TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Tzer-O Archive

View 0 posts and 27 comments by Tzer-O on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

In regards to students, the graph shows 41% female students, 21% male students.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 03:06 PM
0

No thanks, sorry.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 01:54 AM
1

If you can't find a citation for either then why is it a safe bet to assume it is referring to just US schools?
/r/MensRights03/06/14 12:16 AM
8

I'm going to need some kind of citation for that assumption.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 07:31 PM
1

Well the guy with the sign never specified that he was referring to just US schools.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 05:49 PM
4

http://davinasquirrel.wordpress.com/2012/04/13/school-shootings/
/r/MensRights02/06/14 04:58 PM
-8

Hopefully you're not calling survivors of sexual assault delusional.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 02:21 AM
1

You can't decide for someone else what success looks like. But isn't that what commercial media does when it perpetuates and normalizes stereotypical representations of gender that ultimately limit the ways a person is able to live and express themselves?
/r/MensRights28/05/14 02:07 PM
0

I knit. I bake things. I am interested in gardening. I am cisgender male but I am not limited by the hegemonic social expectations of my gender. I can do whatever I want and however I want to just as long as I don't hurt myself or anyone. I confuse the hell out of people, that's about it.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 04:53 AM
3

Sex is not a physical need, Thank you. The influence of commercialized masculinity makes it seem like it is, but it is not. Far too many people value themselves based on whether or not they are having sex, and how much sex they are having.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 04:13 AM
-1

Nothing I say will change your mind. It took me a full semester's worth of studies, readings and lectures to get to where I am. You believe what you want to believe, I'll believe what I want to believe. You're not actively interested in changing the way you view things so to try to teach you would be a waste of time. If you sincerely believe sexual and romantic relationships are part of being a happy person, you risk becoming an angry, upset person if you do not experience sexual or romantic rel…
/r/MensRights28/05/14 04:00 AM
-2

Is it possible that sentience just means we're a lot more clever at fulfilling our animal desires? Yes it is possible. Just like it is possible we are not entirely controlled by the same things that control our animal kingdom relatives. Who cares about insulting? Because you can be plenty civil and disagree with someone without insulting them. If you insult a person it really implies that you don't care about what they are saying or their feelings. what evidence do you have that it will be easy …
/r/MensRights28/05/14 01:15 AM
-1

I only figured out I was asexual 6 months ago. I'm 26 and I haven't had sex. I lived my teenage and college years believing whole-heartedly that I was what you refer to as an involuntarily celibate male. So in terms of experiences, I was involuntarily celibate far longer than I've been asexual. So at the moment it does encompass it so please do not discredit the years of depression, anger, and suicidal thoughts I used to have when I thought I was involuntarily celibate. Ah looks like I hit the d…
/r/MensRights28/05/14 01:02 AM
-2

Reproduction is a basic motivational force. Humans are not basic animals. The very fact we have sentience means we are not entirely controlled by the same things that control our animal kingdom relatives. To imply that we are controlled by our animalistic urge to reproduce limits humanity. Please don't imply that I am detached from reality because that is insulting. I think very differently from you but that doesn't mean I am detached from reality.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 12:51 AM
-6

Um, no sorry you can't invalidate me so please do not use that kind of micro-aggression. I only recently figured out I was asexual as of 6 months ago. I did so after years of assuming I was heterosexual because as a male that was what I was "supposed" to be. So I know all about sexual frustration and the inability to "get some". I know all about depending on sex to validate my character. I know all about asking "why don't I have a girlfriend" and questioned what I was doing wrong to the point of…
/r/MensRights28/05/14 12:38 AM
2

Well I'm asexual so I've been having a great time with it actually. You can be plenty sociable with people of all genders without needing to sleep with them. Don't imply that living single is abnormal. Plenty of single people are perfectly happy the way they are.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 12:23 AM
3

Technically true. But insults are a form of harassment and I don't understand why you need to use them.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 12:20 AM
-6

This might help explain many interrelated things.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 12:17 AM
2

I'm not even talking about that. I'm talking about your reply to the other person. You disagreed with them and insulted them. Just like you're insulting me for raising a point. What hope do you have of increasing communication on this sub if you are insulting people so freely? A lot of people do not speak up for fear of insults and harassment. There is no reason to insult a person because you disagree with them.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 12:12 AM
-10

Because I think a lot of MRA still do not acknowledge non-binary genders or gender fluid identities.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 12:01 AM
2

How about no one depends on sex or a relationship for them to be happy?
/r/MensRights28/05/14 12:01 AM
4

Perhaps not insulting people you disagree with is a good place to start. You can disagree with someone without insulting them.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 11:59 PM
-10

I don't think privilege prevents the expression of emotions.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 11:49 PM
2

A different way to look at masculinity. NSFW Language
/r/MensRights27/05/14 11:39 PM
12

Indeed. The victims are as such because his original plan failed. His initial goal was to kill as many women as possible, ergo, his initial goal was rooted in misogyny. Not saying anything about MRA or PUA or any of those communities. Just saying that his plan of action was rooted in misogyny.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 03:19 PM
4

It'd be easier to just explain what you actually mean instead of relying on the reader's ability to decipher what you are implying. That aside, the quotation's author has valid reasons to have a mistrust of men. The use of the word mistrust in this case is most likely meant to imply a lack of confidence. That does not mean the author assumes all men to be horrible, sexist monsters but rather the author has chosen to not automatically assume men to be of good character. However this does not mean…
/r/MensRights19/12/13 07:54 AM
5

You emphasize your desire to end generalized statements about men yet you make a generalized statement that you feel discriminated by all "feminists". All feminists do not act or think exactly the same nor do they all believe in the exact same goals or use the exact same methods to reach their goals.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 06:45 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter