TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TrueEvenIfUdenyIt Archive

View 7 posts and 246 comments by TrueEvenIfUdenyIt on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Discussion heavy is a code phrase for intellectually lazy.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 12:41 PM
2

Theories emerge based on an abundance of facts. Theories are not separate from facts. The facts in this case are well-known. The sources are legion. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1998/11/981112075159.htm
/r/MensRights08/01/13 11:54 PM
4

You don't know what the word theory means, do you? It is a fact that some events described as suicide attempts are undertaken with the intent to die. It is also a fact that some events described as suicide attempts are undertaken without the intent to die. I can't imagine why you would object to distinguishing between the two.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 01:56 PM
2

I agree with cries for attention. However, it can't be said that only people who intend to die are mentally ill or that only people who intend to die deserve our empathy. Women who are merely crying for attention are depressed and depression should be taken seriously,. It deserves empathy, and treatment.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 10:39 AM
1

I am offended!
/r/MensRights08/01/13 10:01 AM
1

You should sometimes worry. Like if its your beloved son our wife. Never is always an ugly word.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 09:43 AM
0

Or because men are much more likely to be severely depressed? Or because women are much more likely to get attention and assistance from faking a suicide attempt and this attention and assistance is largly not available to men.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 09:41 AM
3

Your teacher is a dumbass for putting complex issues into a platitude.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 09:38 AM
1

While men should be able to ask for help, in the eyes of most people, it does make you less of a man, and very, very few admire you. To say otherwise I'd to suggest the problem is merely in the imaginations of men. Its not. The punishment is real.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 09:37 AM
10

They are not attention whoring, they are ill and deserve our empathy and assistance.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 09:34 AM
8

Body diamorphia affects equal numbers of males and females. The only difference is how it is expressed. Women have anorexia, and get help. Men use steroids and get prison. And you think it is detrimental to put funds into helping the fifty percent of the people who suffer because they are men? You drank the feminist kool aid. I am disgusted. Only sufferers of body dismorphia who have anorexia or bulimia, and are thus women, deserve treatment. Treating men is "detrimental". Fuck.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 09:32 AM
12

Many male suicide attempts go undetected. How many high speed car accidents are suicides? How many overdoses? How many shootings by police? How many just by neglecting to get healthcare?
/r/MensRights08/01/13 09:23 AM
4

Most female suicide attempts are not suicide attempts. They don't intend to die. That they give the appearance is misleading. Let's consider two categories: suicide attempts, and theatrical performances.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 09:20 AM
5

There are some critical difference. For example, a girl with body dismorphia who uses drugs to lose weight is a victim of an illness and needs help. There is a school nurse to detect the problem and find her a doctor to help her. There are sympathetic movies on Lifetime, and she gets hugs from her friends. A boy with body dismorphia who uses steroids to gain weight Is a criminal and needs to go to jail. There is a campus cop to collect evidence to put him there. There are scandals in the news an…
/r/MensRights08/01/13 08:55 AM
3

The pressure on boys, and men, is to look good in all of those ways, but also the much more intense pressure to look good by performing. Men have to score touchdowns, major in subjects that give the appearance of income potential, display a nice car, pay for their date's concert tickets. Be secure in their jobs, pursue women with a flawless mix of confidence and charm, never making a "creepy" mistake, never showing insecurity, and taking responsibility for supporting a woman's material ambitions…
/r/MensRights08/01/13 08:47 AM
1

I am embarrassed. Not surprised, just embarrassed. There is no evidence that the endocrinological systems of male and female humans are different, and that endocrinology affects behavior?
/r/MensRights07/01/13 03:42 AM
1

Ignoring all other evidence, relying on a poorly understood area of biology, if you arrive at conclusions based on the absence of evidence, on the assumption that none will be forthcoming, then I suppose you are right.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 06:51 AM
1

How have ye established that there is no natural reason?
/r/MensRights06/01/13 02:29 AM
5

Is it possible that parents don't create desires in children by the gifts they give, but merely satisfy desires that are already present?
/r/MensRights05/01/13 07:05 AM
9

In what way are girls socialized away from biology? Or math?
/r/MensRights05/01/13 03:31 AM
13

It matters if you are the one being doxxed or censored. Yes, censorship and justice matter.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 02:22 PM
2

There are a finite number of seats available in universities. In order to have more women, you have to eliminate men who are qualified and interested. If those women were equally or more qualified and interested, they would have the seats now. So it follows that to promote women, it must be done by excluding more qualified and ambitious men. In other words, men have to be punished.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 02:19 PM
2

It may not be a choice for men not to go to college. It might have to do with the fact that they are discriminated against in k-12, they are in prison, they have higher spending obligations and can't forgo earnings to go to school, they are ineligible for hundreds of millions of dollars in female-only scholarships, and so on.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 02:14 PM
1

What gender pay gap?
/r/MensRights29/12/12 02:12 PM
8

"They"? Why not actually do it?
/r/MensRights24/12/12 12:21 PM
41

You have not been reading your feminist propaganda. Because if we punish those that the evidence indicates beyond a reasonable doubt are liars, then actual rape victims will be afraid of reporting real crimes. It's the same reason we never prosecute insurance fraud--because then real victims of actual accidents would be afraid to make insurance claims. Get it?
/r/MensRights24/12/12 12:19 PM
2

Now your filth is directed at me? Where did I claim that "she was in some way asking for it to happen"? You have done nothing here but spew unsubstantiated allegations, and congratulated yourself for it. You are a liar. What do you hope to accomplish by lying?
/r/MensRights02/12/12 07:26 PM
2

The MRM has women like me You are a cancer to equality.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 07:19 PM
2

"Women should avoid dressing like sluts," is not the same as, "women are asking for it." You have completely failed to show one instance of someone saying that women who dress provocatively deserve to be raped. There is not one instance in all of your abundant links. You made the whole thing up. You exaggerated and misled. The proper thing to do is apologize to the people you have defamed, and stop repeating this filthy propaganda.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 07:16 PM
2

Abortion and birth are issues specific to women? That's the most batshit crazy of many batshit crazy things you have said. I never minimized male violence. You minimized it by ignoring it. Over and over.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 05:24 PM
1

In this lecture, he stated, ""women should avoid dressing like sluts in order not to be victimized." What he did not say is, "Women who dress provocatively deserve to be raped, or deserve to be treated less well if they are." He was factually correct, and perfectly rational. It caused outrage because it was taken out of context and used for propaganda purposes. And you swallowed the Kool-Aid. it reflects a wide-held viewpoint by many people in authority who make decisions that control our lives.…
/r/MensRights02/12/12 05:20 PM
2

No that is not true. That statement takes the victim from being a victim and turns them into the reason they were raped. It's like saying it is there fault and it takes blame away from the attacker. It promotes rape, and that is very harmful. Too bad you can't establish that it actually happens. A good amount of the uneducated population thinks a women can "ask for it", and a lot of political figures even endorse that sort of victim blaming mentality. Whom? Prove it. I thought it was only a sile…
/r/MensRights02/12/12 05:17 PM
1

People do say it out loud, just not often. Probably just as often as a women rapes a man.. The question was, "How do we know," and you merely repeated unsubstantiated allegation. Against invisible oppressors. Can't be verified.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 05:13 PM
0

It may be true that people rarely say that out loud, it is more of an internal thought thing. How do you know? "men are rarely raped by women, so it isn't an issue." http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/143skb/2010_cdc_survey_on_sexual_violence_shows_that/ What discrimination do women face in the workplace? The privilege of not being ordered into the most dangerous combat occupations belongs only to women. When men die and women hide in the rear, it is men who are disadvantaged. Men and w…
/r/MensRights02/12/12 05:06 PM
1

Any place that calls themselves a rape crisis center or group, who doesn't take male victims, has no real legitimacy as a therapeutic or serious organization in my mind. Yet it's legal. In fact, it's much worse. Since VAWA, the federal government has spent hundreds of millions of dollars on prevention and services to female victims for which men are ineligible. There are two shelters for male victims in the U.S. Tell me again how bad women have it when it comes to violence.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 05:02 PM
1

What legal issues do women have?
/r/MensRights02/12/12 05:00 PM
1

I never minimized violence against men. Yes, you did. You did so by ignoring men. I said it is a mens rights issue, and men's rights advocates should worry about it the way feminists worry about violence against women. So you really don't favor working together. You think women should act only on behalf of women. You have even went as far as to say that women face no real injustices, The only ones you have asserted are factually inaccurate. You on the other hand have said about women the exact t…
/r/MensRights02/12/12 04:58 PM
1

Given that violence is a much bigger problem for men, when you said that women need to fight violence against women, you were belittling male victims. You did not suggest that women work with men to solve everyone's problem. You took focus away from most victims to direct it only to women.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 04:54 PM
1

Then why did you say women need to fight violence against women in your list of disadvantages that women face, instead of saying everyone needs to fight against violence. Ignoring and dismissing men is easy, right?
/r/MensRights02/12/12 04:52 PM
1

Women need to fight violence against women Men are about nine times more likely to be the victims of violent crime, get less protection and less justice, and you think this is a disadvantage to women? In what way are women disadvantaged by discrimination in the workplace? Women have more control over their bodies than men have over theirs. Where is the discrimination? Saying one group has more strife then the other is factually not correct imo. This is a factual question that is rather well sett…
/r/MensRights02/12/12 04:51 PM
1

Add: Women are less likely to be hired for manual labor and engineering jobs because they are less likely to seek them in spite of having abundant advantages. Engineering firms and trade unions aggressively recruit women, offer them affirmative actions, and pay them more than men. That women don't accept is not a form of discrimination against them. In fact, it is a symptom of the advantage that women have ecomically: they are not burdened with having to do the highest paying jobs because they c…
/r/MensRights02/12/12 04:47 PM
1

I live as a women and I find myself subject to gender bias, sexual stereotypes, and harassment, Unless you can show you are subject to more rigid stereotypes or more harassment than men, you can't substantiate a claim of disadvantage. A man offering to do manual labor for you is not harming you, he is serving and protecting you because he perceives that you are more valuable than he is. You have said that women face discrimination, but after all the calls for evidence, you haven't provided any. …
/r/MensRights02/12/12 04:44 PM
1

I find it delusional to deny that women in other places around the globe experience serious discrimination . Upon examining the evidence, it may not be as delusional as you think.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 04:39 PM
1

the middle of the road types; the ones who are educated on the issues and interested in human justice, are pretty much on the same page. Who are these? Where is this substantial number of women, those who identify as feminists and those who do not, who are demanding equality in the selective service, who are demanding equal parenting, who demand and end to affirmative action and female only scholarships, who demand a Violence Against Men Act? Where have you seen a substantial number of people, m…
/r/MensRights02/12/12 04:37 PM
1

This fairly accurately describes the U.S. as well.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 04:30 PM
0

Do you have some evidence that women are less likely to be hired for manual labor and engineering jobs. In engineering, data shows that firms go to great lengths to recruit women, afford them the benefits of affirmative action, and pay them more than men for the same work. The same is true of trade unions. To demonstrate an inequity, you would have to show that males in the porn industry are not regarded as bad parents. Can you do that? If you can't, it's not a gender issue. You are disadvantage…
/r/MensRights02/12/12 08:43 AM
6

In fact, they are. Taxes and insurance policies, paid mostly by men, support birth control programs for which men are not eligible. Here is an example: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/vpw1c/why_tomorrow_is_a_big_day_for_the_mrm/ But my question remains, and it is a serious one: in what ways are women discriminated against by men in the U.S. today?
/r/MensRights01/12/12 03:35 PM
8

In what ways are women discriminated against in the united states today?
/r/MensRights01/12/12 02:33 PM
2

If we prosecute people for lying, it discourages others from truthfully making similar statements. That's why we don't prosecute people for filing false insurance claims--it might discourage people with legitimate losses from collecting on life insurance or fire insurance. Or something like that.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 05:23 PM
3

Lawyer first. Lawyer first. Lawyer first. Lawyer first. Lawyer first. Lawyer first. Lawyer first. Lawyer first. Lawyer first. Lawyer first. Lawyer first. Lawyer first. Lawyer first. Lawyer first. Lawyer first.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 11:21 AM
2

Invite people to /r/mensrights. Ask people to sign up for the free e-mail newsletter from fathersandfamilies.org. Go to amazon or half.com and buy all of the second-hand copies of books by Dr. Warren Farrell and Dr. Christina Hoff Sommers. You'll get them for 2 or three bucks. Pass them around, and ask the people you give them to to pass them on when they are done. Ask questions about how people feel. You don't arouse opposition that way. For example, if you are watching Seinfeld and you see Ela…
/r/MensRights21/11/12 05:42 PM
5

Now infect others with your attitude. Let's give Jethro some ideas about how to do that.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 12:26 PM
1

This could easily get you fired from your job, or expelled from school or university. You have created a hostile and intimidating environment. All a woman has to do is say the two males were staring at her, following her, making gestures, affirmatively doing any act. If the human resources staff, or the student committee believes the teary-eyed woman making the complain, you lose.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 03:49 AM
0

It gets worse. This study quantifies the disparities that arise after arrest. Women are overwhelmingly less likely to be the subjects of reports to police, and when they are they are overwhelmingly less likely to be investigated. Woman calls her mother and tearfully reports that her husband hit her. "Get out of the house, I am calling the police!" Man calls his mother and tearfully reports that his wife hit him. "You need to calm down. Every marriage has ups and downs. You can work this out tomo…
/r/MensRights18/11/12 06:58 AM
1

Spousal abuse is a legal defense available only to women, in the Homolka case, and countless others. If you tell the prosecutor or jury that a man made you do it, you are not responsible for your actions. But this should remind you not only of Homolka, it should remind you of how prosecutors and juries, and even defendants view gender every day. Man and woman in a car. Traffic stop. Drugs found. Man goes to prison, woman didn't even know about the drugs, charges dropped. Two men in a car. Traffi…
/r/MensRights18/11/12 05:20 AM
-2

What you figured was, " The one who has been doing this shit for two years or the one who has been doing it for twenty and has connections to many other murders/disappearances?" You figured this because Hendy told you, and you believed her. And Hendy's assertions were the best argument you could come up with to defend the preferential treatment that women get from the government. You could have said, "It is true that women get preferential treatment, and it is a gross injustice." But you went wi…
/r/MensRights17/11/12 06:43 PM
-1

The one who has been doing this shit for two years or the one who has been doing it for twenty and has connections to many other murders/disappearances? You drank the Hendy Kool-Aid. FBI: Miss Hendy, Ray did it all, and you were just a secondary helper, right? Hendy: That's right. FBI: Ray did a lot of other stuff which can be established only through your testimony, right" Hendy: That's right. Girl_Giant: See, Ray had "connections" for 20 years, and Hendy was just a girl that provided secondary…
/r/MensRights17/11/12 06:07 PM
0

So what kind of plea deal would you have offered Ray to provide evidence against Hendy? Oh yea, you wouldn't because it would make no sense. Why does it make more sense the other way around?
/r/MensRights17/11/12 05:28 PM
2

I don't object to plea bargains. I object to women getting preferential treatment from the government. In light of this undeniable fact, why would you remove the genders? Gender is the point. In Alabama between 1930 and 1949, if no white defendant was ever charged with murdering a black person, would you say, "remove the issue of race"?
/r/MensRights17/11/12 04:56 PM
-1

Ray's daughter, an accomplice, got 9 years. Four years plus probation. You don't see inequity in offering plea bargains to women that are not available to men? You don't see an inequity in charging this man with kidnapping and this woman with being a secondary contributor? If that's true, your inequity detector needs calibration. I wonder why you refererred to the man as "Mr. "Oh hai I built an RV torture chamber and murdered 60 people," yet the woman merely as "his partner"? Maybe you embody th…
/r/MensRights17/11/12 04:53 PM
4

Maybe you can see a man kidnapping, torturing, raping, and murdering multiple women and getting probation? Can you show me some examples? It is a light sentence ONLY for the women. The man got 224 years.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 02:12 PM
2

The pattern overwhelmingly suggests that when there are two defendants, a man and a woman, the woman will be offered a plea bargain that is not available to the man. In this case, like many, many others, we have every reason to believe that the woman was as culpable as the man in every way. Why didn't the government offer to reduce the charges against the man in exchange for giving evidence against the woman? The woman got the offer because she is a woman. This is a direct link, and it is so rou…
/r/MensRights17/11/12 02:10 PM
1

The pattern overwhelmingly suggests that when there are two defendants, a man and a woman, the woman will be offered a plea bargain that is not available to the man. In this case, like many, many others, we have every reason to believe that the woman was as culpable as the man in every way. Why didn't the government offer to reduce the charges against the man in exchange for giving evidence against the woman? The woman got the offer because she is a woman. This is a direct link, and it is so rou…
/r/MensRights17/11/12 02:09 PM
1

What's your point?
/r/MensRights17/11/12 12:06 PM
2

Is there anyone on Reddit more hated than demmian? Google "Reddit+demmian" and see demmian's history of bigotry and hatefulness.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 09:43 AM
6

Post your essay here so we can determine if there are any weaknesses in your case. That will help you anticipate and prepare for criticisms you might get. In any case, it's your turn to step up and be a man. I want you to fight this bigotry regardless of the consequences. If you are not willing to submit to a suspension, you are a pussy. I want you to give copies of your essay, along with a factual description of the conversation you had with the teacher to everyfuckingbody (administrators, scho…
/r/MensRights10/11/12 04:28 AM
0

That was the worst advice I have ever heard.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 03:46 AM
0

I was similarly situated, and luckily kept everything. Even after the state has told you they expunged everything, if the records have been forwarded to the Feds, the Feds are not subject to the state judge's order to destroy the records. This matter might show up in a future criminal background check for employment (even though you were not convicted), as it did for me, might prevent you from re-entering the U.S. after you leave for a vacation, as it did for me, might prevent you from entering …
/r/MensRights07/11/12 09:52 PM
0

It is good citizenship to learn about and act on information that indicates serious problems in the justice system. What is your legal theory for the trouble one could get in for telling the truth? How would his truthful statements be used against him? Even if this is true, and I see no reason to believe that it is, it should be the right of a person to weigh the costs and benefits of making such a disclosure. You are poorly positioned to know if an author would be harmed more by disclosure or s…
/r/MensRights07/11/12 09:47 PM
0

I am seriously asking why a person who voluntarily put her story in the public record, and a person who voluntarily retells it here can't do so. To describe this as doxxing is an overbroad use of the term. That doxxing is sometimes harmful does not indicate that it is in this case. That should be easily apparent.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 09:07 PM
0

They are not gone if you retain copies. Make sure you get copies, using your state's FOI laws if necessary, of everything before the shredding begins. You will need them in the future, and I think you should post them here.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 09:06 PM
1

How do you know Reddit has higher vigilante tendencies? Why do you assume these actions would be harmful? In the case of an injustice, it is good citizenship to take action. Why would you prevent good citizenship? What harm arises from preventing people from voluntarily disclosing material facts? This would encourage people to lie, embellish, exaggerate, all harmful to the community. It can only help if we can verify the truth of statements. Disallowing people from telling their own stories puts…
/r/MensRights07/11/12 09:05 PM
2

Why is that a problem? CNN.com does not seem to have a problem publishing the names of criminal complainants on the web. Why should Reddit? It's all in the public record, anyway.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 07:26 PM
3

maybe you should re-submit it without the names. Why?
/r/MensRights07/11/12 07:14 PM
5

So if they are equally deadly, then the government funds research, prevention, detection, and treatment at equal rates, right?
/r/MensRights07/11/12 06:57 PM
0

If the child is not OP's, then paternity really, really fucking matters. I would think an employee of DCF would not discourage parents from knowing their own children and children from knowing their parents. The consequence of an error or a fraud is often that a biological father is denied access to his child and a child is denied access to his or her biological father for life. Additionally, men are duped into paying decades of mommy support for children that aren't theirs. Is encouraging this …
/r/MensRights31/10/12 06:31 PM
0

In what state do biological fathers not have child support obligations merely because they are not married?
/r/MensRights31/10/12 06:05 PM
0

Get a lawyer. Get a paternity test. Get a recording device.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 03:35 PM
4

You need to record everything, preferably with video. In a parking lot there are no wires, thus it is not wiretapping. Make back-up copies of all your recording in another physical space. That goes for SMSs, also. Don't worry about consent. Even if you can't use them in court, you want them. And there are a lot of circumstances under which recordings can save your ass, while not exposing you to prosecution. Scenarios like this: to make sure you don't get custody, she accuses you of battery. You …
/r/MensRights31/10/12 03:34 PM
0

The largest part of which is, "She was asking for it." That's what feminists obviously think, "If a man is provocative with his body, he deseves to be assaulted
/r/MensRights27/10/12 07:36 AM
1

I would prefer if everyone was free to do something as innocuous as show their entire skin surface without being assaulted, or even arousing anger. There is enough legitimate anger in the world, we don't need to invent more of it for stupid shit.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 05:55 AM
2

You don't blame them for being angry at a man for exposing his body. You okay if I am similarly angry at women who march topless in slutwalks? Does it make sense?
/r/MensRights27/10/12 05:29 AM
2

Consider this: I am a woman. I disagree that women should be raped for exposing themselves. But there is a wrong way to go about disagreeing, so women who march topless in slutwalks should be assaulted because flashing your body is the wrong way if you are above 12.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 05:23 AM
0

You win the human decency prize.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 05:21 AM
1

If you want people to stop being assaulted, stop assaulting them. He was taunting them in exactly the same way that women are taunting men when they march topless in slut walks.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 05:19 AM
0

The slutwalkers are not a "rally for victims of rape". That's exactly what it is. The message is that women don't deserve to be assaulted for exposing themselves. And the message on this occasion is that men do.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 05:18 AM
3

Assault is not funny. I would not laugh.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 05:10 AM
2

somebdy yelling at him and blasting him with an air horn. That's assault. Fuck him for what?
/r/MensRights26/10/12 08:47 PM
1

Provide link for what? Your study does not show hiring practices and starting salary any more than a chess game shows the real results of war. Most people like hard data. See if you can find some.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 03:24 AM
1

Actually, I'd say both are disadvantaged in different ways That's another way of saying the genders are equal, which is a very different message than the one you started with.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 03:19 AM
1

If women earn less, it's because they are disadvantaged. If they earn more, it's because they are disadvantaged.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 03:51 PM
0

It might be fair to say that women choose to earn less money for themselves and their families than men. Why are women neglecting their responsibilities as providers?
/r/MensRights18/10/12 03:50 PM
1

ere are some reasons this study should be taken as propaganda, or at best entertainment that publicizes a website, rather than scholarship: The respondents were not randomly selected. The data is self-reported. The number of respondents is not revealed. The conclusions are contradicted by large, randomized studies. They report only a comparison of medians, which is misleading, or at best useless. They do not control for hours worked (we know that women work 25% fewer hours than men), equity inve…
/r/MensRights18/10/12 03:48 PM
1

He was talking about giving hiring preference to women yet nobody has claimed discrimination.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 03:33 PM
1

Where did you check that?
/r/MensRights18/10/12 03:32 PM
1

Why not link to games that show men being discriminated against in childcare jobs? Why not point out that women are the beneficiaries of discrimination in fire fighting jobs and SBA loans? Why not discuss the fact that trade unions are so desperate for women that poorly qualified females take slots in apprenticeships that could go to more qualified men. When your spotlight is so narrow, what you reveal is misleading because of what you conceal. If it is true that men are preferred in some jobs a…
/r/MensRights18/10/12 03:30 PM
1

Your linked article does NOT even hint that women get paid less. It reports the results of a game. Games can not be presumed to reflect the actual facts in the real world. I am bothered by this because in the absence of real data that shows real discrimination, feminists often attempt to mislead us into believing that the workplace is rigged because imaginary data collected while playing a game suggests that it could be. Starting salaries for female engineers are higher than those of men. Americ…
/r/MensRights18/10/12 03:23 PM
0

At what lower end jobs do women get paid less? Do female fruit pickers get less per pound? Do female gas station attendants get paid less? Do female truck drivers get paid less? Do female soldiers get paid less?
/r/MensRights18/10/12 03:16 PM
2

www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/yfsyc/a_list_of_common_anti_male_shaming_tactics/
/r/MensRights18/10/12 03:14 PM
1

And if you repeat the lies often enough for long enough, even a brilliant lawyer like Barack Obama will take them to be true without questioning them.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 03:13 PM
1

Current Population Survey shows that women earn, on average, 77 percent of what men earn. But they work 25% few hours. Moreover, as an economist, I am sure you are interested in total compensation, not just salaries and wages. If a man and a woman each work 30 years and qualify for a pension, and the woman collects benefits for 7 more years based on her life expectancy, her total compensation is much higher than the man's. If she also collects Social Security benefits based on her earnings for s…
/r/MensRights18/10/12 03:10 PM
1

That there is a law preventing wage disparity is not evidence of wage disparity. If the averagewoman were paid less, meaning all of them get 28% less, or half get 56% less, there would be millions of lawsuits. Why aren't there? Because there is no substantial number of women being paid less. Show me a body of female airline pilots that get less than a men of the same qualifications doing the same work. Show me a meaningful number of female school teachers or UAW factory workers who get paid less…
/r/MensRights18/10/12 01:33 PM
1

I'm glad that you won't assert that rape is not wrong, or that I don't know rape is wrong.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 02:12 AM
1

I do not use rape as proof that an opinion is valid. I use rape to illustrate that direct experience is not a prerequisite to an opinion. Instead look to the criteria which make up a truly justified opinion. It has nothing to do with whether you've tried the thing in question. I have said that at least three times.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 02:05 AM
2

People who disapprove of porn know what it is, and know as much about it as I know about rape. In both cases, it is not necessary to have direct experience in order to form or express an opinion. That's the point. That one person has an opinion on rape does not depend on whether or not anyone else has an opinion, or what it is. Likewise, that one person disapproves of porn does not depend on whether or not it is an edge case. When someone has an opinion on porn that differs from mine, I would pr…
/r/MensRights09/10/12 01:03 AM
1

Yet in both cases, it is not necessary to have direct experience in order to form or express an opinion. That's the point. That one person has an opinion on rape does not depend on whether or not anyone else has an opinion, or what it is. Likewise, that one person disapproves of porn does not depend on whether or not it is an edge case. When someone has an opinion on porn that differs from mine, I would prefer to ignore them, or to make my case based on reason rather than telling them to shut up…
/r/MensRights09/10/12 01:02 AM
2

[email protected] Virtually none of it is.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 12:23 PM
5

I've never raped anyone, but I know it's wrong.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 11:58 AM
-1

I don't see why a feminist forum should have to repeatedly justify feminism. Because that's the point. You think feminists should not be obliged to justify their factual assertions, ideals, and actions? To whom else do you give such a free ride? However, my comment does not demand that anyone justify feminism.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 02:26 AM
5

Do you think this is obvious trolling? **MY RESPONSE: If men and women are not treated equally under the law, and feminists want to achieve equality, nobody is working harder than feminists to remedy this situation, right? Even if they don't really care about equality, for sure they care about children, right?**
/r/MensRights06/10/12 02:10 PM
1

I don't know what SRS is.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 02:08 PM
13

I did not disagree with anything. I presumed feminists are on the side of parents who are treated inequitably, and if they are not, I presumed they are concerned about children. I just noticed I have been banned from subreddits I have never even heard of, "AskFeminists" and "MetaFeminism". demmian is a busy little beaver.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 06:46 AM
1

The comment is silencing toward people that don't meet the measure of success, and that if you are successful in business, you are exempt from silencing. Privilege for the winners of a game we should not be playing. This is a place where toxic attitudes toward men should not be discussed, or this is a place where anything men say should be above criticism?
/r/MensRights06/10/12 03:46 AM
1

Defining success as making a profit puts everyone who does not make a vaguely defined amount of money in the "unsuccessful" category. It creates a class of losers that don't deserve to be regarded that way. And we are not very good at saying that financial success is "one component of success." We overemphasize income with respect to men to the extent that it harms everyone. The comment that started this did not say, "If you are some admirable combination of rational, intelligent, integrable, em…
/r/MensRights06/10/12 03:39 AM
1

You did not congratulate him on his business, you questioned his concern for "what the haters say." I understand you think people with money should have the privilege of going their own way. This implies people without money should not.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 03:17 AM
12

Why do you think success defines a man? You know how toxic that attitude is? About as toxic as telling women they are defined by their sexual attractiveness. But in 2012, we call bullshit when women are forced into this role. Let's call bullshit when someone says boys have to score touchdowns to get praise, applause, and pussy. Let's call bullshit when we tell men that those who score the best jobs are better than those who don't, and that if he is not successful, he is not appealing to women. L…
/r/MensRights05/10/12 01:58 PM
7

I don't think anyone actually says, "It's the way they dress." I think this is a fiction used by feminists to demonize men because they like to be "victims".
/r/MensRights03/10/12 05:19 AM
2

If it is such a concern of yours, I look forward to your creation of the first artificial womb. Till then, maybe try finding a stable partner that you can truly trust to carry your child rather than hoping a random hook up will provide young. How about just stop perpetuating the myth that women's rights is about equality and acknowledge that women's rights is about elevating the position of women at the expense of men? You think a surrogate would be awarded damages in a lawsuit for refusing to h…
/r/MensRights02/10/12 04:13 PM
4

You do not remember correctly. Presently in the U.S., women are paid substantially more than men for equal work. As I have pointed out, this is shown clearly by the CPS. They are 50% more likely to earn college degrees (correlated with white collar work), and have a considerably lower unemployment rate. This does not sound like they are victims of discrimination. I am not aware of men who think sexual harassment is harmless. You have not established that there are a meaningful number of them, or…
/r/MensRights02/10/12 04:04 PM
1

Given that her purpose for coming here was to collect accolades and to be congratulated on her superiority, I am guessing no.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 03:52 PM
0

You think if the surrogate wants an abortion, a man has a right to prevent it? You think if the man wants the surrogate to abort, he can cause her to do so?
/r/MensRights02/10/12 10:09 AM
1

You do not advocate equality with respect to abortion rights. You want women to have rights to terminate a pregnancy. You don't want men to have the right to abort their fetuses. Likewise you want women to have the choice to a continue a pregnancy to birth. You don't want men to have that right. You want to give women unilateral power over men fetuses, and deny men all rights to become parents. You want me to be second-class. By pointing out that in spite of the lip-service you pay to equality t…
/r/MensRights02/10/12 03:54 AM
-2

You still didn't answer the question. It is undeniable that men are disadvantaged with respect to contraceptives. You ignored that, instead seeking to preserve the law that discriminates against men from being repealed by Republicans, which you couched as an attack on women. I can show you not only once in five years, but several times today where you have made similar statements. Here they are: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/10rle9/i_would_like_to_introduce_womens_rights_a/ I have …
/r/MensRights01/10/12 09:06 PM
0

I don't think that a man ought to be dragged into having to financially support a child that he didn't want to have. It is not just a financially obligation, you said that men should be able to abort their fetuses. This would mean no baby for mom as well. You have warned your sons about treachery while supporting the law that denies them the same benefits that women get. I don't care what other people say about you. I am taking my position based on your own statements. You claim to be a supporte…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 08:56 PM
-1

The first of dozens of places you said it was, " a woman's right to contraception or decent treatment in the work place...is why I choose to introduce this in /r/MensRights instead of 2X. Women have the right to contraceptives. Men don't. You came to MensRights to say that you want to preserve this right for women. You make no mention of securing it for men. This leaves no possibility but inequality. You publicize a Women's Rights subreddit for the same reason: Inequality is your agenda.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 08:38 PM
2

I believe that any future male contraception should be paid for by government. Again ignoring the fact that conception control is presently available for men, but only women get benefits under the law. Men are second class citizens, and your remedy is to say that women are under attack by those who want equality instead of saying the issue is to secure rights for men. Or is securing rights for men the topic of the Women's Rights subreddit?
/r/MensRights01/10/12 08:32 PM
8

You just generated a wall of text to try and rationalize why I should pay for women's birth control. That's how "equality" works. And in doing so, she suppresses the fact that men are not recipients of birth control under the same law. The law specifically excludes the male pill. That is to say when it becomes available, it is already excluded. The law would have to be ammended by Congress and signed by the president to include the male pill, and that would be opposed by women's rights advocates…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 08:30 PM
0

I will probably get to enjoy another witch hunt because of it, Another victim narrative?
/r/MensRights01/10/12 08:22 PM
2

Abortion is a parenting ssue that affects all parents equally. It is not a women's issue. Presently in the U.S. the wage gap favors women. This is well-established by the Current Population Survey.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 08:22 PM
-1

I don't detect that you want to talk about inequalities. I think you have been very clear that you want to focus on improving the status of women in areas where men are already second-class citizens, like healthcare, family planning, parenting, and employment. In spite of the fact that I have asked over and over, you have not established that any disadvantages for women exist. What will you be discussing in your Women's RIghts subreddit? Discrimination against men in healthcare, contraception, p…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 08:18 PM
-1

Women are paid more for equal work. In order to achieve equality, they would have to be paid less, or men more, or both. You are trying to turn your forum into something productive for men by ignoring the fact that women currently get healthcare benefits that men don't and calling that a disadvantage for women? How does that help men or achieve equality?
/r/MensRights01/10/12 08:13 PM
0

"In what ways are women treated less well than men under the law? Outside the law, what rights do men have that women don't?" I want to keep the gender rift going? By "gender rift", do you mean the march toward equality? Yes, I want to keep that going, in opposition to your distractions and disinformation. You came here to promote inequality. If there is a rift, that is the source. Who said I think it is in the interest of men to hate women? This follows the party line. If you can't sustain your…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 08:10 PM
-1

I don't think women are less smart. The evidence suggests they are not. I am not aware that Akin claimed women are less smart. If he did, it was not part of your remarks. You criticized him for making a factually accurate statement. In doing so, you cast a halo of sexism over him. It was a false allegation. I am thrilled to know that when a woman is pregnant, the father should have the right to order an abortion of the fetus carried by his partner. I am aware of no other woman who takes this pos…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 08:01 PM
-2

Right, men and women are equal in Catholic hospitals, and you want to ignore men and focus on achieving rights for women, creating inequality. You try to convince people of what you think is right, which is more disadvantages for men. Sadly, yours is an overwhelmingly popular opinion.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 07:38 PM
1

You think there are men similarly situated, and in the interest of equality you ignore them and exclude them?
/r/MensRights01/10/12 07:37 PM
4

So you have described a disadvantage for men under the law, and you want to promote a website that ignores this. Because you want equality. You don't seem to think that the ability of men to prevent or stop a pregnancy is important. Because equality. You think it benefits you for men to have fewer reproductive rights so you don't have to pay taxes to support children. Because equality. That's how it benefits you to ignore the lesser rights of men. OR, you think men should have the right to choos…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 07:36 PM
1

Seems like they purpose would be identified before the subreddit is created.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 07:23 PM
-1

So women presently have access to birth control and abortions, men do not, and you think women are disadvantaged? Your reaction is to advocate for women and ignore men to achieve equality? And you DO NOT think men should have a right to abortion. But women are disadvantaged and need a special subreddit to maintain or increase...
/r/MensRights01/10/12 07:21 PM
0

Have you examined ways in which Akin has disadvanged men? What level of treatment did women receive in the middle ages? In what way could Akin accumulate the power to restore this? Palin pushes a platform of xenophobia, hatred, and classism that uniquely affects women? Corporations were not given personhood under Bush. It was a Supreme Court ruling in 1819. How does the GOP want to take personhood away from women?
/r/MensRights01/10/12 07:19 PM
-2

You didn't answer the question.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 07:15 PM
-4

You didn't choose to participate in a subreddit that seeks to extend advantages for women and ignore disadvantages for men, it was HANDED OFF TO YOU.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 07:14 PM
0

That you have a subreddit that our ignores men is not your fault or responsibility, you were ROPED INTO IT. You don't even like it, it's just that you don't have a choice! You TRIED to remove yourself, but a man wouldn't let you! You want to be fair to men while focusing contraceptive for women only, ignoring the fact that men have less access to contraceptives? Because a man roped you into it. You support equal pay? What will your subreddit advocate to achieve higher incomes for men and lower i…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 07:13 PM
1

If access to family members is both a male and female issue, why would you give your subreddit a name that excudes men, and focus only on half of the victims, ignoring half? What cultural structure in the legal system disadvantages women with respect to custody?
/r/MensRights01/10/12 07:09 PM
1

If you are in agreement, then where are the disadvantages for women that need to be addressed by your new subreddit?
/r/MensRights01/10/12 07:07 PM
-2

What women's rights problems exist in other countries that are not shared by men, or have a male equivalent? In families where both the man and the woman have income, who do you think contributes more money to the family? Whom do you think benefits more from the combined income? In families where only one works, whom do you think is more likely to earn? And who gets the greatest share of the benefits? In your quest for equality, how do you propose to get women to meet their obligation to earn mo…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 07:05 PM
-2

Women actually have smaller brains. That is factually accurate. 1130 cc's for women, 1260 for men. In what way did Akin's boneheaded remark abut rape limit the rights of women? Do you think men should have the right to abort their fetuses for any reason?
/r/MensRights01/10/12 07:01 PM
3

Do you think in this economic climate men don't take what jobs they can get? Are there a lot of men involved with churches that don't believe the doctrine, because it is a clique?
/r/MensRights01/10/12 06:57 PM
2

Does the Catholic hospital do vasectomies under similar circumstances? If not, how are women disadvantaged relative to men? You will get an abortion? As an advocate of equality, what are you doing to establish the right of men to end gestation of their fetuses?
/r/MensRights01/10/12 06:56 PM
6

Let me ask you this? Do you think it benefits you to support women women who want to prevent unwanted pregnancies and ignore men who want to prevent unwanted pregnancies? Women are not paying for their health insurance. All members of the pool are paying. You care about retaining benefits for women. You do not seem to care about achieving those benefits for men. You want to preserve women's superior status, not bring about equality. In Texas, was Planned Parenthood funding cut only for women's s…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 06:54 PM
1

If a child has two parents, one male and one female, limiting access to abortions is more restrictive for women? Do men have a right to abort their fetuses? Or to prevent an abortion? Do men who are employed by churches have access to insurance paid contraception?
/r/MensRights01/10/12 06:46 PM
1

You think the governmernt has greater limits on birth control for women than for men? Do you find that politicians are more likely to talk as though women are family pets as they are to talk as if men are family pets? What effect has Akin had on the rights of women? What effects on the rights of men?
/r/MensRights01/10/12 06:44 PM
-5

In what ways are women treated less well than men under the law? Outside the law, what rights do men have that women don't? Particularly, you mentioned contraception. What advantages do men have over men in family planning and parenting? What rights do men have that women do not have? I wonder what about family planning and parenting to be uniquely female. In what ways are women not treated decently in the workplace that men don't share, or have an equivalent form of mistreatment? In what ways d…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 06:41 PM
1

The combined studies are nationally representative. Your foreign study is not. You aren't going to hand anyone's ass to anyone by citing a study that does not attempt to determine if rape allegations are false to prove that rape allegations are not false.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 05:52 PM
0

You're loopy! First, you had to go all the way to the U.K. to find a study, then you neglected to read it. You linked to an abstract. Moreover, the Home Office did not investigate any of the cases to determine whether or not they were false, so the study does not even attempt to answer the question you claim it answers. Idiot.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 05:31 PM
1

Neither of those are nationally representative, they are too small to be a considered representative of all accusations, Combined, the studies examine thousands of cases reported to large and small police departments around the country. They constitute a very good sample. The best nationally representative data sets we have put it at about 10% confirmed. You mean the one you just made up and can't be verified? If you would like to cite a study that shows less than 30%, I'll read it.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 05:13 PM
7

McDowell, C. P. (1985). False allegations. Forensic Science Digest, 11(4), 56-76. Kanin, False rape allegations," Archives of Sexual Behavior, Feb 1994 v23 n1 p81(12) Et al. No study has ever arrived at a rate of false allegations less than 30%. I just looked at your post history and think you called 13 people liars in the last 24 hours. What a crackpot!
/r/MensRights01/10/12 04:50 PM
3

Just because you regret consenting to sex doesn't mean you get to falsely accuse him of rape. 30-60% of rape allegations are affirmatively proven false. False allegations are the female way to rape a man. Don't be THAT woman .
/r/MensRights01/10/12 02:58 PM
2

You mean when adult men kiss 12 year old girls who are unknown to them it is NOT "cute, funny, and magical?" I find it impossible to believe that if Young Jeezy kissed a 12 year old girl that anyone would object. http://www.webeengone.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/jeezy_snowman_575.jpg
/r/MensRights26/09/12 02:20 PM
2

She was not speaking for all women. She was talking about insane women.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 06:21 AM
3

She was not speaking for all women. She was talking about insane women.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 06:21 AM
1

Your study does not report on the number of rapes. It reports on the number of adjudicated rapes. You imbecile.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 05:10 AM
1

That was a very histrionic tantrum! Labut needs a nap. Yet another reason you are a dipshit is: Idiot: "a fellow inmate even said 'nice ass' etc." BJS: "unexplained rectal bleeding; rectal or anal tears or fissures; bruises, scratches, or abrasions on buttocks; genital bruising; or nipple injuries"
/r/MensRights04/09/12 04:42 AM
1

I gave you three studies. That you say this is not "factually backed up" shows you to be a wingnut. That you can come up with no contradictory evidence aside from the disavowed 2003 data borders on delusional.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 07:56 PM
1

I already did. You ignored it because you are a snivelling ninny.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 06:48 AM
1

You are still using old data, which, as I have pointed out, the DOJ has specifically said is grossly inaccurate because it relies on reports by prison officials rather than independent study, you buffoon. The absurdity of the numbers you possess is exactly why Congress demanded further inquiry, the results of which are profoundly different.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 06:09 AM
1

I believe in what's factual, not simply unsubstantiated claims. That's why BJS cross-pollinates the data with other scholarship. 'Victims' in prison often get special treatment as well. Inmates that report crimes often get special treatment of another kind. asked a bunch of people and did not base the number on FACTUAL evidence. Like the clinical evidence and adjudications that you continue to ignore? There is also a high rate of mental illness in prisons. Some of it caused by sexual assault. ra…
/r/MensRights02/09/12 08:09 PM
1

You don't consider the Bureau of Justice statistics and their 108,000 interviews, along with studies of clinical and judicial records to be factual verification. Interesting. Wacky, but interesting. You think "asking around" and interviews with a randomly selected sample of 10% of the population, and corroboration by ex-inmates and clinical and judicial records are the same thing. Interesting. Loony, but interesting. You think the definition in these studies includes "teasing". I don't recall th…
/r/MensRights02/09/12 01:18 PM
1

The DOJ has publically acknowledeged that the data collected before 2008 was grossly inaccurate. That data was not the result of independent study, but relied on reports from prison officials. They have since undertake independent study and the conclusions have been modified. Finding old data on Wikipedia does nothing to refute the BJS data. Moreover, you confuse two populations. The BJS studied those currently incarcerated, not those on probation or parole. Parolees were used to corroborate the…
/r/MensRights02/09/12 10:54 AM
0

Is that how the scientists at the Bureau of Justice Statistics work? They just "ask around", then publish ridiculous and unsubstantiated claims? I suppose that would leave a lot of afternoons free for golf. The number of sexual assaults in prison is not more than the number of rape victims. You understand the number of rapes can't be more than the number of rapes, right? If you don't, the Bureau of Justice Statistics does. It means there are more sexual assaults in prisons than outside of prison…
/r/MensRights02/09/12 07:28 AM
2

I know our jail had a very, very low rate of rape. That's what every single staff member interviewed by the DOJ said. Turns out there are 216,000 rape victims every year in prisons and jails. So maybe you were not well-positioned to know if rape was common or rare.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 09:07 PM
1

Rape prevention would not cost anything. By this estimate, it would save 50 billion per year. http://www.google.co.th/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&ved=0CDAQFjAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.huffingtonpost.com%2F2012%2F06%2F15%2Feliminating-prison-rape-w_n_1600279.html&ei=I3hCUM33Ms6zrAf53oHQCA&usg=AFQjCNFFNVNn3P_tJD1eIranHEAnf18UEg&sig2=5eZJYKMFWLnvw0HjhGlB2g
/r/MensRights01/09/12 09:04 PM
2

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/cpquery/?&dbname=cp112&sid=cp112hl6f5&refer=&r_n=hr169.112&item=&&&sel=TOC_103006& Here is the congressional committee saying that PREA and the 216,000 rape victims per year are not being taken seriously: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/cpquery/?&dbname=cp112&sid=cp112hl6f5&refer=&r_n=hr169.112&item=&&&sel=TOC_103006&
/r/MensRights01/09/12 09:03 PM
1

216,000 victims per year is not common? If that were true, along with your story about marking yourself to be killed, unless there are some very prolific rapists, why don't we have 216,000 murders in prison? http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/cpquery/?&dbname=cp112&sid=cp112hl6f5&refer=&r_n=hr169.112&item=&&&sel=TOC_103006&
/r/MensRights01/09/12 09:01 PM
1

Guards can be bought/extorted and cameras unplugged. Bullshit. If that were true, there would be 216,000 escapes per year instead of 216,000 rape victims. The risk of corrupt guards and unplugged cameras is only present if we choose to allow it. If we choose not to allow it, the problem can be solved, like the problem of perimeter security. According to the statistics, prison rape (both male and female) is substantiated at a 2% prevalence rate, According to what statistics? There was a former in…
/r/MensRights01/09/12 08:59 PM
2

Those inmates are wrong. http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/cpquery/?&dbname=cp112&sid=cp112hl6f5&refer=&r_n=hr169.112&item=&&&sel=TOC_103006&
/r/MensRights01/09/12 08:53 PM
1

Basically, american culture seems to think it's not a big deal and treats it lightly and jokes about it, which is quite a horrible outlook. Only if the victim is male.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 08:46 PM
1

When the victims are men.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 08:45 PM
1

There are some powerful disincentives for victims to push the button.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 08:45 PM
2

DOJ concludes 216,000 inmates are raped each year. Not 216,000 rapes, 216,000 victims.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 08:44 PM
5

What does it cost to allow 216,000 inmates to be raped every year? What do we spend to prevent rapes outside prisons? If your sister at college were at the obscene risk that men in prison face, would you be willing to pay for prevention, even if it were as expensive as a video camera?
/r/MensRights01/09/12 08:41 PM
3

some people believe they have done something bad so deserve everything they get Like grow some pot?
/r/MensRights01/09/12 07:40 PM
0

How about a look at the publication record of Kristin Schilt, the person who brought the term "cisgender" (and it's derivatives) into the lexicon: Persistence of Gender Inequality Gender Trouble Gender...in the Workplace Girls and 'Zine Making Radical Feminism by the New Angry Women in Rock Strong Riot Women: Feminist Subculture Participation Roit Grrls, Ladyfests, and the Grrl 'Zine Network Queens of the Damned: Women and Girls Is She Man Enough: Feminine Masculinity Whiteness in Riot Grrl 'Zin…
/r/MensRights31/08/12 01:51 AM
5

Phyllis Diller is a tough act to follow. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mH66_tFP8VA
/r/MensRights30/08/12 01:24 PM
-2

First of all, I need to state that I am a pansexual cisgendered femme female. I have a cisfemale partner and a cismale partner, and date openly in a polyamorous relationship. Too much fucking politically correct feminist hipster-talk. Too many first-world problems. Finish your Women's Studies degree, get a fucking job, be nice, and help other people be nice. You are not the center of the fucking universe.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 01:13 PM
8

Women constitute an overwhelming majority of eligible voters in every state except Alaska. There has not been a female President because women prefer men. And because women neglect their obligation to public service by refusing to enter elections.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 12:46 PM
0

You think her feet are that big?
/r/MensRights30/08/12 12:44 PM
15

Why don't the hearts of feminists sink for their sons?
/r/MensRights30/08/12 12:44 PM
1

In her confession, the girl says she thought her boyfriend might be angry that she was late returning to their hotel. http://phuketwan.com/tourism/phuket-tuk-tuk-rape-case-aussie-woman-goes-free-bail-16179/
/r/MensRights27/08/12 06:43 PM
1

I'm not sure I get your point. Can you be more specific? The girl admitted to her crime. She was sentenced to 15 days, to be served at Bang Jo detention center, which is sort of a halfway house, rather than the provincial prison. The conditions at Bang Jo are much better. Ultimately, she was released on bail and deported. She served none of her 15 day sentence. This was done under judicial oversight. This is no different than in the U.S. If a non-citizen admits to a crime, the result might be co…
/r/MensRights27/08/12 06:42 PM
1

More on this story: http://www.phuketgazette.net/archives/articles/2012/article16190.html
/r/MensRights27/08/12 03:17 PM
3

Unless it is bear mace, your cracked out rape fueled street junkie will just think you are pissin on em. You don't know what you are talking about.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 04:31 AM
3

That does not change the accuracy of the statement that handguns are considered a man's weapon. There are lots of male secretaries, but it is still considered a woman's job. There are lots of males that wear cosmetics...join the choir in jr. high...crochet...
/r/MensRights27/08/12 04:29 AM
1

Like women, men can put pepper spray in their backpacks when they are in the office, and then carry it in their hands in the parking garage.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 04:26 AM
1

Is there a difference in the actual rate of prosecution and the actual sentence. That's what matters, not the theoretical limit.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 04:22 AM
1

How many women have been prosecuted? What were their sentences compared to the sentence of male rapists?
/r/MensRights27/08/12 04:21 AM
2

Now start spreading the news.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 04:21 AM
3

Do this quickly. The first to the courthouse has some advantages. You want to be the plaintiff, not the defendant. Don't waste a minute.t Do not talk to mom or anyone that might talk with mom. You do not want to alert her to your plans. After she has fired the first shot, do not try to reason with her. You can do that after you file a lawsuit, and drop it later, but by talking with her, you give her the opportunity to file first, to deduce your plans and legal theories, and so on. File first, th…
/r/MensRights25/08/12 08:33 AM
2

We were discussing terrorism because of an allusion to them it in the book we were reading, and several girls made comments such as, "Oh gosh, I hope the TSA installs body scanners at airports and makes me take off my shoes," and "I hope the police harass tourists for taking photos of bridges and dams." We got into the debate and eventually a girl admitted that the threat of terrorism is extremely small, and her fear was grossly out of proportion, and actually harmful to herself and all of the i…
/r/MensRights24/08/12 12:33 PM
1

I agree. Make the police work for you, but to do that, contact a criminal lawyer first. If you can afford it.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 03:31 PM
2

Why do you care about upvotes? And why do yoou care about upvotes for other people? When you were in third grade, did you squeal, "Why does Tammy get a gold star, but Eric didn't get one?!"
/r/MensRights22/08/12 06:35 AM
1

Can you show me a meaningful number of feminists that demand women register for Selective Service? At least until some men's righs group can start up the effort in a new generation and better the efforts of feminists 30 years ago. You are unaware of advocates for equality that want to end discrimination against men with respect to Selective Service? That speaks to your knowledge of equality advocates, not their interests and activities. Whatever seat men are in, when the seek gender equality, th…
/r/MensRights20/08/12 09:19 AM
1

What tangible efforts has NOW made? What tangible efforts has the ACLU Women's Project made in the last 30 years? Are these the words you want me to think about? "Oddly enough there is a backward movement among feminists to make women eligible for the draft in the name of equality." "There absolutely is." Neither feminists NOR men's rights groups are ever going to put that kind of energy into fighting for draft reform until...the government is trying to institute an actual draft.** So your're "m…
/r/MensRights19/08/12 11:59 PM
5

I'm consed. You told me there is "absolutely" a movement to conscript women. Instead of showing evidence of it, now you think there isn't one because feminists are not going to "put that kind of energy into fighting for draft reform until it's too goddamned late...opposing it with words is all anybody does." So there is no "movement", right?
/r/MensRights19/08/12 06:45 PM
-2

You think women are going to fight for the right to die after a war starts? What did the Kool-Aid taste like? opposing it with words is all anybody does. Maybe it's all you do. Charles Rangle does more. Robert Goldberg did more. Feminists opposed them.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 06:26 PM
2

File your own lawsuit. I did. I don't want a woman's movement to do anything. I want an equality movement that includes everyone. To achieve this, we have to acknowledge that feminism is not an equality movement. I have made a career out of doing my part for men and women. You are invited to join me. There is no hard limit on healthcare spending or DV spending. There is a Violence Against Women Act that has provided hundreds of millions of dollars exclusively for female victims. No feminists hav…
/r/MensRights19/08/12 06:23 PM
0

I'm not going to comment on a "movement" necessarily That's what this thread is about. I have no doubt there are some women who say want equality. But they don't want it enough to do anything about it. In the last 30 years, what feminists have taken actin to achieve equality in conscription? And if feminists by any definition take action to take healthcare money away men for exclusive use by women, if feminists by any definition take action to prevent violence against women, but not by violence …
/r/MensRights19/08/12 04:46 PM
17

No they don't. In 1980, they made an unsupported resolution to oppose the draft, and in "if we cannot stop the return to registration and draft, we also cannot choose between sisters and brothers. We oppose any registration or draft that excludes women as an unconstitutional denial of rights to both young men and women. And we continue to oppose all sex discrimination by the volunteer armed services." But in 1981, they refused to support the plaintiffs in Rostker v. Goldberg. After ignoring the …
/r/MensRights19/08/12 04:37 PM
11

Show me the Million Mom March on the Capitol demanding that women be drafted. Show me the article in Ms. Magazine, the petition drive with hundreds of thousands of signatures, the editorials in major newspapers, demanding that women be drafted. Show me the lobbyists hired by NOW, or the lawsuits before the courts, or the plank in the platform of a political party demanding that women be drafted. In which Congressional committee is the bill to draft women? In which AAUW fundraising letter does th…
/r/MensRights19/08/12 02:56 PM
2

Prison, denial of student loans, ineligible for government jobs, a long list of other things.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 12:59 PM
3

Oddly enough there is a backward movement among feminists to make women eligible for the draft in the name of equality. No there isn't.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 12:58 PM
1

Your lawyer advised you to have sex with a drunk woman under some circumstances. Your lawyer advised you to have sex while you are drunk. You need a new lawyer.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 03:33 AM
2

I do not assume that concurring with the Google definition is radical. It is very mainstream. This thread shows that.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 08:11 PM
1

Run this by your lawyer, please. She might tell you, Never have sex with someone that is intoxicated, period. And she may tell you that while making a report is a good idea, it will not protect you from prosecution.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 08:09 PM
1

Men are routinely prosecuted, No woman has ever been prosecuted. It is therefor, not illegal for a woman to rape a man under these circumstances. The mere fact that the statute exists does not make it illega. There is a statute in Colorado that says that car dealers can't operate on Sunday, but since the law in never enforced, it can be said that it is legal for cars to be sold on Sundays. In the same way, it is legal for a woman to rape a man who is too drunk to consent.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 08:07 PM
1

I'll bet there are thousands of feminists working for Google that concur with that definition. In spite of the publicity, Google has not changed their dictionary entry.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 08:02 PM
1

Yes there's always been a separate draft for qualified individuals with special skills Sure, doctors, et al, that would otherwise be ineligible have been drafted under special rules. But not women.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 07:59 PM
4

What you originally said was, "men aren't the only ones to be conscripted." In fact, women have not been conscripted in the US, are not presently, and there is no law that provides for conscription of females in the future. If you have contradictory evidence, you have not shown it. While there has not been a draft since 1973, there has been and remains a Selective Service. There will continue to be a Selective Service in the future. No women are required to register. There is no reason to believ…
/r/MensRights14/08/12 07:58 PM
1

Your claim is false. I said that men are routinely prosecuted. I said that no woman has ever been prosecuted.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 06:09 PM
2

"The Health Care Personnel Delivery System (HCPDS) is a standby plan developed for the Selective Service System at the request of Congress." "if Congress and the President approve the plan and pass and sign legislation to enact it." It does not exist. It is wargaming. No woman has ever been required to register for the Selective Service. No woman is currently under any requirement to do so. There is no law requiring any woman to do so in the future. You seem to think that the fact that such a la…
/r/MensRights14/08/12 06:06 PM
-1

My username does not inlcude the term "MRA". You want proof of no prosecutions? You think courts keep records of cases not brought? I wonder how that would work.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 05:54 PM
5

You didn't read it, did you? "This paper recommends an operational concept..." "...when enacted would provide..." "...will be reviewing options..." "...will make the final decision at the proper time..." "...this concept envisions..." "Males already registered..." Where is the part where women are required to register for the Selective service? Also, how many women were drafted in WW1, WW2, Korea, Viet Nam? How many in the Post-Viet Nam era? What evidence do you have that women are conscripted i…
/r/MensRights14/08/12 05:53 PM
6

In the U.S. women register for the Selective Service? Can you show some evidence for this? How many women were drafted in WW1, WW2, Korea, Viet Nam? How many in the Post-Viet Nam era?
/r/MensRights14/08/12 05:11 PM
1

Do you have some contradictory evidence?
/r/MensRights14/08/12 05:08 PM
1

It's true.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 04:35 PM
2

Men are regularly prosecuted under these circumstances. In the U.S., no woman has ever been prosecuted for rape under the definition of alcohol impaired ability to consent.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 01:34 PM
2

Collecting data from police reports tells us who reports DV, not who perpetrates it.
/r/MensRights11/08/12 04:55 AM
14

How many women took bullets for their boyfriends?
/r/MensRights22/07/12 08:49 PM
3

If a man says, "Not until the condom is on," but the woman surprises him with penetration, she will be prosecuted for rape, right?
/r/MensRights16/07/12 05:26 PM
2

I thought marriage was a union under civil (or common) law. Why is a civil union different than marriage? Why would a civil union be better than not getting married?
/r/MensRights16/07/12 05:23 PM
3

I don't understand why nobody posted this in 2x, or r/women, or r/feminisms. It's a women's issue, right?
/r/MensRights09/07/12 02:56 AM
2

Thanks for that suggestion. Could you please visit fathersandfamilies.org for your own edification?
/r/MensRights01/07/12 07:36 AM
2

Please buy copies of "The Myth of Male Power" by Dr. Warren Farrell and "The War Against Boys" by Dr. Christina Hoff Sommers and give them to these lecturers, then follow up to make sure they have read and digested them. In doing so, please volunteer to find copies of the source material that is cited by each author in the footnotes if John and Terri are willing to read it.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 12:10 AM
-2

WHY DO YOU HATE WOMEN, THEDEVGUY? CHECK YOUR PRIVILEGE! TROLL!
/r/MensRights29/06/12 06:41 AM
5

Video, video, video.
/r/MensRights23/06/12 04:59 PM
1

I understand compassion toward those incarcerated far from home, even if they are evil cunts. What I don't understand is the absence of compassion toward the wrongfully accused. In the Australian government, whose job is it to comfort this woman's victims. Or in the Thai government? Or in your neighborhood?
/r/MensRights19/06/12 12:45 PM
2

Prosecution IS the standard response to false allegations, except for crimes against women. If you falsely report to police that you were robbed at gunpoint, it is likely you will be prosecuted. If you falsely report that your car was damaged by a hit-and-run driver, you will be prosecuted. If you make a false insurance or welfare claim, you will be prosecuted. Impunity is ONLY for women who make false allegations of violence or sexual impropriety toward men. And we don't stop at impunity, often…
/r/MensRights18/06/12 04:10 PM
1

The Thai court sentenced this criminal to 15 days in jail. Let me assure you that 15 days is a considerably shorter sentennce than those for convicted rapists. But is it shorter than others serving time for false accusations? Who knows, because being sent to jail for such a crime is even less likely in Thailand than it is in the U.S. Let me be clear about that. This prosecution should not be taken to mean that Thailand cares any more about punishing false accusers than the U.S. In fact, the oppo…
/r/MensRights18/06/12 03:32 PM
19

The U.S. Army does not patrol the terminals at Myrtle Beach.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 06:36 AM
0

No, but if you want to call me a troll, it's okay. Here is a free photo of Juliet Mills from Nanny and the Professor. I hope it makes you feel better. http://cache2.allpostersimages.com/p/LRG/59/5931/F74RG00Z/posters/juliet-mills-nanny-and-the-professor.jpg
/r/MensRights24/04/12 02:54 AM
1

I don't think it's imbecilic to facetiously satirize people that cling to absurd dogma like, "There is no excuse for hitting a woman", but I don't mind if you do.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 05:09 PM
0

Yes. All of them. As my way of saying, "Thank you for playing," here is a free photo of Randall "Tex" Cobb: http://www.phillyboxinghistory.com/boxingcards/cardcobb_tex.jpg
/r/MensRights23/04/12 10:32 AM
-1

Nothing. I was just messin' with you. But you win a free photo of Dom Delouise just for playing: http://www.movieactors.com/photos-stars/dom-deluise-cannonball12.jpg
/r/MensRights23/04/12 02:04 AM
-2

What makes you think that i hate women ?! Obviously you like beating women, because as soon as I said there is no excuse for it, you attacked me. Typical man - lash out at anything that threatens your power to dominate and control women.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 05:32 PM
-8

Why do you hate women so much?
/r/MensRights22/04/12 12:26 PM
-5

There is never an excuse to hit a woman."
/r/MensRights22/04/12 05:05 AM
-4

Obviously you don't understand the rule. The rule is, "Never hit a woman."
/r/MensRights22/04/12 03:52 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter