TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TwoFootTwo Archive

View 4 posts and 34 comments by TwoFootTwo on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

The feminised society is slowly reverting back into a puritanical ideocracy. Soon it will be rape to look at a woman ("male gaze"), and since it will be impossible to never look at a woman, they will have to cover their faces with scarves and try to remain indoors. /s
/r/MensRights01/07/15 02:57 AM
7

The Guardian would never compromise the honour of M'Lady by sending her to the depths of forsaken underground plumbery. The Guardian esteems M'Lady's virtuous spirit above all other Godly things, and vows to maintain it beyond the grime of creation's realm.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 02:46 AM
3

Really, that's the Guardian View? That Guardian was half the reason he got sacked.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 02:44 AM
3

I think there are white knights who would do that for m'lady.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 02:39 AM
2

I bet you fucking ooze empathy then This isn't an argument, it's an insult, and since you seem to be AMR associated, I say it's harassment. When I can argue with you on AMR without getting my comments deleted, we can talk. Bye
/r/MensRights01/07/15 01:53 AM
31

Fundamentally, from a broader perspective, what is happening in the feminised societies is that women are claiming total control of the reproductive process, all the way down to each action and thought that men contribute to that process. So it is no longer a question of just who decides whether the baby stays or goes, or who decides on birth control. All sexual encounters are to happen absolutely the way that women would prefer them to, and if this doesn't happen, she must have legal recourse a…
/r/MensRights01/07/15 01:50 AM
3

Looking through your comments you seem to be a Grade 2 Manginous Harasser. You've been reported for harassment. Please go back to the AMR bog-trolls. Thank you.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 01:37 AM
6

If women could get a control of the supply of pornography, they would be gaining some serious social power over men. Thankfully, it'll never happen. There will always be some country willing to sell pornography, and with today's technology, people will always be willing to make their own porn and sell it. We aren't about to revert to medieval attitudes to sex, no matter how much the neo-puritans would like that. But I really feel for those Swedish guys - I really don't know how they live in that…
/r/MensRights01/07/15 12:22 AM
2

This is why they are trying to ban Greek classics and Shakespeare from uni courses. They are ideologically similar to the Taliban. I'm actually starting to wonder if this is how the civilisational gender cycle works. Women go batshit crazy about being independent from men, and society obliges, giving women all the power. This stresses them out enormously, so they go bat-shit crazy again, becoming hysterically puritanical, and restricting sex practice and female freedoms to a degree that society …
/r/MensRights30/06/15 11:22 PM
6

The day someone like Jimmy Carter admits that men have human rights, will be the day the last war on earth has ended. Nobody with real political clout will accept that men have human rights until war no longer exists. It's impossible. Someone who all civilization agrees is fair game for getting blown and ripped to pieces (combatants) cannot have human rights. It's totally inconsistent.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 11:09 PM
7

The only prison rapes that matter are those that happen to women. Those are very important.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 10:24 PM
39

I really don't understand what world feminists live in. I mean, who is actually telling them how to dress and what to do? They are already free to dress and do whatever the fuck they please. Women running around with Mexican wrestling masks and their tits out in New York, and the press says it is awesome and they are being free women. Women attacking Angela Merkel with their tits out and the press says they're awesome and free. Who is actually stopping women from doing anything? I think I've sta…
/r/MensRights30/06/15 10:00 PM
4

I live in continuous wonder at why we have to even question this at all. We're supposed to be working towards egalitarian ideals, not Middle Age chivalrism. Aside from asking what the the trip is supposed to accomplish, you could embellish a little: "I mean, I'm aware that physics has way more guys than girls, but I asked the medical school, where women greatly outnumber men, if they organise trips for males only, and they laughed at me."
/r/MensRights30/06/15 09:45 PM
7

You people are a living manifestation of cultural schizophrenia. CAFE, a peaceable group of Canadian who do nothing except setting up male shelters and support charitable advocacy for men in trouble, is continually getting hounded out of lecture halls by maniacal feminist zealots. And the sub where you posted your argument about suicide recently organised a campaign to get them banned from joining a Pride event.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 09:15 PM
6

Do you really believe this person worked helping men with suicide? He's a fucking r/AMR redditor. By his own account he thinks men commit suicide because they're violent and selfish. I can imagine the hotline call: "oh really, you tried to hang yourself? Maybe you should consider being less violent, isn't that a little violent? Haven't you thought about your parents, your family? You're really being a bit selfish trying to hang yourself buddy."
/r/MensRights30/06/15 09:12 PM
4

I'm not upset - you're part of a hateful troll-sub that is committed to nothing except ridiculing issues like male suicide and men's health issues. Replies on AMR that offer even the slightest contrarian view, no matter how politely worded, are removed before anyone can even see them. I even tried to reply to your post over there before writing this OP, and they deleted it before it could even be read. So I don't know why you think you should get treated to a discussion over here. Think of it in…
/r/MensRights30/06/15 08:59 PM
8

Yes, that's why you are part of a sub whose whole purpose is to ridicule the concept of male advocacy. Go back to trolling at AMR and please get out of here.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 08:55 PM
9

We're discussing a social issue here, not organising a suicide support group. Your little troll-pals at AMR don't let us spam or even comment on their site so get the fuck out of here please.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 08:50 PM
5

Can one of the mods get this AMR clown out of here please?
/r/MensRights30/06/15 08:45 PM
1

Any news source that receives government/investor backing defaults to feminism today. There are two types: 100% feminist 50-99% feminist Vice, Guardian, The Atlantic, etc are type 1. The Telegraph, NYT, even Fox News, are type 2. Feminism is status quo. Radfems are the most radical zealots within the status quo. Feminism is not a fringe, radical or minority movement, it is the reigning doctrine of our civilization.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 04:05 PM
1

I often hear redditors expressing the same misconception about the UK You were seemingly equalising gun ownership in the UK and the US. UK gun ownership per capita is 6/100, in the US is 88/100. It is an often heard argument amongst American gun enthusiasts to tell other Americans that all over the world gun regulations aren't actually that strict, and that gun violence in the US has other sources (e.g. "not enough guns", "or, hem hem, some races just like shooting people, hem hem"). I admit wha…
/r/MensRights30/06/15 03:49 PM
4

He posted it on a sub called "against men's rights". It is a sub whose only purpose is to ridicule men's issues, and pour scorn and insults on men with problems. It is a small, very niche sub for feminist haters, manginas and trolls who write about things like why men with mental health issues are really just rape apologists. He would NOT have found this sub randomly by chance. Secondly, he said he was a fourth year student - you can assume he is in university, either at bachelor's, master's or …
/r/MensRights30/06/15 03:42 PM
11

If a man tells people he is suicidal, all but the most empathetic will stop talking to him. People treat men suffering mental health issues like lepers - everyone just wants to get away. Most people go through periods of poor mental health in life. I have been through them, and have learned the hard way that nobody wants to know about it. It is never of any benefit to share such problems with people, no matter how much feminists go on at men that they should open up about their feelings. The onl…
/r/MensRights30/06/15 03:23 PM
4

No, we're not jumping to conclusions. I'm writing a research paper about say, attitudes to divorce courts. I create a survey to discuss in my paper. I go to r/mensRights and ask users to complete. What other interpretation of what I've done is there? I've gone to r/mensRights to bias the results of my survey.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 03:12 PM
12

Very slowly, almost imperceptibly, the mainstream is starting to realise what a malevolent force neo-puritan internet activism is.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 03:09 PM
3

Fantastic. I can just imagine his paper: 94% of survey respondents felt [insert feminist policy point here] was a priority for the Australian government.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 02:54 PM
4

What does it matter about the questions? If your sample who completes it isn't random and you have preselected respondents from a highly biased subgroup, what kind of research is this?
/r/MensRights30/06/15 02:51 PM
35

Yup. When a woman murders her husband she's the real victim, because on top of feeling bad about what she did, she becomes a social outcast and sometimes has to go to jail.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 02:46 PM
10

Ta-da! We have a grammar troll. Pedantry is not a substitute for counter-argument.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 02:41 PM
5

I'm from the UK, and to try to argue that guns are as easy to come by as in the US, is frankly ridiculous. Just take a cursory look at gun ownership rates to correct any misconceptions you have please. The seemingly high rate in Sweden (still far below the rate in the US) is because of the vast rural wilderness in the country. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_of_guns_per_capita_by_country
/r/MensRights30/06/15 02:39 PM
9

In the bigger picture, I think it makes sense to keep arguing that alimony is idiotic and needs to be abolished. Neither men nor women should be receiving it. But perhaps the best route to abolishment is more high-earning women paying it. The law will change, as usual, when it suits women.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 11:07 PM
5

I think it should be made an automatic rule. If it isn't archived the post gets removed.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 10:39 PM
0

Nothing to do with men's rights. What the fuck is going on with this sub. Edit: don't just downvote, explain your point. What does this have to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 09:55 PM
4

I'll be first in line at the shop. I've slept with enough women in life - it's not worth the hastle any more. Not sure why this is getting down-voted, VR will work wonders for the men's movement in my opinion.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 02:42 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter