TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Twebified Archive

View 0 posts and 70 comments by Twebified on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Which countries would you recommend the most?
/r/MensRights30/07/24 01:15 PM
6

Women were only ever "oppressed" by men the same way that children are "oppressed" by their parents.
/r/MensRights18/11/23 11:04 PM
-5

No because we have to tolerate westernized women.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/23 10:52 PM
4

I disagree, I think the only way men can cope with knowing the vast majority of them are undesirable to women is sheer gaslighting and denial.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/23 01:48 PM

Except.... 30-49 age bracket men are still significantly more single than women... the only age that this reverts is 65+ which I imagine is because there are so many fewer men at that age.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/23 01:34 PM

This, along with those STD studies that show female STD rates are sky-rocketing, but not male rates, prove that notion.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/23 01:03 PM
1

What "elite service" is this? Asking for a friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 02:44 PM
5

The "Appeal to nature" fallacy is a slippery slope considering how common rape is in nearly every species, including our own.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/21 06:24 PM
6

Finding out the man you're with used to be filthy rich but blew it all on other women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/21 12:59 AM
0

Actually kids are largely not benefiting society as it stands, considering hundreds of millions of them are going hungry and thirsty because there's, at least in some ways, too many of them. Frankly you're incentivizing women who can't support themselves, or who chose poor mates, to reproduce, which is largely detrimental to society in the long-term. An argument could also be made that financially independent women don't rely on their husbands, which motivates them, and allows them to raise chil…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/21 12:33 AM
1

Men do qualify and yet they don't raise kids - it's almost as if women are biologically programmed to want to raise children more than men. Hence why the 'goodies' disproportionately benefit you. Also, if men were the ones birthing children, women would get to experience being unwanted, lonely, and exploited in every other way but sexually.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/21 12:18 AM
1

That's the point, men don't have to give birth nor raise children, hence why us giving you money is a BENEFIT to you. And you might argue that you don't have to raise children either, but then fine, don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/21 11:53 PM
24

In regards to 'men don't have to worry as much about ageing,' in another comment of yours you point out how any guy over 25 is 'bald or balding' and therefore ugly to you/low quality. Is that not contradictory?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/21 11:39 PM
13

Sorry but if the men on dating apps 'aren't good enough to find a partner irl', hence their low quality, then... wouldn't the same be true for the women?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/21 11:37 PM
1

Where can I best read about each one of these points/concepts? Thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/21 01:43 PM
2

This entire interaction is the mother of all blackpills.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/21 02:46 PM
3

This comment needs to be stickied forever.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/21 02:42 PM
28

Can you imagine if the average woman had as little attention as the average man? Literally no matches on tinder; no attention IRL; constantly getting rejected when being forced to make the first moves. They'd SCREAM for help.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 04:08 PM
0

Women evolved to exploit men not to empathize with them. Once you come to terms with this fact, everything in the world makes sense.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/03/21 04:42 AM
9

Or in the very least they'd match with a variety of guys and not ONLY the most objectively good looking.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/21 04:30 AM
83

This past summer I was arguing with a woman about how men actually have it quite bad in society, and how you can see that manifest in male suicide rates. She quickly interrupted me to inform me that this was simply because of "toxic masculinity" and proceeded to talk about how she's afraid to walk alone at night. The irony of her apathetic dismissal was lost on her. Not to mention she certainly wasn't romantically interested in me anymore after I opened up about my concern for men's state in soc…
/r/MensRights03/01/21 08:49 PM
7

It's funny how women scream about not owing incels sex, but if chads stopped getting laid they'd start raping women en masse. Not to mention what women would do if they couldn't get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/21 04:40 PM
1

Is there a source on this?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/20 05:21 AM
1

If all of your male ancestors didn't have ludicrous amounts of casual sex, you wouldn't be here. They would've been out-reproduced by other, sluttier men, and your DNA would be non-existent.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 07:45 PM
1

Maybe children need/want fathers? IDK, just a hunch.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 07:39 PM
2

Ad hominem.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 07:34 PM
10

That is red pill actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 06:09 PM
6

How exactly can more than 20% of men be in the top 20% of men lol.
/r/TheRedPill21/04/20 02:10 AM
13

Agree. Good looking guys don't have to be assholes to get laid, but average and ugly guys do.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/20 01:51 AM
1

That is literally the only definition of value. It doesn't matter what women today think is "high value". It only matters what DNA still exists in millions of years. And that DNA has been and will be from men who are promiscuous.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 08:19 PM
1

So your refutation is that.... a guy who has 9 kids was deemed low value by women? Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 07:58 PM
1

I understand why it sounds confusing at first glance. However, high-value in evolutionary terms literally means how many offspring you have that will survive, and how high value those offspring will be. Therefore, Ghenghis Khan, who has 200 million direct descendants, was one of the highest value men of all fucking time. A guy who can inseminate a lot of females is incredibly sought after, because his DNA will help the woman's spread, aka the sexy son hypothesis. It's also why women PREFER men t…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 07:52 PM
1

Jesus christ this is so accurate it's sad that I've never realized it before.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 07:43 PM
1

Dear mother of God I hope not.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 07:42 PM
2

Love the fact that the first thing women will attack a man over is his ability to get laid, and then wonder why we don't like to commit to sluts. Might be a correlation there. It's almost like vagina is a commodity that men have to covet and compete for.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 07:34 PM
1

The proper analogy is if I were a man who could have lots of attractive sexual partners but only sleep with one ugly woman, or if I had the ability to possess tons of money but was somehow poor.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 07:30 PM
1

I'm talking about women not men lol. It's the complete opposite for men actually, I guess you can thank your fellow women for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 07:26 PM
3

Not to women that's for sure, some of them actually want me to tell them about all the women I've fucked, WHILST I'm fucking them. It's a fucking turn-on for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 07:25 PM
5

Not lately no.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 07:15 PM
1

Research shows the more attractive a woman the lower her N count, generally. There are many reasons for this, primarily the fact attractive women obtain commitment from HVM and thus don't need to use easy sex as a lure. Therefore if an attractive woman is a slut, it makes you question her mental state and overall value as a mate even more than an average looking slut.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 07:15 PM
1

A dog fed twice a day is happier than a dog fed once a day. That doesn't mean a dog fed three times a day isn't even happier.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 07:12 PM
2

You're wrong. Most guys would care. It's incredibly important, regardless of looks, and it might even be more disconcerting because attractive women don't need to be slutty.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 07:09 PM
3

No guy "respects" a guy who gets laid. The only emotions we feel in regard to that are jealousy and competitiveness. Also, it's almost like women pay to watch movies too... weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 07:07 PM
3

She literally refuses to understand a perfect analogy because it completely dismantles her argument lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 07:04 PM
4

If women were capable of what you're implying they're capable of then you wouldn't be in the dilemma you're in right now. If anything, you're selecting for the opposite of what you claim to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 06:58 PM
1

No, no, no! It must be that no decent men exist, and if they do they must be undesirable or defective in some other way! It can't be that I have awful taste in men and deserve to sleep in the shitty bed I've made!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 06:42 PM
2

Not to mention research shows that the better looking you are the more modest you are and the uglier you are the better looking you think you are relative to the truth. Turns out Brad Pitt doesn't have to be a narcissistic asshole to get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 06:38 PM
2

This comment is so incredibly accurate - and in my experience, lots of great looking guys are naturally agreeable, because they don't have to be assertive bad boys; whereas less-desirable guys do.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 06:32 PM
6

I know right, can you imagine a gender wanting sympathy for their struggles and shaming the opposite gender for not complying? Crazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 06:22 PM
1

Tell that to Ghengis Khan’s 20 million direct descendants. Seems him and his kin did alright for themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/20 02:50 AM
1

I love the argument "BUT IT'S A CRIME SO IT'S WRONG", as if law doesn't change like the weather from eon to eon and place to place.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/20 07:56 PM
3

Western women don't want their pussy-monopoly broken up.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 03:37 PM
1

This makes perfect sense evolutionarily and this is almost entirely why leaders/kings don't mind sending young men off to war to die. It's not them and it's not their sons, and after these other men have died they're free to reap the sexual rewards. Furthermore, some men might dominate society, but women always dominate them. No man is immune to the power of pussy.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 05:39 PM
3

It was sarcasm lol.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 09:58 PM
5

In some countries they have to pay sales tax on tampons!!!...
/r/MensRights22/04/19 09:48 PM
60

If this is what society looks like when "men are the oppressors" and "women are the oppressed", then I'd hate to see the opposite....
/r/MensRights22/04/19 09:43 PM
93

"It is a word that's used". Yeah, so is the word cunt, but no one's going to call you that in a committee hearing.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 03:12 AM
17

The shooter may have been a man but so was the only person who tried to stop him. I don't recall hearing of any women trying to wrestle him to the ground.
/r/MensRights16/03/19 03:06 PM
106

Jesus fucking christ. Imagine if there was an ad like this targeting women, the fucking outrage would be immeasurable. Anyone who says we live in a man's world should watch this ad and point me to the feminine-demonizing version. Glad I stopped using their overpriced crap a long time ago. Do yourself a favour, switch to a safety razer for a better and cheaper shave.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 03:25 AM
16

I think it tells you all you need to know about gender equality in today's society. There's literally a default sub on the biggest site of the internet, where all women do is bitch about the most inane shit possible, like "someone just assumed my favourite colour was pink" and "I'm the only female mechanic in my class" and "a guy tried to flirt with me while I was in the grocery store!" Meanwhile, r/Mensrights is trying to figure out how to stop men from killing themselves at 5x the rate of wome…
/r/MensRights06/11/18 03:10 PM
8

I don't know if I agree with this. If you have a post history in r/mensrights, or it's being discussed and you try and defend it, you get downvoted into oblivion. They literally compare it to r/incels.
/r/MensRights06/11/18 03:00 PM
98

Holy shit I just realized I'm subbed to it automatically. What am I doing with my life?
/r/MensRights06/11/18 02:58 AM
1

It depends what your definition of "success" is, and what kind of population you're talking about. The discussion at hand is about the "glass ceiling", which has to do with men attaining higher-paying occupations as compared to women, which is irrefutably due to personality differences and IQ differences. If inheritance were more of an influencer than IQ, like you say, then why would men seem to benefit so disproportionately from it?
/r/MensRights19/08/18 08:02 PM
3

If intelligence is strongly correlated to wealth, and both intelligence and wealth are highly heritable, then all you're saying is that those that inherit are likely to be intelligent. Also, high IQ people can both be more successful and mentally ill than average IQ people, while still being more successful on average, it just depends on the distribution and the exact correlation between mental illness and success - as they aren't mutually exclusive.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 07:07 PM
6

Except your point is invalid because IQ is an incredibly predictive and accurate measure of general intelligence. And no, a toddler doesn't have the same IQ as an adult... that's not how that works, upscaling children's IQs is only used to easily compare to other children.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 06:53 PM
19

You're right, intelligence has literally no influence on occupational attainment. Which is why children and animals are just as qualified to do any job an adult human can do. Bring on the toddler nurses and the feline architects please -and don't forget about down-syndrome astronauts!
/r/MensRights19/08/18 04:29 PM
2

IQ influences culture far more than the other way around. It's not a coincidence that ethnic Jews have the highest IQs of any population ever tested, nor is it a coincidence that nearly all extremely high IQ people are male.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 09:55 PM
1

Except that twin adoption studies show that IQ is largely genetic, culture might have a very small influence but isn't it more likely a high IQ group of people will prioritize education and other intellectual pursuits?
/r/MensRights27/07/18 07:03 PM
6

This is correct. Men are a higher-risk, higher-reward gender as compared to women. You're far less likely to reproduce, but when you do you're likely to reproduce more, and with virtually no limit to your potential - see Ghengis Khan. This variability isn't restricted to intelligence, it exists on nearly every measurable trait; take height for example, women aggregate far closer to their average than men do. This essentially allows sex-specific traits to spread far quicker in men than in women. …
/r/MensRights27/07/18 06:25 PM
11

It turns out people are inherently selfish regardless of gender, who knew?
/r/MensRights17/03/18 05:37 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter