TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Tzeentch_Gnosis Archive

View 20 posts and 144 comments by Tzeentch_Gnosis on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
49

Tzeentch_Gnosis/r/TheRedPill25/10/17 11:06 PM
19

Tzeentch_Gnosis/r/TheRedPill03/01/18 04:49 PM
17

Tzeentch_Gnosis/r/TheRedPill02/12/17 12:06 AM
10

Tzeentch_Gnosis/r/TheRedPill17/10/17 01:47 AM
3

Tzeentch_Gnosis/r/askTRP22/10/17 11:34 PM
2

Tzeentch_Gnosis/r/TheRedPill25/10/17 12:01 AM
2

Tzeentch_Gnosis/r/askTRP13/12/17 12:35 AM
2

Tzeentch_Gnosis/r/askTRP17/10/17 01:09 AM
2

Tzeentch_Gnosis/r/askTRP17/10/17 01:21 AM
1

Question for RedPillTzeentch_Gnosis/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/18 06:59 AM
1

Tzeentch_Gnosis/r/askTRP16/02/18 07:31 PM
1

Tzeentch_Gnosis/r/askTRP22/10/17 02:57 PM
0

Tzeentch_Gnosis/r/askTRP18/10/17 02:04 AM
0

Tzeentch_Gnosis/r/askTRP18/10/17 02:15 AM
0

Tzeentch_Gnosis/r/askTRP27/11/17 06:47 PM
0

MetaTzeentch_Gnosis/r/TheRedPill18/01/18 02:03 PM
0

CultureTzeentch_Gnosis/r/TheRedPill07/01/18 08:50 PM
0

Red Pill TheoryTzeentch_Gnosis/r/TheRedPill08/01/18 06:02 AM
0

Tzeentch_Gnosis/r/TheRedPill08/01/18 06:36 AM
0

Tzeentch_Gnosis/r/askTRP12/02/18 01:42 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

According to hot or not, I'm HB 9.
/r/askTRP16/02/18 07:47 PM
1

I guess that's not the question here. But if you break the mold you have to back up the cheesy things you say preferably with body language.
/r/askTRP12/02/18 08:58 PM
1

I've noticed something similar at my college.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/18 04:20 PM
3

I mean when a woman is hot, she can be feminine, she can be sexy, she can have that energy that makes you want to bend her over ... And so on.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/18 04:18 PM
1

Holmstrom (1992) summarizes his review by saying that indirect strategies were observed among female great apes during the following three circumstances: In the power struggle among females, by cannibalistically feeding on the competitor's offspring; against the male, in sexual contexts by refusal of cooperation to sexual access; also in competition for food, and feeding on the male's offspring; through the offspring, by rearing the young and transmitting models of behavior from one generation t…
/r/askTRP12/02/18 03:57 AM
2

Be careful! Girls become the good girl you want them to be. If you want honesty, maintain a discreet and non-judgmental demeanor, getting framed as alpha not BB by being refreshingly secure and realistic for instance etc.
/r/askTRP27/01/18 10:58 PM
3

An intelligent man is USUALLY a nerd starved for pussy hence his shock and resentful attitudes when he sees one that isn't. Being unable to attract women means they possess low SMV which makes them more satisfied, pining etc with said individual. A desperate man will do anything to keep the what he's found cause he's in drought. Real intelligence realizes the BS in this study.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/18 05:52 PM
1

You are immensely plugged in. If you use the word "statistically" one would expect some sources but no. Marriage is currently in complete disarray. It is WOMEN who are (1 in 5 on antidepressants) and massively unhappy. It is NOT mutual at all. Men are unhappy if they are involuntary celibates who aren't desired, can't get sex etc. No one besides your infantile ass needs to be in a relationshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/18 05:38 PM
1

First of all, it says the contrary, the studies I posted that men aren't the ones who want relationships it's women because with most men women exchange sex for stuff. The relationship is an exchange on that front. Feminism was initially sold as a sexual utopia which it was for the 20% but not the 80% of men. This is what the study says ... Wake up. It doesn't support your agenda-ridden blue pill mindset. Men aren't "happier" in any relationships. If you desperately need one that much you have s…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/18 05:32 PM
3

That's simply because a higher degree of narcissism is normalized in women and is not called out as such.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/18 08:24 AM
1

But this is hypergamous narcissism. It's inverted narcissism. Matt Forney wrote about this on Return of Kings, that's what I want from women to conquer and consume them. To engulf them.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/18 08:23 AM
1

Wrong. Women DON'T excel at social intelligence nor intellectual intelligence. Or maybe but it's relative. They aren't better than us at any major thing. We are anisogamous. The point of a man is his genetic distinctness and the point of a woman is her fertility, sorry to any equalists but this is how nature intended. Science vs feminism.com/ sex differences in general intelligence. So much so that the strongest woman was beaten by average men, 99.9% of women cannot beat the average man. The sex…
/r/TheRedPill24/01/18 04:35 PM
1

It's also approximately dysgenic as women usually don't fuck the extremely mentally feeble, the heavily physically handicapped or the terminally ill. The beta leftist last men who possess nothing of substance simply light the flames (raise the children or partial children of cads). Great men are forged in fire, it is the privilege of betas to light the flames. That's why they enjoy cuckoldry, seeking the blue pill mindset and women "just to chat" especially since they have no friends and are sev…
/r/TheRedPill24/01/18 03:51 PM
2

Kelly and Dunbar (2001) had 120 subjects (aged 18-55 yrs) rate eight profiles of imaginary male personalities designed to portray the presence or absence of the qualities of altruism or bravery. They found that altruistic males were preferred for long-term relationships and friendships. But for short-term liaisons (i.e., flings or affairs) females preferred non-altruistic, risk-prone, and brave males to altruistic, risk-averse, or non- brave males, and that men were aware of these preferences. N…
/r/TheRedPill24/01/18 03:45 PM
1

Men use power to get sex, women use power to avoid sex. Probably Colttaine's gender attraction differential is a good add-on. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF00287522 In areas where women outnumber men they have more casual sex and like men less (resentment). The huge fall in women's happiness MAY be linked to that. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2010.01177.x
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/18 02:07 PM
3

It's a transient emotion besides neurological Psychopaths never get angry, hot under the collar, or lose their cool. It's all manipulative. True, they respond to frustration but it's always an impulse rather than a real emotion.
/r/TheRedPill21/01/18 03:57 PM
1

Unicorns DON'T exist. Why? There are variable traits and there are general traits (say, sex traits like all women have XX chromosomes). You won't find one without it. Transgenders being what they are and not strictly "women". We don't know what is a variable trait or a general trait yet. We know via the studies of mate choice copying and Do women like women more than men like men that women use social proof to a higher degree than men. They look to others and copy them. Emulate, try to outdo but…
/r/TheRedPill21/01/18 03:54 PM
-3

The higher we soar the smaller we seem to those who cannot fly.
/r/TheRedPill19/01/18 02:28 PM
1

It's not BASED on competitiveness. Competition breeds a power-law/pareto distribution that means that a select few is just THAT much more productive naturalistically than most other people or most people are just THAT incompetent. The competition is a naturalistic distributed computing device that orders hierarchically. Quintile of population Income in 1989 Richest 20% 82.70% Second 20% 11.75% Third 20% 2.30% Fourth 20% 1.85% Poorest 20% 1.40%
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/18 05:08 AM
1

If this were true why do Weinstein and the others have to ejaculate in pots before disgusted females, beg women to sex them and get into all those nasty altercations? Obviously, there IS a difference. There are videos of even Justin Bieber getting rejected and celebrities too. Why did rich men seek Mystery's help in the game even a handsome, rich guy. It proves at the very least you can be better.
/r/TheRedPill19/01/18 05:03 AM
1

Not just doing more work but doing a much better job (i.e a much better model - a 30 mph as opposed to a 5 mph) than any of the others ranked below you.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/18 05:00 AM
7

In every hierarchy, there is a secret society that enjoys vastly greater rewards at a great level of ease. According to Vilfredo Pareto and Thorstein Verblen's Theory of Leisure Goods. Any system of organization or economic structure generates his own elites. The massive inequality that would be created by a purely libertarian system is massive. Sapolsky says that 5% of males are responsible for 95% of the matings but on dating sites it's more like 87.79% with the last two tiers being in the sin…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/18 12:35 AM
-2

I never talked about HOW I assumed you already fucking were. Secondly, I never said one should get married. I said that LTRs with approximate NAWALTs would be nice once in a while if only to drop her in 24 months or when she brings up the concept of marriage or commitment. "There's only one way ..." It's called imagination that you don't have to. That's another. "What I've read and watched" are you an illiterate? This shit doesn't make any sense. If you can't handle general rules and abstraction…
/r/TheRedPill19/01/18 12:15 AM
0

Yeah, if you can't see the content. It's not a source problem.
/r/TheRedPill19/01/18 12:08 AM
1

Well, Casanova is recommended as lifestyle advice for a young man finding his way in the world. But the others are just pornography which might give one ideas if they are into S&M.
/r/askTRP18/01/18 10:20 PM
2

On a societal level, I agree with what Queen Victoria ordained. She avoided marriage dissolution, class envy etc. by saying that people should observe a conservative propriety at least in public that would ensure efficient running. For Instance men and women used to use same sex bathrooms and wash naked together and many things were in disarray because of it. She created undergarments for men "drawers" and "knicker bockers" for women. It back fired in that in actuality it was going on more rathe…
/r/MensRights18/01/18 04:56 PM
1

Got a blowie at eight. My uncle was a decently famous rock star who had groupies. Also fucked my first girl at twelve when I black mailed the maid and au pair with money during their financial problems (California so tryout actresses and porn stars) I had read Moll Flanders, Casanova, the Pearl, Fanny Hill, Index Librorum Prohibitorum, Marquis de Sade ( 120 days of Sodom & Justine), the Lustful Turk and the Decameron so I took them for a ride. They taught me a lot. About $1500 is what I paid the…
/r/askTRP18/01/18 03:51 PM
4

The right woman for LTRs that's why I said cut out the infidelity parts like partner count from the link. Adam Levine was being half truthful half machiavellian. As it lowers SMV to say you're a "sleaze" who won't get married. But it's half truthful in that it's hard to even find an ideal under the right circumstances which often means virgins and/ or low partner count and a very good pre-nup of the "I am the alpha" model. You CAN'T say I won't get married and state honest reasons why. That's no…
/r/TheRedPill18/01/18 03:32 PM
1

Girl Game # I don't care: Heartiste says never suck a dick before he penetrates you if you want a Disney ending. She was never going to get one but still, she could have still played all THOSE cards right. But whatever.
/r/TheRedPill18/01/18 11:20 AM
1

Not that simple. Dominance is not necessarily correlated with other rated attractiveness in female partners. It is possible that women who expect to have daughters require more parental investment in the father as opposed to seeking dominant males if they want sons. Perhaps even choosing between both in one partner. And they do have sons because they are usually more dominant themselves and marry further up in SES than non dominant women. However they did mention the parents as in those who marr…
/r/TheRedPill17/01/18 03:23 AM
1

Their neurotic reality cannot handle that others believe other things and there's no definite conclusion that their beliefs are correct especially since they are primarily NOT trying to logically make sense of the world but are emotionally doing so. Often times, the ghost limb of a lost integrity they long cauterized the wound of severance of needs a pseudointellectual argument like you can't define races, it's a social construct. You haven't defined it. What is it? But this only makes one look …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/18 03:49 AM
3

I think it runs deeper than society creating some kind of fairy tale for women. It is a kind of security most women crave so much and there's no analogy to that. I guess it's a basic need for some women like owning a house. She has to have hypoagentic hooks in at least one man so she can feel tethered and stuff. I saw a poll where only 37% of Women wanted to get married or saw it as a realistic attainable goal as opposed to 18% of men looking to get married. 37% is not the majority so I don't th…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/18 03:09 AM
1

It's the Society we are living in. Without any social comeuppance unless also biological such as hitting the wall at which case we'd have to entertain some betas and their whiteknighting moral superiority. We can pursue biological attractiveness without social drawbacks. By we I mean women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/18 03:04 AM
1

There have been Female Leaders though not one in twenty so mistake still.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/18 10:52 PM
1

First of all, https://youtu.be/T9znJxgY2B8 1:36 . It's a scientific fact. Another is the study that homosexual genes increase fitness in heterosexuals. I read it on Twitter think you could search it. The Chinese experiment worked, so did Maslow's and the like. I think most are simply faking their personalities and you can work with a squishy ball but you'll always need it. You aren't fluidly dominant, you've taught yourself to relax in thus situation cause etc etc The 5% thing is pretty precise,…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/18 09:07 AM
-1

https://youtu.be/T9znJxgY2B8 1:36
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/18 08:50 AM
-1

Sapolsky https://youtu.be/T9znJxgY2B8 1:34
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/18 08:50 AM
1

Yeah Yeah. The threat of the Cold War still happened and war would have broke out if not for mutually assured destruction. There were a series of wars that could have gone global save for mutually assured destruction. The EU, UN etc couldn't have done shit alone. Syria, Russia, Iran and North Korea is small proof of that. It was the hippies who promoted world Peace and globalization. They were predominantly feminists. Feminists and their antagonism to free competition is what caused the fall of …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/18 12:39 AM
1

I addressed yours as well. In the environment where there are more Females than males. Males have greater choice and the hottest get chosen more. Like you choose to play your favorite game more, or eat your favorite food more if given a choice of any. In other research, men use power to have sex, while women use power to avoid sex, and women in environments where women outnumber men have more casual sex, and like men less. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00287522 http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/1…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/18 12:00 AM
-2

You can prove it or you can't is silly and very narrow minded. There's something called fuzzy logic. Science is thus NOT straight forward because of fuzzy logic being a thing. My last comment was educated speculation. It is called logical deduction. In the Society we are living in today, it's going to take a while before it's tested in humans as it is illegal for a father to try and test if a child belongs to him which can result in arrest and huge fines. In America, you have to pay up anyways s…
/r/TheRedPill09/01/18 11:43 PM
0

“We don’t know yet whether this applies to other species,” explains author of the study, Dr Angela Crean. Not it doesn't. Now it's survival of the fittest. Evolution. So if the cads who are more valuable on the dating market get to sleep with her first and fastest etc then wouldn't it be better for evolution if his genes get passed on instead of some beta chump? That's not exactly evolutionary. We know Microchimerism exists and if the DNA is absorbed why not fertilized? If it's seen evolutionari…
/r/TheRedPill09/01/18 09:35 PM
0

Yeah, you'd know about projection as such a pathetic excuse for a critical thinker. The title clearly states SEXUAL partners, the Study states SEXUAL partners. Is this how hard it was educating you where ever you went to university cause I doubt you learnt how to research. Can't even look up a study you're damn self and READ and if you did the last time, properly THIS time. You're a pathetic excuse of a microbiologist. Read: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.12373/abstract The link …
/r/TheRedPill09/01/18 09:07 PM
1

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19485565.2011.615172 indicated that beautiful women hook up less because women tend not to want too and use sexual economic power to gain long term relationships. In an environment with that many scarce males the unattractive ones don't get chosen as much so they decide who gets more sex as well. Men have the power. Hook up with Jessica Valenti or Scarlett Johannsenn? The latter gets picked. Men will fuck plain janes but only if there aren't better options. So you eat y…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/18 09:02 PM
1

Nope. Both generally want something good and men are more rational to their place in the market whilst women are hypergamous. Men usually gravitate to the watering holes that have served them with pussy in the past, all the way to being content with a blow-up doll. But women would be depressed, resentful, would remain single bemoaning the lack of men cause others are invisible etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/18 06:52 AM
1

College is oversupply of Females compared to men so women have to give it up more to be competitive.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/18 06:32 AM
1

Chateau Heartiste cited a study in a post that smart, educated women were the most promiscuous of all. In the comment section for why we don't value intelligence, many smart women confirmed similar stories of desperation due to scaring males away. This is another factor. https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2012/02/15/hypergamy-sluts-and-smart-women/ May be a reaction to the hard Truth that intelligence lowers a woman's SMV for most men. This affects them though they are more imaginative thus more Hy…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/18 06:09 AM
2

http://time.com/3461485/how-previous-sexual-partners-affect-offspring/ There is now. It is possible. It doesn't require impregnation just sex.
/r/TheRedPill09/01/18 05:30 AM
-2

http://time.com/3461485/how-previous-sexual-partners-affect-offspring/ Learn to read accurately or post a fucking study that states that the female must be impregnated. The study stated that the mechanism existed and was therefore possible. End of Story. Just because you majored in something doesn't make you automatically abreast with all new findings. Have you heard of specialization within subfields? Nope? You probably read up or didn't the way others did and it doesn't sit right with your bel…
/r/TheRedPill09/01/18 05:29 AM
-2

You are a special kind of denying whining loser who can't handle correct answers. You are a special kind of idiot who is just like the liberal "it's a social construct" deniers but of a different shade.
/r/TheRedPill09/01/18 04:57 AM
2

Be so powerful, effective, dominant that it supercedes all groups you're in. A sigma who outshines formal rank and privilege. An agentic superhero (Superman) who can make himself easy enough to be with though he doesn't slow down his life in general for anyone and there's never a dull ... Most of the time everything about him stands out. He creates an aura of power in his movements, general atmosphere etc. Definition of agentic and communal traits here: https://books.google.com/books?id=_XGLAgAA…
/r/TheRedPill08/01/18 02:49 PM
0

I don't care for that frame of yours. Most married men have or will be cheated on. [Profile of the Cosmopolitan Woman, 1980 p254] 80% of Women already 1 to 5 years into their marriages had already had more than one extra martial affair. The divorce rate climbs to 93.4% in the next 5 years of said marriage. So the faithful 20% yield to temptation there too. Affairs are concrete certainties in all marriages unless you take personal precautions lock her up. Read Michelle Langley's Female Infidelity…
/r/TheRedPill08/01/18 02:39 PM
1

Conor McGregor is too much of a dullard to be a good lover, he's not socially and intellectually calibrated enough. I see seasoned women not falling for him. Conor McGregor and Marion Cotillard?
/r/TheRedPill08/01/18 02:25 PM
-5

I created this ultimate limit so you soyboys can aim higher. I defined perfection.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/18 02:25 PM
-9

I meant the SMV difference is too high for any woman to demand to be his queen cause no woman is that self secure from constant threat especially when she does get married when she realizes she no longer gets the same male attention. It's like Don Draper in the first seasons, James Bond. It's a guy so high in value that women understand a necessity about his attainability and even actresses are like groupies to him from Personality and personal power alone.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/18 02:23 PM
-14

Do you recognize so little of yourself here that you have to shit on it?
/r/TheRedPill08/01/18 02:19 PM
-1

Okay, don't appreciate your attitude but here's as simply put as possible. 1) Women's IQ scores compared to men. The citations show that IQ tests try to norm out differences in IQ by making the tests less visuo-spatial ability and more verbal etc. This still yields a 2 to 1 point difference in IQ nevertheless. When Milo input the 2 to 1 point difference in Excel, it was very extreme the results how much more 14 points? Adult human males have a mean advantage in g of 7 IQ equivalent points, and g…
/r/TheRedPill08/01/18 05:40 AM
1

You want the D?
/r/askTRP08/01/18 02:22 AM
1

Dont LTR her, it may seem like you're having fun but then it becomes a habit. You are who you spend time with.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/18 02:06 AM
3

Spending without productivity equals deficits. You need to think more holistically.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/18 01:42 AM
1

Yeah, you're the kind of guy who really likes these false dilemmas don't you. His feelings of inferiority run so deep he cannot tolerate the classification of some things as successful (,i.e. superior) and other things as failed (i.e. inferior). You are basing your argument in a emoto-moral assumption that women can pick up for a man. That a woman is just as capable as a man where there is no evidence to show for it. In fact, The Theory of the Leisure Class (1899) where Vorblen argued that there…
/r/TheRedPill08/01/18 01:40 AM
1

Read my reply, there is nothing to envy. There is a statement of fact. No mental masturbation except on your end but communication is a two way street.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/18 01:27 AM
0

There are hiring biases as well such as the 2:1 STEM biases. College presidents and deans must be strong enough to put their foot down and suspend a faculty search if the pool does not include qualified minority candidates, said Hubie Jones, dean emeritus of BU’s School of Social Work. In the early ’80s, Jones caused an uproar by suspending the hiring of white professors in his school until administrators tapped more minority faculty, even when it meant turning away national stars. At one point,…
/r/TheRedPill08/01/18 01:16 AM
-2

How are the deficits going for them? Is that going to last? Not really. Financial problems are rife. Even if not if a better model is more productive... So fucking what!
/r/TheRedPill08/01/18 01:10 AM
-1

Maybe read the article another time when you're less emotional. I said they produce less than a man as qualified because of the wage gap's conclusions. Which is obvious. Which is not to say they do nothing which would mean that they are useless. I can't really get where you got this from. In a fiercely competitive academic program, I know of more women more qualified than you. Firstly, do you fucking know me? Secondly, there are quotas and 2:1 STEM biases for women in academia. www.boston.com%2F…
/r/TheRedPill08/01/18 01:08 AM
0

Life is not JUST reproduction, as humanity moves through life humanity faces problems that it has to account for. If reproduction was all that was needed why not stay as single-celled organisms. There was a need for progression beyond that goal. The environment made demands of survival, that causes energy requirements too vast for asexual reproduction and thus anisogamy was born. The average man is that strong and others are stronger. Obviously then even stronger men reproduce. Lastly, women bri…
/r/TheRedPill08/01/18 12:35 AM
0

It's not about socialism but about control. We meritoriously salivate about liberty so much we forget people want to be controlled. Capitalism is safer because it brings about power pluralism. Socialism centralizes power even among council's there is more likely a similarity in interests of the council that go unchallenged and result in abuse of power. With Capitalism, the interests are balanced between Economic, political, and Military elites who must meet compromise because they need each othe…
/r/TheRedPill07/01/18 07:39 PM
0

It's subtle but it can be done from a strong frame. If a woman pushes you, you give her the last word as Sean Connery said and she still ... Then hit the bitch. Anger can be warranted though it's hard to not be a weak frame it is relative.
/r/askTRP03/01/18 03:44 PM
3

The Wisdom of Psychopaths states they are highly successful SAS and SEALs you can't be a "mess" and succeed in the special forces. 20% of Fortune 500 CEOs are psychopathic but they are 0.1% of the population via pure neurological disposition. http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-AABNDty48pk/U29nSl8KhfI/AAAAAAAAE48/U5KwcIMKb48/s1600/personality_fig.png Dark Triads win at life outcomes https://www.boston.com/jobs/jobs-news/2015/11/03/study-links-narcissism-and-psychopathy-to-career-success The jerk is a psyc…
/r/TheRedPill28/12/17 02:45 AM
2

Not all psychopaths are a "fucking mess" Are that many CEOS in fortune 500 messes? No. The psychopath is colder and more put together, others are messes in comparison.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/17 02:33 AM
1

Most realms of life require more than what a beta would think is merit.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/17 01:19 AM
1

You are wrong. There being one doesn't suck. They are more successful. http://www.iflscience.com/brain/having-dark-personality-will-help-your-career-unless-youre-just-psychopath/ https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.boston.com/jobs/jobs-news/2015/11/03/study-links-narcissism-and-psychopathy-to-career-success/amp Science demonstrates the truths of “game” As with alchemy, science follows the amateurs in the field. This is a tiny sample of the vast body of research validating many of the precepts of ga…
/r/TheRedPill28/12/17 01:18 AM
1

Never get into a serious relationship in your 20s, rather just experiment and get used to all the random vagaries of social interaction. Make it a subroutine. An afterthought.
/r/askTRP28/12/17 12:50 AM
2

In the academic world ... In the business world ... Yeah right. Psychopaths make up 1 in 5 of Fortune 500 CEOs, many among them are Al Dunlap, Donald Trump, Alcibiades etc. They are so common in the financial sector, there's no morality there. It's an unfounded concept to them. They make up 0.1% of the world population. While Sociopaths make up 1-3%, being the kind that is hot headed and was abused. Feynman had psychopathic traits and was fine academically. Narcissists are the greatest leaders i…
/r/TheRedPill28/12/17 12:30 AM
-1

Damn, but crazy women. Would bang and forget.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 12:17 AM
1

1) They are intelligent. It means they sought intellectual equals (or superiors), they scare men away and have kind of a low SMV for it. You can be as excited as you like initially but ... 2) They are very insecure and need security. Thus they play in a small pond. 3) They are inverted narcissists and care for the cerebral. Ties in with #1 or for cruel and masterful men. 4) They came from very poor countries and are impressed by a little wealth and/or other little things. Naive. 5) Pressured 6) …
/r/askTRP18/12/17 08:57 AM
2

Usually both but always the latter.
/r/TheRedPill22/11/17 11:59 PM
1

I thought it was 70%, 90+ is hard to believe.
/r/TheRedPill06/11/17 12:48 AM
4

One trick: 1 see her for who she truly is. Most are the most basic bitches you'll ever meet. Just get to know her. I'd say only 13% of the time does the oneitis stay.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/17 10:29 PM
1

So you don't believe in alpha widow. I know women heal completely from relationships unlike men. I saw a study. Somewhere... But say, she's dated Brad Pitt can she date the hot dog stand guy she did before? Is what I think alpha widow is. Unless we are talking the effects of CC. Then her greater more, naive love is found closer to the source.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/17 10:23 PM
2

Teach your woman how to fight. I taught my ex how to. She became really tough but it made her more hypergamous after we broke up. Cause she won't be with a man she could beat and she was very good.
/r/askTRP26/10/17 09:55 PM
2

I mean they give up on marriage.
/r/TheRedPill26/10/17 01:24 PM
1

Possible LTR material
/r/TheRedPill26/10/17 01:22 PM
1

Well, I cited my studies. Tzeentch is meant to indicate I'm master of Machiavellianism and the intrasexual war with women. I think I can.
/r/TheRedPill26/10/17 02:59 AM
0

You can teach them, if you're the one to sexually awaken her and take her virginity (ies). Anal, Blow etc. Teach her. Many girls are insecure about it make her confident in it.
/r/TheRedPill26/10/17 02:57 AM
1

Show them unknown misandry blogspot and science vs feminism.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 11:30 PM
1

Maybe Chauvinism or sexism is good but not hatred of women. It signals low SMV to women. Women love sexist men: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11199-009-9665-x Either way, the guys who like women end up as benevolent sexists, looking out for women, caring about them, and wanting to see them happy, while the guys who’re bitter toward women just want to show them up or get even with them.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/17 11:22 PM
7

No. She has very little left. You could LTR till it's gone but it's better for you to let her cash out a long term luck. Many women who are smart enough to know the trade off very early like 19 or 20 still may choose uni-dimensional focus on career and what is called carousel riding, it's a shame when they regret it later anyways.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/17 10:36 PM
2

https://youtu.be/mLLFftiom4U
/r/TheRedPill25/10/17 05:31 PM
0

Yeah, look at Beckett and Castle, Castle was a lesser alpha when they met cocky and rebellious but after a few episodes he's completely dominated even as a writer in Scrabble! She married him over Davidson who might have been unattainable to lock down but she dreams about him in her sleep.
/r/TheRedPill23/10/17 01:32 PM
2

All this begs a better question should you tell women to step up and how much?
/r/TheRedPill23/10/17 01:27 PM
138

Yep. You think the other guy who's raw-dogging that girl you want and calling her his dirty little slut and making her suck his johnston dry waited for her to approach? He walked up to her somewhere, said hello, flirted with her a bit, and asked her out. That's why he gets to fill up her major bodily orifices with his hairy man meat and you do not. There are thousands of girls in your city you could be doing that with right now. Probably tens of thousands. Possibly hundreds of thousands, if you'…
/r/TheRedPill22/10/17 02:17 AM
3

Don't date party girls or wild girls unless I want something casual. This includes "reformed" party girls... you know, the ones who've "been there, done that" and have seen the light and realized how immature it all is (read: they've reached an age where they don't get the same level or quality of male attention they used to, and have realized it's time to lock a guy down before it's too late). There's actually some solid scientific research that finds that the higher a woman's partner count, th…
/r/askTRP20/10/17 02:48 AM
2

PSALM is basically a pneunomic that describes what women are attracted to — * power * personality (charisma, humor~ wit, social calibration, mental presence, charm, edginess etc.) * status (genetic dominance hierarchy) * athleticism (FFMI genes) * talent (IQ, singing ability) * looks Environmental * Status (also innate as genetic factors determine your placement but fame, prestige, connections, life set up) * money/resource acquisition/ lifestyle It's parable of talents maximize your talents, if…
/r/TheRedPill20/10/17 02:31 AM
1

So guys by smart do you mean like tenacious and stays at things long enough to get good or insanely high general mental ability with depth and versatility as in are you all sapiosexuals or ball breakers who enjoy those same traits in women? Cause it's rare to find a really hot/really smart girl in doing this you limit yourself since you are trying things. If Feynman could deal with dumb blonde models as a Physics Nobel Prize winner so can you. Anyways places to look: Ècole Polytechnique ENS East…
/r/TheRedPill20/10/17 02:15 AM
1

In other words, she ain't shit. Lol
/r/TheRedPill19/10/17 07:33 AM
1

Id say it's subjective but also would say that for most men, the experience and variety is excellent. Besides, the perils of oneitis are rife.
/r/askTRP19/10/17 02:29 AM
0

You're behavior is very beta. James Bond would spare me the epithets.
/r/askTRP18/10/17 11:40 PM
0

This isn't Sabrina Pasterski, I was just curious what you guys thought. I DON'T have oneitis. Secondly GTFO.
/r/askTRP18/10/17 02:49 PM
-2

Melania Trump, the founder of Y combinators wife she practically handles the Machiavellian side of the business cause he hates it.
/r/askTRP18/10/17 03:07 AM
0

It's not Sabrina Pasterski, this chick is Eastern European. Besides it's hard to tell how smart she is with the underlying social narrative agenda. She is an investment banker. But she thought of LQG (Loop Quantum Gravity)
/r/askTRP18/10/17 03:05 AM
13

Damn, I wonder what goes through the head of a guy so frugal, I respect it and all but seriously. Did he do it just to test her? Did he have his friends do that? Did she look for anything he splurges on? Maybe he had a great gaming setup but she devalued it?
/r/TheRedPill18/10/17 02:52 AM
1

I think Peterson either tries to not go too far when he drops his truths or fails to connect some dots. He says that the ONLY reason women usually don't occupy positions of power is because of work schedule, yeah how about personality, mean clustering, societal bound objectivity. He knows women are hypergamous but leaves it off with a shallow conclusion. Failing to connect female nature from the symbological folklore we know he has assembled. "His analysis is often subject to a Blue Pill conditi…
/r/askTRP18/10/17 02:34 AM
1

Like if she still has a dick etc.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/17 02:17 AM
-2

Why isn't she?
/r/askTRP18/10/17 02:16 AM
-3

Are you saying no women like her?
/r/askTRP18/10/17 02:16 AM
1

Chase Frame: eg. " Do you have a girlfriend? You say want an audition. Act like you could grab her ass at any moment but don't really. Be very rough, gregarious etc. Compliment her on how open minded and adventurous she is. Talk about weddings and sexual morality and you will get sex after ten dates. If she's firm about not hooking up go through the hoops if you really want her.
/r/askTRP18/10/17 01:11 AM
2

It's a woman.
/r/askTRP18/10/17 01:08 AM
2

Entertain, what do you have to lose if your mentally string and keep it compartmentalized. Like take her to a motel, not your house etc.
/r/askTRP18/10/17 01:07 AM
1

They see it as hooking up too.
/r/askTRP18/10/17 01:05 AM
2

"I've been in and out of things"
/r/askTRP18/10/17 01:04 AM
1

research is titled "Low-Status Compensation: A Theory for Understanding the Role of Status in Cultures of Honor." Here's the abstract: “The mechanisms that link herding regions to cultures of honor have never been empirically tested. The objective of the present article is to show the important role that issues of status play in linking herding regions to cultures of honor using the theory of low-status compensation (P. J. Henry, 2008b) as a framework. Four studies are presented. Study 1 replica…
/r/askTRP18/10/17 01:03 AM
1

Fuck No. Don't apologise to anybody. If you ap to the bystander, she might gossip to the perpertrator and form something. Just brush it off. You did what you did.
/r/askTRP18/10/17 01:02 AM
1

Don't be prickly, too rough but be firm.
/r/askTRP18/10/17 12:40 AM
1

Unicorns generally do not exist as people like Chris Langan. AWALT is a useful approximation. Not an absolute.
/r/askTRP17/10/17 09:15 PM
1

Oh. I meant it's good to know what you want in case you find it. But until then, I'll have fun taking plates, FB, Casual and ONS. I'm not that guy.
/r/TheRedPill17/10/17 08:53 PM
1

Series Sherlock from Elementary: he has a get shit done mentality. Love his brains, brawn and masculinity. Don Draper Nucky Thompson Elijah Mikealson Movie Mickey from the mob movie with Sean Penn. Wolverine Tony Stark
/r/askTRP17/10/17 04:10 AM
-1

She said she's never had a bf, in other words a Virgin.
/r/askTRP17/10/17 03:51 AM
1

Types of charisma Brooding (quiet) Smooth (a bit taciturn) Talkative (Downey Jr)
/r/askTRP17/10/17 03:44 AM
1

1 get fit 2 get T up 3 social calibration (become good at sending boundaries, unflappability, passing shit tests, power tests) 4 being mentally and physically present
/r/askTRP17/10/17 03:42 AM
1

Your young she wants to feel like she's still got it. She's mildly attracted to you but you don't inspires her to be that submissive even though it's her trend.
/r/askTRP17/10/17 03:33 AM
1

Do it, you owe it to the kid to give him/her superior genes.
/r/askTRP17/10/17 03:31 AM
1

Plate her or take her out for a fuck.
/r/askTRP17/10/17 03:28 AM
1

He's a greater beta, he's agressive, but he's too slimy and unaesthetic/charismatic to be alpha.
/r/askTRP17/10/17 03:27 AM
1

Find a person to indulge with outside of your circle.
/r/askTRP17/10/17 03:24 AM
1

Try a psuedo-aggressive escalation with her. See if she declines. Be very aggressive ly sexual the way Daniel Craig would. If it doesn't happen. Ghost/next her.
/r/askTRP17/10/17 03:23 AM
1

How do you know she's a roastie.
/r/askTRP17/10/17 02:49 AM
1

What do you find meaningfully engaging that you see fulfilling you greatly as you progress to different stages of it.
/r/askTRP17/10/17 02:47 AM
1

Yeah, lots of cute chicks come out at night... To class. During the day, due to their high Social market value their busy doing other things then they schedule school to night time. Plus in my college, many girls loved to fuck in the dark. Naughty.
/r/askTRP17/10/17 02:31 AM
1

You need to differentiate yourself. Ghost her for a while. But be prepared to maybe lose her. That's life but don't compete for chicks. It's 21st Century.
/r/askTRP17/10/17 02:29 AM
1

DO NOT block her, that's pathetic. Act casual and behave like the two of you are back to casual acquiantance don't try to be cocky friendly like you don't care though just return to base 0 in intimacy. Be. Casual.
/r/askTRP17/10/17 02:24 AM
1

Yes, start with his basics (The book) and search for the necessary articles as and when you need them unless you have a great memory. Can get free maybe. Start with fundamentals, basic technique et cetera. His stuff is not mechanical and will actually make you Hank Moody.
/r/askTRP17/10/17 02:21 AM
1

She hasn't done it before so initiate with Polaroids or some shit.
/r/askTRP17/10/17 02:12 AM
2

Yes, but in a non chalant smirking or patronizing way.
/r/askTRP17/10/17 02:10 AM
1

Will that help me get over my Virgin complex.
/r/askTRP17/10/17 01:49 AM
2

Looks wise or ?
/r/askTRP17/10/17 01:48 AM
1

The book of experience and having an eclectic group of friends. Social skills are highly calibrative and contextual. Remember push for results instead of reactions. Otherwise you get nowhere.
/r/askTRP17/10/17 01:29 AM
1

Yeah, there's this so-called unicorn at one of the Universities I'm at. She says same, never had a boyfriend, never smoked etc. But I have my suspicion s. I think I should next her. No hymen. No diamond.
/r/TheRedPill17/10/17 12:59 AM
3

She looks inbred. Dude has no game.
/r/TheRedPill17/10/17 12:43 AM
1

Yes, that's nature it adapts. You avoid marriage like the plague, you avoid rape allegations by fleeing to find foreign women etc. Of course women would become desperate to find new ways to extract what they NEED from you. They can only be "self righteous" enough to having to play the NAWALT oasis game, reading it when there's a systematic supply of men to ply resources from. When the well dries up, she figures out what a NAWALT is and seeks to mimick it. She may stay off social media so her CC …
/r/TheRedPill09/10/17 02:22 AM
2

If you can't muster it by yourself, seek therapy or most importantly hypnotherapy. The psychotherapeutic effectiveness is often understated.
/r/TheRedPill09/10/17 02:12 AM
1

No. I think one can still be rich and powerful and get bitter that his wife isn't a virgin, that he lost that girl a few years back and he uses his power to revenge against the abuse his former self endured.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/17 09:24 PM
3

I disagree completely, sure few people altruistically care but if you up your SexualMV and SocialMV, you can engineer enough dependence and value that people do care. Familiarity and history does a good job of this too.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/17 09:22 PM
1

I meant his mindset in relation to women, does Hank get oneitis, become bitter over any woman's actions other than Karen. He enjoys their company genuinely but he's in love in general not specifically.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/17 08:54 PM
4

So in short, approach women and relationships the way Hank Moody approaches anyone who isn't [what's her name]. With complete outcome Independence, you enjoy it while it lasts and when it fails [shrug] and move on with the same whimsical Glee.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/17 07:51 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter