No. It doesn't. I don't think either party should ve assumed guilty. It's those asking for this woman to be punished that want someone to be assumed as guilty.
Wrong. No man should be assumed guilty. Just because I don't want to punish the woman without a trial doesn't mean I'm for punishing men without a trial.
No. Men shouldn't be lambasted without a conviction and nor should women. That's not a double standard. Double standard would be shouting this mam is innocent until proven guilty while asking for this girl to be punished without a conviction.
The highest upvoted comment on an article about single men was: "Women now are so entitled that they expect the man to get on his knees, bark and play fetch to keep them entertained." If you want to understand the mens rights movement, picture large groups of men that are angry at the world and blame women and feminism for that anger.
I see. So if a man raped you and you didn't have any evidence, you wouldn't report it? Really? You'd just say awww shucks and move on even though potentially the police could find evidence?
You're right. Lock her up. And if she really was assaulted, we'd just be imprisoning a victim. What a great world that would be. You should be a world leader.
Wow. You're struggling. Being found not guilty does not mean the crime never happened. It means there wasn't enough evidence to convict you of the crime. Just like their isn't enough evidence to convict this woman of lying. Even though evidence doesn't seem to matter to people here when it's a woman on trial.
Sigh. He was not found innocent. He was found not guilty. I never said it wasn't a lie. I said no one knows. But here I am believing in innocent until proven guilty. But I guess you're saying that's only for men.
It wasn't proven it didn't happen. That's not how the justice system works. This shouldn't be so hard for people to inderstand. What was proven was there was not enough evidence to be certain that it happened. Trials don't determine innocence. They determine conclusive guilt.
Right. So charge men anonymously. That will solve the problem. Locking up women without a trial won't. I'm a troll because I'm advocating for innocent until proven guilty and all these people wanting to imprison a woman that may be a victim are the good guys? You have a warped sense of reality.
Exactly. So everyone moves on with their lives and no one but those 2 know the truth. We don't imprison a woman without a trial and assume she's a liar. Yet everyone is doing exactly that.
That's not how the justice system works. The entire jury may think he did it but there wasn't enough evidence to be certain. There is NO reason to believe this was a false report.
There's no evidence she lied though. Just punish her anyway? You realize that's exactly the problem right? Never mind. I guess people want to be exactly like feminists and just convict this woman of a crime without a trial charging her. Smh.
Because people see what they want to see and ignore everything else. It's why MRAs hate feminists when most are perfectly normal people. It's why feminists hate MRAs even though a minority are misogynists. It's why women think men as a whole are problematic and it's why men flock to male subreddits to complain about women. People suck and are mostly trying to prove a point rather than actually accepting Information.
