| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Because it's okay when they do it to usOne would be plenty. Do you have 1? (Objectors, that is.) | /r/MensRights | 12/02/18 08:01 AM |
| 1 | Because it's okay when they do it to usThat's what I am asking. Women said it bugged them. Have men said the same? Is it a problem for men? | /r/MensRights | 12/02/18 07:04 AM |
| 0 | Because it's okay when they do it to usYou have uncritically accepted that men and women are equal. In that case, there should not be any difference in the "objectification" of either sex. Swing and a miss. I am saying they are equally deserving of respect and worth listening to concerns. | /r/MensRights | 12/02/18 02:01 AM |
| -2 | Because it's okay when they do it to usRight, so when they raise a concern, it should be treated fairly regardless of sex. Have men raised an objection to being objectified thay is based on the act itself and not the unreciprocated invitation? | /r/MensRights | 12/02/18 01:38 AM |
| -7 | Because it's okay when they do it to usWhich standard? My understanding was that objectification was frowned on because it makes women (or some or something) feel uncomfortable. Does bulge speculation make men feel uncomfortable? Did I miss the standard? | /r/MensRights | 12/02/18 01:11 AM |
| -13 | Because it's okay when they do it to usSorry, is there something about this we [males] are bothered by? I don't understand. (I'm new and not a subscriber.) | /r/MensRights | 12/02/18 12:05 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter