TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Tusse Archive

View 0 posts and 441 comments by Tusse on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

And then older guys wonder why they get cuckolded by their young wives and eventually taken to the cleaners in the divorce court. It's a funny old world...
/r/MensRights04/07/15 07:56 PM
2

See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paragraph_175 TL;DR: Nazis were somewhat involved, but, the law is a lot older than than that. For balance see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernst_R%C3%B6hm Maybe in general, this is a topic that is kind of best avoided, if it was simple to explain it would have been explained simply long ago.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 10:22 PM
1

1) Sounds like a law suit waiting to happen. Also sounds like they should be baited, recorded and then shamed publicly with the transcript. 2) Why is there no real help line for men, run by men, for men? 3) Warning people about the fake helpline might be another approach to stop them from victimising people.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 07:31 PM
1

Classic case of 'Hitler' overdose: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitler_Has_Only_Got_One_Ball and the side effect of watching way too many episodes of 'Hallo Hallo'. It's what passes for British humour, it's very funny, if only in a meta sort of way.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 09:26 PM
4

And Labour, the Libdems or the Greens would of course support a genuine charity for men and not withdraw funding or, put a Common Purpose stooge in place to run it...
/r/MensRights27/05/15 09:04 PM
1

Why should the government finance (and so, ultimately control) a charity? Charities should just be financed by people who feel it's a cause they want to support, the tax payer should not be forced to contribute at all. After all, it's a charity, not a government service. Now go donate something, instead of demanding that others do it for you.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 09:00 PM
11

I think consent was given here to have sex with a stranger in the dark. So neither he nor she knew if they were romping with a frog. At best both parties are guilty of being randy to the point of utter stupidity. What kind of idiot consents to sex in the dark with a stranger anyway, no matter what their gender is?
/r/MensRights04/05/15 07:03 PM
1

The guy has my deepest sympathy over this ordeal and I hope be wins this lawsuit, but, it could not have happened to a more deserving mother: "115. Paul’s mother, Karin, is a long-time journalist for the National Council of German Women’s Organizations, Deutscher Frauenrat. She is the co-founder, and a writer, on the feminist writer’s blog weibblick and has published on gender-related issues such as feminist theory, women in the media, discrimination of migrant women, equal pay, and women’s righ…
/r/MensRights27/04/15 10:10 PM
1

This reads like a pretentious cooking recipe.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 10:56 PM
1

I can think of at least common 2 jokes involving ladies who would benefit from a Vaginoplasty. Also, there is (iirc) an old saying about mouse/elephant vagina/penis not matching. Either way, it's pretty tasteless to tease anyone about the size of their genital size, let's not add to the disaster.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 02:45 PM
1

Given that this is a deeply entrenched cultural attitude towards disabled children (and not gender related), you can be very certain that had the mother wanted to keep the child, she would have most likely the very same problem with her husband wanting to divorce on the spot.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 08:05 PM
1

How is a women not willing to prove to her partner that he is the father indeed connected to 'marriage being a bad deal for men'? At best it shows that the wife may have been a poor choice, and what about the child's right to know it's orgins? Men need to start making a much bigger deal out of their paternity certificate --- frame it, hang it up for all to see and hold your 'I'm a dad now' party with pride. That normalises the procedure and turns it into a tradition, making it much harder for fr…
/r/MensRights07/01/15 10:23 PM
2

A lot of people seem to resent CHILD maintenance, but when the CHILD is not being maintained with said CHILD maintenance and dares to point this out, the child is blamed for being 'greedy' (...) OP, I can see your point about cheap clothes(and peers can be annoyingly stupid abut such things), but I also think that for the long term, things like extra tuition, books or other educational investments are a much better bet for your future in general, and more likely to have more chance of being supp…
/r/MensRights07/01/15 09:58 PM
1

As much as I dislike censorship, the fact is, Reddit is privately owned and it's their privilege as owners to censor as they like on their platform, and people are free not to use the free service and set up shop elsewhere.
/r/MensRights04/01/15 04:01 PM
6

What makes you think that one does not happen when the other ones does, and how much protection do you think the victim would get from such a predator if another inmate attacked them?
/r/MensRights04/01/15 03:55 PM
1

I think those killjoys mainly object to people enjoying social interaction --- most people don't really need help with bags and other stuff, but fact is, it's as much fun to help someone as it is to be helped.
/r/MensRights04/01/15 03:51 PM
1

That's only part of the story. If she has a live-in partner, the family gets seriously financially penalised, and so, having the dad around (officially) does not make sense at all. Where I live, there's lots of 'single' mothers, who actually stick with their partner (who often is the dad) -- those guys officially live in a bedsit nearby and are always visiting. They would be stupid (and negligent) not to do just that, in essence, the govt. pays a huge incentive to break up families. That's the r…
/r/MensRights04/01/15 03:41 PM
1

Sure I'm with you on this one, right after you sort out the age-old problem of ugly people of any gender not being hired as strippers anywhere. I think a quota will fix that, and to sort out the lack of customers, we'll make it the duty of every citizen to visit a strip club once per year and pay a minimum charge.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 05:02 AM
1

If it really is true that women in films rarely talk to each other about anything other than men, then for once, the feminists actually do have a valid point about crappy scripts.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 04:17 AM
1

More likely girls make them and give them to the boys to wear. Note that he said 'bracelets' not 'looms' or 'loom bands' are the desired item.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 12:02 AM
1

This stupid idea appears to making the rounds... Moreover, it'll be impossible to police, and how they will sort of the problem of fatties spilling into the next seat is also a mystery.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 11:57 PM
1

So what? It's no different to a menu in a restaurant. If you want a male driver, choose a man, otherwise, choose a women, or perhaps, just to be hip, you can ask for the same gender choice as facebook currently offers. Might increase your waiting time, but at least you'll arrive in style.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 11:50 PM
2

... and then you let yourself get roped into buying a nest, and don't come out straight when she clearly is getting broody. She's invested a lot of time into your relationship by now and figured that you will 'come round' (as you did with the house purchase). Doesn't mean she's a bad person, but clearly, she wants a family and you don't and one of you is going to be unhappy, and most likely, it's going to be both of you. Use contraception and be straight forward. She is still young enough to fin…
/r/MensRights24/12/14 11:42 PM
1

Those are bracelets made on a loom device and involves gazillions of little hideously coloured silicone bands, which end up littering the entire house. If you really hate someone and don't want to be obvious about (as in gifting the kid a drum kit or a violin), then this loom is the perfect choice of punishment.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 11:30 PM
-1

"1. Instilling masculinity in Men by: Demanding respect for men. Serving as good male role models. Living independent lives. Fighting chivalry. 2. Instilling femininity in Women: We will hold women equally accountable to men and ignore and shun those who refuse to take any responsibility for their own circumstances. Thus we induce women to take a complementary position with men instead of a competitive position as is now the case. Feminine qualities we want from Women: Being a Nurturer. Being Su…
/r/MensRights15/12/14 05:20 PM
1

The trouble with MGTOW (and WGTOW fwiw) is that it's simply giving in, instead of actually getting things to go your way. You have about until you are 30 to find a meaningful relationship, financial security and to have kids. You can attempt it later, but it gets harder every year. Once that time is gone, it's gone and you're too old --- you have won the battle and lost the war and feminism has eliminated you, for good.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 05:06 PM
2

I think they are great, the more they jump the shark, the harder their nonsense is going to be to sell, and the more discredited (and boring) this all is going to get. The global warming scaremongering ads have exactly the same effect, whether there is global warming or not, by now, everyone is heartily fed up with the crazy claims that are made every day and has filed it all under 'nutty, obsessed and annoying'.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 01:12 AM
5

I think the tl;dr form of this T-shirt is: 'I am an idiot'. Avoid and be grateful they are doing you the favour of loudly advertising their stupidity in public.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 12:59 AM
2

This cuts both ways --- men often dislike women-only gym and pool time (often in the name of 'equality') and want to get those shut down, instead of demanding their own (well deserved) spaces. Gender-exclusive spaces are good for both genders, let's have more of them. Regards taxing bachelors -- that's an old Roman idea, Emperor Augustus made a law like that because apparently people were trying to avoid marriage (due to expense and complexity) and, the Empire needed offspring to thrive. See: ht…
/r/MensRights08/12/14 12:55 AM
2

So, you're not a feminist, but a neuterist?
/r/MensRights08/12/14 12:37 AM
1

You said 'I want to end gender roles'. That means, ending gender roles. It does not mean 'I want to give people a choice of what kind of role they want' but implies that you want to stop people from enjoying a gender role should they choose to do so, since your goal is to end gender roles. If you meant something else, they you need to express that clearly --- we can only take you by the words you type. So, I didn't lay words into your mouth, I only took what you were saying seriously and applied…
/r/MensRights08/12/14 12:29 AM
3

I note you didn't say: 'I want to enable people to live however they prefer', but you say you want to 'end gender roles' which simply says that you want to stop people from enjoying their gender and it's traditional role. Hmm.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 10:39 PM
2

Good on you for making a blog! However, most general sewing technique books are general, and it doesn't take long to find patterns for men either, and quilts are not really gendered either. And it's not only clothes, but also upholstery, curtains and such that is quite fun to make. So, picking up sewing is not very hard for anyone and there are a lot of male designers as well, so role models are not lacking. But please, don't make this.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 10:20 PM
18

Just don't go there, it's not worth the hassle it causes. The moment you hear the words 'I don't want to hear your opinion' you've won the actual argument, and usually that is a clear sign that someone finds the topic distressing (for whatever reason). Public opinion on the issue is turning anyway, and within a year or two, her current opinion on the matter will be outdated by common consensus. It's not worth risking your relationship with her over this, especially not if she feels strongly enou…
/r/MensRights04/12/14 02:58 AM
21

You are missing a great opportunity for drawing a moustache onto her profile picture here.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 02:49 AM
2

1) if you choose to get a vasectomy, be sure to freeze some sperm, it gives you choices later on in life. That said, vasectomies are not risk-free, and really, it's an over the top method for staying out of trouble that could otherwise be dealt with trivially. It would be far smarter to ensure she is wearing a coil instead, cheaper and safer. 2) since you are married, if she gets pregnant by another guy, you are still going to be on the hook for supporting that child. (which is why a coil is pre…
/r/MensRights03/12/14 05:07 PM
1

No-one is denied anything, other than tedious leafing through many toys that usually would not interest them. If a kid wants anything, they are very sure to let you know in great detail, that's why it's called 'pester-power'.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 01:29 PM
1

Given the drink&shag scene in the UK, a seminar on how to avoid being jumped on by one of those ladies is probably more appropriate.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 08:38 PM
1

I agree it's one-sided, Mary Whitehouse would be proud. Otoh, why would anyone want to shag a drunk anyway? Yuck. So I'd be in full support of embellishing this quality sexist poster with a big fluorescent pink sticker along the lines of 'Real people don't shag legless drunks of any gender'. (aside from the question: what is too drunk to consent? Do we need to start carrying a breathalyser, and anyone too drunk to drive is deemed off limits?)
/r/MensRights19/11/14 04:55 PM
1

Sounds like a great opportunity to start handing out pink feathers of shame to the female Selective Service dodgers.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 05:23 PM
2

Germany used to have conscription and recruits were able to serve in social services instead of the army. This made a lot of hospitals, social services and old people's homes run much better than with paid staff, and people of all walks of life learned a lot about real life in general and doing their duty helped many people grow up during that time. But women didn't like the idea of having to serve, and so it was abolished in the name of equality.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 09:59 PM
2

Yeah, why don't we all just die out :-D And having kids in your 30's and 40's is so much healthier and easier to manage than in your 20's. All those people who are still normal... it's scandalous that this is tolerated.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 09:51 PM
2

"There are a lot of maybes and unknowns here." Well, the guy's friends have put up a webpage with vids of the event and tweet captures from the 'victim' here: http://chedevans.com/ so you can take a close look for yourself at the facts. As far as I can see, it's just a bog standard case of drunks have consensual group sex, as appears to be a routine event nowadays. My guess is that his conviction will be quashed, as it should be.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 09:40 PM
2

From the article: "Or rather, now that we know the gender of the job additions, waitresses." Working as waitstaff in the US seems to be closer to legalised pan handling than being a real job, given the dependence on tips, and the figures don't look as if more people are earning more money to spend in restaurants either, but more like people deciding to spend money on opening restaurants.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 09:02 PM
1

That petition is an absolute hoot, it looks like it was just ye olde quality trollage.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 08:48 PM
3

I don't use slurs on principle, but if anyone does I have no problem with that, it makes them easy to categorise. Especially when their usernames are already obvious red flags.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 08:08 PM
-14

You could just act like a normal person and not stare in fascination like a small child, if only to not embarrass yourself in public. And don't take up poker until you mastered this.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 08:03 PM
2

I find freedom of speech quite handy, it saves me from having to waste time to figure out who the idiots are. Even if some people end up demand the muzzling of others whilst talking about vomiting.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 07:37 PM
0

As heartless as it sounds, don't do that. The cops will probably charge the man and most of those fights amount to nothing more than a few gashes, bruises and the odd broken nose/fingers. Looks and sounds dramatic but usually it's just noisy(and overly emotional), especially if they are frequent players. If there is a serious situation going on, it usually is very silent, as long as you hear them yell and break stuff, they are still OK. If you call the cops, the cops will want your statement and…
/r/MensRights04/11/14 11:42 PM
-9

So, because 5% of men get harassed that makes the harassment in general ok then? Do you harass others? If not, what stops you from doing so? This entire thing smacks of 'men naturally act like randy dogs who cannot help themselves' trope. Moreover, this kind of move never works anywhere, there is no culture on earth where harassing a women ever results in a date, unless she is a hooker looking for business.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 01:15 AM
3

Just as well they didn't because if they had then there would a long queue of people claiming the same 'right' for any other case there is. At which point we might as well just go back to the inquisition and the torture chamber.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 01:08 AM
3

I have never heard of any culture where this is acceptable.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 01:01 AM
2

DavidByron2 clearly thinks that accosting random strangers is ok and that basic manners do not exist in 'other cultures'.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 12:52 AM
0

So, all the men in the video were just paid actors working to a script? And, why does the race of the perps matter so much to you -- would it be less bad if there were more Japanese/Chinese/Eskimo men in the sorry selection of oiks? Those men made themselves the target by targeting that women, it's irrelevant whether she was an actress or not. If they had not acted that way, there would be no video.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 12:45 AM
6

It certainly feels like this subreddit has been invaded by non MRA guys trying to act the way they think MRAs do (and failing badly). And the idea that 'underprivileged non-white guys'(as some posters put it) have a culture that compels (and entitles) them to act like cavemen is a non-starter (and very racist).
/r/MensRights31/10/14 12:20 AM
1

It took her 10 hours to receive 100 comments! ... and when you walk down the road, you have the same experience, right? There's men and women all over you (some even following you) but, that's totally normal, and you have no problems with fending off an idiot every 6 minutes. For a change, this video actually makes a grim point about reality, but because GamerGate and feminists, it's ok with you. Lame.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 11:50 PM
1

Because anything that's not a burka instantly turns otherwise totally normal men into pests without manners or dignity (or brains).
/r/MensRights30/10/14 11:17 PM
1

Has any women ever 'complimented' you like that, without being a hooker looking for business? :-) (and what if it's a bloke who does it to you?)
/r/MensRights30/10/14 11:06 PM
0

So, it's all paid actors in that video?
/r/MensRights30/10/14 11:00 PM
-1

So 10 people per hour accosting you is ok? Where is your threshhold --- 20 per hour starts to be a problem? What if everyone starts to pester everyone else like that? And why only target young women? What about a little tom calling? Imagine getting accosted like that by middle aged women all the time, or perhaps other guys. It'll be pretty lively. And whatever your race is, manners are (or at least should be) universal.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 10:58 PM
1

So, you're all in favour of women wearing burkas, just so idiots don't pester them? As to your racist attempt to make this about racism... don't bother.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 10:45 PM
-2

Do you think that Latino and African-american women enjoy men acting stupid? Or that they are 'less sheltered'? Oh look, dude acts like an imbecile, he must be a great catch! Because, stupidity and bad manners are sooo sexy.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 10:37 PM
2

Quack...
/r/MensRights30/10/14 10:29 PM
-2

How about just simply not acting like apes in musth? There is zero change that anyone (male or female) is going to find that kind of harassment 'sexy', it's just stupid behaviour by annoying people. [Men don't find this funny either, hen parties and drunk gaggles of girls behaving badly is quite common, and it never is fun for their victims.]
/r/MensRights30/10/14 10:16 PM
-5

The point of him doing that is trollage. They don't do it because they think they'll luck out or to be nice, but because it's fun to troll. But when you're the victim, you have no idea just how far that guy will go -- might paw you, might try to rip your bag and run, or, maybe sticking a knife into you, who knows, crazy person will be crazy, no-one is sure just how crazy.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 10:07 PM
2

Make your own mind up: http://www.chedevans.com/ Quote: "The police arrested both Ched and Clayton at the station, they acknowledged that the only evidence that sexual activity had taken place was their admission. There was no complaint of rape, no forensic evidence, no injury and no complaint."
/r/MensRights19/10/14 06:01 PM
1

Older people do have a lot of choice (there is an army of old lonely hearts out there) and certainly not 'reduced' privileges, just different interests to when they were younger. True, you get the doormat crowd that has little self-esteem and puts up with horrible situations, but they did that when they were younger too.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 08:06 PM
1

In general, older people put up with a lot less nonsense than younger people do, so... you'll find that they are a lot easier to get along with whilst at the same time being far more difficult, due to having solid opinions backed up by long experience and not being so much into experimenting any more, since they want stuff to just work, without a lot of silly hassle.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 07:57 PM
1

Feminists are very anti-women and not at all interested in women's rights, and the hate looks kind of big on them, at least to anyone who bothers to take a closer look. From that conclusion, it's only another glance to to spot that men are getting even more stick than 'the wrong kind of women' do. The age thing is just because people gather experience over time and are less likely to be bullied into conforming and more critical of what's 'on sale', but there are plenty of young women who are not…
/r/MensRights03/10/14 10:21 PM
2

That was still possible in the 1970's, and no matter how cold, long skirts were not allowed either. (compare to boys getting baked in long trousers in the summer nowadays in some places) And not conforming to the custom of wearing make-up can cost women jobs and social standing too -- in the same way that some clubs bar women wearing flats. The problem here is too many hopped up nannies wanting to decide other people's lives by confusing them with interior design objects.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 09:05 AM
2

Looks like the frat guys have to start organising weekend outings privately. And demand adamantly that they are allowed to join Sororities. (Will women be allowed to join a Sorority AND a Fraternity?)
/r/MensRights28/09/14 07:36 PM
0

If you only plan for a limited time, a relationship like that is ok, but it's still wasting your time which you could better invest in someone of your own age to get old with. Smart ladies pick a guy 7-8 years younger than them.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 07:29 PM
3

On the positive side, what this 'freedom' does is show up the poisonous oiks. Would you rather they hid their bad side behind the veneer of perfect manners? In that sense, feminism is actually a positive force -- venomous snakes have markings for reason, please don't remove them. They may be women, but actually they are bad people who happen to be female. It just makes your search for real people easier, keep going.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 11:21 PM
1

All the more fodder for the sceptics -- the comments in TIFU were great. Give that nutty 'lady' an award for providing a prime quality vaccine against group think stupidity.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 11:11 PM
3

Nope, not quite. 'People Rights' would though. (note that 'feminists' are not really on the side of women neither, it's more of a 'Queen Bee Movement'. Bzzt. )
/r/MensRights23/09/14 11:03 PM
1

Or 'TheyForThem'.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 11:00 PM
19

I like the red paint trick. On the good side, this didn't get very far, so chalk it up to 'good news'. (makes me think that whenever blood is involved, the key is to demand a sample be taken, lest your blood gets held up as proof against you)
/r/MensRights23/09/14 10:58 PM
0

Um, if you block them you cannot out them for talking shite. Let them. People can think for themselves, and they will. Someone somewhere once said wisely: We cannot force them to tell the truth, but we can force them to lie more outrageously and obviously than ever.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 10:40 PM
1

Moreover she married him afterwards and would very much like the entire thing to go away. Now one can disagree with the 'style' those people employ when dealing with each other(and it certainly is naff, wtf), but unless one of them complains, or you have to suffer them as a neighbour yelling at each other constantly, it's none of your business. Next up: we start harassing couples for not buying each other enough flowers or cooking crappy meals for each other.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 10:36 PM
1

Clearly the man has never heard of 'brewer's droop'. It's probably more effective to ban men from using deodorant and demand that any clothes they wear are made from sacking material.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 10:26 PM
1

You could tentatively suggest to the eager pastor to 'get with the times' and set up the single moms to marry each other... /s
/r/MensRights23/09/14 07:51 PM
0

So are women -- single motherhood is not great (even if you have enough money). (and isn't there a tax penalty for marriage in the US?) But it's a pyrrhic victory for either gender, there is an army of lonely, child-free pensioners out there right now, and in 20 years' time the problem will even be worse. Whilst that is the best deal possible for many people, it's not exactly fun. What we need is PMTS (people making their space) instead of allowing ourselves to be spooked into a solo life. (some…
/r/MensRights23/09/14 07:46 PM
2

Ooooh --- a pic of a nekkid women, wot a rarity, don't get to see these every day at every street corner in every direction we look.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 04:27 PM
1

Welcome to the human zoo. The best you can do is carefully observe the pandemonium and treat it as an interesting sociology experiment. You could stick your neck out, but that is very likely to have negative results for you personally which far outweigh the benefits that can be gained. If you want to say something now, write a nice, polite letter to her to explain that this was incredibly awkward and snail it anonymously, and explain that you'd be worried to sign your name because the environmen…
/r/MensRights17/09/14 11:57 PM
2

This most likely will turn out to be counterproductive in the long run. And the general mood is already shifting, it may not seem that way, but men and women are starting to tire of getting nannied by feminists and it's no longer unusual to see lots people being openly sceptical in ways that would have been social suicide just 2-3 years ago. In fact, it's becoming rare to see radical feminists not being put on the spot when they post, unless there is enough banning and deleting going on to hide …
/r/MensRights17/09/14 11:26 PM
1

I don't think you can do therapy for something that is a natural instinct. The best solution really is to offer mixed hours and women and men only hours, that way everyone is actually included at their own comfort level. As an aside, women tend to stare critically at each other much more than men do, so, it's not definitely not the ogling that's the problem here. My guess is that it simply is the way human psychology works, and some men feel awkward training with women as well. And I don't see w…
/r/MensRights17/09/14 10:25 PM
3

What exactly stops people from sponsoring internships for men in open source? And why do they want to tell others what to do with their money? Quit whinging about what other people do, instead build up your own charity, because, whilst IT is male dominated, there are plenty of men who really would benefit from internships. And it looks like X.org is doing that as well, see here: http://www.x.org/wiki/XorgEVoC/
/r/MensRights06/09/14 02:27 PM
4

It's not a numbers game -- one beaten woman does not negate a man pressed into paternity servitude, it just yields a beaten women and an enslaved man. We should worry about each and everyone of them. And the problem is not the decent people out there, but the rip-off and hassle merchants who serially ruin lives.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 06:27 PM
1

No it's not. Dating exists to find out if you're compatible in principle. And marrying someone you don't know very well is simply a crapshoot. Maybe we should ban divorce alltogether and only grant marriage licences to couples that manage to cohabit (say) 10 year without trouble, it would solve a lot of problems and make people much more careful what they commit to.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 06:10 PM
10

Maybe they just don't attract the crazy princesses?
/r/MensRights28/08/14 05:45 PM
0

Reminds me of this... Our culture is built upon 'fighting the just cause'. And fakes don't last all that long, especially when they are blatantly obvious (and annoying). It'll take a few more iterations, but, that pot is definitely coming to to the boil, and a lot of people will be very angry that they've been had. Keep it up, with a smile.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 05:39 PM
4

I don't see how changing the current laws will change the fact that a lot of people are not worth marrying. If they can't rip you off with the help of the law, they'll find other ways, it's not the law that's the problem but the people who abuse it to abuse others. Maybe the solution is to wait 10-20 years and if you still are together and happy, then you can risk getting married (if it makes financial sense, which often it doesn't). (I agree that the current laws should be changed, but I really…
/r/MensRights28/08/14 11:00 AM
0

There are lots of foreign maids who get entrapped, raped and killed by their ME employers. At times there is the odd article about it in the newspaper(do a Google search for Filipina+maid+slavery), but mostly, no-one cares about it or does anything about it, and it's been going on for years.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 10:33 PM
3

Men: Wear a kilt or a loose long jacket. Girls: button your blouse. Psst: PM me if you want to buy a fashionable burka.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 11:37 PM
0

Let me translate this for you :) "I love the idea of being an MRA but we are doing something that we started out fighting." Agree, then admonish, and remind the peasants that the subsequent sin is bad, if not worse than the original one. "As our movement grows larger, we are forgetting the most important of phrases. "Not all..." is really important in remembering the fact that, for example, not all feminists are just patriarchy believers and not all feminists are fighting against imaginary threa…
/r/MensRights18/08/14 11:29 PM
1

It's not about what women think of your penis, it's how you (and other victims) feel about their penis. So it's great to hear that you are not greatly affected by your circumcision, but telling other victims to STFU and comparing them to haters for complaining about being mutilated and trying to prevent other people from having the same horrible experience is stupid. Was foot binding a huge problem back in China? Not really, since it only affected rich women and quite a few of the victims were p…
/r/MensRights15/08/14 03:23 PM
1

With the Oz madness, there is nothing you can do but to move country.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 08:48 AM
1

Most men (if they still have their senses) would not want sex with a feminist. The target is the other women. Moreover, what are you actually getting in return currently? It's all a bit meh. Time to ask for more. And whilst there is MGTOW, the quick gratification of hook-ups is still available, which keep the mess ticking over.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 08:48 AM
0

Looking at history, it hasn't been tried so it hasn't failed. And women are not so different from men in this regard, just look at the efforts they make in spending time and money on fashion and make-up. Some of that is to impress other women, but mostly, it's designed to be man-bait. Men have far more leverage here than they think they do.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 12:24 AM
2

So what, you get a few scabs, but if the bulk of men refuses sex, especially casual sex, it would get noticed...
/r/MensRights09/07/14 12:04 AM
3

A sex strike would be more effective.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 07:34 PM
0

Because nature being what it is, makes women despise weak men, in the same way that that it makes men toe the line and excel in life, in order to impress, please and woo women. If it were not so, humanity would still be walking on all fours.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 11:10 PM
2

I'm all in favour for ending the Men's Rights Movement. Right after we achieved obsolescence by achieving our goals but not a moment before that (...unlike feminism...)
/r/MensRights25/05/14 10:57 PM
2

Because divorce as you think it exists doesn't really happen for real. Don't marry unless you mean it.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 10:55 PM
1

I'm don't think this is a gender thing, its more of a cultural issue. For the past 2-3 generations, kids of either gender haven't been raised to tidy and clean as they go, but have been allowed to skive chores and the culture of being house-proud has been dumped as 'oppressive'. Being tidy is an ingrained habit that is very difficult to pick up as an adult, so, it's best not to share house with a messie in the first place --- because this always ends up as an unwinnable war and misery for both s…
/r/MensRights22/05/14 04:46 PM
2

Maybe you could convince OKCupid to ban everyone from Brunei who tries to visit their website? This strategy worked such a treat last time, and the LGBT community made lots of friends. /s Btw, the new stoning will not only affect gay people, but also straights(for adultery) and most likely in much higher numbers than LGBTs. I think this action here would go a lot further if it didn't ignore the other potential victims of this inhumane law... And, the other tragedy is that by now, a lot of people…
/r/MensRights06/05/14 08:15 PM
2

As I said above, IUD work if the doc who fits them has a lot of practice doing so and makes the effort of getting it right. The ladies you took to the ER most likely had an unsuitable IUD fitted (they come in different sizes...) by someone who is not well versed in the procedure. Also IUD appear to reduce the risk of cervical cancer-- http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(11)70223-6/abstract. I don't know where you get the idea of tumors, death and scarring from -- 1 in …
/r/MensRights13/04/14 10:16 PM
1

Just ignore it, it's best to just nod politely and then let them talk amongst themselves and most of what they have to say isn't all that interesting either. Also, having a voice doesn't mean you're entitled to other people's ears... There are not that many female geeks anyway, and most of the genuine ones are not into feminism because they can see through the BS and find it annoying because it usually ends up being a problem for them.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 03:20 PM
0

IUD are fine, but you need to find a gyno who does a lot of them, it makes a huge difference. If you let a nurse or a gyno who rarely fits them administer this, you're asking for trouble. Btw, vasectomy is not without risks, and those have far more unpleasant outcomes than a IUD that goes awry. Notably so: Pain in the testicles that doesn’t go away. This is called postvasectomy pain >syndrome and occurs in about 10% of men.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 03:09 PM
0

Teenagers are not exactly famous for their manners and reasonableness.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 11:38 PM
2

Sounds like you need a new job...
/r/MensRights08/04/14 11:31 PM
12

Are you sure this is not an instruction on how to safely pet a cat without getting shredded? (j/k) Personally I find a clear 'Not tonight Joseph(ine)' far simpler.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 11:26 PM
1

A 1/4 of gay men don't know they are infected with HIV And there is the Window Period which is 3-6 month during which there is no test available that works. Exactly the same reasons as for Mad Cow disease and mathematically, 'discrimination' of gay men here sadly makes sense. Also think how bad gay men would feel knowing they had infected a lot of already very sick people by accident whilst trying to help them. So, the blood donation centers are protecting not only the patients from HIV but also…
/r/MensRights04/04/14 07:39 PM
2

So, if girls get their genitals mutilated, that would be OK in your book, as long as they have general anesthetic first and, it pleases the men that they no longer have a clitoris? What if you parents had sold one of your kidneys as payment for bringing you up, would that be fine with you too? After all, you love them and they gave you your life, so, you ought to be grateful and not begrudge them that little income.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 05:05 PM
3

Is an inmate of the North Korean concentration camps a victim if he survived the experience and later on got rich from the invention he thought off whilst being incarcerated and starved? Should he be paying Kim Il Jong royalties for the inspiration?
/r/MensRights02/04/14 05:01 PM
2

What about the myriads of mutilated men who have lost their penis (or part of it) or who now have permanently painful genitals or those who caught a life-long STD from the procedure? What about the many dead baby boys that results from this 'tradition'? You simply had a lucky escape, that's all, it doesn't change the fact that circumcision results in permanent disfigurement, castration and death.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 04:54 PM
7

What's wrong with deferring the start of serving the sentence until the kid is 18? And, split the 'time off' equally between both parents.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 04:37 PM
2

There are quite a few women (and men) who wished that men would not monopolize the toilet by sitting on it for hours whilst reading but stand up and quick about their business. But in general, when you see people send admonishing emails about toilet seats, it's a sure sign that you are dealing with nutters and you should prepare for more insanity of that kind.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 12:30 PM
1

There is a valid point to complaining about the fashion industry, but the problem is an economical one. In general, straight cut, tight clothes do not look good on women because they have curves, and those curves mean the fabric falls and pulls differently, causing even people who are even just a little overweight to look like a pressed sausage, which does nothing for anyone's self esteem. But it's cheaper to produce Mao-suit style garments and the fact that smaller people have slightly differen…
/r/MensRights01/04/14 12:21 PM
1

And make a point of saying how much this harassment distresses you and exacerbates your health condition. Check if you can sue as well. If not for yourself, then for every couple that gets harassed in future.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 11:43 AM
1

Marriage strike would be a good idea if we lived longer. But the law (and society) can (and will) stay irrational longer than you will be fertile. We already have too many oldies who were holding out for that perfect match and then settled for anyone they could get in the end, desperately hoping for IVF to work and too many communities where marriages are the exception since decades. The marriage strike has been going on since the 60's and, clearly it's not working because sabotaging marriage is…
/r/MensRights12/03/14 10:33 PM
1

Child-free men's rights are very different in nature to father's men's rights and abolishing marriage is a feminist goal.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 09:35 PM
2

Why should she let a man who no longer is her partner ogle her vagina? And, requesting to be present at the vasectomy is reasonable by your logic --- after all, in many jurisdictions the wife needs to give written consent (since she is deemed to have a stake in his fertility) and she may want to verify that it really happened.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 08:31 PM
1

More than one man found that that certain things are very difficult to unsee and a lot of women prefer them not to be there for that very reason.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 07:18 PM
2

You forgot to say 'black' men. Asians and whites need not apply. Why do you expect people to support a racist initiative? It's no different to the KKK advertising help for white males only, selling a racist ideology on the back of real equality issues is the lowest of the low.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 11:48 AM
1

Yeah I agree, the response to your racist griefmongering post is disappointing, I would have expected (and hoped) that more people would take a few moments to let you know that racists are not welcome here, even if they claim to be MRA. Thought experiment: if Bush would have started a 'white boys only' program, with the (factually correct) reasoning that numerically there are more white boys that are disadvantaged than black boys, would you think that is something to be supported, because it's a…
/r/MensRights01/03/14 09:38 AM
0

I guess this is a point where you and the feminists agree that women should work and use daycare instead of DIY mothering. Kids don't do as well in daycare as they do with a well-educated SAHM, and have more behavioural problems and delayed development. If both parents work, usually it ends up being a serious slog (even if your kids go to day care) and you get at least 18 years of that. Alimony usually is charged on a sliding scale depending on your earnings, and tends to be as much as they can …
/r/MensRights26/02/14 09:41 PM
3

I recommend that people avoid restaurants for dating because the entire thing is just too awkward, whether he or she pays, offense here can go either way. Incidentally, gay people have exactly the same dilemma. Besides people don't look all that enticing when they are chewing, so for vanity reasons alone I'd avoid the eatery initially. You get a far better idea who someone is if you use the a nice park or zoo to meet, walk and chat and it's less obliging as well.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 05:48 PM
3

Your brother's essay is a classic example of why teaching critical thought and analysis in school and later on in university is important. It's not really his fault -- humanity spent hundreds of years and millions of lives on learning this art, so it's not something that is easily constructed from first principles and needs to be taught, and it's not something you can learn in one afternoon either. Forget the feminist angle of the piece, it's a symptom that shows up to a gap in his education, I …
/r/MensRights22/02/14 05:27 PM
1

That's a pretty gory story about a narrow escape, but I don't think that self-mutilation to avoid further abortions by unhinged women is a good solution, it sounds to me like you actually would like to be a father at some point and you'd only end up punished twice this way. People here think that sending pics wouldn't happen --- well, women who just had an abortion get a massive hormone crash and may get quite irrational.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 12:44 AM
1

So, are you saying that people who randomly assault others should also be put away for longer? Because they are an even bigger threat to society since anyone could be their victim for any reason. And what about perps who are smart enough not to state a reason in the first place?
/r/MensRights20/02/14 06:19 PM
1

There is no lasting laser treatment available -- we can put buggies on Mars, but not fix unwanted facial hair :(
/r/MensRights20/02/14 06:12 PM
1

Remind me, what are we paying the police for?
/r/MensRights20/02/14 06:09 PM
2

It's nothing to do with 'cultural view' or 'perception', a beard is a male secondary sex characteristic. You cannot 'challenge' or 'change' reality here, the only fix is permanent hair removal, which is something we've not invented yet; and better manners in dealing with people who do not fit our norms. (and the hair removal option is probably the easier one to achieve of the two solutions...)
/r/MensRights20/02/14 05:44 PM
1

This problem starts in early childhood, with children expecting their mothers to to provide constant company and feeding/cleaning services. I think that if we start sending them to work early, this habit of fleecing other people to support their lifestyle isn't going to develop in the first place, freeing mothers from the drudgery to raising children so they can spend more time on their career, which in turn will liberate men from having to support their family. If we also add a compulsory sex-c…
/r/MensRights19/02/14 02:48 PM
8

Kind of grim that men have to undergo surgical mutilation in order to stop their sperm from being stolen. Then there is the 'the doctor granted my wishes' bit too --- why is it his business what you do with your body? He kindly let you off forced fatherhood because you appear to be 'harvested' already, how very generous of him. Male liberty comes at a high price indeed.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 02:48 PM
1

Spot on. You only need to look at his cartoons to see that he actually agrees with many of the MRA talking points and principles. If he didn't, you'd not see those kind of cartoons from him... Note he didn't actually say that the MRA is bad (or why he thinks so) but just that he cannot afford being seen in public holding an opinion that is unpopular with 'the mob'. If he was so against the MRA and the reasons why MRA exists, he would have deleted the cartoons that support the MRA stance, instead…
/r/MensRights28/01/14 01:05 PM
5

It's all fun and games until someone ends unemployable or, in a re-education camp for 'tolerance'.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 02:23 AM
2

Well, being a traditional lady and housewife is to be the new rebel. Like an 80's punk but with proper 'shock value'. So you might as well get used to people being confused, because your goal is to live like the very people that their parents told them to avoid. It challenges a core belief they've been brainwashed with that they never questioned, and as you're finding, the very act of doing so has a high social cost. Best thing is to ruthlessly sort and not waste time, if they don't get it, then…
/r/MensRights22/01/14 02:09 AM
-5

Not a MRM topic, should be posted to /r/manners instead. Men are just as annoyed to read a rude, emotional Linus-style rant as women are, and no-one needs this kind of thing anyway, stuff like that is just too depressing and demotivational --- whether you see someone getting dissed or if it's aimed yourself. Linus just wants a free pass here to behave badly, and if Linus wasn't Linus(tm) he would long have been plonked for being serially and seriously annoying. The only card that's being played …
/r/MensRights20/01/14 07:20 PM
1

Well, then leave if up to God and the women in question, and don't worry yourself about it. It's not your business to question her Deen, nor is your personal interpretation of God's intention of interest to anyone.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 01:03 AM
1

The 'covering up' is a recent thing in Islam (see older pictures of Iran, Egypt and Afghanistan, etc, you'll see lots of women without hijabs or abayas, and plenty of minidresses too). Moreover, many Muslims disagree with the idea that hijab is compulsory, and the problem of misogyny arises when women are forced by community pressure to conform on pain of being called a whore and having their family intimidated and shamed. In other words, it's none of anyones' business whether a woman wants to w…
/r/MensRights08/01/14 10:53 PM
2

Ignore the feminists, they are just piggybacking on an age-old social problem. Plenty of men don't like to sit on toilets that have been used like a urinal as well... or people of all genders argue if the seat goes up or down and which way round the toilet roll goes, or if there is too much reading material on the floor, and even how long people spend on the throne. If you cannot agree on how to use the toilet, get a home that has two of them, and then everyone is happy.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 10:42 PM
0

Not being out nappies of at the age of 5 is proof of bad education and overall neglect, and what progress has been lost in the first 7 years of life cannot be caught up later. What you're looking at here is systematic (and often institutional) child abuse.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 03:41 AM
1

Most likely to be a function of toddlers and babies being warehoused in nurseries during work time. "61 per cent had reached the expected standard of literacy – 69 per cent of girls and 53 per cent of boys." So, 31% of girls are also not thriving, all in all, the figures are very bad for either gender, and one gender doing worse than the other when the overall success is looking very bad isn't a measure of success at all. Looks to me like they are ALL trailing behind, and you can't tell what dam…
/r/MensRights07/01/14 03:36 AM
1

Have you considered that Dilaudid might add to her problems? It has a range of side effects that are not very pleasant. Chronic pain (such as Fibromyalgia causes) can make the nicest person quite mad. Keep in mind what was posted here, but also consider if changing meds and lifting free weights (see Mr. Rippetoe's links) might help things for the better. Also, it may not be Fibromyalgia, doctors like to 'diagnose' this if they run out of ideas or are lazy. Give another doctor a try (check them o…
/r/MensRights07/01/14 03:16 AM
2

Before puberty it's not an issue, kids of either gender are fairly well matched at that time, and if they enjoy the game and can compete on an even level, why not?
/r/MensRights07/01/14 02:47 AM
0

You may as well demand that the Humane Society stops taking in animals in order to house the homeless. Their money, their choice. How about the complainants here set up their own charity that allocates grants to men?
/r/MensRights05/01/14 05:04 PM
1

Mother's Rights? "Mother's Privileges" is more like it.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 08:47 PM
1

Why should anyone be interested in someone's sexuality unless they are courting them? It's just rude in general to label people in this way as if there is nothing more important or notable about them.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 05:11 PM
1

Nah, what gives you this irrational worry? Dating feminists is as safe as a keeping a blue-ringed octopus.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 04:16 PM
11

What better reason to split the bill with your date than this? The more PR she gets, the better.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 04:06 PM
2

Why Women Can’t Do Pull-Ups
/r/MensRights28/12/13 05:40 PM
1

Sounds like being a marine no longer is a smart choice for smart people.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 12:53 AM
4

You're the one giving that very pass.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 12:48 AM
7

If he is smart this is the last he'll see of her. If she punches him, she'll punch other people. It doesn't take a lot of force to blind someone or otherwise seriously hurt them. Sounds like he isn't the first victim, but hopefully, he'll be her last.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 12:41 AM
1

If you like your underwear functional, but find you have to strip seductively, just pretend you're going commando and discreetly remove the sensible underpants at the same time as the jeans or skirt. Works for both genders, spend the saved money on something fun instead and stay comfy.
/r/MensRights27/12/13 02:00 PM
1

Good approach, but be prepared to hang up multiple copies as yours will get vandalised by people who think can change reality by denying it. The sidebar would be greatly improved if we had a collection of such posters.
/r/MensRights27/12/13 01:40 PM
1

Technically, it's of course more difficult to be an engineer, but most engineers wouldn't be so interested to swap their job for a career as a toilet cleaner. So, best answer here is: 'It's relative', sometimes 'easier' is actually 'harder'. (also note the rapidly dropping birthrate and the fact that most countries now operate nurseries that take 6-month old babies.)
/r/MensRights27/12/13 01:33 PM
0

What's the future of this relationship? Not a good one. If she does this, she'll do other things, it's a symptom of horrors to come, there is a reason why she thinks along those lines. I'm with antifeminista on this, get out of this relationship whilst you can and before things get worse.
/r/MensRights24/12/13 12:21 AM
1

I'd leave my defensive weapons in my pocket, but... I'd subject her to a polite but very sticky interview as to why she is trying to rape me, and what her motivation for this oppressive and rude behavior is, and what her plans are to educate herself in order to never sexually assault anyone again. I'd also ask her about her if she has other assaults she might need to think about, and if she has any contact with vulnerable persons, or children. And I'll be sure do this very loudly and as noticeab…
/r/MensRights23/12/13 01:57 PM
1

Even quite a few gay people do not support gay marriage. It's an off-topic request, you might as well demand that the MRM takes a position on political parties, animal rights and the general state of the world. Is so not going to happen.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 12:46 AM
-1

I'm totally against any shelters of any kind. (edit: for anyone, men or women) There are plenty of cheap hotels around, no need to open up yet another branch of the shelter industry (which will get taken over by the wrong side in no time anyway). People in those situation need good legal advice and help to help themselves, not free housing run (and controlled) by professional activists.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 07:49 PM
8

I think it's a function of the 'old girls club' that has been shaping up over the past 30 years in our schools, creating 'jobs for the girls' and who have been systematically backstabbing and otherwise harassing male colleagues.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 07:39 PM
5

Why is everyone banging on about her being female? She did the right thing, for all of us. And last time I looked, MensRights has plenty of female posters who are MRAs, give people a break.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 07:36 PM
3

HR's worth their salt anywhere are already is looking out for that kind of thing. Not for political reasons, but because such people are walking lawsuits in general. Remember HR isn't employed to keep things 'fair' but to keep the company safe from lawsuits and saboteurs.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 07:31 PM
1

Look up how narcissists and psychopaths operate. Feminism appears to be the latest popular weapon of choice. Whenever someone makes a lot of rules by which they try and control your behavior, step back, forget about the show they put on, and, look for the (wo)man behind the curtain. You usually find a narcissist or psychopath lurking there, trying to manipulate the rest of the world, for fun and profit.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 11:33 AM
1

It's normal when kids are competitive, but boys and girls develop in different ways at different rates, and need a gender specific schooling approach to support that fact of life. The mistake made here is trying to make boys into girls and girls into boys, gender mainstreaming is not good for either gender. Which is why children in gender segregated schools do a lot better and this idea that boys and girls are the same thing (instead of being humans who are moral equals) is nonsense. And yes, at…
/r/MensRights21/12/13 10:38 AM
3

I have a suspicion that Gay marriage is being sold to people in order to protect the marriage industry/divorce lawyers' recently rapidly falling revenues, given how few people nowadays go for a legal contract that only has downsides. Also, married people pay more taxes... hmm. Anything legal you need to have in place can be arranged by other (cheaper and saner) means, and nothing stops you from sharing your life anyway. If you're still not convinced, take a look how badly wrong this can go. Ka-c…
/r/MensRights20/12/13 05:37 AM
5

Close but no cigar. Love the way he first tells how he nearly gets raped on the men's loo by a drunk women, and then rationalises it away and files it under "I refrained, partly because I knew I would regret it afterwards, but more importantly because I knew it was highly likely that she would regret it, if not immediately, then certainly the next day. " The male privilege is strong in this one.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 11:05 PM
2

Yeah, and the Nazis invented environmental laws to save nature, built the autobahns and did a lot for social welfare too. Maybe fascism was just misunderstood, a movement led by a compassionate vegetarian who saved lots of lives by banning smoking where ever he could can't be all that evil, right?
/r/MensRights19/12/13 09:47 PM
3

We think that feminist supremacy is a Goddess given right and would applaud the wonderful feminists to keep being wonderful and show those uppity men that they are nothing but dirt underneath their sacred high-heels. Feminist's rightful and just anger is liberating music to our ears, and we support the right of women to crush any male who dares to think that they are an equal part of humanity. We absolutely support feminists' justified and wise hate of men who dare to demand rights, despite bein…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 11:57 PM
5

On balance it was a favor, it doesn't sound like a place where anyone would want to be. If you weren't depressed before, you'd certainly be after a visit.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 11:36 PM
1

Feel free to wear what you want and the rest of the world will feel free to think about you whatever they like. Regards men no longer dressing impractically and looking like a garish clown, could it be that perhaps they are smarter than women who appear to want to impersonate a Christmas tree? Some people just have taste, others don't.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 11:32 PM
2

Sounds like a perfect litmus test for checking out any partner you're thinking of hitching up with. 2-3 weeks of this, and you have your answer whether they are worthwhile spending your life with. Why spend time with someone you have to disagree with all the time? So even if you 'argue' back, it's still going to be grim.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 05:05 PM
1

I think years of taking the pill has pickled her brains somewhat. " No more doctor's appointments, repeat prescriptions, injections, mood swings and irritability for us." Sure, not taking the pill will do away with needing jabs and being ill in general, and men never have mood swings or are irritable. "Women aren't different – we're being as selfless and sensible as we can be. So when it comes to the introduction of the male pill, I've got some selfish demands. " ba-boom-tish Side note: painful …
/r/MensRights15/12/13 04:05 AM
3

Either of those things don't cancel they just add up. People who think that one is ok because they other occurs just support abuse and are no different from the very people they claim to be against.
/r/MensRights14/12/13 11:14 PM
1

On balance, I think banning the color pink on any toy for whatever gender would be a great move just because it maketh the eyes water.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 08:10 PM
1

Feminists make the same point about men:only useful as sperm banks and cash-cows, otherwise, unpredictable wastes of space. Also, the Taliban would agree with you too. Btw, your understanding of history is a bit off. It was only the Greeks who had this kind of abusive society, which is one major reason why they lost comprehensively to the Romans (who didn't, and thus had a far stronger society)
/r/MensRights07/12/13 12:57 AM
2

The person who argues this clearly hasn't informed themselves. Or they are a feminist troll. Smile and pass them a MRM-link-u-like (GirlWritesWhat is a good choice, or this sub), and talk about something else. If they are smart, they will know what they are looking at, if not, well, you'd only be wasting your time anyway.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 12:18 AM
0

I hate it when adults of any gender bawl. It's noisy and usually pointless because it doesn't solve their problem. It's also proof of weakness, if it isn't an attempt at manipulating other people's emotion (which is usually the case). The only people I don't ever mind crying (and will comfort) are children, bereaved or sick people.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 11:28 PM
2

How about if people just grow a thicker skin and stop taking everything so serious? One can barely move for all the constantly insulted, difficult unfun people it seems. I hear Obamacare is going to offer free humor transplants, maybe the situation will get better soon :P
/r/MensRights05/12/13 11:18 PM
2

Hello Humpty Dumpty :) I redefine 'Misogyny' to mean chocolate cake. Let's have a big fat slice of yummy misogyny. There, problem solved, lambs silenced.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 10:06 PM
1

Let's count our lucky stars that Bill isn't handing out chastity belts for boys and men to stop them from being HIV carriers in the first place.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 08:50 AM
1

Well, 'purposely creating a deaf child' -- that's no crime, deaf people can a) have their hearing fixed in many cases b) it's not a reason to kill a child. However, social services should long ago have stepped in and remove the child for adoption -- what those 'mothers' are doing is no different to denying a prosthesis to a child born without legs. Disability as a 'Cultural identity' -- what demented rubbish.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 08:45 AM
2

Well, the MRM has some angry freaks too, but certainly not 7000 angry nekkid spitters wanting to storm a cathedral. Let's keep some perspective here -- in feminism, being rabid is mainstream, in the MRM, it's an outlier and usually kept in check by cooler heads.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 08:34 AM
1

Yea, in the same way he had to arrange for a butler, a coolie and a gigolo for his ex :-D
/r/MensRights05/12/13 08:18 AM
1

Those lists will already exist, likewise the pendant of that, because hiring an activist of any kind is always a threat to any company. HR is not stupid and their main job is to protect a company from law suits and anti-social colleagues. Do not take a risk and talk too much to newcomers to your community, engage carefully and be very helpful, make a mental note of their name, then leave the moment the small talk section of an initial meeting is completed. Random sample. Those are normal manners…
/r/MensRights01/12/13 06:54 PM
1

He will still have to pay royalties as the derivate work only gets a small percentage of the takings.
/r/MensRights01/12/13 05:54 PM
0

If you want a child of your own, you can always buy eggs and hire a surrogate, something I would strongly encourage, because sticking a random women with your child is as bad as women predating on unwilling fathers. Besides that, using a surrogate is far cheaper than child support and less damaging to the child who has to deal with two adults that hate each other.
/r/MensRights01/12/13 05:52 PM
3

Seems to have gone swimmingly in favor of MRA and common sense --- what's the problem? Person talks kack & gets flack. (what's not to like?) Seriously, look on those kind of things as an opportunity, we could not ask for easier 'opponents' that help us make it clear what the problem actually is and educate the uninformed into critical thinking.
/r/MensRights16/11/13 10:21 AM
1

One of the more compelling arguments as to why allowing divorce is a bad idea, and why divorce doesn't actually exists in any meaningful way. You still stay married financially (and emotionally if you have children) but now with the added hassle of the court taking sides, meting out bent revenge verdicts and lawyers getting rich on the family money.
/r/MensRights16/11/13 09:59 AM
3

In the UK, the 'value' of your life is calculated as QALYs, and this is used to decide if it's worthwhile treating you on the NHS or letting you suffer/die instead. Also, your question depends on the situation: if the population numbers are down severely, then clearly women of childbearing age are more 'valuable'. If the barbarians are at the gate, young men will be more important, and in a society of mostly young but ignorant people, older men and women who can lead and advise are more worthwhi…
/r/MensRights16/11/13 09:52 AM
1

So, it's the prison guards and judges that rape the prisoners... or other prisoners who presumably get perks for applying the extra-judicial punishment that TPTB ordered them to inflict? Yeah, riiiight. The people who are responsible for the rapes are the rapists, no-one else. Looks, prison rape is awful, and the problem is that it's not punished, not that jails are not cushy enough. Also, prison doesn't magically turn people (of either gender) into homosexuals that suddenly start to rape and to…
/r/MensRights01/11/13 05:19 PM
3

Clearly we just need to stock the prison library with Charles Bronson's excellent how-to stay fit in jail book. "Charlie Bronson has spent three decades in solitary confinement, and yet has stayed as fit as a fiddle, gaining several world strength and fitness records in the process. Now, in this no-nonsense guide to getting fit and staying fit, he reveals just how he's done it. Forget fancy gyms, expensive running shoes and designer outfits, what you need are the facts on what really works and t…
/r/MensRights01/11/13 04:19 PM
0

Oh, I see, women do not rape and torture. Glad to hear that! (and there I was thinking how unfair it is that female criminals get perks that should be urgently removed...)
/r/MensRights01/11/13 04:08 PM
5

They all should wear uniforms for the entire sentence.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 03:44 PM
2

Don't date non-widowed parents, whether their kids live with them or not. 1) They already proven they are not able to hold a family together, what makes you think it'll be different with you? 2) They have children that need them and who will always view you as an intruder(and rightly so). 3) They have a lot of emotional baggage which will affect your relationship. 4) They tend to be financially over committed, and any children you have with them will end up at the back of the queue. 5) You datin…
/r/MensRights01/11/13 02:54 PM
-3

And the women inmates all had dads? Plenty of people who do not murder, rob or beat other people up were brought up in broken families -- being disadvantaged is no excuse at all, ever. Jails need to be made much tougher for both genders, the idea that men's jail should be upgraded because women's jails are joke is a non-starter.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 02:36 PM
4

Uniforms (with hair covering bonnets) should especially apply to females, so there is no in-fighting over clothes.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 01:49 PM
2

Maybe it's time to retire the term 'rape' because it's a clumsy catch-all euphemism for a wide range of sexual assaults that range from 'embarrassing encounter' to 'fatal attack'. What we call the attack doesn't really change the reality of the crime that has actually taken place and we should not allow deniers like David Futrelle to hide behind semantics.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 10:27 AM
1

I suspect that this entire dating in fancy restaurants concept is a marketing ploy by the catering trade, just like DeBeers' vastly overpriced shiny bauble scam. There are many other venues -- what about the local zoo for example? Or visit a museum, a gallery or a fair instead. You get to talk to each other just as well if not better, if you take a long walk together, in fact, this used to be the dating method of choice not so long ago.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 10:08 AM
1

So... are you saying that men are not savvy enough to do this and that it's best left to women? /s
/r/MensRights28/10/13 11:27 AM
1

Nothing wrong with being a prince(ss), think about it, it's actually a nice thing. And the clothes are cool as well. What makes it a problem is that it's become a term for 'selfish anti-social psychopath'. Bad ideas never cause good people to do wrong things, millions of people have watched Disney (or horror films, etc) or played video games without copying the behaviors in real life.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 08:51 PM
1

Just close all the DV shelters (no matter what gender or sexual orientation) and the social worker industry that runs them down. Doubling the meddling business in size and creating even more cushy jobs for social workers is the last thing the world needs. I've never met undeserving players here, and I've had quite a few neighbors who enthusiastically engaged in this 'equal opportunity' hobby. As an iron rule, before there is a fight serious enough to require evacuation of the loser, there usuall…
/r/MensRights26/10/13 03:12 PM
-3

"Especially if all the guys she knows are losers." Sadly so, he has a point here... What he means is that many guys nowadays have been feminised to a point where they look and act like ugly beta girls. And most women despise feminine men (Ye cannae beat the laws of nature), in the same way that lots of men are not all that attracted to manly women. In the meanwhile, having sex with a real girl is less cringing/embarrassing that having sex with a girly boy. Turn the situation around(if you're mal…
/r/MensRights23/10/13 09:52 PM
5

I'm sure that lots of women would quite like this contraption to be invented too... In fact, I have an even better idea: We build this womb machine and then just clone babies, and whilst we're at it, we should alter the genetics to do away with gender in the human race totally. Problems solved!
/r/MensRights23/10/13 03:23 PM
1

On the bright side, at least we can expect a new crop of Radio Eriwan jokes. Although, some of the best old ones will be just as good as new: Q: Is it true that conditions in our labor camps are excellent? A: In principle, yes. Five years ago one of our listeners was not convinced of this, so he was sent to investigate. He seems to have liked it so much that he hasn't returned yet.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 08:54 PM
3

How about just jailing both of them for indecent exposure?
/r/MensRights16/10/13 09:42 PM
1

And there I was, wondering what the gentleman in the niqab was doing taking over my pen and ballot paper in the ballot box at the last election, forcing me vote for the raving monster loony party.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 09:29 PM
1

And boobs are boobs are boobs, even if all that is left of them is implants with nipple tats, or, just hideous scars due to cancer. Men don't care or notice at all, so we might as well scrap the expensive reconstructive surgery and tell the ladies to (ahem) grow a pair.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 07:34 PM
1

It depends whom you ask. For the schools whose business is to not have bad stats, failing pupils are indeed 'the problem.' Teachers are just victims of lazy kids!
/r/MensRights14/10/13 11:40 AM
1

Sounds like the mums are just trying very hard to avoid spending time with their kids (hectic, it is?) --- it's not like they are complaining that the men are not spending time with them, nor is the problem that the toilet is occupied, or, the smell either. In fact, a lot of feminism is more about avoiding unpopular work than it is about rights.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 11:35 AM
4

Looks like she's just sore because her cleaning jutsu isn't good enough to earn the pocket money and it goes to the cleaner instead. Seriously, there are so many male janitors, dishwashers etc, it's ridiculous to suggest that male humans don't (have to) do cleaning. In fact the most house proud people I know are male!
/r/MensRights11/10/13 08:34 PM
1

Yes they would. Sadly so, some people are very ill and the results can be horrendous. As an example, some schizophrenics who end up murdering people whilst delusional happen to be black -- would you seriously suggest that this kind of homicide is a 'black' problem? Of course not. It's a schizophrenia problem.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 08:30 PM
1

In the same way that men's rights is also very relevant to women. Women (often) have male partners, sons, dads, male friends, and daughters who have men they like (and love) in their lives. In fact, mens' rights helps women directly and personally too, because feminists often are not really womens' friends at all. Mens' rights just helps people in general, and improves and civilizes our culture.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 08:24 PM
-5

Whilst I'm against circumcision, I also don't think that reviling rabbis for carrying out an ancient religious rite is the way to go, especially not since winning the argument with Jewish people is made difficult by gratuitous attacks on their religion.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 08:11 PM
0

Hmm...
/r/MensRights08/10/13 11:24 AM
1

What will happen is that a lot of companies will simply put the wives on the payroll, cut the pay of the hubby respectively and save themselves a heap of taxes. And who would accuse them of tax avoidance then, if it's in the name of 'equality'?
/r/MensRights08/10/13 10:55 AM
1

Certain people appear to have the classic witch doctor idea that if they (or their wards) are named by their 'true name', they are being jinxed/cursed by the 'evil eye' of reality. Hence the constant renaming and demands with menaces that only the new, acceptable invocations are used which do not 'upset' them.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 10:52 AM
1

Record your conversation with her. Even if you cannot use them legally, they are a very good way of keeping track of what is going on over time and for going over a stress situation with a calm mind later on. A tiny MP3 player like a Sony Walkman is ideal for this.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 10:45 AM
-1

Giles Corens' wife? Looking at the style of writing... he probably wrote that one as well, his business is writing troll/click bait.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 10:40 AM
3

Germany used to have a special pension age for people (mostly men, but also some women) who worked physically demanding jobs and whose bodies were spent well before the usual pension age. The only 'one solution fits all' is the one that takes individuals and their reality into account.
/r/MensRights05/10/13 10:46 AM
1

That's nearly as good an argument as Augustus made when he introduced the Lex Julia. Women who decide to life child-free get to hear the same arguments, just dressed up differently, usually delivered by the heroic 'have-it-alls' who for some reason feel less well off when they see that others have more freedoms than them. Often the speech is supported up by gory tales of labor of all kinds, and followed up by anger if the target of the rant points out that instant poverty, endless hard work and …
/r/MensRights05/10/13 10:34 AM
16

And this is why you should never ever date people who have children. If they have children living with them, you end up taking someone else's family over, if they pay for children, your new family or relationship will also suffer -- your partner already has a family and your own family/relationship will end up having to make-do with whatever is left emotionally and financially. In some countries, the new spouse will end up liable for supporting the old family, and any new children you have with …
/r/MensRights04/10/13 08:42 AM
7

" She has a Social Works and Human Services major masters," (I think I see your problem...) So, she spent 3 years and tens of thousands of dollars to get to her exalted position of learned crusader, and she sat through the entire curriculum without forming a critical thought. I don't think you can do much to change her now since she is heavily invested and removing this misconception would mean an complete reversal of her life philosophy and everything she's worked for. At best you can start a m…
/r/MensRights03/10/13 01:20 PM
5

Why cast those women as misled, innocent victims without free will who were 'encouraged to perjure themselves'? Better headline: 'Domestic Violence Centers enable predatory false accuser to be more effective liars' instead? No-one who is a decent person can be talked into perjury, but bad people who would not be smart enough to cause harm on their own can certainly be helped by those places.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 01:02 PM
2

No. I want to change things instead.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 12:48 PM
1

No. I want to change things instead.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 12:48 PM
2

The actual problem is that public spaces have been designed for much smaller bodies than most men have. Fat women have exactly the same problem and looking at the feminists pictures in general, it should not be a problem to make a case against fat feminists taking up too much space in public either ... Alternatively, we could just all get together and lobby for bigger seats and spaces in public areas in general, but that would be productive... nah, let's just cram in like battery hens and peck e…
/r/MensRights19/09/13 12:38 PM
1

Yeah, that'll work well, just in the same way the constitution is upheld in the US... and all Americans have the right to bear arms and property rights are respected, and freedom of speech is held in high esteem in liberal universities. Laws are only as good as the government that is elected to uphold them.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 12:25 PM
1

Yes, the definition is completely broken, but feminists are too uneducated to understand this (which is why it's broken in the first place). Discussing the merits of chicken entrails vs. lizard bones with a witchdoctor will never lead to discoveries in modern medicine.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 10:37 AM
1

Congratulations -- you have successfully weeded out a false friend!
/r/MensRights19/09/13 10:19 AM
0

I guess we'll have to admire the feminists' superior sense of logic, fashion and cuisine instead then.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 10:15 AM
6

No. Because then I'd also find out if they have been raped if they were the victim. Rape prosecution is still in the middle ages because it resembles the stocks more than modern justice. Adding yet more barbarity to the already backward is not a recipe for modernity.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 10:53 AM
1

Behold the classic Python overdose... he should have coded in C instead and stayed sane.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 03:58 PM
9

It's useless, I cannot sort majors by gender or vice versa, so it's not clear if more women are being sold junk degree courses or if men are prevented from studying courses that have a professional future and not traditional vocational positions that now require a 'degree' in order to fill university coffers. (note the high number of nursing students...)
/r/MensRights14/09/13 03:12 PM
2

But we're not talking about normal people in healthy relationships but about psychopaths on a power trip wielding food and shame as a weapon to cow others.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 07:51 PM
-1

No, she should not have the right to stunt her own child with vegetarian food. Whilst such kids do not die and often are 'healthy', they will never reach their full physical potential due to the malnutrition. Humans function like any other mammal here -- whatever you deprive them of will stunt them forever later on, and note that it's a common method to keep pets small by starving them (eg, mini pigs etc). It's child abuse on par with genital mutilation, bluntly put.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 06:48 PM
0

It seems to be a common quasi-religious power trip amongst certain women to pester the male members of their family into filling up with virtuous veg whilst restricting their evil meat portions, all under the guise of 'healthy living' and 'compassion'. And now that he escaped the food fascist(I'm pretty sure that animated discussions ad nauseum were had about meat being an vital part of a child's diet...otherwise, why so adamant?), she's holding her son hostage and deliberately stunting him for …
/r/MensRights12/09/13 06:41 PM
1

So, all that happen was that she copied whatever happened in the famous, 1987 film 'Personal Service' That's not 'fraud' or 'exploitation' at all, plenty of customers pay professional dominas to be allowed to clean their house, work their garden etc, and sexual gratification often is not part of the deal either (most dominas do not have sex with clients btw). But thanks for the great laugh, I'm more amazed that in a country where 'kinky sex' is mainstream since 2 decades such blissful innocence …
/r/MensRights11/09/13 01:41 PM
0

I wasn't aware there is a slave market that supplies dangerous professions with conscripts. No doubt these unfortunates would rather have a safe job burger flipping.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 05:50 PM
5

I actually agree with the court intentions -- the kids (and the taxpayer) should not be punished for her crime along with her. Commute the sentence to 10 years jail to be served after the currently youngest child reaches majority -- job done, justice served.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 05:20 PM
2

Strange, no mention of the many women who have huge student debts and a junk degree without job prospects and will not be able to marry due to the inescapable debts that will be toxic for family finances. And in any case, that's the men's fault for not being romantic enough to ignore the reality and avoid guaranteed poverty.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 05:05 PM
1

Maybe you should consider the experience as a hint that every other topic in that course is just as corrupted as the gender topic. The course is designed to teach you how to lie effectively to yourself and everyone else, in order to toe the politically-correct line so you 'fit in', not to make you think for yourself or ask critical questions.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 12:06 PM
1

Next step: lay an egg everyday, or end up in the Soylent Green.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 11:43 AM
4

Recruit more women -- feminism is as oppressive to women as it is to men.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 11:31 PM
0

Free will is just such an outdated concept nowadays, we all are just helpless victims of circumstance.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 11:23 PM
3

Welp, given that all the Roman emperors were married to women, does this mean that you're not gay either -- just bisexual?
/r/MensRights29/08/13 06:15 PM
0

The difference here is that the child of 14 cannot give consent but, the child itself is not doing anything illegal by offering sex -- the adult commits the crime by accepting the offer. However, when the child commits a crime (theft, rape, beatings), then the child is doing something illegal, regardless of the age of culpability. If your child breaks someone's nose(say), it probably will not go to jail, but you (or your insurance) will still be on the hook for the cost, and if there is a crimin…
/r/MensRights29/08/13 06:04 PM
1

That's because you're old enough to have been spared 'sex education' in primary school.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 05:32 PM
1

UK schools have a ranking system... and if the girls suddenly have to produce quality work in the 'hard' subjects to win those A*'s to keep the schools all-important place in the ranks, as this will affect intake and budget. Also, there are not many math and physics teachers available, so, the some random arts, english or sport teacher gets to flail about learning the GCSE math at the same time as the class they are 'teaching' it to. To wit: "Only one third of the teachers tested for a Channel 4…
/r/MensRights26/08/13 04:06 AM
2

Sounds like you need to cut your loss and move on. Anything try to you do will just make things worse, and you're currently looking forward to years of problems you won't be able to fix, and staying around to be the 'target of choice' will just invite more complications and bad situations. It's no different that being serially battered by your partner, just that in this case, children are the weapon instead. Pay whatever money and love you're lost, but do not invest your life into yet more grief…
/r/MensRights24/08/13 11:23 AM
1

If it's any consolation, the prize winner apparently has a younger brother who is just as avid a reader and tipped to take over the competition in the same way(once it's forcibly removed from his older brother). As a side note, little girls that 'do too well' are quite often stopped in the same way, with the same lame reasons.(be nice, let others have a 'chance', how about you teach instead of unfairly studying ahead, etc...) No-one likes a 'swotter' because of 'IQ envy' and because their achiev…
/r/MensRights24/08/13 10:54 AM
1

Well, it's good to see that this particular problem has apparently been resolved.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 01:25 PM
1

Photocopy the hallowed tablet and ask a female friend to keep hanging the flyer up in the womens' toilets.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 08:59 PM
1

Jewelry can give you nasty injuries -- ringed earlobes, noses and eyebrows rip, necklaces strangle, rings can results in losing fingers and so on. So, schools have more than just cultural reasons to ban it and it's probably a condition of the insurance policy as well.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 08:55 PM
1

Jewelry can give you nasty injuries -- ringed earlobes, noses and eyebrows rip, necklaces strangle, rings can results in losing fingers and so on. So, schools have more than just cultural reasons to ban it and it's probably a condition of the insurance policy as well.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 08:55 PM
3

I'm a little puzzled what this says about homosexual marriages... do gay men still need to find wives then in order to do well in life? Do gay men vote less egalitarian and behave less co-operatively due to lack of female 'guidance'?
/r/MensRights19/08/13 08:31 PM
13

The problem is the tipping culture that favors 'pretty' people because the core business for servers is not serving food but generating the most tips. Apparently if the restaurant bans tips the work atmosphere improves greatly. Not sure this is a gender issue, I'm sure that gay establishments have the same problems if they use the same incentives, the way it's set up it's begging to be abused.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 08:16 PM
1

You need to visit /r/sewing :-D Most clothes only look good when they fit and fall properly, and that can only be done for the individual -- very few items will fit perfectly without alternation.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 11:46 PM
0

That looks like it would be a huge shirt... :-D She'd have to put on some weight, or wear it as a long dress!
/r/MensRights08/08/13 07:55 AM
1

OP, meet Mr. Tesla and his reasons to never marry: http://anengineersaspect.blogspot.com/2011/07/nikola-tesla-mr-tesla-explains-why-he.html
/r/MensRights06/08/13 04:38 PM
0

And of course, clever girls are popular with everyone and no-one ever picks on them. And if not(but it really never happens), even then they would not dream of dumbing down to avoid the bullies -- no -- being girls(and not wimpy boys!), they will make adult feminist dreams come true and infect the whole class with intelligence and polite manners and cure the bullies with love, respect and equality.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 09:17 AM
2

Polygamy is oppressive to people in general(regardless of religion), let's not hold a grievance competition here -- it's the few psychopaths that profit from this set up and the decent people that get fleeced. Divorce is a middle eastern invention. Christianity introduced widow marriage in the West, which makes the murder of the spouse a viable option if you wish to 'divorce'. (also see Tacitus for the mores of Europe before Christianity was introduced)
/r/MensRights23/07/13 03:07 PM
0

You're not a feminist then -- equality and feminism are not compatible, and when well-meaning people confuse the two issues, feminists use that to cloak their hate in those people's reasonableness. The second you attempt to leave their plantation and question their motives, you'll find out that they are not 'man-haters' but 'people haters' and that's as far as 'equality' goes for them.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 10:01 PM
3

Of course women don't care. All the female MRA's including GWW are fakes of course! Or, not real women. But what we really need to know is: 'Are all Harrys angry?'
/r/MensRights23/06/13 09:52 PM
1

Nothing much, but do take note that same-sex divorce is as predatory as the regular model. (see the link below and weep)
/r/MensRights23/06/13 09:37 PM
3

Still no reason to give up on the marriage strike...
/r/MensRights23/06/13 08:37 PM
1

Feminists also claim a monopoly on defining womenhood, and woe to the women who disagrees with them...
/r/MensRights23/06/13 08:32 PM
1

Most of London's homeless are immigrant men who arrived without their families hoping to bring them to the UK once they have settled. British homeless have been pushed out from shelters(the very few that there are), begging pitches and also, the Big Issue sales pitches and out of London. So, whilst the author has a (small) point, his statistics are skewed, in this situation, by definition, the 'homeless' migrants (who left their homes voluntary) are always going to be males in the majority. Btw,…
/r/MensRights23/06/13 08:16 PM
3

Best of all, boys feeling bad about this will be femsplained by feminists as a throwback of male entitlement(and proof of general male uselessness) and thus being a healthy education towards true gender neutrality, to start them off 'on the right way' when young.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 11:34 PM
4

So... the dad gets to deal with his rapist on a regular basis if he wants visitation rights and provide fathering for his child, and his kid is going to be brought up by a proven kiddie fiddler...
/r/MensRights20/06/13 11:26 PM
1

I don't see why either a charity or the government should be involved in housing people. If someone is incapacitated, the clearly they need to be kept safe, but anyone ambulant and over 21 should really be able to take care of themselves. And it's not like a cheap hotel or hostel is that expensive, a backpacker hotel costs around $30 and is probably better quality than a shelter place.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 08:42 PM
5

"I want to let it work. I think we owe it to everybody," said Army Maj. Gen. Bennet Sacolick, the director of force management and development for the U.S. Special Operations Command. Sacolick said he wanted to be "an honest broker" and raised more overall caution than the other officers. "I just want to see what happens," he said." ...we already know what kind of horror will happen: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1349248/Mutiny-board-German-sailing-ship-female-recruit-plunges-100ft-dea…
/r/MensRights19/06/13 01:14 AM
1

It's an Endorphin addiction/mental problem and attaching a hierarchy of who has it worse or is more worthy of help is not useful at all. It's the same lame discussion as to whether we should bother treating smokers (when there is already a long waiting list) or if we should exclude car drivers and sports people from treatment for their (self-inflicted) accidents, or whether alcoholics should get replacement livers.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 12:34 AM
5

Most of the female preening that goes on is aimed at other women, not at men -- it's a status symbol and women ogle each other quite openly (and often not in an admiring, but competitive way) The old joke about 'he never notices anything!' is quite true, most men don't care (or even know) if it's Prada or Primark, as long as it's not absolutely hideous (and put on within a reasonable amount of time...) So no, it's not odd, but quite predicable.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 11:45 PM
2

There is not one group of people who get decent service from the NHS. The NHS kills a lot of people with negligence, rationing and general callousness. Dying of dehydration in an NHS hospital is not uncommon, patients have been left to starve to death on many occasions, or relatives find that 'Do Not Resuscitate' orders are left in people's notes without any discussion about this taking place, or this even being necessary. NHS is actually short for 'National Holocaust Service'...
/r/MensRights18/06/13 11:21 PM
1

The 'lady' has a holier-than-thou messias complex. Unless you're a qualified shrink and can charge by the hour for listening to her delusions, I'd say it's not worth bothering.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 08:19 PM
1

You're just being skeptical about the information that is sold to you here and you are attempting to form your own opinion instead of mindlessly swallowing the officially sanctioned guff. In fact, your attitude goes a long way towards eliminating any cognitive bias that you may fall victim to.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 08:17 PM
2

Why do we need shelters in the first place? (for men or women...) Why can't adults simply use a cheap hotel instead, but expect 'the community' to give them a free accommodation? The only freebies I would offer is basic legal advice, and help from the cops to retrieve needed items. And I'd like to see a much fairer family court system too. But please don't call such people 'victims'. The only victims here are the kids, neighbors, pets and the tax payer, who is on the hook for shelters', kids hom…
/r/MensRights16/06/13 03:28 PM
-9

Why should another couple pay for your mistake? It's enough that they do the job you're shirking, why should you breed for free and produce Cuckoo kids? And, with this way of doing things, the number of abandoned children will be very small too. The idea is to poison this kind of 'mistake' in such a way that abandonment, murder and extortion is no longer a possibility. Your comfort as the guilty adult who needless brought this situation about is really not important here. Edit: and keeping a chi…
/r/MensRights13/06/13 01:51 PM
-20

You forgot the child's interests (and human rights) in this equation. For a child, the best solution in this situation is to be adopted out by a couple, and both birth parents should be paying alimony, by way of paying compensation for abandoning their kid this way.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 09:45 AM
1

The entire problem is that one solution is applied to every case, no matter what the story. This guy got seriously ripped off here, but the same can be said for a house person (men will be in the same bad position) who spent 30 years running a home and ends up in similar poverty because the working spouse swans off to a new life and leaves their partner destitute. Neither is acceptable and the crux of the problem is 'no fault divorce'.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 09:32 AM
1

Article could have stopped at point c), because that's the point where it's obvious that you have issues. For the rest of the article, well, as the old Eagles song goes... "Victim of love, I see a broken heart You got your stories to tell Victim of love, it's such an easy part And you know how to play it so well "
/r/MensRights13/06/13 09:19 AM
1

How curious! Aren't men supposed to be slavering dogs who ogle every scantily clad women in sight?
/r/MensRights12/06/13 10:04 AM
2

I think they should demand that a codpiece is added to the design for skirts and trousers of any lengths, and that fake mustaches are mandatory(full beard optional). Could add loud hooker make-up, to 'degender' the outfit for complete equality! Should look very fetching and fashionable, let's brighten up the bus service!
/r/MensRights09/06/13 11:34 PM
2

In most cultures, skirts are women's clothes. Note that drivers of public transport tend to meet people of many cultures and having a lot of customers think you're a weird freak (according to their value system, which you better not question since all cultures are equal...) is not really a comfortable work environment either.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 11:28 PM
-1

What about the men who'd like to 'self-express' by wearing shorts instead of a skirt? But of course, that doesn't break your heart, eh? (and why do you think that the uniform is scheduled to be reassessed? I'm pretty sure the blokes will not ask for an upgrade to a pencil skirt...)
/r/MensRights09/06/13 11:22 PM
-4

So, let me get that straight, I'm a homophobe because I think men should not be forced to wear skirts? And men wearing skirts on pain of overheating because shorts 'look messy' and thus are not permitted is a step towards equality?
/r/MensRights09/06/13 11:14 PM
-4

The issue is the being forced to wear certain garments. Not the freedom to wear them.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 11:07 PM
0

If you want to wear a skirt -- who cares? But don't try and sell that as something most other men want to do and that forcing them to put up with this is ok, because you happen to like skirts.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 11:05 PM
-2

Only if they also can choose wear shorts. The option to wear long trousers (and suffer) or a skirt is simply abusive. Don't try and sell blackmail as 'choice' please.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 11:02 PM
-7

Behold the 'you didn't read the article' and the 'but he enjoyed being violated' argument, plus the 'abused men look cute!' quip. Quality! Men don't enjoy wearing drag, in the same way that most women do no enjoy wearing a burka. Why inflict this kind of abuse in the first place? How about the idea that our equal, tolerant and enlightened society could actually just have sensible rules that don't damage people's health and sensitivities?
/r/MensRights09/06/13 07:16 PM
74

So, forcing men to a) overheat [1] or b) quit their job or c) go to work in drag is not a mens rights issue? ahem [1] there are reproductive rights issues (overheating testicles makes men temporarily sterile) and other assorted health issues involved here -- quite apart from the question of how safe is a driver who is working in such a hot environment that is close to heat stroke territory?
/r/MensRights09/06/13 04:26 PM
1

"How many mean words can one partner hurl at the other, and how mean can those words be, before they rise to the level of abuse?" Someone who doesn't respect you or likes you isn't someone you want to associate with, and those situations always get worse. What you see is what you get. So, the answer to 'how many' is 'zero' and the solution is to leave before you get into a situation where you get abused (or start abusing in retaliation) and become a liability for the community who then has to pa…
/r/MensRights08/06/13 12:23 PM
0

So, the 'don't ask, don't tell' doctrine has merely shifted then, from perps to victims... ... and the authorities are doing their best to aiding and abetting rapists to keep raping men. (you don't think that they stop after their first exploit no?)
/r/MensRights08/06/13 12:02 PM
1

Neither problem has an easy solution for the majority of people -- fat people are most likely to stay fat no matter how many diets they inflict on themselves, and mentally ill people tend to not be curable either, at best their illness can be controlled with medication, but in many cases that is not possible. Help is only useful if it actually helps, otherwise, it's a waste of time and money, and in the case of fat people, often the attempt to cure adds more physical and mental damage.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 11:36 AM
2

In general, you cannot cure crazy people with logic, the best anyone can do is to limit their ability to disrupt the rest of the world, which appears to be happening quite effectively in this case. Regard the debating boycott, I don't think much is lost here -- anyone lightweight enough to boycott isn't going to be worth debating anyway.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 12:10 AM
2

... women are bitches. :-D
/r/MensRights06/06/13 02:41 PM
1

Looks a bit like the PUA rating system, so, there is your reverse article. In other news: humanity contains a large percentage of sociopaths most of which are annoying people.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 02:38 PM
3

The child has a right (and medical need) to know who the genetic parents are. Which incidentally trumps the privacy rights of the parents, because their pride is not as important as the child's health (and that of the grandchildren). Consider: what if your daughter is a carrier for Hemophilia because you cheated. Or what if she has inherited BRCA2 from your 'adventure' -- your silence will kill her. And so on. So, yes, mandatory DNA testing at birth is the right thing to do.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 02:27 PM
1

So, a man cheating on a women is a women's rights issue? In fact, with this broad definition, is there anything left to talk about that isn't mens rights or women's rights issues?
/r/MensRights06/06/13 02:21 PM
2

... and if you buy faulty Y-fronts you'll post a complaint here too?
/r/MensRights06/06/13 02:20 PM
2

"How do I keep from going crazy in my personal life, dating life, and now even my work life? I try to ignore it, and believe what I believe is true internally, but it's not easy." Actually it is easier, because it's fairly clear who is not worth bothering with. All those people would not be much nicer if feminism didn't exist, and if they had better manners, avoiding them would be difficult and you'd end up finding out just what they are, the hard way. Fortunately, feminism has done away with th…
/r/MensRights05/06/13 02:13 PM
1

Just as well they were all women, imagine if it was men (...) Incidentally, the reason this post isn't going anywhere is that it goes against some of the MRA's stance that women should be equal and go to work, instead of leeching and loafing at home looking after their toddlers. Then again, just as well, because if the MRA's would make the point that a small child needs their mother 24/7 and that going to work instead of raising your toddler is child abuse, the feminists would have a field day. …
/r/MensRights30/05/13 05:05 PM
5

I hate to burst your bubble, but, a single mother in the UK makes more from the state than most men can bring in, so the idea that women need a man to afford a family is a red herring(onna bike!). Also, whatever the guy pays in alimony is taken off the bennies, and so, our prospective gold diggers would have to ensnare a top earner (60k+) before this kind of calculation pays off. It would be nice if there really was a gaggle of frustrated broody feminists out there but if this was so, there woul…
/r/MensRights28/05/13 02:17 PM
1

In other words: a lot of men like marriage so much they keep trying more than once, but most women only need one lesson of that sort.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 04:22 PM
1

Great! It means that a lot of people will visit r/mensrights who otherwise wouldn't and find that actually, it's the opposite to what they were told it was and decide to get involved in the MR movement because it's the decent thing to do. Nothing wakes people up more than finding out for themselves that they have been brainwashed and lied to by people and organizations they always assumed to be the 'good guys'.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 04:07 PM
0

I don't think you need to be female to take offense at kiddie porn being studied in a school. Where do we draw the line -- perhaps at kids 'studying' the Kama Sutra in art class?
/r/MensRights27/05/13 03:16 PM
5

... and shops should quit selling lewd ladies' knickers, along with all the other skimpy tart tents that they sell. And, asparagus! Not only does it -look- suggestively rapey, it also is nature's viagra. Maybe the feminists should team up with the Sharia fans in Iran who demanded that women must be banned from purchasing offensive genitalia shaped vegetables like cucumbers, carrots and aubergines...
/r/MensRights27/05/13 02:58 PM
5

Maybe a few ladies are put off by not finding the right prince. Maybe feminists would be nice people who'd be great to marry if only there was no feminism that misleads the poor dears into hating themselves and the rest of the world(but I doubt it...). But most child-free women consider having to go to work AND bringing up a child at the same time, the horrible state nurseries and state schools, plus the poverty and much reduced ability to take part in social life that parenthood confers and dec…
/r/MensRights26/05/13 03:06 PM
2

You could equally well ask at which point we can claim that society doesn't have any unreasonable prejudices. Or you could wonder how long a piece of string is.
/r/MensRights26/05/13 02:37 PM
2

Just a modern version of the classic frog & scorpion tale.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 05:54 PM
4

So, female rape victims having orgasms (quite common) means it wasn't actually rape because they 'enjoyed' it?
/r/MensRights25/05/13 05:47 PM
2

No, especially this isn't a problem at all. If our male and female sociopath stay single eating grass and burning bras instead of bringing up maladjusted children and making everyone around them miserable, it's a win for society in the long term and hopefully the few next generations will have a much smaller percentage of badly socialized people.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 05:39 PM
1

Well, whatever anyone thinks or says, reality is that unprotected sex sometimes produces children, abortions or gives you the drug resistant clap. It's like walking on the zebra crossing and getting run over -- it's not fair or legal, but all the same, no amount of compensation will undo getting mangled or killed. The problem is that alimony is as wrong as single motherhood and the one person who suffers most is the child. We could fix the entire issue comprehensively by making both birth parent…
/r/MensRights23/05/13 05:01 PM
1

Yes, the law is bad. So let's work to change it. But we're not getting it changed by demanding that the stupid rules are applied instead of tossed out.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 04:38 PM
1

At least they have a better slogan in English. In Germany, the slogan used to be 'Gillette -- the best (thing) in the man'. Btw, the ad looks like it is aimed at women to entice them to buy those shavers as 'presents'. I guess itchy sandpaper chests are all the rage these days...
/r/MensRights23/05/13 04:36 PM
0

Feminists to men: be REAL man. Feminists to women: STOP being a REAL female. ;-D
/r/MensRights23/05/13 03:29 PM
1

Are you upset because they are offering a service you can't use or because they do not offer the kind of service you're looking for? One thing you can do however, is to ring them up, and offer to book your conference with them if they lay on slippers(unused!), web cams and a proper wet shaving equipment on a secure floor for your crowd.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 03:27 PM
10

I predict that sometime soon, her blog will be named 'ex-feminist' :) Atta girl!
/r/MensRights14/05/13 02:40 PM
3

What kind of degrees are they? STEM? Or, media studies, women studies and other weird-wonderful soft degrees that rarely pay for themselves? Universities are businesses that live by running cheap courses that do not have high lab costs. So, it's reasonable to claim that the medium tier universities will have unlimited places available for anyone who can get a student loan, regardless of their academic ability. So, it's most likely not a case of men being excluded, but that they know a bad deal w…
/r/MensRights14/05/13 02:37 PM
1

Most of the people on that blog sounds quite unhinged, I'm not sure that any kind of reasoning will help them in any way...
/r/MensRights13/05/13 03:13 PM
1

How old is your mom? Because that sounds like a mid-life crisis issue... That said, feminism and other bad ideas do not 'infect' innocent people and turn them into hate zombies, but simply bring out the hatred that has been there all along, via the 'simple solutions' they offer. Given that your mom is a mature adult and not a young person whose views and ability to discern facts are still forming, you are probably fighting a lost cause here. It's probably best to flat-out refuse discussing (or l…
/r/MensRights13/05/13 12:29 PM
-4

I think we should mandate that only charities who run parties with free pizza and beer get to collect and spend money. All this waste of free money on cancers, dogs, cats, children, helplines and famines should stop, it just takes money away from parties!
/r/MensRights12/05/13 11:22 PM
6

Always follow the money... Edit for excerpt: 1: Fosterers typically £400/ week per child! 2: Special children's homes typically £7,000/ week per child! 3: Lawyers and court costs typically £500,000 per case! 4: Experts typically £28,000 for a simple report! 5: Adoption and fostering agencies make £millions (£27,000/placement) 6: Local authority agencies get £13,000 per placement
/r/MensRights12/05/13 10:18 AM
1

Well, there is gay marriage for you now and -- and as people are finding out, gay ex-hubbies and wives are just as greedy as straights the second they have an opportunity to bleed their old squeezes dry.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 12:49 PM
2

You're making the classic mistake here with your attempt to make their fascist behavior less worse by hoping that they don't understand what they are spouting, and that people who post nasty material are not really nasty, but some misguided dears who are otherwise nice, who must be rescued from themselves. People tend to continue as they start in life, and when you see that, you know you're going to see much more of the same, if you care to hang around and victimize yourself in this way.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 04:37 PM
8

No, but have you seen what a lot of the women guards in the concentration camps did to prisoners? If that is not to your liking, there is any number of vile women out there (lots of serial murderers etc) you can use to guilt trip the gullible with guilt by association. (If you can bothered with that sort of thing. It's probably more efficient to just avoid talking to idiots.)
/r/MensRights09/05/13 04:17 PM
1

Feminists let women do whatever they want in life, as long as it's not being a normal women. Do not make the mistake to think that feminists actually like women -- if they could, they'd neuter everyone at birth.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 01:48 PM
1

I see someone posting on reddit trying to tell other people how to spend their time and money.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 10:43 AM
7

Yes, there are, and we generally call them 'confused people'.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 12:33 PM
0

I was just going to post the same complaint about that biased site called 'avoiceformalestudents.com'. They have only articles about men there! scandalous (just kidding. But yours is a silly complaint, I'm sure you don't like being told what to write about, and, Huffington Post College doesn't either. And, that is a good thing.)
/r/MensRights03/05/13 08:18 AM
1

Looks more like a futile attempt to redefine feminism.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 09:48 PM
1

So, what will happen when a lesbian or a homosexual man wants to check on their partner's history?
/r/MensRights01/05/13 10:50 AM
1

They accuse people of 'privilege' because it puts people on the back foot by insinuating that they have/did/are something to be ashamed of. Counter it by calling them out for trying to browbeat you there and then, they are bullying you and not attempting to discuss with you as an equal.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 10:38 AM
2

Never mind the parents and their antics -- the child has a right to know, and given the advances in medicine, it's more than just an emotional need, it may one day save both their lives.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 10:31 AM
-3

Well, having been a neighbor to such couples... I don't have much sympathy for people who play this game with each other. Plain and simple, if your partner hits you the first time, there usually was a build up to this that you should have take note of, and if you don't leave before and even after the hate gets to fisticuff level, then no-one really can help you. No-one can turn the unhinged violent person you chose to play with into the sane, wonderful person you wish they were. You're not a vic…
/r/MensRights01/05/13 10:16 AM
1

Modern fashions don't help here, unless you are slim, whatever gender you are, you look like a stuffed sausage with every blemish on full display if you are overweight, no matter what style (of sameness) you choose. It's practical garb but very rarely elegant, and it's no surprise that a lot of people get body issues.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 10:54 PM
1

Don't be too surprised if in a few days time, he'll go back to her. Be sure that he does the steps necessary himself for himself(help, but do not lead on, he must find his own way here), and that you don't just provide a strategic temporary bolt hole/prop for the currently losing player in a long game of tit-for-tat. Help once, maybe twice, but never more than that and be very clear about that. Also, don't take his side too much, he has a stake of how he got into this position and why he gave up…
/r/MensRights29/04/13 10:56 AM
0

I'm surprised the feminists are against the idea btw, because their enemy Nr. 1 is the SAHM, and that measure will be an effective way of 'liberating' SAHMs (whether they want it or not). The law will only affect traditional marriages(aka, the 'patriarchy'), and also ensure that as few children as possible are raised outside of the state nursery system. Another consequence will be that more men will find that mom simply hands him the house keys and swans off to her new liberated future as a work…
/r/MensRights24/04/13 01:19 PM
9

Gender seperated gyms are fine, and should exist for those who prefer them. What's not ok is if one gender subsidizes the other's extra hours, or if the exclusive hours are set into prime time which block working people of either gender from using the gym (or swimming pools, for example, Saturday morning with your kids, etc) It's all not a problem unless people deliberately decide make it one.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 09:47 PM
1

Why do people assume that men 'enjoy' arranged marriages and being railroaded into marrying a stranger and that only women are victims here? And in this case, women did the murdering, being 'expendable' because they are widows, in others cases, the youngest members of the family are selected as murderers, because they will get 'time off' jail sentences for being a juvenile. But it's usually the entire family that decides that their honor was infringed, together with the community that will make …
/r/MensRights21/04/13 04:55 PM
1

Dealing the the issues by avoiding them is not 'socially adapting' it's accepting the status quo as impossible to change and giving in. It's certainly not 'retaliation' at all, just the best that can be made out of a bad situation for an individual, and it's not really a substitute for the real thing either and in the end, it's as destructive as the feminism that drives men into the loner destiny without the family they actually wanted in life. And this is exactly the problem: men used to make t…
/r/MensRights21/04/13 03:48 PM
-1

Yeah, it needs to change. Like, posts like yours shouldn't appear because they are a complete waste of time. Go and 'community organize' elsewhere...
/r/MensRights20/04/13 04:26 PM
2

Well, here are the figures for option (3) (which is the most common alternative) just to give you a dimension of the sums involved: From http://www.forced-adoption.com/guestbook.asp: "Here at last is PROOF that many of those concerned in "child protection" are receiving vast sums of money. 1: Fosterers typically £400/ week per child! 2: Special children's homes typically £7,000/ week per child! 3: Lawyers and court costs typically £500,000 per case! 4: Experts typically £28,000 for a simple repo…
/r/MensRights15/04/13 02:52 PM
13

Yes -- cot death That said, jailing an innocent woman does not make the lot of innocently jailed men any better.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 02:31 PM
0

I don't think there should be shelters for anyone(other than cats and dogs), it's a complete waste of time and money. DV doesn't happen out of the blue, it tends to build up for quite a while before that and there never is an innocent (or reasonable) party, it's just a matter which of these idiots will explode first. (Long suffering neighbor here, I keep picking houses next to eager hatebirds it seems sigh) And it's not so hard for an adult to go to a hotel (the world does not owe you a living!)…
/r/MensRights15/04/13 01:17 AM
0

So, you're saying that Hooters and other places like strip clubs should start hiring dudes or fat old crones, all in the name of equality?
/r/MensRights15/04/13 12:52 AM
-8

So, her kids should be punished too? And the tax payer twice at the same time as well? It costs 200k a year per child in care in the UK, and the results are rather dire too, it's the worst start in life anyone can have. This is why mothers tend to get spared jail because it's the least destructive choice the judges have. What we need is deferred sentences for when her last child is emancipated.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 12:45 AM
3

Personal insults or overly touchiness is usually a clear sign that your conversation partner is not quite with it and that it's time to end the meeting. There is no arguing with such people either btw, it's a complete waste of time -- as you found out to your cost. If you get completely cornered (and some of these people are quite obsessed and intense when they get going) one emergency exit that always works is to develop a headache, and make your excuses and leave. You lose the party, but that …
/r/MensRights15/04/13 12:32 AM
0

I'd say it looks pretty bad, but only for the perps and their sympathizers. To everyone else, they know exactly what they are looking at, they know it not only looks bad, but also is bad, and that's why it's here and it's why they are looking. It's about the only way of making that gross collection of human debris 'look right' there is...
/r/MensRights13/04/13 04:10 PM
1

But those women are criminals and bigots. Are you saying the world is a better place if we do not know the truth? Do you really believe that bad things will not occur and if they do, they'll unhappen if only we shut up about it and pretend it never happened?
/r/MensRights13/04/13 03:55 PM
5

Who died and left you God?
/r/MensRights13/04/13 03:13 PM
1

Nope. It doesn't matter who owns the house, the accused will be removed from it.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 02:51 PM
2

This will keep happening as long as people pick their partners by what they think is 'good looks' and then try to nag the personality they hoped for into existence. Sadly so, whilst you can buy looks relatively from the gym, the tailor and the surgeon, no-one will sell you a soul for the empty head you picked as your 'partner'...
/r/MensRights13/04/13 01:49 PM
4

Child-free people have their best years and much disposable income to spend on an extended youth instead of wasting time and resources on kids that are unlikely to hang around as adults. There is no rational benefit for adults in having children nowadays, unless you really like kids and don't mind the effort, risk and costs. OP article is correct, parents are normally more 'mature' than child-free people, that is, mature as in stressed, tired, impoverished and well chained to the treadmill of pr…
/r/MensRights11/04/13 06:04 PM
2

Random mad woman beating random man for random reason: not a MRA topic. Women not getting punished for crimes as a matter of policy: definite MRA topic.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 12:32 PM
3

Because it's an efficient form of sexuality control -- a semi-neutered male will have a diminished sexuality and a fundamentally very different experience of that part of manhood, and feminist think this will be less 'threatening' -- in essence, it's the feminization of men that feminists champion. If it's any consolation, it's also usually women who argue for FGM(and also carry it out), because they think it controls women's sex drive.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 12:23 PM
11

Priceless :) "Johnson contrasts CCV with "patriarchal terrorism" (PT), a more unilateral form of domestic violence in which a husband engages in a chronic pattern of serious abuse to control a wife, who does not reciprocate with physical aggression." So, let's reword that: "Tusse contrasts CCV with "feminist terrorism" (FT), a more unilateral form of domestic violence in which a wife engages in a chronic pattern of serious abuse to control a husband who does not reciprocate with physical aggress…
/r/MensRights07/04/13 08:42 AM
-6

Not really, because leftism tends to be somewhat totalitarian and is more akin to religion than actual politics and any productive discussion will not be tolerated, because, it could introduce unwanted reality.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 08:32 AM
1

She's already lost or abandoned the dad of her family. Either he or she was a bad choice, or probably both of them. So what makes you think that it will be different for you? That's another man's family and will be until the kids are grown. The kids probably already had enough problems, and adding more adults (serially often) just makes it worse. Note that the same also holds with dads. Never date parents of underage children, once people have kids, they made their choice in life already, and an…
/r/MensRights07/04/13 08:22 AM
4

He is being ironic. Longer explanation is here
/r/MensRights07/04/13 01:11 AM
5

"Feminism is a movement which seeks to grant women rights and privileges equal to those of men." If that was true, it would be called 'egalitarianism'. Feminism doesn't care about the rights of the wrong kind of women either btw...
/r/MensRights07/04/13 01:08 AM
-2

If you couldn't be bothered to set up a proper 'nest' with a carefully picked mate, you're not parent material in the first place. "Each year more than 20,000 children age out of the foster care without being adopted. Today there are 104,000 children in foster care waiting to be adopted ranging in age from less than a year old to 21." And most of those children are not babies but older kids who often are too much of a challenge to adopt because their childhood has been horrendous. Most of this c…
/r/MensRights02/04/13 02:55 PM
1

It's a good principle in general to only get involved in a fight if one person cannot run away, but wants to. Any other fight is a voluntary affair and best enjoyed from a safe distance.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 12:50 PM
3

That's true for almost everyone of any gender, it's really rare for mismatches here to work out over time. In other news, couch potatoes and fitness fanatics also are unlikely to enter relationships. It can happen, but, it's very unlikely.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 06:48 PM
4

That's a bit radical -- there are quite a few lady MRAs that are popular here, check them out :)
/r/MensRights27/03/13 08:27 PM
3

"And, you guessed it, if a woman thinks you're harassing her, she'll wave the CoC in your face." Priceless :-D "Can we move some conferences to Saudi Arabia and make them "men only?" Well, that'll be accessible to straight men only and you could not come, so, NO :) :) :)
/r/MensRights27/03/13 02:54 PM
2

130k isn't a huge amount, and it's easily mopped up if enough female MRAs join them(there is money in it!). Male MRAs can join too, subject to dressing up in drag: "The Ada Initiative uses an inclusive definition of the word “women” in “supporting women in open technology and culture.” We specifically include and welcome trans women. We warmly invite anyone who identifies as a woman to all events or programs for women run by the Ada Initiative. We also specifically support genderqueer women, wo…
/r/MensRights27/03/13 01:55 PM
-9

Sounds like the two of you were a perfect match... :-D Let's just hope the outrageous tale of the two of you messing each other up comprehensively gets round so that normal people can avoid both of you.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 01:16 PM
2

Don a skirt, claim you identify as 'female', gatecrash the event and be sure to take your time talking to people. And of course, it's all in the best possible taste! (I'm not joking. 20 guys in drag looking for jobs would be an awesome way of showing those segregationists up!)
/r/MensRights27/03/13 01:04 PM
2

The women in IT problem is a real issue, but not as the feminist activists put it. In fact, the concern trolls (like the activist who just poisoned pycon in her bid to become rich and famous) ADD to the problem -- they make people scared of each other and turn everyone into a threat on say-so. But, are those people poisonous because they are feminists/hippies/religious/political/etc or because they are unmannered, predatory assholes? I think that bad ideas do not poison good people, but bad peop…
/r/MensRights26/03/13 10:21 AM
1

Well, the problem is that you create a child with a women who is a bad choice in the first place. You do have reason to complain, but, spare a moment of thought for the poor person who gets that kind of women as a mom and you as a dad. No amount of money will make good not having a family but crazy adults as parents. So, maybe we should instead ask: What will it take for men to stop gifting babies to predators who use them as a meal ticket?. Because right now, not even the financial death penalt…
/r/MensRights23/03/13 06:39 PM
0

So,you're saying that everything should cost the same for everyone regardless of what it costs? You want to compel a business to run things your way? Fine. Go an open up an insurance and show us all how it's done, without going bankrupt or making your other customers pay over the odds because you decided to 'share' the bad risk among them without charging what it really costs. YSK that men's annuities that have been cut because of equality, despite men dying earlier, using your exact reasoning: …
/r/MensRights14/03/13 08:24 AM
2

Actually, the real problem is that neither men or women should have 'rights' but that the kids they produce should have them instead and both parents should be on the hook in the same way that only men are now.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 08:14 AM
3

If I understand it correctly, it's a 'formality' -- he isn't expected to sleep with her and she doesn't have control over his life, nor does he have a good chance of dying in childbirth because he is too young to give birth. It doesn't mirror the situation of child brides at all. Just a community role playing event -- any excuse for a party!
/r/MensRights14/03/13 08:11 AM
-5

Nothing stops you from opening up a web dev business that gives discounts to men whilst charging full admission to students and women. Quit griping about other people's way of doing things -- start being a player yourself, instead of a grumpy spectator.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 08:02 AM
1

Read [Chesterton's book.] (http://www.cse.dmu.ac.uk/~mward/gkc/books/divorce.txt) and think of how many of his predictions have come to pass (he wrote this when divorce was yet illegal in the West).
/r/MensRights06/03/13 01:09 PM
1

Yeah, no-one should ever be a house person. Far better if were all worker drones paying taxes who stay being independent singles even if we are married. In fact, we should make bringing up kids at home illegal and draft those lazy, useless, sponging house persons for national service.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 12:45 PM
2

Nazis and communist would tell you exactly the same: "The idea is great, but the people who executed it last time didn't get it right and they were evil, so they corrupted the purpose." If the idea is bad (and feminism is bad because it builds by destroying, instead of adding) then people who support it are bad. (Nazism did many things that were good. However, no amount of good things achieved will ever eradicate the bad things it caused and it will never be rehabilitated as long as humanity has…
/r/MensRights18/02/13 10:00 AM
1

Feminism is only one of many bad ideas that float around -- but it's not the idea that corrupts innocent people but bad people who use a nasty idea as a tool to get their way. If feminism didn't exist, those people would still be just as bad.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 09:48 AM
1

She told you the truth -- if you want anything in life, you have to organise it for yourself. You wouldn't demand from a hedgehog charity that they start to sponsor foxes, no? Gave any money lately to good causes? Why not support the MRA instead? Check out the sidebar here, and if you don't like what you see, make your own charity!
/r/MensRights18/02/13 09:25 AM
2

Oh, what a nice crab bucket party!
/r/MensRights17/02/13 11:14 AM
21

Because the child is not a free actor and cannot yet protect itself. It's the main reason why we do not have small children live ferally on the streets like many other countries do.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 12:14 PM
34

The problem is not the child support, but that the baby (including it's money) is left in the care of the rapist. What should happen is that the dad has first dibs on the baby (and any money she has available for CS) and if he doesn't want to raise it he should be free to put the child up for adoption.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 12:06 PM
2

Ok, what should we call what happened to you instead? And how long will it take until someone gets upset about the new official term and demands that everyone changes their language on pain of jail time for 'discrimination'?
/r/MensRights13/02/13 10:54 PM
2

This happens all over the place, a lot of kids actually don't give a toss about their parents (actual or adopted). The guy hasn't really lost anything other than his illusions and 3 leeches.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 04:03 PM
0

The court was quite correct here and chose the least worst outcome possible. Also this was the higher court, and so, their judgement is also gong to be a blueprint for future decisions of that kind, so the decision has to not only be fair, but also logically consistent and hold across a number of scenarios of this kind. First of all, let's consider the sum that is involved: 18 years52 weeks 50 euro (say) = 46800 Euro, in this case this sum times 3, so, all in all 150.000 euro. Not exactly small …
/r/MensRights05/02/13 11:48 AM
1

Yeah, who cares about why racists are racists, they don't mean it, really, they are nice people when they are not busy hating, and actually it's not their twisted, sick personality that is rotten, but some evil ideology that has forced themselves on their innocent, pristine souls. If we ignore their broken morals, they are sure to turn into wonderful people, eventually -- just humour them and agree long enough with them and give them all that they want... and they'll come ROUND.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 02:36 PM
1

So, it's ok to bully someone into undressing in school (of all places) as long as they appear to be 'ok' with it? Somehow I do not see this as a valid 'defense'. Nor can I think of any person (male, female or other) who would not have a problem with being treated like that -- think about it. If they really were like that, they would have more problems than just rapey classmates... :(
/r/MensRights02/02/13 08:31 PM
2

NO thanks, I can think and decide for myself.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 01:25 PM
0

But he is right -- IF you can find a great partner for life, then everything he claims is true, and then some. The problem is the 'if* but then again, no matter what gender or sexual orientation, everyone has this problem...
/r/MensRights30/01/13 08:03 PM
1

... and guns shoot people, if we ban them, no-one will ever be murdered again.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 02:11 AM
1

The alternative would be a cab-ranking system... but we'd probably have to fine people who don't turn up for the date with a random cougar or beerbelly to make it work. Alternatively, maybe short men can work the same angle that got the women the free contraceptives and demand leg lenghtening ops to achieve equality?
/r/MensRights30/01/13 12:07 AM
3

I don't quite understand why anyone is desperate to 'deserve a chance' with shrews who log into (and believe) in malicious gossip sites...? typhonblue's app idea sounds like a winner!
/r/MensRights29/01/13 11:20 PM
14

If jobsworths ask you stupid stuff trying to embarrass you in public, one way of sharing the shame is to tell them you're recently hearing impaired and you need them to SPEAK UP (ie, so that everyone hears and notices), then beam a helful and co-operative smile and use the socratic method to get them to explain (LOUDLY) in detail to everyone just what kind of stupidty they wish to celebrate here today. You'll most likely still end up having to accommodate them, but if you're lucky, you'll have a…
/r/MensRights28/01/13 03:24 PM
1

In other news, women are whacking themselves with hammers and cutting themselves with saws, in an attempt to feel the pain of male workplace accidents.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 07:19 PM
1

Is that similiar to nazis actually being democratic freedom lovers underneath that grim masquerade?
/r/MensRights26/01/13 12:34 PM
1

Some people read way too much into The Ballad of Halo Jones...
/r/MensRights25/01/13 03:21 AM
4

What was that?
/r/MensRights25/01/13 03:12 AM
1

Time to give those nice, misguided people regular calls and interview them at length about their ideas on how to help men who suffer from DV and the women who inflict it. Don't write letters. Make them talk to you on the phone, take your time, keep ringing them and pushing them to be equal and inclusive. 564 people upvoted this post. If everyone rings them and talks for 10 minutes to them about their bigotry, that is 94 hours of their time, or two full time employees defending their segregationi…
/r/MensRights24/01/13 12:11 PM
1

[I think that pic on their site just about sums it up:] (http://www.xyonline.net/sites/default/files/images/Eat%20your%20vegetables%20respect%20women.jpg) Also looks like financed astroturf Gentlemen, it's time to get your best white knight drag out, look and sound convincing and apply for the grants and put them to proper use once you liberated them.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 11:51 AM
1

We have a new pig wrestinling champion ;)
/r/MensRights23/01/13 01:49 PM
1

I whistle or sing if I am walking faster and am about to overtake someone (of any gender) over when it's dark. Men get scared too, it's a totally natural reaction.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 03:15 PM
3

Because feminists and other haters think they can bamboozle the sheeple into not thinking for themselves. It's a general IQ test, and well, it's wise to accept the results...
/r/MensRights17/01/13 10:58 AM
1

I think even if marriage was sensible, (which it isn't), there is no way that I'd marry that mother, her son, or the girl she is addressing(all of course subject to local marriage laws...). They all sound grim, bitter and stupid, yuck.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 05:51 PM
3

The real problem is that feminist are unpleasant people and being a feminist is a symptom of that problem, but not the cause. They'd be just as mean and annoying as believers of any other philosophy or religion. Leave well alone, make friends with normal women instead, build a visible community that other normal women can find easily and join, and make sure to keep the feminists out. Make your space and prove your vision with a good example.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 06:11 PM
2

Misandry and misogyny are just convenient excuses for assholes to do what they do. If you removed feminism/chauvinism from the equation, you'd not end up with a nice person cured of bigotry, but with the same old nasty person who now just uses another excuse to be evil. Ideas don't make people do stupid things, in the same way that guns, kitchen knives and fists are not dangerous until misused. Feminism is a symptom, not a cause.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 12:18 AM
3

Just move the ballet studio onto the football field, money saved, problem solved, it's green and equal, plus the girls get some much needed fresh air :P
/r/MensRights10/01/13 01:48 AM
1

Distinct? it's just bog-standard prostitution(of the gross kind). If people are stupid enough to buy, then why prevent their self-inflicted punishment? Some people cannot be helped, they are not happy unless they suffer...
/r/MensRights10/01/13 01:42 AM
0

Nothing to do with feminism, dangerous and helpless people of all genders are cut lose in the UK to harm themselves and others, it's called 'care in the community'. There are plenty of male patients who repeatedly assault (and kill) random people.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 06:10 PM
2

Yeah, but who would pay for the administrations staff and other perks then? Remember the new rules: today's students are tomorrow's +10% taxpayers and lifelong debt slaves. I guess it's all easier to bear if you don't have the math to work out just how badly you were taken to the cleaners...
/r/MensRights04/01/13 02:51 PM
2

I think you're reading too much into the rabbit problem, this one (unlike everything else) is very unlikely to be her fault. I never heard of a rabbit freezing to death -- they wear furcoats and most people keep them outdoors all year long, even in very cold regions. If anything, heat is the enemy that actually kills them, not the cold. They are prone to die suddenly for all sorts of reasons, from uterine cancer to GI stasis, enteritis and so on.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 12:59 PM
1

Veterans -- well, when are men going to figure it out that most men in the army and the police force simply are viewed as cannonfodder? Has there ever been correct payment of what was promised after the war? Of course, not. Not in the old Rome and not in modern times. CAVEAT EMPTOR. Look at free contraception this way: The govt, knows what most of the current crop of potential mothers will end up as lone parents and so, Uncle Sam is trying whatever it can to neuter those people, to prevent a del…
/r/MensRights02/01/13 01:47 PM
2

It's when no-one is checking you out anymore that you need to start worrying :P
/r/MensRights02/01/13 01:32 PM
3

If she has kids, she walks with a slap on the wrists. If she is child-free, they'll throw the book at her, so that letting mothers escape jail in order to save money doesn't look as bad as it actually is, in the statistics.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 12:55 PM
1

So, behaving towards peope with consideration is 'subservience'? I don't see any manners in the Bad Wife Guide that I would want to extend to anyone, let alone a spouse.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 12:40 AM
1

What actually is wrong about the 'Good Wife's Guide'? Nothing at all! It's great advice for anyone! The Good Wife does nothing that anyone of any gender would not do for their partner -- and people act as if that is something embarressing to be a well-mannered, considerate person who does not make their partner's life a misery.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 10:32 PM
1

The Bad Wife's Guide Have no dinner ready. Don't plan ahead, even the moment before, and be sure to never ever have a meal, let alone an edible one ready on time for his return. This is a way of letting him know that you have not been thinking about him and are not concerned about his needs. Most men are hungry when they get home and the prospect of a good meal is part of the warm welcome needed, and something he'll not even dare dreaming of. Prepare yourself. Take 15 minutes to rest so you'll b…
/r/MensRights31/12/12 06:49 PM
1

Looks like the entry has been deleted...
/r/MensRights29/12/12 05:34 PM
2

Nothing stops you from making your very own charity for 'men who code', and, lots of them probably could do with some help. People keep griping about what they don't have, instead of building their own stuff, defining their own world and making a space they can be happy with.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 05:07 PM
2

Lots of people (of either gender) are simply imcompetent and have been brought up learning that 'skiving' is acceptable and nowadays. Those are the people who end up with dirty homes and serial arguments over trivial stuff like bins and ketchup stains. Whilst there are some genderspecific ways of arguing this is incidental -- their real problem is that they are uncultured idiots. So no, it's not men's rights at all, normal people don't have those kind of problems -- they keep a clean house and h…
/r/MensRights24/12/12 09:51 PM
1

Note that child-free women usually get treated in the same ways as men do, the leniency for mothers is not favoritism, but simply a least amount of damage hack around the general brokeness of the system. Mothers get a free pass, because it's not only incredibly expensive to look after the children in care and the public purse is empty, but also, for a kid, entering the British care system means their own life is guaranteed to be fubared. One solution to this would be normal sentences for non-dan…
/r/MensRights11/12/12 12:30 PM
3

Yeah. The moment the DM reports anything it always 'unhappens'. Move along now, nothing to see here...
/r/MensRights10/12/12 10:46 AM
-3

Gays already have a strong political movement with a very successful lobby and many of them are causing straight men (and women) a lot of problems with their political agenda and the special rights and privileges they have gained in the work place and other public spaces as a protected class. Gays and heterosexuals are not equals nowadays and given the gay's movements abysmal record of treating Christians and straight people they regard as 'enemies', a lot of folks no longer support gays and fee…
/r/MensRights10/12/12 09:27 AM
1

Actually, I don't think that there is a difference in hatred for the ugly in any gender, just the criteria differ, but not the percentage of assholes who use them as weapons against others.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 09:09 AM
13

"I hope you don't really think all women who identify as feminists believe men want to rape women all day long. I certainly don't think so and I am an editor/writer of a feminist blog." Well, by now feminism is as discredited as nazism. It's not that all nazis were bad people, but nazis as a group enabled some extreme elements to implement nazism in it's pure form, with terrible results. Without those nice and well-meaning but naive sympathisers, Nazism would never have gotten beyond the pub tab…
/r/MensRights06/12/12 09:41 AM
1

But, it's not 'cheaper' a lot of the time! If you compare the prices per kg you'll find that often fresh vegetables are a lot more expensive than pork, chicken or dairy and eggs.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 09:02 AM
1

MR is mainly a straight group for the reasons that the vast majority of problems discussed are parental/marital rights issues and the various difficulties of heterosexual interaction in general. So there is not a lot here for gay men to take part in, in the same way that straight MR do not find all that much to discuss on gay forums. Also, whilst gay people experience discrimination for being gay, it's a very different experience than being straight and discriminated because of one's straightnes…
/r/MensRights03/12/12 11:22 AM
1

Whilst we're at it, can we ban all hideous dolls at the same time? So many ugly people are negatively inspired by them and copy their bad example, getting a totally wrong idea about what a proper lifestyle is -- there's ugly people in ugly clothes everywhere you look nowadays, gah!
/r/MensRights03/12/12 09:51 AM
3

Lots of women don't want kids for the same reason that men don't want them: too expensive and too much effort and worry. All those single people will get taxed more to pay for parents, but so is everyone else -- why do you think there is such a big drive to get mothers out into the workplace and feminism is held up as the great liberation? Not for their salvation or because nurseries are so good for 3 month old babes, but to raise the tax base, and politicians of all nations openly are saying so…
/r/MensRights02/12/12 11:04 AM
5

Feminists do not want equality but inversion, otherwise they'd call themselves 'Egalitarians' instead.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 02:34 PM
4

"Now there is no such similar organization for boys- feminist groups sue whenever somebody tries on grounds of sexism, despite the fact that - 12-17 year old boys are significantly more at risk in poor neighbors to become victims of crime, gangs, drugsm etc" PACE started a charity for girls and it's no different to a charity that (say) cares about hedgehogs and does not take kittens in. I don't think that anyone has any business to tell people what to be charitable about! Rather than gripe about…
/r/MensRights23/11/12 04:26 PM
8

Just claim you are gay and this will solve the immediate discriminate problem you have in the UK in an efficient way. This works for both genders, the UK is full of 'rice-bowl gays' by now. No-one is going to check that it's true, and if all fails, you can just say you're bi, case closed.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 03:09 PM
1

A college should just stick to education and leave any sport or hobby to private organizations. That way, politics are kept to a minimum, and people can spend their money on things they actually want, and their hobby won't get hijacked by bureaucrats who want to 'change society'.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 09:00 AM
3

Polygamy is not male-friendly at all, nor is it a good 'breeding' program from a technical POV, since it quickly limits the male genetic lines. Polygamy useful if you want to quickly produce a large amount of soldiers and motivate men to get rich or die trying.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 07:05 PM
3

Of course not.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 06:12 PM
2

Rather that faff around with artificial wombs, why not re-engineer homo sapiens to remove the annoying sexual dimorphism -- or, even simpler yet -- just replace everyone with robots... instant world peace!
/r/MensRights16/11/12 10:00 AM
0

Why can't the girls/women wear a fake mustache then? Or draw a thin one on the upper lip with eyeliner? It would show they are comfortable and in touch with their inner male and liberate them from those stifling feminine gender stereotypes at the same time.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 01:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter