TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Typical_Samaritan Archive

View 0 posts and 166 comments by Typical_Samaritan on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

This s a misapplication of the % gap.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 03:02 PM
2

The gap between "guy is immature, but attractive" and "guy is immature and not attractive" is itself time and experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 05:00 PM
3

Your question was "why wouldn't young women have the same mindset". The answer is because they're young and inexperienced.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 04:48 PM
18

The simple answer is that we're not talking about the future-version of a young dude. We're talking about a hypothetical young dude "now". There's also no guarantee that he'll eventually get there - either psychologically, emotionally, financially or in terms of his network.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 04:43 PM
6

Because they're young and inexperienced.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 04:40 PM
–

I am comfortable being an arrogant douche here. You can carry that however you want to.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 08:35 PM
–

I’ve NEVER progressed in terms of manager or ceo. Pretty much stayed at the same entry level position in all these jobs. This is actually a scathing indictment against you.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 03:22 PM
2

You'd probably get further along in your journey if you can find a way to turn this corner. For example: so what if men are hornier? What's the next step here?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 04:13 AM
4

The 1950s are both a historical and narrative aberration in human, and American history. And it's probably not the most reflective of how we have or should behave. And this is particularly true, because the narratives around dating and sexuality in the 50s are largely also not reflective of the practical realities of the 1950s themselves. That is, the myth of the 50s tends to overshadow the reality of the 50s.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/24 03:42 AM
23

In what universe is her divorcing him after being in a relationship, having his children and a decade-long marriage losing interest "quickly"? Your idea of "quickly" is crazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 11:13 PM
3

I don't see any point in arguing with your framing of my comment. It's disingenuous. But, good luck with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 08:08 PM
22

Not the person you're responding to. But I'd also conclude that this isn't a relationship that's building anywhere. If my significant other was creating unnecessarily and significant cost-prohibitive barriers to sharing life experiences together, then she's not a serious partner. She further can't consider me a serious partner either, if me not being included in those life experiences means very little to her. It's that simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 01:53 PM
2

Isn't this just a microcosm of the broader point? Look at where we are. You unilaterally decided to jump into a conversation uninvited, chose to be overly reductive in your initial response, and then made another decision to be argumentative when your reductiveness was pointed out to you. What positive outcome did your "being social" result in when nobody asked you, in this case? None.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 08:18 PM
2

Oh, is this where we have to pretend like we don't know we're talking about something other than just being social?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 07:49 PM
11

This was dismissed almost two months ago. Move on.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 05:53 PM
9

There's nothing about anybody else that entitles me to interject myself into their lives without their permission, or so much as their say-so.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 02:57 AM
7

I don't cold approach random strangers. Let her give you a signal to approach. If you've received no such signal, then don't approach.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 01:58 AM
24

Nothing on your list is of the sort that should result in consequences outside of, for example, a sex worker being paid for her work, a thank you and allowing her to go on with her life.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 09:59 PM
95

I don't really have anything fundamentally constructive to add to this conversation, except the opinion that this all sounds like some incredibly and irredeemably toxic flagellation. It's not even like this has anything to do with women. This is just about you and men like you wanting to feel unearned heroism, and beating women over the head with the cudgel of your psychological baggage, for deigning to live lives without you in it and therefore "stealing" that opportunity from you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/24 03:41 AM
2

So... you're just going to plagiarize a comment by Karen Straughan deliberately misrepresenting what someone said or wrote? That's the strategy?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/24 10:01 PM
10

First and foremost, I love Caetano Veloso. Happy to see another fan. Second, I think it's probably more energetically, emotionally and intellectually constructive to be responsive to real invocations of feminist thought, rather than making up things about feminism just because you may have heard a woman say something. The word "Feminism" has been largely stripped of meaning specifically across the manosphere, because it's now applied to basically anything a woman says or you think might say that…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/24 08:43 PM
3

If this was true, why is he out of prison? Romania has a statutory cap of 30 days to hold defendants. And that can be extended up to 6 months. Each extension requires an individual petition and approval. The Tates were ultimately held for 4 out of the possible six months. Their release was prosecutorial discretion. They still can't leave Romania. The trial date has not been set and the trial itself isn't expected to occur for another couple of years. It just takes time in Romania.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/24 01:21 AM
5

Rape is the kind mindset involving taking things without consent. That's like the lowest level. Taking things without consent. Where is the absence of consent involved in a man who: goes to onlyfans pays a subscription can pay for additional interactions of their choosing
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/24 01:06 AM
6

Just to be clear: Andrew Tate has been charged with sex trafficking and rape. And your response is.... a woman lying about liking someone is the same? If you had a hypothetical daughter, you're saying that a man who raped her would be just as bad as if your daughter lied to a guy about liking him?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/24 12:53 AM
3

And what's the woman-analog of a man who sex traffics, physically andf psychologically abuses women?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/24 12:48 AM
3

I'm curious to know what those scumbag ways of making money are.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/24 12:41 AM
1

Multiple issues with this, the first one being, if one person, say the man, goes into the relationship with far more assets, say he owns a house and cars and has substancial savings, while his wife goes into it with nothing. She suddenly will be "entitled" to a huge portion of his savings and assets. Each individual in the partnership is entitled to the marital assets, which are those assets that have accrued since the partnership was established. 2nd issue is if they want to divorce, suddenly y…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/24 05:04 PM
1

That comment wasn't used to justify my original comment. It was written to highlight how the specific example of a man bedding multiple women doesn't further the other person's position.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 06:14 PM
2

That response is to another comment and not the specific comment you responded to.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 05:00 PM
2

I'm looking at the specific comment I responded to correctly.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 04:30 PM
2

There's no contesting that. But, your response doesn't advance the proposition that women are undercounting their sexual partners. If 100 women are sleeping with one man, that's still just one man. The number of sexual partners for 100% of those women remains... one. So: the very situation you've outlined, where a man is bedding multiple women, is one in which a man has had more sexual partners than the women he's having sex with.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 04:02 PM
1

Women see 80% of men as bellow average This stat isn't true. But let's assume it is, so we don't have to argue about a decade old OKCupid post. If it's true, it would also stand to reason that women would ultimately have fewer sexual partners than men on average.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 02:14 PM
24

This is really just desperation and delusion. It's unfortunate that the circumstances of your life have gotten you to this point. But it's not going to get you what you want, which is the purpose of leverage. Your willingness to pay sex workers doesn't increase your desirability. It doesn't present genuine "alternatives"; since those alternatives are universally available to every single other man and woman in the world, and are therefore not unique to you or your status. They are singularly tem…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 10:12 PM
43

What is the leverage here? It just seems to be the case that if you're a man who has to resort to prostitution for sex, specifically, you're probably not the kind of man who was being considered by women to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 09:00 PM
1

I don't think the data suggests what you think it suggests. Further down, the author includes in their definition of "single" as someone who, in addition to never being married, is widowed or divorced. We also know that women tend to initiate the majority of divorce proceedings and men tend to predecease our romantic partners. So, this probably isn't as insightful a map to the idea of the wall as you're suggesting it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/24 03:19 PM
3

This seems like an unnecessary debate. Any opinion on either side has zero consequence.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/24 08:10 PM
1

I went out with a long-time female friend and a gay acquaintance two weeks ago. We ate food, bought chocolates and books to read. We're likely going to workout together next sunday.. Next saturday, I'm going to a fashion mall with three female friends to pickup a book, buy some clothes and grab something to eat. Tomorrow, I'll be playing online games with my two male best friends. One of them, I would have sex with. But it's not something that's on my mind when I see her. As a general rule, I'm …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 05:02 PM
0

Layla Jenner aside: yes, I would date an ex-pornstar.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 04:42 PM
10

People give all this bullshit "advice", but in 2020, 61% of all adults in the US reported feeling lonely. And that was before COVID. You all just do not read... for shit. I won't suggest the numbers are great. But it's not 61% of "all adults". It's 36% of all Americans and 61% of young adults have experienced extreme loneliness within (at the time) the four weeks prior to the questionnaire. And this was DURING the pandemic.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 03:22 AM
2

Yes, I would. "I'm not dating this woman because another guy mistreated her." is a wild thing to think. If hse was mean or a career criminal, sure. But because of the behavior of someone else towards her? Mad.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 05:48 PM
–

What are your solutions? Therapy. I'm being serious. These aren't the kinds of conversations or thoughts that well-adjusted people have. They're just not. Like, really. They're not.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 04:31 AM
1

Based on the article you provided, around 96% of men are in fact the biological fathers of their children.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 05:53 PM
1

Citation needed.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 05:45 PM
5

No. I've seen zero indication that people who subscribe to the red pill have had more dating success. After all, they're all still on the internet arguing and complaining about women. At some point, there should have been a matriculation point. But there doesn't ever seem to be one, except when people realize it's pretty dumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/24 09:09 PM
–

One of the responses I both agree with, and hate, is when a woman says "If you're broke, just say so." The "system" we have is most responsive to the biological realities of women, irrespective of their socioeconomic condition. You're asking a woman to hitch her cart to a man's proverbial horse before or with minimal indication that if she invests long-term with him, that he's able to actually carry the resource burdens for an entire family when or if she gets pregnant. The dating/courting perio…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/24 09:07 PM
3

Let me put it this way: It's probably a lot more psychologically healthy to be really-intentionally-consciously cognizant of the fact that women don't interact with some conceptual notion of an average man -- a man-as-idea that (and not who) can be argued about on the internet. They interact with real men, men of flesh and bone, who say things, believe things, put effort and energy out into the world. They are therefore attracted to or not-attracted to the men they interact with. If you find you…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/24 02:33 AM
4

You... didn't read the article you provided, did you?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 05:55 PM
–

It seems like any time you get too close to criticizing feminism and modern society people shut down the discussion. General critiques of feminism in the manosphere are often just anti-woman commentary and not specific to feminism, feminist writers or actual content of feminism. Why are the birth rates below replacement in all of the west? Because women aren't breeding factories. They're people. And modern social infrastructures allow them to express themselves more robustly. And that means they…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 01:23 PM
7

A clear proof of this is a study made on people who cheated. I'd love to see a citation for this study. In short; alpha fucks, beta bucks I think you should focus on making your argument a bit more robust--and reasoned. Who's the beta in this scenario? It can't be the married men or men in relationships. I mean, "in short", you've provided "evidence" that it's not just alphas, but betas who're fucking too. Because you've just told us they're cheating on their partners. If it's alphas and not bet…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 02:17 PM
0

Episode #486 of y'all need to get off the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 02:06 AM
7

while studies show only 36% of Men, 18% of Women Actually Know When They’re Being Flirted With This suggests that men are more likely to perceive flirtation than women. They literally will get approached, asked for their number, asked out -- little room for ambiguity here. Flirtation is rare during initial contact. That's also in the study you provided an article for. So, your summary here doesn't really jive with reality. Men are not in fact just going up to women and flirting with them... much…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 08:15 PM
0

Reading this and the comments serves as a reminder that this subreddit is filled with men who simply do not interact with women on any level in the real world.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 12:44 AM
4

tl;dr I'm going to scare you into fucking us, with bad and sometimes not-facts. Are you scared yet, will you fuck us?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/24 05:31 PM
–

Without a doubt.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/24 08:30 PM
–

Has anything about your life changed positively having made that observation? If not, let it go. It's really not that deep.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/24 08:10 PM
–

I‘ve been at the bar where a chick barely made eye contact with me, and if I didn’t have the confidence from being attractive to approach her I never would’ve known. So she's successfully filtered out a set of men she doesn't want to interact with. Good for her. Very rarely do they give you the hard fuck me eye or at least give you a strong sign that they are interested. Although you mentioned in another comment that this is hyperbole, this level of intense interest is extremely rare. Like, outs…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/24 03:57 PM
1

Pretty much all the women who were born here in the 70's and 80's have done the same. I can only speak to women born in the 80s... but as someone born in the 80s and grew up with these women... I have something to tell you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 07:15 PM
14

prestigious Master degree No one talks like this...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 05:39 PM
4

I just want to jump in on one thing. It is fucking insane that insisting that young boys be taught about... consent... is being used to highlight a problem of feminism. That is some abjectly and morbidly toxic shit. Let's take this thing that is objectively good and then imply that it's bad because... feminists assert it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/24 07:09 PM
3

The type of people who argue otherwise are the type of people who tend to not participate much in rich social lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/24 04:22 PM
1

What exactly is the debate here?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 06:31 PM
1

Yes, I love casual sex. Not sure if I'm just the weird one but the effort-to-reward ratio is absolutely abysmal. As compared to what? Almost all of the things we do in life have a disproportionately one-sided effort-to -reward ratio. With very few exceptions. And even in scenarios where it's easy, for every minute of pleasure, you're going to spend several minutes laying next to someone you don't even know and certainly don't care deeply about. Imagine for a moment that one of your major critiqu…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 07:05 PM
3

I think it's fair to say that it happens because of those traits. And the reasoning is pretty self-evident. They're young and don't know any better. On the one hand, you have young men who often don't have the emotional, psychological and interpersonal tools to display a more genuine form of confidence. And confrontational, aggressive behaviors are, for that stage of life, are easy fallbacks/alternatives to the more nuanced requirements of genuine confidence. I think it's fairly common for young…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/24 04:52 PM
-1

The word "boundary" has become something of a mantra at this point. Claiming that you're insecure is a critique of the underlying desire that needs to be satisfied by the boundary you're asserting. Just declaring that you "have boundaries" doesn't actually address the claim(s) about the underlying desire.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/24 04:29 PM
0

Right, so you're insecure. You just described insecurity by ostension my brother in humanity. You can carry that however you feel, but it is what it is. The accusation is accurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/24 03:48 PM
–

Correction. If she stays with him, it's because she couldn't get into a relationship with or keep her "real" first option. Or, if she stays with him and he has money, it's because she's using him as a beta bucks resource provider. But if he's broke, it's because he's an alpha chad. There is no room in the red pill for the breadth of totally normal human relationships we see out in the world. The Red Pill exists to give some men catharsis and a sense of control, neither of which they're capable o…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 11:11 PM
3

Modern daters tend to dramatically overstate how common men approaching random women was, from a historical perspective. It's not that normal and it's a very modern phenomenon.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 02:07 AM
–

but why is sleeping with a considerable amount of previous partners exempt from this discussion? ^^^^^^^^ It's the thesis of your post. You're just, as suggested, dancing around it the rest of the way. That's what you're really talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/24 06:13 PM
1

I don't care about marriage as an "institution". I think it's anachronistic and would rather highlight healthy coupling over the specific status of a legal arrangement. However, as of the most recent census, nearly 40% of children were born out of wedlock across the United States alone. And when you're talking about ~336 million people, that's basically 1 out of every 2 births or kids you're likely to meet in practice. So, the position still stands -- if you're the kind of person who values a le…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 09:12 PM
2

It might hold true. But I think that the people who repeat it the most don't know what they're talking about. None of them have experienced women their grandmothers age specifically as romantic or sexual (potential) partners. They just know them as grandmothers or older women. They have no real conception of their internal lives. And if you're an older millennial like me, you're experience of those women were strictly as grandmothers who also came from a time where the distance relationally was …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 03:50 PM
0

What makes housework comparable to paying for dates?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 06:34 PM
2

I love women with a good range of sexual experiences -- I think "promiscuous" carries in and of itself a negative connotation. Women with great sexual experience are generally more aware and communicative of their sexual wants and desires. Awesome.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 03:39 PM
2

Trust me No. I read this whole thing. You don't interact with a lot of women. And I'm not saying that to be rude.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 03:37 PM
1

This is not a thing that's going to happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/24 10:01 PM
9

I don't think any of those people "allowing themselves to escape" would argue that it replaces the feeling of real driving though. And that's both explicit and implicit in this scenario.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/24 09:59 PM
3

Numerous studies from Women that show casual sex is terrible for them. Best citation? It's also a scientific fact when a Man enters a women there is a exchange of DNA on top of an emotional affect on the Woman's brain, NOT the Mans. Study? Studies?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 05:33 PM
2

I think there are a couple of things to consider. These are deeply insecure men, whose symptoms are multifaceted. But they're also still humans. They still desire intimate companionship. That won't go away.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 04:56 PM
13

I think you should spend less time on the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 02:02 PM
–

Your response is tantamount to the authors of the Bible declaring that stars fall from the sky. It reveals a primordially fundamental misunderstanding of what they were observing.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 04:39 AM
–

Not even the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/24 08:48 PM
–

I was chatting up a pretty cute chick The moment you wrote "cute chick" is the moment I stopped taking this post seriously. She was quite clearly plenty interested in talking to me as she stuck around after her friends left to dance. I'm going to take your word as bond. You really did have a conversation with a woman you were interested in. But, no, she wasn't. Understand the facts here. She left. And she never came back. She wasn't that interested in continuing anything with you. You probably j…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/24 03:43 PM
–

I also want to add.... What is questionable about owning an Iphone, enjoying Drake's music and traveling? Since when are those by definition bad things? Even if 100% of women were like this... who travels and is like "you know what? fuck these other people, other cultures, other forms of architecture and art and anybody who likes different human experiences and expressions of life. Traveling is a red flag."
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/24 03:32 PM
11

Find a flaw in the logic here please. You haven't presented any logic. That being said, you just described a situation in which the odds are squarely in your favor of not getting herpes.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/24 06:44 PM
2

Consider this. It is probably the case that this isn't an issue worth bringing up. You're overstating how significant a problem this is, how important it is to discuss, how useful a discussion about it can be, and we ultimately have no way of determining the veracity of any of the claims you've made.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/23 03:24 AM
–

OP is socially awkward.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/23 05:33 PM
15

Women give more time and money to charities than men and I would think that a more reasonable metric for self-centeredness than... celebrity or hero worship.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 05:48 PM
7

My biased response is that those other men don't have the experience themselves to know what they're talking about. It's a purely intellectual position driven by other underlying rationale.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 01:40 AM
0

Inexperience being a red flag is largely "us" in this thread imposing it by virtue of OP characterizing it that way. Red flag can also just be shorthand for "shit I don't want to deal with". It doesn't matter if it's glaring, major or whatever. If it's the kind of thing that would stop you from dealing with someone, it would be fair to call that a red flag.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 01:35 AM
–

If you were to ask a woman about older men dating younger women, you will get a lot of pearl cluthing about how the man is a predator, creep, manipulator, etc. They feel older men target young women because the woman are too naive to put up with their bullshit. These are the reasons they cite for why such relationships are wrong. And they'd be correct. But I believe they are lying. You'd be wrong. You know, due to your age, you would never have a chance with him. I don't suspect that women are b…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 09:49 PM
4

I used to have a "team" or roster of women when I was in my middle 20s to early 30s. I'm 38 now and I don't anymore. But my reasons were as follows and still hold true to this day for the most part: Variety is more fun for me. The experience of different individuals is preferable to the acclimated sameness of a single individual. An average looking woman is quite attractive to me and the increase in the quality of the attractiveness of my partner has never translated to a better interpersonal ex…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 08:51 PM
–

One of the things we have to keep in mind is that the way in which societies develop culturally is similar to the manner in which technology develops. It's not symmetrical. It's not balanced. they develop based on where we focus our resources. Our concerns thus far have been largely political and economic. Women have earned the right to vote, participate in local and national politics, and enter the workforce. But the subsequent and sometimes underlying characteristics of those spheres have not …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 04:24 PM
7

I think it's also important to remember that 99% of people--men and women included--are not leaders. Even men in positions of authority are not necessarily men of leadership qualities. Those qualities are not denoted by genitalia.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 04:09 PM
–

You seem to want to carry this burden, so carry it how you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 02:13 AM
–

First, we're on the internet. That kind of gatekeeping is useless. Second, Never read a lick of Bell Hooks.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 10:59 PM
–

I'm a male feminist. What, do you need some bona fides? I gotta' start throwing out shit from Woman on the Edge of Time or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 10:44 PM
1

I'm a male feminist. Some of you obsess over and comment on some of the dumbest things.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 09:27 PM
5

And the statement, literally every old man would be factually inaccurate. Even the presumption that most had to go to war would be factually inaccurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 06:58 PM
5

Most men did not in fact have to go to war in our grandfathers' time. So, whatever the case is.... it's an inaccurate statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 06:56 PM
4

I think that OP is secretly thinking of World War II and doesn't realize that those are no longer "grandparents". they're great grandparents. And in some cases great-great grandparents. "The War". Like... what "The War"?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 05:52 PM
8

Men back in grandpa's day actually had to go to war. This is quite an exaggeration. The average age of a grandparent today is 47. That's 9 years older than me. We're talking about dudes who were fighting in the early portion of Operation Iraqi Freedom and the War in Afghanistan. And that's all voluntary. So I'm curious as to who you're actually talking about when you write that they had to go. Which war did they "have to go to"?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 05:50 PM
–

The short answer is that it becomes deception when it's inauthentic. A lot of men (people in general, but this was prompted by a woman's commentary on men) are very willing to be inauthentic in presenting themselves to women, if it increases their potential for early access to a woman's time and attention. I am outgoing: I enjoy hiking, running and playing soccer. I do not like concerts, or large social gatherings. She is outgoing: she enjoys going to social events like brunches with friends and…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 04:50 PM
1

I disagree so strongly with this.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 03:54 PM
2

That doesn't address the concern.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/23 03:19 PM
5

Can't what?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/23 01:36 AM
9

So, the answer is no. Okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/23 01:27 AM
6

A better question is do you have any examples of a man masturbating in public and being defended for it? Come on dude. That's not a better question. You're making a claim. You're being asked to provide evidence in support of the claim. Can you or can you not provide that evidence?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/23 01:19 AM
4

Do you have an actual example of a woman and a man both masturbating in public with different outcomes? And is the response consistent across multiple iterations of both acts? That is, do we see multiple examples of women masturbating in public and man masturbating in public with consistently different responses? I'm trying to see if there is indeed significant disparities in the way people like these are treated based on their gender. Do you have an example of a mentally ill or drug addicted du…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/23 01:10 AM
11

Do you have an actual example of a woman and a man both masturbating in public with different outcomes? And is the response consistent across multiple iterations of both acts? That is, do we see multiple examples of women masturbating in public and man masturbating in public with consistently different responses?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/23 01:00 AM
1

here, as in, what do you hope to achieve with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/23 04:53 PM
1

Stretch marks isn't an issue. The loose skin is. I don't find it attractive. I actually had a work/brunch meeting with a friend and we talked about this very thing. She took offense to my answer. We are not friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/23 03:59 PM
10

It's because historically the majority of men have not approached women outside of explicitly formal events intended for pairing or family-initiated pairings. The men who did approach would be exactly the kinds of men you'd expect to approach today in a more stereotypical sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/23 03:10 PM
1

What do you consider success here?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/23 02:19 PM
3

This is just sociopathy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/23 07:25 PM
6

I don't know what country you are from but in the USA there are ample social studies that show a very clear picture, and not just those self surveys (which also corroborate what OP is saying) actual actions, divorces, why they are so Ample? What are your best ones? As a whole, the longevity of a relationship can be correlated by the distance in income and education between the man and the woman. Citation? There is however no mentality change happening here, I see quite the opposite, telling wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 11:14 PM
1

I'm not a passportbro or sex tourist. But I have lived in Slovakia for short of 5 years. I'm a Jamaican/American citizen. The short answer is no. The longer answer is also no.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 08:35 PM
–

It still shows how even the neutral subreddits have a huge misandry problem. Being able to find a few, marginally tepid and negative critiques of someone is not indicative of a "misandry" problem. Anywhere. Especially when the overwhelmingly vast majority of the nearly 4 and a half thousand comments in that post alone is not that.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 06:50 PM
–

I asked you to pick the worst one. That's the one you picked.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 06:39 PM
–

This is the worst you found? And to you, "Gosh, I wonder why dudes are so lonely these days." is equivalent to misandry, flaming, treating someone like Hitler, treating men as disgusting, and is representative of the general sentiments of the commentary to the post? Or, do you think you're maybe exaggerating just a little?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 06:32 PM
–

I checked the post and they're flaming the dude. No, they're not. They are treating him like he's Hitler or something. No... they're not. Some of the top comments are generalising men saying that men are disgusting I promise you, they're not. This is the top comment. It's totally reasonable. Of the "top comments" that you think are referring to men as disgusting, share the link to the worst you can find.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 06:24 PM
1

Being confident is more closely related to self-esteem and not self-worth. But, the single and presumably best example you provide isn't even an example of what people mean when we normatively use the phrase "self-worth". Self-worth defines our internalized sense of personhood in relation to the world around us. it informs how we present, how we allow others to present towards and therefore treat us and helps to maintain the stability of our presentation across interpersonal experiences--and not…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 05:58 PM
3

So, you didn't read what I wrote or didn't understand it. Which is it?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 05:21 PM
4

Your position is unreasonable.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 03:39 PM
–

Narrator: The subreddit did not, in fact, go wild.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 02:58 PM
17

This is largely an issue of sufficiency and necessity. Having a social life, anywhere between alright to rich, is a necessary condition of dating. You got to be out there. And in doing so, you inherently increase the number of potential partners you'll encounter by being social. So, it is good advice. That it doesn't work out in a romantic sense simply tells us that it isn't sufficient. And that's true too. Sometimes being out there isn't enough to translate platonic feelings into romantic or se…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 02:01 PM
8

"Filtering out fuckboys" is a really dumb excuse for expecting men to pay for nice dinner dates If you follow up that with the following: Time is valuable, and if a man is just looking to get his dick [wet?] it's doubtful he will tough it out, especially if he isn't ugly and has options. You've then proven it a successful strategy. Expecting men to pay for nice dinners is nothing short of parasitism. Not really. And it's not an insignificant expense either, since a full meal with drinks at a nic…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 01:23 PM
–

How is it beside the point when the study focused on the difference between male and female orgasms derived from sex multiple times? Now, I wouldn't say that the issue of orgasms specifically are at issue here, but overall sexual enjoyment. That being said, it's (overall enjoyment) not beside the point. OP hasn't read the study. They couldn't have read the study and made that claim unless they're just outright lying about the study itself. The study author(s) forward your concern as one reason e…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 04:23 PM
9

It wasn't easy for them and they need a boogieman to explain why.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/23 03:18 PM
1

One of the things the other study in the article pointed out is that men's profiles tend to be lackluster at best. We tend to take and/or select poor images of ourselves to represent our appearance and there's room to develop the kind of content we fill our profiles with, for the better. if a woman can't tell what we look like and we don't have any interesting information to read, then they're going to swipe left. It's not magic. The major point about the OkCupid study is that it can't be used t…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 05:22 PM
1

yes there is other influences that are not being controlled for, that doesn't mean that the conlusion is wrong. Dude... you provided the study. You're now critiquing the limitations of the study you provided when it doesn't actually support your specific claim. You have yet to demonstrate that it is even accurate. And other studies looked at face ratings and rating men and found women will rate men low in attractiveness until such a point they get to know them, then they rate men in similar prop…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/23 09:35 PM
1

No... they wouldn't. Hence the misrepresentation of these survey. They're not actually gauging men's attractiveness. They're gauging what drives a swipe right or a swipe left.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/23 08:51 PM
1

As is consistent with men in the Red Pill... and what I've uncovered on this subreddit: y'all do not read the sources you cite. That article sucks. The first cited study looked at women's swiping trends on Tinder. What they uncovered isn't that women think only 20% of men are attractive. Or even that 80% are below average. What they reported is that the primary drivers of men's profiles being rejected were significant age gaps (both older and younger) and men's faces on their profiles being low …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/23 08:46 PM
2

lol... this is not a thing. There is no evidence whatsoever that women find 80% of men below average. I know very well the source of the claim. But it is (1) a gross extrapolation and (2) a misrepresentation of the survey.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/23 08:00 PM
2

5.25% is not surprising since women rate 80% of men <5 This is not a thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/23 07:56 PM
1

Yerp. A woman attends a ball. She's like, "Hey all you sexy hunks. I want to get married." She's like 15, so she doesn't really know what she's talking about. But she's horny because of 15 and this is like the only way to get some dick. A sexy hunk goes to the ball and watches her and shit -- in a very work appropriate kind of way. He wants to let her know that he's a sexy hunk. Then he discusses his interest in her. If the girl's parents think everything is copacetic, the sexy hunk and the girl…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/23 07:55 PM
4

There's no double standard. A simple review of the two posts would make that plainly obvious.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/23 07:44 PM
1

There's a lot of accurate psychology in redpill ideology Since I've joined this particular subreddit, I've encountered a number of instances where red pill or red pill-adjacent posters have misconstrued or simply misunderstood studies that they're using to form the bases of their positions. This is consistent with Red Pill content creators as well. So I'm not convinced this is true. My view of the red pill is that it's a driver of catharsis more than anything else, particularly for the consumers…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/23 12:39 PM
1

If you go out in public, you don't have a right to your privacy. You don't have a right to not be made uncomfortable. This staring at strangers. Doesn't make the above an entitlement That thing. Can =/= entitled So: Sure it is. No, it isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 05:35 PM
30

The videos you shared aren't that situation though. So return next week.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 03:40 PM
23

None of those characteristics are an entitlement to staring at strangers.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 03:39 PM
9

It's not really that subjective.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 03:33 PM
61

I think that both of those men, the first man in particular, were being creepy. Yes, it is 100% weird to just stare at other people in silence and ogle their legs. Normal people say hello, you give the other person a disinterested smile and you go about your day. But if you genuinely find the other person attractive, you should probably say something. Use words. Evolution has gifted us with this amazing ability to communicate. And instead, these dudes--strangers to these women--are just staring …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 03:26 PM
9

Acknowledges the marked disparity between male and female attention received on apps Same study tells us that dating apps are crap measures of attractiveness and men should put in more work on their profiles, because they fucking suck. Acknowledges a trend from 2002-2023 that has concentrated sexual activity further into smaller groups The study looked at a broad cohort of currently sexually active individuals. Of that cohort, it was observed that the top 5% of sexually active individuals were t…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 03:52 AM
5

Think of a curve on a chart. The number of sexual partners isn't distributed equally. Some people in the "woman" group are having a lot of sex. Some are not. Some people in the "man" group are having a lot of sex. Some are not. At a gini index of .58 versus .60 (a lower number means more equal distribution), the "woman" group looks very very very very slightly less curved than the "man" group.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 03:50 AM
2

That's marital property, you get half of his at divorce. This isn't accurate. Only the portion accrued during the marriage is available for distribution. And how much is dependent on state laws. Most states are equitable distribution and not community property states. This means that even of the distributable portion of a 401k, it's not likely going to be 50% that a spouse receives. You don't build a social security fund, payroll taxes from workers get redistributed to the elderly who collect so…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 12:05 AM
1

But... what exactly are you referring to?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/23 09:29 PM
15

This makes sense, you know, like, if you didn't watch the movie.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/23 08:03 PM
0

Zero percent of studies actually show this.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/23 06:39 PM
1

Twerking, songs about wet pussies, thirst traps, Onlyfans... all of this is inescapable today. What kind of world are you trying to live in!? When Ben Shapiro raised this issue he became a subject of mass mockery, even if he did it from a conservative angle. He got ridiculed for very specific things, including an alleged discussion with his doctor wife to prove that vaginas shouldn't get so wet without diseases. In response to a song. Because that's a significant marker for him and his dry-p*ssy…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/23 12:43 AM
11

Just to be pedantic: the old fashioned chivalric codes around courtly love quite literally revolved around women, as both objects of courtly love and the arbiters and judges of what it (chivalric courtly love) constituted. So, it's odd to believe something like, "old fashion chivalry has nothing to do with women".
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/23 08:34 PM
14

There is a difference between having a boundary and what occurs after that boundary has been articulated. If you do not want to tolerate a partner who posts bikini pictures (presumably through social media), then your responsibility is to communicate that those kinds of posts make you feel uncomfortable, and that the kind of attention your bikini-posting partner is receiving leaves you insecure. Attempting to make someone else to acquiesce to your demands and conform in order to satisfy your own…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 07:59 PM
3

There's no shortage of data that supports this. There's actually very limited evidence to support the claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 01:45 AM
11

Some of you are utterly debased and terrifying.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/23 07:11 AM
0

And yes, one of each 3 responses in this sub, or in general to not-bluepill topics boils down to 'Have you tried to treat women as human beings?' Do you have an actual example of this occuring, where the loaded question (or outright allegation) was used simply as a thought-terminating question and not within a specific contextual backdrop of gendered reductionism?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/23 02:24 AM
21

Do you know why a lot of women use "I have a boyfriend"? It stops the guy from having to ask why she doesn't want him. And it allows her to exit the conversation without having to explain why she's not--or no longer--interested and navigate the potential pitfalls of dealing with unhealthy men. For every dude who will say "No doubt, thanks for the conversation and I hope you have a nice evening" when a woman says no, there's another dude who's going to ask her why, or what he did wrong, or get ho…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/23 12:50 AM
2

That's overly generic and unhelpful.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/23 06:23 PM
6

No, I'm saying that we are doing that already! Well, most of us. People are often mistaken. It is just a personal attack against someone to stop any discussion from being had. I don't think I've ever heard someone being told to treat women like human being in some random, decontextualized experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/23 05:38 PM
3

So.... are you against treating women like human beings?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/23 05:28 PM
5

The short answer: disconnect from the manosphere. This shit is like a fucking cult at this point. Take the US census for example. Amongst married couples, the median household income is less than $100,000. Take a moment to think about that. Women in the United States are very readily marrying regular, average Joe-Schmoe dude off the street. He isn't doing anything fancy; he doesn't have a high paying job. Joe is just a dude making average, every-day income. And what are you left with? Not the re…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/23 07:58 PM
2

You didn't read the source materials for the citations here either, did you? I see a trend developing.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 11:39 AM
6

The study you posted doesn't support your position. What the authors were observing doesn't even relate to your position on women being "harlots".
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 04:50 AM
2

I think that physically conforming is a significant part of gender. But I wouldn't say that gender is therefore determined by that physical conformity. Robin Williams remained a man during his role as Mrs. Doubtfire, as an actor, and as the character, Daniel Hillard, in the film. As far as the film goes, the presentation was largely performative. this also goes back to Sheakespearian theater. All dudes -- even for the female roles. Were the dudes suddenly not dudes? Probably not in most cases. S…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 02:00 PM
2

Is the woman above a man to you? Except for this conversation, how would you be able to tell the difference in her case?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 08:44 PM
2

He doesn't need to change his biology to be a man. That's my point. Just like the person below is undoubtedly a woman. <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 07:33 PM
1

I mean, they clearly do. Here is a correlate: a man who is not male. I may also be lying. But my point here is that gender is a set of presentments in public and private life that correspond to expected roles of sexes in a society. I don't know anyone's sex just by looking at them, but I can estimate their gender based on how they present themselves to the world around them. You say, "That girl/woman over there" not because you've seen her genitalia, but because of how that person makes presenta…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 03:04 AM
0

What about women who aren't female?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/23 06:13 PM
23

Some of the video author's points are not good, beginning with his explanation of why there is a double standard for sexual activity.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/12/14 01:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter