TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Tree-Lover42 Archive

View 0 posts and 23 comments by Tree-Lover42 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
18

Total cope lmao. Facial attractiveness is 70% heritable, and most of the other 30% is measurement variability.
/r/BlackPillScience31/07/26 01:51 PM
0

g’s heritability is far too high for your proposed environmental influence to be meaningful.
/r/BlackPillScience13/07/26 11:54 PM
4

There is a weak to moderate correlation between height and general intelligence which can’t be neglected.
/r/BlackPillScience13/07/26 01:06 PM
2

You can disagree, but cross cultural surveys tend to show a consistent attractiveness advantage along lines that Nordic and Slavic women show most frequently. They’re not best at everything - Persians and Arabs tend to have better eye areas, but Nordics and Slavics tend to show up at the top of attractiveness studies for a reason (and it’s not racial related, it’s just that those groups have higher rates of attractive faces). Not sure where you get the idea they’re not dimorphic - some of the la…
/r/BlackPillScience11/03/26 04:58 PM
3

I don’t agree. The most attractive groups globally are those with significant Yamnaya ancestry, a group that evolved in the frigid Central Asian steppe. In the modern day the most attractive group is generally regarded to be Nordics who have a very cold (Finland) to somewhat cold (Denmark) background. But there are some areas which are significantly colder like Siberia and interior North America, and those groups don’t have the same strong dimorphism we observe in Europe.
/r/BlackPillScience11/03/26 02:47 PM
50

Water
/r/BlackPillScience01/03/26 11:36 PM
1

You can’t quantify face but a PSL Chad would be worshipped by women, meanwhile this woman just has to bring up height constantly. How attractive are the girls making fun of the short guy? Regarding the 20/20 segment, the dude was below 1st percentile height. You’d see the same results for face and NT.
/r/BlackPillScience26/07/25 05:09 PM
5

You’re pretty much dead on the apps if you’re sub HTN facially, regardless of height. For the 85% of men that need other avenues, height helps them disproportionately in real life.
/r/BlackPillScience26/07/25 04:07 PM
8

This is generally the wrong advice. Good looking short men can still get decent to good results on apps. In person height is more apparent and this is where tall normies can use their height to their advantage.
/r/BlackPillScience26/07/25 03:46 PM
5

I’m calling BS on this. An 8.5 is pushing 98th percentile and a 9 is over 99th percentile. There’s no way with these stats you can even get one into a LTR without huge status or money, let alone as a FWB.
/r/BlackPillScience26/07/25 03:27 PM
1

I agree with what you say about 1 and 4. I’ll respond to the others. I did make my claims from Stulp as well. While again I can’t read the study right now, I believe 5’10-5’11 showed acceptance rates around 32% while 6’2-6’3 was around 36%. That isn’t negligible, but it’s only about a 15% increase, consistent with .org experiments. Can you link the study showing this increase per inch? There was a German study done earlier this year which showed face beating everything else combined, which that …
/r/BlackPillScience26/07/25 02:12 PM
-8

… and here comes another coper. Let me set the facts straight as a 5’6” dude. Filters This is meaningless if they’re not actually used. Given that they’re hiding behind paywalls, almost no women are actually using the height filters. Why would women pay for a dating app? Of course after reading the height there’s a chance you get rejected, but that’s not a filter. What Women Say One of the fundamental rules of the black pill is to not listen to what women say. Now, in the case of height women’s …
/r/BlackPillScience26/07/25 01:48 PM
4

In the long run I think the East Asian population ends up similar to the Italian American population. Essentially mixed in to the White Population with clusters of "purer" people like we see in places like New Jersey / NYC.
/r/BlackPillScience25/07/25 03:27 PM
2

I think most of the Asian deficit is due to difference in facial features, although the other factors certainly don't help. Flatter maxillae, typically weaker brow ridge and jaw.
/r/BlackPillScience25/07/25 03:25 PM
39

Isn't increasing maternal age also associated with increased ASD among many other mental problems? Seems like a pretty bad trade off overall.
/r/BlackPillScience26/06/25 06:40 PM
17

2.09 * 1013 is a pretty high body count can't lie.
/r/BlackPillScience19/05/25 09:08 PM
0

Women’s standards are much fairer, a majority of dating app swiping variance is just between above average faces. Height, money, physique, frame, and below average faces combined have less swing,
/r/MensRights15/05/25 10:42 AM
9

I'm actually not sure if this is true. Some autistic facial features are more attractive on average (wider, flatter eyes; shorter midface). Some signs that autism may be correlated with high prenatal T which is known to be a huge positive in isolation. I do agree that for the extreme ends it tends to diverge because the traits get too extreme, which is what you see at some of the dedicated autistic events.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 08:41 PM
–

Three things: Simple variance from the mean (if most are looksmatched there are bound to be some above and below), put on weight in the relationship, or money is involved. I tend to agree I've never seen this. Height can be a somewhat mediating factor but not to this extent.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 12:50 PM
1

There’s some level of variance, but studies still show face is responsible for 70% of variance in dating app swipes, way harsher than height. No cutoff, but +1 SD is way more beneficial than any height.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 02:18 AM
1

Face is actually even harsher than height. It's just still taboo for women to actually talk about.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 09:51 PM
6

"What matters most" can be defined as the following: Given a percentile p of an attribute (face, height, personality, confidence, money, etc.), which one will have the biggest benefit / drawback compared to someone at the 50th percentile. Generally it's face, status, height which matter a lot, with other factors behind - according to studies.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 01:53 AM
–

I think it's actually worse than people let on. People tend to neglect facial attractiveness, and women tend to demand both height AND face, and a top 5% face seems to be the only true way to compensate for any physical shortcomings.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 11:11 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter