TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TrickyCounty4506 Archive

View 1 post and 146 comments by TrickyCounty4506 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
83

ProgressTrickyCounty4506/r/MensRights20/12/25 12:27 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Literally 99 percent of men have done nothing wrong. The one percent of men who do it, where feminism is getting at us. So the man is not only correct, he is correct also for 99% of all men.
/r/MensRights30/12/25 11:29 AM
2

I don't know, but I watch some many episodes on Whatever Podcast arguing about this, they would even take help from a men against the bear they would encounter, which they choose vs a men. Translation: We are screwed.
/r/MensRights27/12/25 03:47 PM
185

Because Feminism had made women following: Accountability of Child, Protected like a first class citizen.
/r/MensRights27/12/25 06:52 AM
7

Divide and conquer: It’s a strategy of separating people into groups. Once those labeled as ‘toxic men’ are dealt with, the same approach may eventually be applied to other men as well.
/r/MensRights27/12/25 06:45 AM
6

The most important law is "Innocent until proven". The most outlaws, non-law abiding persons are those who oppose this. Feminists literally have circumvented "Innocent until proven." And those will literally accuse men of witch hunting.
/r/MensRights26/12/25 12:40 PM
1

The problem is "You are never enough"! It does not matter what you do.
/r/MensRights26/12/25 10:00 AM
4

I know, but some time we should literally make a list of all the shit feminists said and have one thread to compile the list. The above quote, if right, is literally the reason, why never a men will support feminism or socialism. They want the individual men to support his own sacrifice ("cucking").
/r/MensRights26/12/25 09:59 AM
2

You do understand, that some books like the "48 Laws of Power" are banned from certain prisons: "The book has been banned by several US prisons.\20])" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\48_Laws_of_Power) Also this has nothing to do with freedom of expression, this is literally in the most most literal sense hate speech. It gives you a step by step way of literally destroying a men. Are you f. kidding me? Every time someone which comes with "Hate speech", they will do it for bogus reasons. But the…
/r/MensRights26/12/25 09:56 AM
1

If you give me the arguments against me, than do it. You cannot. AI wins.
/r/MensRights26/12/25 07:29 AM
12

The problem with "Misogyn is killing women" is that it's bullshit. Lets assume following case: A men has debt to another men and the other men kills him. Nobody would come to the idea, that "gender" or "sex" has anything to do with the murder. The same would also be true if a women killed the murder of her child or something similar. Nobody would say, it's misandry or something else. Yes, women are more likely to be killed by men, than otherwise, however: 1.) It has NOTHING to do with men being …
/r/MensRights23/12/25 04:30 PM
1

Keep in mind that they don’t officially refer to these initiatives as ‘re‑education’ programs — that’s simply how I interpret them. Still, I agree that nearly all dictators have used similar methods extensively to shape and control public opinion.
/r/MensRights23/12/25 02:41 PM
2

Don't get me wrong, I do not think Islamists are the problem, however mass immigration is always every time a problem, especially when they protected by the state. There was the case of the Ukraine Girl killed in the train I think and the murderer was literally let out of the asylum. Also, women are today much more safer than years ago and they have more shelter than ever, more institutions than ever, but they are more frightened by men? Some logic is not clicking for me. They rather meet a bear…
/r/MensRights22/12/25 04:33 PM
1

"We have to get abused?" F... this female classmate, disgusting.
/r/MensRights21/12/25 08:24 PM
1

But this is your opinion, never have I said, that something matters as water. However people being lonely are getting depression. Not everybody, not everyone. But most people are. If Incels want to have sex, they shall get it, but I am not agreeing, that we should have state sponsored wives or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 07:54 PM
1

Yes, it's actually an illusion. It's like 65% of women reporting an orgasm and a lot of men do nor report an orgasm, because they are out of the data. It's funny, how the orgasm gap is used against men. Bias affects who gets counted, the men with ED are not part of the metric and also orgasms get destroyed by male with ED and PE, so it actually matters. "women exaggerate" or "men are erased", yes this is the problem, nothing else shown here and it's quite honestly disingenuous. Men are not selfi…
/r/MensRights21/12/25 07:52 PM
1

That's the problem, no one owes you sex, however I would like a society were sex in good manner (aka marriage) is supported the same way homeless shelters exist. You self are not forced to have sex with us or any woman. And also I am 100% against rapist and cannot tell you here, what I want to happen to them. I would say the same thing about "friendships". Nobody owes you friendship, but I would like a society where this is encouraged and societally suppported. That's the problem, you think any …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 06:11 PM
1

But those men want sex, need it and they feel bad about. If you are asexual, that another question, but Incels need sex. It might not be the most basic things, but it very near to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 06:04 PM
2

Onlyfans -> Parasocial Relationships and paying for content. Smut -> Women having expectations of men with penis sizes a men cannot provide. Porn -> Men getting probably ED (PIED) and also body dysmorphia. Yeah all in, it shitty.
/r/MensRights21/12/25 05:05 PM
1

I disagree with the "heterosexual cultural script". I can't explain you without writing to you in PM about my essay.
/r/MensRights21/12/25 03:32 PM
3

And that survivorship bias you are talking about explains the "Orgasm Gap 95% men vs 65% women": Couple 1 – The Failed Night Friday evening. Mark (47) and Lisa have been married 12 years. They start fooling around, but Mark can’t get or stay hard tonight. After ten awkward minutes they give up, cuddle, and fall asleep. Saturday morning. Mark pours his coffee, scrolls through the news, sees the big headline: “National Sex Survey – Tell Us About Your Orgasms!” First screening question: “Have you h…
/r/MensRights21/12/25 03:27 PM
2

**Women leaving or divorcing partner with sexual dysfunction** It could be argued, that some studies state, that men are more sexually healthy in relationships, so they have lesser sexual dysfunctions. The argument of that is "use it or lose it", so by having more sex in a committed relationship, the sexual organs are used like a muscles you train and thus not lose functionality. However, the data is most likely not showing, that men in relationships are more healthier, rather it probably is, th…
/r/MensRights21/12/25 02:47 PM
3

I disagree, however this here is also wrong: "Women can experience pleasure without faking it, and men’s worth shouldn’t be tied to a single sexual performance." Yes, it's actually tied to it. Women blame us men, because we cannot make them wet like their precious toys.
/r/MensRights21/12/25 02:46 PM
3

I am happy to disagree: Literally all second wave feminists (Koedt herself too) believed in Lesbian Supremacy and they still do. Also concentrate on those both things: "Why Men Maintain the Myth 1. Sexual Penetration is Preferred - The best.stimulant for the penis is the. woman's vagina. It supplied the necessary friction and lubrication. From a strictly technical point of view this position offers the best physical conditions, even though the man may try other positions for variation" "4. Sexua…
/r/MensRights21/12/25 02:15 PM
2

Also I disagree, that the "Orgasm Gap is real". I wrote an essay. If you chat with me in PM, I can send you my arguments. If you like.
/r/MensRights21/12/25 02:00 PM
0

**Quote**:"Why Men Maintain the Myth 1. Sexual Penetration is Preferred - The best.stimulant for the penis is the. woman's vagina. It supplied the necessary friction and lubrication. From a strictly technical point of view this position offers the best physical conditions, even though the man may try other positions for variation, 2. The Invisible Woman - One of the elements of male chauvinism is the refusal or inability to see women as total, separate human beings. Rather, men have chosen to de…
/r/MensRights21/12/25 01:59 PM
2

Hello, me too. About Koedt: [14]The Myth of the VAGINAL ORGASM published by Anne Koedt **Quote**:"Women Who Say They Have Vaginal Orgasms Confusion - Because, of the lack of knowledge of their own anatomy, some women accept the idea that an orgasm felt during "normal" intercourse was vaginally caused. This confusion is caused by a combination of two factors. One, failing to locate the center of the orgasm, and two,. by a desire to fit her experience to the maledefined idea of sexual normalcy. Co…
/r/MensRights21/12/25 01:59 PM
4

They will say "But women need vibrators", I am saturated with the hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights21/12/25 10:31 AM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HzSrHizE3Ls Never sacrifice yourself for rich men and women partying while you are dying.
/r/MensRights21/12/25 10:29 AM
9

There already is hypocrisy related to porn use and vibrator use: Men are told to stop watching (which is totally correct), but women are not told to stop using vibrators. The smut thing is probably the cherry on top of it. Flip the situation around for a second. Imagine a woman learning that her partner keeps a hyper-realistic, always-wet, always-ready sex doll that never has headaches, never needs foreplay, and can be used whenever he feels like it. Imagine he says, smiling, “It’s just more con…
/r/MensRights21/12/25 10:25 AM
1

1.1 Italy, 1.2 Poland, 1.3 Look at: termometer_men_ o rLike_men3R for all the those: 1.1: termometer_men_ 10,10,10,10,10,10,10,10,10,10,10,10,10,10,9,9,9,9,9,9,9,9,9,9,9,9,9,9,9,9,9,9,9,9,9,9 1.2: MenThrm 10,10,10,10,10,10,10,10,10,10,10,10,10,10,10,10,10,10,10,10,9,9,9,9,9,9,9,9,9,9,9,9,9,9,9,9,9,9,9,9,9,9,9,8 1.3: Like_men3R 7,7,7,7,7,7,7,7,7,5,7,7,4,7,7,4,7,7,7,7,7,6,7,7,5,7,7,5,7,7,4,7,6,7,7 Isn't this pattern strange, the ids for Participants are all ascending order starting 0 to higher num…
/r/MensRights21/12/25 09:14 AM
2

https://osf.io/7ub2e/files/osfstorage I found it, will look at it.
/r/MensRights21/12/25 07:59 AM
2

EDIT: QUOTE From Supplementary Material:" Just look at this sentence specially: "A main effect of gender F(1, 1828) = 202.27, p < .001, η2p = .10 (i.e., female participants report greater warmth toward men than men do), and feminist identity was present, F(1, 1828) = 4.19, p = .041, η2p = .002 (i.e., feminists reported slightly warmer attitudes toward men than non-feminists)." So these people will have measured more warmth toward men than men do??? Am I reading right?
/r/MensRights21/12/25 07:34 AM
1

I just wonder, if we should actually ask about the raw data of the study?
/r/MensRights21/12/25 07:18 AM
9

I think it's like a dictator saying "We checked ourselves and we found nothing wrong with us!" As for the paper itself: "In six studies, we examined the accuracy and underpinnings of the damaging stereotype that feminists harbor negative attitudes toward men. In Study 1 (n = 1,664), feminist and nonfeminist women displayed similarly positive attitudes toward men. Study 2 (n = 3,892) replicated these results in non-WEIRD countries and among male participants. Study 3 (n = 198) extended them to im…
/r/MensRights21/12/25 07:12 AM
2

I really thought too, that it was "trolling", however I think really, that it's a real fear they experience. YouGov had survey, Whatever Podcast several episodes and also a lot of women in the YouTube comments agreeing with this, so I would say, they fear, but their fear is not justified in any means, because we are safer today than years ago.
/r/MensRights20/12/25 03:20 PM
3

This is so bad, that women actually believe, that men are more dangerous than bear. How are we ever win the argument?
/r/MensRights20/12/25 01:12 PM
1

So basically the NGO is literally saying, that they are paying women less than men in a equal position and now they had to make it up for women. Why does the NGO pay men more money to the job, could it be, that they are more ambitious or they actually getting the same money, but now pay men for the same job less than women. These NGOs are idiots.
/r/MensRights20/12/25 12:39 PM
2

Women have Institutions and media outlets only for Women's issues. What do "Incels" have? Literally a few YouTube channels or something, which are at the brink of being deleted anytime they like. I swear the the Privileg they have is making it hard for them to understand.
/r/MensRights20/12/25 12:35 PM
2

This is literally the oldest Hollywood idea, they are still pushing. Men are idiots without their wives. But as you all know : "Misandry does not exist!!!"
/r/MensRights20/12/25 12:30 PM
-2

I am sorry, but religion and feminism are opposite. She is covert feminist, which uses feminism and religion to push her agenda. That's why young guys go to orthodox churches, because they know, they have a corrupted religion, that has nothing to do with the religion just 50 years ago. Todays protestants or Catholics have nothing to do with their teaching like 50 years ago.
/r/MensRights20/12/25 07:41 AM
2

"Attractive" the keyword.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 04:55 PM
1

[160]https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0192513X03254507 **Quote**:"We used national panel data collected between 1980 and 1997 to classify 208 people's open-ended responses to a question on why their marriages ended in divorce. Infidelity was the most commonly reported cause, followed by incompatibility, drinking or drug use, and growing apart. People's specific reasons for divorcing varied with gender, social class, and life course variables. Former husbands and wives were more likely to…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 04:41 PM
1

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fare.13039 Quote:"Odds of union dissolution are not associated with men's absolute level of egalitarian attitudes, but they are higher when men's attitudes are less egalitarian than their partner's. Neither the absolute number of men's housework hours, nor their share of total housework, is associated with the odds of dissolution." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divorce_of_same-sex_couples Sometimes lesbians divorce more than hetero couples, sometimes l…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 04:38 PM
1

I think he means, that they are more homogeneous (less people from outside). Otherwise, they IPV is higher there.
/r/BlackPillScience17/12/25 09:59 PM
1

I think women are generally better single, than couples with anybody, since even in same sex relationships they suck. Also we do not know, if they are really that happy. These metrics that capture happiness could be corrupted by the line of questioning.
/r/BlackPillScience17/12/25 09:53 PM
1

If you are lower than 5, then you are literally invisible.
/r/BlackPillScience17/12/25 09:50 PM
1

Don't get wrong guys, but this bogus thing could not accurate, because we have not significant data on this: https://datepsychology.com/did-a-fake-polygraph-catch-women-lying-about-their-sexual-partner-count/
/r/BlackPillScience17/12/25 09:40 PM
5

Of course Men we must blame /s
/r/BlackPillScience17/12/25 09:16 PM
1

Also could be reverse causality. Women who use tinder are probably do not see them as mentally ill. Because all we know, that hookups are worse for women from a psychological point of view.
/r/BlackPillScience17/12/25 09:14 PM
2

No, I was right. Bingo card worked. You tried to gotcha me with that. Yes, it seems to be that women product. Show me one solution: Stop killing people. 99 men know, 1 does not know. What about that one guy, what's your plan with him, that's what I am asking. You cannot come up with one solution. "The solution to theft is not stealing guy, do not steal."
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 08:47 PM
2

Again: 99 do not commit, one does.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 08:47 PM
0

You are literally implying, that women are superior than men. By the way, women can use weapons, but they do not. Weapons are equalizer, but women are the first one against the second Amendment. Not man's fault. But they would not be deadly as men, you gotta have this out of your system. "Most men are also using weapons and not murdering with their bare hands." could be, don't know. JUST SAY IT: "Women are superior than men."
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 08:15 PM
2

I literally knew it, you would try to Gotcha me with that. "Really digging the way you made men’s violence the fault of women somehow because men lack agency of their own, I suppose. Few people seem to hate men as much as you folks do." Yes, men have been made this way by single mothers. Or if you would explain to me: What are men supposed to do? Can you explain: 1.) If it's biology, then nothing can be done. 2.) If it's single mother, nothing can be done. 3.) (your position I guess): If it's pa…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 08:11 PM
1

I agree, I will not provide protection to anyone, especially not someone who puts his life in danger. Everybody, men, women, whatever, is not obliged to help and I will not do it. Let people have their hell and if something happens, men can just give f about it. I think the difference in Blue, Red, Black pill is following: Seeing a house burning: Blue Pill helps, Red Pill let's it burn, Black Pill will additional oil to burn. The red pill concept is, just let the house burn and they can then dec…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 08:08 PM
1

Agreed.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 08:00 PM
1

Could it be, that men are more powerful and thus the can harm more weaker people, could that be the reason? If one gender is generally stronger, than the other one, this leads to more violence. However, 99.00% of men have not killed a women, from those 1%, yes 97% or more have killed a partners, rather the women killing the partner. Why? Because they are stronger. You are literally arguing about a strawmen. 99 men are not dangerous, 1 is and men generally (being more conservative or traditional)…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 07:59 PM
1

"Yes, that's because men typically aren't in close proximity to their very small children. When it comes to murdering children, men are always #1." https://theconversation.com/men-and-women-kill-their-children-in-roughly-equal-numbers-and-we-need-to-understand-why-153527 Quote:"Research indicates that gender does, in fact, play a role in the type of crime committed and the motivations behind it. Accidental killings of children, for instance, are more likely to be the result of neglect among moth…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 07:59 PM
1

From other men, that are dangerous? And probably this will be your "Gotcha" Moment, which is not, since those men are raised by singles mothers.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 07:47 PM
1

"Men are the biggest threat to other men, women, and children on the planet." Most child abuse comes from mothers. Most lesbians have DV and are divorcing at higher rates. I wish you would inject Testosterone into your body to know, what it feels like to be a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 04:58 PM
1

I am not sure, if this applies to general online surveys or sexual surveys, but make out of it what you will: **Self-Selection of people with sexual abuse history** Research shows that in online sex surveys, participation is more likely among women and individuals with a history of sexual abuse or assault.[171] While the study did not examine sexual functioning directly, one possible explanation is that women with abuse histories may face challenges with sexual satisfaction or orgasm, motivating…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 04:42 PM
0

They just hate men, they know very well, that males are the protectors, but they deny that. Of course: Some women and especially mothers are protectors too. I wish women would go all to Scandinavian Countries, because they believe them to be good. Let them all go there and the rest we can enjoy us.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 04:39 PM
5

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/poll-gen-zs-gender-divide-reaches-politics-views-marriage-children-suc-rcna229255 "Which of the following is important to your personal definition of success? Results among respondents ages 18-29. Each respondent was able to pick three choices out of 13 options." Rank 1: Trump voting men: Having Children and Rank 4 for marriage. All others did not want it as a priority.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 04:35 PM
1

Yes, however what women want is not more children, while men want a family. Her body her choice, my wallet my choice. Sure, I would say, that people should find people with the same values and then procreate, however they are lesser in the west, to they will go extinct in few years probably.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 04:28 PM
1

Never said anything else. But you treat it as a pathology. I will treat promiscuity it as well as pathology. Look for people with the same values, go for you too.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 04:17 PM
1

Either you can shut them down or teach men, that they are not working, because they are not. Most redpill men know this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QR6pBY1_MHY
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 01:56 PM
1

How do democrats help with that? Telling them that they are toxic masculine and they need to change, even though, they have never touched a woman. You gotta be kidding me. There is a reason, that Scott Galloway is now trying to help young men. Again, I am asking a general question: WHY WOULD I SUPPORT A SYSTEM, THAT HATES ME? You do not give me answers, you literally weasel out of answering the only question. But sure Incels are the danger to society and not feminist.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 01:54 PM
1

No, I mean, that dating apps are not working for men. Even Grannies have better chances than the average men. You want to understand me horribly wrong, aint you?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 01:38 PM
11

You have no Idea what you are talking about. The system, which doesn't work for incels, incels have to pay taxes. Why would they do it. Of course women have to pay taxes, but the system works in their favor you BRAINDEAD.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 01:36 PM
2

I am not trolling. EVEN: If that would be true, why would any men today, especially "incels" would support that. Just imagine, you are working, paying taxes and the system gives a f about you. Just give me one reason for that. Why would they? Why would anybody support a system, which does not care about him? Tell me that.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 12:06 AM
1

You do not want to understand my argument, but last question: EVEN: If that would be true, why would any men today, especially "incels" would support that. Just imagine, you are working, paying taxes and the system gives a f about you. Just give me one reason for that. Why would they?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 12:01 AM
2

So called "culture" is made from biology. You literally argue against nature. "They both made some pressure, but only society made laws that made it so that if a woman walks away from a mate she doesn't like, then a bunch of other unrelated males who don't personally know her or her mate will gang up on her and drag her back to the male against her will. (which was the case back in the early days of women's domestic abuse shelters in the mid 1900s. It was literally illegal to house a runaway wif…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 11:49 PM
1

You understand, that I mean, it's easy for random people to say, that they will not procreate. It's not the patriarchy that told men that they need to procreate, it's their biology. That's why humans like sex. If men would not care about procreating, than "incels" would not exist. I say, it's biological need to procreate. If you have another opinion about this, sure, you are free to have it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 11:40 PM
2

Appeal to Nature Fallacy is the worst misused fallacy. If we have a certain hardware, we have to accommodate to this hardware, otherwise people feel bad. It would only be true, if men and women were the same, but they are not.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 11:35 PM
2

You are saying, that society has made the pressure. I am saying, nature made the pressure. Also I do not think, that Definition of rape to be true at all, it's not me saying that. Basically, no one had easy. But you saying, we should say, that men will have to face reality of not procreating, it's biology, they should accept it, but for women rights, we should abandon the same the biology. Also your mother not having a bank account or a house is bad, but it's not like, that men were living good …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 11:31 PM
1

Okay, then you are at least not a hypocrite.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 11:24 PM
0

Yeah same for me, but you generally people will treat that as toxic behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 11:23 PM
2

I think its easy to say "You will die", but for the receiving guy, it's hard. I am not careless with the application. Most women have procreated.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 11:22 PM
3

I think its easy to say "You will die", but for the receiving guy, it's hard. I am not careless with the application. Most women have procreated.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 11:22 PM
-4

Also we can slut shame all women, it should not be problem at all?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 10:36 PM
-3

Okay, then filtering out all people and checking their smartphones and so. However, you would regard that as toxic, am I right? No wanting to be cheated on, is controlling, yes?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 10:35 PM
3

hes lucky.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 10:33 PM
1

I think you are arguing is off. First you say, that men want to procreate, it's biology. The you say, that it is cultural condition. You have to choose one. If you talk about this BS about "Sex at dawn", then men and women were having prehistoric sexual orgies and they did not care at all, this is wrong. This book took cherry picked evidence. Second of all the sexual revolution did not benefit men or women at all. And it's crazy, how we take only parts of Evolution, that benefit certain agendas,…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 10:32 PM
4

Do you find women sexually attractive. Yes or no? If yes, you are not straight. Men certainly do find men "sexually" attractive. Finding a man attractive in general is normal. My thing is, you do not find him attractive, only what he can do for you. If you however love your husband for what he is, then he is lucky.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 10:19 PM
1

Yeah could be, but even Grannies have better chance on those apps. So they are therefore problematic. Perhaps most women do not use these apps at all too. I dont know.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 10:16 PM
4

I think you do not understand how easy the words are for you when you are on the other side: "You will not procreate" are the hardest words you can say. For women this reality has not been, since they procreated every time. There is not society that tells men, what they want, they want due to their biology, the same goes for women too.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 10:15 PM
2

Yeah, hypocrisy. That's the problem. Hater gonna hate.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 10:13 PM
-1

You gotta be kidding me: You literally are saying, that "society" has made the Illusion, that they will find a family. This has nothing to do Patriarchy or society or any elites. All men and women want to procreate. The reason, you cannot prepare them is, because it's inherently biological to procreate. The comparison is actually valid too: Most women under the term of feminism for "rape" have been "raped". Basically enforcing monogamy is "rape". You literally are trying to argue something like …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 08:40 PM
1

Actually not. There is disgust in some men. But as I said, the so called "straight women" do not exist. This is the real unicorn.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 08:32 PM
8

That's easy for you to say. Just imagine telling a man to be okay with "You will not procreate. Nature has decided, that you are not worth". Don't get me wrong, it might be true, however, you are trying to prepare men for something, you cannot prepare them. No men will accept that, the same as no women would accept, that she will be raped.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 08:28 PM
4

That's why you should treat all women the same. That's the consequence.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 08:24 PM
6

Who cares, if women love men anyway. They never have, they never will. Accepting this, is the real red pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 08:21 PM
–

First of all this is wrong: There are men prioritizing family and they want not sex to be handed out like candy. Those men do not want to marry an adult actress. But here comes the problem: "The truth is that "straight" women don't really experience attraction to men the same way men experience attraction to women." Which "straight women"? I give you an example. Name me one adult film star actress, that is purely straight. You cannot. Women are not straight and they like women more than they do …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 08:20 PM
1

Yeah, but who are those friends. Are they really helpful or really attacking a Character based on their own faulty experience. I think dating on tinder or something is inherently is wrong and leads to disaster we have actually have.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 08:13 PM
22

You know what, that the problem with feminist, they will have sex with abuser and narcissists and blame "incels". It's even "controlling" to want virgin women, even though data is clear and they have their preferences. But a "incels" preferences are inherently invalid. I will not be Mr. Save A Hoe. People like you disgust me.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 08:06 PM
18

There are no incel women. Even Grannies gets Tinder Matches more than the average men. Yes the REAL WORLD WHERE RENTS NEED TO BE PAID men live as well and they have to pay. Women are not in survival mode! They play in "easy mode". And you are right: Women either do not understand men or they understand men perfectly yet they live in denial. Literally I will laugh at feminist, that day, where most "Incels" are getting the state benefits and they will be against state benefits, since it's benefits…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 08:01 PM
4

Don't you know the first rule: When women want something, they need it, it's a basic need. But when do, it's entitlement.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 11:24 AM
61

That's the point. We live in two different worlds. The two genders are not the same and therefore their needs and wants are different. Women will never understand men. They always ignore that men are in the shit. Even in the "Purpil Pill" scene, women actively deny, that men have problems and because gigachad has alphawidowed her, all the incels are at fault for it. F that.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 11:21 AM
2

Confidence =/= bragging and shoving your ego in their face Show me how a ugyl guy shows confidence? It is not possible. It's always gigachads and women who will say, they like confidence, but ugly guys will never have confidence. It's a lie we tell to people.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 11:18 AM
1

I agree with all the posts here, all kind of feminists are misandrist. For example 3rd Wave Feminism was at least much more less dangerous perceived as for example 2dn Wave Feminism, which literally wanted all Feminist to be lesbians, so they would be free of their oppressors. I think it's always, that one way of feminist wave will go as much as they can, before they are perceived as a danger by most "normies". For example, I would say, that at least as a normie, feminism has not been a problem …
/r/MensRights16/12/25 10:00 AM
1

"In the first part of our report, we consider restrictions on certain types of evidence that carry the most risk of either introducing rape myths or infringing complainants’ rights to privacy and dignity. We recommend enhanced protection and scrutiny of requests to access complainants’ personal records including their therapy records; and new rules governing the admissibility of evidence of their sexual behaviour and of them having made a claim for criminal injuries compensation. For evidence th…
/r/MensRights15/12/25 08:54 PM
4

Yeah such stories are plenty. The reason, this does not get reported, because Men do not have such reporting places. If we had such places to report misandry and have some kind of misandry report like feminist have, feminist would stop advocating for this shit.
/r/MensRights15/12/25 08:43 PM
13

Yeah, they want the "Incel" to sacrifice himself for the narcissist they hates them. I will not sacrifice my life for some unhinged men or women who get out the street at night at dangerous places.
/r/MensRights15/12/25 06:15 PM
2

I will confront both disrespects, but I am honest, I will not sacrifice my life for some unhinged men or women who get out the street at night at dangerous places.
/r/MensRights15/12/25 06:14 PM
11

They hate men. Plain and Simple. They tolerate only men.
/r/MensRights15/12/25 06:13 PM
1

It's even worse than that. It actually means, if you read behind the sheets: "You actively need to hate men and tolerate jokes, that are made about men. Treat them like subhuman beings like women do." Of course they do not actively say that, but go on any reddit thread for lesbians, antiracist and so on. The culprit is always "MEN". They complain, that Andrew Tate is spewing hate about women, but those groups do the opposite for more years, than Andrew Tate and still they are the "good" ones. Th…
/r/MensRights15/12/25 06:12 PM
8

I'm sorry for what happened to you, this is terrible. For me, I can say, I will not help anyone, be it man or woman. I have only 1 life and this is only for me. I will not play Mr. SaveaWomen for women who get out at night to dangerous disco places of places, which are known to be dangerous and where the police is not even going in. Sorry, but my life is more worth, than people who put my life at risk, for their dangerous behavior.
/r/MensRights15/12/25 06:06 PM
1

At that time, people could still make weapons. Elites should not have those weapons at all. I do not want a cyberpunk technocracy.
/r/MensRights14/12/25 11:10 PM
6

"Patriarchy" literally mean for feminist, what benefits them most. Just imagine men would do the same to women, because of Cleopatra did something bad to a man. Also, they blame "men" instead of blaming the elites. We shall suffer for the sins, we did not commit. How about blaming the elites, instead of men. Men had to die in wars and did work 16 hours a day. How oppressing of men!!!
/r/MensRights14/12/25 11:05 PM
0

The rich still need their slaves and 1000 drones won't stop us. Let them do it, we know how to protect us.
/r/MensRights14/12/25 11:01 PM
71

Destroyed a man life, free to go. Oh man, this makes someone sick.
/r/MensRights14/12/25 10:17 PM
4

By the way; I did a research regarding correlation of scandinavian countries committing suicided, I found a correlation of 0.37 for average temp and average daylight. So it's a miniscule reason for them committing suicide. Finland Study regarding Suicide showed, that most men committed suicide in April-May and least in December and January. So those countries people even they are equal, they are killing themselves. It's not the snow, that kills them, it's the system.
/r/MensRights14/12/25 10:09 PM
2

Sure, those could be the case, that those countries report more, but why in the world I would assume this. Give me one reason, why I would assume, that people in gender equal countries report more than they experience than for example the U.S.? It's always, when metrics do not work in feminists way, they will explain it away. I could literally just assume, that 200% of men never report getting Domestic Abuse by women. However these people would not believe me. As for those countries, they will n…
/r/MensRights14/12/25 09:56 PM
9

These people do not realize, how much safer the world has become. If you were to get from Town A to Town B 200 years before, you literally had chance to die, even as a men, because some kind of animal would eat you alive. In El Salvadore, literally all people before 2022 had a chance of being killed by gang members, now they put all those people into jail, now its a peaceful area. So feminists complaining about male supremacy should look into those countries, before complaining about modern west…
/r/MensRights14/12/25 09:24 PM
1

Misandry: Women open admitting to hate men. Misogyn: Any crime against a women (like theft) or something similar, it's automatically female hatred. As some people already said, I never heard, that men were saying "I hate women", but the literal inverse, real sexism I have heart dozens of time. They are hypocrites.
/r/MensRights14/12/25 09:15 PM
12

The so called Equal countries have more reported DV instances.
/r/MensRights14/12/25 09:08 PM
2

Men are dying because of war lords aka our politicians. All countries who are at war, they force young men to die for their home country. Look Ukraine or russia. "There hasn’t been a draft in a significant period of time in most countries." You cannot vote, if you are not drafted in the US? Basically 99,99% of men do not harm women, but for those miniscule 0,01% of men, who harm women. The so called "Patriarchy" is at fault for those 0.01%. How effective of the patriarchy? I can also give you a …
/r/MensRights14/12/25 09:06 PM
27

I am being honest, most people don't care. They are literally forced for a war to die for their country, while the women and rich boys are having a good time in the clubs. Don't believe? Look: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HzSrHizE3Ls
/r/MensRights14/12/25 08:54 PM
7

It's like saying, human are anti human, because most human get killed by humans. This is literally your logic. Men are sent to wars for our war lords, women are not. So then it's "Men kill each other". No we don't, we are forced to kill each other.
/r/MensRights14/12/25 08:52 PM
8

The same what they they want to teach about men about women could be taught taught but in reverse. Would you support that?
/r/MensRights14/12/25 08:46 PM
11

But why is, that there exists not one program for "Respect Boys"? That's what feminists do not get. Men are victims of disrespect too, but this priority is only one sided. You literally are raising the next generation of narcissistic women, but you don't know. How about everybody respects everybody and disrespect is not allowed at all?
/r/MensRights14/12/25 08:43 PM
4

I wish you would lying, but unfortunately you are not.
/r/MensRights07/12/25 10:52 AM
6

Feminism and Misandry is the air we breath unfortunately. They cannot see it.
/r/MensRights07/12/25 10:49 AM
4

This is literally the story they tell you every time when they talk about feminism. It's only man hating, nothing more. Bailey vs. Motte: | **Slogan / Claim** | **Bailey (Provocative Claim)** | **Motte (Defensible Claim)** | | -------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | | _The future is female._ | Men are being replaced; the f…
/r/MensRights07/12/25 10:47 AM
1

No, times have not changed. You assume, that everything is cultural, but it's not, some of it is hardware, that you cannot change. Sure some women would do that, the majority would not.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 09:44 AM
0

Yeah sure, then I misunderstood, but I do not think, that any matured women would watch after a man, where as men would still do that. It's as I said, most women cannot tolerate a husband being a houseman, while they inverse is pretty normal and accepted and was the status quo in 75 years before.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 08:29 AM
1

But then they cannot find any men they are attracted to and you know what follows:"Women most affected!" You created the men that you would not touch. Sometimes I am sorry for "feminist men", because they are so hard in the matrix, they cannot escape it. Their world shatters.
/r/MensRights05/12/25 04:27 PM
1

"OP just wants a mommy" has been understood by me as he is a man child and needs someone to pay for his expenses. But you mean actually, he wants a "mommy" in as sexually matured women in kinky sense???? I do not understand what you actually mean. Describe in a block of text.
/r/MensRights05/12/25 04:25 PM
2

I am sorry to tell you, but literally this wrong. You are telling OP is baby, that wants a mommy, because he wants to be houseman. Most men have not called their housewives, which was very very prevalent, a baby, that wants a Daddy. If that is so obvious, give me one source, where most men called women wanting to be housewives, she wants a daddy. One source. Also just saying, but it looks childish, if someone is using "LMAO" in literally every sentence.
/r/MensRights04/12/25 04:47 PM
2

But when men do this for years on end, do we accuse women of wanting a daddy?
/r/MensRights04/12/25 10:00 AM
2

"Lets close the gender pay gap" and "I need man earning more than me". How could that even work out in real life???
/r/MensRights04/12/25 09:58 AM
2

You are the exception to the rule. Most women would never allow that to happen. Men have allowed this behavior for years.
/r/MensRights04/12/25 09:57 AM
3

Yeah, but they will say "MISANDRY DOESNT EXIST". Therefore for us to change this all is, have people in academia and dismantle toxic femininity. They have all institutional power in their hands. They project that into men. The average Joe has absolutely no power and gets torn apart in 1000 pieces for a sin he never comitted.
/r/MensRights04/12/25 09:56 AM
2

Just look at lesbians divorcing, women are not able to have those high standards themself.
/r/MensRights04/12/25 09:53 AM
2

Even, if we assume this would not be the case, women are literally never allow a man to just be houseman, never have, never will. They will even start calling someone attempting that lazy or something. Again, everybody can do anything, but practically speaking, there are less women leaving the husband to be a houseman, so the odds are against men.
/r/MensRights04/12/25 06:57 AM
17

And that's what the REDPILL is trying to tell men. Yes, if women were to be providers, sure, why not be a houseman like women are housewives. However, women never allow men to be just houseman, they would not have that deal, where as a lot of men have that deal. So the Redpill is actually warning for men against this, since most men are not informed about this. TLDR: Most women (99,99% do not want a houseman).
/r/MensRights03/12/25 03:06 PM
1

I respect your opinion too.
/r/MensRights30/11/25 07:03 PM
2

That's the problem. Literally being Pro Life is hate crime. I never said, that a man is supposed to pay or something, but men and women have to take responsibility for a child that is life and that comes to the world. Also they should not murder it, the state still can watch after it.
/r/MensRights30/11/25 05:47 AM
31

https://www.upworthy.com/study-debunked-claiming-men-leave-their-sick-wives Oh man you are so right and this has been debunked as well. Research is so f up essentially.
/r/MensRights30/11/25 01:23 AM
4

I personally am pro life, because I think its a child, so he has the right to life. For those who are pro choice: You still have to pay for the child, if the woman wants to have the child. The stance of pro choice MRAs is generally financial abortion should be an option, where a women can still have the child, but does not get anything from the biological father, since he cut his ties with the child.
/r/MensRights30/11/25 01:06 AM
1

As you said, vaginal orgasm are more common than those 18% that are claimed in the media, however as you said, we have to option to get women that are essentially vaginally orgasmic.
/r/MensRights29/11/25 08:38 PM
1

They are making this propaganda, because they want to be independet of men. If a women can only have clitoral orgasms, she can be free of men.
/r/MensRights29/11/25 08:28 PM
1

Believe me, female orgasms are harder to achieve, please lets not pretend masturbation and clitoral stimulation of the partner is the same. It's not. Also it seems you somehow even need a vibe to get to an orgasm.
/r/MensRights29/11/25 08:26 PM
1

Yes, the clito-centricc thinking of feminist really made them to have only clitoral orgasms, rather than vaginal. Doesn't anybody wonder, why did the orgasm gap despite all these years not close?
/r/MensRights29/11/25 08:21 PM
1

Vibrators can make a women orgasm to much, which is literally making those wanting more orgasms.
/r/MensRights29/11/25 08:18 PM
1

https://www.theseedsofscience.pub/p/134-orgasms-in-an-hour-questioning This is wrong. Women never orgasm so much.
/r/MensRights29/11/25 08:17 PM
1

Both are true, women have low sexual desire and men have ED or PE, so both face challagnes.
/r/MensRights29/11/25 08:09 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter