Tripticket Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
13	Things Women Secretly Desire In The Bedroom (BUT Are Afraid To Say) Interesting that AI also uses 'triplets'. It was taught to me in high school ("rule of threes") as an aesthetically pleasing writing device.	/r/seduction	13/03/26 08:43 PM
2	40 first dates, 1 second date, 0 long term prospects... Can anyone relate? Eh, autistic people can have friends and live a normal life too. You seem highly functioning. I'm not trying to make it out to be easy because it's not. But it is doable.	/r/seduction	04/01/26 04:01 PM
5	40 first dates, 1 second date, 0 long term prospects... Can anyone relate? If I may, I think that's a waste of money. A scam, even. A dating coach can't give you anything that a normal social life also wouldn't be able to. Having a functioning social life is also important in order to have a romantic life, so you'll want to have a social life regardless. As you develop a better social intuition, things like when physical touch is natural will come by itself. Your autism might make this more challenging, but there's no better way to learn than through experience. By way…	/r/seduction	04/01/26 02:09 PM
1	Finally approached No, you can't infer that. It's just Reddit culture to speak in absolute terms. When someone says "100%" or "absolutely" or something similar, just imagine it as shorthand for "I have no idea whatsoever, but I would like this to be the case" and you're usually pretty close to what people actually mean.	/r/seduction	03/01/26 11:46 AM
4	How I went from being a virgin to having meetings and sex. Money is explicitly instrumentally valuable, not inherently valuable. Unless you're Uncle Scrooge.	/r/seduction	31/12/25 09:46 AM
11	Anyone ever experienced a random dude interrupt and hit on your date? You don't even need to embarrass him. If the girl has accepted to go on out on a date with you, you should be able to be confident enough to not get irked by someone else butting in. I'd react to it the same way as I'd react to someone trying to talk to my date non-romantically. She's there to talk to you, not to some random dude. And if she somehow ditches you for the random dude, then good riddance. Showing her that you don't even consider the other guy to be competition leads, in my opinion, …	/r/seduction	23/06/25 03:30 PM
2	How do you “seduce” women when you’re an obese autistic virgin in your thirties? Lastly, I do use deodorant every day, but that wears off very quickly when you sweat as much as I do. If you don't already, try an anti-perspirant deodorant. By the way: would these outfits only be for when I’m trying to go out to meet people? A general rule is "always be at your best" - because you never know when opportunity strikes. Besides, if you think you look good in some clothing, wearing it will make you feel good (or maybe "better" is more appropriate here). Feeling good about yourself…	/r/seduction	01/02/25 11:02 PM
3	How do you “seduce” women when you’re an obese autistic virgin in your thirties? I found an effective treatment for sweet tooth is to not have any such products in the house. Usually, going out only for sweets is a much bigger threshold and when I tell myself I'm walking to the store only to get pastries I feel ridiculous and don't do it. I only go to the store when I'm not hungry and I always make a shopping list that I adhere to. I switched sweets to chewing gum (xylitol chewing gums should be plentiful in Sweden - although liberal consumption of xylitol can have a laxativ…	/r/seduction	01/02/25 10:39 PM
8	She is USING you if you are in the friendzone, this is why... I think it describes the way he writes some parts, but even if you were a progressive feminist you might take issue with the structure of 'friendzoning'. It's a relationship that's inherently based on a power imbalance and where one party will be perpetually unsatisfied.	/r/seduction	12/10/24 03:19 PM
2	Next time try supporting your own? Doesn't all this just imply that they're roughly in the same category quality-wise? I agree that there's room for discussion, but in order to make the case that she was snubbed, it seems to me that her movie would have to be noticeably superior to at least one of the other ones. Someone's got to draw the short straw, after all.	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/02/20 12:16 AM
1	She got off with one year Maybe for you. I have no idea how long such a case could drag out for in the US, but I'm not sure I could be bothered if it proves costly.	/r/PussyPassDenied	11/11/19 09:16 PM
1	She got off with one year Sure, but you might have to pay out of pocket for all the court shenanigans because she doesn't have any money. For a lot of people, vengeance or pettiness doesn't seem worth the effort in time and money.	/r/PussyPassDenied	11/11/19 09:10 PM
2	She got off with one year Have you heard of Mill's free exchange of ideas? Basically, by treating people with questionable ideas with attempts to silence them, it makes it seem like there are no proper answers to their complaints. This can be more legitimizing to their views than it would be to have an open discussion with them. Furthermore, most ideas have a reasonable basis, even if many of its adherents don't understand what is reasonable about the idea. For example, socialism is an ideology that has valid points, but…	/r/PussyPassDenied	11/11/19 09:06 PM
6	She got off with one year Nor in Finland. But the mother may be eligible to pay child support if the father somehow against all odds manages to become the primary caretaker, although IIRC it's contingent on her also making more money than the father.	/r/PussyPassDenied	11/11/19 07:49 PM
3	She got off with one year A rock doesn't bleed. In certain cases, the costs of going to court won't even be covered. Where I'm from, the perpetrator is still entitled to a "minimum livable wage" before she's forced to give anything up. She will never have an incentive to get a better job if the damages are high, because she knows it'd take several decades to pay off.	/r/PussyPassDenied	11/11/19 07:45 PM
2	She got off with one year That's not what he said though. If you're being generous to his statement (which you should be when you're dismissing someone else's opinions that may or may not be well-founded) then it's not even a necessary implication of anything he's said so far.	/r/PussyPassDenied	11/11/19 07:41 PM
1	There is a difference I'm not sure I'd agree about your claim on "most Christians". There's almost a billion Protestants around and plenty of Catholics should know him. But Luther is much more formative to Christianity than modern popular preachers and the like. The other point is that some rando might not know Luther, but we're all post-Lutherans even though we don't know what he did. In the same way, not everyone knows who Newton is, but we can't escape his influence even though he might mostly be discussed by phys…	/r/PussyPassDenied	09/10/19 02:27 AM
1	There is a difference Should we analyze modern Christianity through the lens of writings from 13th century? Ideas evolve. We actually do - the church fathers and the writings of theologians like Augustinus and Martin Luther are constantly debated. Especially Catholic theologians like going back to look at papal precedent from different times because it's relevant to how their religion is structured. Which is unsurprising because I've never claimed to read that book. You claimed the opposite, which is why I felt comfo…	/r/PussyPassDenied	09/10/19 01:36 AM
1	There is a difference Having done coursework in the matter, I should think I have some experience of other authors. But I find it laughable that you're rejecting the basis of an ideology just because it's old (and it's not even that old). It's not like her main talking points are about legal issues that were current two generations ago - but you wouldn't know that since you haven't read the book. As for practical applications - I'm not sure what you mean. Do you mean things like forced workshops for men and gender qu…	/r/PussyPassDenied	09/10/19 12:19 AM
2	There is a difference Let it go. You can't win against this guy's arguments because they're pseudo-scientific in nature. Whenever there's a new issue in society he's going to modify the ideology to claim that patriarchy has constructed the problem. Gender quotas are patriarchy in the same way as forcing women to stay at home in the same way as laissez-faire etc. etc.	/r/PussyPassDenied	09/10/19 12:11 AM
1	There is a difference De Beauvoir is still relevant for feminism and the basis for a lot of "modern" theory. Most philosophy doesn't really have an expiration date (unless it actually is philosophically useless, but that would make any work with the same basis have a similarly low value). But I guess that only goes to show your limited knowledge of the subject. I think it's especially ironic since you're actually trying to discuss a topic you admit you're not familiar with.	/r/PussyPassDenied	05/10/19 04:05 PM
1	There is a difference I suppose we'll be forced to agree to disagree on how to weigh original sources then. Either way, I'm off to bed, have a good night/day or whatever the appropriate comment is for your time zone. Edit: Actually, do we have any original records from Pontius himself at all? I don't recall coming across any. Guess I'll have to go check the library on Monday.	/r/PussyPassDenied	05/10/19 06:01 AM
3	There is a difference Tacitus died less than a hundred years after Christ's death, so it would be quite a feat if he managed to write the passage over a hundred years after Jesus' death. These sources are also close enough to Jesus' lifetime that people who read the texts would have been alive and aware of the unrest in Judaea. Thus, the historians couldn't just make this shit up without secondary sources mentioning it. This is taught in any introductory level history class at university. At least one passage of his …	/r/PussyPassDenied	05/10/19 04:57 AM
1	There is a difference Perhaps you should follow your own advice and get more acquainted with feminist theory. The general method of argumentation in her work is quite clear and in general simpler to understand as well as more straightforward than Sartre (although I recommend a basic understanding of Being and Nothingness before delving into de Beauvoir because she lifts so much from Sartre). The issue is not voting rights for women or even abolishment of gender roles (which honestly is quite a controversial philosoph…	/r/PussyPassDenied	05/10/19 02:19 AM
8	There is a difference Tacitus is more or less a contemporary of Christ and mentions Jesus. He's generally considered a credible source on most matters, this included. IIRC, Josephus also mentions Jesus.	/r/PussyPassDenied	05/10/19 02:05 AM
2	There is a difference I'm just about to finish my degree in philosophy and did some courses on the matter. Of course, I'm no expert on anything, but I have some experience with the source material. I remain (tentatively) convinced that de Beauvoir is the only major philosopher I've ever read that genuinely didn't contribute much philosophically (whereas my default stance if I disagree with a philosopher is that I simply don't understand what they mean). Of course, that depends on what one thinks of as a contribution,…	/r/PussyPassDenied	04/10/19 11:17 PM
127	There is a difference The thing about feminist theory (or at least as portrayed by Simone de Beauvoir in the Second Sex) in situations such as these is that they're all based on the premise that the "world" is existentially created by men for men (and the definition for "man" then becomes the one that gets to decide what our perception of the world should be). Men have an interest in subjugating women because they want to stay in power. When women feel the need to be clothed a certain way (or anything else they might…	/r/PussyPassDenied	04/10/19 06:15 PM
4	UK: Innocent student wrongly accused of rape calls for anonymity for sex assault defendants until they are found guilty. I'm not sure what the rules are like in North America, but where I'm from there's something called "journalist's integrity". One of the primary rules is to not publish names of the people involved if the information could harm them or their image in any way unless it is deemed to be of utmost importance to he public to know a person's identity. This implies that if you go on a murdering spree, the media will probably publish your name. If you are awaiting trial because you allegedly poisoned you…	/r/MensRights	18/12/17 09:45 PM
1	Literally Hitler... I suppose the rationale behind this phenomenon is that the only legitimate form of hate speech and actions is if it directed towards hateful groups in order to preserve a non-hateful environment. It's a little bit flawed, but there it is. It works if you are an extreme utilitarian and there's a net reduction of hate.	/r/MensRights	13/11/17 05:44 PM