TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TriflingHotDogVendor Archive

View 1 post and 66 comments by TriflingHotDogVendor on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

TriflingHotDogVendor/r/MensRights18/02/14 04:40 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

So are things that are pink or "girly" and marketed to a certain subset of women a sign of "fragile femininity?"
/r/MensRights16/12/15 11:20 PM
24

Men already have to go through a bunch of hoops to get ED meds. First off, they are usually not covered by insurance. For the majority of men suffering from ED, it's $30 per tablet each time they want a day in which they will be able to achieve an erection. And if the insurance does pay for it, there is usually a prior authorization process where paperwork, paperwork, and waiting are always part of the equation. All those people at Medco, Aetna, or whatever get to see your name and that you need…
/r/MensRights16/12/15 06:55 PM
2

Lmfao. This goes against the "libruls are destroying America" circlejerk. Expect downvotes. I want women to earn as much as men, too. That means that we have to work less. That means that men will get equal time off for family things, not just an automatic "mom gets to take the kid to the doctor." The hours worked gap is what we should focus on. People died to strengthen the unions in the early 20th century and introduce a forty hour workweek. And like a bunch of dumb worker ants, we've let it s…
/r/MensRights29/08/15 09:32 AM
1

Yeah,I get that, but this doesn't change the fact that the population in the city is half of what it used to be. Lots of inventory, low demand. It makes for cheap rents. That's why it's so cheap to live in Yinzerville.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 07:00 PM
1

Pittsburgh is a rust belt town that has shrunken over the last half century with more available housing than demand. It's not rocket science as to why it's so cheap.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 10:46 PM
1

...touche.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 11:26 AM
20

If you watch his actual speeches, he follows this up by noting that the 40 hour workweek had disappeared. And that x percentage of women and y percentage of men (men being higher, as we all know) work over 40 hours a week. Watch the Wisconsin speech from a few weeks ago, it was definitely in that one. That's the key that many aren't seeing on this sub in relation to Sanders. He hits it from both angles. Because in the end, the feminists are partially right. There is a wage gap. And it exists bec…
/r/MensRights28/07/15 11:09 AM
6

I listened to his speech in Wisconsin. He mentioned the typical wage gap thing, sure, but he also actually mentioned the percentage of men and women that work over 40 hours per week. Noting that men work more. Then he said that we should demand a 40 hour max work week. I was amazed. If you fix the fact that men are overworked, the wage gap will fix itself. Sanders seems to actually realize this.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 03:08 PM
2

Feminism does't mean anything anymore. Especially after the second wave. Its a nebulous term that describes everything from an extremist that thinks all men should be chemically castrated to a fairly rational person that thinks that we should strive towards egalitarianism. The obsession with labels and ideology-based politics is part of the problem. Just don't label yourself.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 06:09 AM
1

This may interest you, vis-a-vis proving ghb intoxication. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12570228
/r/MensRights18/12/14 07:44 AM
12

I'm a mostly leftist advocate as well. I hate ideologies in general, but know that there are many, many, many people on the left concerning social issues that read this subreddit. I've always said that the reason I can't support the feminist ideology is that, frankly, I find it to be too conservative and old fashioned. Most people who identify as feminists have INCREDIBLY regressive views of what gender roles men should express. (Of course, feminism is a nebulous term that doesn't even mean anyt…
/r/MensRights15/12/14 08:02 PM
2

As a married person without children, I find it incredibly unfair that I have to do more work so others can pursue their elective reproductive tasks. But the solution is simple. If you never use the family medical leave allowance, you should be allowed to retire and draw 401k without penalty 3 months early. Access to social security early, too. Then it all evens out. Hook that up and I'll support this.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 04:54 AM
1

We are entering into a post scarcity, post labor world. The value of a human will be very low in 25 years. We won't need her child as much as needed before the coming automation and AI revolution.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 04:45 AM
2

It's sort of amazing how homosexuality went from overwhelmingly taboo as late as the late 90s to "I wish I was gay. It seems...easier."
/r/MensRights05/12/14 04:23 AM
5

Nurses have an extremely stressful job. And being an elementary school teacher sounds like hell on Earth. Other than that, you might have a point.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 05:17 PM
0

Until found guilty in a court of law... yes. I believe strongly in the whole innocent until proven guilty thing.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 05:59 AM
2

I'd argue that Appalachian whites certainly face several issues. They don't call it The Big White Ghetto for nothing. Otherwise...yeah, in general the typical white has it pretty easy. Though there are atypical whites. And their issues shouldn't be ignored just because Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, and the previous 40-some-odd presidents were white. Honestly, I'm tired of race as a concept in general. I wish it could just go away. We should just start humping each other until we are the same color…
/r/MensRights11/11/14 10:57 PM
23

Because we don't live in a fantasy world where our civilization can never be in peril. I get it. It would be nice if people couldn't be drafted, but if a threat to the Western world arose like it did in the 1940s, I'm sorry, but its all hands on deck. You have to be prepared for the absolute worse case scenario. That includes women defending the country right next to men in the case of such a horrible scenario. Its irresponsible to not have such a mechanism in your back pocket.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 10:54 PM
10

Because it's a politicized issue. And those that are ideologues see everything in us-them sort of way. Being in America is worse because of the false left-right dichotomy that forces everyone to see everything as liberal vs conservative. This "movement" operates outside of that dichotomy and people can't grasp this. So a challenge to the complete hegemony that the nebulous "feminism" establishment has on the discussion automatically triggers a response that goes something like "because we disagr…
/r/MensRights08/11/14 04:15 PM
4

Oddly, I oppose feminism because I feel it is too conservative and old fashioned. The gender role of men has barely changed since Victorian times. I think we need to evolve and feminism as it is today is prohibiting this.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 09:58 AM
5

As long as you get out of my way, let me do my job, and don't bug me unless necessary, I don't care if you are an alien from Pluto.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 10:14 PM
-1

We don't need a better mens' rights movement. We need an all-inclusive egalitarian movement. The mens' rights community is simply trying to show how a push towards absolute gender equality can't be accomplished by the old-fashioned, classic feminist ideology. We hope to evolve past feminism. And the feminists are holding us back from discovering ourselves outside of traditionalist gender roles by perpetuating the "male as perpetual actor" that is the backbone of academic feminism (i.e. the conce…
/r/MensRights15/10/14 05:29 PM
3

No, no it isn't. Even for those with a limited physical capacity, there are support roles. Cooks, journalists, administration, medical, etc. And in several instances, they have been incredibly effective in direct combat roles, too. The Israelis, Kurds, and several others have had women serve with gallantry.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 07:58 AM
8

No, they can't. However, the medical community is working on an artificial womb as I type. There will be a man that gives birth with an artificial incubation device some day. But you are either missing the point or being obtuse for no constructive reason. OBVIOUSLY discounting that which is impossible, the genders should enjoy absolute equality as much as is possible. And dual gender conscription is pretty straight forward and easily accomplished. You just tell everyone to show up at boot camp.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 09:49 PM
2

Feminism doesn't really mean anything anymore. Its a nebulous term that all sorts of people from rational to wacko claim as their ideology. But either way their reaction will be one of two things. They will be true egalitarians and agree that it is fair or they will do the mental gymnastics thing. Most likely, they will say that the draft shouldn't exist and pretend that we live in a world with no war. A deflectionary tactic rather than admitting that female privilege exists in many forms.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 09:41 PM
7

To hell with that. I believe in absolute equality. They do belong in the military and should be subject to selective service or, if required by that country, mandatory service. They will find them something to do. If they aren't strong enough for combat or to be a sailor, fine, there are several intellectual roles or support roles women could undertake. Women have made fantastic fighter pilots and drone pilots as well.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 09:30 PM
1

I also want women to earn as much as men. It would mean that men no longer would work 5 more hours a week on average . It would mean that men get as much time off work for family issues. It would mean that men would get to enjoy "work-life balance" as much as women. Nobody ever talks about the hours worked gap, though, do they? I'd love to only work 36 hours rather than my current 42. But my contact says 42...not negotiable. The reality is that men are treated like workhorses. And that's why the…
/r/MensRights13/10/14 02:27 AM
2

I'll sum this up. "They" are fine with allowing men to decrease the burdens thrust upon them due to Western Traditionalist mores (or, to use the ridiculous feminist term, "patriarchy" ) just as long as it doesn't affect various female privlidges. Like forcing child support upon men. Or not having to fight wars. And "they" will be glad to perform mental gymnastics to get around such inconvenient inequalities. A magical world where wars could never happen. It's not like "they" are actually seeking…
/r/MensRights12/10/14 04:20 AM
1

I've always just told people that feminism is too conservative for me. It just doesn't do enough to ensure total gender equality. We are entering into a crises of male antiintellectualism that the traditional institutions that came out of the 20th century feminist movement are ill-equipped to take head on. Feminism is just too old fashioned to meet the emerging challenges of the future. Not only is this 100% true, but it makes their heads explode because they can't rationalize it from their prec…
/r/MensRights09/10/14 10:23 AM
1

I just say "I believe in absolute gender equality." Because I do...and I've now proven that they don't.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 03:58 AM
1

I consider Marcus Aurelius' Meditations one of the most influential books of my life and not only an I not going around trying to kill myself, if anything, I think it greatly reduced the stress in my life. I think the universe has no purpose and, thus, is nothing to really get worked up over when shit doesn't go your way. It's quite relieving to just let go of the weight of the expectations that come from having implied meaning... and stoicism really helps this existentialist sort of view, IMO.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 03:31 AM
17

Its one thing to defend yourself, its another to use self defense as an excuse to be over-the-top violent. Its pretty clear to me that his intent was to harm, not to defend his person. I think that this is something that is lost a lot in these types of situations. Like the situation in Missouri where the officer has several witnesses, white and black, man and women, that are now saying that the kid had his hands up and was still killed. I have a suspicion that the officer was in the mindset that…
/r/MensRights08/09/14 08:19 PM
45

Good that they got this evidence. Prosecute him to the fullest extent of the law for inexcusably violent behavior. Of course, it makes me wonder where the outrage is when a star does something like this to a man. Pacman Jones had a thug in his entourage literally cripple a human being that happened to have a penis and nobody seemed to care. Hope Solo beat up her underage nephew, yet she's already playing again. As usual, society shrugs at violence towards men.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 01:16 PM
3

Interestingly, I got a 32 on that ACT exam. That earned me a scholarship to the local community college and I parlayed that to acceptance into pharmacy school. I count pills for a living. Nobody tells me to check my privilege, though. I don't think I expose myself to those types of people or something. Except online. The thoughts of the crazies all come out online. In reality, I actually became quite privileged. I actually don't mind that people assume I grew up in a nice tree lined street in a …
/r/MensRights01/09/14 03:44 PM
3

We should come up with a privlidge scale. You start at 0 and add or subtract based upon the life that was delt to you. White man +50. White woman, - 5. Pretty white woman, +5000. Black, - 50. Black man, - 5000. Large black man, - - 25000. Parents were Crack heads - 100,000. Parents were both radiologists, +100,000. Grew up behind iron curtain - 250000. And so on. This would actually make a fantastic Onion article. But the "white male =auto easy life" thing doesn't really anger me as much as it j…
/r/MensRights01/09/14 03:06 AM
60

So if a woman says nothing but strips nude in front of you, then takes your clothes off, and engages in intercourse with you, can she then technically come back and claim she was raped? Couldn't you also then claim that you were raped, if you didn't say "yes" too? Two people legally raping each other. Amazing. This is idiotic.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 04:12 AM
1

Your problem is having an ideology to begin with. If your entire sociopolitical world view can be described by a single word, it goes a long way towards describing how sophisticated it is. I refuse to use a word to even describe my views. Perhaps I am an antiideologist, if I were to just make something up. But I wager that you, like me, are in line with most left of center thoughts economically. And most liberal thoughts concerning social justice. But you feel that feminism needs challenged very…
/r/MensRights17/08/14 04:30 AM
0

This is pretty silly to be angry over. And it's pretty easy to fix. If every HR department in the country uses "spouse or partner" in setting up health benefits , I see no reason why they can't just be as inclusive as possible and say "father or partner." Everyone is included... everyone is important.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 02:51 AM
3

This comment shouldn't be downvoted, even if its erroneous. The myth that Viagra is covered under the Affordable Care Act is very common and rarely shot down. Downvoting isn't a "punish for being wrong" button. Its to weed out useless posts. To the top with it.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 07:31 AM
11

No it doesn't. Some insurers may cover it, but the vast majority do not. It is considered a "lifestyle drug" and may be omitted from coverage. I see it every day, I'm a retail pharmacist. And when it IS covered, it is most typically only 6 tablets a month. So I hope you only want to have sex 6 days out of 30. Sometimes 4, sometimes 3...and sometimes they will pay for a months worth of the once daily dose of Cialis! Its variable. But it isn't considered an "entitlement" like womens' reproductive …
/r/MensRights08/07/14 05:24 AM
5

Obama isn't even close to being a horrible president. Give me a break. Look at the stuff someone like what Warren Harding did and its laughable they are even in the same breath. If the economy keeps improving, Obama will be judged pretty kindly by history. This is mostly because our central bank worked brilliantly to nip a potential depression in the bud, but he will get the credit. To be fair, he has worked with a pretty terrible legislative branch for several years. I personally feel he's been…
/r/MensRights08/07/14 05:10 AM
1

In no way do I disagree.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 11:49 AM
2

With the exception of, arguably, Native Americans and Appalachians, being a Black man is pretty much the position of having the deck most stacked against you in the United States on average. Our culture expects them to be poor in academia. The horrific educational rates in this demographic are disgusting. It is the #1 issue for me in relation to gender equality -- the lack of educational expectation and achievement of the male gender. It's not something that affects just black men, it's all men.…
/r/MensRights22/06/14 04:04 AM
2

Feminism doesn't even mean anything anymore. Its like the War on Terror. I have no idea what people are even fighting against. The term has become so nebulous that its meaningless. Its like the word "hipster."
/r/MensRights06/05/14 12:27 AM
3

I like Reddit because of the discussion it has. You can find topics about everything and it's great. But I honestly find upvoting, downvoting, karma, and the rest of that nonsense to just be pointless noise. I wish they would just do away with it. I'm not a fan of the democratization of thought.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 05:37 AM
5

So men are raped and not believed because of "the patriarchy." At some point, you'd have to think that they would realize that this hypothesis of theirs is silly. Yes. Men are raped and not believed because the world is set up by the Illuminati or whatever to always favor men. That totally makes sense and isn't ridiculous.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 09:27 AM
4

This shows the hypocrisy of the Reddit feminism board. On one hand, they claim they are for total equality and that mens' rights is a duplicitous subject. Then, on the other hand, any time a man is brought up in any way other than as an abuser of some sort, it is dismissed because it has nothing to do with women. And they wonder why men who reject their preordained societal roles feel like they need their own movement. Ideally, everyone who cares would identify as an egalitarian, but I honestly …
/r/MensRights25/04/14 04:38 AM
3

Like I've posted numerous times, "feminism" doesn't mean anything anymore. You can be a "feminist" and be a disgusting bigot, or you can be a "feminist" and be a decent human being that actually wants to end suffering for everyone. They all claim they do, naturally. And many fall short. Some, however, actually do walk the walk. And they are good people. We do need to spend time identifying the non-bigoted feminists. When people approach the subject of the human rights of men with an open mind, I…
/r/MensRights19/04/14 04:49 AM
33

That's because it isn't. I don't care what some phony in the White House decides to propagandize. And for each blind left winged lie, there are right winged fools that think men should remain boxed into their cultural expectations of provider and protector of others. Both sides of the left-right spectrum are disgustingly wrong on their opinion of "where a man's place is." That's precisely the problem. Plus, the left-right dichotomy is false in and of itself, anyway. Its just a way to get sheep t…
/r/MensRights17/04/14 04:08 PM
8

I call myself an egalitarian, but it sounds similar to you. I just honestly think that men and boys are heading towards a social crisis and need help in things like educational attainment, freeing themselves from the chains of gender norms & expectations, unemployment, mental health, etc. And this is the only place that wants to recognize it without some sort of ridiculous caveat. I consider myself an anti-ideologist, yet I seem to align more with the left on most social and economic issues...bu…
/r/MensRights16/04/14 12:12 PM
4

I don't think this sub is right leaning at all. It doesn't lean. Its really a collective of everything. And I rather like that because it indicates to me that its not some sort of political groupthought. It really is just a bunch of individuals concerned about the rights of men and boys.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 07:20 PM
2

I've made a similar argument before. Under the eyes of federal law, a woman's access to birth control is now actually seen as more of a right than a person's right to live. Imagine a person has a a rare sort of heart arrhythmia that requires seeing a Cardiologist several times a year and several brand name maintenance medications. They will pay $100 a month to see that specialist and several hundred more for their brand-name only meds. A few thousand a year. Now imagine a woman wants to avoid pr…
/r/MensRights01/04/14 05:43 PM
12

Its the definition some in the feminist movement gave it. North Korea is a democratic republic if you ask them. But Feminism, by large, is a very nebulous movement in and of itself. Some that wear the "feminist" banner are actually true egalitarians. Others aren't. It's one reason the term "feminism" should just be retired. Too many ideologies encompass it. You can be a person that thinks men are discriminated just as much as women or you can be a psycho that thinks men should all be castrated a…
/r/MensRights21/03/14 03:54 PM
2

Which means that 71% of mothers expect someone to come along and take care of them. Which, the majority of the time (assuming some are lesbians), would be a man. It appears that the majority of women surely don't have any problem at all penciling men into their traditional gender role of "provider for women and children" do they? It goes to show that there isn't a wage gap, there is a "mother's desire to succeed professionally" gap. When will women begin to take the baton and work as much and as…
/r/MensRights18/02/14 04:45 AM
1

And if, as the statistics claim, the average man works 6 hours more than the average woman a week, the average man loses 585 days of his life over a 45 year career. Why can't women work as much as men? Or maybe expect men to work less? Id love to only work 36 hours a week rather than 44, but my job requires that much commitment. I just want equality. Where are the female coal miners and garbage men? Show them to me, show me women that want to work as long and in as perilous condiions as most blu…
/r/MensRights01/02/14 06:29 PM
1

You should see the bathrooms at the West Virginia University football stadium. The mens room only has troughs the size of bathtubs. Like a couple dozen of them in each mens' room. About 8 dudes will literally stand next to each other, shoulder to shoulder, peeing into the same tub, urine splashing everywhere. It is disgusting, but if you have to go its that or wait 20 minutes for one of the few stalls to open up. The women get more restrooms and actual private stalls, naturally. Which they shoul…
/r/MensRights10/12/13 04:05 AM
1

What amazes me is that usually its the OPPOSITE of this. Specialties and those that "run" them usually want to expand their scope of practice, not restrict it. If there was ever a mens' rights issue that I would hope everyone with a shred of empathy and logic would support, this is it.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 03:18 PM
2

It would annoy me that someone would get a vacation for a voluntary medical procedure. My wife and I are child free by choice and we don't like how people who think they get to have children consequence free can have all of the career and financial perks of a person that focuses on their career. If those who do not have children were allowed to draw social security or retire how ever many months earlier than the amount of months the average parents get off for child vacation or something similar…
/r/MensRights01/11/13 10:51 AM
1

This would never work in the US. I could just imagine the one in downtown Philly. Every vagrant in town would be packed in there watching TV and eating free hot dogs in the temperature controlled comfort of Ikea all day, every day. Hobo heaven.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 11:52 PM
1

You can see how bad reading comprehension was for boys imply by looking at my old report cards. Up until the 8th grade, my reading skills were terrible. Bs and Cs in English while I got As in everything else. My math, science, and reasoning abilities were always in the upper 90th percentiles, but the test scores on reading for me were always terrible; 30th or 40th percentile. Then I got home access to the internet. I was able to read WHATEVER I WANTED TO. By 9th grade, I was getting much better …
/r/MensRights29/10/13 12:14 PM
3

I really don't understand why some women think all men are all these stereotypical stoic, fearless machines with no situational awareness. Anybody that is behind me at 2AM scares me a bit, too, ladies. Having a penis doesn't allow me to stroll around carefree in the middle of the night. Unfortunately, I know I can be mugged at any point, too. And it doesn't matter if its a man or a woman out at that time. If a 5' tall woman tells me she has a gun, she transforms into a 7' tall body builder with …
/r/MensRights29/10/13 09:23 AM
1

My wife and I are child free by choice. Few issues anger me more than this. I wish I got 3 months off of work for something that is 100% voluntary. (Unless there is an issue of rape and inability to abort. Which is incredibly rare, but those hypothetical people would obviously get a pass in my mind.) I'd be fine with it if people who worked hard and never took baby vacation got to retire early. Say the average person has 2.3 kids. If I could, say, draw social security 2.3 kids worth of off time …
/r/MensRights07/10/13 11:40 AM
6

This is just people getting pissed off over nothing. The dude doesn't want anyone on the committee that has never played the collegiate game. Very, very, VERY few women have played the game. And usually only as a kicker. Though this does beg another question -- why aren't the feminists trying to actually correct the problem? I think it would be cool to have girls football in high school. It would also let title IX take care of itself with all those scholarships needed to field a womens' team, to…
/r/MensRights06/10/13 07:50 PM
3

I have no problem with the premise of the Affordable Care Act. Healthcare is something that few can afford on their own when catastrophe happens. That its being put on the shoulders of young men, already years behind financially due to the stupidity of the baby boomers and their "recession," is the most egregious. Its simply generational warfare towards the benefit of the boomers. Again. When you think about it, pretty much everything is done to benefit them. But what really gets me is that corp…
/r/MensRights03/10/13 04:10 PM
2

Pretty good until the patriarchy hypothesis was introduced. I really don't understand why that nonsense persists. Its such a ridiculous way to describe the power systems of the past. The world is what its always been. People are placed into positions where they best help those with power, be it economic, political, religious, or whatever. Nothing has changed in the power dynamic. The only thing that changed is the dynamic of labor. But this is a discussion for another time. Also, I hate that the…
/r/MensRights03/10/13 01:22 AM
29

TIL I don't need a wallet, keys, cellphone, or the need to avoid areas where a potential crime could happen to me. To be serious...do some women really think we don't avoid dangerous areas or that we don't stay vigilant in sparsely populated areas out of fear of being violently attacked ourselves? Is the penis some sort of magical anti-crime device I didn't know about?
/r/MensRights23/09/13 07:56 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter