically it is pretty much the same.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 03:03 PM
1

well is a baby not born then if done trough a C-Section since they just cut it out of the woman and not birthed in the traditional fashion?
/r/MensRights03/04/12 12:12 AM
1

So the only difference between a baby and a fetus is location? Inside Fetus, Outside baby.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 08:18 PM
2

So do you believe in third trimester abortion because it is still a fetus?
/r/MensRights02/04/12 07:55 PM
3

He is forced into prison if he does not pay. So yes there is still infringement on bodily autonomy. And it is not if you collect a paycheck, you are obligated to pay. It's you are obligated to pay. When you lose your job and source of income child support doesn't just magically disappear.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 07:53 PM
2

The inequality that is the woman's choice to enslave a man financially for 18 years or not. Men do not have control over their own bodies when they are forced into debtors prison if they cannot pay child support. Yet you seem to be fine with that. On a side note may I ask what is the difference for you between a fetus and a baby? Since you were keen earlier on advocating what is best for children?
/r/MensRights02/04/12 07:12 PM
3

No, it is a men's right vs women's rights thing, there are other ways to do what is best for children and society. You are trying to say there is only one way of doing something and nothing else can even be considered. We could tax everyone and increase welfare for single parents. That would be one way of giving the child support that is needed. But this is not what is being discussed, what is being discussed is the gross inequality that is reproduction. And no it is not just a biological thing.…
/r/MensRights02/04/12 06:28 PM
7

Bodily: Of or concerning the body. Autonomous: Not controlled by others or by outside forces; independent 2. Independent in mind or judgment; self-directed. 3. a. Independent of the laws of another state or government; self-governing. b. Of or relating to a self-governing entity: an autonomous legislature. c. Self-governing with respect to local or internal affairs: an autonomous region of a country. 4. Autonomic. Pretty sure luciansolaris was correct in using bodily autonomy in that phrasing.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 06:17 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter