TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TransportationLow564 Archive

View 0 posts and 90 comments by TransportationLow564 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

A post not kowtowing to women, so of course it's got zero upvotes, LoL.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 05:58 PM
–

"People like who they like at the end of the day." Yet you seem AWFULLY bothered by men liking women who don't like them back. " I'm talking about the lonely incels who won't go to the gym, groom themselves ... " And you know they don't go to the gym... how, exactly? For that matter, how are you able to comment on the grooming of guys you're talking to on an online forum, LoL? Because you saw one fat guy walking around in a stained t-shirt, and now you assume any guy online who says something yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 08:55 PM
–

How do you know the people complaining "aren't doing anything to fix it?" Saying that implies that effort (or lack thereof) is the real issue, yet a big guy (for instance) could be eating nothing ɓut salads and working out every day, and all that work will mean absolutely nothing to the world at large until results become visible. The value is placed on how he looks, NOT how hard he works or the amount of effort he puts in. Weaselly statements like this reinforce the (BS) narrative that big dude…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 08:51 PM
–

This is a tired argument, LoL. But for what it's worth, I'd argue that it goes both ways. Are both men and women who aren't conventionally attractive less likely to get picked (especially in an online forum, where things are demonstrably even more shallow and looks-focused than in real life)? Yes. I don't think anyone who's being intellectually honest would deny that. But men being shallow doesn't justify women being so (or vice-versa). You're complaining about men complaining about women being …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 08:30 PM
0

even the unattractive loser who is too pussy to talk to women Don't modern women think this describes pretty much all rapists?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/26 04:41 AM
0

WOMEN: Imma wait til I'm 40 to settle down. 40something Men: Goin' after those twenty and thirtysomething chicks. WOMEN: Groomers! Pedophiles!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 10:10 PM
27

Yes, yes, my heart breaks for the beautiful women and rich folks of society. It's HARD being universally valued, people!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 10:05 PM
1

Ugh. Bored now.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 09:42 PM
–

So everybody needs to become a body language expert before approaching someone? You're grasping at straws now.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 09:29 PM
3

There's PLENTY of women out there complaining about being approached in bars and night clubs. ("I just wanna dance!" "I'm out with my friends," etc.) Clearly following someone who's trying to walk away, etc. is out of bounds, but if people want that to stop, they should call THAT out. Not act like approaching itself is the problem. Zero in on the actual inappropriate behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 07:08 PM
2

that sub (as in, the sugarlifestyle sub, LoL) I agree that's the point. It just surprises me how in denial actual sugar folks seem to be about that fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 06:17 PM
–

"Sugar Daddy is a transactional arrangement." Not according to the folks on that sub, LoL. They swear they're all looking for "genuine connection" with financial support as an added benefit. (Translation: "I wanna be paid for existing and not have to compromise anything.")
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 06:07 PM
–

When is it appropriate? When the woman is attracted to you. Most discourse around this subject is not so subtly aimed, above all, at encouraging unattractive men to select themselves out before approaching. Women need to learn that if they want a hot guy to ask them out at the gym (the grocery, wherever), that means that sometimes men who AREN'T that hot are going to ask them out at the gym. If they want a guy to ask them out at the gym when they're feeling sociable and open to engaging, that me…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 06:03 PM
–

If his first point wasn't accurate there wouldn't be a million women on Instagram looking for sugar daddies.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 05:52 PM
0

Yep, that's always the first line on every woman's dating profile. "I want a guy with a good personality who reads books." Explains all the chicks married to illiterate rageaholics who beat them.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 05:49 PM
1

"Besides all the dark traits a woman can make ends up with women somehow..." Is that English? In a world where most people meet online, and anyone who doesn't look perfect gets swiped on by, looks are gonna be the biggest indicator as to whether someone is going to have a hard time finding a partner, hands down. People don't like to admit this because it makes them look shallow, but it is what it is. As a result, many women don't feel like they can just say, "I'm not interested in that guy becau…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 05:46 PM
2

Firstly, thanks for writing this. Secondly -- and to prove your point -- if a guy had written this post, I somehow doubt it would have received any positive number of upvotes, let alone 67 (by this count). As you say, to conservatives asking for help implies weakness. (Or worse yet -- GASP!!! -- femininity.) Progressives, on the other hand, seem to believe IN THEORY that men reaching out for help is a good thing. But when men actually imply that they need said help, they receive naught but sneer…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 12:07 AM
–

Eh... men were asking the big questions. Women just complain about how men mistreat them. Which has in turn led to the manosphere movement of men complaining about how women mistreat them (and/or cause them to be mistreated). No one's asking big question from a bird's eye view... what is good, what is justice, how ought one to live, etc. Instead everyone's focused on addressing perceived injustices. There's no philosophy anymore, just identity politics.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/26 09:19 PM
1

Women are making better choices to get knocked up by the same 20 percent of guys, then marry a loser to help raise them, LoL.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 07:07 PM
0

Even in Biblical times, men couldn't keep their women in line.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 07:06 PM
–

I mean, I'm not a big 'patriarchy' guy, but I think the sort of thing you're talking about (society not caring about how men feel / being uncomfortable when men show emotion, vulnerable or otherwise) is exactly what people are talking about when they talk about patriarchy. What they miss is that men and women, liberals and conservatives, etc. ALL feed into this unhealthy conditioning, even as libs pretend to oppose it (while telling guys who are hurting to 'man up') and conservatives pretend it …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 11:16 PM
–

I absolutely don't agree with men "simping" or being lapdogs for attractive women. No one deserves to be put on a pedestal and worshipped. That said, a lot of the same women who decry this, also berate men for pursuing women who are "out of their league," implying that "ugly people should stick with their own kind" or somesuch. So essentially, they're putting these women on a pedestal and placing them "above" the men who worship them, every bit as much as the men themselves are doing. I find tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 01:15 AM
1

Supporters may argue that promoting the nuclear family is not inherently anti-LGBTQ+ I'd agree with this if not for the ones promoting it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 12:41 AM
2

I honestly think there are more men who'd rather be relieved of the burden of having to pursue a woman, be a provider, support a family, etc. than women who are actually willing to give up their advantages under patriarchy (i.e., not having to pursue or initiate relationships or be breadwinners). Should women be denied jobs or promotions because of their sex, or be shamed for working outside the home? Of course not. But working in higher education, I've seen a LOT of very liberal professional wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 12:38 AM
–

Women really HATE dudes seeing through their bullshit, LoL. The copium on display here is incredible.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 12:32 AM
1

It's worth noting that (some) women and White Knight types perpetuate this kind of thinking as well. Approach a woman at a club? "She just wants to hang out with her friends!" Approach a woman where she works? "She doesn't have the choice not to engage... you're basically kidnapping her!" Approach a woman on the street / at the library / at the grocery store, wherever? "Creepy!" I agree, though, that the folks who perpetuate most of this crap are mostly ultra liberal / terminally online types. Y…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 09:00 PM
2

What gets me is like... a guy called Beau of the Fifth Column on YouTube did what I think is probably the best, most open-minded and compassionate video about incels, where he basically said, these guys fall into three different categories: 1) Guys who are ugly. 2) Guys who "look normal," but have a mental health issue or something that renders them undateable. (He uses the example of someone with Tourette's... doesn't matter if you look like a supermodel, if you walk around shouting obscenities…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 12:59 AM
–

Which is what leads to the narrative that "most men" aren't suitable because they're creepy, or just want sex, or don't bother to shower regularly or wear clean clothes, etc. God forbid you just say "if they're not attractive, I'm not interested;" they have to make it out that the men they reject are actually "bad people" in some way.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/26 10:54 PM
–

Read the title of the post, LoL. It's about performative progressivism, but randos are using it as their usual soapbox to claim that dudes who have bad luck with women just need to take a shower or whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 08:34 PM
–

Geez. Can't imagine how you "progressive" types must feel about gay or trans people.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 07:16 PM
–

Relevance? OP is talking about women not wanting to date a feminine man (despite supposedly holding progressive views about gender roles), but folks are dunking on him for supposedly being "gross" and/or not taking enough care with his appearance. Seems to be a disconnect there.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 07:14 PM
–

Does being feminine (for a dude) necessarily equate to being "gross?"
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 06:48 PM
79

I truly feel bad for Gen Z. Between the (even more looks-weighted) proliferation of online dating, their general (at least stereotypical) lack of face to face social skills, and the constant messaging they get about how it's basically NEVER okay to approach a woman in any in-person setting (at work, in a bar, at a club, etc.), I don't know how they ever manage to meet anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 06:25 PM
–

I'm sure there'd be plenty of delicious Eastern European women willing to lure him to a hotel and steal his kidney.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 06:19 PM
1

'Work on yourself' and 'dress well' aren't bad. Better than the collossally unhelpful 'just be yourself' and 'your time will come' that a lot of guys grew up with.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 09:56 PM
–

one of this precludes anyone from relationships. It probably takes extra work Nah... some guys are just fucked, whether because of a combination of these factors or whatever else. If they sit back and decry their lousy lot in life, people will accuse them of being lazy / not trying hard enough. If they DO try, people will say they're trying too hard / acting desperate. No matter how hard they try (or not), they will not have success, and society will go on pretending there's some magical right a…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 05:22 AM
1

Word salad.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 05:04 AM
2

The sad thing about the big girls and single moms is that, in reality, attractive, young, childless women hold them in FAR more contempt than most men do. At worst, men simply fail to pay these women their due attention, or consider them seriously enough as potential romantic partners, or whatever. Other women are ACTIVELY CAMPAIGNING for men they're not interested in -- men they view as beneath contempt -- to pair up with these women. Hot chicks are essentially trying to use these poor chubby w…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 04:20 AM
–

Some men lack the physical appearance, social skills, etc. to date successfully. Some such men have been known to complain about their sorry lot in life. At this point people NOT in said sorry situation have a couple of options: They can commisserate. "I'm sorry, man. You got a raw deal. There's nothing I can do to help, but I feel for ya." This might make them feel bad, however, so instead most choose to denigrate such men, dismissing their concerns by arguing that they, and they alone (not bad…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 04:10 AM
–

Remember men... any problems you have are YOUR OWN DAMN FAULT.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 04:00 AM
–

Nah. guys who get laid tend to do so pretty effortlessly. The hoop-jumpers go home dry.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 05:31 AM
2

Honestly this sub should be called "Red vs. Blue," not Purple.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 05:22 PM
1

Next you're gonna tell she's not really busy "washing her hair" every Friday.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 10:52 PM
4

More the guy who thinks the stripper SHOULD like him, and can't believe how short-sighted she's being by ignoring his constant texts. The rub, of course, being that, by his own admission, he's gonna keep on simping regardless of whether she replies to him or not. She's ignoring him because she has no incentive to do otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 10:50 PM
1

You know, I couldn't agree more. Looking for "connection" in a scenario like this is a fool's errand... OF is for buying content, period. That's the only thing it should be used for and the only expectation anyone using it should have.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 10:48 PM
22

I think TRP can be useful to men, insofar as it may teach them some basic truisms that have the POTENTIAL to improve their lives / their relations with women. (Be good-looking, successful, etc., and if you're lacking in one area try and make up for it by improving in the other.) I think TRP is actually pretty spot-on in terms of how attraction works, even in some cases the uglier parts of it, and if absorbing those lessons helps a guy make improvements and have more success... great! I think whe…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 02:25 AM
0

OP clearly doesn't like gays, and really, REALLY wants us to know that most of the world supposedly agrees with him.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 08:52 PM
–

I'd push back on whether "the vast majority of the human population" has a negative view on homosexuality, but in the sort of context you're talking about -- women snarkily insinuating that a man might be gay because he is critical of women -- I'd say I agree with your main point.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 08:45 PM
–

*woman ineffectually attempts to fight off mugger by hitting him with purse*
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 05:02 PM
29

Men who are devoted to their purpose and their mission This is code for "they have money."
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 01:34 AM
3

You can't call Oprah. You have to have your people call her people.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 07:01 PM
–

Politically incorrect. Masculinity is toxic and femininity is yaaaaaaasssss queen! Oprah tells us so.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 06:48 PM
2

I prefer average, personally. Pro tip: dudes' definition of "tall" almost always equates to "not short."
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 04:59 PM
26

I think there's something to be said for the idea that the MPDG is also, typically, a VERY conventionally attractive young woman whose looks or personal style are JUST offbeat enough to make your average Jay Baruchel-type feel like he might have a chance with her. No, skinny nerdy guys, a supermodel is NOT going to fall in love with you just because she happens to have pink hair or favor 60s-style hippie fashion or whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 04:57 PM
2

I always thought the female equivalent to the "manic pixie dream girl" was the hot, mysterious, dangerous guy who's also caring and devoted.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 04:53 PM
-2

Women want to BE ABLE to get a job. They're in no hurry to HAVE to get a job.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 04:50 PM
1

unpaid labor I assume you're talking about sitting at home and watching soaps?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 06:57 PM
2

I don't agree with this from a "female friends are no good" perspective, but rather from the point of view that I think interacting with a lot of women in a context where you have to suppress / not show your attraction to them, can sort of put you in the headspace of not being comfortable expressing those kind of feelings in general. You can essentially train yourself to be sort of sex/flirtation-neutral around women, which can lead to, for instance, not making your feelings known to a woman who…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 02:15 AM
–

If instead of force you use the overwhelming majority of people on your side to fully socially ostracize the people that don't conform You think forcing women to marry men against their will under threat of social ostracism is a good thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 01:23 AM
2

Manosphere types and the like have convinced a small minority of undateable men -- say .5 percent of the total population -- that in fact they're part of a silently suffering majority. That all the women are going after the top ten percent of guys (or whatever it is), when plainly that can't be the case, as if it was 90 percent of men would be partnerless and ten percent would have a literal harem of girlfriends / wives.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 10:56 PM
–

Let's talk about what we're really talking about here. If you're fat, ugly, whatever (and I'm all three), you're fucked (or rather not), whether you're talking to women online, on a dating app, in the real world, whatever. It's been shown that in a dating app scenario, though, women categorize something like 90 percent of men as "below average." So that means there are plenty of guys out there who are perfectly good-to-average-looking, who aren't getting any play on the apps, who probably WOULD,…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 10:53 PM
–

This is one of those "pretending the world is the way it should be rather than the way it is" sort of things. There are plenty of men who want sex and plenty of women who are willing to provide it (for a price). In theory, assuming certain health-related safeguards are observed, I don't think there's anything wrong with that. And yet, the stigma remains: because our entire culture romanticizes sex on one hand while demonizing it on the other; because it's been illegal for so long that it's hard …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 09:28 PM
0

If you mean she can sell sex for money She can sell the distant promise of maybe one day sex for more money.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 08:40 PM
1

I mean, not everyone's a Bond villain. And I'd say not having to pay for shit ever is a pretty big leg up in life.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 08:25 PM
1

The guys you're asking just aren't ugly enough. Or you're not cute.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 08:24 PM
2

Most of #metoo was basically women confessing that they used their sexuality to get what they want from powerful men I think that's a bit much. It's one thing to sleep with someone for a part (or whatever) and then cry foul later. It's another to be hounded and threatened the way, for instance, Harvey Weinstein was known to do. (Or just flat-out assaulted, as in the case of Rose McGowan.)
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 08:21 PM
1

If they are having sex with her, then isn’t her power gone? Her power is definitely at its height with regard to A) Wealthy/older/unattractive men who don't want her to turn off the spigot, and B) Men who want her, aren't getting any, but continue to live in hope. Make no mistake -- a wealthy guy has the power to move on to a new sugar baby / trophy wife if the current one's not giving him what he wants. But there's probably another one waiting in the wings to be strung along for a while.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 08:18 PM
1

Nope.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 08:18 PM
0

If they are having sex with her, then isn’t her power gone? Her power is definitely at its height with regard to A) Wealthy/older/unattractive men who don't want her to turn off the spigot, and B) Men who want her, aren't getting any, but continue to live in hope. Make no mistake -- a wealthy guy has the power to move on to a new sugar baby / trophy wife if the current one's not giving him what he wants. But there's probably another one waiting in the wings to be strung along for a while.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 08:18 PM
–

Let me rephrase. Enough men will be willing to do whatever you want as to make no difference. Need a ride, a meal, your car fixed, your rent paid? You can prolly find some chump to do it. Is that same chump gonna stay on the hook forever? Nah, eventually he'll move along and get taken advantage of by someone else. But there's always another two or three waiting in the wings.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 08:14 PM
1

The age range young women are willing to date is around 2x wider. And tends to get exponentially wider the more money / status is involved.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 08:01 PM
–

If you are hot and can get laid…. you’re hot and can get laid. That’s about the only benefit that comes from it. Except being able to get guys to do whatever you want? I feel like some folks in this thread are being kind of deliberately obtuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 07:58 PM
–

Never having to buy your own drink/dinner?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 07:56 PM
1

Chiming in super late to say: I think either is fine as long as both sides are upfront and open about what they're looking for. A man shouldn't pretend to be interested in a relationship in order to get a woman to have sex with him, if in fact he is only interested in casual sex. A woman shouldn't pretend to be interested in a relationship in order to get a man to spend money on her, if in fact she is only interested in being wined and dined. Assuming that not everyone is going to have an open a…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 05:49 PM
0

you don't see women with inconvenient, unpopular beliefs because we get our comments deleted and banned from the subreddit for sharing them Are you saying that contrarian opinions from women will be deleted and those from men won't? Also, I thought he was speaking more generally (like, he doesn't notice women taking contrarian opinions even in real-life / in-person settings, not just online). Which seems pretty natural to me, as women have always sort of had a reputation of being "relationship m…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 05:17 PM
2

Wouldn't most of what OP is saying here be considered "Red Pill" sorts of ideas? I thought Purple Pill was supposed to strive for a kind of reasonable middle ground between Red and Blue.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 05:10 PM
29

boys are more likely to be kinaesthetic learners but all learning is everyone sat behind a desk Hasn't school always been like that though? Why are we seeing deleterious effects specifically now?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 09:29 PM
2

Brought to you by the writers at Hallmark, LoL.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 07:21 PM
1

This is nonsense. In reality, most men have perfectly good / acceptable relationships with women (and vice-versa). A small but vocal subset of men have problems -- vocal both in the sense that they carry on a lot online, as well as in the sense that the media and other factions on the internet belly-ache about them constantly. All of which adds up to making the problem seem worse than what it is. Most men aren't incels or redpillers. Most incels or redpillers don't pose a danger to society. You …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 04:31 PM
–

Even if it's true that telling someone they can't have an abortion is equivalent to telling them they can't have sex (which it isn't), that's still not equivalent to women's views (according to your post title) on the plight of incels. In your own words, women are saying they have no sympathy for men who are unable to have sex, not telling them they're not allowed to have it. Individual women may be telling them the latter, but women as a class are not.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 11:33 PM
–

A more elaborate presentation of this idea might be, "Women don't care if men can get sex, even though there might be very real social and emotional consequences; men don't care if women can get abortions, even though..." and that's where the disconnect comes in, because you're dealing with a lot more than social and emotional consequences in the latter case. There's also (physical) health risks involved, legal ramifications that will last at least until the child reaches the age of 18 (assuming…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 09:56 PM
1

Opposite of divorce: choosing to stay in a lifelong relationship with someone you don't love / who doesn't love you.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 09:43 PM
24

This is an astoundingly nonsensical analogy.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 09:26 PM
1

One of the effects is that women are increasingly marrying men with less education Women with master's degrees and above, in my experience, come in two varieties (with respect to the sort of men they date): Those married to/dating other professors; and Those married to/dating less educated men who nonetheless make more money.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 07:20 PM
1

IF.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 07:16 PM
1

Those women will get jobs, marry their bosses and then start staying home.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 07:16 PM
4

It's anyone's prerogative to be comfortable (or not) with whatever, and to express those feelings to their significant other. It's no one's prerogative to tell their significant other what they can and can't do. Your boyfriend / girlfriend is not your parent or your boss.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 07:05 PM
2

Maybe if there had been no romantic interest then they wouldn't have interacted in the first place? Precisely. Attraction on one side or the other -- or even both sides -- is not a good foundation for friendship. Common interests and compatible personalities are. These things can also enhance a romantic relationship, of course (one of many things that can muddy the waters... many things make for a good friendship OR a good romantic relationship, but also many things conflict with each other).
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 02:49 PM
7

If it's a genuine friendship, the benefits are the same as any other friendship: someone to spend time with, share activities with, turn to in times of trouble, enjoy discussing common interests with, and so on. If it's a "friendship" based on one person having romantic feelings for the other and hanging around hoping to one day get their shot... well, that's not a genuine friendship, and even if it does offer some of the benefits above, the frustration of one's romantic feelings going unfulfill…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 09:31 PM
1

There are boundaries you have to observe in a friendship (or any sort of non-romantic, non-sexual relationship) with a woman that, if you follow those rules when interacting with a woman you're romantically interested in, will be counterproductive and lead to you getting "friend zoned." (Do people still use that expression?) Basically, if a woman's not into you, or if the relationship between you is such that it wouldn't be appropriate for either one of you to show interest in the other, then fl…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 09:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter