~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | Female protester claims a man touched her breasts, and then punches the man. Man knows how to use pepper spray to tame the wild bitchYou can see her clench and unclench her fist a couple times long before she swings. He knew it was coming. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 26/03/20 11:01 PM |
| 2 | Australian court prohibits man accused of rape of introducing evidence that his accuser has made 12 previous false accusationsDeleted. I gotta learn to read. Sorry. | /r/MensRights | 27/12/19 01:52 AM |
| 1 | Gender pay gap in modelling sees men paid 75% less than womenIt doesn't work that way, the number of grandparents remains constant. Someone doesn't have more or fewer grandparents just because they have more or fewer children. This was my original statement. I agree wholeheartedly with you on this. How do you get “more female ancestors than male”? In your sample, the generation has 60 different fathers, 80 different mothers? This also means 80 different maternal grandfathers and 60 different paternal grandmothers. If you reduce the influence of one gender… | /r/MensRights | 10/02/18 12:18 PM |
| 1 | Gender pay gap in modelling sees men paid 75% less than womenAbsolutely, you are correct when considering a single generation. I can accept that. But my issue arises when you carry it back a generation. In our perfect example, for instance, there is a reduction in maternal grandmothers as well as fathers. | /r/MensRights | 09/02/18 11:43 PM |
| 1 | Gender pay gap in modelling sees men paid 75% less than womenThanks for the source. My point is though, that when each person reproduces, they in turn have ancestors that would be represented. If a smaller number of men reproduce, and have greater representation, then their female ancestors are represented simply because their male descendant is. | /r/MensRights | 09/02/18 12:30 PM |
| 1 | Gender pay gap in modelling sees men paid 75% less than womenBut this doesn’t change the proportion of your ancestors though. You still have two male grandparents and two female grandparents. And four of each for great grandparents. The number of partners each has and the number of offspring is irrelevant. | /r/MensRights | 09/02/18 06:03 AM |
| 1 | Gender pay gap in modelling sees men paid 75% less than womenBut if you’re talking in terms of ancestors, it doesn’t work that way. Each generation has two parents, and so you’d have equal numbers of each, I.e. two grandparents of each gender, four great grandparents of each gender and so forth. The proportion of each gender that does or does not reproduce and the number of offspring each has does not matter. | /r/MensRights | 09/02/18 06:01 AM |
| 1 | Gender pay gap in modelling sees men paid 75% less than women...”two times the number of female ancestors as male ancestors “ Could you explain how this works? | /r/MensRights | 08/02/18 11:43 PM |
| 60 | Feminist version of equality.She also flies the Millenium Falcon better than Han Solo, and fixes it better than Chewbacca. | /r/MensRights | 31/05/17 11:45 PM |
| 2 | After yesterdays article about cracked.coms feminist leaning they post thisNo mention of Far Cry 3? The main character (a man) is drugged and raped by a woman. A secondary character is raped on a daily basis until you save him. Apparently the game is about white colonialism.... :-/ | /r/MensRights | 20/09/13 08:33 AM |
| 1 | Looking for information on male depression. Came across this. SighHang in there, mate. | /r/MensRights | 21/05/13 02:39 PM |
| 1 | Sperm and cheap manual labourFunny, I was reading about this today. Franklin apparently had X-ray crystallography data that showed DNA had a double helix structure, but a) wouldn't share her findings, even with her coworkers and b) spread disinformation to the contrary. Eventually, her coworker and competitors got a hold of her data, made some huge breakthroughs and eventually Crick and Watson received a Nobel prize (more on that later.) Crick and Watson had already done considerable work at this stage, and there was sugges… | /r/MensRights | 27/02/13 09:49 AM |
| 4 | "Men Only ≠ Women Only. It is a red herring and a disgraceful suggestion to make." (said by a man)"Assuming a 50/50 split for gender" Thanks for the laugh! :-D | /r/MensRights | 19/11/12 08:43 AM |
| 1 | a funny post from /r/4chan"I don't think you're qualified to decide what is suitably technical" I wasn't "deciding", I was discussing, suggesting, even. With someone who appeared to be in agreement "...and I'd appreciate it if you dropped the condescending smileys." Actually, to be honest, my entire intention with these past couple replies has been to bounce ideas off a like-minded individual. The smilies were my way of showing you that I was trying to keep things genial. If you've got no intention of doing the same, the… | /r/MensRights | 20/10/12 07:00 AM |
| 1 | a funny post from /r/4chanOkay, point made, but "male-gendered" or "male-identifying" is no less unwieldy, is suitably technical and pretty intuitive. Ironically, using cis/trans is less inclusive! :-) | /r/MensRights | 20/10/12 12:53 AM |
| 1 | a funny post from /r/4chanAhh, I see. Absolutely. Heterosexual, perhaps?? :-) | /r/MensRights | 19/10/12 05:28 PM |
| 7 | a funny post from /r/4chanOh, I get that. And I'm in agreement with you. But I would argue that it's ridiculous under any circumstance. The terms we would use normally are just fine, provided there's no implied inferiority to being a "trans" person, whether that implies transsexual or gay. What the problem is appears to be deliberate smokescreen tactics, or a bad case of the pejorative treadmill. As some delicious irony, look into the history of the word "gay" sometime :-) | /r/MensRights | 19/10/12 04:57 PM |
| 37 | a funny post from /r/4chanBut "straight" is such an easier term to use. I hate the innate obscurity and awkwardness of cis/trans. To me, it smacks of feminists making up a new word for the sake of it, simply so they can feel smug and superior when you have to ask what the hell it means. To me it just feels like an attempt to control discussion by controlling language. | /r/MensRights | 19/10/12 09:22 AM |
| 1 | Whoopi Goldberg on woman's spitting and assault of Cleveland bus driver: "Women have this idea that you can hit and punch on a man .. and it's ok and he's not going to hit you back. Those days are gone".Thought so, and it comes from a military source so not quite surprised. Thanks for the lesson in civil obedience :-) | /r/MensRights | 16/10/12 02:43 PM |
| 1 | Whoopi Goldberg on woman's spitting and assault of Cleveland bus driver: "Women have this idea that you can hit and punch on a man .. and it's ok and he's not going to hit you back. Those days are gone".No, absolutely, I didn't read it as that. But if I'm faced with armed riot police, isn't exercising my right to peacefully protest by definition "passive resistance?" | /r/MensRights | 16/10/12 02:30 PM |
| 3 | Whoopi Goldberg on woman's spitting and assault of Cleveland bus driver: "Women have this idea that you can hit and punch on a man .. and it's ok and he's not going to hit you back. Those days are gone".Wait.... passive resistance requires pain compliance or a chemical agent? Am I reading this right??? | /r/MensRights | 16/10/12 01:06 PM |
| 1 | Equality...feminist style.I would say probably close to 80% of the places I go to have a changing area in the men's room. This is in New England though, we're fairly progressive around here. Good to hear! Where I am (Western Australia), it's generally male toilet, female, disabled. Change tables'll generally be in either disabled or female toilets. There's a parenting room in the larger malls, but it's not uncommon to see them signposted as "mothers' rooms" | /r/MensRights | 03/10/12 02:38 PM |
| 3 | Equality...feminist style.I would love to see change tables in male toilets as standard. Apparently, it's all the go in Scandinavian countries. | /r/MensRights | 03/10/12 12:39 PM |
| 2 | Feminists demand the right to show off their bodies, whilst simultaneously condemning men for looking at them.That's a shame. Hyperbole is literally the best thing ever! | /r/MensRights | 25/09/12 07:12 AM |
| 2 | Child Support (X-Post from r/facepalm)I don't think you should be getting downvotes for this. But then, I don't think you're the same sort of person as the person in that photo. :-) | /r/MensRights | 21/09/12 12:04 PM |
| 1 | I get these type of text messages all the time. I'm sure a lot of you guys can relate. (Needless to say, I had to resist and I didn't reply)Or just "k". Vowels cost money, y'know. :-) | /r/MensRights | 21/09/12 10:17 AM |
| 0 | Privilege denying dude.It's a shame. I used to agree with 100% of what they posted, and they always had something new and cool. | /r/MensRights | 18/09/12 07:25 AM |
| 11 | Ask eddit thread about men who have been raped by women.It's an involuntary physical reaction. Ask any teenage boy. | /r/MensRights | 18/06/12 03:16 PM |
| 5 | F* everything about this. This was on the message board of a church I walked past today. I am very insulted.You know, I was totally cheesed off by the OP's picture, but you've convinced me. If we do our jobs as Dads right, and we get some joy from the whole business, shit like this shouldn't matter. | /r/MensRights | 17/06/12 10:20 AM |
| 5 | Female Privilege.Is this the "Unknown History of Misandry?" http://unknownmisandry.blogspot.com.au/ | /r/MensRights | 28/05/12 12:21 PM |
| 1 | False accusation on the Simpsons.In this episode, it is strongly suggested that Homer is raped by a male panda. | /r/MensRights | 08/05/12 09:37 AM |
| 2 | I'm a girl and...The etiquette seems to be this: Holding doors open is a nice thing to do. Everyone is either a door-opener, or a non-door opener. That is to say, either you hold the door for others, or you don't, or perhaps, others hold the door for you. You probably know which you are. If you are a door-opener, when a door is opened for you, just touch the door with your hand as you go through. No need to hold the door, just a brush of the hand is sufficient. If you are a non-door opener, say "thanks" This isn… | /r/MensRights | 27/04/12 02:59 PM |
| 1 | Warrant issued for man's arrest for dipping out on bad date and her leeching tag-a-longs who expected him to payProbably right, but in this case, they've got three ladies on one side, who'll swear blind that he did, and a dude who they can't reach. I'm hoping you're right and they get a judge with some common sense, who'll throw the whole thing out. | /r/MensRights | 17/04/12 04:45 PM |
| 1 | Warrant issued for man's arrest for dipping out on bad date and her leeching tag-a-longs who expected him to payI think you're right. Police charged Daniel J. Robinson, 23, of Sheffield Village, with theft saying he promised to pay for the three guests meals at Champps Americana in Crocker Park. He then stepped out for a phone call and never returned, leaving his date with the bill and “no means to pay,” Westlake police said. Three guests = his "date" plus two others. So the guy's in trouble for the money the ladies owe, it would seem. | /r/MensRights | 17/04/12 04:21 PM |
| 1 | Warrant issued for man's arrest for dipping out on bad date and her leeching tag-a-longs who expected him to payThe "No separate billing" clause is used so that a restaurant doesn't have to deal with people's arguments, or so that the last person out doesn't get the rough end of the stick. There is nothing wrong with paying at the table. If it can be proven that a diner had no intention of paying, or had no means of paying and was aware of this, then it can be seen as breach of contract, or criminal fraud. Again, your mileage may vary, but where I live, this is the case. The diner needs to be able to prov… | /r/MensRights | 17/04/12 11:04 AM |
| 1 | Warrant issued for man's arrest for dipping out on bad date and her leeching tag-a-longs who expected him to payNo, but contract law is law. Intending not to pay can be seen as criminal fraud. I can imagine a reasonable proprietor will take all sorts of measures to make sure he doesn't have to go to court over something minor as this, but if it is clearly displayed that a place of business does not or maybe cannot accept a certain kind of payment, well that's their right. | /r/MensRights | 17/04/12 10:17 AM |
| 1 | Warrant issued for man's arrest for dipping out on bad date and her leeching tag-a-longs who expected him to payIf store policy is clearly displayed where a patron can see it, prior to ordering then the customer doesn't really have much of a comeback. What if the customer insisted on paying with a credit card, where it wasn't accepted. There are legally protected situations where payment can be refused. Also, I don't think it'd be "theft" per se, but something else. Note that I haven't used the word "theft" in any of my comments so far. Also, please note that I am talking about restaurant policies in gene… | /r/MensRights | 17/04/12 09:50 AM |
| -1 | Warrant issued for man's arrest for dipping out on bad date and her leeching tag-a-longs who expected him to payEvery restaurant I've been in has a sign up front, saying "No separate billing." I've never seen it used outside of that context, so that point is sorta moot. I've never worked in a restaurant, so I can't speak for what happens when people don't / won't pay. One can only assume... | /r/MensRights | 17/04/12 09:33 AM |
| 1 | Warrant issued for man's arrest for dipping out on bad date and her leeching tag-a-longs who expected him to payFor the record, I live in Australia, not the US. Your mileage may vary. What I mean is, they will refuse to take part payment for a group booking. You can't pay "Your part of the bill". The money for a meal is collected from the table as a whole. If you tried to pay for one part, they would refuse. If there was not enough money forthcoming, they would deal with it in the same way as non-payment, which I would assume is calling the police. | /r/MensRights | 17/04/12 09:22 AM |
| 2 | Warrant issued for man's arrest for dipping out on bad date and her leeching tag-a-longs who expected him to payMe too, but a lot of restaurants have a "no separate billing" clause. Either everything gets paid for, or they call the cops. | /r/MensRights | 17/04/12 05:27 AM |
| 3 | Growing up with a feminist mother...By WW1, in the age of the suffragettes, most men did not have the vote in Britain. Sorry to butt in, but could you explain this a bit further, for a non-history guy? | /r/MensRights | 12/04/12 01:50 PM |
| 11 | Modern Men Are Trained To Hate WomenI dunno, they're still a good read, which is partly why I found this so frustrating. | /r/MensRights | 27/03/12 02:57 PM |
| 3 | Feminist myths about a misogyny-based "wage gap" debunked for the 50,000th time.I am skeptical of a wage gap for these reasons: First, no-one has ever explained the reasoning behind the figures. Not until now have I had a decent explanation. Secondly, men are usually judged based solely on their ability to earn money. It makes sense to me that a man would be more motivated to earn. Thirdly, wow 17% earning gap? Try a 17% life expectancy gap sometime. | /r/MensRights | 27/03/12 05:27 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter