| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Parent > Visitor. Socially Sanctioned Negation In A Nut Shell.No, it isn't. But sure thing, buddy. | /r/MensRights | 20/09/17 04:31 PM |
| 1 | Parent > Visitor. Socially Sanctioned Negation In A Nut Shell.That is my argument, but thanks. | /r/MensRights | 20/09/17 03:22 PM |
| 1 | Parent > Visitor. Socially Sanctioned Negation In A Nut Shell.No, it isn't. Nor were the comments he pointed out even really a contradiction. As I said, visitation is not the same as having partial custody. Uprooting your kids all the time is damaging to the kids, which is why typically, if one parent doesn't live in the same area, they get alternating weekends and holidays. Is it perfect? No. Is it exclusively to the detriment of men? Used to be, but not nearly as much these days. Meanwhile, you can just scroll up for my particular example, which is more … | /r/MensRights | 20/09/17 11:41 AM |
| 1 | Parent > Visitor. Socially Sanctioned Negation In A Nut Shell.Ah, yes. You found one example of a minor contradiction! Whole argument is invalid, ignore the rest of it. Congratulations, you beat the Internet Boss(tm). | /r/MensRights | 20/09/17 06:37 AM |
| 1 | Parent > Visitor. Socially Sanctioned Negation In A Nut Shell.No, my point was that it's incredibly rare to have a judge go "Ah, yes. There doesn't seem tonbe anything wrong with you as a father...very well, you can only visit your children once a month, good day." | /r/MensRights | 20/09/17 01:21 AM |
| 1 | Parent > Visitor. Socially Sanctioned Negation In A Nut Shell.One of the frustrating parts of reddit in general, I guess. | /r/MensRights | 19/09/17 09:21 PM |
| -2 | Parent > Visitor. Socially Sanctioned Negation In A Nut Shell.Yes, but as has been stated elsewhere, equal parental rights is not always practical nor advisable. In my own example, my dad was a flight risk. That's why visitation was supervised; the court didn't trust him alone with me or my sister. In other, less extreme examples, you have men--and indeed, sometimes women--who simply can't be in the right place to make the childs life easily suited to switching back and forth easily. | /r/MensRights | 19/09/17 09:20 PM |
| -7 | Parent > Visitor. Socially Sanctioned Negation In A Nut Shell.And potentially my sister and me, too. It's funny that someone in another thread referred to other subs as "echo chambers", the implication there being that this one isn't. | /r/MensRights | 19/09/17 09:04 PM |
| -7 | Parent > Visitor. Socially Sanctioned Negation In A Nut Shell.Eh. Visitation is typically brought about because one party or another -did- do something wrong. I'm sure people will argue that the majority of men going through divorce are only granted visitation, but in most of the cases I've seen personally, the parents tend to have joint custody. Sure, one parent might only get weekends or something, but that's not quite the same as visitation. For instance, custody of myself and my younger sister was given to my mother when we were aged 4 and 3, respectiv… | /r/MensRights | 19/09/17 07:55 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter