TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TrulyStupidNewb Archive

View 6 posts and 184 comments by TrulyStupidNewb on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You make good points and yes, I've learned much of that from watching Karen Straughan's videos. You are right that most men had no right to vote in the past. Only landowners had rights to vote, and most people were not landowners. Also, women were able to own businesses and land for hundreds of years. However, if you were a married woman in most countries in the past, it was more difficult to own land compared to a man of similar income. In some countries in the past, marriage was uneven in that…
/r/MensRights07/10/22 04:20 PM
1

I disagree. I believe the Declaration of Sentiments was such because women back in those days did not have equal rights under the law. A lot of Men's Rights Activists are extremely bitter at people who openly oppress men, and rightfully so, because if you were being actively oppressed, it is your right to be bitter. It is your right to be bitter about things such as unfair sentencing in court. Just like "some" men are bitter today, I can understand if the women back in those days were bitter. Wh…
/r/MensRights07/10/22 02:47 PM
0

Just for the record, I was not the one who downvoted you. Feminism started with very broad goals of making women equal with men. As a result, if we go back to the root definition of feminism, it used to be about gender equality. But then they embraced Russian socialist propaganda that transformed the class war into an identity war in an effort to destabilize the west. We have solid evidence that Russia during the cold war tried to infiltrate class movements like feminism and black lives matter, …
/r/MensRights06/10/22 04:41 PM
1

I believe feminism has been hijacked by socialists by the Russians during the cold war. They weren't originally about socialism, but they've let themselves be infiltrated and they embraced Russian propaganda.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 03:48 PM
4

Come on. You know full well that's not what that person said. That's such a strawman. It is going too far to assume that someone who identifies in a movement agrees with everything that is mainstream in that movement. No movement is a monolith. Just like how people in the men's right movement can disagree, so can feminists.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 03:39 PM
2

It could be, expect she saw two psychiatrists and neither could explain. I'm not ruling out it couldn't be mental illness. It could also have been drugs (more reasons not to get wasted or do drugs). If she suspected a mental illness, she should have got help, let her friends and family know, and not lose her phone or be separated from her friends. The problem is that there is no evidence or even circumstancial evidence to prove her claim. I bet it sucks for her not to be able to prove it, but it…
/r/MensRights02/08/19 02:23 PM
17

Addressing the 3rd Facebook comment about "what sort of man makes this public", it was naturally public because of the divorce and the lawsuit for paternity fraud.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 03:16 PM
1

I agree. I am against capital punishment.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 03:12 PM
29

It's probably a terrible feeling that I can't even imagine. People probably won't understand the feeling until they have experienced it himself. The feeling of being betrayed and deceived for over 20 years.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 03:07 PM
-9

There is no indicator that MrHolte didn't understand your point. An anecdote doesn't disprove a trend, so we shouldn't feel threatened as such.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 03:05 PM
-12

Hey, I upvoted you. You're absolutely right. The man was probably not robbed of fathering his own children, because the doctor said he couldn't have children. People have to understand that facts and narratives can coexist side by side. What MrHolte said didn't dismiss the fact that many men are robbed of their opportunity for fathering their own children. However, there might be another man who might be robbed from fathering his own children: the man who is the actual father. In the article: “I…
/r/MensRights08/01/19 03:02 PM
2

I posted on askfeminists for the same reasons, and I was super respectful about it. But then I got banned. Only feminists could post in a top-level comment. I didn't post in a top level comment, but the mod banned me and attached that rule as the reason. The feminists in the subreddit noticed that my"deleted message" was not top level, and they replied to the mod's reason, and downvoted the mod's comment so that the mod was at -50 karma. So, the mod simply deleted his post, but he/she didn't ack…
/r/MensRights11/06/18 02:00 PM
2

That means a woman will win every single court trial if there aren't any women on the opposition. How is that a fair trial?
/r/MensRights13/09/17 06:50 PM
3

Despite literally hundreds of conversations with feminists and antifa, I've never been blocked on facebook except once by an antifa group called libertarian socialist. I've been blocked a few times on reddit from twoxchromosomes and askfeminists. 1) The key to having a conversation with these people is to find someone who is willing to use facts and reasoning to win their argument rather than shaming and rage. Respond to each person with a factual, rational, and very calm-headed counterargument.…
/r/MensRights14/08/17 02:34 PM
8

Because their ideology tells them they've got those groups figured out already. Precisely why in order not to become like them, I have a bunch of feminist activists on my friends list and have intellectual debates with them every week. I have an antifa online contact who I talk to regularly about the latest politics. Of course, having just a few people I talk to doesn't mean I now understand the group as a whole, but it does help.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 06:08 PM
25

Usually, when I watch "feminist gets pwned by so-and-so", the actual video turns out to be mediocre. But this video was one of the best I've ever seen and it gave me chills. This guy was so amazingly composed, rational and factual that it was like watching someone walking away from an explosion that is the feminist narrative.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 06:05 PM
10

Even if you are alone in a deserted island, the patriarchy somehow follows you.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 02:50 PM
5

Don't forget when Harvard suggested companies roll back blind recruitment when they found out that omitting the name actually favoured men compared to showing the names. http://dailycaller.com/2017/06/30/study-blind-recruitment-aimed-at-boosting-female-hires-actually-does-the-opposite/ Actions done in the name of equality are removed the moment they don't favour the target demographic.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 05:59 PM
1

I once made a sexist joke on /r/jokes: Have you heard of womanspreading? It's when a parked car takes up two parking spaces.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 09:56 PM
12

Another way to increase efficiency is to install women's urinals. But, American women generally do not like women's urinals, because "it's not their thing". Their choice, but don't complain if men are more efficient because they are willing to use urinals and you aren't.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 02:26 PM
3

They are getting offended by people getting offended after getting called trash. That's next level.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 02:05 AM
2

She broke the law by using a phone while driving. The cycling broke the law by kicking the mirror. She broke the law by running him over, then lying to court.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 03:30 PM
1

Thanks for the constructive criticism. I noticed a weird thing about the Completion Rate chart. It says: "The regional averages are based on countries with available data on the period 2009 - 2015." But what bothers me is that they don't have data available for UK, Canada, USA, etc. If you take a look at these countries, they are blank. Why did they remove them? If you take a look at the link I originally posted, USA, Canada, UK, etc, do have data concerning graduation. But it's omitted in the u…
/r/MensRights03/05/17 05:44 PM
3

What's interesting is that the gender of the perpetrator was never mentioned. It wasn't about who was hitting. It was about who is being hit. Notice the guys says "That's like it's fine to hit a girl for being a bitch". Neither he or she didn't mention it was a man hitting.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 03:40 PM
9

Yeah, it seems the only person justifying hitting people was the woman. The guy actually made a point that hitting people is wrong. Then the woman took it as a justification for domestic abuse. I bet if the guy was physically nearby, she would have hit him as well.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 03:37 PM
1

I don't see this story as a failed rejection revenge story. I see this as a failed attempt of robbery through deception, followed by a backup plan using force with a weapon. Judging from the knife, the pair of women probably wanted to rob the men if they accepted. They followed the men home with a concealed weapon. They plotted together. Judging the news, the other woman wasn't surprised when her friend wielded the knife. She didn't try to stop her friend. They must have expected it, planned it …
/r/MensRights11/04/17 08:16 PM
16

Slashing? If a man merely threatened with a knife, many people would still said he had it coming.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 10:26 PM
1

I'm sure guys would love women sending them naked selfies. I don't think there is a double standard here. Just that men and women are different. Note that throughout the interaction, she was more offended than he was, and he was the one getting harassed more. Another way to look at this is, imagine if I told you a joke. Then you proceed to tell me jokes every 5 minutes, and waking me up in the middle of the night to tell me a joke, flooding my mailbox, then posting my picture and interaction on …
/r/MensRights03/04/17 03:34 PM
3

(checks date of post)....April fools?! She got me good. Almost thought she was serious there for a moment.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 02:18 PM
2

I have little doubt that she is guilty. But, I would have wanted more of the story, because if we want to protest this case, more information would help our case. I want to share this story around to raise awareness for violence against men.
/r/MensRights17/02/17 07:57 PM
5

I'm frustrated that the articles didn't mention if she sustained any injuries. I feel that we are missing key evidence that the jury might have access to.
/r/MensRights17/02/17 06:48 PM
1

The only difference is that slaves had no choice. Women have the choice of what they want to do with their lives. If they want to be slaves, that their choice. My advice is, stop being a slave and start living the life you want. Want to be an engineer? Noone's stopping you. Want to go shopping? Noone's stopping you. Want to take a break from watching TV and read a book instead? Noone's stopping you. The problem with feminism is that the door is already wide open for women, and they BY CHOICE dec…
/r/MensRights17/02/17 03:01 PM
8

“I fully believed it was going to be my final night,” she said. “I was just looking for something to cut. I stabbed him twice.” If her daughter was in the room, if what she said was true, she would have cut her daughter too. I don't buy her statement for a second. The news article doesn't cover the man's side of the story. Coincidence?
/r/MensRights17/02/17 01:54 PM
29

"She did not want him to win the custody of their daughter." So when she can't win with a rigged system, she resorts to attempted murder? And with a meat cleaver at that. Makes me worried how many psychotic violent mothers get custody of their children just because they are women.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 03:04 PM
401

She didn't feel remorse on the first day of torture. She didn't feel remorse on the second day of torture. She didn't feel remorse on the third day of torture. She didn't feel remorse on the fourth day of torture. She didn't feel remorse on the fifth day of torture. She didn't feel remorse on the sixth day of torture. She didn't feel remorse on the seventh day of torture. ...... She enjoyed her nearly 3 weeks of torture so much that she decided to murder him. To me, the irony is not that she app…
/r/MensRights24/01/17 07:38 AM
2

The patriarchy did this! Oh yeah, and Russia hacked the cover.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 06:54 PM
1

I see and respect your point. I'm also glad that you laid out your opinion like you you did. It's very hard for a movement with no leader and no membership to get rid of morons. We can denounce them or ban them, but the latter is rarely a good solution. Feminists usually denounce and ban people who disagree with them, rather than those who perpetuate hate and violence. You see, banning people has the side effect of shutting down discussion. It also doesn't fix the radicals. They'll just take the…
/r/MensRights06/01/17 06:39 PM
1

Thank you for being the voice of reason. It takes a lot to keep our cool when we see injustice all around us, but we must persevere. Like you said, facts and logic win over in the end. Fighting injustice with feels will only turn us into another justice warrior. We are better than that. We have to provide the truth and the whole truth, even the parts that are inconvenient to us.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 08:26 PM
1

This is the full link of the product bundle: https://shop.pocketwizard.com/products/tutu-pink-plus-iii-bonus-bundle This is the actual product: http://www.pocketwizard.com/products/transmitter_receiver/plus%20iii/
/r/MensRights05/01/17 07:03 PM
7

‘I was not in my right mind. After all, who blackmails a police officer?’ She's so close to self-awareness. So close, yet so far. her mother would not let her return to the family home. Someone's got style.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 06:53 PM
1

The title and article are poorly written, and the claim is misleading. However, if the article does something right, it raises awareness about injustice. Fortunately, many people in MensRights fact-check the claims, and thanks to /u/McFeely_Smackup, we now have a better picture of what happened. We should protest the quality of the article not here, but at the daily mail. It's their fault that people are getting a false image of what really happened. That's unacceptable. Who wants to post a comm…
/r/MensRights05/01/17 06:45 PM
16

If you don't agree with MensRights, it's your choice. Call me crazy, but I don't find it inhuman to get riled up over a police officer who was jailed 21 years without proper investigation and with false evidence. Don't forget that it was also MensRights that pointed out inconsistencies in the headline, and notice that the person who pointed out inconsistency was upvoted over 700 times. MensRights care about facts, and the upvotes attest to that. The article itself was not written by MensRights, …
/r/MensRights05/01/17 06:41 PM
1

Thanks for the link! There is nothing quite like making your point against the mainstream narrative with hardcore evidence. I suppose the most hardcore evidence would be the laws themselves as they were written. Unfortunately, I'm not a legal expert. Perhaps on day I will read the laws directly.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 05:14 AM
2

Karen Straughan (GirlWritesWhat) is my hero and my favourite MRA, no offense to anybody else. She is the reason why I am who I am today, and the reason why I frequent this subreddit.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 04:59 AM
2

He needs a strong woman around to "teach him how to respect women". A strong woman doesn't need to isolate her own son from his father in order to teach him something. Having to resort to isolation tactics is a sign of weakness and abuse. For example, a partner who tries to isolate their love interest from his/her family and friends is a bad sign, and not a sign of strength.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 04:49 AM
4

(a) there are more men in positions of overt power Counting only the ones at the top is a fallacy. Let me provide an example. China overtook USA in GDP recently. Beijing overtook New York as the billionaire capital. A feminist can take a look at the high number of the powerful and wealthy Chinese, and come to the conclusion that Chinese people are, in general, more privileged and live better lives than Americans. This is because they only look at the top of the ladder, not at the bottom. Only 2%…
/r/MensRights05/01/17 04:31 AM
3

Some people in social justice are literally participating in physical book burning. I think that one of our duties as people in this world is to keep our history intact for others in the distant future. We have to do what we can to keep all important records of history, both the politically convenient and politically inconvenient.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 05:45 PM
1

Thanks for the insight. You're right. A lot of the military have inadequate pay. I would correct my post, but I will leave it as it is instead so that your comment still stays relevant. I really appreciate it. I based my experience on some of my friends who worked for the RCMP (Canadian Force), one of them who worked all his life as a clarinet player. His pay was good, enough to support 4 daughters and retire in a house fully paid for. But he was a clarinet player, and I suppose I do know very l…
/r/MensRights04/01/17 05:37 PM
9

Karen Straughan (GirlWritesWhat) explains it in depth in one of her videos. Otherwise, any article on coverture would be a nice start. I actually dislike wikipedia, as they are getting increasingly feminist compliant. But I'm lazy, so: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coverture You're right. Early women's rights history is highly politicized, because revealing too much about the truth will hurt feminism's narrative. Like people say, the winner writes history.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 09:56 AM
4

When I posted my rant, I did not intend it to get upvoted that much. As a result, I didn't provide any sources. In order to understand my point of view, you need to read encyclopedia articles on the tender years, early feminism, early family court, early women's rights, Christianity, and marriage. There is no article that I know that compiles all these data to prove my point, but you can read about each individually. If you want a lazy read, you can check out the article on wikipedia. Although i…
/r/MensRights04/01/17 09:47 AM
2

Feminism isn't the only movement that has lost its meaning and roots. Liberalism is also in danger of losing its way. The original idea of liberalism is for smaller government, more freedom, freedom of religion and freedom from religion. However, most liberals these days prefer larger government in order to sustain the massive number of government programs that these "liberals" demand. They are also mostly in favour of partial censorship of emotionally and politically sensitive speech. Today, li…
/r/MensRights04/01/17 03:14 AM
8

I support Christian Hoff Sommers' Freedom Feminism. I have done so for years, and I will continue to do so. Feminism is VERY diverse. I made a post years ago on another thread in /r/askfeminism explaining all the types of feminism. It was as long as an essay. I identified at least 12 points where feminists disagree, including marriage, prostitution, choice feminism, the portrayal of women in media, and such. I suggest you start a new branch of feminism, sort of like Christian Hoff Sommers. The m…
/r/MensRights04/01/17 02:46 AM
48

I'm 100% with you. You have a very good point. But don't forget I said feminism created the tender years doctrine. They didn't create the idea that women are better caregivers. They just implemented into law as if it were truth. This law played out through numerous court cases, and strengthened the lie. Why do I call it a lie? Aren't females biologically more interested in taking care of children? The thing is that the tender years doctrine is not based on women being more interested in taking c…
/r/MensRights04/01/17 02:28 AM
260

Many years ago, I created a topic on /r/askfeminists discussing this exact problem. I didn't insult anybody, didn't downvote a single comment, and always provided plenty of sources to back every bit of argument. I wasn't confrontational. I only used polite language and was open to disagreements and to new ideas. I agreed with them where I thought they made sense, and backed my disagreements with reliable academic sources. This resulted me in me getting banned, for presenting too much evidence th…
/r/MensRights04/01/17 12:17 AM
1315

The crazy thing about feminism is that it hurts both men and women. Back in the old days, child custody was uncomplicated. The children goes with the parents who is most capable of financially and physically supporting them. Then came feminism. They created the tender years doctrine that women are the natural care givers, and that children need to be with their mother. This caused family courts to favour the mother for the first time for NO REASON OTHER THAN HER GENDER (aka sexism). Feminism int…
/r/MensRights03/01/17 08:52 PM
43

As terrible as this story is, I've read at least a few cases where the female driver killed a motorcyclist in an accident where she was at fault, and didn't get any jail time. http://www.americanews.com/story/crime/2015/11/06/no-jail-only-500-fine-21-year-old-woman-who-hit-killed-motorcyclist-while Although this story differs from the one in the topic, because she didn't cause injury with malicious intent. In this story for this thread, she was clearly driving to kill. Then again, there was a wo…
/r/MensRights03/01/17 08:25 PM
1

No doubt a side-effect of Canada's feminist prime minister, Justin Trudeau. I'm already looking for a conservative replacement for Trudeau in 2019.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 10:05 PM
4

Heads, I win. Tails, you lose.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 09:48 PM
21

You know what is funny? My girlfriend, who is a web programmer, criticizes her male boss for not explaining complicated procedures slowly, simply, and explicitly enough. Think about it for a moment. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 09:44 PM
1

Agreed. I took nothing tangible from this study. We already know about the pink tax and that women would be willing to pay more for quality or specialty products. But this study adds nothing credible.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 11:27 PM
1

This means that after having sex with anybody, you are at the mercy of their feelings for the rest of your life, or face years to life in jail. But then, if someone accuses you of rape using this logic, you can accuse them of rape right back. Oh wait, people don't give a shit about men. Most women feel bad about cheating, so it's technically rape. Many women also feel bad about their first lesbian encounter, so that's rape too. Hey that means I can have sex with my cat, and if I didn't like it, …
/r/MensRights11/11/16 11:17 PM
2

My client could not see any way out. It sounds like she has terrible problem solving skills. OF COURSE. When a woman does an act of violence, it's the man's fault. When a man does an act of violence, it's the man's fault. Everybody tries to pin the blame on the man, no matter how stupid or desperate the situation. Men are basically born scapegoats, led to the slaughter for everyone's sins. The image of Jesus is particularly strong in my mind. Forgive them, men's rights. For they know not what th…
/r/MensRights11/11/16 09:28 PM
1

To me, a statement like "I hate that our culture makes me miss being catcalled" sounds nearly as poorly interpreted as: "My wife just died. I hate that our culture makes me miss her."
/r/MensRights07/10/16 02:11 PM
14

We should do some sort of brain tease on feminists. Next time they complain about women being equal, we can ask "so you think that women are equally incapable as men?" I'm sure one or two will say, "No, woman are not as incapable as men." If they say that, we can prove that they are female supremacists.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 02:02 PM
1

It's great the sessions were not mandatory. Personally, I believe that consent should be taught by the parents, and before college. If people who go to college still need consent classes, then something is wrong with our society. Either there is too much assumption that people don't know what consent is, or there are too many people who don't know what is consent by age 18. Consent should be learned at age 12-14. Not at age 18. Consent classes that are targeting males are similar to classes spec…
/r/MensRights03/10/16 12:19 PM
10

Why not focus your papers on women in 3rd world countries and Islamic nations? That way, you can speak truth and draw attention to situations that matter.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 10:12 PM
6

"George Lawlor was bullied online and branded a 'rapist' and 'misogynist' by activists last year after he dared to question consent workshops." It's ironic that people who call skeptical people "rapists" are those who need consent classes. Because it is obvious that they don't know what rape actually is. Okay, some special snowflakes actually need people to help them distinguish the difference between rape and submitting an opinion online. But just because some people are retarded, does that mea…
/r/MensRights29/09/16 09:59 PM
1

men only love two things in this world:" The good news is that in the "other" world (aka the real one), men are actually surprisingly diverse. Too bad she's stuck in her world.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 09:40 PM
8

I wish that were true. She was with him for 6 years and had two kids together. Who knows how much money she got from his from outlandish gift requests, and how much more she'll get out of child support. Lets hope that he can legally refuse to pay child support until she pays him back the £6k, but somehow I feel that's not the case. Best thing he can do is get custody of the kids by proving she's an irresponsible mother who choose her boobs and career over putting effort in making sure her kids h…
/r/MensRights08/09/16 02:43 PM
10

In order for Yale to be more dangerous than Detroit, you have to have more than: 5 reported murders per year 10 reported forcible rape per year 120 reported robberies per year 412 aggravated assaults per year 675 motor vehicle theft per year This only counts students, and doesn't include staff. If you include the staff, add an extra 35% to the number of reported crimes. This means that Yale needs 2 student cars stolen every day just to match with Detroit. How I got the numbers: https://en.wikipe…
/r/MensRights31/08/16 12:00 AM
2

I was going to trash this article until I actually read it. I admit this article isn't for everyone. To the average citizen, the "information" in this article is dumbed down, perhaps even insultingly simplistic. This article was directed at teenage girls. We know that teenage girls might not be the brightest of the bunch. They make mistakes, do stupid things, and can be either too trusting, too irresponsible, or too weary. Lots of teenage girls, with their out-of-control hormones, might believe …
/r/MensRights30/08/16 05:23 PM
0

Clearly someone isn't lovin' it.
/r/MensRights30/08/16 04:56 PM
2

My girlfriend said that she is voting for the first time in her life to get Trudeau out. It hasn't been a year and she's already had enough. And you're right. Quoting an international figure in order to use as a correction guideline for our own policies is bad planning. It's like saying that many people globally don't have enough food, so you change the daily recommended calorie intake to 3700 to compensate. It's stupid.
/r/MensRights25/08/16 11:57 PM
6

People who come from Manhattan, Manchester won't be able to correctly identify where they live. If there is anything good coming from this, at least we get to ban Mandi Gray for no other reason than her name. She should change her name to People D. Gray to be more inclusive. People also won't be able to say "Oh man" and "Oh brother". I also demand they change "Oh God" and "Oh my God" to "Oh my Gods and Goddesses" to be more gender inclusive.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 02:18 PM
4

In a world where schools teach children as if they were girls, many feminists still believe that male is the default gender and that society is pandering to men.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 02:11 PM
12

Only up to 220,000 people were killed by military nuclear bombs, which is less than .004% the total world population today. As a result, nuclear bombs are not a threat, and we should ignore nuclear issues and focus on more important things, like manspreading.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 02:01 PM
4

The 2% was likely what was written on the carton of milk the writer was drinking when writing the article. If you're homo, the stats go up to 3.25% or 4%. Creamy gets 10%.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 01:54 PM
14

I stare at men's breasts all the time. I read what's on their T-shirt. Does this mean I hate men? I don't stare at women's breasts because they usually have nothing interesting written on their T-shirt. I don't understand how admiration is related to hate. If I stare at a Ferrari, do I hate Ferraris? People stare for many potential reasons. You can't know for certain if people stare out of hate, rather than something else, like lust, curiosity, or maybe they are zoned out and just looking throug…
/r/MensRights12/08/16 01:58 PM
1

Some Atheists bash on everyone who's a Christian, and this alone doesn't make them necessarily racist. If Atheists or Liberals bashing on Christians are okay, but Republicans bashing on Muslims are racist, then it's a massive double standard. And I hate double standards. The idea that one disadvantaged group cannot be criticized is a tactic used commonly by social justice in order to shut conversation. This is the reverse of the days when people were not allowed to criticize the king, and a comp…
/r/MensRights04/08/16 09:23 PM
1

I respect that you have a different view, and I can see where you're coming from. Unlike you, I'm not American, so I don't have the perspective of being an American or an invested interest on what Americans need. If you don't like Trump, I definitely won't ask you to vote for him. As we both know, the media has literally been DUMPING on Trump pretty much since they considered him a threat. Sure, the media can say what they want. It's free speech. But what I'm concerned about is the media spreadi…
/r/MensRights04/08/16 09:17 PM
2

I live in Montreal, Canada. I've lived in Calgary, Toronto, and Ottawa. I've also visited Vancouver. I think that you can be outside in Vancouver all season, if it wasn't for the constant rain. From what I see in Montreal, we have good resources for cycling, tennis, and hockey. Montreal is one of the friendliest place for cyclists, with numerous city bike lanes and off-road trials. We also have a lot of tennis resources, and the Rogers Cup is held here. We also have a winter Olympic stadium, whi…
/r/MensRights04/08/16 04:07 PM
2

If we ended the war on drugs they wouldn't be so eager to smuggle them across the border anyways. I agree with you here. Even though I'm not a big fan of Justin Trudeau (Canada's PM), one area that I agree on is legalizing drugs. I'm not a drug user. Never was, never will be. But even I am aware enough to know that fighting drugs will just give rise to illegal market opportunities from poorer countries, impoverish the country fighting drugs, physically endanger everybody involved, and promote cr…
/r/MensRights04/08/16 03:45 PM
2

banning all Muslims and Mexicans from entering the country! That's not exactly what Trump said. Maybe that's how the media portrayed it in order to make it sound worse than it is. If you're a Muslim from 99% of the world, you'll be as welcome into America as anyone else. The only areas where there will be an immigration ban is areas where ISIS is dominant. This isn't a ban targeted based on religion, but a ban on ISIS. Also note that the temporary ban doesn't only affect Muslims. Even if you're …
/r/MensRights04/08/16 03:01 PM
3

At least in the off chance that a giant Trump rampages down New York city and raze building, it wouldn't as bad, since he owns those buildings. It's technically destruction of his own property.
/r/MensRights04/08/16 02:10 PM
4

There's something strange, in this election. Who you gonna vote? DONALD TRUMP! There's something weird, and it don't look good. Who you gonna vote? DONALD TRUMP! Do da Do da Do da I ain't afraid of no Hillary. If you're seeing things, running through DNC. Who can you vote? DONALD TRUMP! An invisible man, rigging your newspaper, YAW Who can you vote? DONALD TRUMP! Do da Do da Do da I ain't afraid of no Hillary If you're all alone, pick up that ballot And vote, DONALD TRUMP! I ain't afraid of no H…
/r/MensRights04/08/16 02:01 PM
1

This is why exposing Hillary's election fraud against Bernie is important. The more the public is aware, the harder it is for the corrupterment to cover it's tracks after pulling off the dark deeds. I think that Bernie is the unsung hero and martyr of American politics. He forced the corrupterment to play its hand early, and managed to expose the election fraud in the act. Now, part of the public is already aware of what happened, and we are prepared to catch it again if they ever chose to do so…
/r/MensRights04/08/16 01:52 PM
2

Guess the prisons are filled to the brim with men. Can't have room for one-and-half more woman.
/r/MensRights30/07/16 01:37 AM
2

Exactly. Saying yes when you're drunk is similar to saying yes to gambling when you're drunk. Casinos make a lot of money off this very tactic. And it's in the most part legal. Imagine if she bought a lottery ticket while drunk, and then after she won, her ticket was invalidated because she had been drinking on the night of the purchase. How would that make her feel?
/r/MensRights29/07/16 07:41 PM
2

That's so true. Incoming rant: I guess it's true that no matter how you spin even the most successful female stories, you can make it seem like the woman was missing out. Things like Taylor Swift or Ronda Rousey being oppressed by the wage gap or Angela Merkel being restricted in her role because she is a woman. These distortion of realities with women's lives follow two patterns: that things would be much better if she wasn't a woman, and that men always choose and enjoy what they do while wome…
/r/MensRights29/07/16 07:24 PM
23

Not only what you said is true, but it's very possible that the "man who impregnate women and then deny responsibility" isn't a responsibility dodger. Think about it, the woman can EASILY make him take responsibility simply by singling him out as the father. But the woman is the one hiding the truth because she is compliant or in control of the situation. It's likely the biological father is unable to take responsibility due the woman manipulating him or threatening him. Here's a potential scena…
/r/MensRights29/07/16 02:47 PM
2

Then, men should have reduced fares, and women should have an extra "seat tax" slapped on their bill. It's only fair to pay for what you use, right?
/r/MensRights29/07/16 02:00 PM
6

If they go down this road, women won't even be allowed to walk for fear of their safety. They'll probably be required to travel with a male companion by law. After all, these regressive idealists don't want "children" going out into the harsh world on their own without adult supervision, right? Of course, even today, women are screaming for independence and claiming that they are equally capable as men. Meanwhile, when some of them encounter problems that only result from lack of "special protec…
/r/MensRights29/07/16 01:46 PM
2

Poor Mandi, having to forever live with the knowledge that she ruined the life of an innocent man, and wasted potentially millions of dollars, depending on the length of the jail sentence and the absence of the potential tax revenue Mr. Ururyar could have contributed in his lifetime. These millions could have been used to save real rape victims and people in critical need. Indirectly, Mandi might have sent 5 thousand people to their deaths. Also, Mandi might have created a situation where more r…
/r/MensRights28/07/16 02:00 PM
3

Although I wouldn't mind getting married to a MRA as wise as someone like GirlWritesWhat. But people like her are the exception and not the rule.
/r/MensRights28/07/16 01:46 PM
7

Before I was banned from /r/askfeminists, I chipped into a discussion about how women were forced by default to care for children, therefore we need feminism. I pointed out that the tender years doctrine was perhaps one of the biggest reasons why women were child-carers by default, and that it was set in place by a feminist. Some people believe feminism is the cure when in fact it was the plague that you are looking a cure for. It reminds me of countries where the government is so big and corrup…
/r/MensRights28/07/16 01:35 PM
4

I think that men must now take extra precautionary measures against these days of feminism madness. It's not fair for men, at all. But we must do what we can until things get better. I say that we should do our best to avoid dating anybody who isn't a proven and tried egalitarian or MRA. Ignorance isn't an excuse anymore in a culture that is literally a minefield for men in all aspects of life. Also, no matter how many times a woman gropes you, don't give in. Especially when she's drunk. Drunk s…
/r/MensRights27/07/16 01:50 PM
14

8 out of 8? Not bad, but feminists know they can do better and progress even more. Perhaps aim for 10 out of 8 next year. Also 0 out of 8 seems like way too many men, as it always is. We should try to aim for -2 out of 8 next year, and keep decreasing yearly for, say, eternity. Remember folks, equality isn't only about balancing numbers. It's about disregarding math and logic, and going one direction towards one extreme and never stopping, even if you hit 100%. /s
/r/MensRights26/07/16 10:28 PM
3

Judge: When someone takes control of you and pushes their penis into your mouth, what can you do? Umm... this? or this? I don't know if people know this little secret, but smart guys, such as PhD students, don't USUALLY put their penis in the mouth of someone they don't trust. You'll have to be Boggs to be stupid enough to think you have control over your rape victim this way: From a the movie "The Shawshank Redemption": Boggs: Now, I'm gonna open my fly and you're gonna swallow what I give ya t…
/r/MensRights26/07/16 07:14 PM
2

If you take a look at the accuser's testimony, she kept repeating that she was confused, but still followed him. It was clear that she didn't know exactly what happened. For example, she just kept saying that "he was so angry, talk so bad, so angry, never seen anything like it, don't know him anymore" but still pressured him to take her home, then sat on his bed?! In fact, if anything, she should be charged with sexual assault: Q. Okay. Now, you had testified that, yesterday, that Mr. Ururyar ha…
/r/MensRights26/07/16 06:31 PM
21

You might also know about her “unfair” practices against the Bernie Sanders campaign Real subtle quotation marks on the word "unfair". Women in power are at a clear disadvantage in the media Right, because every woman in power is heavily criticized for stuff they didn't do. Oh wait. Funny how they use Donald Trump as the main example of how men can get away with saying stuff, when Trump is perhaps the most criticized person in the USA. Perhaps currently even more criticized than Kim Jong Un.
/r/MensRights25/07/16 07:37 PM
4

http://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/rape-and-gender--can-a-woman-rape-a-man.html While a minority of states still use the traditional definition of rape, most have amended their rape laws to make them gender neutral...Further, in states that do not recognize female-male rape, the unwanted sexual touching can still be classified as assault or sexual abuse. You can view the definition of rape for each state here: https://apps.rainn.org/policy/ GEORGIA Rape Definition (no protection for m…
/r/MensRights25/07/16 02:08 PM
23

This heart-breaking story is a pretty good summary of what's wrong with male gender equality. Expectations to do the hardest and most dangerous jobs. No respect of sexual agency Always expect the man to pay for everything, including someone else's stuff No damn given for a man's mental condition or well-being Laughable parental rights Legal system hates men If I had the say in what should happen, the friends who kept silent about the rape deserve to be fined or even charged as criminals. Nobody …
/r/MensRights25/07/16 01:29 PM
2

You know it's trouble when people specifically mention straight cis men, then talk about these singled out individuals in a critical light. It pains me to see that such a large movement about Black problems has failed to identify the elephant in the room.
/r/MensRights23/07/16 01:45 AM
1

This is a common pattern of feminism. Women's feelings are more important than the truth. Even worse is that sometimes I feel that the truth is not only unimportant, it's unwanted. Sometimes, I wonder if today's average feminist feel if the truth even has any value anymore in 2016. Should people even care to find out what is real? Should finding out the truth even change the outcome? If we give into prioritizing feels over truth, we might end up with a court system where the person you like bett…
/r/MensRights20/07/16 09:17 PM
6

I wonder if after this article if feminists will dare complain that female criminal mobsters should have equal global average earnings to male criminal mobsters. Female feminist criminal: Boss, how come male criminals earn, on average, more than us? Crime OverlordBoss: Well, my men tend to kill 10 times more people, rob more banks, put themselves more at risk, and spend more time committing crime than my women. Female feminist criminal: But it's the same work! Men work harder to commit crimes, b…
/r/MensRights16/07/16 02:35 PM
2

I think you got banned for this post? I'm actually super tiny as a male so I get the physical threat aspect. Happens everytime when I go near a group of white men. But I don't see what's wrong with being treated like meat. If one's attractiveness is causing problems (catcalling), aren't there ways to make one less attractive? Imo, it must have been the: But I don't see what's wrong with being treated like meat. or aren't there ways to make one less attractive? Feminists probably go crazy over th…
/r/MensRights13/07/16 10:28 PM
0

I appreciate the concern, but that's okay. I'm not one of those people who shy away from paying the price for my actions. I'll take responsibility for breaking reddit's rules, if they ever bring that issue up. I have plenty of outlets, and most of my time in the internet isn't spent discussing about feminism anyways. I have Youtube and Yahoo Answers, among other sites. The only thing I'll miss is you guys <3 I also have a flexible IP, which is the default behaviour from my ISP.
/r/MensRights13/07/16 10:24 PM
0

I got banned about 8 times from /r/AskFeminists. Despite me following all the rules, being respectful, and providing ample sources, they couldn't find any reason to ban me so they made up reasons. /u/TrulyStupidNewb = Banned for saying that Christina Hoff Sommers was a feminist. /u/TrulyStupidNab = Banned for saying that I was previously banned. /u/TrulyStupidNoob = Banned for this snippet from a larger post: "Specifically, I seriously encourage everyone who is interested in trashing MRM to take…
/r/MensRights13/07/16 10:13 PM
3

I live in Canada. We do have some nice people here, including Karen Straughan and Stefan Molyneux.
/r/MensRights13/07/16 09:07 PM
3

If any prime minister of any country is willing to consistently provide statistically accurate facts on inequality, then I'll take that. Not saying that I support her, but hopefully we can show our support somehow towards her statement about white boys. We can protest the things we disagree with. Like every other politician.
/r/MensRights13/07/16 08:56 PM
18

20 years if this isn't stopped? Imagine a world where a man gets arrested and put in prison for ordering a small diet coke, because the woman behind the counter didn't appreciate the man preferring diet products which might lead to fat shaming, and decided to report his advance to the counter and words as causing discomfort and distress. Gotta keep the woman safe from unrealistic self-expectations. /s
/r/MensRights13/07/16 08:20 PM
16

We know that ignoring harassment and sexist bullying creates the impression that other types of violence against women will be tolerated so we welcome any action which counters this. If this keeps going on, we can no longer legally criticize UK female politicians or protest against them for fear of being arrested for making them feel unsafe or because of disagreeing because she's a woman. use of mobile phones to send unwanted or uninvited messages Guess it's now illegal to break up a relationshi…
/r/MensRights13/07/16 08:15 PM
26

I agree that it's bullshit. To be specific, the divorce proceedings base alimony on the dependent spouse's current lifestyle. The financially productive person's lifestyle doesn't matter.
/r/MensRights13/07/16 07:15 PM
2

While some people eventually grow up to become skeptical of what they are told and learn to think and verify for themselves, one of the most dangerous things of feminism brainwashing is that they tell us that white privilege is invisible, cannot be detected, and cannot be measured. This means that it's impossible to verify, and that anything in the world can be interpreted as the manifestation of white privilege. The concept of white privilege, being undetectable, makes it immune to criticism to…
/r/MensRights13/07/16 03:33 AM
2

Oh wow, just reading the comments makes me think "why all the hate on whiteness?" I decided to throw a little white supremacy speech to even things out (I'm not Caucasian). As a disclaimer, I know that non-white dudes also died in pursuit of liberty. But for some reason, the white freedom martyr seemed to count more towards global progress on average. My comment: The first reason why whites have white privilege is because they invented better ways to travel, and better ways to kill people. In th…
/r/MensRights13/07/16 02:58 AM
8

According to the documentary "divorce corp", the system tries on purpose to make things as long, difficult, and costly as possible in order to maximize profit. Cancelling your court date could mean less money for the system, and it runs contrary to their interest. The system might be feeding your ex wife's hostility towards you. I bet they have a scientifically fine-tuned system to get women to abandon reason and just turn into a rabid bullet dead set on taking you down, even if it costs her all…
/r/MensRights12/07/16 07:14 PM
1

You're right. I went over the top. I won't edit my original post for the sake of context of your post, but I take back most of what I said. The man is guilty if he knew about a murder and was silent about it. Similarly, there are many better decisions the man should have taken. Here are just some of a few: Don't stick your dick in crazy Be responsible about sex and child planning Convince your partner to use the child haven if things seem hopeless Don't treat murder as the morally superior alter…
/r/MensRights12/07/16 03:50 PM
7

Statistically women who kill their children are most often mentally ill. But sometimes I wonder if this statistic is such because they are actually ill, or if people force the "mentally ill" excuse on these women in order to pardon them. If you are the man in the story from /u/perplexedm, and you know that the mother of your children is a potential murderer, how would you react? If you say that reporting her is the right thing, think again. Nobody will believe you, and they will charge you inste…
/r/MensRights12/07/16 01:51 PM
6

I always thought of making a new movement called "Native and Aboriginal People of America Lives Matter" hashtag #NAPALM I just like the acronym.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 08:09 PM
2

I bet if she took the time painting herself and screening "applicants", and used that time to paint her new place instead, she can get it done alone. If she paints it herself, she'll also get the benefit of self-empowerment, confidence, experience, satisfaction, being able to control the quality of the paint application, exercise, and feeling good knowing she didn't use people like objects. I find it pathetic how she mentioned "pretty girl" twice. Also, LMAO at the "guy friend" and a big red fla…
/r/MensRights11/07/16 07:58 PM
17

Advocates have called for a change in the law and better police and legal training to ensure the real perpetrators are punished. Translation: The man should be punished. On this occasion they had been drinking Drinking can cause problems besides rape. I hope people can realize this. "She got up, he chased her around the house and outside ... they ended up on the street and basically she saw a knife on the road, picked it up and stabbed him in the shoulder." The woman, who cannot be identified, s…
/r/MensRights10/07/16 09:47 PM
12

Welcome to 2016, where stating reasonable advice based on statistical facts is problematic. Because surely no sane, politically engaged (columnist, woman, human) in 2016 thinks those things anymore, right? Right? ...Right? Ah, the famous "it's the current year" excuse. A very strong concluding argument indeed. It's like, if we rewound time back a few hundred years, it would become perfectly fine to buy slaves, hate blacks, and kill gays. Because it's 1820. /s It's weird when people say that "peo…
/r/MensRights10/07/16 06:48 PM
36

After the incident, she opened a domestic abuse organization for woman and children. She plugged in the organization later in the show. She specifically mentioned women and children. The saddest thing about this story for me, is that not only does the majority of society not recognize abuse on men, but even if the abuse is plain as day and nobody can deny it, they find it funny and laughable. Something to joke about. Gold comedy. It's like "men don't get abused, but when they do, it's fantastic …
/r/MensRights09/07/16 07:37 PM
1

Some people who have met Adolf Hitler said he was a charming man.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 04:21 PM
12

Finally, somebody who gives Swedish men the respect they deserve. This "teach men not to rape" thing is stupid because it assumes that Swedish men are ignorant about rape. Now, all they have to do now is change "teach men not to rape" to "teach migrants not to rape" and then let the chaos ensue. Or, stop telling men not to rape as if we didn't know already. To be fair, some migrants have very conflicting ideas about rape due to culture conflict. Rape might not be as taboo in their culture than o…
/r/MensRights08/07/16 12:39 PM
3

I believe that Zoe misinterpreted Cathy Young's position. Zoe seems to believe that Cathy believes that we should not criticize any man. I do not think that is what Cathy Young is calling for. We should be able to criticize who we want. This is our right. But just because its legal doesn't mean its productive or morally correct. I think that what Cathy Young is against isn't criticism. It's bullying. The line between criticism and bullying can be blurry. According to Wikipedia: Bullying is the u…
/r/MensRights07/07/16 10:06 PM
6

I wouldn't be surprised if her best friend becomes a domestic abuser. I wonder how many people she's punched already.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 09:37 PM
1

“People don’t call it ‘prostitution’ anymore,” says Caitlin, 20, a college student in Montreal. “That sounds like slut-shaming. Some girls get very rigid about it, like ‘This is a woman’s choice.’ ” Funny, I live in Montreal. I don't know any Caitlin in their 20's, but you never know... She is saying that prostitutes don't want to be called prostitutes anymore because of how tainted the term is. Yet, the nature of their business is identical to prostitution. Hey, that gives me an idea. Why don't…
/r/MensRights07/07/16 09:25 PM
2

You're absolutely right. I am taking full responsibility for what happens to me by staying in the relationship. I learned from feminists what not to do, which is to blame other people for the results for their own choices. I've talked like adults with my girlfriend about our situation. We communicate pretty well and we never argued once. So after spilling the beans, I guess I better explain my situation better in case people get the wrong image about my girlfriend. My girlfriend is a bigger anti…
/r/MensRights05/07/16 02:30 PM
4

Same here. I do all the shopping (my girlfriend hasn't stepped once into a grocery store for 10 month), carry the supplies home, cook (my girlfriend hasn't made me a sandwich or anything else in 8 months), and wash dishes. I work full time, pay her college debt, and take out the garbage. She doesn't have a degree and isn't working. We also have no kids and don't ever plan to have kids. Then I also have to pay for a pet ($1k a year), and I'm not a pet person. To be fair, she does the dishes once …
/r/MensRights05/07/16 04:50 AM
1

Agreed. Also, I'm sure a lot of feminists will complain about sexism if we measure productivity when considering pay. For example, men will have an advantage for almost everything strength related. Similarly, Anita Sarkeesian doesn't release a lot of videos, so you can say she lacks productivity AND efficiency, therefore deserves a pay cut from her estimated $400,000 a year. On the other hand, Vee releases a few videos each day, and receives a lot less money than Anita.
/r/MensRights01/07/16 05:33 PM
620

Until white boys prove to me they’re worth more than a faded fuck, I refuse to take these fuckboys seriously anymore. Testing for sexism and racism by swapping the race/gender is so easy with these people. How about if I said "Until black girls prove to me they're worth more than a faded fuck, I refuse to take these fuckgirls seriously anymore." Racism. Check. Sexism. Check. It's so weird when some people analyze their interactions as driven by gender and race, and then not realize that they are…
/r/MensRights01/07/16 01:10 PM
2

I apologize for the confusion. The label of the 2nd hyperlink is actually the graph title of graph #3 on page 4. The graph is called "Chart 3. Median usual weekly earnings of women and men who are full-time wage and salary workers, by race and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity, 2014 annual averages" This graph likely shows the average of the weekly median. The week data is calculated using median. Then all the medians are averaged up for 2014.
/r/MensRights30/06/16 08:55 PM
2

You've got a point. Women buying 91% of new homes sounds unlikely unless it's a particular slice of the housing market that appeals particularly to women. Perhaps there is a distinction between New Homes and Used Homes? I don't know if women tend to buy newly built homes while men tend to buy 2nd hand homes. It would be insightful if there was an experienced real-estate salesman/saleswoman who can give their experience on this matter.
/r/MensRights30/06/16 07:00 PM
3

I totally get where you're coming from. I personally have little problem with women spending money, or people spending money on women. You can spend money on whoever you want. As a personal story, I wish my girlfriend would spend more of my money. I am the sole breadwinner of my household, yet I do all the shopping (including groceries solo twice a week), cooking, washing dishes, etc. Sometimes I wish my girlfriend would buy the stuff we need, so I don't have to walk 1 kilometer with 10 pound ba…
/r/MensRights30/06/16 06:47 PM
2

Arnold’s Women’s Insight Team Reference to Arnold's Women's Insight Team in 2003 book It's a 1000 respondent study from 2002. The footnote is hidden unless you buy the book.
/r/MensRights30/06/16 06:25 PM
6

Many feminists claim that both men and women equally and actively perpetuate sexism. So lets start an ad campaign to tell parents to start teaching their daughters to respect women, and see how well that goes. I mean nothing can possible go wrong, because feminists LOVE the idea of respecting women and agree that women don't respect themselves, right?
/r/MensRights29/06/16 05:17 PM
4

Gender differences in the utilization of health care services. CONCLUSIONS: Women have higher medical care service utilization and higher associated charges than men. Sex differences in health care consumption in Sweden: A register-based cross-sectional study. RESULTS: Total per capita cost for health care was 20% higher for women than for men. Time: Women should pay more for health care Women's costs are higher, and they live longer, yet Obamacare will charge men the same for health-insurance p…
/r/MensRights28/06/16 03:32 PM
21

They're just too overrun with emotion. When men and boys ask NOT to see your panties during an exam or while doing something important like lifting explosive chemicals, society flips out, tells men to just "ignore" distractions, and call them sexist and oppressive.
/r/MensRights28/06/16 03:20 PM
46

Energy = (Feels * Privilege)² - microaggressions. Man, I'm getting so good at this.
/r/MensRights28/06/16 03:15 PM
2

I agree. Neonaticide has a relationship with mental illness, drugs, financial instability, and relationship instability. Based on the story itself, the judge deemed that the defendant wasn't mentally ill, although that was her claim. We might never find out for real if she was mentally ill. According to the article, she was in denial about the pregnancy. The denial of pregnancy could also be an indicator of mental illness or trauma, and has an increased risk of neonaticide. There should be enoug…
/r/MensRights28/06/16 12:59 AM
1

Since when do taxi cabs refuse to service black women? She forgot other "micro-aggressions". Including, when women assuming you have an ulterior motive for giving them a ride, when people who call the police when men are taking their daughters for a walk, when people keep a distance because they are afraid of toxic masculinity, or when people expect you to carry the boxes or pay for dinner. But this isn't the oppression Olympics. Yes, people who are rude to you are not very nice. But people in g…
/r/MensRights27/06/16 10:36 PM
11

I love it. Down with political correctness, positive sexism, social engineering, and equal outcome. Yes to meaningful discussion, equality, freedom, and equal opportunity. It's important to have politicians that are aware of the reality of gender issues. It's also important to support these politicians so that more will find the courage to resist pressure from the obnoxious bigoted people.
/r/MensRights27/06/16 10:14 PM
1

Maybe feminists might say that the mother was influenced by the glorification of male violence in movies and video games. Or maybe they will blame it on Trump's influence, and say that Trump is spreading hate and violence to the world with his words.
/r/MensRights27/06/16 09:48 PM
2

I've talked about feminism to men face-to-face, and none of them talked about hitting women. Not at the start of the conversation, nor any point in the discussion. Many of them either start with "women had it hard in the past", "feminism has really helped women.", "I'm not interested in feminism", "I don't know much about feminism.", or "I think women should be equal to men." With all the men I've talked with about feminism, not one identified as a feminist, but none of them were against it as w…
/r/MensRights27/06/16 09:19 PM
15

Both the victim and the aggressor are minors, in this case and as a result lodging complaint has becoming difficult, SSP Kanpur Shalabh Mathur confirmed. Besides the poor grammar, I don't think either of those reasons mentioned are valid reasons. If the perpetrator was an underage boy, they wouldn't even think twice about pressing serious charges, regardless of whether the victim was a minor or not. Even if an underage boy rapist did not cause injuries or bleeding, he would still be in trouble. …
/r/MensRights27/06/16 03:53 PM
9

"A white male actor should never be allowed to complain about anything." Sounds like a recipe for suicide. Notice that she didn't say that white male actors should never complain. She said they should never be ALLOWED to complain. This isn't just suggesting self-restraint. This is suggesting control and enforcement based entirely on skin colour, occupation, and sex.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 10:19 PM
1

Sounds great! At this rate of improvement, we might even get Justin Bieber as vice president. His belieber listeners will go perfectly with Queen Hillary's "listen and believe".
/r/MensRights23/06/16 08:48 PM
2

I know! My mind was blown as well. Also, who could have guessed that men are the primary victims of menstruation and that gay bar owners are the primary victims of the Orlando shooting, due to losing customers.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 07:29 PM
1

Interesting. In the last half year, only one woman made it through the test. More men are weeded out than women. 40 men vs 6 women couldn't make it into the marines. We have to cry and moan about the 6 women. But what about the 40 men? Oh, THEY don't really matter. They have to take their misogynistic asses back into the office cause they should know better to just "man up". Cause all we care about is turning the US army into a $665 billion dollar diversity advertisement rather than actually doi…
/r/MensRights22/06/16 08:42 PM
1

If the victim had been a 18 year old black woman and the defendant a white male cop, I doubt the trial will be the same, even if the victim was on drugs and hiding her hands. Everybody has some biases, but we expect those in power to do their best to at least observe and address their biases. Is it just me, or is it wrong to repeatedly fire tasers into an elderly man who was on drugs and tell them not to move. Heck, if I was on drugs, I might not be able to think clearly. If I was getting tasere…
/r/MensRights22/06/16 07:52 PM
1

As I think about it, being an ambiguously spiritual person can be the ultimate lame excuse for everything in life. Q: What did you lick the porcupine? A: Because I am a spiritual person. Q: Why did you run across the Yankee stadium naked? A: Because I am a spiritual person. Q: Why did you wear socks, toe rings, and sandals at the same time? A: Because I am a spiritual person. Which brings me to the question. Does she believe in karma and vengeful spirits?
/r/MensRights21/06/16 09:18 PM
5

Sweet. I'll overlook the possibility that the sentence might have been shorter if the victim was a boy, and just celebrate for what victories we can obtain. equalityforall
/r/MensRights17/06/16 03:13 PM
8

I love this guy's response. I'll definitely be looking at more of his stuff.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 09:53 PM
26

Every time somebody tries to pull this statistic out, I remind them that 85% of baby killers are women. If men tend to kill fully able adults, women tend to kill helpless infants. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/amelia-dyer-the-woman-who-murdered-300-babies-8507570.html Yes, we should not run from the truth. I accept that most mass-shooters are male. Well-researched and accurate statistics should not be hidden for political purposes, and I'm 100% fine with that. But, when people start…
/r/MensRights16/06/16 03:17 PM
63

Even though the boys were as young as 13 years old, they already understand how dangerous rape threats can be. In fact, rape threats are so dangerous, that they would rather BE RAPED than have to contend with a false rape charge.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 10:11 PM
11

Maybe Amber was like "To make things clear, I don't care shit for the law, your opinion, or anything else for the matter. All I want is as much of my cash cow's money as I can get my paws on. Explaining the law to me is emotional abuse in my book."
/r/MensRights14/06/16 09:21 PM
43

He said if Yaw feels he was “treated unfairly,” he can file a complaint with the Internal Affairs Division. I hope the police department gets fined, the police who were involved gets disciplined, and the IDs of the two women get documented to track them for future crimes.
/r/MensRights13/06/16 02:04 PM
16

I'm not MGTOW either, and I would have been a bit hesitant to take your word for it just 1 hour ago, but this story has scared me poop-less. My world will never be the same again. Thankfully I've never been married yet, nor engaged. The marriage system is broken. This isn't how things are supposed to be. How did it get so messed up?
/r/MensRights10/06/16 03:45 PM
1

Unjust practices sometimes only gets noticed when a woman falls victim to it. For example, in New York, they created thirty-eight new laws regulating labor safety after a fire killed over a hundred people, mostly female workers. Fortunately, men also benefited from the safety regulations. Still, this did not stop men from taking most the workplace fatalities in the next hundred years.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 03:07 PM
5

If the person who wrote this "warning" acknowledges that women can be as prejudiced, perhaps I should start advocating in stopping "harmful prejudices towards men", because then I won't have to get roadblocked arguing the re-definition of words according to SJWs. Feminists don't use the word "prejudice" a lot, nor have they redefined that word for their own mental gymnastics. I would love to switch my vocabulary to see if it has any effect, but I've been banned from /r/askfeminists at least 8 ti…
/r/MensRights07/06/16 02:47 PM
4

You can get into a relationship with a woman who advocates for men's rights. Even if it doesn't eliminate the chances of you getting steamrolled by the system, it could lower the risk. That's what I'm doing right now. Unfortunately, it doesn't eliminate all inequality, because my motivation, education, physical ability, and finances are much stronger than my partner's, which means that I pull most the weight, physically and financially. But it's refreshing to hear her complain to her parents abo…
/r/MensRights07/06/16 02:13 PM
21

She hasn't been married for that long, so it should be easy to return to the old life she was accustomed to. It's like eating at the BACCHANAL buffet at Las Vegas every day during your vacation, then saying that my partner is now obligated by law to pay $150 a day for me for food because I got accustomed to eating like a king and won't settle for anything less. Heck, if there is anything she shouldn't be accustomed to, it's living large. I doubled my income 2 years ago and I"m still living like …
/r/MensRights02/06/16 04:25 PM
2

Women, who constitute slightly more than 50% of population, commit only about 20% of all crime. They commit even a lower portion of all serious crime... Women now comprise 8% of prisoners in the United States and Australia 8% the prisoners for 20% the crime? Even accounting the allegedly lower severity of the crime, I don't think it's clear whether women are over-represented in prison. If anything, it's the other way around. Women almost never scare us; commit random acts of serious violence; vi…
/r/MensRights01/06/16 09:56 PM
9

When we use the ‘nice guy’ defence, we continue to perpetuate the myth that an abuser can only be a nightmarish monster, in spite of overwhelming evidence otherwise. And when we use the "nice girl" defence, like every other case, we continue to perpetuate the myth that some women can't be nightmarish monsters, in spite of overwhelming evidence otherwise. These statistics should force us to confront the ugly truth – domestic abuse is perpetrated by the guy next to you in the coffee queue, the man…
/r/MensRights01/06/16 04:04 PM
1

I guess they support using free speech to silence free speech so much that I'm sure they won't mind if a protest occurs right inside the theater hall at the same time as they are trying to enjoy their Ghostbuster theater screening. "There someone loud, in your neighbourhood. Who you gonna call? NO-BODY! Duh-uh, Duh-uh, I ain't afraid of no speech!" Regressive Liberal: "Can't you shut these people up? I'm trying to enjoy a movie I paid for!" Security Guard: "Sorry. Free speech."
/r/MensRights01/06/16 03:04 PM
13

Seriously, what the fuck did I just read? You just read about a guy who was spared the pain of having to deal with a REAL "cheap ass" for any longer than he chose to. Thank goodness that the only man who valued true equality didn't have to put up with a sexist, manipulative date who can't see past a small piece of paper with "$10" written on it to notice anything about his personality. It's like, women people complain that men are too obsessed about their bodies. But hey, at least your body is p…
/r/MensRights31/05/16 10:30 PM
20

So true. Imagine if a girl who dumped her boyfriend would find herself years later standing in line to get him to sign an autograph.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 10:03 PM
14

That's awful. It sounds like you've been through the wringer. I hope your daughter grows up to appreciate men's rights. The problem is that children do not understand the value of money. To them, money seems to materialize when they need it, and someone will provide for them. To children, if they need money, all they have to do is hound the higher-ups and they will get what they want. In order for people to learn to appreciate money, they need to develop the appreciation by working hard for year…
/r/MensRights31/05/16 09:48 PM
2

"He who fights with monsters should be careful lest he thereby become a monster. And if thou gaze long into an abyss, the abyss will also gaze into thee." I think this is a reminder for everybody to engage in constant self-reflection. Fortunately, we have help from a large movement that provide us with ample examples of what NOT to do.
/r/MensRights27/05/16 04:31 PM
1

Sports is a form of entertainment, so strength isn't everything. If Selena Gomez and Miley Cyrus had a 12 round boxing match, many people won't watch them just because of how strong they are. But rather, they wanna see Miley come in like a wrecking ball (almost guaranteed that it would be her entry song). That being said, what makes me scratch my head is how women demand equal pay for jobs where strength is the primary factor. Such as security guards, warehouse workers, and construction.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 10:10 PM
3

They are somehow saying that if someone is missing or appears forcibly removed from their residence, it's harassment to look for them or to assume that they are taken against their will. If these people were in charge, they could possibly put a halt to all search and rescue missions. Not to mention that they are glorifying kidnappers, cause according to these women, these kidnappers at least know they are monsters, unlike the people who work to save people (who these women assume are entitled ba…
/r/MensRights17/05/16 09:52 PM
2

I can do faulty math too! I can say that this woman Samira Lupidi, link, killed more children than Hitler killed Jewish people. How did I come up with the stats? Well, 100% of the people killed by Samira were children, while not 100% of people who died as an indirect result of Hitler were Jewish. As a result, Samira has a higher % of victims fitting the desired condition. Headline: Samira killed more children in 30 minutes than Hitler killed Jewish people in his entire life.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 09:02 PM
2

Now it starts to make sense why some women are losing their cool over the MGTOW movement.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 01:59 PM
10

I heard rumours that the fish community has reported a critical shortage of bicycles. Can anyone confirm?
/r/MensRights12/05/16 01:53 PM
21

I don't think she wants to play her trump card.
/r/MensRights11/05/16 11:28 PM
4

Look at that picture. He's clearly abusing her with his manspreading. On the other hand, she's abusing him back with her womanhairspreading. So much abuse in one picture. I can't take it! Joke aside, emotional abuse is a serious problem, and I'm sort of glad they brought it up. I believe that many people overlook the number of men and women that suffer from true emotional abuse, because the loudest feminists tend to scream abuse at mere disagreement. I hope we can help everybody identify emotion…
/r/MensRights11/05/16 10:02 PM
2

Why don't you wear some extremely obvious and over-the-top strategic butt covering, and stay silent through the entire conference without asking questions. Your awkward clothing might distract the audience away from Anita's ramblings. If people ask you about the cape/butt covering, tell them that that you don't know what they are talking about.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 09:58 PM
5

As a man, I don't think we have it that bad until we get married. But, lets exaggerate the man-problems for some fun: If men fight back, they are toxic. If they don't fight back, they are wimps. If a man disagrees with a woman, he's sexist. If he agrees with a woman, he is a pussy whipped dog who just wants sex, and is sexist. If he explains or defends his position to a woman, he's mansplaining and sexist. If he doesn't reply a woman, he's ignoring the woman, and is rude and sexist. If a man ope…
/r/MensRights13/11/15 06:51 PM
5

This happened in 2006. The news on this issue disappeared. Some people think that the girls settled the case for an undisclosed amount: Source: https://ca.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130607184651AAmV56p
/r/MensRights13/11/15 06:08 PM
1

No idea if it's a man or woman. Either way, that person is very ban happy. Many feminists also complained about the banning inconsistency.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 03:15 PM
6

I've been banned 5 times by the very same guy in r/AskFeminists. I'm used to it by now. Feminism at its core is way too exclusive for my tastes.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 11:33 PM
2

First time posting on /r/mensrights! I'm a proud supporter of Men's Rights, and my girlfriend is the biggest anti-feminist I know in real life. She reads /r/KotakuInAction for 3 hours a day, and never misses a SargonOfAkkad video. Unlike the OP or my girlfriend, I haven't given up on feminism. I don't call myself a feminist, but I want feminism to reconcile with the MRAs so even if they can't work together, they can at least understand each other more accurately and stop the hate. I got banned f…
/r/MensRights11/09/15 05:41 PM
0

That's not even 10k a year. Not worth it for a doctor to get pregnant just to get 10k a year.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 11:59 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter