| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Stalker Wikipedia Admin, KillerChihuahua, had account deleted when I pointed out that emasculating the men's rights wiki, and filling it with Michael Flood content was going to go over like a lead zeppelin. He is also profoundly dishonest.On a page that has already attracted so much bullshit, someone whose first post was something like "The Greater Men's Rights community has been informed that you guys destroyed this page" going on to post "How can you guys even consider using Michael Flood? It'll result in dedicated MRA's viciously stalking you!" would come off as an unproductive threat to any reasonable person. I wouldn't call it a serious real-life threat or anything, but it was clearly intended to be a threat - and you are a … | /r/MensRights | 22/10/11 10:25 PM |
| 0 | Let's keep 'em honest. Wikipedia Men's Rights page has been unblocked for editing, and is being edited by some of the same actors that caused trouble. Make sure to follow wiki-procedure, and enforce it from others.Because Jezebel gets 30 million page views a month, has a staff of writers with editorial oversight, and isn't focused on personally attacking Wikipedia editors. | /r/MensRights | 21/10/11 01:22 AM |
| 1 | Let's keep 'em honest. Wikipedia Men's Rights page has been unblocked for editing, and is being edited by some of the same actors that caused trouble. Make sure to follow wiki-procedure, and enforce it from others.And to be clear: no one thinks the current version of the article is actually good, and the current version of the article will not be in its current form for long. I think most of us would agree that it's pretty horrible. It's just (slightly) more in line with our policies than the original version was. | /r/MensRights | 20/10/11 09:39 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter