TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Treebiter Archive

View 0 posts and 13 comments by Treebiter on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I don't disagree. However, it's too easy for the cops to say "appeared nervous." There do need to be reasonable checks in place to prevent harassment. Many people just aren't mature enough to handle that kind of responsibility regardless of their training and position.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/05/15 05:23 PM
1

It might be. It might not. At this point I don't see what she did wrong. They didn't appear to have a valid reason to detain her.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/05/15 05:07 PM
1

Honestly, that is a great question. I don't know. I know the border patrol granted more leeway with 100 miles of any border.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/05/15 04:34 PM
1

They aren't allowed to hold you (detain you) while they wait for a drug dog regardless how they felt about the situation. http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/04/22/us/supreme-court-limits-drug-sniffing-dog-use-in-traffic-stops.html?referrer=&_r=0 I think it's meant to be a guard against "we had to detain them for 48 hours (or insert whatever time the cops want to hold someone) because our drug dog was indisposed."
/r/PussyPassDenied23/05/15 11:13 AM
0

A week late, but you are right.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/05/15 11:05 AM
1

I only worry about me. Saves me a lot of headaches :)
/r/MensRights08/04/15 05:13 PM
3

Yes, that is what a trial is for. To prove one side or the other as best as is possible.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 04:11 PM
2

No one said that an investigation shouldn't happen. That's what should happen. However, it is very easy to assume he is guilty or that the girls are lying. I am simply saying that at this stage he is innocent as that is the law until proven otherwise. This applies to all parties.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 04:10 PM
10

It's not really fair to "keep an open mind" when there is not evidence he did anything. That's like me saying I don't have any evidence you aren't a serial killer, therefore you very well could be. If there is no evidence that something happened, then you have to assume that it didn't.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 01:50 PM
15

It's to prevent abuse.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 11:40 AM
6

Let me ask you a question. How do I prove "yes?" Do I need a video? Written consent? We have lawyers littered across the country to write documents just because people lie, cheat, and steal. So in this case how do I prove consent given that verbal contracts, especially without witnesses, are largely ignored in the legal system?
/r/MensRights30/08/14 08:08 AM
0

People often play really stupid when caught doing something bad. It sounds like pretty common criminal behavior to me.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 08:16 PM
2

A UCMJ for police, you say? This is an interesting idea.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 07:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter