TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TransFatAcceptance Archive

View 0 posts and 206 comments by TransFatAcceptance on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

But I have a job! Selling candles and Tupperware and other multi-level marketing pyramids. I'm a self employed consultant!!
/r/MensRights23/10/17 07:25 PM
8

This is the reason why so many feminists were pissed at men who posted #metoo
/r/MensRights23/10/17 07:22 PM
5

Sad that nobody cares about male victims of sexual assault until a woman says something about it
/r/MensRights23/10/17 07:19 PM
9

Modern feminism is a gigantic roadblock for men's issues. Not only do feminist organizations like NOW fight against the progress attempted by men's groups, but they monopolize public discourse (and public funding) on gender issues and use those positions of power to stifle any discussion about men's issues. Go look at how much progress the "feminist approved" mens lib movement has made. Oh, you can't, because they're only allowed to self-flagellate as penance for being born male.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 07:56 PM
7

Men's issues are routinely trivialized and ignored because women are so oppressed that there just isn't a free second to discuss men's problems. The bullshit being fed to women in universities all over the western world is one of the largest contributors to the marginalization of disadvantaged and abused men.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 07:53 PM
25

You don't say! There was a survey posted recently in twox showing that something like 20% of women without a college education think women are oppressed, but the number shot up to like 60% for women who attended college. University faculty is being overrun with feminists who fetishize victimhood. It's quite amazing. These women go to college where they: are the majority demographic on campus receive more financial aid and opportunity have more resources and support (women's centers, women-only s…
/r/MensRights22/10/17 07:44 PM
3

Another NISVS, another round of feminists ignoring male victims to maintain their narrative. I like how they still don't consider made to penetrate as rape (thanks Mary Koss!) and this report they just dropped the 12 month figures.
/r/MensRights06/08/17 07:48 PM
1

This effort to push gender politics and manufactured outrage into the hard sciences is abhorrent.
/r/MensRights06/08/17 07:40 PM
2

They are too narcissistic to think about anyone but themselves
/r/MensRights26/07/17 05:50 PM
7

What's the reason? Does your dick fall off if you sleep with a woman who's had more than 10 partners?
/r/MensRights23/07/17 07:13 PM
-1

Yeah, because if you sleep with a woman who isn't a virgin, then you're totally gay because it's like your penis is touching other men's penises!
/r/MensRights23/07/17 07:11 PM
8

Oh no I'd ditch that bitch in a heartbeat, but why risk it? Because mental health and balanced social adjustment are far more important than impressing a shallow woman. I had a girlfriend call me a pussy because I cried at my father's funeral. Like... Are you fucking kidding me? If I'd taken that as "a dose of red pill truth" I'd be a fucking mental disaster. It's completely dysfunctional. Now I'm in a relationship with an actual adult, and I cried at her father's funeral. You know what she did?…
/r/MensRights23/07/17 07:05 PM
1

I'm 14 and this is deep
/r/MensRights23/07/17 06:56 PM
9

Or you could not reward assholes with your time and attention. If a woman "lost respect" for me because I showed emotion, she'd be kicked to the curb in a heartbeat​. I don't have time for that childish bullshit. I think it's so god damn funny that you RP types rally about how great men are and how shitty women are, then you say that men need to modify their behaviour to have shitty relationships with shitty women. You're a joke, mate.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 06:53 PM
4

That sub is a shithole. Aside from the mentally unstable posters who can barely string together coherent sentences, the place is just a circlejerk of unsubstantiated claims and downvotes. The irony is when they dismiss legitimate questions with hyperbolic drivel about "straw feminists", then you scroll down a few posts and there they are. For example... Top comment: "I've never seen a feminist that thinks men don't have problems. They don't exist." Next three comments: "men don't have problems"
/r/MensRights15/07/17 06:46 PM
7

Do they have a budget for aid to all the young boys who can't get an education because they'll be murdered by boko haram? Hint: They don't. Total foreign aid was cut by Trudeau's "feminist" government, but surprise surprise funding to help girls access birth control and feminine hygiene products doubled.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 05:57 AM
2

Someone should contact CAFE about this. I'm sure they are already aware, but are they taking any action? Seems like a low hanging fruit.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 07:50 PM
2

Didn't Swedish feminists petition the government to shut down their affirmative action laws because they started helping men get a college education?
/r/MensRights23/06/17 01:25 AM
11

Because three decades of feminist propaganda can't stop a million years of evolution
/r/MensRights23/06/17 01:22 AM
1

The problem isn't there's no one for women to marry That's because you're not thinking like a gynocentric perpetual victim. Everything is about brave women and their struggles against oppression.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 01:21 AM
7

This violates Reddit's site-wide rules. Notify the admins. TwoX mods are some of the worst pieces of vile garbage on this website.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 01:12 AM
15

It's called Rough and Tumble Play. Even young girls benefit from this play style but it's practically essential for young boys. Feminists are so concerned about boys learning consent and boundaries, which is exactly what they learn through rough and tumble. So why does the feminized education system punish boys who engage in this type of play? You know what dads do when their sons are hyperactive and full of energy? They go play catch. What do moms do? Take them to the doctor and get them hopped…
/r/MensRights17/06/17 07:34 PM
12

"Fathers need to take more active roles in raising children." "Ugh why is there a man here? This makes me uncomfortable."
/r/MensRights17/06/17 07:29 PM
4

Young boys need male role models, not crazy feminist moms with warped views on consent and rape culture.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 07:25 PM
1

White feminism in action. Meanwhile black single moms are trying to overcome substance abuse and poverty so their sons don't end up career criminals.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 07:22 PM
3

I'll be in my bunk
/r/MensRights17/06/17 07:21 PM
2

Default status ruined TwoX tho
/r/MensRights15/06/17 07:00 PM
26

Throwing innocent men under the bus to hide infidelity is trait #2 or #3 (depending on the list) of Toxic Femininity. Of course, you can also argue that it's just a variant of trait #1, which is never taking responsibility for your actions.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 06:58 PM
2

Even 7 year olds don't stand naked in the street screaming until they pass out. 4 year olds, tops.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 06:55 PM
1

This event, like so many others, is being politicized by every possible ideological group in existence. I guarantee you can find spin pieces from white supremacists, black supremacists, MGOTW, hell probably even anti-vaxxers, which frames this event in a way that perfectly supports their narrative. Tragedies are always exploited by ideologues and zealots. That's why ideology and zealotry is bad, mmkay?
/r/MensRights15/06/17 06:53 PM
6

Most of the data suggests that women are indeed more likely to perpetrate IPV than men. Lesbian relationships have the highest rates of IPV. The majority of IPV is reciprocal, and in non-reciprocal cases the woman is the perpetrator 70% of the time. Because male-perpetrated IPV results in more cases of serious injury, presumably due to physical strength differences, people just assume that men are more violent than women.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 06:45 PM
8

Erin Pizzey has been saying this for decades. She opened the first women's shelter in the UK and shortly afterward realized that most of the women who came were just as violent as the men they left. Feminists threatened to kill her dog.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 06:39 PM
14

You see, society is so misogynistic that it actually benefits women. Like when you ask KKK members about African Americans, they reply "I think they are so inferior to us whites that I treat them way better than I treat white people." Oh, wait.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 06:37 PM
2

When SJWs and internet feminist celebrities attack something, you know it's good. It's like the best endorsement you can get.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 08:29 PM
-2

This is fucking stupid. Seriously, what the fuck is this shit?
/r/MensRights14/06/17 08:27 PM
2

They don't have any valid criticism so they resort to name calling. It's the same mindset as "everyone who disagrees with me is a Nazi"
/r/MensRights14/06/17 08:26 PM
2

In my experience the MRM is more welcoming to trans rights than the feminist movement, which has an entire subpopulation explicitly devoted to trans hate (TERFs) They think trans women aren't really women because they have male privilege, and trans men are gender traitors and sexual deviants. Being derided, belittled, attacked, and ignored for not being in "the right group" is something both men and trans folk experience at the hands of feminists.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 08:23 PM
1

Why did you delete all of your posts?
/r/MensRights13/06/17 07:37 PM
5

http://nytimes.com/2009/11/22/magazine/22Paternity-t.html It's a long read and I don't see many sources, but I'm trusting that nytimes did their homework. In the meantime I'll try to dig up the study. Of course, the men who take the tests already question their paternity, and for about 30 percent of them, their hunch is right. FWIW the Wikipedia page on paternity fraud lists the same figure.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 07:28 PM
19

By this logic most of my ex girlfriends raped me because I didn't know at the time that they were mentally unstable psychos.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 05:34 PM
24

This is why France bans the practice. It's for "the greater good". Disgusting. If the government was forcing women to raise kids that aren't theirs, we'd see riots in the street.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 05:31 PM
7

IIRC studies that looked at paternity results where the presumed father was already doubting found that about 1/3 of cases confirmed his doubts. So when confirmation bias is in play the stats are even more frightening.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 05:29 PM
10

How? I'm not seeing the relevance. This article was posted in the feminism subreddit and it's currently sitting at a score of 0 with 0 comments. Should I go in there and give them shit for it? Maybe I could say that none of them care about the news because it removed an advantage for women. Then I can feel smug and superior while bolstering my own biases with completely irrelevant strawmen. By the way... I'm curious. Of the subs you moderate, how many banned me because I post here?
/r/MensRights13/06/17 01:50 AM
12

Also, how about a round of applause for Ruth Bader Ginsburg, herself a feminist, who (no surprise) has been fighting for this for a long-ass time? The ruling was simply upholding the 14th amendment. Not sure what RBG's feminism has to do with anything. Are only feminists allowed to uphold the equal protection clause?
/r/MensRights13/06/17 12:31 AM
6

Men are a priority target for SJWs and have been for a while.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 07:52 PM
2

Social Justice Warriors are only motivated by their desire to control others. Control how they dress, eat, speak, where they are allowed to be and where they can go, where they can work, etc, etc. They don't care about equality or solving problems. They just want to make demands and essentially blackmail and threaten until the demands are met.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 07:50 PM
–

Only the perverted family court system in the US could result in a situation where a father can kidnap his own child. I'm going to guess: wife divorced, or they weren't married. Woman makes false allegations of abuse to secure sole custody, father takes kid because he'll likely never see him again. Or mom sues for sole custody because she wants to move a few states away to live with her new boyfriend.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 06:43 PM
6

Don't worry, feminists will be here shortly to explain that this is all due to toxic masculinity and sexism against women.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 06:35 PM
20

Didn't a Muslim woman just commit a terror attack a few days ago?
/r/MensRights11/06/17 06:31 PM
5

Do you know how to write an ellipsis?
/r/MensRights11/06/17 06:29 PM
36

parading_goats is a low effort troll, and I'm pretty sure it's an alt account for cakevodka or missrepresentation, or one of the other dozen low effort trolls in twox. They get banned, run away to TrollX for a while, then return to twox under a new name.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 06:53 PM
5

Feminists literally don't care about MGM. At all. They take an issue that isn't inherently gendered (the mutilation of children's genitals), and intentionally gender it so they can get all the attention and monopolize the discussion. It's the same strategy they used with domestic violence. Marginalizing male victims so women get all the attention is the standard feminist practice.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 08:31 PM
3

Feminists are only concerned about terrorist attacks when they want to use them as excuses to be misandrists.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 07:09 PM
2

Sanchez proudly stated on multiple occasions that white women in tech are problematic. Github made their fucking bed, now they can lay in it.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 10:54 PM
5

Completely agree. That shit belongs in tumblrinaction
/r/MensRights05/06/17 07:47 PM
4

/u/girlwriteswhat thank you for your hard work!
/r/MensRights05/06/17 12:58 AM
3

Looks like it's time for another Title IX suit
/r/MensRights04/06/17 08:42 PM
7

The fatal flaw in feminist thought is the perception that a government headed by mostly men is working toward men's best interests. So they flip it, and say we've got to have more women in government so we can work toward women's interests. But at the end of the day it's all a bunch of money-grubbing psychopaths who don't give a shit about anything but themselves. The same error in perception led women to believe that being a wage slave was somehow a privilege. I'd swap places with my wife in a …
/r/MensRights04/06/17 08:32 PM
1

She also did that one song about eagles.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 08:24 PM
1

I agree with this assessment. Often feminist explanations for men's issues are tantamount to "patriarchy works in mysterious ways". Male privilege is original sin. Since the adoption of Intersectional feminism, whiteness is also original sin. And just like the Indulgences from Christianity's past, feminists in their unbounded grace and mercy offer men the opportunity for absolution and redemption... You just need to give them money! For example the founder of everyday feminism started a course c…
/r/MensRights03/06/17 08:31 PM
2

I signed last week. Please share this around!
/r/MensRights03/06/17 08:24 PM
19

These discussions need to happen from two angles. First, that men can be and are victims of emotional and physical abuse. Second, that women can be and are abusers. It seems that just recently feminist spaces have started to warm up to the first, though they still minimize the effects and downplay the need for action. Male victims of abuse are merely a footnote in the feminist playbook, and mentioned whenever they need to give some lip service to mitigate criticism of the movement. Feminist spac…
/r/MensRights02/06/17 08:02 PM
13

Feminist logic: 5000 men at the very top compared to 700,000 men not getting college degrees = men are privileged and successful, nothing to see here As someone from the UK you should already be aware that suicide is the leading cause of death for men under 50. But keep looking at the board rooms and pretending that men are one homogeneous privileged class. Let's use your logic for a minute: trans women are privileged and discriminating against them is okay because Caitlyn Jenner and Chelsea Man…
/r/MensRights01/06/17 08:26 PM
1

So, what do circumcision and planned parentood have to do with a shortage of qualified applicants in engineering and science industries? Nothing? Okay. Glad we've established that. Again, can you expand upon how the discrimination against men is related to the supply shortage for engineering and science jobs? Give boys the same rights and privileges as girls and we'll have enough engineers to make it so no one has to do dangerous work That's not how this works. That's not how any of this works.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 03:57 AM
2

They also don't compensate for that fact that we aren't meeting demand for some high paying jobs, like engineering and science, because boys are being discriminated against Can you expand upon this?
/r/MensRights31/05/17 02:45 AM
4

A little old: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275574117_Fifty_moves_a_year_Is_there_an_association_between_joint_physical_custody_and_psychosomatic_problems_in_children Recent meta analysis: https://www.statnews.com/2017/05/26/divorce-shared-parenting-children-health/
/r/MensRights30/05/17 04:25 PM
3

The majority of research shows that two are better than one. I don't think the parents' gender affects outcomes that much (if at all). I'd be interested in looking at custody arrangements for divorced gay and lesbian couples. I wonder if they are any different than outcomes for hetero couples... I'm willing to bet there are far more shared custody arrangements.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 03:21 AM
12

Yes, they want to have their cake and eat it too. Adele Guadalupe, a spokeswoman for NOW, said that giving 50% custody to fathers "goes against nature" while protesting a joint custody bill in Florida. Interesting how the largest feminist organization in the US is so eager to perpetuate their evil "patriarchy" when it gives them the upper hand...
/r/MensRights30/05/17 03:17 AM
14

Absolutely correct. The latest research clearly shows that children in shared custody arrangements are better adjusted with fewer behavioral problems and developmental delays. Continuing to push the "primary caregiver" setup is either ignorant or malicious, and I think we all know which.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 03:13 AM
5

But they aren't calling them out, they're asking for money. Edit: I see every article has the "please donate" footer attached. I dunno, the juxtaposition just leaves a bad taste in my mouth.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 10:52 PM
2

Prepare for more bullshit like this. It's the natural result of feminism's ardent campaign to define masculinity as the rejection of femininity, where femininity is all things good and wonderful. It has reached the point where "men" only exist as the opposition of women. Which of course is misogyny, and must be eliminated.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 10:44 PM
2

Intersectional feminism is the most vile, bigoted, and hateful ideology to be taken seriously since eugenics.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 10:40 PM
2

I'd say between 20-30%. Most stats put one in five men as victims of intimate partner violence. I think it's safe to say the occurrence of emotional and verbal abuse is much higher.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 10:37 PM
9

Please don't politicise this tragedy. It was disgusting when feminist tabloids did it, and it's disgusting for "us" to do it.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 10:32 PM
3

Welfare fraud and shoplifting are primarily perpetrated by women. Not really surprising when you consider that women account for over 70% of household spending. This law gives already dishonest women a great opportunity to throw men under the bus in exchange for a free pass. Absolutely disgusting.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 10:28 PM
8

This article touched on many good points. She is exactly right when she says we need to stop talking about girly jobs and manly men. These are good jobs, and are necessary to society. It's time we stop regurgitating the same trite garbage: men would rather starve than do a job deemed "girly" because masculinity is so fragile, but women who don't want to enter male-dominated fields get not only a free pass, but sympathy and support. Society needs to support men who want to enter "girly" jobs. Not…
/r/MensRights29/05/17 10:21 PM
41

Despite all data, feminists like NOW will never stop the lie that primary custody for mom and visitation for dad is "what's best for the children". It's hard to blame them, losing your kids is a tradgedy. But better men than women, right? They won't even entertain shared custody. Dads getting anything more than every-other weekend is apparently misogyny and sexist oppression against women.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 10:00 PM
3

I think most feminists are pretty upset about the mayor's words, because the mayor is a woman. This means they can't be sexist assholes, only racist assholes, which is much harder to do while still patting yourself on the back for being so woke and equal.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 08:12 PM
7

Of course they are. They aren't interested in equality, or the fair treatment of all people. They want the current generation of men and whites to pay for past generations' transgressions. In other words, revenge.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 08:10 PM
10

Looks like the "women are wonderful" effect is pretty deep-rooted.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 03:39 AM
5

Toxic femininity
/r/MensRights29/05/17 03:37 AM
49

I see feminists have finally discovered how to paint women's majority status in higher education as oppression. There's a thread in AskFeminists right now asking why they aren't in STEM. The answers are exactly what you would expect: the honest ones say they aren't interested, the dishonest ones play victim and cry that "society didn't tell me I could study science". One of them said that their parents weren't in STEM, so they didn't know it was an option. How much you want to bet their parents …
/r/MensRights26/05/17 06:56 PM
6

I've had my junk grabbed by random women in bars more times than I'd care to admit. Fuck, I was sexually assaulted by a woman in the school dining hall while eating my lunch. These sexist assholes have a hard enough time admitting that women are even capable of behaving badly, much less admitting that they do.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 06:50 PM
29

The erasure of male spaces while maintaining the (formerly) corresponding female spaces. Feminism is a female supremacy hate group.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 06:47 PM
7

What's concerning is when women refer to wine as "mommy juice".
/r/MensRights26/05/17 06:40 PM
14

Intersectional feminism doesn't make any predictions, it just scrambles to label everything as sexism and oppression. Women receiving lesser sentences? Sexism against women! They call this one "benevolent sexism", in other words even when they are institutionally advantaged they try to cry oppression.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 06:29 PM
8

The two seem to be mutually inclusive
/r/MensRights20/05/17 06:26 PM
1

The glorification of alcohol abuse and domestic violence. This is toxic femininity.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 03:36 PM
10

I've never seen any men's rights groups campaigning to end female genital mutilation. That's because it's already illegal in most nations, and condemned by the UN. Neither of which is the case for the circumcision of newborn boys.
/r/MensRights01/05/17 06:55 PM
6

Feminists may, on occasion, admit that men can be victims. But they will never admit that women can be perpetrators.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 05:30 PM
3

Keep this shit out of here
/r/MensRights30/04/17 05:26 PM
740

"men don't have problems" ... list of problems men face ... "I don't care about men's problems" These college feminists are more malicious than they are stupid. Dangerous combination.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 05:12 PM
1

More of the same drivel coming from feminists: "of course men who experience domestic violence need assistance, but not right now because we are intentionally ignoring them and only focusing on women." And they still don't understand how they are being discriminatory, sexist bigots.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 06:48 PM
2

Ford needs more media appearances like this. The world benefits when she puts the vile and ignorant feminist religion on display for all to see.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 07:28 PM
5

Feminist thought about patriarchy is like the Christian apologetics of old... "How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?" It's all hypothetical, intangible, and unmeasurable. The problem is that these people confuse this shit with reality.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 07:23 PM
10

Feminists have tunnel vision when it comes to the male population, and it's focused directly at the 0.01% of men at the very top. The rest of men either don't exist, or are all violent sexual deviants. But they are never, ever, victims.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 07:19 PM
100

You'd think if we actually lived in a rape culture, then simply being accused of rape without evidence wouldn't be so damaging.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 07:14 PM
2

Universities have been pumping out a steady supply of Marxist and post-structuralist drones. They feel it's their duty to co-op any and all social movements and make them about themselves.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 08:24 PM
3

This is what happens when you mix social justice with taxonomy. It's like a computer stuck in an infinite loop.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 08:21 PM
10

They never learn... By creating labels and categories you're guaranteed to leave people out. If sexuality, gender identity, etc is in fact fluid then what is the point of trying to construct distinct and concrete categories? What was a few years ago "LGBT" is now what, a dozen letters or so? It's like saying there are only seven colors in a rainbow. There's a new proposal to use GSM (gender and sexual minorities) but that is susceptible to the same problem: someone is going to feel left out beca…
/r/MensRights03/04/17 08:16 PM
2

Probably got banned for the first post you linked, which was deleted. I had to go through your post history to read it. It was entirely sensible, accurate, and honest. No wonder it was deleted and earned you a ban.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 04:25 PM
2

Swing and a miss. Funny how obsessed you are with Trump though.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 04:01 PM
2

"everyone I don't like must be a trump supporter" You're a simpleton. Grow up.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 03:38 PM
6

Ahh yes... "God told me to do it" is such a good reason to cut and suck baby dicks.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 07:02 AM
12

Pretending to be a victim is turning out to be a big business. Though, European football taught us this already.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 06:53 AM
1

That guy looks and talks like he sexually harasses women all day. No wonder he wanted to attract more women to his gym. What a loser
/r/MensRights01/04/17 06:49 AM
2

A feminist world view can only be sustained through a persistent silencing of any and all opposing views.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 06:37 AM
0

But that's precisely why trolling them is so fun
/r/MensRights01/04/17 06:35 AM
2

I don't know why demmian still does what he does. His subs have turned into desolate wastelands because he bans Islam apologists (which has become mainstream in feminism). Other feminist havens on Reddit even claim demmian is an MRA because he's banned so many strong independent womyn from /r/feminism and /r/askfeminists. You'd think he'd learn by now, but alas. The guy white knighted for years only to see his fair maidens revolt against him. It would be funny if it weren't so sad.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 06:31 AM
7

Feminism in a nutshell
/r/MensRights01/04/17 06:23 AM
14

Take a break from the internet. You're going through people's posting history and harassing them in other subs. Disconnect for a while. Go outside. Ride a bike or something.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 06:21 AM
2

Man's income takes a dive, wife divorces and takes everything, with a false accusation of abuse to ensure her success. It's a textbook scenario. Shit like this was routine during the recession. Absolutely disgusting. What defense do men have against this? Stay rich, I suppose, but even that's a risk factor too.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 06:02 AM
6

The downside to getting attention is getting unwanted attention. The two are a package deal, unfortunately. The vast majority of men go their entire lives without getting any unsolicited attention from women, and many of those men would be glad to switch places.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 05:56 AM
5

Insecure feminists continue to scapegoat the English language: this and more, tonight at 11
/r/MensRights30/03/17 05:53 AM
10

No, see... Men don't face discrimination therefore that justifies discrimination though it wouldn't technically be discrimination because, as previously asserted, men don't face discrimination. Welcome to the wonky world of social justice, where the terms are made up and definitions don't matter.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 05:49 AM
3

It's not kinda irrelevant, it's kinda the problem. People shouldn't​ comment on things they don't understand, whether it be definition, etymology, etc.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 05:46 AM
11

Pump and dump
/r/MensRights30/03/17 05:42 AM
1

I would if I weren't already donating to my local Humane Society. NCFM needs a new website.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 07:33 PM
8

You say "present data" but link to a 15 year old paper. I mean, I don't disagree with your conclusion but at least offer up that "present data".
/r/MensRights28/03/17 07:29 PM
8

Wouldn't surprise me. Twitter continues to appease SJWs at the expense of their stock price.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 10:15 AM
27

Feminists are pissed that other women have happy families and they are all alone, so they try to ruin it for everyone. Luckily their numbers are thinning because more women are seeing them for the bullshit they really are.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 10:12 AM
3

Fighting imaginary enemies is rather tiring... So much time spent and no progress to show
/r/MensRights25/03/17 10:10 AM
2

Feminism is a shit test, as shown by their incessant perpetuation of bullshit statistics.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 10:07 AM
5

Wrong thread
/r/MensRights24/03/17 08:05 PM
5

Yes, keep your uppity token minorities in line. They'll vote how you say, and that's the end of it! Everyone you don't like is literally racist!
/r/MensRights11/03/17 06:42 PM
2

We've known this for years, but in the US the National Organization for Women fights shared parenting reform in every state. According to them, what's best for the child curiously coincides with what's best for the mother...
/r/MensRights23/02/17 08:50 PM
3

Because the men-pursue-women-choose dynamic is essentially the foundation of a great deal of inequality between the sexes.
/r/MensRights07/01/17 12:25 AM
3

Modern-day feminism is one gigantic shit-test, and too many men are failing.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 10:27 PM
2

Men are only fathers when the mother and the state want his money. If the adoptive parents sued bio dad for child support and won, I would not be the least bit surprised.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 10:06 PM
1

I agree completely, but where we see differences that aren't large enough to warrant a gendered approach, feminists see differences that practically beg for a gendered approach and the erasure of male victims. An abused man in MensLib was banned because he pointed out that feminist-led programs (which are basically the only ones available) treated him as a perpetrator or turned him away. The narrative is very important, and we (Men's Rights Activists) need to stop feminists from saturating publi…
/r/MensRights14/12/16 10:38 PM
20

From the article: “The Australian government funds a number of initiatives to support men and boys who experience violence,” Ryan said, including MensLine Australia and 1800 Respect. Nice... let's check out MensLine Australia: Who we help MensLine Australia is for all men and all types of relationships. In particular it is for: Men who want to better manage a primary relationship difficulty and enhance an existing relationship with their wives, partners, children, work colleagues or anyone else …
/r/MensRights14/12/16 10:31 PM
1

Yes, baby and child abuse is mostly committed by mothers, in part because they spend more time with them. And serious injury as a result of IPV is mostly committed by men, in part because men are physically larger and stronger. If we want to look at only the outcomes and then decide which demographic we want to target, then women need to be taking oaths like the one in TFA to not abuse their children. Instead if we want to look at rates of perpetration, and ignore the severity of the outcome, th…
/r/MensRights14/12/16 10:07 PM
3

Statistically men are more violent than women If you're talking about domestic violence, then you are incorrect. and violent towards women are more serious. This is mostly true. When it comes to serious injury due to IPV, women are more often the victims. Women are more often sexually objected What? and need protection from men No, they don't. For true equality we need to acknowledge gender differences, and hold males accountable for their sex. We need to hold everyone accountable when they abus…
/r/MensRights14/12/16 10:03 PM
1

But, feminists say all the time that "women and children first" isn't actually real. It doesn't happen. Why would feminists need to change their behaviour to correct a problem that doesn't exist? It especially doesn't happen in Canada, where the government accepted women and children refugees from Syria almost exclusively.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 10:22 PM
1

Now we see the results of feminism's relentless barrage of fear, uncertainty, and doubt.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 10:15 PM
6

Yes. Autism is harder to diagnose in girls so the measured ratios of male:female autism incidences range from 2:1 to something like 20:1
/r/MensRights09/12/16 10:12 PM
6

Clearly Boy A was mansplaining and the brave feminist teacher was simply punching up by giving merits to the girl with wrong answers.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 10:10 PM
3

+1 The metric explicitly ignores data when women are advantaged over men. The UN and WHO describes this as a feature, not a bug.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 06:34 PM
29

It's not about women doing no wrong, it's about women always being the primary victims. In the face of a recently growing body of evidence, despite decades of trying to suppress such information, many feminists have no problem now admitting that many men experience domestic violence at the hands of women. However in this case, the feminist response is to look at the outcome: far more women are seriously injured, which is true. However when discussing the discrepancy between male and female suici…
/r/MensRights06/12/16 06:24 PM
2

Well, yes and no. The major chess league / circuit is gender neutral and open to anyone who wants to play chess competitively. Women started their own separate league that is just for girls, because men are sexist pigs and patriarchy and stuff. Or something.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 10:05 PM
12

Women segregate themselves in e-sports, just like they do in other competitive arenas where gender is absolutely irrelevant (like chess).
/r/MensRights21/11/16 04:40 PM
8

Not sure if you're asking sauce for the enrollment demographics or the blockade, so here's both: http://opa.berkeley.edu/uc-berkeley-fall-enrollment-data https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3R6dzZdceT4
/r/MensRights08/11/16 08:38 AM
28

Using their own fucking definition you can show institutionalized sexism and racism against white men at university campuses all over the world. Look at UC Berkeley (white men are less than 20% of the student body) where women and people of color formed a barricade near the entrance of a bridge and forbade white people from passing. Quite literally, the majority was oppressing the minority. Look at alimony: women are the primary earner in nearly 40% of households but men rarely receive spousal s…
/r/MensRights08/11/16 01:14 AM
7

The irony is that generalizing white men is both racist and sexist.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 01:11 AM
21

It's almost as if society has taught women that they have value in being victims... Surely this has nothing to do with feminists' unrelenting barrage of cherry-picked statistics that show that women are like omg the biggest victims ever ughhhhhh patriarchy!
/r/MensRights08/11/16 01:07 AM
2

Let me remind you of what you said: everyone has the right to know who their fucking dad is. Rights are unconditional. Either kids have the right to know their father's identity or they don't. You can't argue against anonymity in the sperm donation process under the premise of "children's right to know" and then argue later that children in fact do not have the right to know under other, far more common, circumstances.
/r/MensRights07/11/16 09:53 PM
8

A spokeswoman for NOW in Florida said, in protest of the last shared parenting reform legislation, that "men are just sperm donors" and that giving men equal custody "goes against nature". Anyone who thinks feminists actually care about equality, or want to dispel the stereotypes that view women as caregivers, is absolutely delusional or at least incredibly ignorant. Feminists pull out the "women are natural caregivers" bullshit every time there's legislation trying to address biased family cour…
/r/MensRights07/11/16 09:42 PM
9

Women fight for primary custody because it's a power play. Even in cases of shared custody, mothers leverage gatekeeping and parental alienation tactics to exert power and control over fathers. The reason why mothers who don't have primary custody are viewed as bad parents is because fathers are viewed as bad parents. How could a good mother leave her children under the terrible care of man?? Look at a popular tactic for getting primary custody: accusing the father of physical and/or sexual assa…
/r/MensRights07/11/16 09:38 PM
3

everyone has the right to know who their fucking dad is. So would you support mandatory paternity testing at birth? Would you support the government coercing women into naming all possible fathers so that they can be tested? If you're actually concerned about kids having the right to know the identity of their fathers, then there are much bigger problems to fix than anonymous sperm donation.
/r/MensRights07/11/16 09:25 PM
1

If this is actually the argument, then the government should enforce paternity testing at birth.
/r/MensRights07/11/16 09:23 PM
2

I'm sure they would consider that to be some sort of misogynistic sexual assault. The reason for the erosion of anonymity is because they want consequence-free decision making. If being a single mom doesn't turn out to be rainbows and puppy dogs, they want the option to go after the father for money. They also want to make sure they aren't using sperm from perceived low-value men. Because that is also misogyny.
/r/MensRights07/11/16 09:18 PM
1

The egov pdf is investigating links between interracial inequality and crime rates. The second one looks straight at income and crime, comparing race. The third one is perhaps the most interesting. It tries to look at hypothetical Hispanic and Black crime rates if they were as economically privileged as Whites.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 10:51 PM
1

http://egov.ufsc.br/portal/sites/default/files/anexos/33027-41458-1-PB.pdf http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs12552-016-9164-y http://www.rci.rutgers.edu/~japhill/sp802.pdf Your turn.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 10:39 PM
58

Toxic femininity
/r/MensRights17/10/16 07:18 PM
1

Black on black crime is as high as any white neighborhood with similar poverty rates Can you provide some evidence to back this up? Because everything I've seen shows that this is not the case at all.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 07:17 PM
5

The sad part is you'll probably have a better chance of getting this shit torn down if you complain about cultural appropriation rather than the denigration and vilification of half the population.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 07:15 PM
9

Yeah, she made that shit up. Just like when she landed in Bosnia under active sniper fire. She's a psychopath and you really can't believe anything she says.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 04:15 PM
2

Feminists use the position of bodily autonomy to defend abortion, but it's trivial to show that what they actually care about is ending parental responsibilities. It's simple: just bring up hypothetical artificial wombs. Once abortion does not terminate the fetus, only the pregnancy, they moan and complain that women shouldn't be forced into raising a child if they don't want to. In fact there's a thread over at askfeminists showing exactly this. It's hilarious.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 06:28 PM
2

Continuing to engage in sexual acts with someone who is incredibly intoxicated and passing out is most definitely rape.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 08:21 PM
11

Surely she will be charged with assault, now that this video evidence has contradicted her story?
/r/MensRights16/08/16 09:24 PM
4

You'll never find a feminist arguing that consent to sex is consent to parent a child, unless they are talking about men's reproductive rights.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 06:43 PM
3

To them, abolishing gender means extermination or the complete subservience of men.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 04:27 PM
2

(Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 protects women and girls from discrimination on the basis of sex in education programs or activities that receive federal funding.) Feminists show their true colors by intentionally lying and misrepresenting the law. It protects everyone from discrimination in education. WoLF, and other feminist groups whining about the "misuse" of Title IX, are female supremacy organisations and should be labelled as hate groups.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 04:23 PM
3

It's odd that the college students sitting in the ivory towers of academia, who are chanting for this sacrifice, are completely unwilling to give up their own privileged positions.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 05:47 PM
7

The majority of slut-shaming women receive on twitter comes from women as well. But don't worry, feminists were quick to remind us that women have no real agency and no responsibility for their actions. They were just brainwashed by patriarchy.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 05:45 PM
2

Only a college student would think that the solution to patriarchal oppression is gender segregation, instead of giving up their sexist Iron-age religious beliefs. Patriarchy and internalized misogyny are alive and well in Islam, but feminists dare not say an unkind word about it.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 05:36 PM
37

inviting men to help occupy the lounge would seemingly violate the spirit of the very thing they're protesting for - a women only space. The irony is most definitely lost on these male allies. The Left of old coined an apt term for these people - useful idiots.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 05:03 PM
16

Perhaps we should be using the same arguments that were used against men's only institutions and launch them at the women's only institutions. If they continue to support women's only institutions, they are showing their sexist hypocrisy for all to see. That's exactly what is happening here. Title IX was used to end a discriminatory space and now feminists are furious.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 04:57 PM
10

But the whole school is a men's lounge! Never mind that women are a majority in universities. They need more special treatment.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 04:56 PM
51

When I read about these progressives upset about Title IX being used to stop discrimination against men, it reminds me of when the religious right passed laws allowing government monies to support religious schools and then flipped out when they saw that some money went to non-Christian schools. If real equality was an undesirable consequence of your actions, you're just a bigot.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 04:53 PM
1

Feminism is a religion and as such it has a set of core tenets which serve as the foundation for its ideology. Free speech is not one of those tenets.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 05:27 PM
3

the number one predictor of whether a woman will be the victim of domestic violence is, whether she is a perpetrator of domestic violence. Considering that the majority of IPV is reciprocal, this shouldn't come as a surprise. The really interesting part is when you consider that the majority of perpetrators in non-reciprocal IPV are women. It's pretty simple to build a narrative around men fighting back against violent women, but due to large disparities in strength, women are more prone to seri…
/r/MensRights02/08/16 07:53 PM
1

This is a terrible analogy. The issue is when you take something that affects everyone, and only focus on a particular subset of victims. It's not productive and only exists to bold the lines that separate us as humans.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 07:50 PM
3

You could be replaced by a bot... all you do is spam this same sentence.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 07:47 PM
3

Didn't they try to kill her dog? Like, how the fuck is that your response to being told that women are just as violent as men?
/r/MensRights02/08/16 01:22 AM
17

They really ought to find a gay male student to sue for access. He has needs, too! When faced with someone claiming Victim status, always look for someone with greater Victim status. Some very sage advice from Kevin M back in 2013.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 11:17 PM
13

Saying you feel specifically safe in one place doesn't mean they feel like they're literally going to be raped the moment they step out the door. They aren't saying they feel specifically safe in one place. They are saying they only feel safe in one location. This implies they do not feel safe in any other location. think it's funny to mock treating trans or fat people like other human beings Just an FYI the Trans in my name does not refer to transsexual folk. It refers to trans-fats.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 08:26 PM
15

Is this what you honestly think she meant? Yes, and that view is echoed both in the comments and in the linked petition [emphasis retained]: The lounge was a space where sexual assault victims could go and feel safe, a space away from their attacker. Now our lounge, the only room on campus where women could relax and just be around other women, is being taken away.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 08:08 PM
28

It's a veritable goldmine. Don't get rid of women's only spaces unless you can get rid of men's violence first! Women need segregated spaces because rape. We're supposed to accept men into our spaces and our bodies whenever they see fit. Eliminating a segregated space from campus is literally rape. So they're going to "design" for "inclusion" in things like being able to walk across campus or go to a social gathering without being harassed or raped? I can't even walk across campus without being …
/r/MensRights01/08/16 07:40 PM
2

LA LA LA I CAN'T HEAR YOU Great rebuttal
/r/MensRights01/08/16 07:26 PM
6

WE ARE DOING IT FOR THE TRANS FATS IT'S ABOUT TIME
/r/MensRights01/08/16 07:24 PM
62

For more lulz and/or rage, check out feminist current's take on this event. The fact that feminists are so miffed about this beautifully elucidates their underlying position of superiority over equality. One bit I like: if men didn’t choose to rape, harass, belittle, intimidate, and generally terrorize women, there would be no need for the MSU women’s lounge. So, what she's saying here is that the campus majority (women) has only one place on campus where they can avoid getting raped. With the W…
/r/MensRights01/08/16 07:14 PM
23

Explanations are given in some other articles about this. There's a particularly great rationale given by Feminist Current, which is that women deserve their own segregated space because they can't even walk across campus without getting raped by men.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 07:08 PM
20

I was browsing the site out of curiosity and found a section with this title: Stopping Abusive Behavior – Not Just for Men Nice! Okay, maybe they'll refer to a program for abusive women? Let's read on... Stop Hurting the Woman You Love isn’t just for the man who thinks he might be abusive. It can help the woman who’s been hurt... Nope.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 05:32 PM
2

Paternity testing can not prove faithfulness. It can only prove paternity.
/r/MensRights30/07/16 09:55 PM
2

When has any feminist organization or publication discussed the Dangerous Work Gap and suggested that it needed fixing?
/r/MensRights30/07/16 09:47 PM
1

Feminism, much like other religions, turns to the refuge of philosophy when pressed to offer up evidence. An overarching oppressive patriarchal force is an extraordinary claim that needs extraordinary evidence. But we can't even get ordinary evidence. To date, the only major tangible application of feminist theory was the Duluth Model, a method of handling DV that assumes patriarchal cause. It failed, miserably.
/r/MensRights30/07/16 09:33 PM
4

Is this one of those things where no matter what studies say the results will always point to sexism against girls? Yes. Women are always the victims and every situation must be viewed through that lens. It's exactly the same type of presuppositional nonsense that religious folk spew: "If you just start with the belief that god exists then it's easy to see how everything proves he exists!" Just another parallel between feminism and religion.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 06:05 PM
17

I love it... women get a special section of the publication so they can talk about how they treat men and boys poorly.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 04:31 PM
10

CHS is wonderful.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 04:20 PM
2

"There is compelling evidence that male circumcision reduces the risk of heterosexually acquired HIV infection in men by approximately 60%." Condoms are more effective. This line of reasoning makes absolutely zero sense and is only peddled so advocates of circumcision have something to tout.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 11:22 PM
5

I wonder if this qualifies as the 'power' that, when added to prejudice, equals sexism? I mean, according to even the most pedantic feminist definition, the DNC is a sexist organization.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 11:12 PM
8

One of the more recent additions to the mod team had to return back to the pit of misandry from whence she came, i.e., femmethoughts, where she continues to disparage half the population (technically the minority) under the pretense of women's liberation. Just shows how perverse, disingenuous, and outright dangerous the approach taken by menslib. It's half self-flagellation and half subservience and prostration at the feet of feminism. Basically the definition of sado-masochism.
/r/MensRights24/07/16 08:30 PM
16

A feminist told me that bringing women up wouldn't involve taking men down. So clearly this didn't actually happen
/r/MensRights22/07/16 09:34 PM
1

Maybe feminism is a shit test Ding ding. Feminism isn't about true fear or oppression, it's about condensing perceived slights into power... an inversion of control. This is why feminists are tripping over themselves to not offend the most misogynistic and patriarchal asswipes on the face of the Earth. Because Muslims are realllly low on the privilege totem pole.
/r/MensRights16/07/16 05:52 PM
59

Gay men are fashion accessories to women. It's disgusting. Every gay bar around here is overrun with party girls who think every male patron is just dying to be their gay sidekick.
/r/MensRights16/07/16 05:39 PM
24

I need to read this study through a feminist lens so I can understand how this actually demonstrates women's oppression at the hands of the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights16/07/16 05:38 PM
0

Well, tough shit. If they want to suck off the foreskin of infant boys then they can move to Israel.
/r/MensRights15/07/16 07:35 PM
1

BLM was co-opted by feminists with the intention of erasing male victims so black women could claim oppression again.
/r/MensRights12/07/16 05:20 PM
1

Wow, three big wins for children.
/r/MensRights02/07/16 09:25 PM
1

Lol that's a great video. I just subscribed. Not sure why it's posted in here though...
/r/MensRights02/07/16 09:23 PM
8

At first I thought she was on meth and PCP but then I saw that it was just feminism.
/r/MensRights02/07/16 09:09 PM
3

The perpetual victim worldview is so powerful that feminists are eating their own.
/r/MensRights02/07/16 08:59 PM
6

Men don't get that choice but feminists blame that on patriarchy, which is bullshit since it's the wife who drives that dynamic, not society. The only person who stopped me from being a SAHD was my wife. Because she wanted to be a SAHM. Because feminism is about empowering women to do what they want, at the literal expense of everyone around them. Men only exist to subsidize women's choices.
/r/MensRights02/07/16 08:52 PM
–

My wife was pro equality before she got pregnant. After she got pregnant, she starting talking about staying at home for 5-10 years to be with the kids. A complete reversal. But now the children are real and there's nothing I can do about it. Now I have to work twice as hard because she cut our income in half, and I barely see my kids. If we divorce I'll see my kids even less, but her position barely changes. I still gotta work my ass off and pay her for sitting at home all day. She knows she ho…
/r/MensRights02/07/16 08:42 PM
7

Considering it's the woman who experiences all the hassle of pregnancy and birth, and it's the woman who has the food-supply on her chest, I wonder why it's the woman who usually stays home! Stays home for 15 years? Yeah, no. She can get a job.
/r/MensRights02/07/16 08:33 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter