TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

UMDAdminMakesMeSad Archive

View 0 posts and 86 comments by UMDAdminMakesMeSad on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Thank you and I don’t think we should, which is why I favor a more liberal understanding of power, especially when it comes to sexual ethics, if only because of harm reduction and wellbeing. That said, I think the centurions argument has merit and there is something fascinating about the more realist interpretations of power mechanics. I think the centurions argument is logically coherent, but you simply have to eat a few nasty, brutal ethical conclusions in order to hold his view (which of cour…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 04:54 AM
2

Well, it depends on your fundamental conceptualization of power itself. Where you locate power, how you think it operates and its relation to agency, etc… There are ways to rationalizes this while maintaining the position that being penetrated is inherently submissive. For instance, according to a sort of Aristotelian ethics, one could be a victim without subordination. That said, this isn't something I've studied in any real depth, so I lack confidence in taking a position, in either direction.…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 02:51 AM
2

Whether it's inherently dominant or submissive depends on how you conceive of the nature of power itself. The reason no one is able to provide a satisfactory answer is because it's a complex philosophical topic, strangely enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 11:55 PM
2

From OP: As a woman, this is such an odd way of looking at sex and I am curious where it is coming from. I never saw the act of penetration as submissive, degrading or in any way bad, which is why I am wondering how many men (and even women) arrive at this perspective/what are the reasonings behind it? Historically, civilizations which value strength and honor to an extreme degree all seem to end up with this view about penetration and sex broadly, for whatever reason. If you are really curious,…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 11:26 PM
0

Do you have any proof for this claim?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 02:21 AM
1

Historically, young men being force-fed too much bitterness leads to instability and worse, atrocities (either domestically or abroad).
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 11:52 PM
1

I am not saying I disagree or agree with you, but I’d still like to point out, your approach to the issue is what triggers a lot of the intense bitterness, rage and hatred for society in young men. I think people in society should have an awareness of how this line of reasoning cause young, prime working age men to feel intentionally sacrificed at the altar in service of women, children, and the elderly.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 10:19 PM
9

You’re wasting your time. You bought into a myth about women’s desire for equality that was never really accurate. Generally, you’ll be able to see this by watching how someone's guiding principal shifts depending on the context of the moral judgement, revealing equality was never truly a first order principle or as absolute as you’d imagine. Instead of equality holding primacy, it is seen as an instrument for higher order concerns like the “collective good”, “social wellbeing “ or “women’s libe…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 09:11 PM
1

There’s actual data on this, even for people who grow up in diverse area the pattern holds in the end. You are objectively wrong about the dating choice of white women. In any case, it doesn’t matter as I view this as a non-issue as dating in of itself is discriminatory and often irrationally so.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 04:26 AM
2

I completely agree. A lot of these red pills guys don't understand that much of their ideology is founded upon Ressentiment - Wikipedia regardless of however they want to dress it up
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/25 10:43 AM
0

You're not getting it and you're missing the point. The guy is pretty explicitly saying to abandon what you want as to be able to better adjust to the current reality. He says this in another comment, if you don't want to read between the lines in the post: I wrote this for guys who are still stuck in the traditional mentality and struggling in a new world. I can't link you the comment directly because the automod will remove it, but if you look around, you'll find it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/25 10:33 AM
2

This entire mindset he's pushing is a form of Ressentiment - Wikipedia
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/25 10:26 AM
1

Men today need to embrace the view of “She’s not yours, it’s just your turn.” You need to start viewing a woman as an independent person that you have no control over. If she breaks up with you, consider that your turn is over. If you find a girl hot, don’t overthink and plan a fantasy future in your head or have any idealization or expectations — shoot your shot. Either you get her for a bit or you never get her. You don’t need to be some self-sacrificing sad story hero. This is a clear neuteri…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/25 10:20 AM
1

Because inherent to monogamy is a sense of possessiveness and ownership, which I don't think there is anything wrong with - people love to talk around this fact. The entire attitude OP describes is a coping mechanism to deal with the fact that your future wife is not a virgin and that your pure exclusivity only exists within a limited view. It's quite funny, but also sad to watch. This whole concept of "she is not yours, it's just your turn" reminds me of Ressentiment - Wikipedia In this case, t…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/25 10:03 AM
1

A lot of the modern red pill shit has been repackaged and redefined. From what I can remember, this concept used to be an argument based on the premise of woman being incapable of true loyalty, which is obviously a nutty take, so it ended up being whitewashed to appeal to a broader base. Nowadays, it's just a mindset people are using to cope with the fact that they can't marry a virgin, under the idea of radical acceptance of "the way things are"
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/25 10:00 AM
8

Facts lmao. However, we should be careful to distinguish between a cucked mindset, and the cucked reality itself which is quite grim.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/25 09:58 AM
–

Put a “u/“ before a username and you’ll be able to reference the person directly
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 08:26 PM
–

Do you have any actual data?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 01:43 PM
–

What were the occupations of your parents
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 03:38 AM
2

I agree that if women want, they can and will find partnership but as for people being stuffy and prudish about histories, it really depends on what you mean by wild. There is pretty good data on this stuff and both men and women don’t actually like extensive sexual histories in their partner, so much so that your husband finding your history exciting is a rare attitude. Mind you, this is actually one of the easier things to assess in the dating space since it’s just surveys and basic info gathe…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 02:45 AM
3

Can you stop the unnecessary virtue signaling over a trivial semantic distinction; by given I simply mean without restraint from severe environmental factors, government, poverty, or otherwise. Also what are you even trying to argue here ? Obviously when presented women would select the better option, that’s the point - when not constrained to such a degree we are able to see how women generally define the “ better options “ Reread the question on the main post. OP is asking this question as if …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/23 07:23 PM
1

No he is saying when women are given relative freedom to exercise their preferences they tend to prefer equal and above
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/23 06:37 PM
2

No he is saying when women are given relative freedom to exercise their preferences they tend to prefer equal and above
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/23 06:37 PM
–

It depends on how you define misogyny, so before any discussion on this subject takes place that is what I recommend you do, otherwise it’s just a bunch angry people arguing with each other using vague terminology
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 01:37 AM
2

So why even respond to the post
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/23 11:50 PM
1

I thought the same, until I watched qoves studio - I’d say all those things are about equal, with social status having a slight edge
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/23 06:16 AM
1

Have you had pre marital sex ?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/23 06:14 AM
5

This a little childish bro, I’m pretty redpill, but as long as she doesn’t hate men then there is nothing wrong with her wanting to be independent, and not needing a man for financial support
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/23 06:12 AM
1

Most American men above the age of 25 don't trip over 3-5 - if this were a count of 15-20, an Aussie guy would definitely be off put by it Most men care about sexual history in some capacity , that is legit like the one thing that is constant in the vast majority of heterosexual males throughout the world I've really only seen that level of indifference in sweden when I went for a summer
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 10:19 PM
1

Lmao, I didn't deny a basic definition - I even worked within your own interpretation of the definition here: No, there are a lot of situations that I regret and disgusted with myself that I participated in them, so you are just assuming that isn't the case; but, even if I entertain this argument here, a "belief" that a women who has slept around is nasty, and not applying that to myself, isn't actually in contradiction to my own behavior, because I am not a woman - it is just unfairly applied, …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 10:17 PM
0

No, it is comparable, I am still open to dating women who have extensive sexual history, even if I find it off putting. You truly do not understand what it means to be a hypocrite, you are really struggling here.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 02:59 AM
1

"Or beliefs" I don't think you understand what a belief is either, but that is not even necessary to get into; and, what belief do I have to which my own behavior does not conform? The belief that you yourself are somehow still pure and good Please point to where I said that in my comments? You have beliefs about another person's behaviour that you are now not applying to your own behaviour. No, there are a lot of situations that I regret and disgusted with myself that I participated in them, so…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 02:55 AM
-1

No, that isn’t what hypocrisy means, you are bit slow in the head aren’t you From Oxford languages: Hypocrisy: the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform; pretense. I am not making any moral prescriptions regarding what women ought to do, the feeling is entirely amoral - it is by definition, not hypocritical; otherwise, according to your logic, a straight man finding other dicks disgusting but not his own is hypocritical lmao Is a sho…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/22 07:32 PM
1

Not misogyny, but okay...
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/22 04:24 PM
-3

The person I replied to made a statement regarding what he thought was a better experience, I shared an alternative perspective; I never made any prescriptions as to how women ought to behave, nor did I say I wouldn’t accept an extensive sexual history in a potential partner. I just said what is preferable to me - having feelings about something does not in of itself necessitate hypocrisy, go read a dictionary A poor women could prefer a rich man whilst being open to dating poor men, a short wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/22 09:45 AM
6

I was born in America, but lived in Australia with my grandmother before moving to the states for college, Australians might not care about chastity to the same extent, but men there still certainly care about sexual history, are you just making this up ? The only place I’ve traveled to where I’ve seen a significant portion of men just not care is probably Sweden, and that amount of social engineering to iron out sexual jealousy in boys from youth in insane. Edit: When I said past in my original…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/22 05:22 AM
3

For sure, though, the only reason why I even read it was because of a course I took at University - I think you'll have a hard time convincing others to read it if they are outside of an academic environment. It might be more productive to just write some paragraphs regarding the circumstances of women yourself, or maybe share the insights here directly? Or maybe both things won't lead anywhere, this isn't the most open minded sub reddit on the platform, to put it nicely.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/22 01:01 AM
17

I read the awakening by Kate Chopin, and I very much dislike Edna as a person, I find her disgusting ( ironically, given what the broader commentary the author was describing ) but I do have more sympathy for the circumstances women are often placed in after reading; and, I agree with the recommendation, people here should read it if you have the time. Very interesting work.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/22 12:46 AM
3

facts brother, well put.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/22 12:09 AM
9

America, Canada, Western Europe and some parts of South America and really the only places that men are as tolerant of their girlfriends having had a past. I really don't think people understand how insanely conservative the rest of the world is
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/22 12:05 AM
3

Yea idk bro, not to sound arrogant or whatever, but I've fucked a lot girls, I was in these streets for a long time, and I am surprised I got out of all of that with literally no STD's, not even herpes; anyway, I have to say, a girl who is a virgin can learn how to fuck really quickly. I think I gotta disagree with this : IME being with a woman who has enough sex experience to be confident and know what she wants is infinitely better than dealing with a virgin. Its really not much of difference …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/22 11:58 PM
1

If presented with the option, most men would prefer the girl have never fucked any other dudes, but part of growing up and maturing in dating is getting used to the idea that every girl has a past So, its not like a guy is actively wishing for it, its just that beyond the initial discussion about sexual history, the information is put to the back of the mind into a little cabinet, and its never thought about again. In modern times, women fuck and get around, if you are being realistic, if you ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/22 11:48 PM
1

Empirically, women are more empathic on average when observing data at the population level; and, there is significant evidence of it having some biological basis, along with cultural conditioning. I think this might lead to a greater disposition for open mindedness, but that is some what of a conjecture, not sure what the data is on that in particular. Also, you should be careful with this information in practice, it’s not necessarily the case that all women are more empathetic, nor is the corr…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 09:33 PM
1

I don't think having a preference against high notch count requires that they be misogynistic, though, calling women cum rags is slut shaming. To say it more clearly, having the preference itself is not slut shaming
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 04:27 PM
1

Buddy, while all these things might be true, the primary reason men are averse the high notch count women is just that they find it gross... Right or wrong, you'll often here men call women who have had a lot dick things like, " cum rag ", " public toilet ", etc..., and if you don't experience this sort of instinctual disgust, you just wouldn't understand how off putting it is Men find it gross in the same way you would probably find someone who is into skat gross, these issues of control and in…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/22 04:12 AM
12

A a prude is someone who is easily shocked by matters related to sex, I wouldn't call it prudish to be shocked or offput by particularly atypical or unconventional sexual interest/behavior. What you mean to say is, if my partner is not okay with the weird things I am into, I wouldn't want him in life, which is fine - but calling him prudish makes it seem like he is the atypical one, just at the other end of the spectrum.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 05:24 PM
2

Okay, so why would it be any different if you were active in being penetrated by someone else? I don't understand the question, different to what? The point of the distinction is to make clear who is getting fucked - who is doing the fucking - and who is in a neutral position. A guy allowing you to ride him, for example - is him placing himself in a neutral position where you are using him to fuck yourself, you aren't fucking him since you aren't penetrating him, in the same way you aren't using…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/22 09:44 PM
3

Why in penetration is the penetrator assumed to be the one with agency? If you ride a dildo is the dildo then the active force just because it's penetrating? Which is why I said both the anatomy and the active force is important. If you are riding a dildo, you'd be "fucking yourself" since you are the active force with agency, but are being penetrated by yourself. Running into a knife would be stabbing yourself lol. If nobody moved the knife nobody would say someone else stabbed you or the knife…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/22 09:22 PM
3

You being able to move away from the strap on isn't a greater or even equivalent control as being the one who is fucking; the active force here is very relevant, and so is the anatomy If one person is punched in the face by another, who would you say is doing the hitting? If one person leans into a punch by another person, who is doing the hitting? If you run into a knife, are you stabbing yourself? Are you stabbing the knife with your body? ( silly question, but its to make a point regarding pe…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/22 08:25 PM
2

You are the active force when you fuck someone in the ass, whether the process continues is largely dependent on whether or not you continue to do it; and, being able to withdraw consent isn't an exertion over the physical process, because at the end of the day, the active party has to acknowledge it, which means the power is still in the active party's hands. The person being pegged is getting fucked, not doing the fucking - they are passive in the interaction. Look, its obvious you are not goi…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/22 06:33 PM
2

Penetration: "the action or process of making a way through or into something." The active party is controlling/directing/influencing the sexual process with penetration, they are largely responsible for the proceedings of that particular interaction. Submission: " the action or fact of accepting or yielding to a superior force or to the will or authority of another person. " If you are consenting to be pegged, you are submitting to the will of the person who is pegging - domination might not be…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/22 06:20 PM
2

Yes, they are single mothers, it is the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/22 05:07 PM
3

Domination is quite literally: “ the exercise of control or influence over someone or something, or the state of being so controlled.” In pegging, you are certainly exercising control greater than what ever your partner is doing in return in that moment, in that particular dynamic - the same is true of penetration in most cases. You seem to really want to separate domination from this, why? Call the spade a spade - a man who is being pegged is being submitted, it’s fine not to be dominant always…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/22 04:43 PM
10

I imagine she finds men with submissive sexual proclivities off putting and a turn off.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/22 11:17 PM
2

It is really hilarious to watch this guy pretend to not understand the function of adjectives, which are all context dependent and relative. I guess in his day to day life, he must not say things like " fast ", " big ", " large", etc... Must be rough to not ever be able to describe or qualify things related to nouns
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 09:51 PM
1

I see this sort of logic on Reddit often, and it is slightly irritating. The word kink, is a sort of noun where its classification is dependent on the context and environment in which the word is used in; so, with this being the case, the definition of kink is, " the use of non-conventional sexual practices, concepts or fantasies". If the sexual practice you are engaging is non-conventional, and deviates enough from the norm of whatever society/environment you are in - it is a kink. You can figh…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 06:35 PM
2

Aww, you couldn't have let it slide lmao The drama on this post was probably the most heated its been a while, I was enjoying the mess, but I get it I guess
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 06:20 PM
8

I’m not sure you read my comment, and from the way you talk, I am guessing this reply is just going to lead to a conversation with you gaslighting lived experiences, so carry on
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 04:04 PM
13

I see, but yea, the humiliation is pretty strong , it makes you feel like a cuck doesn’t it lmao. What makes it even worse is - it is true, that all these men fucked your girl, the past happened; and, the only distinction from then and now is some progression of time and an agreement to restrain her sexual behaviors in the future ( monogamy ). Which is somewhat like buying into an illusion to give the feeling of your girl being sexually exclusive to you, when she wasn’t and isn’t, since other me…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 02:50 PM
2

You wrote the same comment twice bro
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 02:39 PM
2

Shit well, it might not be the coke then, and he was into drinking girl piss from the jump Me personally, I stick to weed so I wouldn’t know lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 02:17 PM
20

Yea I agree - people cite all these studies saying promiscuous women are more likely to cheat, can’t pair bond, etc... And, while some of those things might very well be true, and be of concern to some, I don’t think they really explain the primary reason(s) why men care in the first place. It’s usually because of some instinctual disgust ( like an ew gross, idk where her mouths been ) , or for concern of reputation, in like 99 percent of the cases I’ve seen IRL. Most guys have never even heard …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 01:56 PM
32

I am not saying this is right, it’s some pretty extreme objectification; but, the reason men lose respect for guys who wife up 304s, is because he is treating what was “community pussy” like some exclusive diamond. It makes him look like a bitch with no self respect and no standards, only able to wife up everyone’s leftovers because he can’t do any better - even if thats not the case, and he loves the women because she’s good to him. So, the solution here is for that man in question to not care …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 01:42 PM
1

I see you arguing with men specifically a lot on this sub, which is whatever, no judgement; but, I am just curious as to why you are so motivated?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 03:04 AM
9

Yea, I know a girl who experienced the complete opposite, which is kinda the problem with making generalizations with personal anecdotes; and also , while I am not too sure about the other variables you listed, from what little reputable polling data we have available, the vast majority of men care about sexual history in some capacity. So while many of the stated dating preferences we see here on this sub might not be representative of men at large, this one particular preference is pretty cons…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 02:37 AM
7

I think the core of this issue is - if a women was at all promiscuous at any point in their life, people will continue to assume that they are promiscuous, even if they have changed their ways; and, I think for women, it’s one of the hardest stigmas to shake off. So, let’s say someone engaged in casual sex before and found they had not liked it after a few guys, just the mere fact that they even tried is going to be enough for a lot of dudes to just consider them 304’s - permanently. I actually …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 08:03 PM
6

Dude, what are you even talking about? I am just describing some important things to note when interpreting the data. Do you think I would've linked a study disproving common claims that women are all whores if I was biased in the way you probably imagine I am?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 05:05 PM
1

You really want the last word lol, you are like a child - alright, go ahead and reply again, I will let you have it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 05:01 PM
1

Dude, you quite literally handwaved my response about promiscuity, and only responded to my questions about value, which was to demonstrate that you do not understand how language works lmao. I wasn't avoiding shit, but you can keep saying that if it makes you cope better. You then edited in a few questions in your response that I couldn't see since I hadn't reloaded the page when I was writing my "essay". I then saw your edit, and replied to it with an edit of my own. Now listen bro, if you wan…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 04:55 PM
2

Yea, over the course of a lifetime, men actually have more sexual partners, which is pretty interesting isn't it, its narrative breaking; but, be careful with how you interpret the data, because the age demographic you are looking at is very important when making these sorts of conclusions. What happen is, women are significant more promiscuous in their younger years, and I mean significantly more promiscuous, younger men aren't even close to scratching their numbers; but, as men start to get ol…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 04:48 PM
1

I did, and you also contributed to this tangent about value, but whatever. Edit: Fixed typo and grammar
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 04:39 PM
2

Value: the regard that something is held to deserve; the importance, worth, or usefulness of something. The "importance", "worth", and "usefulness" of something are subjective metrics; the definition is entirely subjective, and value itself, does not indicate a specific number. Specific numbers for the "value" of things are not intrinsic to the item itself, but are arrived at through collective opinion (usually) as to how valuable that thing might be, but even these units are variable depending …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 04:12 PM
5

A word that is nebulous is going to be ill-defined, until you take in the context of the situation and environment that are you using it in, this is the difference between static and dynamic concepts. For promiscuity, the utility gained is being able to describe sexual behavior that deviates largely from what is normal in that particular environment. Question for you, would you then say the word "value" is similarly useless? What about "money"? Mediums of exchange are variable, and could come in…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 03:53 PM
5

I said its beside the point because I didn't want to get caught up in the weeds, I thought it'd be safe to assume that anyone with a working brain would know that what qualifies as promiscuous would be a subjective judgement; and, this is a conversation about preferences and behavior categorizations, all of which are going to be described with words that are context dependent, so you saying its worthless is untrue if some utility is gained by the person who is using it. Your critique is dumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 03:43 PM
21

No, casual sex qualifies as promiscuity if the amount of people you sleep with are high in number, and this is regardless of how selective you are - I think the confusion here might be because the word has two definitions: having or characterized by many transient sexual relationships demonstrating or implying an undiscriminating or unselective approach; indiscriminate or casual. I think you are referring mostly to the second one, and might be somewhat conflating it with the first; now, each man…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 03:12 PM
1

Not sure, not familiar with preferences in gay culture
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 01:47 PM
13

The vast majority of men on this earth have some concern for sexual history - the men who do not care are very overrepresented on Reddit, and are only really present in similar numbers in unique pockets of particularly liberal cities. To make matters worse for you, outside of Western Europe, United States, and Canada, concern over sexual history is even more severe, to the point where in places like China, many men still might even demand chastity ( or near chastity ) for an LTR; and, these othe…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 05:16 AM
7

OP quite literally said they think insecurity is the root cause of men’s concern over n-count, which is what my comment was primarily responding to I was also pointing out that this settle/not settling discourse is stupid and meaningless, because these preferences are unlikely to change, so why even bother with the conversation
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 04:22 AM
1

Not related to your comment, but why would you ever allow yourself to be diagnosed with ASPD, that is social suicide if it is leaked; and, ASPD will likely remain one of the most stigmatized personality disorders, so no amount of activism will ever change this fact. I am not trying to come off mean here, that isn’t my intention - I am just genuinely amazed that you allowed yourself to be diagnosed, and curious as to what your reasoning is for seeing a psychologist/therapist. There are even repor…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 01:29 AM
6

Yes, have an upvote, I agree - I accept it completely, and other men should accept reality for what it is as well. Men have every right not to want to date promiscuous women, women have every right to not want to date short, fat, ugly men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 01:14 AM
55

I promise you, the aversion to women with high body counts is largely pre-rational, there isn’t much of a thought process, it is an instinctual disgust; and, all justifications and reasoning after the fact, even if they have merit, are post-hoc ( meaning they felt the disgust first, and justified it after ). So while it can be insecurity, in actuality, that’s very rarely the primary reason for why guys are off put by a women whose been around the block, they just find it gross. This sort of post…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 01:04 AM
11

Lol, most men know women will feel this way if they ask directly, so guys just end up playing the sexually liberal dude to get a guesstimate of what it is indirectly No men with dating experience are just gonna full send ask a girl her body count unless they think she’s the type of girl to blurt it out with confidence So this is all to say, OP should’ve already known how most women would feel about this, it’s obvious lol, this post is kinda redundant
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 12:35 AM
3

Let’s not encourage truck-kun to move his business operations to America
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/22 09:04 PM
3

I see
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/22 08:16 PM
3

When you say you’d have a kid on your own, you mean that you had planned to go to a sperm bank or something ?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/22 08:13 PM
1

This is gonna sound pretty fucked up, but I’m pretty sure when you get down to it, the most simple reason is because Bob doesn’t want Chads leftovers Men don’t want community pussy - It’s objectifying and what not, but that’s the thought process. A girl will never marry bob without first having her fun, taking a chance to see if Chad will make them their princess or whatever the fuck.... honestly, I don’t blame her, there is no resentment at all - who wouldn’t take the chance to be with their dr…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 08:18 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter