TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Trebbers Archive

View 0 posts and 41 comments by Trebbers on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

Fantastic concern trolling.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 03:49 AM
0

I must? My goodness, what a little leap of logic you got there. Adorably undereducated!
/r/MensRights29/12/14 06:33 PM
-1

Just because you are the same mental age as the girls you want to get with doesn't mean society should make it legal. Have some class.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 03:17 AM
-1

A person who wants to fuck little kids and believes in shitbrained conspiracy theories? Guess I needed to make that more obvious.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 03:12 AM
0

The feminists have keep moral outrage fixated on this because its how they maintain their cartel on sex and continue producing women who enroll in college and take women's studies. That is an insanely simple-minded conspiracy theory you have there. If the laws were altered to make sex between sexually mature but legally underage teenage women and adult men legal, feminism would collapse almost instantly. Pedophilia is a pretty shitty thing, being able to determine if someone is sexually mature w…
/r/MensRights29/12/14 03:08 AM
-1

Stick to r/theredpill, stay out of here.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 03:02 AM
2

This has nothing to do with mensrights.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 02:30 AM
1

I have been trying to get you to answer a question The second one is a statement which is non insulting. I'll ask this once and I'll just move on if you try to be intellectually dishonest anymore: Do you think that the language you initially used when describing men is anywhere near as politically correct/ less incendiary than the statement I just made? You are ignoring it because it fucks your argument even more than it is now. I'm going to go ahead and make good on my promise to duck out due t…
/r/MensRights23/12/14 07:19 AM
1

Are you really implying that you're 100% totally right about everything? Strawmans as far as the eye can see.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 07:16 AM
1

So if I am factually correct that makes me non well-researched? You got me good. edit: Your lack of ability is astonishing.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 07:14 AM
1

A common tactic used by the intellectually dishonest in an argument is to call an end to the argument when backed against a wall, pretending the argument is not worth it anymore/ trying to divert focus from the question they cannot answer. And yet you still deflect so you do not need to answer the question. Fascinating. The second one is a statement which is non insulting. I'll ask this once and I'll just move on if you try to be intellectually dishonest anymore: Do you think that the language y…
/r/MensRights23/12/14 06:59 AM
1

Yes, I was a jerk but real talk: you say a meeting between two groups would be silly, take two seconds to google it to see if it happened. Again, I did not say it did not happen. I said a truce would be silly. Truce and meeting are two different words with different meetings. Hell, even if I said meeting (which you continually pretend I did) I would not be incorrect. Also, I took your meaning to be "so silly that they wouldn't even consider it". Arguing against unspoken assumptions is strawmanni…
/r/MensRights23/12/14 06:51 AM
2

A common tactic used by the intellectually dishonest in an argument is to call an end to the argument when backed against a wall, pretending the argument is not worth it anymore/ trying to divert focus from the question they cannot answer. Your language also went ahead and devolved into tumblrina gibberish so I am assuming when you say well-educated you mean a liberal arts degree with no logic or politics classes. This is so fucking ridiculous it's not even funny, like serious, lets just stop fo…
/r/MensRights23/12/14 06:43 AM
1

I actually never said they didn't meet. You done fucked up badly with this comment. Interent tiffs 101: you say some shit like that the first thing you do is check if it ever happened A truce between the KKK and the NAACP would also be silly, though the magnitude of difference is very large the basic concept of some conflicts should not have cocktail parties is important. Literally didn't say they never met. I didn't even say the word meeting. They met. Did it fix everything? No. Was it silly? m…
/r/MensRights23/12/14 06:37 AM
1

I'm going to go ahead and not be tone policed by someone who attempted to insult me when they thought they were losing, compared my gender to dogs and continually responds to points by simply dismissing them. Many blacks have never been taught to not be criminals. In fact they are trained to NOT be innocent civilians. The black men that are criminals are so because society failed to provide other opportunities for them The first one is your initial statement I disliked, with the words subbed out…
/r/MensRights23/12/14 06:33 AM
1

"Many black men have been, are, or will be in jail, this is because the criminal justice system convicts them at much higher rates than other some other groups" Non insulting. Black men have been trained by society to be criminals. Insulting. You just used my own way to phrase things in a non insulting way when making your statement. How in the fuck do you not get that. edit: I appreciate that losing an argument on this scale might be disheartening to you but ad hominem attacks do not help your …
/r/MensRights23/12/14 05:57 AM
1

You attempted to mock me by quoting the "well-researched" part of what I said, contrasting it against the supposed ignorance of the meeting between the KKK and the NAACP. I responded by pointing out that my assertion that a meeting would be silly held up admirably (a hate group met with a group that it hates and asserted their hatred again publicly... silly or disgusting, pick your words.) I am sorry you didn't read what you linked before you linked it, but you set yourself the fuck up for a sla…
/r/MensRights23/12/14 05:48 AM
1

You should read your own article. The KKK said that they did not ask anybody in the room to join because they won't allow whites. I think telling the blacks they cannot join due to their inferior skin color in a "truce" meeting is really fucking silly. Thank you for proving my point. "Abarr told The Associated Press that he met with Simmons Saturday and ended up filling out an NAACP membership form so he can get the group's newsletters and some insight into its views. He said he paid the $30 fee…
/r/MensRights23/12/14 05:33 AM
1

I would agree with that statement, and it would be generalizing. The difference in phrasing and content is important. Many men have never been taught how to listen properly. In fact, they've been trained NOT to listen. This statement asserts men don't listen, a negative stereotype about men. Do you disagree that we live in a culture that discourages men from being emotional and vulnerable with each other? This statement focuses on the culture negatively effecting men as opposed to men having a s…
/r/MensRights23/12/14 05:27 AM
1

Many men have never been taught how to listen properly. In fact, they've been trained NOT to listen. generalizing and insulting an entire gender isn't cool I have done neither of those things. You have done both. The amount of information you would need to gather to have an informed opinion on what a society of 300 million people is trained to do would be simply staggering. Guessing at social issues based off biased experiences is generalizing.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 04:58 AM
1

Many men have never been taught how to listen properly. In fact, they've been trained NOT to listen. Generalizing and insulting an entire gender isn't cool, even if you are picking on the gender that gets no sympathy when it is shit on. As a good rule of thumb, if you want to make sweeping generalizations about a group you feel is safe to pick on replace every instance of the word men with a racial minority or the word women and if it makes you look like bigoted then just scrap the comment.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 04:42 AM
1

I play a card game as my main hobby (magic the gathering) and have, on a few occasions, had my post history in the MR subreddit be used as an argument against me. It is really weird when feminists use my social activist views against me when discussing the merits of cards in a fantasy game but it has happened about a half dozen times. My favorite was when someone directly told me my opinion on an issue in the magic community did not matter due to me "hating women like all the other Men's Rights …
/r/MensRights23/12/14 04:27 AM
1

I literally copied and pasted an entire comment, that is the fairest one can possibly be when critiquing something. Many men have never been taught how to listen properly. In fact, they've been trained NOT to listen. This is a direct quote. There is no quote more direct than a direct quote.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 04:25 AM
1

Actually going to comment again, my last one was two nice after reading one of your recent posts. After reading your comments directly comparing men to dogs, insulting men and advocating for us being trained like animals you can go ahead and fuck off and die. Discriminating based off natural characteristics like race or sex is fucking disgusting and you should be downright ashamed of yourself. Go back to your fucking hole. Comment copy and pasted below if anyone wants to read what this fuck thin…
/r/MensRights23/12/14 04:19 AM
1

This is a cute idea but very hard to organize and I would be shocked if it was even remotely effective. participants will make a good faith to effort participate in the way they are being asked; if they are asked not to use certain words - they wont, or comment only in certain ways, etc. That won't go well. In general we should try to remain polite to those who are not obviously trollish or outspoken in a violent, ignorant or cruel way. The holiday truce was between soldiers who were being force…
/r/MensRights23/12/14 04:13 AM
13

I'll be as straightforward as possible here. The section I am looking at jumped out at me because I have written a lot of erotica (I was in a long distance relationship for 2 years while my SO and I were separated due to work and I wanted her to have at least a few letters every week to cheer her up, some of which were erotica, some not) and I instantly recognized it as being a very sexual way of describing something. I would use very similar, or the same exact wording if I wanted to make the re…
/r/MensRights10/12/14 07:23 PM
8

Her sticky, muscly little body thrashed beside me She thrashed against me My hyper sister bounced around beside me My sister wriggled around beside me She wiggled around beside me There are many, many ways to phrase what she is trying to say without sexualizing her sister. Do you honestly not see the difference between what she writes and the multitude of neutral ways she could have done it?
/r/MensRights10/12/14 07:07 PM
15

Her sticky, muscly little body Read this section until you fully grasp the sexuality of it all. It reads like erotica.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 07:02 PM
13

She cuddled in bed with her sister while masturbating. Not when 7.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 05:35 PM
4

No need to be insulting like that.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 10:18 PM
3

They are being sarcastic.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 07:52 PM
3

I am quite calm, thank you. 1) "I think most of our disagreement comes from how much you care about sexual sensation and how little I actually care about that as part of the issue." I quoted you directly, you supported my opinion that it is a subjective judgment. Please respond to my argument. 2) Please respond to the argument. 3) You misread, I will respond to point 3 if you reread. I never said you made an assumption. 4) I did not say you were a proponent. Calm down and read. In points 3 and 4…
/r/MensRights04/12/14 04:50 AM
4

I think most of our disagreement comes from how much you care about sexual sensation and how little I actually care about that as part of the issue. You have reinforced my point that this is a subjective moralistic judgment that should not be decided by doctors. edit: It is important to note that if I am correct that people can argue about the subjective judgment of pleasure vs ability to have unprotected sex with infected people more and that the argument is a non trivial one then the CDC's opi…
/r/MensRights04/12/14 04:02 AM
5

I think the big issue is that the decision is not based off of scientific grounds because the "risks" of circumcision are weighed in some odd moralistic clusterfuck. If we look at circumcision as just a problem of "Is the lower risk of STDS worth it with the downside of X?" we can quickly figure out the issue. So, the downside X (from the standpoint of those pro circumcision) is that the surgery has possible complications and may reduce sensitivity. The downside X (from the standpoint of those a…
/r/MensRights04/12/14 03:11 AM
6

My goodness, what a pretentious, persecuted little edit you have there. Downright adorable little flag waving feminist.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 01:57 AM
7

Pretty sure this is a troll misrepresenting an article in an attempt to create something they can link to and go "hurrdurr look they hate womyn." This dude harassed his ex gf by disseminating nude photos of her and trying to get her fired. That sounds like pretty open and shut case of harassment. The guy sounds like a fuck, harassment is not cool and is also not legal. This is not a men's rights issue. edit: Looked through OP's post history and instead of being a troll might just be an insane mi…
/r/MensRights02/12/14 08:34 PM
6

Ah, didn't realize you were a troll until now. If you are a bit more subtle you could keep the game going for much, much longer. Delete the account and try again.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 05:24 AM
14

Rape is more than just sex, it's how you treat your partner after and the emotional bonding Holy shit that is a terrifying standard you are trying to impose. Lack of emotional bonding afterwards does not makes it rape. Rape is sex without consent (or forced/coerced consent) not consensual sex later re-imagined and distorted due to a perceived slight you delusional fuckhead. Making idiotic standards like that belittle real struggles.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 01:55 AM
-1

Did you read your own link? She blamed it on him but that didn't stop the police from charging her. This seems like a non issue for the purpose of this subreddit.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 05:57 PM
13

According to those who read it in 2x she continued to abuse her sister up until she (lena) was 17 and her sister was 10. Criminalizing a 7 year old is bad but someone who is 17 is no longer an innocent child.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 08:02 PM
1

That is actually exactly how sourcing works, it is just easier to trust it if he dressed if they dressed it up in a blogpost or published a study about it. Articles can be bullshitted easily and if you keep asking to go deeper into any source eventually you ask yourself "are the people responsible for the base data honest?"
/r/MensRights10/10/14 08:36 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter