~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Personality exhibits positive associations with each measure of physical attractivenessThat's not how factor analysis works and the scores are objectively bad in many ways. For example, we don't know if they're quantitative and quantitative methods were used, we see local dependence, and the GFP wasn't evidenced based on dimensionality indices like omega-h. You don't know what r2 is or how to interpret it, you provide midwit commentary aplenty, and you certainly don't get factor analysis. | /r/BlackPillScience | 05/12/20 05:31 PM |
| 1 | Personality exhibits positive associations with each measure of physical attractivenessCope harder. | /r/BlackPillScience | 04/12/20 06:58 PM |
| 5 | Personality exhibits positive associations with each measure of physical attractiveness"The variance" explained is r2. You can obviously can use a linear correlation for dichotomous variables and there are dichotomous correlations. Do you not know how to translate r to d or odds? If two groups differ on a trait by 1 d by some continuous capped moderator and one group has 10% while the other has 90% with an SD in the lower group of 0,1 you would get an expected fully explanatory r of 0,125. That is 1,6% of the variance explaining a group difference of 1 d. The variance isn't even t… | /r/BlackPillScience | 04/12/20 06:54 PM |
| 2 | Personality exhibits positive associations with each measure of physical attractivenessDon't misinterpret r2 and don't claim effects are small when you haven't put them in practical or relative terms. The r of the 94% effective Moderna vaccine is 0.07. That's "0.049% of the variance" and is thus "ridiculously small", per your naïve understanding of statistics. Be more careful about measurement. The GFP wasn't even supported in the study as the scale wasn't unidimensional. This was psychometrically rubbish and not even for that reason alone. | /r/BlackPillScience | 04/12/20 06:16 PM |
| 3 | Cues of upper body strength account for most of the variance in men's bodily attractiveness [2017]Posted for the umpteen billionth time? | /r/BlackPillScience | 14/05/19 04:57 AM |
| 3 | Most female users of job-search website Shiftgig successfully rely on their looks to outcompete men and receive more interview requests.Don't sell yourself too short. Coding errors in datasets are way too common. NSID and NLSY have many. The NCPP is practically one big fuck-up. | /r/BlackPillScience | 13/05/19 09:59 PM |
| 3 | Most female users of job-search website Shiftgig successfully rely on their looks to outcompete men and receive more interview requests.There's a (non-open access) dataset I know of which would allow testing the contribution to permanent income over and above other variables. I'm sure we'll get sound estimates of the independent effect of attractiveness on income, education, other forms of success, &c., in a few years. Do you know of any openly available longitudinal datasets with variables for attractiveness, ability, motivation, and SES measures already? | /r/BlackPillScience | 13/05/19 09:24 PM |
| 1 | [Heightpill] 90% of M’Ladies consider you too short if you’re 5’4” or less. 2/3rds of M’Ladies consider you too short if you’re 5’7” or less.Your thumb, index, and ring fingers? | /r/BlackPillScience | 09/05/19 04:55 PM |
| 2 | [Heightpill] 90% of M’Ladies consider you too short if you’re 5’4” or less. 2/3rds of M’Ladies consider you too short if you’re 5’7” or less.Post source. | /r/BlackPillScience | 09/05/19 05:37 AM |
| 1 | A survey of Fortune 500 CEO height revealed that they were on average 6' tall, which is approximately 2.5 inches taller than the average American manfWHR evidence isn't robust. I'm still waiting on that guy who said he had a systematic meta coming on fWHR and test. | /r/BlackPillScience | 07/05/19 06:49 PM |
| 2 | I published a Medium article on heightismFailing to cite determinate research is a failure to test the hypothesis that discrimination drives height-related advantages. Leaving it underdetermined is annoying - the data mean something but not necessarily discrimination. | /r/BlackPillScience | 05/05/19 02:25 PM |
| 4 | I published a Medium article on heightismThe "evidence" for the correlation of height and intelligence is anything but concrete. No. In practically all population-representative studies, there is a moderate positive correlation between height and intelligence. This is in large part because people who are taller tend to have larger brains. In fact, if you actually read these studies You have read zero of them and if you had read any, it's doubtful you would have understood them. Studies that interpret these results conclude that they're… | /r/BlackPillScience | 05/05/19 01:04 AM |
| 4 | I published a Medium article on heightismThat's not how causal inference works. The relationship between height and income is accounted for by intelligence, for instance. You cannot say, without real evidence, that the disparity is due to discrimination. You're just assuming the association is evidence of bias without any actual evidence of bias, when there are other explanatory factors available, with real evidence. | /r/BlackPillScience | 04/05/19 11:02 PM |
| 4 | I published a Medium article on heightismDisparities alone do not evidence discrimination. | /r/BlackPillScience | 04/05/19 06:48 PM |
| 1 | I published a Medium article on heightismThis is retarded, but so are most discrimination theories. | /r/BlackPillScience | 04/05/19 06:16 PM |
| 2 | Study from another subHeritage :thinking: This is another one of those things just saying that bad behaviours are associated with bad behaviours for no clear reason -- Thorndike's dictum in action. | /r/BlackPillScience | 03/05/19 01:08 AM |
| 2 | Eating disorders in women positively correlated with intrasexual competitiveness for mates, and negatively with self perception of attractiveness (mating value). Eating disorders may have evolved as intrasexual mate competition taken to extremes. (Nettersheim et al. 2018)fading economic growth I put this into the category of ironic consequences of slowing LH. Economic growth supports it, but the lack of malleability and extreme adaptive phenotypes means we get less innovation. Now the extremes we end up with are extremely fat and skinny people! Intra-sexual competition (by proxy of self-sexualization on social media) was predicted by economic inequality, so the ecenomic factor is likely a big one, especially centralization/urbanization. Yes, and I think this is … | /r/BlackPillScience | 01/05/19 09:50 PM |
| 2 | Eating disorders in women positively correlated with intrasexual competitiveness for mates, and negatively with self perception of attractiveness (mating value). Eating disorders may have evolved as intrasexual mate competition taken to extremes. (Nettersheim et al. 2018)Should we expect a simple theory to explain outcomes of feminist ideology put into practice? I don't think it's terribly simple. Slow LH involves cavum septum pellucidum volume, amygdalar integrity, and a curvilinear association between height and LH speeds in women with a linear one in men among other biological associations. I am not of the opinion that it can be relegated to differences in choice protocols, nor can we ignore the salient role of strategic differentiation in the manifestation o… | /r/BlackPillScience | 01/05/19 07:35 PM |
| 4 | Eating disorders in women positively correlated with intrasexual competitiveness for mates, and negatively with self perception of attractiveness (mating value). Eating disorders may have evolved as intrasexual mate competition taken to extremes. (Nettersheim et al. 2018)Traits associated with living fast - being dangerous, having lots of sex, getting involved in crime, having shorter stature and greater disease risk, &c. - are positively associated and traits associated with living slow - having long-term goals and commitments, being more physically robust and hygienic, &c. - are also positively associated on a spectrum (In fact, individual dispositions towards cleanliness are associated with purity politics - not too relevant, but very neat). Here's a good int… | /r/BlackPillScience | 01/05/19 05:50 PM |
| 2 | Eating disorders in women positively correlated with intrasexual competitiveness for mates, and negatively with self perception of attractiveness (mating value). Eating disorders may have evolved as intrasexual mate competition taken to extremes. (Nettersheim et al. 2018)LH and IC are so intertwined. Faster LH, more sexual competition. Recently, however, we've been moving towards slower LH and increasing sexual competition, which is inconsistent with LHT but perhaps consistent with Woodley's SD-IE theory. | /r/BlackPillScience | 01/05/19 05:39 PM |
| 8 | What is the best piece of evidence you have that 'inceldom' is a real thing, and what would it take to change your mind?Not science. Wrong sub. | /r/BlackPillScience | 27/04/19 04:53 AM |
| 3 | sell me on the blackpill, without using logical fallaciesNot science. | /r/BlackPillScience | 27/04/19 04:14 AM |
| 6 | Interesting. Men with more hair = smaller genitals.So no support for the news headline in the main study? | /r/BlackPillScience | 26/04/19 08:46 PM |
| 1 | Interesting. Men with more hair = smaller genitals.I can't even find anything like it on Grueter's UNW page listing his citations. | /r/BlackPillScience | 26/04/19 07:04 PM |
| 13 | Interesting. Men with more hair = smaller genitals.Why isn't there a link to the study? | /r/BlackPillScience | 26/04/19 06:44 PM |
| 7 | Bare-faced cheat: Women 'better at hiding infidelity'Link study. | /r/BlackPillScience | 18/04/19 04:33 PM |
| 1 | A single personality trait is the foundation for almost all mental illness: studyyour argument then is that for every fat person, without constraining the supply of food, there exists a stimulus to initiate fat reduction behavior It's impossible for you to quote this. Because if your higher order mental resources are broken, which is also a physical constraint because "thinking" consists of AP in neurons, it is extremely unlikely you will initiate this kind of behavior. Anyway, everyone can lose weight. | /r/BlackPillScience | 15/04/19 01:29 AM |
| 2 | A single personality trait is the foundation for almost all mental illness: studyAnyone can choose to not be fat. I am not saying it's as easy for everyone and I don't think I'm projecting based on my own surfeit of willpower, as I've gotten plenty to improve themselves and there's no physical constraint on doing so. | /r/BlackPillScience | 13/04/19 08:54 PM |
| 2 | A single personality trait is the foundation for almost all mental illness: studyI don't even believe these interventions actually affect the trait, but that doesn't mean people can't elect to do something with themselves, even if choice isn't independent of personality and ef. | /r/BlackPillScience | 13/04/19 06:33 PM |
| 3 | A single personality trait is the foundation for almost all mental illness: studyOr forced. | /r/BlackPillScience | 13/04/19 03:10 PM |
| 24 | A single personality trait is the foundation for almost all mental illness: studyLink to the study? Also, highly heritable doesn't mean unalterable. BMI is highly heritable, but being fat is still a choice. | /r/BlackPillScience | 13/04/19 05:07 AM |
| 2 | Here is a better graph of the HCMST data99% sure we're dealing with heterogeneity in the samples. We just need more samples to determine if this is the case. | /r/BlackPillScience | 03/04/19 02:05 PM |
| 1 | Here is a better graph of the HCMST dataSo the only significant diffs are in the young and middle-aged groups, to be clear? | /r/BlackPillScience | 01/04/19 07:07 PM |
| 1 | Here is a better graph of the HCMST dataWhat are the little dots and stars about? | /r/BlackPillScience | 01/04/19 06:51 PM |
| 1 | Clearing up the virginity graph for brainlets. EVERYONE, GTFIHTry my selected age range with 95s. | /r/BlackPillScience | 31/03/19 03:51 PM |
| 4 | Clearing up the virginity graph for brainlets. EVERYONE, GTFIHMore notes: No sex in last year on the up-and-up for 18-30s; But not for 30-40s; Here are unmarried vs married 30-40s compared with unmarried vs married 18-30s. While subgroup analyses are fun, they do not tell us about causality. Yes, there is a direct relationship between the rise in sexlessness/virginity and the decline of marriage, but that doesn't tell us why that has declined. Enjoy. | /r/BlackPillScience | 31/03/19 04:06 AM |
| 9 | Clearing up the virginity graph for brainlets. EVERYONE, GTFIHYep. | /r/BlackPillScience | 31/03/19 03:44 AM |
| 15 | Clearing up the virginity graph for brainlets. EVERYONE, GTFIHIs this the trap? | /r/BlackPillScience | 31/03/19 03:37 AM |
| 1 | The new How Couples Meet and Stay Together dataset also confirms the incel trendAh, gotcha. Can you output a graph with CIs? | /r/BlackPillScience | 30/03/19 10:56 PM |
| 4 | The new How Couples Meet and Stay Together dataset also confirms the incel trendAmazing that they even include a "Do you consent to participate in this study?" question. Do you have a link to the variable descriptions (not seeing that on my phone)? I'm a bit confused by what the 1, 2, and 3 responses are here. | /r/BlackPillScience | 30/03/19 10:41 PM |
| -2 | Attractive businesswomen are considered less trustworthy, less truthful and more worthy of being fired than less attractive women, finds a new study (total n=1,202). This “femme fatale effect” taps into more primal feelings of sexual insecurity, jealousy and fear among both men and women.Unlikely. | /r/BlackPillScience | 25/03/19 11:55 PM |
| 3 | "Women on the Pill Choose Less Manly Men"The replication record for this finding is atrocious. | /r/BlackPillScience | 21/03/19 03:40 PM |
| 6 | Gang members had more sex partners than other men from the same neighborhood. Gang leaders had by far the most sex partners. (Palmer & Tilley, 1995)https://psyarxiv.com/edw4f/ | /r/BlackPillScience | 17/03/19 01:37 AM |
| 7 | Gang members had more sex partners than other men from the same neighborhood. Gang leaders had by far the most sex partners. (Palmer & Tilley, 1995)Who knows? I'm often surprised by the rate of homosexuality among Black men. Look at these estimates. It's as if Kinsey was right, but only for Blacks. | /r/BlackPillScience | 16/03/19 11:39 PM |
| 3 | Women judge and value men based on physical attractiveness to the same degree as men do with women. Men's most important trait by far to be liked by women is his physical attractivenessMany of the people here are posting titles that are intended to be shocking or extreme interpretations of the paper's real findings. In the case of most people here, who seem to lack any sense of discretion, I would recommend exact titles. You don't seem to try to generate shock like they do, so you're fine. | /r/BlackPillScience | 14/03/19 06:31 PM |
| 3 | Children are hitting puberty earlier than ever, specially girls and black childrenThere was some research a while back implicating obesity prevalence and leptin levels as a potential cause. | /r/BlackPillScience | 14/03/19 04:42 PM |
| 2 | Women judge and value men based on physical attractiveness to the same degree as men do with women. Men's most important trait by far to be liked by women is his physical attractivenessPost the actual title next time. | /r/BlackPillScience | 14/03/19 01:14 PM |
| -13 | A compilation on personalityThis is more /r/BlackPillComedy than /r/BlackPillScience. | /r/BlackPillScience | 10/03/19 08:38 PM |
| 2 | Psychopathy and Autism as Male Mating StrategiesThe only time I've had trouble getting in contact with a nearby researcher that I actually wanted to meet, it was Paul Romer. You can email most researchers and expect some sort of reply. | /r/BlackPillScience | 10/03/19 01:47 PM |
| 1 | If you are white, dark features are preffered over lightThey do not correspond to real-life outcomes. The measures used do not consistently correspond to anything. Cronbach's α is usually bad, and even when it's good, it doesn't align to what people actually select or end up with. Why are you posting here when you don't bother to familiarise yourself with prior posts or the material posted by, e.g., /u/subSaharanAmerican? | /r/BlackPillScience | 10/03/19 01:18 AM |
| 1 | If you are white, dark features are preffered over lightTheir results are incongruent with real outcomes and they don't consistently measure. | /r/BlackPillScience | 10/03/19 01:10 AM |
| 1 | If you are white, dark features are preffered over lightzero ecological validity/clearly a newposter/clearly unscientific | /r/BlackPillScience | 09/03/19 03:33 PM |
| 8 | If you are white, dark features are preffered over lightTrait-rating studies are practically useless. | /r/BlackPillScience | 09/03/19 02:36 PM |
| 2 | Psychopathy and Autism as Male Mating StrategiesThe Essential Difference. You will not learn this in a standard psych course. | /r/BlackPillScience | 09/03/19 02:47 AM |
| 3 | Psychopathy and Autism as Male Mating StrategiesWhen I discussed this with Simon Baron-Cohen, he expressed some dismay about the use of the word "masculine." It does not mean hyper-male in the sense of Conan the Barbarian, and it certainly doesn't imply it's all there is to ASD. Testosterone may be associated with more vulnerability to environmental insults and heritability can reflect canalised developmental trajectories, such that, say, having the genes disposing an individual to autism is to have the genes for greater fluctuating asymmetry… | /r/BlackPillScience | 08/03/19 11:34 PM |
| 0 | Women find narcissist "assholes" more attractive, male narcissists and psychopaths are perceived by women as more attractiveStop with your shitty unscientific titles. Also, trait-rating is a meme. | /r/BlackPillScience | 07/03/19 11:18 PM |
| 5 | In long-term relationships both sexes place a huge importance on the partner's facial attractiveness. Pretty face = happy relationship, ugly face = no relationshipPost the actual titles. | /r/BlackPillScience | 07/03/19 07:32 PM |
| 8 | A study confirms that over 60% of femoids wouldn't date a man who's 5'7, and the precentege increases as the height gets lowerPost the study and don't use such absurd titles in the future. | /r/BlackPillScience | 07/03/19 12:06 AM |
| 1 | People tend to overestimate their romantic partner's intelligence even more than their ownRegardless of political affiliation crassness is not smart. | /r/BlackPillScience | 06/03/19 11:14 PM |
| 1 | People tend to overestimate their romantic partner's intelligence even more than their ownThe majority of published literature shows precisely the opposite. For good examples, Caplan & Miller (2010), Oskarsson et al. (2015), Carl (2014, 2015), and Lewis & Bates (2018). In general, economic conservatism/liberalism (whatever you want to call it, the belief in economic freedom) is associated with intelligence. Social conservatism (defined variously as prejudice and the desire for social restrictions) is generally not. If you found the opposite, then clearly you were not looking at all. … | /r/BlackPillScience | 06/03/19 05:46 PM |
| 1 | People tend to overestimate their romantic partner's intelligence even more than their ownDon't studies show that people with a higher IQ tend to be left-wing? no | /r/BlackPillScience | 06/03/19 05:16 PM |
| 5 | The Paradox of Declining Female Happinesshttps://www.nber.org/papers/w24853 | /r/BlackPillScience | 06/03/19 12:28 AM |
| 3 | "Women prefer genetically-superior males regardless of behavior" Yeah, but WHAT KIND of women prefers those men? Are there any studies on which type of women prefers "Bad Boy Chad"?Not science. | /r/BlackPillScience | 28/02/19 06:24 PM |
| 9 | Women Get Bored With Sex in Long-Term RelationshipsBrilliant post. | /r/BlackPillScience | 16/02/19 08:56 PM |
| 3 | What a nice woman.Not science. Take it elsewhere. | /r/BlackPillScience | 11/02/19 02:45 AM |
| 5 | People tend to overestimate their romantic partner's intelligence even more than their ownAs am I. I once extremely over-evaluated a woman because she was pursuing a doctorate, worked at an SEO and tutored on the side, was very fit, right-wing, and had a big brain (no joke, she showed me the results of an MRI). All of that seemed impressive enough, but every indicator was wrong! | /r/BlackPillScience | 06/02/19 03:45 PM |
| 3 | How ugly is my chin?Not science. | /r/BlackPillScience | 04/02/19 09:06 PM |
| 3 | We have to save a maximum of content from hereJust stop making shitty posts and keep asking /u/SubSaharanAmerican if he'll mod someone like me or /u/SophisticatedBean. This place will not be banned if people don't shitpost. | /r/BlackPillScience | 01/02/19 02:19 PM |
| 1 | Are sociable people more beautiful? A zero-acquaintance analysis of agreeableness, extraversion, and attractivenessI think that the outgoingness bonus would exist even controlling for attractiveness, no? | /r/BlackPillScience | 27/01/19 06:31 AM |
| 2 | Thank youYou can download data from the IPCC and confirm that their predictions from the 1990s came to fruition. There is little scientific doubt about anthropogenic climate change. :^) | /r/BlackPillScience | 25/01/19 03:32 PM |
| 2 | Social Psychology is a joke.Not science. | /r/BlackPillScience | 24/01/19 05:13 PM |
| -12 | Thank youNot science. | /r/BlackPillScience | 24/01/19 05:00 PM |
| 34 | Female partner counts are rising while male partner counts overall are droppingMen also lie up about their partner counts. | /r/BlackPillScience | 23/01/19 07:47 PM |
| 2 | My 10+2 theory of roasties.+1 | /r/BlackPillScience | 23/01/19 07:29 PM |
| 16 | High status males invest more than high status females in lower status same-sex collaboratorsFewer? | /r/BlackPillScience | 22/01/19 02:57 PM |
| 1 | "Research demonstrates that, far from being arbitrary, our preferences and perceptions are at least in part governed by biological processes and that beauty is not just in the eye of the beholder."Link the papers she references. | /r/BlackPillScience | 14/01/19 04:02 PM |
| 23 | Shower Thought: Dating Apps create an abundance mentality which means you'll never truly appreciate someone or you might but the other person may not because they think someone better is out there so they won't fully invest in you.True for all attractive people. | /r/BlackPillScience | 12/01/19 10:09 PM |
| 1 | every time i see that scale from most masculine to least i think i'm looking at a young henry rollinsStudy? | /r/BlackPillScience | 07/01/19 03:09 PM |
| 3 | [Question]Are there any studies that show market value trade offs for men between facial attractiveness and height?Just convert both to dollars and compare. | /r/BlackPillScience | 06/01/19 01:55 AM |
| 3 | The Ultimate Physical Attractiveness CompilationThe person you're talking to is a nonce. They don't change their views, understand how to read sources, or really know much of anything at all. Of course they're going to make things up about how culture somehow precludes genetic effects and implies a powerful environment despite that making no sense at all and having zero evidence whatsoever. | /r/BlackPillScience | 01/01/19 02:57 PM |
| 2 | The Ultimate Physical Attractiveness CompilationQuite well. MR isn't perfect and I didn't say anything about the results for women. I know that equalising height (per Ritchie et al., 2017 or Gideon et al., 2018) does not equalise IQ for men and women, though Kanazawa found one sample where it did. Your link is talking about the BMJ study I linked. Take a look here as well. | /r/BlackPillScience | 21/12/18 06:13 PM |
| 3 | The Ultimate Physical Attractiveness CompilationBy genetic correlation are you referring to IQ-attractiveness correlation? Yes. Didn't more recent meta studies show that this correlation is tiny? Yes. However, it is still there (at least in the form of symmetry). I thought income attractiveness correlation is larger than that. For starting income, it's quite large. For permanent income, it's not as large (around 0,2, which is similar to the 0,12 of the IQ-developmental stability corr.). | /r/BlackPillScience | 21/12/18 06:05 PM |
| 3 | The Ultimate Physical Attractiveness CompilationI've posted tonnes of this before. Example papers: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0927537113000778 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3938855/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23593038/ https://www.bmj.com/content/352/bmj.i582.full https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1601-183X.2006.00208.x https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00429-018-1675-4 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2709415/ https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108… | /r/BlackPillScience | 21/12/18 03:36 PM |
| 1 | The Ultimate Physical Attractiveness CompilationIt's certainly not up to par. OVB is omitted variable bias. Essentially all of the height advantage in, say, income is down to higher IQ. | /r/BlackPillScience | 21/12/18 12:20 AM |
| 1 | The Ultimate Physical Attractiveness CompilationAny chance you'd like to redo the "Ultimate Heightpill" compilation, omitting instances of OVB? | /r/BlackPillScience | 20/12/18 09:35 PM |
| 1 | Are sex differences in preferences for physical attractiveness and good earning capacity in potential mates smaller in countries with greater gender equality?I don't see how that's a contradiction. Different things are being discussed. | /r/BlackPillScience | 13/12/18 03:01 AM |
| 16 | Morphological differences between Asian and Caucasian facesTrash post. | /r/BlackPillScience | 10/12/18 05:05 PM |
| 2 | Biology or social structure to blame for female choosiness?Oh so now you're lying. No. I didn't quote a academic statement detailing that the Breeder's equation is not meant to model evolutionary timescales, which is why you believe that there's no significant loss in genetic variance over time? You probably did not. Please post it if you believe this is the case. If you did, then you'll have to explain why that's true, when it doesn't appear true empirically, for much of any trait, such as intelligence, height, or any of the polygenic targets of domest… | /r/BlackPillScience | 07/12/18 01:23 AM |
| 2 | Are sex differences in preferences for physical attractiveness and good earning capacity in potential mates smaller in countries with greater gender equality?Yes, there are studies on it, they've been posted here, and your intuition is exactly wrong. | /r/BlackPillScience | 06/12/18 10:15 PM |
| 0 | The Ultimate Heightpill CompilationBut no OVB research | /r/BlackPillScience | 06/12/18 05:32 PM |
| 3 | Are sex differences in preferences for physical attractiveness and good earning capacity in potential mates smaller in countries with greater gender equality?Status, yes. The studies posted show an increase in female choosiness with more income inequality. They don't show that women become less selective than men at any known level of equality. | /r/BlackPillScience | 06/12/18 05:30 PM |
| 12 | Are sex differences in preferences for physical attractiveness and good earning capacity in potential mates smaller in countries with greater gender equality?no | /r/BlackPillScience | 05/12/18 05:14 PM |
| 3 | Interracial divorce rates compared to white couples (Yellow=Asian)I mean, they aren't all third cousins. The degree of homozygosity isn't that bad, and for traits under selective pressure, it probably isn't bad at all. There is genetic evidence for heterosis on EA in China, the Netherlands, &c. But those gains peter out substantially, rapidly (they also don't apply across populations in the manner many think). Pushing good variants to fixation is technically increasing homozygosity, but with positive effects (not likely to be primary, because polygenic traits … | /r/BlackPillScience | 05/12/18 02:29 AM |
| 9 | Interracial divorce rates compared to white couples (Yellow=Asian)They have more ROHs and clannish kin systems have made them collectivistic. Asia is very well-known for collectivism and clannishness in general. The most outbred non-African population is core Europeans, due largely to the influence of the Catholic Church. This is the presumed origin of WEIRD psychology and the globally aberrant Western individualism. | /r/BlackPillScience | 04/12/18 07:13 PM |
| 8 | Interracial divorce rates compared to white couples (Yellow=Asian)Indeed. While it's well-known now that slower life history speeds reduce sexual dimorphism, it's also theorised that consanguineous marriages reduce sexual dimorphism. China is quite a bit more inbred than the West and Africa, but this could be seriously underdetermined. | /r/BlackPillScience | 04/12/18 02:24 PM |
| 11 | Interracial divorce rates compared to white couples (Yellow=Asian)This is a good, relevant read. | /r/BlackPillScience | 04/12/18 03:19 AM |
| 7 | Education Level and Mating Success: Undercover on TinderExplains why few couples tend to have a woman with a higher IQ. | /r/BlackPillScience | 02/12/18 04:11 PM |
| 1 | Rational choice and evolutionary psychology as explanations for mate selectivityhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3130599/ | /r/BlackPillScience | 02/12/18 01:45 AM |
| 9 | What are some differences between a Chad and an Incel?Science is for Chads. The OP post is for Incels. | /r/BlackPillScience | 01/12/18 09:04 PM |
| 4 | Gender differences in mate selection preferences: A test of the parental investment modelIf their demands are met, sure. At some point in time, their bargaining power peters out. This does remind me of a Tacitus quote, though: Adjacent to the Suiones come the tribes of the Sitones, resembling them in all other respects, and differing only in this, that among them the woman rules: to this extent they have fallen lower not merely than freemen but even than slaves. | /r/BlackPillScience | 01/12/18 05:21 PM |
| 3 | Gender differences in mate selection preferences: A test of the parental investment modelA good memory is all. I generally remember things very well if I read them. If I've posted them, I feel like I get a sort of generation effect. You'll also like this. | /r/BlackPillScience | 01/12/18 04:48 PM |
| 5 | Gender differences in mate selection preferences: A test of the parental investment modelYes, in fact Ellis (1992) covers just that, by name. See here. | /r/BlackPillScience | 01/12/18 04:42 PM |
| 5 | Rational choice and evolutionary psychology as explanations for mate selectivityResearch on human OSR Yes, I've posted quite a bit on this in the past, to the same effect. Just a textbook! I'm not sure what this comment is for. Who cares about that Or this one. :D Or this. | /r/BlackPillScience | 30/11/18 10:50 PM |
| 4 | Biology or social structure to blame for female choosiness?How about your basic misunderstanding of the breeder's equation? Which is? You still haven't actually said it. You have any answer for the several statements of consensus that you flat out ignore? You mean when you quote from a philosophy encyclopaedia and treat is as consensus, or when you quote from a single person, long ago, about an idea which turned out to be wrong? This is documented here. | /r/BlackPillScience | 30/11/18 10:47 PM |
| 1 | Biology or social structure to blame for female choosiness?don't have access to the paper That could explain why you're so confident about the conclusions you're drawing from it: You literally don't know what it said (and you've made that more than clear even before you admitted it). The massive difference in significance in the comparisons and the lack of ability to determine what happened are clear and, the latter, discussed. Your comment here is good proof that you don't know what you're talking about (a fact which you have now admitted), so replies … | /r/BlackPillScience | 30/11/18 10:37 PM |
| 3 | Gender differences in mate selection criteria: Sociobiological or socioeconomic explanation?Quoting Ellis (1992): The structural powerlessness hypothesis is directly contradicted by available data. Interview studies of both medical students and leaders in the women's movement reveal that women's sexual tastes become more, rather than less, discriminatory as their wealth, power, and social status increases. And Tooby & Cosmides (1989): The assertion that 'culture' explains human variation will be taken seriously when there are reports of women war parties raiding villages to capture men… | /r/BlackPillScience | 30/11/18 10:05 PM |
| 2 | Hey guys. I'm making a new blackpill video on Alpha Fucks / Beta Bucks, and I'm looking for some studies so I can prove my points. Could anyone point me to some? Thanks!studies so I can prove my point Not scientific - degenerate. Take it elsewhere. | /r/BlackPillScience | 30/11/18 09:43 PM |
| 2 | A compilation of research about women preferring assholes before nice guysI told you not to make another reply in which you evidence not understanding this topic (while remaining smarmy, snarky, and cocksure) and you went and did it. No more replies - you just have no clue what you're talking about. It's no wonder when you make such egregious contradictions as, for instance, claiming high heritability is evidence against sexual selection while simultaneously holding that it isn't real. | /r/BlackPillScience | 30/11/18 09:41 PM |
| 5 | A compilation of research about women preferring assholes before nice guysnot delimited No one said it was, luckily. propinquity Again, not what the interest here is. you know the person Not really relevant. range restriction Not related. capture a huge Not stated. Their divergence from trait rating studies is unrelated to how much of the dating market they capture. initial versus final The outcome of interest being sex, that's amply covered by the numerous studies posted and well-covered by users like SubSaharanAmerican. first date to marriage Uncertain relevance. sa… | /r/BlackPillScience | 30/11/18 08:07 PM |
| 3 | Biology or social structure to blame for female choosiness?How did it "likely" come from that position? There's no reason to believe that sitting should make you more confident. Controlling for confidence, many values went insignificant for the girls. Why didn't that happen for the other group if what you've said is the case? | /r/BlackPillScience | 30/11/18 07:59 PM |
| 6 | Attractiveness of own-race, other-race, and mixed-race faces.what do you mean by qualify results. Like other posts such as this, tell us what the results say. There are very many interpretations to be had, and some are less valid than others. Yours is of interest, because you make a lot of similar posts, often with sensational titles, and you act hostile to users around here. attack my character Nowhere have I done that. I asked questions. Don't get defensive over nothing, just answer them and do so without acting obtuse. all other studies Are not posted … | /r/BlackPillScience | 30/11/18 06:57 PM |
| 5 | Attractiveness of own-race, other-race, and mixed-race faces.I'm not talking about the study, I'm talking about your posting habits. I asked whether you're mixed race, or otherwise motivated to make these posts, in the manner you tend to (sensational titles, hostile discussions). Now, I'll ask again: Do you want to qualify these results? It can be very illustrative of how a person thinks, seeing how they interpret a work. | /r/BlackPillScience | 30/11/18 05:49 PM |
| 4 | Attractiveness of own-race, other-race, and mixed-race faces.Thanks for reposting this with the proper title. Now, because of how you previously posted this and other studies, I'm going to guess that you yourself are mixed-race or that you're motivated to show that they're rated as more attractive for one reason or another. Are you willing to admit this is the case? Or, do you value objectivity and want to qualify these results? | /r/BlackPillScience | 30/11/18 05:40 PM |
| 1 | Evidence that facial features and skin tone have an interactive effect on perceptions of attractiveness and mixed-race faces are perceived as more attractive than single-race facesPost the study's actual title. Why do people continue to make up their own titles? At least it exposes your biases rather clearly. Super-averageness wins again. | /r/BlackPillScience | 30/11/18 05:33 PM |
| 3 | Biology or social structure to blame for female choosiness?p's of 0,058, 0,051, and 0,063 were interpreted as being significant. When they included self-confidence, many more of their values went insignificant or bordering on it. Odd that the normal condition, with the same n, was so much better powered, if culture was really the locus here. The authors do consider that people could be conditioned by their past interactions, but I think it's well known how that explanation turns out. (This is not the only way choosiness is established.) It's intellectua… | /r/BlackPillScience | 30/11/18 05:31 PM |
| 5 | A compilation of research about women preferring assholes before nice guysdoes not have ecological validity Yes, it does. The people on this sub do not care about propinquity effect and other long-term interactions in the dating market, instead, they care about having a chance in short-term mating and getting to even humour the possibility of an ideal longer-term partner without being rejected for appearances and such. If you misunderstand this sub and community, then you may want to ask why they lament posts where fake twitter accounts for models are shown to get abs… | /r/BlackPillScience | 30/11/18 05:03 PM |
| 3 | A compilation of research about women preferring assholes before nice guysSpeed dating is not trait rating. It is speed dating. It is valid for analysing dating. If you can't see the difference or understand the term, first, you didn't read the sidebar or the main posts here, and second, you're a low IQ lost cause. | /r/BlackPillScience | 30/11/18 04:09 AM |
| 2 | A compilation of research about women preferring assholes before nice guysNo. Trait rating studies are worthless, having basically no ecological validity. Why don't you even know the mod, /u/subSaharanAmerican? | /r/BlackPillScience | 30/11/18 12:50 AM |
| 2 | my personal anecdoteNot science. | /r/BlackPillScience | 28/11/18 10:05 PM |
| 18 | Do you bully women online? You're a low-status loser! Do you bully women IRL? You're a high-status Chad that gets sex!Remember to not sensationalise titles. Just post them as they are, for people to read. You can put your hot takes in the comments if you have to. Keep it scientific. Otherwise, enjoyed reading this. Thanks for posting. | /r/BlackPillScience | 28/11/18 03:41 PM |
| 22 | World’s first gene-edited babies created, claims ChinaThe whitest pill. | /r/BlackPillScience | 28/11/18 12:50 AM |
| 2 | What does the Black Pill Science say about blind women?not science | /r/BlackPillScience | 25/11/18 10:07 PM |
| 8 | The roles of altruism, heroism, and physical attractiveness in female mate choiceThe role of prosocial behaviour in female mate choice has been extensively explored, focusing on the desirability of altruism in potential mates, as well as altruism being a mating signal. However, little research has focused on the desirability of heroism and altruism in potential partners. Furthermore, the synergistic effect of attractiveness on the desirability of prosocial behavior has only recently been explored, and to our knowledge, has not been explored in relation to the desirability of… | /r/BlackPillScience | 23/11/18 08:33 PM |
| 3 | Is smart sexy? Examining the role of relative intelligence in mate preferencesWork on developing some nuance. | /r/BlackPillScience | 23/11/18 02:33 AM |
| 2 | Attractive Women Want it All: Good Genes, Economic Investment, Parenting Proclivities, and Emotional Commitmenthttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/S15327965PLI1101_01 http://cogweb.ucla.edu/Debate/CEP_Gould.html | /r/BlackPillScience | 22/11/18 11:11 PM |
| 28 | Lower attractiveness and higher weight in white women linked to greater interest in black males.Post studies directly, with proper titles. We do not want to be banned. | /r/BlackPillScience | 21/11/18 02:07 AM |
| 4 | Mate value at a glance: Facial attractiveness reveals women's waist-to-hip ratio and men's household income [combine with high heritability of facial characteristics for a strong case of OVB]Total coincidence that I found this after yesterday's imbroglio about income being attractive. Facial attractiveness is a good signal of current/future value, for good reason - g is related to greater wages, obviously, but it's also related to greater symmetry 1 2 3 4. Symmetry is well-known for its relation to physical attractiveness. In other terms, just have low mutational load. This is similar to the research showing that the height or proper weight income benefits are largely the result of … | /r/BlackPillScience | 21/11/18 12:04 AM |
| 4 | Is smart sexy? Examining the role of relative intelligence in mate preferencesSimilar articles: Perceived female intelligence as an economic bad in partner choice Intelligence and Mate Choice: Intelligent Men are Always Appealing Some People are Attracted to Intelligence: A Psychometric Evaluation of Sapiosexuality Exceptional Intelligence and Easygoingness May Hurt Your Prospects: Threshold Effects for Rated Mate Characteristics Note that these rating studies do not have much ecological validity. | /r/BlackPillScience | 20/11/18 06:22 PM |
| 2 | Only M matters or....the biological determinism aspect of the blackpill is likely false...it's worse than you think, or maybe betterHe doesn't understand OVB, so feel free to doubt it all. | /r/BlackPillScience | 19/11/18 11:11 PM |
| 1 | Only M matters or....the biological determinism aspect of the blackpill is likely false...it's worse than you think, or maybe betterNo you fucking idiot Not what I said. To quote: "Showing that different populations differ with respect to the effects of height does not prove that height hasn't been selected for, nor does it prove that it's attractive due to 'cultural conditioning' (whatever that means)." The link was a counter-example to the notion that a trait was cross-cultural and universal, which is all that is necessary to disprove a theory. It doesn't show that there's cultural conditioning, as you imply when you claim… | /r/BlackPillScience | 19/11/18 11:05 PM |
| 3 | Only M matters or....the biological determinism aspect of the blackpill is likely false...it's worse than you think, or maybe betterNo that link supports the non-universality of height as an attractive feature in all cultures Which has literally nothing to do with cultural conditioning, as you've implied. My argument against height, and several other traits, being subject to strong selective pressure was the fact that the h2 of these traits is high. Heritability being high often results from directional selection, actually. You would know this if you understood even the basics of animal breeding. If traits were all Mendelian… | /r/BlackPillScience | 19/11/18 08:51 PM |
| 1 | Only M matters or....the biological determinism aspect of the blackpill is likely false...it's worse than you think, or maybe betterSo you decided to edit your comment to add a lot. Not only that, but asserting 'muh homophily' as a "counter-argument" (loosest possible definition of argument used here) to the fact that traits exhibiting high h2 in a population are likely to have not been subject to strong selection is a non-sequitur. It is also not what I did. Not only that, but the fact that people mate with those similar to themselves would undercut a lot of arguments of the blackpill It would undercut literally none of the… | /r/BlackPillScience | 19/11/18 05:59 PM |
| 2 | Only M matters or....the biological determinism aspect of the blackpill is likely false...it's worse than you think, or maybe betterThat wasn't my argument regarding why height likely wasn't selected for, so... That link is your argument for cultural conditioning, even though it's not shown there. Oh, do you not understand that people learn value judgments from their cultures? You have not actually shown that and, as I've said, there's good reason to doubt. For example, political values and other proposed examples of vertical cultural transfer are not transmitted environmentally. Do you not get how that works? Yes. There is … | /r/BlackPillScience | 19/11/18 05:46 PM |
| 5 | Can this board find one? We know that it definitely can exist.This is not science. | /r/BlackPillScience | 19/11/18 04:43 PM |
| 1 | Only M matters or....the biological determinism aspect of the blackpill is likely false...it's worse than you think, or maybe betterIt's likely the product of cultural conditioning: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26079105 Showing that different populations differ with respect to the effects of height does not prove that height hasn't been selected for, nor does it prove that it's attractive due to "cultural conditioning" (whatever that means). This borders on the level of ignorance of saying that audit studies and disparities between groups prove discrimination, or observational studies allow meaningful inferences into … | /r/BlackPillScience | 19/11/18 03:39 PM |
| 1 | Only M matters or....the biological determinism aspect of the blackpill is likely false...it's worse than you think, or maybe betterYou appear to know jack-shit about genetics or attraction. | /r/BlackPillScience | 18/11/18 08:15 PM |
| 8 | What i have noticedNow this is science. Stop posting. | /r/BlackPillScience | 18/11/18 08:12 PM |
| 1 | Feminists and Leftists in Finland are campaigning to redefine rapeThe mods aren't active, so it's up to you to not post terrible non-science like what you've just done. | /r/BlackPillScience | 15/11/18 09:41 PM |
| -1 | Feminists and Leftists in Finland are campaigning to redefine rapeNo, you're talking politics, not science. There's nothing scientific about your post. Take it to a politics subreddit. It would be a terrible outcome, this sub getting banned. | /r/BlackPillScience | 15/11/18 09:15 PM |
| 7 | Study confirms that robut jaw line and defined brow ridge are important. Also confirmed: beards signal betabux to femoids ("social dominance", "long term relationship" vs. Chad's sexual dominance)To avoid a politics-related ban and to remain maximally informative, just use the real title. | /r/BlackPillScience | 15/11/18 09:14 PM |
| 3 | Race mixing, just don't.If you want more like this, just look at the literature on admixture and birth outcomes. | /r/BlackPillScience | 15/11/18 09:13 PM |
| 3 | Feminists and Leftists in Finland are campaigning to redefine rapeNot science - politics is likely to get the sub noticed. | /r/BlackPillScience | 15/11/18 09:09 PM |
| 2 | Are we attracted to those who look similar to ourselves?Some incel sub. Not here. | /r/BlackPillScience | 14/11/18 04:14 AM |
| 15 | A question about what makes an incelThis isn't science. | /r/BlackPillScience | 14/11/18 01:40 AM |
| 10 | Are we attracted to those who look similar to ourselves?I want it to be a science sub, as it was intended to be. | /r/BlackPillScience | 14/11/18 01:40 AM |
| -5 | Racial preferenceOf science. Take the stupid shit to incel subs. | /r/BlackPillScience | 14/11/18 01:39 AM |
| 6 | Are we attracted to those who look similar to ourselves?Stop posting non-science. | /r/BlackPillScience | 13/11/18 10:56 PM |
| -2 | Racial preferenceNot science. | /r/BlackPillScience | 13/11/18 10:56 PM |
| 9 | Upper vs Middle vs Lower thirdsScience > your post | /r/BlackPillScience | 13/11/18 10:55 PM |
| 2 | How many % grinder users state not for hookeups in their profile? And how is their attractiveness rating distributed?Not science. | /r/BlackPillScience | 13/11/18 02:06 AM |
| 6 | what surgeries did he get?Non-scientific ones, which is why he doesn't belong here. | /r/BlackPillScience | 11/11/18 11:13 PM |
| 27 | Just discovered blackpill... as a fairly average looking guy what do I do then?You start your new life by not posting non-science on this science subreddit. | /r/BlackPillScience | 11/11/18 06:56 PM |
| 9 | Government statistics prove unprecedented female hypergamy in Finland: Males with at least 2 sexual partners in the last year declines from 35-50% in 1992-2007 to around 15% in 2015. No significant change to the amount of sexual partners for females during the same time period.Ah, turns out I mistook the news article author for the author of the study. But yes. | /r/BlackPillScience | 10/11/18 05:55 PM |
| 24 | Government statistics prove unprecedented female hypergamy in Finland: Males with at least 2 sexual partners in the last year declines from 35-50% in 1992-2007 to around 15% in 2015. No significant change to the amount of sexual partners for females during the same time period.First scientific post in weeks. Good stuff. There's a similar study in Norway, published by Amundsen in 2014. I don't have access to it - if anyone can get it, post it. | /r/BlackPillScience | 10/11/18 05:33 PM |
| 11 | If the preference for whites is innate biologically, why are women attracted to white men much more so than men being exclusively attracted to white women?Stop it with the non-science. | /r/BlackPillScience | 10/11/18 01:54 PM |
| 6 | Any studies on testosterone relegation to attractiveness?This is not the sub for asking for studies, it is for posting them. Go to Google Scholar, CrossRef, Web of Science, or whatever you want to, and look up your own damn studies. Almost every post for the past few weeks has been similar garbage. | /r/BlackPillScience | 09/11/18 12:16 AM |
| 4 | Does anyone else think that diet plays/played a huge role in height and forward growth of faces in the West vs other countries, perhaps even more so than geneticsAll aspects like that are heritable. If you have a single source real source showing otherwise, do say it. Conjecture is silly. The Jantz and Sparks analyses do not support masticatory stress as the explanadum for current changes including those relating to the protrusion of the mandible. | /r/BlackPillScience | 07/11/18 11:41 PM |
| 17 | Does anyone else think that diet plays/played a huge role in height and forward growth of faces in the West vs other countries, perhaps even more so than geneticsNo, facial structure is highly-heritable, and there is only negative evidence for, e.g., masticatory stress being involved in secular trends in facial morphology. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5289863/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5395823/ https://arizona.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10150/288105/azu_td_6919258_sip1_m.pdf https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17628252 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21541933 | /r/BlackPillScience | 07/11/18 10:08 PM |
| 4 | Have you ever had a seemingly unrelated conflict with someone that revealed incompatible underlying ways of looking at the world? How did you navigate that conflict?Not science. | /r/BlackPillScience | 03/11/18 02:20 PM |
| 5 | Attractiveness and treatment by othersNot science. | /r/BlackPillScience | 02/11/18 01:45 PM |
| 12 | physiological effects of InceldomNot science. | /r/BlackPillScience | 02/11/18 04:39 AM |
| 0 | Studies that prove that women make up their mind whether to see you as a potential mate or not in the first few seconds/minutes/hours?Propinquity effect has some good empirical backing. Additionally, preference shift in women for social and attachement reasons is well-noted. | /r/BlackPillScience | 26/10/18 11:37 PM |
| 2 | A subreddit for posting screenshots of blackpilled tweetsRight, but this is a science sub. This has no place here. | /r/BlackPillScience | 22/10/18 01:29 AM |
| 2 | A subreddit for posting screenshots of blackpilled tweetsI don't care for non-science subs. | /r/BlackPillScience | 22/10/18 01:17 AM |
| 2 | A subreddit for posting screenshots of blackpilled tweetsThis is not science. | /r/BlackPillScience | 22/10/18 01:05 AM |
| 3 | Threesome requirement in Japan: don’t be Japanese (if male)Take this shit out of here. | /r/BlackPillScience | 18/10/18 06:25 PM |
| 2 | Wages, intelligence and physical appearanceChildhood nutrition doesn't enjoy a positive vector correlation with IQ. For IQ to result from it would imply a miracle or comparisons with people so severely deprived they likely only exist in the bush of Africa. Attractiveness doesn't offer a wage benefit beyond the higher IQ of attractive people. Employers may use attractiveness to gauge skill, instead of simply discriminating. What's more, more attractive employees might incur additional benefits when interacting with customers, so there's n… | /r/BlackPillScience | 17/10/18 12:05 AM |
| 1 | Reminder that it's not just dating. Lookism affects every aspect of our lives (x-post from /r/braincels)Yes, I'm sure of this. All of the empirical tests confirm this contention and not the theoretically unsound Lookism model. | /r/BlackPillScience | 10/10/18 09:23 PM |
| 2 | Study Request - Anything on the psychology of bluepillersI think it's remarkably perceptive! | /r/BlackPillScience | 08/10/18 05:53 PM |
| 2 | Study Request - Anything on the psychology of bluepillersAlso neuroticism: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22070886 | /r/BlackPillScience | 07/10/18 11:57 PM |
| 6 | DATING IS LIKE AN RPG WHERE YOU NEED TO PASS A LOOKS CHECKS TO GET CERTAIN DIALOGUE OPTIONNot science. | /r/BlackPillScience | 07/10/18 11:57 PM |
| 2 | Based Louie CKThis isn't science. | /r/BlackPillScience | 01/10/18 02:20 PM |
| 1 | Reminder that it's not just dating. Lookism affects every aspect of our lives (x-post from /r/braincels)I've made posts on it before. The gist is that attractive people, taller people, make their companies more money, are more confident, are more intelligent, &c., and prior differences associated with the trait of interest - attractiveness - explain their boons, not discrimination. | /r/BlackPillScience | 05/09/18 03:26 PM |
| 2 | Reminder that it's not just dating. Lookism affects every aspect of our lives (x-post from /r/braincels)This is an incredibly foolish interpretation. | /r/BlackPillScience | 04/09/18 01:53 PM |
| 0 | This big, fat, BBW escort, who has almost 100 feedbacks, earns £130ph fucking thirsty men. Is there a blackpill science explanation for this, or is it just over?You, unironically, have a very low IQ. There's no the faintest whiff of intelligent comprehension, nuance, or veracity in anything you've said. What you're doing is tantamount to responding to the observation that most gunshot victims lives by posting pictures of dead gunshot victims. | /r/BlackPillScience | 25/08/18 07:26 PM |
| 2 | Another 50yr old escort Iocal to me, over 300+ feedback, earning £125ph to fuck thirsty men. Still think the wall is real?They're more popular. You'd know that if you read this corpus. You didn't and my money is on that you won't. You are inept and you've delivered not one argument or iota of data here today. | /r/BlackPillScience | 25/08/18 06:52 PM |
| 0 | Another 50yr old escort Iocal to me, over 300+ feedback, earning £125ph to fuck thirsty men. Still think the wall is real?Not all younger women make more money. Stop acting like corr. = 1. There are a lot of factors to consider in price tbh. No shit. Plus London is known as being packed with escorts and a lot of competition. Great! It's different in other parts of the country which is what I said. I can go to Luton or Liverpool or Manchester or Aber-fucking-deen and younger, more attractive women will still tend to command higher prices than their older, uglier, and less fertile counterparts. Market yourself as upp… | /r/BlackPillScience | 25/08/18 06:27 PM |
| 1 | Another 50yr old escort Iocal to me, over 300+ feedback, earning £125ph to fuck thirsty men. Still think the wall is real?simply that it's not the case that younger women command more money or that all clients would pay more for a younger woman than an older one. That's incorrect, empirically. I know of no existing data indicating the opposite or a null effect of age. You keep claiming to have access to such a dataset by your implications, but you have yet to deliver! I think the reason why is that your data doesn't exist. How do you explain women who are much much older still pulling in hundreds of clients? Why wo… | /r/BlackPillScience | 25/08/18 06:15 PM |
| 0 | Another 50yr old escort Iocal to me, over 300+ feedback, earning £125ph to fuck thirsty men. Still think the wall is real?Your data is written by a South Korean using an Indonesian prostitute sample. JFL. Those places are hotbeds for child sex tourists, of course age affects earnings there. It actually reflects it in almost every case examined thus far. I'm in the UK so I'm talking about the game here not on the other side of the world. I am also in the UK, and London whores get more for being younger, ime. | /r/BlackPillScience | 25/08/18 05:54 PM |
| 1 | Another 50yr old escort Iocal to me, over 300+ feedback, earning £125ph to fuck thirsty men. Still think the wall is real?lose all desirability No it isn't. That doesn't even make any sense (and "the wall" isn't some theory written out as such). You're lying and doing a bad job of it, very clearly. It's like reading the ramblings of a madman who doesn't bother with objectivity at all. There is more data to support prostitute age negatively affecting earnings: https://www.ehbonline.org/article/S1090-5138(16)00004-0/fulltext. There is no data to suggest an older age premium or a null relationship. Here's something to… | /r/BlackPillScience | 25/08/18 05:21 PM |
| -1 | One of many 50+ local escorts in my are earning well over £100 to fuck incels and other thirsty guys. Has 100s of feedback. The wall is COPEAre you retarded? That you hold such an exaggerated impression of people you disagree with speaks volumes about your lack of credibility and bad faith, not to mention that all you seem to proffer is insipid drivel I'm supposed to take your word on. When asked for data, to be clear, your response is to fail to provide any, yes? If not, then provide proof. You have not done anything of the sort so far. | /r/BlackPillScience | 25/08/18 04:41 PM |
| 7 | Younger Escorts Advertise Higher Charges Online than Older Escorts for Sexual Services Cross-CulturallyPost your proof. I am aware of no data supporting your contention and you haven't tried at all to justify what you're saying with any rigour. | /r/BlackPillScience | 25/08/18 04:33 PM |
| 3 | One of many 50+ local escorts in my are earning well over £100 to fuck incels and other thirsty guys. Has 100s of feedback. The wall is COPEDisgusting. I'm not sure how posting pictures of whores proves your point, though. | /r/BlackPillScience | 25/08/18 04:04 PM |
| 1 | Another 50yr old escort Iocal to me, over 300+ feedback, earning £125ph to fuck thirsty men. Still think the wall is real?How does this say anything about the wall whatsoever? | /r/BlackPillScience | 25/08/18 03:55 PM |
| 7 | Younger Escorts Advertise Higher Charges Online than Older Escorts for Sexual Services Cross-CulturallyOK, so, the data says otherwise, but your anecdote remains. Who am I to trust, you, or hard numbers which I can back up with my own anecdotes? | /r/BlackPillScience | 25/08/18 03:44 PM |
| 6 | Younger Escorts Advertise Higher Charges Online than Older Escorts for Sexual Services Cross-CulturallyThey do command higher prices - that is the empirical observation delivered in the above piece. | /r/BlackPillScience | 25/08/18 03:07 PM |
| 6 | Younger Escorts Advertise Higher Charges Online than Older Escorts for Sexual Services Cross-Culturally"I know old people who charge higher prices" ≠ "Older people tend to command higher prices." The former can totally be the case, while the latter is empirically untrue. | /r/BlackPillScience | 25/08/18 02:53 PM |
| 8 | Younger Escorts Advertise Higher Charges Online than Older Escorts for Sexual Services Cross-CulturallyThis just isn't true at all I hope you revise that to "it's just true in the real world but not in my anecdotes." | /r/BlackPillScience | 25/08/18 02:18 PM |
| 1 | Younger Escorts Advertise Higher Charges Online than Older Escorts for Sexual Services Cross-CulturallyConfirming that men don't have as much of a wall, trannies also charge higher prices than real girls. | /r/BlackPillScience | 23/08/18 04:21 PM |
| 2 | What science actually says about physical attraction (with actual science inside)That is not a quote of me saying that it 'ends the debate'. Please, try again. Yet another cocksure challenge immediately deflated because you can't keep your own arguments coherent. Would you like to quote where I said that it ends the debate? I said that it reveals the effect to be a statistical artefact, which it most certainly is. Do you have contradictory evidence? I linked most of the (good) contradictory evidence I know, but you seemed to take it as my having not read those articles and y… | /r/TheRedPill | 18/05/17 05:56 PM |
| 3 | What science actually says about physical attraction (with actual science inside)Your edits are pretty incredible, since they reveal that you don't understand at all what I commented. I posted papers which are for and against on this issue. Your attempt to misinterpret Ferguson, though, is pretty sad. The point was thus: to actually debate the topic, not to sit around in ideology and preconceptions that one doesn't want changed. Read both meta-analyses (for and against) and see that the side that is against is decidedly stronger, and the side that is for utilises bad statist… | /r/TheRedPill | 18/05/17 05:23 PM |
| 2 | What science actually says about physical attraction (with actual science inside)I read all of the papers that I linked, both for and against on this topic. The papers against are far stronger. | /r/TheRedPill | 18/05/17 05:19 PM |
| 1 | What science actually says about physical attraction (with actual science inside)You posted a meta-study that did their own statistical modelling on previous ones and found no significant effect. Yes, after controlling for actual menstruation versus a broad definition which doesn't comport with what it actually is, they found no effect. Can you fault this? 58 failures to replicate 58 failures to show significant effects (failures to replicate). | /r/TheRedPill | 18/05/17 05:06 PM |
| 3 | What science actually says about physical attraction (with actual science inside)Wrong. OK, so they did find the effect, but Wood et al. lied? Could you show that? If you need, I can give you the supplementary data. No, when taken differently. Whether that's more careful or not is another matter entirely. When taken as behaviour-estimated menstruation, or, not controlled for pre-ovulation hormonal levels, sure. It's not really another matter, it's the whole of the matter we're discussing. It's fairly easy to see that if you fail to control for pre-ovulation hormones, you're … | /r/TheRedPill | 18/05/17 04:36 PM |
| 4 | What science actually says about physical attraction (with actual science inside)That's not a replication study It's a meta-analysis of 58 studies of the finding that menstruation changes female mate preference to favour men of high genetic worth (high testosterone, masculinity, symmetry, dominance, &c.). it does not imply that 59 replication studies failed. So, the 58 studies failed to find the effect. What do you call this but failed replication? What it shows is that under their own statistical re-modeling of previous results the effect becomes insignificant, which in its… | /r/TheRedPill | 18/05/17 04:31 PM |
| 6 | What science actually says about physical attraction (with actual science inside)Post the other replication studies. Here's a meta-analysis of 58, showing the effect is a statistical artefact and it failed to replicate at least 59 times. | /r/TheRedPill | 18/05/17 03:42 PM |
| 4 | What science actually says about physical attraction (with actual science inside)Of course I didn't link to more than one study. That's clear. Menstruation, however, doesn't lead to women liking more masculine men, for an obvious reason: it's confounded by hormonal predisposition. More feminine women of course like more masculine men, but fluctuations don't turn women rabid for musclemen and if you'll read, that effect was for short-term relationships anyway. | /r/TheRedPill | 18/05/17 03:25 PM |
| 4 | What science actually says about physical attraction (with actual science inside)Wrong. That finding failed to replicate - six times. http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2017/05/11/136549 (2017) Jones et al. fail to replicate the results of Pappas (2010) and Whiteman (2014), but they still confirm that "women generally preferred masculinized over feminized versions of men's faces, particularly when assessing men's attractiveness for short-term, rather than long-term, relationships." This effect, however, may not be due to ovulation, and more due to simply being women. Women who… | /r/TheRedPill | 18/05/17 03:08 PM |
| 1 | Blue Pill example: Cuck co-worker begging to be bent over and get drilled for the rest of his life.Glad to see you here, mate. | /r/TheRedPill | 15/05/17 04:38 AM |
| 12 | MOD Notice- We remove your shit if you suck.I want more of the old female Psych posts. I feel like everything now is a repost and I get better reading following /u/of_bronze_and_fire. | /r/TheRedPill | 31/03/17 01:04 AM |
| 3 | The Red Pill RightSex is political, per the descent of man and institution of monogamy. | /r/TheRedPill | 04/02/17 03:01 PM |
| 15 | Degenerate by Design: The Facts Behind Rockefeller Funding of FeminismTRP nearly naming the Jew? I'll be! | /r/TheRedPill | 22/01/17 01:01 AM |
| – | Volunteering in a primarycare doctors office for 2 years opened my eyes...American girls are - luckily - not as bad. | /r/TheRedPill | 17/01/17 01:15 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter