TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Twisting_Storm Archive

View 0 posts and 106 comments by Twisting_Storm on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-13

Well circumcision is a good thing
/r/MensRights17/08/24 10:43 PM
-3

The foreskin is relatively useless, just like wisdom teeth. The benefits of removing them outweigh the drawbacks.
/r/MensRights14/08/24 02:28 AM
-13

Exactly. Other than point number 5 (since circumcision is a good thing), I agree with this list. People don’t talk about how men have disadvantages too.
/r/MensRights13/08/24 02:53 PM
-3

That’s not true at all. Wisdom teeth are usually removed even if they aren’t currently posing any health problems, as they often cause problems down the road.
/r/MensRights13/08/24 02:44 PM
-1

Sounds like projection.
/r/MensRights13/08/24 02:33 PM
-4

Stop lying. UTI risk has been proven to be lower for circumcised males.
/r/MensRights13/08/24 02:33 PM
-49

That is not mutilation. It’s like wisdom teeth removal (unless you consider that mutilation too). UTIs can be deadly. The benefits of circumcision outweigh the drawbacks.
/r/MensRights13/08/24 12:09 AM
-68

Even with that, the risk is still greater.
/r/MensRights13/08/24 12:01 AM
-24

Circumcision is safer in the long run than not being circumcised.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 10:31 PM
-111

It’s not wrong. Circumcision reduces risk of UTIs.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 10:23 PM
-26

Circumcision of newborns is a good thing. It’s safer then and reduces risk of UTIs.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 10:23 PM
50

Dude, first rule of law: you don’t talk to the police before talking to a lawyer. Seriously. Many innocent people have been convicted because they thought they could talk their way out of things. The lawyer knows a lot more than you do.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 05:49 PM
39

Still, talk to a lawyer. Please.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 05:37 PM
50

Talk to a lawyer. That’s your first step. Don’t do anything else until you’ve spoken with a lawyer. You don’t want to accidentally hurt your case, assuming what you said is true.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 05:24 PM
0

Your eyes serve a very important function unlike the foreskin.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 05:40 AM
3

How are bacteria alive but not the unborn, who are much more complex than a bacteria?
/r/MensRights28/07/24 11:54 PM
8

Pro life. It’s not okay for mothers to kill their own children. It’s as simple as that.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 11:47 PM
3

Killing is not the solution to that.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 11:46 PM
-1

Well actually, wisdom teeth are often removed before they become a problem. In the case of the foreskin, it is a relatively useless piece of tissue, so it does not do much harm to get it removed, and the procedure has a low chance of complications.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 09:09 PM
-2

Hygiene doesn’t prevent all UTIs. The risk of a UTI drops significantly when circumcised.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 05:58 PM
-19

Maybe the nurses criticize those who don’t circumcise because they realize circumcision is beneficial.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 05:31 PM
-4

Circumcision does help prevent UTIs. It’s a good thing. The loss of sensation claim is debatable as well.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 05:29 PM
2

I hope you’re joking. I hate to use the term misogynist lightly, but you sound like a severe misogynist.
/r/MensRights13/07/24 06:22 PM
0

Don’t replace one evil with another evil.
/r/MensRights13/07/24 04:12 PM
3

Uh what? We don’t want either patriarchy or matriarchy.
/r/MensRights13/07/24 02:10 PM
0

I had my wisdom teeth removed when I was a teenager even though I didn’t want them removed at the time. Looking back, I’m glad my parents did that. Should they have not been allowed to do so?
/r/MensRights05/07/24 10:18 PM
-3

It’s beneficial in the long run.
/r/MensRights04/07/24 01:12 AM
-1

It’s not mutilation. Do you consider wisdom teeth removal to be mutilation?
/r/MensRights04/07/24 12:46 AM
-1

You mention “bad studies” yet list multiple bad studies. Classic cherry picking.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 10:38 PM
1

Nice job spreading pseudoscience.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 10:38 PM
-8

Circumcision is a good thing. I’m not the one lying here.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 08:35 PM
-8

Can’t cope if I’m happy with being circumcised.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 08:34 PM
-24

No, circumcision is a good thing. The foreskin is relatively useless and does more harm than good. It increases the risk of UTIs and makes hygiene a lot more difficult. I’m glad I was circumcised.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 06:50 PM
3

No way. Feminism is usually synonymous with support for killing unborn babies, not to mention the misandry that often comes with third wave feminism.
/r/MensRights21/05/24 10:47 PM
0

How though?
/r/MensRights16/02/24 04:25 AM
-1

Circumcision is not sexualizing children.
/r/MensRights16/02/24 02:43 AM
-5

I mean, he did have sex. Pregnancy is always a possibility unless one of the parties involved is sterile. Ultimately, I think he should take responsibility too, even though the woman is clearly in the wrong for lying to him. I’m against abortion for a similar reason; it’s not the kid’s fault.
/r/MensRights05/02/24 09:14 PM
0

Well, you have a kid now. You can choose whether or not you want to parent them, but at the very least, don’t resent the kid. After all, they’re still your child. If you don’t want to have another child, maybe it’s best to get a vasectomy. I know this is tough, but it won’t be the end of the world. Maybe it will be something special in the end.
/r/MensRights05/02/24 09:11 PM
-3

I think it would be more trouble to flee than to pay child support.
/r/MensRights05/02/24 09:09 PM
0

Real original comeback.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 03:35 AM
1

It’s not mutilation, unless you consider something like wisdom teeth removal to be mutilation.
/r/MensRights02/02/24 03:15 AM
1

Actually, that’s what you’re doing.
/r/MensRights02/02/24 01:19 AM
1

Sorry that you won’t listen to science.
/r/MensRights02/02/24 12:49 AM
-2

Brushing off antibiotic resistance like it’s a joke is pathetic. Attitudes like that are part of the reason this is becoming a problem.
/r/MensRights01/02/24 03:10 AM
1

Still using ad hominem attacks.
/r/MensRights01/02/24 12:54 AM
0

Men can’t wash their parts 24/7. There’s always the opportunity for bacteria to become trapped in there. Antibiotic resistance is becoming a crisis, and avoiding bacterial infections should be a priority.
/r/MensRights01/02/24 12:29 AM
0

More ad hominem attacks.
/r/MensRights01/02/24 12:28 AM
-2

Okay, you are definitely a bit unhinged. Trying to gaslight me into thinking there’s something wrong with me for supporting circumcision. Either you’re a troll or you have a serious problem. Meanwhile you’re attacking the author of the study based on his character and not the merits of the article.
/r/MensRights01/02/24 12:27 AM
0

Circumcision fetishist Straw man and ad hominem attack. Now I see you’re also making an ad hominem attack on the author and not addressing the merits of the study. I see you casually mention antibiotics while ignoring the antibiotic resistance crisis. You sound a bit unhinged. Almost like you’re obsessed with being anti-circumcision.
/r/MensRights31/01/24 11:57 PM
-11

That stat is false. It doesn’t account for the lifetime risk of UTI’s. This study shows that approximately 32% of uncircumcised men experience a UTI in their lifetime compared with only 9% of uncircumcised men. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23201382/ And guess what? Antibiotic resistance is becoming a crisis. No need to make yourself more at risk for infections that require antibiotics. Exposing the urethra to contaminants Our urethra is longer than women’s. In fact, having contaminants trappe…
/r/MensRights31/01/24 11:55 PM
1

Practically zero? Well, that’s not true. According to this study, there’s almost a fourfold increase in UTI risk over one’s lifetime in uncircumcised men. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23201382/ And yes, I do think a reduced risk in UTIs is worth it. We are having an antibiotic resistance crisis, so limiting the number of times you’ll need antibiotics is very helpful.
/r/MensRights31/01/24 11:36 PM
-13

Actually, there are benefits to circumcision. Namely reduced risk of infections and UTIs. Stop being dramatic and calling it “object rape”.
/r/MensRights31/01/24 11:28 PM
-2

Circumcision is good for hygiene and for reducing the risk of UTIs. It’s very worth it. I’m glad I was circumcised as a newborn.
/r/MensRights31/01/24 11:27 PM
-42

Circumcision is not genital mutilation. The benefits outweigh the risks.
/r/MensRights31/01/24 07:23 PM
5

Because some of them don’t understand that killing babies is wrong (as do some men)
/r/MensRights15/12/23 03:41 AM
-1

The irony of all this is you seem to claim information is biased when it’s pro circumcision yet give a clearly biased link for an anti circumcision post. No, circumcision is not pure evil.
/r/MensRights02/10/23 03:17 AM
1

No, you’re the one making up the idea that UTIs aren’t reduced by circumcision. That’s not a debatable fact at all.
/r/MensRights02/10/23 02:37 AM
0

Wrong. UTI chances are reduced significantly when circumcision is done. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23201382/ It’s self explanatory how it makes hygiene easier. It’s much easier to clean down there when you’re circumcised versus uncircumcised.
/r/MensRights02/10/23 01:08 AM
0

Statements like that show how clueless you are and how immature you’re acting.
/r/MensRights02/10/23 01:03 AM
1

It is true, especially the UTI part. Stats show there’s a large reduction of UTI chances over a lifetime if you’re circumcised versus not circumcised.
/r/MensRights02/10/23 12:09 AM
0

Learn to discuss things civilly on here. And while you’re at it, stop being dramatic.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 09:42 PM
-5

That’s not mutilation. Quit being a drama king (or queen).
/r/MensRights01/10/23 09:24 PM
-11

Any risk is too much The risks of not getting circumcised are higher than the risks associated with circumcision No, the vast majority of pleasure is not in the foreskin. Circumcised men experience pleasure just fine Also, yes, wisdom teeth are sometimes removed even if they aren’t causing current problems, as the potential for future problems is reason to get them removed.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 09:21 PM
0

None exist for circumcision I guess you forgot that circumcision reduces UTIs and STD risk and makes hygiene easier. Also, no, the foreskin is not needed for pleasure. Men experience pleasure just fine without it, and you also leave out that things may be different depending on whether you’re circumcised as an adult or as an infant. Infant circumcision is less risky and more beneficial than adult circumcision anyway.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 09:19 PM
-4

Well that’s a dramatic and immature response.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 09:12 PM
0

Not a tu quoque. And I was responding to the other person’s claim that circumcision is so unique among other procedures when it’s really not. Now as for anesthesia, there should definitely be anesthesia for circumcision. I thought they used that now.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 09:12 PM
-9

Except this surgery is very low risk and does not affect a significant body part. I mean, parents make their teenagers get their wisdom teeth removed a lot even if they aren’t causing problems, so it’s not like circumcision is the only surgery that people can be required to get before they’re an adult.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 08:50 PM
-22

I’m glad I was circumcised. If I have kids who are boys, I plan to have them circumcised. Y’all are making mountains out of molehills with this circumcision hysteria. I agree with much of the points made on this sub but I can’t get behind this anti circumcision rhetoric.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 08:06 PM
-14

That’s not true at all.
/r/MensRights22/09/23 12:09 AM
-3

You don’t know they would have ignored you. It’s better to at least try and get justice out of this.
/r/MensRights21/09/23 08:29 PM
-38

That’s not pseudoscience. You’re less likely to get STDs if you’re circumcised, and the same thing goes for UTIs.
/r/MensRights21/09/23 08:10 PM
-19

Circumcision is a good thing. That part you’re wrong about. However, what concerns me in your post is that you said she raped you. Did you report her to the police? That’s very serious.
/r/MensRights21/09/23 08:10 PM
9

They’re still women biologically.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 12:37 PM
-41

No, you are part of the problem. Relationships are meant to lead to marriage.
/r/MensRights30/07/23 03:13 AM
-43

7 years is too long to wait until you’re married. If you’re scared to marry her then why are you with her?
/r/MensRights30/07/23 02:49 AM
-49

Honestly dude, you shouldn’t be in a 7 year relationship and not be married. Either you’re meant for each other or you shouldn’t be in the relationship
/r/MensRights30/07/23 02:20 AM
4

Well age of consent is 16 in a lot of places. Not saying it’s okay, but it might be a stretch to call it rape at this point without knowing the details.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 09:18 PM
-9

How many posts about circumcision on here?? Circumcision is a good thing.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 10:15 PM
12

You can enjoy sex just fine while being circumcised.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 09:56 PM
2

But they still have them removed when they’re a teenager, often because their parents made that decision for them. Moving the goalposts I see.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 09:11 PM
0

No they have not.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 06:59 PM
-2

Circumcision doesn’t just help against cancer. It reduces STDs and UTIs, and it also makes hygiene much easier. I didn’t say it prevents those things, but it reduces them.,
/r/MensRights20/07/23 04:47 PM
-5

I don’t even believe in it for religious reasons, however doing it for religious reasons is allowed under freedom of religion, as circumcision does more good than harm. Circumcision is a good thing.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 04:20 PM
-4

Depends on if there is a valid medical reason for it.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 03:38 PM
-10

No it’s not. Is removing wisdom teeth barbaric?
/r/MensRights20/07/23 03:28 PM
-3

No it is not. Circumcision is a good thing. It’s done for a similar reason to why parents get their teenagers’ wisdom teeth removed. It’s beneficial in the long run.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 03:27 PM
8

Not sure why you’re getting downvoted. Innocent until proven guilty is important. That said, from the evidence I’ve seen, I don’t see how she would be found not guilty. Seems very clear she did it.
/r/MensRights23/06/23 02:01 PM
1

While I get that the issue of the Boy Scouts is a real problem, this post has way too much sexism. Stereotyping women the way you did and saying they don’t belong in the military is sexist.
/r/MensRights06/06/23 03:21 PM
-1

The benefits are not exaggerated. They are supported by decades of evidence.
/r/MensRights06/06/23 02:56 PM
0

You brush off the antibiotics/alternative treatments issue as if it’s no big deal, when it can actually be a very big deal. “You already have to circumcise 118 boys to prevent a single UTI.” That sounds false. I’m curious as to the methodology of that study. “Medical necessity” is not the bar I have to prove. You’re using a begging the question fallacy here by stating that something has to be medically necessary in order to perform a medical procedure. You’re presupposing the truth of your concl…
/r/MensRights06/06/23 02:50 PM
-5

“UTIs can easily be treated with antibiotics.” That’s not always true. It is most of the time, but not always. Are you also against wisdom teeth removal?
/r/MensRights06/06/23 02:17 AM
-20

So are you against wisdom teeth removal too?
/r/MensRights06/06/23 01:44 AM
-20

Better hygiene and reduced STD and UTI risk.
/r/MensRights06/06/23 01:44 AM
-38

I agree with a lot of things on this sub, but this is not one of them. Circumcision is beneficial. I am glad I was circumcised.
/r/MensRights06/06/23 12:52 AM
-4

Circumcision is beneficial. It’s like having wisdom teeth removed. Do you also consider that mutilation?
/r/MensRights25/05/23 03:21 AM
-21

Circumcision does not count as mutilation. Not sure what you mean about reproductive rights, abortion is murder. Otherwise I agree with you.
/r/MensRights24/05/23 07:24 PM
1

They probably used that term because in many states the age of consent is 16, California is an exception. Still, it’s messed up for a teacher to do that even in states where it’s legal. Teachers could easily do that to assert power over students
/r/MensRights20/05/23 01:52 PM
1

Claiming circumcision is rape is an insult to actual rape victims.
/r/MensRights19/05/23 05:17 PM
0

Oh cut it out with the drama. Circumcision is not rape. I was not raped by being circumcised. Don’t act like the feminists who cry rape to everything.
/r/MensRights19/05/23 03:29 AM
-7

Clearly not just the foreskin. I’m circumcised and I experience pleasure.
/r/MensRights18/05/23 01:07 AM
-12

Circumcision is a good thing. I’m glad I got circumcised as an infant. I don’t know where you’re getting this 80% from, but it is definitely false that 80% of sexual pleasure comes from the foreskin.
/r/MensRights17/05/23 09:45 PM
-11

Circumcision is not mutilation. It has health benefits and makes hygiene easier. Are you also against wisdom teeth removal?
/r/MensRights16/05/23 05:36 PM
2

People on dialysis or on pacemakers can’t sustain their own lives without a machine. Are they not human in your eyes? It’s ableist to say that someone’s inability to survive on their own means they’re less worthy of life.
/r/MensRights15/05/23 02:38 PM
5

Let’s see, every person is a lump of cells, and plenty of people can’t live on their own. Infants can’t live on their own, nor can disabled people. Are they less human in your eyes?
/r/MensRights14/05/23 08:54 PM
4

Many pro lifers actually do support aid for children and pregnant women, such as paid maternity leave.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 01:14 PM
9

Disagree. A child’s life shouldn’t be a choice. It’s not right to kill a child just because they’re unwanted. If you wouldn’t kill a born child for this reason, you shouldn’t kill an unborn child for this reason, either.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 01:13 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter