TranquilityAndPeace Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Justice is served I am sorry, I mistook the explanation of his comment as your opinion.	/r/MensRights	28/08/18 02:32 PM
1	Justice is served I have 2 questions for you: 1. Why would my proposal not be a "HUGE deterrent"? 2. Do "HUGE deterrents" work?	/r/MensRights	28/08/18 10:44 AM
-2	Justice is served So how exactly do you correct that? Why do you ask me that? I never said anything would correct that. We ware talking about what a good punishment would be, not to "correct" it. You could also imprison the false accuser for life or give out the death penality, is that the justice you seek? Would that "correct" everything for the innocent?	/r/MensRights	26/08/18 01:58 PM
9	Justice is served Now I understand you. To answer you: I can't, but I wanted to focus on the illegal things they did and possible reimbursement (for defamation). So I'm fine with rape and false rape accusations having the same punishment. That is ok, but the accused won't get reimbursed that way. Getting around 2-10 years prison time, paying the reimbursement of the victim and being added to the sex offender list sounds for me to be better for the victims.	/r/MensRights	26/08/18 10:18 AM
16	Justice is served Could you rephrase your comment? I want to answer you, but I don't understand your comment at all.	/r/MensRights	26/08/18 09:36 AM
39	Justice is served False rape accusers that have been convicted as guilty in the court of law should be given the same sentence as rapists. I hear this very often, but I am against it. This makes people think these are the same crimes. Why not use everything they did for the accusation for the sentence? - Producing false evidence = 9-36 months. - Perjury = up to five years - Defamation = (Up to federal states, should be reworked to help the person that got damaged) Defamation should probably be paying for the dama…	/r/MensRights	26/08/18 07:27 AM
1	3 men acquitted, still named. Mom's name still unknown. What do marches accomplish?	/r/MensRights	09/05/18 09:14 PM
1	There are 3 types of lies: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics. •Since you began college, has someone had sexual contact with you when you were unable to provide consent or stop what was happening because you were passed out, drugged, drunk, incapacitated, or asleep? This question asks about incidents that you are certain happened. Since you understand the study better than me, does that mean that a drunk person is automatically beein sexually assaulted/raped if they had sex while drunk? (Because this reminded me of the poster "she was drunk she could not co…	/r/MensRights	14/08/17 02:16 PM
2	THE BILL OF FAMILY RIGHTS #2: Befriend the financial donors of your state House of Representatives, state Senate, and state Governor. Collectively the donors can change the law if organized. Start with the largest economies first: CA, TX, NY, and FL. (Crosspost from TheRedPill) Stopped reading at "the profit-driven family court." Well, then i guess everyone can stop reading your comment at this Point, because impoliteness only brings you that far.	/r/MensRights	13/07/17 09:06 AM
3	Male Statutory rape victim forced to pay child support You should try to say this in r/Feminism, you would instantly get banned for "victim blaming". I think you are right about them beeing capabale and perhaps even mentally old enough, but the question is, did he choose to be a father? Did he know that he becomes a father through sex? Would she abort the pregnancy if he did not want a kid?	/r/MensRights	19/06/17 09:24 AM
2	love how they still managed to make women being more successful into women being victims somehow Seems like HR and the equal opportunity commissioner should care for that, otherwise the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission should get a tip.	/r/MensRights	19/05/17 09:50 AM
2	Obama undermines Trump on civil rights with last-minute appointments "Lhamon co-authored the infamous 2011 “Dear Colleague” letter from the Education Department’s Office for Civil Rights, which severely limited accused students’ due process rights when suspected of sexual assault or harassment." The letter did, however, restrict rights for accused students by lowering the burden of proof needed to brand a student a rapist and punish them for sexual assault. The burden of proof changed from “clear and convincing” to a “preponderance of evidence,” a standard that simply means more likely than not. The letter also strongly discouraged schools from allowing students to cross-examine each other and witnesses because “allowing an alleged perpetrator to question an alleged victim directly may …	/r/MensRights	05/01/17 05:20 PM