| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Circumcision shouldn’t be allowed for consenting adults either.Good that we can at least agree on something, albeit partially (ie. that fetishism is a factor in circumcision grief / intactivism). About envious uncircumcised men, there are such individuals amongst your ranks that's for sure. A few even impersonated unhappily circumcised men and were exposed, go to the sub I post on (r/debunkingintactivism) and look on the right bar, you will find them. Why this happens is pretty self explanatory, namely insecurity. Yes, I know you guys don't agree, but women… | /r/MensRights | 28/01/21 09:06 AM |
| 0 | Circumcision shouldn’t be allowed for consenting adults either.It's funny you are accusing me of making wild assumptions while you are making the assumption yourself by thinking I base mine on nothing. First of all, click here, look at which are the most related subreddits to the main circumcision hate subreddit (circumcisiongrief): https://subredditstats.com/subreddit-user-overlaps/circumcisiongrief The most related subreddit is this: r/foreskin - A place to post photos or videos of foreskin, and discuss the natural beauty of our uncut members. Doesn't thi… | /r/MensRights | 27/01/21 03:48 PM |
| 0 | Circumcision shouldn’t be allowed for consenting adults either.What a great point! Many intactivists (anti-circumcision people) complain that circumcision is irreversible, while it actually is not. Foreskin restoration is not that difficult and with consistent daily regimen it can restore a foreskin in about a year or two. Hell, some men have even been able to restore their foreskin manually without even using any tools! We are talking about skin here, not actual organs, it's not that hard. So, if circumcision is mutilation, then why is it possible to so ea… | /r/MensRights | 27/01/21 07:10 AM |
| 0 | Circumcision shouldn’t be allowed for consenting adults either."I have a foreskin that's easy to clean therefore every single person in the world has easily cleanable foreskin." Nice logic. If it was so easy to clean the why do uncircumcised men have 5x higher rates of Balanitis (infection due to bacterial growth): A cross-sectional study and a retrospective study were performed to determine the frequency of balanitis in a randomly selected group of dermatology patients. A total of 398 subjects were included in the cross-sectional study, 213 (53.5%) of whom… | /r/MensRights | 26/01/21 08:11 AM |
| 0 | Circumcision shouldn’t be allowed for consenting adults either.Exactly. Read trough the comments and you will notice many 'intact' men are supporting this idea. Is this because they care about the wellbeing of other men so much (which is a stupid, since hundreds of scientific papers have shown that circumcision rarely has adverse effects) or is it because they want everyone to be like them, since they feel threatened by men who have penises that look better, don't smell and are preferred by women? | /r/MensRights | 26/01/21 08:07 AM |
| 1 | I hate how people are able to laugh at and make jokes about male genital mutilation or support any form of male genital mutilation and emasculation, and no one makes a big deal about it!Yes, I agree, that's probably the more ethical way to go. However based on the stats above, there's a smaller chance a man would be unhappy if they were circumcised (in the US at least). | /r/MensRights | 17/01/21 03:38 AM |
| 1 | I hate how people are able to laugh at and make jokes about male genital mutilation or support any form of male genital mutilation and emasculation, and no one makes a big deal about it!I am neutral on this subject, however based on my extensive research I don't think it's something that is wrong or causes harm. Yes some people are unhappy about it (10% in one US survey), but there's also many that are unhappy about being uncircumcised (29% iin same survey): http://cdn.yougov.com/cumulus_uploads/document/ugf8jh0ufk/toplines_OPI_circumcision_20150202.pdf Foreskin problems are much more common than people think, leading to such a high % of unhappy men. Circumcision would obviousl… | /r/MensRights | 17/01/21 03:24 AM |
| 1 | I hate how people are able to laugh at and make jokes about male genital mutilation or support any form of male genital mutilation and emasculation, and no one makes a big deal about it!Just because something is natural doesn't mean it can't cause problems. Also, certain % of men have a very short foreskin that does not cover the glans naturally (mostly asians), so not all of them look like that. I made a post about this here: https://www.reddit.com/r/DebunkingIntactivism/comments/kyubnh/if_the_foreskin_was_as_important_as_intactivists/ | /r/MensRights | 17/01/21 03:08 AM |
| 1 | I hate how people are able to laugh at and make jokes about male genital mutilation or support any form of male genital mutilation and emasculation, and no one makes a big deal about it!He's not wrong. Being uncircumcised can lead to a lot of health / hygiene issues and there's plenty of science to support that. | /r/MensRights | 17/01/21 02:33 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter