TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TsuNaru Archive

View 1 post and 24 comments by TsuNaru on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
49

Activism/SupportTsuNaru/r/MensRights20/09/24 11:29 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I've seen the mendacious HIV studies. I'm reposting, because this bold faced lie needs to be shut down right now. From the NIH: in the Uganda study, out of about 5000 men, 22 circumcised men tested positive vs 45 uncircumcised. The difference between these two small numbers is stated as a 50-60% relative reduction to appear significant. Meanwhile, the number of adverse events (botched circumcision) was 178 men out of the 2474 who were cut. They never mention that part. The number of men whose pe…
/r/MensRights21/02/25 05:00 AM
5

Of course. The most common rebuttal against circumcision is because it takes away one's bodily autonoly, which IS very important... but the average person is too stupid to really understand that. They need to know WHY amputating the foreskin directly INHIBITS functions of the penis. THEN they're able to see why circumcision is actually bad.
/r/MensRights01/10/24 07:21 PM
7

Knowledge. It's frustrating how this answer eludes so many of you. You have to tell people what the foreskin is and how important it is, with studies. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23374102/ Conclusions: "This study confirms the importance of the foreskin for penile sensitivity, overall sexual satisfaction, and penile functioning. Furthermore, this study shows that a higher percentage of circumcised men experience discomfort or pain and unusual sensations as compared with the uncircumcised pop…
/r/MensRights01/10/24 03:44 PM
3

Yes. Especially when you understand the functions of the foreskin.
/r/MensRights29/09/24 02:58 AM
2

Spread like wildfire comrade
/r/MensRights23/09/24 12:30 AM
8

Absolutely. I've been using this copypaste for months now. Always yields decent upvotes and very few people challenge it. Last week it got nearly 4000 upvotes. If anyone tries to counter with those Brian Morris studies, use this to completely debunk him. https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1079164114784714752.html
/r/MensRights20/09/24 11:21 PM
21

Additional Info. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23374102/ Conclusions: "This study confirms the importance of the foreskin for penile sensitivity, overall sexual satisfaction, and penile functioning. Furthermore, this study shows that a higher percentage of circumcised men experience discomfort or pain and unusual sensations as compared with the uncircumcised population." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17378847/ Conclusions: "The glans (tip) of the circumcised penis is less sensitive to fine t…
/r/MensRights20/09/24 01:16 PM
17

That guy who responded is just coping and doesn't know what he's talking about. Here’s one of the key papers discussing the origins of circumcision, the most important quote from the abstract would be: The only point of agreement among proponents of the various theories is that promoting good health had nothing to do with it. In the days before aseptic surgery, any cutting of flesh was the least hygienic thing anybody could do, carrying a high risk of bleeding, infection and death. None of the a…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/24 02:29 AM
1

That's not even a real diagnosis. Your cognitive dissonance is very extreme to say such a thing. This is just like that short story "The Fox Who Lost His Tail". That explains your coping to a T.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 01:01 AM
1

You're trying so hard to live in a bubble. To the objective observer, that's incredibly sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 12:31 AM
1

Yet you respond so angrily and defensively. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23374102/ Conclusions: This study confirms the importance of the foreskin for penile sensitivity, overall sexual satisfaction, and penile functioning. Furthermore, this study shows that a higher percentage of circumcised men experience discomfort or pain and unusual sensations as compared with the uncircumcised population. You lost the fine touch receptors, the stretching receptors, the gliding mechanism which enhances t…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 11:35 PM
0

Yep, that other redditor is in full cope mode. Unless someone is against both forms of mutilation (male and female), then they are part of the problem and why both will not go away.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 09:20 PM
1

You may find this study interesting when people use the ol' "Women who underwent FGM can't orgasm, but men who underwent MGM can so they're not comparable!" card. https://www.guttmacher.org/journals/ipsrh/2003/03/genital-cutting-may-alter-rather-eliminate-womens-sexual-sensations
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 11:21 PM
1

https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/moral-landscapes/201501/circumcision-s-psychological-damage
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 07:36 PM
1

Copying this for later uses.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 06:58 PM
3

Google "Adamant Father Syndrome". It delves into the psychology behind it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 06:46 PM
1

Understandable.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 05:51 PM

Please use these sort of sources to help your case. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23374102/ Conclusions: This study confirms the importance of the foreskin for penile sensitivity, overall sexual satisfaction, and penile functioning. Furthermore, this study shows that a higher percentage of circumcised men experience discomfort or pain and unusual sensations as compared with the uncircumcised population. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36286328/ “Results matched earlier observations made in Sou…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 05:45 PM
2

The foreskin is a rather large, highly sensitive sexual organ with thousands of receptors that respond primarily to fine touch and stretching, which give that very pleasurable ticklish sensation all around the area below the glans (head of the penis). The glans itself has receptors that primarily respond to heat and pressure. Depending on the "style" of circumcision, either all of these erogenous fine touch/stretch receptors are removed (low and tight), or simply many of them are removed (high a…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 05:31 PM
3

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23374102/ Conclusions: This study confirms the importance of the foreskin for penile sensitivity, overall sexual satisfaction, and penile functioning. Furthermore, this study shows that a higher percentage of circumcised men experience discomfort or pain and unusual sensations as compared with the uncircumcised population. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36286328/ “Results matched earlier observations made in South Africa that circumcised and intact men had simila…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 04:55 PM
1

Also, he suffers from what it is called: Adamant Father Syndrome. Do a quick google search. Also, here is some more atudies and resources. www.cirp.org/pages/anatomy www.yourwholebaby.org https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23374102/ Conclusions: This study confirms the importance of the foreskin for penile sensitivity, overall sexual satisfaction, and penile functioning. Furthermore, this study shows that a higher percentage of circumcised men experience discomfort or pain and unusual sensations as…
/r/MensRights28/07/24 06:20 PM
1

Here are some studies to show him that it is not cleaner. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36286328/ “Results matched earlier observations made in South Africa that circumcised and intact men had similar levels of HIV infection. The study questions the current strategy of large scale VMMC campaigns to control the HIV epidemic. These campaigns also raise a number of ethical issues.“ https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10654-021-00809-6 “In this national cohort study spanning more than three…
/r/MensRights28/07/24 06:18 PM
4

The foreskin is a rather large, highly sensitive sexual organ with thousands of receptors that respond primarily to fine touch and stretching, which give that very pleasurable ticklish sensation all around the area below the glans (head of the penis). The glans itself has receptors that primarily respond to heat and pressure. Depending on the "style" of circumcision, either all of these erogenous fine touch/stretch receptors are removed (low and tight), or simply many of them are removed (high a…
/r/MensRights23/07/24 02:26 AM
1

penile cancer Not only that, but amputation as a form of preventative care is pants on head... Take breast cancer, a significantly more common cancer, we don't remove breasts of girls as a way to prevent it. Same for penile cancer. Using that argument as a pro for circumcision is very very weird and illogical.
/r/MensRights19/07/24 12:48 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter