TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Trotrot Archive

View 1 post and 133 comments by Trotrot on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Well, they can't convict just for being a horrible person, so they have to come up with something legitimate. They could also throw perjury at her if she testified in court, and wasting of public resources / filing a false police report. Also, the man can file a civil case against both her, the police department, and the media for slander, libel, and his loss of job.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 12:57 PM
2

What is sarcasm?
/r/MensRights29/08/14 07:18 PM
22

Except there's been no doxxing or "witchhunts", other than calls for them to be fired, which if these allegations are true (And they are, because there's concrete fucking evidence), they should be fired then, and they should lose all public credibility, because they have obviously shown they have none.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 01:53 AM
1

Again, article that only reaches the female side, and ignores the male side. Do people forget that traditional gender roles effect both sexes? Males are the disposable gender, and females are the precious baby-makers that need to be protected. They want to get rid of one side of the coin, but not the other.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 06:00 PM
6

I find that Feminists, and SJWs as a whole, are very vulnerable to Poe's Law and Black Propaganda. I could probably create a whole 8.5x11" page list of times they've been majorly trolled over the past couple years.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 05:50 PM
1

Compared to what is usually written about us, she was practically acting as our prophet. Unfortunately (like most females) she is incapable of empathy, and could not fathom why the men there would be so jaded, making jokes like that, and being so defensive and stiff around her.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 09:35 AM
1

didn't say it was right, just saying the way it is right now. Traditional gender roles suck.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 08:55 AM
1

men are the disposable gender, so it's easier for people to see them fighting and dying than women.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 01:36 AM
1

I just set up an appointment to get a vasectomy last week, and I have no regrets. This is just more confirmation of why I'm doing it. Donated a few samples to the sperm bank to ensure my genes pass on.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 03:05 AM
1

I think this might be a case of your specific unit and chain of command then. I'm in Korea with the Army right now, and yes, they do have us go through SHARP (Sexual Harrasment/Assualt Response & Prevention) classes pretty often, but it's never blatantly "Guys, raping girls is bad m'kay". In fact, my First Sergeant, whenever he gives a quick SHARP blurb during our Friday safety brief, he always makes sure to say that both victims and predators are not limited to one gender. And the last time tha…
/r/MensRights10/06/14 07:25 AM
1

It may be because I used my military e-mail address. it makes me seem more "official", and also has a funny knack of scaring people into replying that normally wouldn't. For example, I sent an e-mail using my g-mail account to a company requesting they refund my new laptop which had been damaged during shipment, which I had insurance for. No response. Send the same request using my military e-mail. This comment was typed on my new new laptop.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 06:25 AM
1

This is you.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 10:39 PM
3

UPDATE: I sent Mr. Hinshaw an e-mail, and he responded to me, linking several articles where the WSJ had stories covering Boko Haram that go back quite a while, including a couple stories on their mass-murders of young boys.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 01:05 AM
1

To us they are. to the people who made them, they're SRS BSNS.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 01:46 PM
1

Are you sure it's fixed? For me, It's still the same sexist crap as the screenshot.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 01:35 PM
1

Because there are a lot of laws that are present in the military, but not in the civilian sector. Lawyers and judges have to be specially trained to handle military cases. To simplify things, they keep civilian and military court separate. But, that doesn't mean soldiers are "above the law" as you said. In fact, service members can be convicted in a civilian court, if they commit a crime that is either not on the military books, or if the place of the crime was not on military jurisdiction. Some…
/r/MensRights19/05/14 01:27 PM
1

Didn't see your other post. Glad you were able to come to terms with yourself. Hope you're feeling a little more positive about life now. I know I did, when I came to terms with my own issues with dating and relationships (was having troubles accepting my bi-sexuality, so I was forcing myself to chase after women, ended up in some pretty crappy situations because of it).
/r/MensRights19/05/14 01:18 PM
1

Army has it's own legal system, and you are appointed a military lawyer. all of it is payed for with tax dollars, no charges are made to either the plaintiff or the defendant. As for damages to reputation, the army keeps legal proceedings very hush hush, especially SHARP (Sexual Harassment / Assault Response & Prevention) cases. it is only made public once the verdict comes out. it doesn't stop rumors from spreading, but it's not officially put-out, so he can't push for that either.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 02:11 PM
2

Current Enlisted here, the Army doesn't fire you before you're found guilty, and you get paid regardless of whether you're doing your job or sitting through court hearings, so pushing for reparations in that aspect is moot.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 02:09 PM
1

they didn't "fuck you", you agreed to have sex with them. Maybe you agreed too quickly for your own tastes, and to rationalize it so you don't end up loathing yourself, you dump the blame on them. It's a common tactic that many women use. Or maybe you just have bad taste in men, and they really are just using you. maybe it's both. who knows, except you and your partners.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 01:56 PM
6

BH is still very much a radical militant group, the truth of the matter does nothing to lessen their "villainous role". But you are right that they're trying to spin the story so that Nigeria looks like the good guys, when in fact both of them have done despicable actions.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 01:17 PM
8

Then start calling out those among your peers who are too far off the edge. point out the error in their views, and if they refuse to listen, then convince others to not follow them. As for feminists caring about men's issues, I'll believe it when I see it. which is not at all, from feminism's inception to right now.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 12:05 PM
6

simple fix to this silly problem: Ask your spouse to use a second one to confirm it (you know, the whole "want to be sure, not 100% accurate" line). If legit, she'll have no reason to object. If she's trying to fraud you, she'll refuse (probably most adamantly, as she realizes her plan is starting to backfire).
/r/MensRights08/05/14 01:18 PM
1

Halfway through the story, I already had a prepared thought in my head "Ha, she's probably going to get away scot-free, imagine if it was a guy that did this shit, he would probably get demoted / fired, maybe even a lawsuit". Was pleasantly surprised. Even more surprised to hear that a case where it was a male harrassing I assume a female was treated the same, instead of having a harsher punishment as would typically happen to a male. On a side-note, this might be less of a case of direct sexual…
/r/MensRights07/05/14 11:09 AM
1

I made a self-post a short while ago related to this. The army is pretty forward about the issue, for both males and females. One bit of clarification, the reason for the "spike" in sexual assualts from 2012 to 2013 is not that more service members were assualting one another, it's that more of the assualts were being reported. Starting in early 2013, the army has been pushing it's SHARP program (Sexual Harrassment / Assualt Reponse & Prevention) down everyone's throats. I swear we get briefed a…
/r/MensRights07/05/14 10:47 AM
0

Not a legal sign, therefore no reason to obey it. Same thing with those parking signs in restaruant lots that say "to-go / pickup customers only", no legal authority, no need to obey.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 10:14 AM
1

I have, actually. you get desperate when you're lonely. But you're just a troll, so go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 10:10 AM
2

brool story, co. Not that I don't trust you, but it IS the internet after all. And we fight against disinformation and story-telling, so I would like this to be true, and not some yarn spun up to agitate us. I will refrain from getting all hot and bothered about this until I see something in the news, or some proof is posted here.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 10:08 AM
0

Sense the sarcasm, you do not. more lurk, you should.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 10:06 AM
1

we're married with kids Need clarification there, way you have it worded makes it sound like you two are in fact a couple.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 12:17 PM
1

It's a joke blog. You might as well get upset at The Onion, or Duffelblog (Onion-esque blog focused on military news).
/r/MensRights03/05/14 12:02 PM
1

If you do another fully open, anonymous survey, it'll just get over-run again. Here's a decent idea: Contact a mod, and co-ordinate with them so your next survey post gets stuck to the front page, so everyone can see it. Instead of having the post link to an actual survey it just links to an image of the questions, or even better, is just a self-post with the questions typed out, so no-one can call you out for trying to karma whore or anything. Everyone types their answers out in the comments, a…
/r/MensRights16/04/14 11:05 AM
1

I liked that article. did you write that? Another time, maybe. Need to get to bed soon.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 12:46 PM
17

I'd consider that legal defense for anyone. If you're on meds that make you completely lose control and just go crazy, and trigger libido at the same time, then shit is going to happen. the question is why are such meds even prescribed, and if there is a legitimate reason for it, why is not controlled or required for the patient to be administered the medicine at a hospital or clinic to make sure they don't go crazy in public? Note: I haven't read the story yet, this is just my thoughts on OP's …
/r/MensRights15/04/14 11:53 AM
1

Gender theory...? I'm lost. I didn't take any of those crazy elective courses in high school or college.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 11:47 AM
2

As /u/woah77 said, it's been replaced by Social Security Numbers. They didn't like the idea of giving "serial numbers" to soldiers anymore, it sounded like they were being treated as an object, and not a person. It also makes the whole process smoother, because you only have to remember 2 numbers now, your SSN and EDIPI (Number assigned for your Common Access Card, or CAC).
/r/MensRights15/04/14 11:45 AM
2

Coasties aren't part of the DoD (Even though you should be), so DoD policies don't effect you guys.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 11:41 AM
3

You. I like you. Tagged as soldier-hugger.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 08:52 AM
1

Ahh, I gotcha. Yeah, that is true. And I didn't think you did have that mindset, or else you wouldn't be talking to me so civilly.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 08:40 AM
4

the whole "disposable male" thing is actually not that prominent. It's a volunteer service now. you're not going to attract anyone to sign-up if you treat them like an object. That's why they did away with the service number (you were literally assigned a 7-10 digit number, and that was who you were in the military). Yes, we are soldiers. we are trained to fight, and are prepared to die fighting. But we're also taught to be smart. We're not any good to the military if we end up in a body-bag. Th…
/r/MensRights15/04/14 08:26 AM
1

I'm circumcised, as most of the Americans on this subreddit are. One day in high school, they held an assembly in the gym to raise "awareness" (in other words money from all the rich yuppie parents that lived in my hometown) to fight female forced circumcision in Africa. This sparked a thought in my head "If female forced circumcision is bad, why is male forced circumcision okay?". I had never really given my circumcision much thought. After all, there was nothing I could really do about it. Whe…
/r/MensRights15/04/14 06:52 AM
2

Glad to have you on the team!
/r/MensRights15/04/14 06:33 AM
2

that's what he's saying. that tactic wouldn't be allowed for search and seizures, why is it allowed for collecting DNA?
/r/MensRights14/04/14 10:58 AM
4

Do what I'm doing: contact the three fuck wads who wrote this (not posting info here, don't want to get b& for doxxing), and ask them (politely, they're timid librul yuppies) just what the hell they were thinking when they wrote this. If you can't tell, I'm really fucking pissed off at this.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 04:54 AM
9

What a crock of fucking shit. And that's a crappy comparison as well. Circumcisions are permanent alteration to your body. Vaccines are just a fucking injection, and do nothing to your body other than the whole immunization deal (and maybe leaving a small scar on your shoulder, like the smallpox vaccine). They are not equivalent in the SLIGHTEST. "no long-term adverse effects of circumcision on sexual performance or pleasure" so removing the MOST SENSITIVE part of the penis in no way effects ple…
/r/MensRights13/04/14 04:38 AM
1

That too. But, there are some big assholes out there. I work in public service, and let me tell you, there's A LOT of people in it just for the money / benefits.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 04:24 AM
1

this kind of circle-jerk isn't really productive. We all agree with you, forced circumcision is bad. Instead of lamenting about what was done to you, try to do something about preventing it from happening to other people. Every second you waste crying about it is a second that could be spent actually doing something about the issue.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 04:21 AM
3

I see this as less of female privilege or "pussy pass", and more of public service officials having too much power / protection. Cops get away with some really scummy shit all the time. Sure, if the Fire Lieutenant was a dude and the dead elder was a women, there'd be a bit more fire & brimstone from the media, but nothing would come of it regardless.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 04:13 AM
3

bisex here. you're not alone.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 12:13 PM
2

Male - White - 20 (turn 21 in 2 months) - no religious preference - conservative - marijuana yes - homosexual marriage yes - trans rights yes - abortion yes - socialized medicine no - minimum wage increase no - gun control no - socially men slightly - legally men largely.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 12:06 PM
1

I don't get a lot out of sex, unless I have a strong connection with my partner. I desire intimacy over raw pleasure. I've been in one-night stands, and it felt awkward as hell, and didn't really get anything out of it other than the physical release. Being with someone who so readily sleeps with someone else makes the whole experience feel less important.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 01:36 AM
3

Bingo. Army here, in basic they made use carry our cups with both hands, holding the cup tight to our chest. Didn't realize why the hell they were making us do that till the grenade range.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 01:13 AM
21

way to use an ultimatum there. Not all men like promiscuous women. me included.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 01:03 AM
1

Stuff like this is confusing to label. It's obviously satire, but it could also be black propaganda, or even a case of Poe's Law. It all depends on who came up with it originally. Still funny as shit though.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 05:09 AM
1

Yeah, this is complete bullshit. You're just a moron from a 3rd tier university who only sees the world through a warped lens (hence your inherently low position in the social ranks). Where the hell did that come from? Do I even know you?
/r/MensRights12/02/14 04:39 AM
-2

neglect is still abuse. you may not be physically or verbally harming the child, but not giving a child the proper care, attention and love they need to grow is just as bad. This may just be anecdotal (but when lots of people have the same exact experiences, it starts to become something more than "just anecdotal"), but every single father I've ever met would take time out of their hectic schedule, no matter how much they had to do, to just be with their child/children. Every single mother I've …
/r/MensRights11/02/14 04:45 AM
1

TL;DR For anybody who doesn't want to give the dailymail views. guy has debts from previous marriage. meets girl who's willing to loan him the money for his debts. they break up. she wants her loan back, pronto. he offers to sell his properties to pay her back. she initially agrees, then pulls the rug out from under him and tries to repossess them from him. he responds by flattening the house, cutting the value of the property by half. She tries to have him arrested, but cause the repossession h…
/r/MensRights06/02/14 02:16 PM
1

I don't date people with apple products, and I don't date women in my age group (I'm 20).
/r/MensRights06/02/14 03:03 AM
-1

0/10, made me reply. trolling easily manipulated and coginatively dissonant people on twitter =/= misogyny
/r/MensRights05/10/13 11:47 AM
3

What. I can't comprehend this. This has to be a troll. If there is seriously someone like this, I will give up on this society.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 01:01 AM
1

There can't really be anyone as disconnected from reality as that, right?
/r/MensRights09/09/13 02:29 AM
14

problem is the homeless population is vastly male.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 03:23 AM
0

he was led into believing his child no longer existed.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 11:30 AM
1

she lied to him about the abortion. that counts as paternity fraud.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 02:59 AM
3

you doubt how depraved the paparazzi and tabloids have become.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 11:30 AM
14

that is fraud. get a paternity test to confirm it's yours. then take her to court to get partial custody for the kid if you want it.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 02:28 AM
1

I hope you're joking.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 03:56 AM
7

he's not butthurt at all. he was confused and disappointed when he discovered the reality of the situation, but when he looked in the mirror, he saw how he has changed along his journey. notice how the last panel says "start". that's because it's the start of his new life.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 03:53 AM
7

if you're straight, have the notary be male. if bi/gay, just hire someone who does not look attractive to you. note: why am I responding seriously to an obvious joke.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 04:17 AM
12

if you read the article fully through, it said that is how it is now, with "common-law" marriages it is possible for a court to consider a long-standing couple married for legal, medical, and financial purposes, even if they never really were. you can see the chaos that can easily create. the point to the piece was that they are looking to get rid of common-law marriages. so this is actually a good thing.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 03:23 PM
2

he was iffy about it. for example, with repealing DOMA, he pushed about it a bit, but when congress ignored him he just gave up. DODT was going to be repealed regardless of his support for it, because the war in iraq was drawing a lot of attention to the military, and it was finally getting through the thick skulls of 'muricans that it was fundamentally wrong.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 03:17 PM
1

okay. btw, with your previous comment, you raised an interesting point. if the cost of saving one or a few lives reaches an absurd level, and could potentially put many other lives at risk, it would seem more logical to accept the one or few losses.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 04:57 PM
7

you were straw-manning his point. his point is that with the highest GDP in the fucking world, we shouldn't have so many poor and homeless people. you took it as "anything that makes a profit on potential human death is bad".
/r/MensRights25/10/12 04:22 PM
13

way to strawman. that's extrapolating way too far.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 04:01 PM
2

out of curiosity, what did their comment say?
/r/MensRights24/10/12 12:19 PM
2

outside of a date-rape scenario I mean.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 05:56 PM
2

is it possible for someone to sleep heavily enough for vaginal intercourse to not wake them up?
/r/MensRights23/10/12 12:45 PM
6

the response in the comments is pathetic, but the situation itself isn't really an issue. was it wrong of her? yes. did her partner care? no. this is usually the case. in a healthy relationship, situations like this are practically expected. if your partner goes to bed before you do, when you finally hit the hay, are you just going to lay like a board next to them because they didn't consent to cuddling/spooning before they went to sleep? now, again, she did take it a bit too far, but partners u…
/r/MensRights23/10/12 12:43 PM
8

taking photos of people in public is not illegal in anyway whatsoever. if it was, the paparazzi could not exist.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 04:34 PM
6

has that debt transfered to you?
/r/MensRights13/10/12 04:29 PM
26

which is why I said "stay classy, misandry" instead of "stay classy, gawker.com". though I imagine if they really tried they could find a photo, this is the internet after all.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 10:13 PM
4

she was seriously crying for hours because you were walking on the wrong side of the sidewalk. I hope you're using hyperbole. and if not, I hope you left her quickly after that.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 08:20 PM
130

and the article uses a picture of a man robbing a woman at the top of the page. stay classy, misandry.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 08:15 PM
-8

friedman was a scumbag. his economic ideas are responsible for so much chaos and strife around the globe, including the U.S.A. this was one of the few good things he did. edit: seems some people need to learn their history. look up "The Shock Doctrine".
/r/MensRights30/09/12 01:00 PM
1

shhh, don't give them ideas.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 08:54 PM
42

damn optimists always ruining the circlejerk.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 06:39 PM
8

answers.yahoo.com I'm not even going to open the link. if you take yahoo answers seriously, you have a problem.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 01:32 AM
0

yeah. it's baby steps. well, I've got business to attend to, good luck with your activism and life. be safe.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 09:01 PM
-1

typical feminazi: presented with data that conflicts with your agenda? go fucking bat-shit crazy. good thing you avoided serious injury.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 08:51 PM
0

that's why you have to record the incident. any time you are out doing some activist activities, or are at a debate or function or something, have a friend stay back a bit and with some form of recording device ready. if things start getting heated, have them whip it out. also, I'm sorry for your injuries. hope your wrist healed without any serious damage.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 08:31 PM
8

but on reddit, if you post a story without citation and expect people to believe you, you usually get called out for it.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 08:29 PM
14

everyone on 4chan is anonymous, that's why it's relevant.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 07:44 PM
1

We here do it. it's actually quite easy. and if you do face physical assualt, record the incident, report it to the police, and have them arrested. since you're a female, the police will take it seriously, unlike for us.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 07:37 PM
1

Humanist, egalitarian, or if they have the (pardon the expression) balls, they can call themselves MRA's.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 07:24 PM
16

That's not what I meant at all. all 4chan posts are by default "anonymous", regardless of if you use a tripcode or not. there are no profiles or accounts on 4chan. unless the person provides information, you cannot know who they are.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 07:21 PM
117

It's a story without any citation, made by an anonymous poster on 4chan. Atheos is right in taking the story with a grain of salt. that being said, if the situation was real, then yes, without that camera he would be in jail.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 07:12 PM
4

who knows, maybe when presented with raw data from several unbiased studies, they might suddenly realize their myopic view of the situation is just that.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 07:28 PM
3

I feel like posting this to SRS, just to see what happens.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 06:46 PM
6

break down the numbers. 1/4 of the couples studied were violent. half of those were reciprocal (both partners are violent to each other). in a reciprocal situation, there does have to be an aggressor, but it's hard to determine which one it is, and you're just speculating that it's probably male initiation. now, what you conveniently ignored was the non-reciprocal side. reciprocal violence was only half of the total violent couples. 70% of the non-reciprocal violence was female-on-male. only 30%…
/r/MensRights02/08/12 05:31 PM
1

Well see, for the believer, they get to die thinking they're going to whatever afterlife (funny how every religion has one, huh? trying to not be anti-theist here though) for their faith. once you fully die, your brain functioning stops, and that's it. when you're dead, you're dead. there's no recognizing the fact that you're dead, because you're fucking dead. so to that believer who just passed away, if there is no afterlife after all, they will not be disappointed, because the last thing they …
/r/MensRights31/07/12 05:10 AM
0

there's two feminist movements. traditional feminism, and radical feminism, or radfem (facism would also fit). the two have become merged however. traditional feminism is the typical, misinformed jargons and cliches that has spread around since the beginning of it, and is heavily based on the marxist idea of using some powerful entity to blame for the troubles of the world, for marxism it's the bourgeoisie, in feminism's case it is men (this is where those "why are men so violent/rape so much/so…
/r/MensRights31/07/12 04:29 AM
1

they also oppose shelters for men who are suffering from spousal abuse, and more fair custody options for men in divorces/separations.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 04:16 AM
2

qwestion FTFY
/r/MensRights31/07/12 03:57 AM
11

the issue here isn't they're thinking "he's giving our kids candy", they think "he's buttering our children up so he can buttfuck them." and that's fucking horrible to assume of someone just because they're male.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 04:16 PM
2

good point, I guess.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 08:50 PM
4

bad grammar nazi, bad.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 08:44 PM
1

that "shevil feminazi" @oetry1 was probably a troll.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 06:41 PM
4

I called it.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 01:45 AM
4

15/7/2012, the day reddit cried.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 07:00 PM
3

it shows those watching it are about evenly matched on opinions about the subject.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 05:27 PM
1

third comment from the top: This video ignores the fact that girls and women are socialized >differently, treated differently and actively persuaded and groomed >to make different choices based strictly on their gender. Sexism (discrimination against women because they are female and >for no other reason) exists and is a big reason why the earning gap exists. It is not a "myth. " did they not watch the same video we did? the video directly addressed those exact things. I just don't understand so…
/r/MensRights14/07/12 02:00 AM
-1

Stop upvoting this please. it's not legit. get this off of the front page.
/r/MensRights14/07/12 01:52 AM
11

that'sthejoke.jpg
/r/MensRights13/07/12 11:40 PM
5

if he does post this there, I want a link so I can see what kind of responses he gets.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 05:45 PM
3

no. it does happen. for both males and females. what happens in males is oxytocin and testosterone react, producing a latent chemical that has no effect on the brain or body, so the post-coital effect is reduced in males. it's still prominent in child rearing though because in that situation much more oxytocin is produced, enough to counter the testosterone.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 08:30 PM
1

In the "Ten lies women tell men" article, #7: women are intuitive like a nuclear power plant is radioactive so, that's not at all, and the only time they are, it was a fluke/horrible mistake? and then #10. if a guy came home with a new surround sound system, sale or not, the women would raise a fucking bitch fit till he returned it.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 10:17 PM
1

if this story was reversed (except for the pregnancy bit, though we could say that the rock star girl got pregnant and got an abortion against his wishes), prudie's advice would have been to delete the photos and move on. but cause it's a woman, she advises trying to get money out of the situation.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 10:12 PM
3

TIER 3 RULES
/r/MensRights30/06/12 08:42 PM
1

I don't know about you, but I turn down girls like that. I want a relationship, not a quick fuck. I can keep my libido under control, and I have enough experience to know how to perform when the time finally comes, so no worries about getting "rusty". I don't really understand this obsession with sex present in this society.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 08:30 PM
16

and guys get free viagra and prostate exams when we get older. what's so bad here?
/r/MensRights28/06/12 05:19 PM
1

height discrimination is very strong. I've met women who've said they wouldn't even consider dating a guy who's under 6 feet.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 01:47 AM
1

my brother: "why do you take so long in the shower, are you a fag or something?" me: "because I want to make sure I'm clean, so I stay healthy?" my brother: "yeah right, you were probably using the shower head to shoot water up your ass you fucking fruit cake."
/r/MensRights24/06/12 01:44 AM
1

just because ignorant people will take issue with it when it's a girl, doesn't mean we should when it's a guy. in my book, comedy is comedy, there's nothing you shouldn't make fun of.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 02:32 PM
1

maybe we're looking a bit too into this? if this game had a more serious tone to it, I'd understand analyzing it. but a zombie killer cheerleader running around with the re-animated head of her boyfriend strapped to her hip, with humor on par with a high school cafeteria, does not a serious game make.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 03:46 AM
1

ruined in the fact that whenever she tries to get a job, loan, buy a car or house with credit, or anything of that sort, when they do the necessary digging, she'll pop up on the sex offender watch list, and if she doesn't have absolutely stellar credit, or an amazing resume (don't have the time to go hunting in my font directory for the e with the squiggly stuff above it), she'll be rejected.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 05:41 PM
3

while the pathetic sentence time is well, pathetic, she's still going to be labeled a sex offender for the rest of her life, so her life is equally ruined as if she was a guy. she just won't be in the slammer for very long.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 03:33 AM
0

views like this are why critics of us think we're a bunch of misogynists and chauvinists.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 06:18 PM
1

you.... what are you doing here.
/r/MensRights02/06/12 05:24 AM
5

Good, I guess?
/r/MensRights31/05/12 11:49 PM
0

most of the first will probably die depends on who's side your on. the victor usually has less casualties. exception is the soviet union, since they believed in quantity over quality. they literally just threw whole battalions into machine gun and artillery fire, hence why they had the highest casualty rate of any single nation involved in WWII
/r/MensRights31/05/12 11:45 PM
3

"the best way to show your love for the troops is to ask your politicians to send them home." don't remember who said this, I might have the quote wrong cause google isn't finding it, but damn, is it relevant.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 11:42 PM
2

If someone is trying to kill you, then I don't see any problem with killing them first to defend yourself. you don't need to jump to that, non-lethal alternatives are preferred, but if it's necessary to protect yourself and/or others, then you must do it.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 01:56 PM
1

I don't get it.... sarcasm?
/r/MensRights23/05/12 04:38 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter