TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

UR_Smoothbrain Archive

View 0 posts and 133 comments by UR_Smoothbrain on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

First off, you’re not providing any data. Secondly, data deserves scrutiny when appropriate. Cope.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 06:20 PM
2

Putting the onus on me to carry your water isn’t really a great way to support the assertion. There are historic biases to crime reporting, both among group membership and types of criminality. If we were using crime statistics, we would also conclude that black men and minorities are more violent, which isn’t something I personally believe. I also think it’s a real stretch to suggest that there are statistics that accurately represent the behaviors or beliefs of men as some homogeneous group, a…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 06:15 PM
1

Do better.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 06:01 PM
2

What data? What statistics?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 05:58 PM
2

That’s your assessment. I do certainly think there are some moral judgments to be made about the things you’ve chosen to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 05:55 PM
2

I was trying to be fair to you and give you credit by specifically referencing your comment. I’m not sure how to respond to the continued argument. I hope you have a good day.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 05:54 PM
1

I think the other mods need to be reviewing how you use your mod privileges. You obviously lack self control.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 05:53 PM
3

Simply saying something doesn’t make it true.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 05:51 PM
6

Yes, a generalized response to ungeneralizable behavior, hence “bigot”. You get to choose who you are, do better.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 05:51 PM
2

I think there’s plenty to criticize men for. I could levy some criticisms myself. That doesn’t mean that I think your criticisms are always valid or fair. I also don’t perceive this particular comment as a criticism of women or women. You actually mention both, and primarily seem to argue against gross generalizations based on sex, which is a perspective I definitely respect. Trying to give you credit.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 05:46 PM
1

Oh look, the mod has continued to inappropriately used her mod privileges to mod away things that poke holes in her post, and don’t break sub rules. Sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 05:42 PM
1

I guess, although I have no idea how you’d substantiate a claim like that. It’s obviously what you believe, but it’s not necessarily based in any sort of fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 05:41 PM
6

It’s certainly not the “worst thing” a woman has done to a man. That doesn’t mean it’s not absolutely shitty bigoted behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 05:39 PM
13

Ok, wow, that’s quite a grounded response. Didn’t really expect that.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 05:38 PM
–

I like how you’re a mod, and because your argument doesn’t hold water, you mod away the responses specifically pointing that out. This is pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 05:33 PM
3

The fault in your logic is considering the mindsets you’re referencing “collective male behaviors”, hence my identifying these views and the corrosponding reactions as “prejudiced” and “bigoted”. Might as well throw out some comments about black folks while you’re at it. They are more violent, after all. /s This is logically no different aside from the fact that we’re talking about people with male genitalia rather than dark complexion. This is a very sad demonstration.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 05:32 PM
2

Relative qualifiers like “more” or “less” violent, are very different than absolute statements and generalizations posed by the insult in question.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 05:28 PM
–

I mean, I’m supposed to consider your view while you subscribe to amoral interpretations of bigoted behavior? Kind of a weird expectation, frankly. Like I said, this says a lot about who you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 05:26 PM
7

I’m not offended, I’m just calling a spade a spade. It’s shitty behavior, whichever way you slice it. If that’s what you want to spend your energy justifying, that’s your decision. It speaks to who you are (or choose to be).
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 05:22 PM
8

Really lowering that bar today, huh. You’re the one who has to justify your behavior to yourself. I’m very glad I don’t share your views that this is an acceptable and justifiably way to treat other people. Edit: The other mods really need to be reviewing the way this mod is using mod privileges. She is breaking sub rules and overtly abusing mod features to do so. I’ve been banned for 3 days, FYI. Please review comments. Edit2: There were no such insults. Mod is overtly lying. Please have commen…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 05:20 PM
16

You don’t speak for women, you speak for yourself. There were many women who did not promote this insult hyperbolically, but literally. The whole “men are murdering rapists” crowd, which you help gas up by fueling them with this sort of trash. This is a failure of basic human decency. You should be ashamed of yourself. I would say the same thing to any man promoting derogatory views of women. In fact
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 05:17 PM
18

“They”? Well apparently we forgot to inform our elected spokesman about our collective response as men. My response was specifically not enjoying being generalized. In fact, this has been an extremely common response to recent generalizations about men for many years at this point. What I’m reading is justification for feeling like you’re entitled to behave like a bigot, because that’s what this is, bigotry. Edit: mod is abusing mod privileges. Comments and mod activity should be reviewed by ano…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 05:14 PM
16

So women ARE a monolith, AND you speak for them? Oh my. Fact of the matter is that a lot of people weren’t being hyperbolic. That you don’t understand that is the reason why you think men misinterpreted. It was a targeted insult rooted in overt sexual prejudice. The fact that it gained so much traction really helped change my views on many women in an extremely negative way, and certainly on the content they consume as a group. I find it extremely disturbing. Social media is as bad or worse than…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 05:08 PM
1

And you don’t have to be part of a protected class to cause trouble for society. A large number of romantically disadvantaged dudes with no opportunity for healthy outlets has pretty negative implications on social cohesion.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 04:48 AM
–

Which has nothing to do with anything you’re responding to.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 04:34 AM
–

Counterpoint: rape culture in India.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 04:15 AM
1

Oh, k. 👍
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 02:56 AM
1

K
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 02:49 AM
1

I think you certainly see what you need to see to justify whatever narrative you’re trying to spin. I also think you’re a 38 year old woman who works really hard to identify herself as “not a child” for some reason. I could certainly draw some inferences, but I’ll just stop there for now.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 02:40 AM
1

I was more honing in on you accusing some guy of wanting a “trauma bond” in the absence of him saying anything to indicate as such. That’s one of those pop-psych terms that circulates on social media. A lot of the other things you’ve said used subjective language, and like I qualified my original response, I’m not even sure we’re using the same terminology. But go ahead, angry lady. Be angry. “You’re not my real mom!”
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 10:36 PM
1

Doesn’t sound like it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 09:50 PM
1

I agree with everything you just said.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 09:48 PM
–

It’s not realistic to think that you’re going to be infatuated with someone your entire life, and there is a real disadvantage to applying that requirement to your romantic relationships. Love changes, it’s natural, and if that means that you lose a primary partner and support person in your life, then that’s a real practical disadvantage. It’s perfectly fine to make that choice for yourself of course. However, I think it should be made with the understanding of what life looks like for unpartne…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 09:11 PM
–

“Codependence” is not the same as “interdependence”. People hear “-dependence” without understanding what the prefix of the term actually means, and then just take some mental shortcut and conclude “dependence” is bad. The fact of the matter is that “interdependence” is a socially healthy behavior in a relationship, and the inability to depend on someone else is very much unhealthy. If you are only in a relationship for “like”, and avoid any sort of interdependence, you miss the things that faci…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 08:46 PM
7

That’s pathetic. Poster child for social-media-brain, I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 07:55 PM
1

Yep
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 05:05 PM
1

Except that it’s not? You guys have serious unaddressed mental health issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 05:04 PM
–

You, for creating this thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 05:01 PM
–

Do you do anything but spam this sub with dumb assertions all day? You need to get a life.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 05:01 PM
1

Troll
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/25 09:03 PM
1

Why are you here, if not to troll, if you are not a “leftist”? Troll
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/25 09:01 PM
1

Because it’s a troll, just report them so we can get them out of here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/25 08:46 PM
1

Troll
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/25 03:08 PM
1

I’m not sure identifying a troll is the same as bullying. I mean dude, you have an account for the apparent primary purpose of antagonizing this sub. Go troll somewhere else.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/25 04:54 PM
2

Most of your comments here are blanket denials of men’s issues, or arguments towards that end. In regard to the rest of your comment, as I said, you’re a troll. It’s pathetic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/25 04:33 PM
2

I’ve seen your post history. You seem to use this account primarily for the purpose of contrarian argument specifically in this sub. Additionally, you argue (poorly) in overtly bad faith. Expecting some good faith engagement in response to that is fairly unrealistic. You have negative karma dude. That’s not usually the product of substantive engagement. You’re a troll.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/25 04:25 PM
2

Because you make lazy implications that seem particularly poorly informed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/25 04:04 PM
3

Well, maybe you can drink Freon when there’s less potable water due to worldwide increasing drought conditions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/25 03:42 PM
4

The development of modern HVAC equipment, a technology that marginally insulates us from the environment outside our living structures, does not in any way mean that climate change is somehow less severe or less of a threat. This is an overtly stupid argument.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/25 03:26 PM
3

Deaths have plummeted in the last 100 years, despite rising Co2 output, and the fact that the phenomenon wasn’t generally known about prior to that timeframe? Durrr
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/25 02:59 PM
8

Well, you’re certainly on “something”.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/25 02:54 PM
14

Less vulnerable as an employee than an employer? Apparently you’re unfamiliar with the circumstances of like 90% of the working population. Another thoughtful reply by the resident genius. Great stuff. Compelling and rich.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/25 02:48 PM
10

I like that you criticize their analysis as shallow, and then wave away climate change as not being an existential threat (despite fairly wide scientific consensus that identify it as just that) because common respiratory illnesses currently kill more people, never mind that climate change has been linked to worsening health outcomes. Great deep dive, glad to know I don’t have to worry. Brilliant. Using all two brain cells today I see.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/25 02:47 PM
5

There’s that “only” qualifier turning things into absolute statements. You can disagree all you want with your own straw men. Seems like the primary basis for your viewpoint is that you don’t believe in egalitarianism. You can use that same logic to draw some interesting conclusions based on race as well. Maybe you already do that. 🤷‍♂️
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 06:54 PM
5

Sorry to break it to you, but your belief or nonbelief in egalitarianism has no bearing on the fact that your stated argument doesn’t address the content of the original post.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 06:45 PM
8

I’ve answered your question. It’s not my fault that you can’t formulate a coherent response without putting words in my mouth.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 06:37 PM
5

Because it doesn’t address the content of the original post, which is about qualifying pension/retirement ages. This isn’t complicated.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 06:36 PM
6

“Solely”. So you need me to make an absolute statement while you put a bunch of words in my mouth? Pass. I’ll say it again for you. In terms of qualifying retirement ages, men are systemically disadvantaged in many countries. The various policies that facilitate those outcomes are discriminatory. I’d really suggest reading the original post.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 06:35 PM
5

That does not at all address the difference in qualifying pension ages depending on country, so I would suggest that’s a fairly bad argument. Again, I don’t think you’ve actually read the original post.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 06:26 PM
11

Then stop playing semantics and I’ll engage your substantive comment. Absent that, I’ll just point out that you’re playing word games. It’s not complicated. I don’t think you’ve actually read the original post.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 06:21 PM
6

Your argument is that men don’t want to retire?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 06:16 PM
12

I am engaging you, you just don’t like what I’ve said. The original post here references higher retirement ages for men. Can you not read? Edit: Every comment you make gets sneakily edited later. Is it that hard to stand by your own words?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 06:14 PM
8

In the case of policies that facilitate those outcomes, like the previously mentioned retirement age gap, yes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 06:13 PM
16

The policies that leads to those comparatively negative outcomes for men. Sure seems like you are.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 06:11 PM
21

It’s systemic discrimination. Play semantics if you want.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 06:09 PM
5

Spending is generally a choice. Retirement age as a function of rate of pay, or age of death, typically aren’t.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 06:07 PM
1

I love it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/25 09:40 PM
1

However many you need.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/25 09:17 PM
1

You should probably take your mood stabilizers.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/25 09:16 PM
1

Well that’s one way to be a lunatic!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/25 09:04 PM
1

You’ve made an indisputably excellent point. It’s amazing to me that people like this exist. Joking about the equality, but not about the amazement.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/25 09:04 PM
1

Attraction can change over time, especially if someone is a pain in the ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/25 09:02 PM
1

Dunno if you watched anything from CPAC, JD Vance in particular, but this casual man-hating and corrosponding male desperation is being weaponized against liberals/non-maga folks openly. I’m very curious how people feel about that, women in particular.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/25 08:56 PM
–

Can we just downvote this trash already?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/25 08:50 PM
3

Nobody’s. Your posts are extremely judgy and strangely puritanical in various ways. I’d call your viewpoints regressive, and mostly you just shit on dudes. One step up from a troll.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/25 04:12 AM
–

Nobody’s. Your posts are extremely judgy and strangely puritanical in various ways. I’d call your viewpoints regressive, and mostly you just shit on dudes. One step up from a troll.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/25 03:20 AM
1

I’m not even sure what you’re talking about at this point. I’m just reiterating the point that you’re a sexist.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 08:53 PM
1

No, I just like to argue, and you have a toxic personality with abundantly sexist viewpoints, so you’re easy to activate.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 08:50 PM
1

Oh, ok. Gonna go make fun of minorities later?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 08:48 PM
1

No, I don’t care about any of that. Mainly I just don’t like sexists, and you madam, are very sexist.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 08:47 PM
1

Oh, right, nothing to do with the fact that you’re a sexist who can’t respond to simple questions? Got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 08:45 PM
1

I think people should be treated with respect regardless of gender. In contrast, you take obvious glee in exclaiming that you don’t have to treat men with respect. That’s called sexism, which is why you’re a sexist. You should go make fun of handicapped kids, you’d probably enjoy it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 08:44 PM
1

I’m dismissing them because you had to google to find hyperlinks that don’t generally address the query. You’re ignorant and dismissive of men’s issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 08:40 PM
1

I’m describing your behavior. You haven’t proved me wrong, you’ve made my point for me. You don’t care about the well being of men, and it’s very apparent.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 08:38 PM
1

You’re prejudiced. You’re sexist. You’re a bigot. Sorry if that’s news to you. Be better.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 08:30 PM
1

I’m dismissing them because they are marketing initiatives, not men’s groups. You’ve listed one group (men’s sheds), that isn’t exactly widespread. This is loads? The moment has passed. You’re clearly happily ignorant. Carry on.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 08:29 PM
1

As I said, your bigoted sexual prejudice isn’t my problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 08:27 PM
1

You’re a few comments late with your hyperlinks. Most of these aren’t even groups, they are marketing initiatives. LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 08:22 PM
1

You sure are, actually. There’s that lack of self-awareness. Spectacular.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 08:17 PM
1

I no longer actually care, because you’ve proven my point. I asked for that about 5 comments ago. You made it pretty clear you didn’t know of any, despite claiming loads.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 08:14 PM
1

No, your unbridled sexism does.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 08:10 PM
1

As I said, you can’t name them. That’s one way to make a shitty argument. Way to demonstrate your intelligence.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 08:09 PM
1

Oh, ok. There’s that empathy and self awareness you’re so good at. Do you enjoy being a bigot?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 08:08 PM
1

But you can’t name them…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 08:07 PM
1

The lack of men’s groups and the lack of women’s support for the few that exist. You listed a bunch of random words (“men’s work group”) after claiming there were loads of them. Cool cool.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 08:06 PM
1

I thought you knew of a bunch of men’s groups that women support. You said there were “loads”.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 08:04 PM
1

Music band.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 08:01 PM
1

Tell me you can’t read without telling me you can’t read.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 08:01 PM
1

You can look at your comments yourself if you feel it’s important to answer that question for your betterment. I mean you certainly won’t, because self-awareness isn’t something you readily practice. You’re pretty close minded, and demonstrate a great deal of sexism, so I’m not going to pretend my words (or the words of men in general) would carry any weight with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 07:58 PM
1

“Music band”
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 07:52 PM
1

Those aren’t groups and more than “music band” is a real band. Have you promoted and donated to these groups? Got a phone number?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 07:51 PM
1

No, I actually enjoy disagreement. I view your behavior as indicative of contempt because you seem to intentionally disregard men’s issues, not just in response to me, but others as well. You then gleefully exclaim that you don’t have to treat men with respect. Ok, cool. I’m supposed to think you’re an empathetic and relatable person in the presence of that behavior? You’re quite unaware of yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 07:49 PM
1

So “men’s sheds”, and then a few descriptions of generic group types that don’t generally exist for men outside of “sports groups”? Ok, even if that list weren’t just random non-specific descriptions of group types, what exactly are women doing to support these “groups”?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 07:40 PM
1

Oh, ok. I must be reading and responding to someone else’s comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 07:34 PM
1

Loads? Such as?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 07:23 PM
1

You absolutely don’t have to be respectful to anyone. That’s your choice. Be as foul as you like, truly. Unfortunately it’s also a bad look if you’re trying to convince people that you hold some fair and balanced viewpoint.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 07:20 PM
2

Most of your comments are pretty minimizing of men’s issues, and any sort of responsibility women have to interact with those issues as members of the same society. Like many women here, your comments are casually hostile and disrespectful to men, which is exactly my point. You demonstrate no empathy for men, but you expect it in return. It’s just a generally shitty way to treat other people.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 07:14 PM
1

Nothing is wrong with it, but that’s absolutely not what men get from women. Women do not support men’s groups, and frequently oppose them in practice.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 07:07 PM
1

Yup, learn to read.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 07:04 PM
2

Straw man. Men don’t want women to solve their problems for them. At this point I think most men would be happy just not being treated like sub-human trash with problems not worth acknowledging in any semblance of good faith or empathy. You clearly don’t care about men. That’s your choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 07:03 PM
1

Mostly hateful bullshit and comparing men to wild animals. Feminism seems far more monolithic and regressive than it used to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 06:56 PM
1

No, that’s actually not a threat.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 06:55 PM
1

“Men should be feminists” “Men should form their own groups” (because feminism isn’t actually about egalitarianism) Gimme a break.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 06:54 PM
1

There is absolutely conflict with male rights. Most self described feminists on Reddit can’t even acknowledge that men have real issues that affect them, let alone participate in steps to help mitigate for those issues. Men’s well-being is largely treated as zero sum, and it leaves me (and others) feeling entirely unsympathetic to women’s issues. I think that could change, but not so long as women casually treat men as sub-human trash.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 06:51 PM
2

That only makes sense if feminists were for equality, which they largely aren’t anymore. I used to be a feminist, but as a man it just feels like an abusive relationship anymore. Pass.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 06:46 PM
1

I see zero threats. Just making things up today, I guess?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 06:41 PM
2

Actually this is just more of the same garbage you incessantly post every. single. day. I’d suggest leaving your house once in a while.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 04:27 AM
1

What you wrote is maybe in the best interests of women with borderline personality disorder, but certainly not women as a group. This is apparently coming from someone with apparently no real relationship experience. Enjoy repulsing potential partners with your toxic transactionalism. You should repeat some more of your sad regressive viewpoints. It’s pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 01:52 AM
4

In what context? That question in a vacuum is somewhat nonsensical. If she’s single, maybe not much. If she’s married, then maybe her agreed upon side of the finances or domestic home tasks. If she has kids, then her agreed upon share of the child rearing activities. etc. Adults are responsible for adulting. People have varying degrees of success including other people in shared adulting responsibilities. “Should’s and shouldn’ts” seem mostly irrelevant to me as it’s largely a matter of preferen…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 11:31 PM
2

I own my home outright, my taxable account alone is over 7 figures, I’m buying a car next week for about $70k cash, and I’ve been in a relationship for the last decade. Try again.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 11:05 PM
3

He didn’t say “only”, that drastically changes the meaning of the statement. You’re misrepresenting/misunderstanding the comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 10:42 PM
2

And attention seeking.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 10:39 PM
1

K
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 10:20 PM
2

Summary: “Bla bla bla”, “(transactional materialistic FDS viewpoint)”, “bla bla bla”. You’re for the streets, a bullet to be aggressively dodged by any respectable man. But hey, good luck never being in a healthy relationship. It’s a real loss for the fellas, lemme tell ya.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 10:18 PM
1

I don’t care who you are. Your daily posts are low quality trash, and you clearly have trouble relating to and understanding people. Sometimes I think it’s intentional because you’re bitter, and sometimes I genuinely wonder if you’re autistic. Either way, I’m truly happy to not know you. Good luck with your next femcel-esque post.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 10:09 PM
1

F-boys prioritize sex. Materialistic women prioritize money. Generalizing this to entire genders is dumb, and mostly just speaks to a likely lack of experience on your part. Well-adjusted people who understand how to have healthy relationships do not typically have views like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 09:59 PM
2

Gotcha, men’s value is dictated solely by their finances? Cool cool. That’s certainly a very regressively inequitable perspective, and doesn’t indicate that you’re bringing much to the table yourself. You place wayyy too much value on your vagina, it’s gross.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 09:22 PM
1

You probably have a job, go provide for yourself. You’re not entitled to other people’s money. This is deadbeat mooch behavior, nothing more.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 08:34 PM
1

It’s pure entitlement to expect your date to treat you on a first date, period. Who are you again? Great way to sabotage a relationship with inequity before it’s even started. Also a great way for men to filter out superficial deadbeat women who are looking for dancing monkeys and cheap prizes instead of genuine human connection. Those women are certainly acting like “whores”, but they offer an even less satisfying result. These women are mostly absent of value for any self-respecting man lookin…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 08:27 PM
2

You’re not ugly at all. However, insecurity is toxic, and will torpedo a lot of relationships/prospects. Getting a handle on your self-talk is always going to be a good thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/25 04:41 PM
–

What the hell are you even talking about? This whole post comes across as extremely vain and childishly immature.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/25 03:51 PM
1

Do you do anything other than post here all day? Every day, multiple posts. Do you really have nothing better to do? It’s pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 07:13 PM
1

What a thoughtful reply, Karen.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 07:12 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter