TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

UVIV Archive

View 4 posts and 123 comments by UVIV on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

What a load of crap. I’m saying pursue her to a point where she does appreciate the efforts and genuineness from the man. Also, your view is just entirely self-centered and entitled as well. This is situational. It has nothing to do with age or location, except how it is played out. A man in his 40s, carrying a bouquet of roses, waiting in the airport lounge for a woman. They may know each other. And by the third time he’s done this, some women will fall in love with this gesture, even though th…
/r/seduction08/08/24 06:04 AM
2

Yeah, some basic social cues you need to read and understand. Don’t be a dork or a geek that can’t read social cues or the air. Back away if NO means actually no. Unless that NO is a caveat NO, which is up to interpretation. Like if she giggles with the NO, it’s probably not a NO, but a yes.
/r/seduction06/08/24 05:02 AM
2

When JP Morgan met his second wife Frances Louisa "Fanny" Tracy, Tracey wasn’t interested at first when Morgan initiated the pursuit. It took a bunch of hurdles and Morgan’s persistence that eventually Trace caved in to Morgan’s demands. Later on, this couple had 4 kids, and JP Morgan was on his way to become America’s number one fanancier and the wealthiest man in the world in 19th and early 20th century.
/r/seduction06/08/24 05:01 AM
1

Chandler? You mean this guy from Friends? chandler
/r/seduction05/08/24 11:27 AM
1

Dude, how’s that much different between a creep and a “high value man”? Women constantly do this racist bullshit to separate men into two categories. It’s simply impossible to see these people as inherently racist and don’t deserve respect. Ok, so if a guy is a creep, he doesn’t deserve respect? How do you define a creep? Right? It’s inherently used as a way to racially segregate people. I don’t act like a creep but I don’t like how women act this way. Kevin Samuels literally said this “Conditio…
/r/seduction05/08/24 10:47 AM
0

Are women really worth “expensive surgery that might break your legs”? Man I don’t know about women. Some stupid bitches and bimbos may stay after they realize your secret. I dont know. I don’t think these bitches are worth breaking my legs for.
/r/seduction05/08/24 09:07 AM
0

It’s bullshit. Limb lengthening will literally break your legs if your recovery isn’t done well. What happens if she knows that you weren’t tall before the surgery? Will she accept the relationship or marriage?
/r/seduction05/08/24 09:06 AM
3

I think creep is only seen as a creep when you aren’t open, straightforward and transparent enough with your intentions. Also when you don’t back away when clear defensive or hostile signal is sent out. Keep pursuing would be seen as “creepy”. For me, it’s always 3 genuine attempts. I feel like as a man, you need to go after what you want. That defines you as a man. Be a lil persistent with your intention. First time rejection, try a second time. Second time rejection, try a third time. And if s…
/r/seduction05/08/24 09:02 AM
13

It’s bullshit. As a man you are supposed to go after what you want. First time rejection doesn’t mane a second time rejection. Sometimes persistent pursuit does work and some women appreciate the fact that you are willing to pursue them hard enough. Women operate by emotions. They’d reject you just because the weather is too hot. Also, a man who can’t commit to his desire isn’t seen as non-needy. Look, I don’t think there’s a clear line as to what to do is correct. Women don’t make the first mov…
/r/seduction05/08/24 08:51 AM
1

I’m not a model, so no success on dating apps. I’ve even lost dates, because the girl, after arranging the date, asked for more photos, and as she didn’t liked them, she decided to cancel. Plus, how do you show how your height? Even short girls look tall in photos. I don’t get it. Why do they need your photos and ask for more photos? These women sound creepier than any average woman. Plus, I don’t see a way to show the money to flirt. I mean, would you go to a girl and say something like: hey! I…
/r/seduction05/08/24 08:41 AM
1

I think it’s because I’m broke. But the fucking problem is, I can get women if I want. The problem is that I am investing into people that I am not particularly interested in. It’s like spending money and time for a dog-shit product that you are not interested in. Another problem is I wanna be able to pick. I want pick women instead of women picking me. I find it so bullshit that they “have to” sit on the high horse and pick and choose every single ducking time! It’s so unfair! I don’t give a sh…
/r/seduction05/08/24 08:14 AM
1

But I don’t think it’s possible to spark attraction if you two don’t know each other that well. What if either of you has a heart wall (defensive mechanism) that has to be lowered down before getting more intimate? There won’t be that many “hot right off the bat” incidents.
/r/seduction05/08/24 08:11 AM
1

Then why do they reject you?
/r/seduction05/08/24 08:08 AM
1

Same here. Fuck women cost so much money. Like why do they cost so much money like fuck? What to do when you’re in a fucking communist country where making money is so ducking difficult and unrealistic?
/r/seduction05/08/24 08:07 AM
1

Is there any way to change this? Elon Musk has Asperger’s and he’s got multiple kids.
/r/seduction05/08/24 08:05 AM
0

Some people from some culture are racist by default. For example, Chinese from mainland, specifically Chinese women, see black people as inherently i-word. They are racist by default. The culture sees black people as i-word. However, there are Chinese women who mate with black people as well. Either way, I’m just saying, people from another culture can be racist by default, and their women specifically are giant ducking racists as well.
/r/seduction05/08/24 08:03 AM
0

Some minority does so well in game? I remember an Indian guy, literally an Indian guy, pulling women left and right. He’s from Canada nationality-wise. But his ethnicity is completely Indian blood. Brown skin, Indian hair etc. It’s 100% not western beauty standards. He’s a YouTuber. He just pulls women left and right in Southeast Asia, like insane.
/r/seduction05/08/24 08:01 AM
1

It’s not the fact that I am afraid. It’s more of that fact that I am too disgusted. I see them as inferior (only towards a specific race, I find other women from other cultures pretty fucking fine) and despicable. I just find them too disgusting to be around with, not worth my time and attention. Also, most of them look like whores to me, incredibly low value and really, just really, despicable.
/r/seduction05/08/24 07:59 AM
1

How do you buy height???
/r/seduction05/08/24 07:56 AM
3

It’s so bullshit this list. So many factors are uncontrollable. You can’t control your height? You also can’t control you dick size. Also your looks. Why do women care so much about the uncontrollable stuff it’s so unfair. If a short guy wins a tall guy in a race, it’s his effort that makes him shine, not his height. We don’t reward a person’s hard work and now we reward their congenital gifts? Like what the fuck?
/r/seduction05/08/24 07:54 AM
1

I thought the whole “small and thin” dick is a myth? Many open studies suggest it’s the movement that’s more important than size isn’t it? Girth and diameter matter more than length. In that case, how are men with “small and thin” dicks going to survive? It’s genetics and they will be what? No wife no kids forever?
/r/seduction05/08/24 07:50 AM
0

Dude having sex with women is bullshit
/r/seduction05/08/24 07:48 AM
1

What do you think they are interested in? A specific type? I’m a puppy/golden retriever guy too. Women are complicated.
/r/seduction05/08/24 07:47 AM
1

That I am broke?
/r/seduction05/08/24 07:46 AM
1

I suppose, by Mystery’s book, you use your survival value (special power, resources) as a man to exchange replication value (sexually appealing, beautiful) of a woman?
/r/seduction30/07/24 04:52 AM
–

Great response.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 03:16 AM
–

Got it. Sounds like you need to pull yourself out a minute and think clearly and objectively that whether you've done something wrong, or it's just a manipulation tactic she uses to get you do something for her. My question is, why doesn't she just "do" the thing she wants to do herself? (Like you don't have your hands?) Why do they (women) have to be so annoying to be around with?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 03:14 AM
–

I'm talking about real life as well. I've dealt with disrespectful women before, not the best situation you ever wanna put yourself in.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 03:07 AM
1

If your wife has banged 9 different guys and it is true, you should just literally fuck this old friend's brain's out. Take pictures, and tell your wife she's a piece of shit and you're gonna end the marriage on court. Anyway man, it's insane to hear that your wife has banged 9 men. There is no excuse, there is absolutely no excuse that you should keep this marriage alive. If you did not lie in this post, if your wife really banged 9 guys, come the fuck on man, why the fuck are you still in this…
/r/seduction18/05/24 11:28 AM
2

Most of the time when you ask advice from a woman it’ll only be applicable to that woman. You ask her, “How do I respond to women if they say xxx?” She will tell you the best response she likes and it will never be applicable to another woman. Because: A. They can’t generalize. B. They can’t be objective. C. The woman is almost always focusing on her self rather than the woman you are referring to. (Because they are all narcissistic as shit.) You can listen to what they advise, but don’t be too …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 09:21 AM
6

Women are so retarded. Like why do you have to act you don’t care to attract the person. The first paragraph is correct, if you care you have more feelings. This is the right logic. But you need to care less in order to have more. It totally doesn’t make sense and it sounds counterintuitive. Bro why are women this way?
/r/seduction14/05/24 09:03 AM
1

The one who gives is the romantic, not the other way around. It's not a means to an end. More like if women constantly demand "gifts" and we shower them with "gifts", then we fuck. It's literally just sexual transaction, whoring someone, or prostitution. People that constantly demand shit without giving are unattractive. But they want it anyway and we give them anyway because we want that pussy. This tells me enough that women are just a bunch of whores. We'd like to make this more transcendent …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 11:52 AM
1

My point: Women need to be reality-checked. A. Realize that they are delusional. B. They simply can't go that high to pick for the best if they aren't there yet. Or to be blunt, you don't deserve it. C. You can't ask for more if you can't provide as much. This should've always been mutually reciprocal. D. Bash that reality to their face as hard as possible, get them realize and consciously in their head that, "Oh, I'm going wayyyyyyyy out of my league here." Otherwise this madness isn't going to…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 03:17 AM
1

It's women, it's always about them, not other people. Just mememememememememe. Incredible.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 02:51 AM
1

I got exactly a friend like that, tall good looking and a bunch of friends. But he's married and only got one wife he needs to deal with.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 03:51 AM
3

It’s impossible to pinpoint the exact definition, or standards of a “high-value man.” As far as I’m concerned, everything is contextual. Also, from the podcast, I believe it’s a very loose definition of what a “high value man” is supposed to be. Successful, muscular and masculine. Is there actually a bar to determine the line to be “successful”? From Kevin Samuels’ point of view, you need to at least make more than 150k to even contend the HVM title. I can’t remember which video, but he made a v…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 12:45 AM
4

Well does gaming her and smashing her right away count?
/r/seduction05/04/24 10:34 PM
1

Roger that
/r/seduction21/03/24 12:47 PM
1

Some people are new to this. Many don't understand the concepts. Plus, if Mystery explicitly mentioned the definitions in his book, I wouldn't need to post it.
/r/seduction21/03/24 12:35 PM
2

So basically for modern times, survival value = my money or my family's money replication value = her hotness? (physical attractiveness)
/r/seduction21/03/24 12:34 PM
1

I hope that more people can see this.
/r/seduction21/03/24 10:43 AM
1

Hey, thanks Clara for your in-depth analysis. I've DMed you. If you interested, wanna hit the chat and we can move on from there?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 08:35 AM
2

Nah, don't give me this. If you believe what I am doing is wrong, then counter with the "right" example. You can't just observe what I said, then gave me a piece of feedback that I did it wrong. Tell me something that I don't know?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 12:08 PM
1

Then what’s the “right” way?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 11:22 AM
1

Nuke bomb. Incredible.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 03:31 AM
1

Well hello there
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 03:20 AM
1

You again. Sigh. Ok. So let me explain: If a woman doesn’t come to a scheduled date due to her emotional problems, i.e. she doesn’t feel good today, she overslept, she felt dizzy, she felt weird etc., that’s being emotional. As a man, we don’t cancel an appointment just because we don’t feel like it. It’s like a doctor’s appointment, would you ever miss your doctor’s appointment if you “don’t feel like it”? We call women “illogical” for many reasons. A lot of times is because what they say is co…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 03:12 AM
0

It’s not how I feel. This is what I think. From my dating experience and my observation. I’ve dated 20 - 30 women in 6 months and most of these women tend to present similar characters. Timid, shy, chibi, reserved, uninitiated, kind of stupid (no offense), relatively self-centered (she believes everything that happens to her is catering to her for granted, not the fact that you are expecting her to do something back).
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 02:17 AM
1

Well men hope the attention from the women transforms into sex. This is where simping happens. It almost never transforms into sex, since their attention is valueless. If you are a 7 man, and you seek attention from a 4 woman. If she still stalls for you, it’s a major blow to your face and your dignity. It’s like begging a freaking 4 to give you her valueless attention? What’s more humiliating than that? First, expecting women’s attention to transform into sex is pointless and put men in an incr…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 01:59 AM
1

Attraction is a combination of looks (your face, body weight, and height) and characteristics such as stoic, masculine, ambitious, confident, passionate, charming, charismatic. You have to max out your best traits about yourself and present that to women. Have a sense of style, make sure you’re in shape or not obese at least. Keep your hair done and pick a hair style that suits your face and be very charming. A charming confident man exudes sex appeal. Duly noted.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 01:52 AM
-4

Women complain about being sexualized and objectified from random men she doesn’t know. Just like it’s wrong for men to be objectified from women he doesn’t know. This is so nonsensical. Men don’t care whether they’d get “objectified” by a random woman or not. Most men feel proud and happy if they do, albeit it can still constitute as molestation. Yes women do complain about men only wanting sex because they want to be liked for their personality. You are only presenting your sex honey. Most of …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 01:43 AM
0

men offer these things because they desire the attention of a woman Attention of a woman is valueless. Her sex means something. Her attention is absolutely valueless. Attractive men get the best treatment from a woman. Okay. If the root of the symptom is attractiveness. How to become more attractive? What constitutes attractiveness? Is it just looks alone? Or is there something else that presents sex appeal?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 01:30 AM
1

This is absolutely true. Results have to come with actions. I don’t think the core problem is really that complicated—financial issues, game, status and all that. Most people don’t get shit because they haven’t put into enough effort to get shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 01:14 AM
0

A. You just admitted that relationships are in essence, prostitution. Men’s resources for women’s sex. This is sexual transaction. B. 50 years ago, a rose bouquet was enough to win a random woman over. Today, you need 6-6-6: 6 inch dick, 6 figure bank account, 6 packs. I call this bullshit. Women need to be useful. Beauty & sex don’t mean shit if you can’t be useful to men. Because beauty & sex are the least thing you can offer, and you are offering factory-setting functionalities for money and …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 12:50 AM
–

B word, most men these days get pussy by paying. In the forms of dates, favors, or other shit the woman asks the man for. Andrew does dislike the his girlfriends. He simply doesn’t believe that women are capable of being intelligent. Once he pulled up a phone and asked one of his girls to send him $50,000 right away. And the woman did. Many of his examples literally destroy your theories here for what women find attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 03:26 AM
–

Woman, those murderers are passively obsessed by women. Many of these men's occult female followers never ever were approached by these violent men. These women simply got aroused by the fact that these men are crazy psychopaths—neurotic and strong mood-swings. Also, I wanna point out the fact that Andrew Tate, the famous "misogynist", is incredibly anxious and paranoid. He'd put an axe on his bed just so that nobody comes in and tries to kill him, and he can grab the axe and kill his assassin. …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 07:20 AM
1

Whatever
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 02:41 AM
1

Well. Men find submissive and agreeable women attractive. Men don’t find combative and dependent women attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 02:39 AM
1

How about go do the things yourself first then ask others to be on your standards? Become non-neurotic first then ask the other party to be non-neurotic. You seem to have this chip around and think you just “deserve” or “entitle” to toss around standards that “men have to cater to.”
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 02:37 AM
1

Okay? I was speaking about men and women in general but sure make it personal if you like. Whatever this is proves my point. A lot of people have anxiety issues. It's a common thing. Why don't women learn to accept that not everybody is perfect, and even "they themselves" can be neurotic as well? 🤷🏼‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 02:27 AM
1

Submissiveness and dependency highly correlate. Either lots of men are submissive. Doesn’t mean women find it attractive. You just flipped the script and changed the frame intentionally. I said women being submissive. Not men. Most men aren't submissive. The majority of men are independent. I never even mentioned whether "women" find it attractive or not now you have jumped in and said women don't find it attractive. Who cares whether women find it attractive or not? I'm talking about men's pref…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 02:23 AM
2

I think most people are neurotic. Why do you assume that women enjoy non-neurotic men? Anxiety is a daily thing. The people with less anxiety don't mean they perform well. On the contrary, it's the people with high neuroticism that perform well. I'm pretty sure many of the "top" examples you mentioned have more or less anxiety going on in their lives as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 01:51 AM
–

Don’t work. Even you go approach an uggo, you get the same shit as well. Entitlement, thinks she fucking deserve shit from you. Bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 03:24 AM
–

From my personal experience, women don’t even give a shit to you if you aren’t rich enough. We tried the personality first, looks second route. That shit didn’t work. Then we resorted to looks only to see if we can at least gain something back from the relationship. You think we wanted to rate? But when we don’t even rate, they just get even more entitled in the process. I literally tried to give some women a chance, even though them uggos, you think they gave a fuck when I did that? Women, does…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 03:16 AM
–

God damn selfish bitches. There I said it. They are SELFISH! “Rules for thee but not for me!” S E L F I S H!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 11:03 AM
–

Gotcha. My broken english understanding lol. But attaining “popular” status on campus was kind of a top-tier status, no? Was there any higher status than being the cool kid, or the jock, or the college football team player? Doctor is also considered, conventionally, a high-status profession. Is there high-status than a doctor in western society?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 05:22 AM
–

This doesn’t make any sense. You are basically saying being popular on campus doesn’t attract women at all? For real?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 04:58 AM
0

the number of std-infected women more than the number of sexless men.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 04:05 PM
11

It’s numbers. If women contract more STDs and the number of STD infected women are more than the men who are having no sex. This kind of proves OP’s point.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 03:57 PM
1

Nice guys are the worst is not a blue pill belief. Blue pill believes that you should be a NICE guy. If you are alone then there’s something wrong with you is also not a blue pill belief.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 03:53 AM
1

I think guys tend to right swipe too much. They’d fuck a refrigerator labeled as a female.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/24 03:46 PM
1

The same goes for unattractive women as well though. They are born ugly, there's nothing they can do to secure a good mate. Whereas as a man, you can still improve other areas of life---money, staus, looks & game. By looks I mean your physique.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/24 11:53 AM
1

Feisty. I’ll take a look.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/24 09:46 AM
1

If we look at how attractiveness of a man correlates with his lifetime sexual partners, there is weak correlation. Putting the average unattractive guy within ~2 sex partners of the average attractive guy. Where do you get this from? Can you cite a source?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/24 08:36 AM
1

By the rule of hypergamy, they don’t get nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/24 08:33 AM
1

I think it’s going to be incredibly hard to find a woman of similar competence level. I know what you are saying, but that’s just hard. I dated like 30-ish women from the past 2 years. I know exactly what you are talking about, about you wanting “an equal”. It’s really hard to find a woman that can match your competence level and provide significant help in your life. From my experience, you are actually adding value to her life, instead of the other way around. Go find a brother. Men’s problems…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 08:07 PM
1

Haha that’s a good one.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 08:01 PM
1

It is. I mean, my previous standards didn’t work. Even though there was this rule—if you are not attractive, your great personality can be a compensation. But it doesn’t fly this way. The options are so bad, I basically can’t get anything out of dating them. They aren’t useful and they can’t provide any value to me. For example, I dated a girl that was like a 3, and the first thing she mentioned in the date was that she wanted a clinical doctor to be with her. She wanted that and she believed sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 07:48 PM
1

They look at the top 10-20% of men, and then choose partners from that 10-20%. It doesn't matter what the woman's own SMV is. That's why hypergamy is so brutal. I don’t think this is hypergamy anymore. If all they look for is the top 10% - 20%, it’s elite-men-philia. Hypergamy is supposed to function between a level 7 guy and a level 4 chick. If a level 4 chick eyes for only level 9 dudes. This is basically fucked. It’s like telling men under 9 to all go fuck themselves. They ain’t gonna get lai…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 07:31 PM
1

I’m increasingly concerned about the fact that this made-up top 1% concept from men is a sure-fire way to either A. Induce even more hoeflation over the years and cave into the delusional standards women have B. Play with the retarded rhetorics initiated from undeserving women because “they simply believed they deserve a 10 even though she’s a 4 or she’s a woman” Also the fact that 1% is incredibly unspecific. Who is he? A name? Income to the second number after the dot? Profession? Background? …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 08:45 PM
1

Then it doesn’t exist. 🤷🏼‍♂️ You will never be satiated because the concept is never defined. If it’s never defined, it means you can artificially inflate it to a never-ending degree, where no one, not even the prince in your romance novel, can hit that standard. It’s evil, because this will keep you in power. And you will always keep the right to interpret. Absolutely disgusting. In my honest opinion, absolutely nonsense. I wouldn't give 2 fucks about delusional standards from those who don't e…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 08:15 PM
1

My point being, very very nicely put, any kind of generic concept needs to become specific for it to have reality power. If it’s simply a concept, then it can’t touch the ground. Thus it’s groundless and baseless and doesn’t exist in reality. Even Brad Pitt has some kind of flaws as well. He’s not perfect. Nobody is. Everybody in life has some kind of problems and it’s understandable. We are all human beings. If that “1%” doesn’t have a specific image, then it’s just a fantasy, not real life. It…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 07:55 PM
0

I don’t know if we’re talking about the same situation but I can relate. If “doing tricks for the pussy” means running errands for a woman you wanna fuck, I met quite many of those. I don’t know what the fuck is wrong with these females. But it seems that if you don’t do their little errands, they ain’t gonna open their legs for you. I don’t know why, it seems to be some kind of female mechanism. They’ll use their errands (you need to do it) to establish a connection with you, no matter how stup…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 07:44 PM
0

Probably frame it better. You are not in her frame and you are not at her mercy for being a circus clown. You’re here to take what you want, that’s it. Besides, you always have the walk-away power. I don’t think 304s give a shit about whether they are relationship materials or not. At the very least, most women that I encountered are very self-centered and wouldn’t give 2 fucks about that they can be either girlfriend or wifey materials. Because that would be standing in YOUR shoes to think from…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 07:40 PM
0

And that 1% being? Is there a specific image of that 1%? Who is he? Any representation? A name? His backgrounds? His education? His income?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 07:28 PM
1

That’s the masculine essence! Shoot to kill. I’m here for business, and I aim to achieve my god damn goal! None of that female bullshit type of garbage “ehhh she’s thinking about other men ehhhh she ain’t a girlfriend material.” What kind of stupid shit is that? You are a man. You are not supposed to behave and think like a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 07:25 PM
1

“Women consider other men aren’t girlfriend materials.” What are you on? Chicks on tinder are constantly considering other men as viable options. You are also not OP as well. You don’t get to be the prize, specifically when you are in a 1 woman - 2 men situation. She’s the prize. You two are vying for her attention and affection. Understand the power dynamics first then speak. I think a lot of times you guys don’t get shit is because these weird beliefs in your heads.You don’t get to declare you…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 07:20 PM
2

I think your mindset is wrong. If something is highly sought after, expect competition. Things that are not valuable, nobody wants it. Embrace competition and win. My advice: Assault and advance! Make your move! Do it before the other guy does it! This is the exiting part about dating. Dating is a speed, time, opportunity kind of game. It’s almost like trading stocks and investing, or getting into an entrepreneurial venture. It has risks and rewards, just not to a scale of startups. You are a ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 06:09 PM
1

Then you need to define it though. What constitutes as high status.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 06:03 PM
0

There were many problems initially when I set those standards. I mean these standards still hold for me for a serious long-term relationship. But after I probed the market of where I lived a bit, I quickly found out that the women I could reach didn’t meet those standards at all. Almost 90% of them were immediately disqualified the moment I got to know who they were. I saw that building a long-term relationship here was quite impossible, thus I switched my direction to completely pursue short-te…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 05:22 PM
1

I am. I am attracted to these cute chubby thick girls who make less than me but that doesn’t guarantee me sex after several dates with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 03:44 PM
1

Possible, then there’s nothing I can do. They’ll stay single and I’ll have to walk away.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 03:24 PM
1

In essence, I need more charm and looks to get laid? Is that correct? Charm, can I interpret it as “game”? Charismatic conversation, being able to tap into others’ emotions and control how they feel during the conversation. Being very game-aware. And looks, I’ll say your outfit, your face (genetics) and your physique (hitting the gym)? Am I correct? If I improve these areas, will getting laid become easier? Maybe guaranteed? Just asking. 🫣
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 03:18 PM
-1

Women expect men to initiate. He can do nothing if he can’t initiate. Learn game, learn how to initiate and approach. Go learn with some PUA stuff, some of them are very helpful for you to open women. Or shadow some dating coaches.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 02:58 PM
2

Will try. Thanks for the pro tips!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 02:51 PM
1

Incredible.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 02:46 PM
1

Nope, already in work now haha.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 02:33 PM
1

Definitely, will try! I like learning languages and learn perspectives from people of different cultures. Also, taking a walk alongside a park.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 02:22 PM
2

You are right. Connection is hard these days, especially if it does require shared values, worldviews, similar experiences etc. I don't click with most people due to the fact that my experience has been way too unique. But I do possess some of the traits you mentioned, kindness, some money in my pockets, no power whatsoever, values, philosophies, sense of humor and knowing to take care of my looks. Good advice though.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 02:17 PM
1

You're a good person.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 02:13 PM
0

If women ONLY fucked men of higher status than themselves. Then this does NOT logically mean that they fuck EVERY man with higher status than themselves. It could be that they only fuck the most attractive men of higher status than themselves. I mean... This makes sense, but it's like a subset of men and it's a combo of "very attractive" + "high social status"? Hypergamy, again, according to wikipedia Hypergamy is a social science term that refers to the act of dating or marrying someone with a …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 02:02 PM
1

I don't know how to respond to this, but basically what you are saying... "Try dating some conventionally unattractive women, maybe things will work out better." I think I've given up a lot of standards from dating for a couple of years. Initially, there were education, income, attractiveness, language, values, personality, personal traits and other stuff going on. Initially, I was like, if you are not that attractive, your personality can be a compensation. Right now, the only thing I ask for i…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 01:49 PM
3

I suppose that's true. Most men and women are probably just lamenting why the last date didn't work instead of going out there and socializing more. I'm into older women, MILFs are absolutely attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 01:26 PM
1

the problem is that you don't understand the concept of SEXUAL CAPITAL (looks+fitness) nor the concept of SOCIAL STATUS(power+influence). Is there anything I can read about for these 2 concepts? Sexual Capital and Social Status.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 01:18 PM
1

But it's not that easy to get laid though. That's the point of this post.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 01:15 PM
0

I think the whole point of me dating down is to find women that are cute and chubby (thick? even better) and make less than me, so that things can become easier. But if you ask me to go lower, women that are not cute, not chubby & thick... 🙄 Why do I have to subject myself to such agony? When I'm not even sexually attracted to the person in the first place. 😂🙃 But thanks for the advice though.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 01:12 PM
3

Then I guess personality compatibility is bigger than what TRP has been preaching for - your money, looks, status & game will be the determinator of how these relationships function, whether long-term or short-term.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 12:55 PM
1

That’s my point. If getting sex is hard either way, why not just spend you time dating within your own level? Dating down doesn’t necessarily reduce the difficulty of getting sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 12:44 PM
–

I second this.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 08:52 PM
5

You need to be worth it. At the very least, I believe everything in life functions on the “worth it” scale. If a woman has delusional standards, she’s not worth it to her delusional standards. Because if she’s actually worth it, she’d be already getting what she wants in the first place. You are only worth what you are getting at. If you want more, work for it. I’ve never seen a woman being able to have what she claims she wants without working for it. The same goes for men as well. Anything you…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 08:42 PM
1

Who’s the person? You got a link or a name?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/24 02:35 PM
1

This doesn’t make any sense. Any kind of full-blown gender hate is uncalled for. This makes no sense. “That man hates all women but he likes me, thus I am special!” It’s just dumb. If a person is a full-blown misogynist, his worldview is pretty much built on any actions taken by women can be seen as bad, which is really uncalled for. It’s the same with women as well. If she’s a misandrist, and any actions taken by men can be seen as bad or inferior, again, uncalled for. It’s incredibly stupid th…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 05:53 AM
–

Probably because you’ve grown over the years as well. It’s like the investment starts to pay off now and you’re just collecting the passive income and dividends.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/24 07:49 AM
–

Bro nothing against you, but it was either a struggle or you did well. There's no way "struggling" and "do well" co-exist. It doesn't make any sense. It's cool. I get that guys kind of like to boast a little bit even though it wasn't that big of a deal. But I do admire and respect your lifestyle and your socialization skills. I dont' know man. I guess it does get easier huh when you are relatively experienced and also getting your money right your body right and your status right, and possibly y…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/24 06:47 AM
–

What does your current high-value consist of? Care to elaborate how high-value you are?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/24 06:16 AM
1

Ok ok. Chill. Look, I just wanna learn MILF game. I have mommy issues and I’m absolutely into moms and incest type of shit. Older women are incredibly attractive and delicious to me. Just trynna fulfill some fantasies. D’you know any sources to learn MILF game or is it covered in your subreddit?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/24 12:17 AM
1

Gotcha I’m still learning game so far I’m into MILFs. I just wanna bag as many hot mommies as possible. Not very into the older guy younger girl kinda thing, feels creepy to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 04:37 PM
1

Most of the times, no. But I’d do it for a friend or a client.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 04:36 PM
1

This one? https://np.reddit.com/r/UncleVasya/s/OzLn5VCrFr
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 03:13 PM
1

Never doing anything for women sounds extreme. Does “opening doors” for women count?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 03:07 PM
1

BTW do you mind sharing how you run your tight and on-point games?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 07:51 AM
1

This means things don’t become easier, it’s just you become more experienced… Women still aren’t going to send themselves automatically to you, unless you do provide some kinds of value, good looks, good game, good experience etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 07:47 AM
1

So how to do that? Improving mindset and worldview.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 07:38 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter