TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

UddersMakeMeShudder Archive

View 0 posts and 109 comments by UddersMakeMeShudder on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

I find it odd that you're accusing people of being deluded and requiring therapy in one sentence, then in the other casting the actions of a tiny minority onto 50% of the human race based on sex/gender alone. For reference, imagine somebody had said anything similar using race as a basis - That's how bad it comes across to others
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 03:19 PM
3

I thought for male incels it stayed 'Femoid', I was under the impression that 'Moid' was just the male equivalent to 'femoid'.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 09:32 AM
7

BMI is a poor method in general, but women find it much harder than men to gain muscle-mass, so it tends to be less skewed for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 01:41 PM
2

Average salary for CEOs in the UK is between £80 - 150K p/a, and bear in mind that this is a shared position.
/r/MensRights08/06/22 08:30 PM
2

Well, yeah, I mean he is scum but I was mostly just bringing him up in reference to the salary the position attracts lmao
/r/MensRights08/06/22 08:09 PM
9

This isn't sensationalist journalism purely for the fact of the amounts being paid. I don't know if you're English, but for reference, a member of Parliament will be paid around £85,000 p/a. The Prime Minister is paid £160,000 p/a. For a four day working week, she is out-earning the leader of the country by more than 4 and a half times.
/r/MensRights08/06/22 09:52 AM
25

Not sure I should bother replying but- Unsure what you mean when you say "Maybe it should. But it won't, because then vile rapist men won't be able to get away with it by downgrading things to SA." In the UK if you assault somebody using your penis (that is, penis into any bodily cavity) then it is legally rape. You can't downgrade that to SA unless you avoid using your penis but touch somebody else with any other part of your body. I personally believe that a 'Made to penetrate' definition shou…
/r/MensRights04/05/22 03:02 PM
25

If the Sun, a UK newspaper, published an article like this about Jews, not only would that likely result in jail time for the author, the editor would be at best fired, at worst convicted alongside. The paper would be dragged into national scandal and I'm not sure if it would survive. The general public aren't supportive of this kind of thing, but that doesn't matter. The people who support it are a London elite who have multiple times more influence in lawmaking
/r/MensRights28/11/20 10:09 AM
45

I feel I should add some legal context here, because although the media is almost entirely total scumbags these days, people shouldn't lose faith in the legal system entirely as I saw them doing in another thread. The problem with Depp's case against the sun is that libel in the US and the UK have vastly different standards. In the US the burden of proof is on the person bringing the claim, in the UK the burden of proof is on the journalist or news paper. Usually this means it's a more easily ar…
/r/MensRights05/11/20 02:22 AM
34

Fully agreed, and it's a really odd legal requirement. I understand wanting to check against other demographics, but specifying sex and ethnicity is super weird.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 12:18 AM
21

Yeah, to an extent. The feminist intent is obvious behind the bill - As is the lack of an anti-corporate intent. Mostly due to the requirement for the inquired-about worker being opposite sex.
/r/MensRights20/10/20 11:03 PM
12

The article is misleading, the bill doesn't specify gender except for amendments to S78 Equality Act 2010. The only requirement is for the person you're inquiring about to be of the opposite sex. One worrying thing is that amendments to S78 would require employers to publish a document showing what course of action they are doing to reduce differences in both female and male pay, and pay of different ethnicities. This has the potential to legislate for pay equality depending on whether contextua…
/r/MensRights20/10/20 10:56 PM
29

The bill allows a right to know for any person, as long as the other person you're inquiring about is of the opposite sex. Google the name of the bill and there is a .parliament.uk website (as there is for all prospective legislation) outlining the bill, debates on it, and what stage of passing it's at. Links are on that website to the full bill.
/r/MensRights20/10/20 10:50 PM
59

When I was graduating from college I was at a dinner with a few teachers at the table - One was a music teacher, very experienced but had transferred to the school recently. He was saying that recently (This was 2014) he was increasingly limited by school regulation around singularly male teachers. He was no longer allowed to be alone around students, he couldn't give private music lessons, he couldn't even take a school band for a short walk into the town to do a choir or a performance. Female …
/r/MensRights19/10/20 09:29 AM
5

The difficulties boil down to how the law is applied. No such law exists, but a court judge may apply a law based on the strict wording, the ethos behind the wording, or on the ethos behind the law itself. All this is down to the judges' discretion, precedence aside. I imagine this decision could be appealed higher and higher, but ultimately it will probably come down to what 'summer' defines (is it 3 weeks or is it 3 months?) and whether cohabitation was very regular beyond that. The gifts prob…
/r/MensRights11/09/20 10:48 AM
7

to the OP who drew a false comparison of male vs female circumcision. Not sure where OP says this at all
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/20 04:40 PM
3

Fully agree. Most people bringing this up seem to have little idea how the foreskin works and what is lost when it's removed.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/20 04:33 PM
2

FDS isn't as well known or accessible as TRP. Extreme feminism replaces it in polite society
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/20 07:48 AM
3

I understand that NZ has an entirely different culture and set of contexts around guns, the UK is similar. But how does that affect the terms pro-/anti-gun? It seems to me that NZ is a significantly more anti-gun country, in that from what you've said, only a few specific reasons are accepted for ownership of firearms. Both in law and society, to the point that ownership of a gun for self defence is a morally unacceptable thing. I just don't see how that changes the meaning of the terms for you …
/r/MensRights26/08/20 06:27 AM
6

I'm not sure the other guy is saying you have to believe all people should own guns, I think generally pro gun means "I would leave it to the citizen to decide if they require or want a gun and to acquire one if they decide they do" Where anti gun would be "Guns should only be available for a specific purpose, which I (or the governmenr) shall decide"
/r/MensRights25/08/20 12:16 PM
16

I think there's a significant difference between "men who murder their pregnant partners" and regular "men", so your questions are kind of odd and difficult to answer. The vast majority of men aren't murdering their pregnant partners. At a guess, this is an interplay of the effects of being pregnant, and the statistics already present on domestic violence and murder. Most women who are murdered, are murdered by their partners - Pregnancy is known to cause a lot of hormonal issues which could pot…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/20 02:53 PM
1

I think that's slightly oversimplified - I think it boils down to what each ingroup faces compared to their perception of what the outgroup faces. Resentment breeds when an ingroup has a deep seated belief in their being 'worse off' yet sees more emphasis on outgroup problems which they see as less important. That resentment can too easily become hatred. It's not really mental laziness so much as emotional involvement - That's why if you find one of the "kill all men" type feminists, they cannot…
/r/MensRights28/05/20 11:00 AM
16

This is the same kind of logic which attempts to justify hatred of Muslims based on the actions of Islamic extremists
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/20 11:18 AM
6

I think you just made the assumption that the above dude's "you" referred to yourself, as opposed to the general you meaning one or oneself Weird brags though tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/20 09:24 AM
5

Just poppin in to say that there are very few men who think they arent allowed to cry nowadays, and those that do are likely already emotionally damaged in other ways Men know that there is a time to cry and a time to 'soldier on', and so many men I know prefer to wait until they're alone or around only those they trust to cry, myself included
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/20 07:04 AM
1

I'm with you up to the first trimester, IMO second is a bit late for abortions to continue ethically without some kind of extenuating circumstances
/r/MensRights14/05/20 09:33 AM
4

I agree with you to an extent, but you have to admit that social media companies tend to punish conservative variations of this behaviour without punishing left wing variations FaceBook only recently started to punish people for sharing and posting misandristic comments (which are more commonly a left wing thing), and a slew of articles afterwards indicated that these people aren't used to being moderated against
/r/MensRights14/05/20 09:24 AM
7

Feels like you're pushing a lot of feelings into this shitpost comic You okay bud?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/20 08:41 AM
3

There's certainly a lot of truth to what you've said. Especially re. The toxic aspects of the MRA scene - I think the problem with a lot of these movements is that they tend to attract damaged men, who have a tendency to convert that pain into anger. I guess helping men like that is one of the biggest goals for these groups to achieve As somebody from the UK I can agree it's crazy the US has still never seen a female president - Another thing that really surprises me is that the two female PMs w…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 12:32 PM
5

I find that interesting - I'm not MGTOW, but I advocate for mens rights as part of the step to gender equality. The reason MRAs use the MRA term is because feminism is simultaneously outwardly pro gender equality, but also inwardly female centric - and also culture dominant This was previously because women had the most pressing issues to solve on the path to equality, but now we're at a point where in my view, women have some minor problems (lack of representation in certain jobs, e.g.) while m…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 10:15 AM
5

Are you confusing mgtow and mens rights activism?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 08:25 AM
3

Incel-y? What do you mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/20 10:33 AM
2

I'm not the guy who said that, I just don't think it applies I don't know what the other guy was saying, but where I live pink hair is still fairly rare
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/20 10:24 AM
3

I'm not sure you know what camoflague is
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/20 07:03 AM
11

Mgtow and incels are very different things I thought mgtow was mainly men who had been fucked over in divorces or relationships
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/20 07:01 AM
4

I kNoW yOu ArE bUt WhAt Am I
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/20 06:58 AM
11

This is actually fairly rare, as usually theres little evidence to prove an accusation was knowingly false. In fact, we just the other year had a big investigation into false sexual assault and rape accusations in which the met police would fail to disclose crucial evidence to defense lawyers (like texts saying the sex was consensual for example) until the very last minute or the lawyers dredging up the information themselves
/r/MensRights04/05/20 11:48 PM
9

Must.. Hold back.... The feminism jokes...
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/20 09:13 AM
6

I'd agree, with the caveat that women tend to have more romantic relationships and/or ONS with men than men with women
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/20 09:11 AM
13

Dude's complaint seems to be more about the issues impacting their relationship than the existence of the issues themselves
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/20 09:08 AM
9

Alright, well then I should probably let you know you have no legal ability to control your 18 year old family members actions. You may see it as protecting them, but you aren't the one that makes that call - You can protest and tell them exactly what you think, but to take measures to disallow an adult from doing what they want is both illegal and, yes, controlling
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 06:57 PM
10

You wouldn't allow them to? You could probably have put that better my dude
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 06:31 PM
0

I can't say that most women here are sympathetic to men, but I can at least vouch that nobody's tried to round me up or corral me onto a train yet
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/20 08:03 PM
1

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/503492/
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/20 07:51 PM
3

You came in with a bevy of stats about how women are over represented in some specific types of murder (note: not murder overall), and so their problems are more serious. Thus implying they get the preferential treatment complained about. This isn't about perpetrator gender - and more women rape men than men, by the way, when you factor made to penetrate into it. Men need shelters from men just as much as from women, which is exactly my point. So why does it make sense for men to "protect their …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/20 12:06 PM
4

I'm not sure why, women have vast amounts of social power where men have physical. A man can be thrown in jail by a woman at the drop of a hat. The difference being you usually aren't arrested for emotional abuse (or any abuse, if you're a woman) where a man will be.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/20 11:08 AM
3

So you're saying yes, nobody gives a shit about mens issues because they're strong enough to take it. A perfect example of how society treats the men who raise their issues Women aren't just interested in women's DV shelters, the government is. Some of the biggest MRAs I know of are women, so avoid speaking for an entire gender. The problem is institutional- In the UK, there isn't any one single mens shelter for anything. There have been multiple cases of multiple men being thrown into the stree…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/20 11:04 AM
1

I dont think I agree, but interesting anyway. Roe v Wade was argued on the basis that disallowing abortion is unconstitutional because it would interfere with a woman's right to privacy - Nothing to do with bodily autonomy or labour. And that's also not the reason it isn't a punishment in law; it isn't a punishment in law because it isn't deliberately acted upon the mother in response to the mothers actions. Pregnancy is just the result of the parent's actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 07:03 AM
1

I don't understand a couple of points you raise 1.) Why are pregnancy and labour not part of the responsibilities attempted to be removed? They're certainly no benefit 2.) Are you arguing that abortion only occurs because of an unwillingness to go through pregnancy? I think not ending up with a kid is a more significant factor than you think 3.) Are you arguing that we allow abortion due to childbirth and labour? (Assuming you mean the US, I'm not American) - I thought the US abortion legality c…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 03:04 AM
3

Oh, I meant the majority of men can't just go on tinder and get dates Most men can get laid, if very rarely
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 01:55 PM
4

The majority of men absolutely cannot do that See how easy that was to debunk?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 10:10 AM
7

This is a very ironic comment
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 10:06 AM
4

Hypergamy is a practice, survival of the fittest is the reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 10:04 AM
1

Just as easily as you say "Bullshit" to him, he can say "bullshit" to you
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 10:00 AM
2

I think my biggest problem with this sub is an apparent eagerness for members of a group to represent a whole group, both in and of themselves and in the eyes of others The number of threads I see where RPers think a cast iron rule applies to ALL women and ALL men is mind boggling Likewise the number of threads I see where BPers think rules or trends NEVER apply because of a single outlier, or because it sounds too close to something negative, is also mind boggling
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 09:55 AM
12

They do dip in sometimes, at least, from my experience of every top 20% guy I've ever met
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 09:50 AM
1

You're jumping to a lot of conclusions to defend your anger. Yes, your comment makes you appear full of hate, the previous commenter is wrong but so are you. They blamed one group and you blamed another, and they did not post a large rant about the things men or women do (which the other sex also does) I think the answer you're looking for is that people do bad things, including men and single mothers, for many reasons, some of which are also incredibly tragic.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/20 08:38 AM
1

I'm surprised you took the time to write such an extensive list of the bad things some men do when everybody knows some people do bad things You seem very full of hate, and I wish you luck in healing from that
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/20 11:09 PM
2

I don't understand why you're so angry that people don't agree with you on the internet. Of course they dont. Why are you asking me 'why bother' when you're the one doing it? And tbh of course they're not gonna see your point when it's slathered in raging insults and condescension. If they have no idea what your point is, that's not their fault; it's yours for not explaining or arguing your stance well enough. A little bit of chill and zen goes a long way.
/r/MensRights26/02/20 02:23 PM
2

Just chiming in to let you know, it's probably not your argument that makes people down vote you. More that you got super pissy at a bit of sarcasm and went off when you could've boiled the whole thing down to "Those two things are apples and oranges" lmao
/r/MensRights26/02/20 06:00 AM
6

I'm not sure I'd agree, the number of young men working out has skyrocketed in the past few years. Most men agree that to be hot you need to spend a couple hours working hard 3 to 5 times a week, or have good genetics. Or both. I think most unattractive men have some factor preventing that; they dont want to, cant afford a membership, dont know how etc. But it's a give and take. Nobody thinks you're born with bulging pecs and a firm, shapely ass, but you are born to become 6'4 with a dreamy smil…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/20 09:27 AM
2

True, but that isnt the question. I'm sure any of us, including incels, would also or preferably wish for an equal society where unattractive men got dates The question is more whether a black person would've preferred to be born white in a highly racist society, and while I'm sure (and I'd hope) most were eventually happy being in and of themselves, I would imagine during times of racist hardship they would wish they could've been born under different racial circumstances too.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/20 09:19 AM
1

That's not what I was saying - more unattractive women than men marry, not more women That being said, more women do marry than men. Women are more likely than men to marry, to divorce, and to remarry. The same is true for reproduction. Today, for example, we have 1.5 time as many demale ancestors as male by mitochondrial DNA and non recombinant Y chromosome data
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/20 09:14 AM
2

Are you trying to argue that when black people were facing absolute systemic discrimination, had few human rights and lived drenched in absolute tragedy, they wouldn't have wanted to just be born white? Absolute lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/20 05:32 PM
1

If you approached any black person in the height racism in America with a magic potion that offered them whiteness, I see no world in which they wouldn't absolutely take that. Men want to be Chad because Chad has all the benefit and none of the negative, likewise black and white people during bygone eras I agree less with the scale obviously
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/20 11:27 AM
15

Women are much harsher in their mate selection than men tend to be, especially in the looks department. Most unattractive women will eventually find a guy willing to settle; beyond a certain point, far more unattractive men spend their lives alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/20 11:09 AM
8

What do you mean "dont acknowledge"? I'm not attracted to any of my female friends. If I were, it wouldn't be very easy to be friends with them
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/20 02:13 AM
1

You seem to have a pretty unfortunate view of men informed by shitty men in your life, I don't think that's true for many men though.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/20 09:43 AM
0

I'm not sure what exactly you mean? Toxic masculinity is a set of masculine behaviours now considered harmful to oneself or society. I dont think "fuck this shit" behaviour applies to that
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/20 10:29 AM
3

I think you can find sets of subreddits which, by and large, believe anything. A fair number are largely feminist, I'm sure, whilst a good number are anti feminist.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/20 10:26 AM
2

Not sure I'd agree - Anti feminist ideology has always seemed to me to work in similar ways In real life / on the 'open internet' (not sure what this is) I'd say most people are just well-meaning and apolitical, either the 'I'm a feminist because it just means equality right?' Or 'I treat people equally but I try to stay out of all the politics'
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/20 05:31 AM
20

Having just graduated from a fairly left wing UK university, I can safely say some cultures have been completely feminism based. Meaning political feminism, not vague equality. Terms like toxic masculinity were quite common. I think an an ideology it operates most effectively in closed cultures like universities, some online message boards, etc. which normal people may not be aware of
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/20 05:07 AM
2

I see your point, but I'd say my point still stands on negative sexism, in that while men seem to be falling over themselves to correct some disputable gender wage statistics, women in society (I speak only of the important movers and shakers, of course, as I did with men) don't spend time at all on male issues such as homelessness, circumcision and death rates As for your point, I agree but there's a line somewhere within that type of sexism where it ceases to be benevolent. Obviously when it c…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/20 12:03 AM
1

I'm not sure I'd agree men don't advocate against sexism which works in their favour, though I'm also not sure what you mean by benevolent sexism
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/20 05:20 PM
2

Yeah definitely, but I think the majority fall under the "would not disagree when confronted but otherwise don't really care" category. So while you'll often see pushes for men to be more open and communicative with their emotions (which is grand), you'll rarely see anybody pushing for an end to circumcision or an end to gender biases in criminal and family courts coming from women. That being said "women" here might just mean "mainstream society" so that's a distinction I would personally raise…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/20 11:02 AM
3

Right, but I don't understand why you believe that invalidates OP's argument that she, in this singular discussion, treats Depp's problems in the same way many women in society treat mens problems in general Edit: hand slipped and sent reply by accident
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/20 01:54 PM
7

How does that mean theres no distinction between treatment and talking about treatment? Couples counselling is an open discussion, I dont understand what meaning the context has in regards to OPs point.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/20 11:51 AM
8

One seems to me to be a very wide basis of action from how you talk to a person to whether you hold a door open to them, whilst the other is how you treat male issues in an open discussion. I dont understand why you believe there to be no meaningful distinction here
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/20 11:42 AM
19

So the distinction between two statements "Women tend to beat and abuse their partners" "Women tend to disregard and blame men for the problems they face" Is meaningless?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/20 11:17 AM
35

OPs point isnt that this is typical of how women treat men, but of how women respond to male issues
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/20 11:12 AM
2

Honestly, I also think a significant part is your family story. This seems to be something that's fallen by the wayside in Western cultures, but still exist in some. A while back a Scottish friend was explaining how his family comes from a clan which migrated from Ireland to Scotland and became banner men under a clan there, and worked to become one of them. All I really know about my own family is that my grandad moved to England from Wales
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/20 02:34 AM
14

So The View, a very popular daytime TV show, isn't indicative of popular opinion but a single post claiming blue balls are as bad as childbirth means men around the world share that opinion?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 11:04 AM
5

That's news to me, every unmarried childless woman beyond the age of 30 I know is low key depressed
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/20 09:35 AM
1

Oh, well that wasnt very clear lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/20 02:12 AM
1

I'm just assuming there are UK red pillers too
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/20 12:49 AM
1

"More" is kind of easy considering the insanely low number of virgins Not really sure which side I'd come down on but in my experience in churches in the UK nobody practices celibacy anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 09:15 AM
13

Nobody is suggesting what you are implying
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 09:08 AM
3

Grandiose how? Grandiosity is a sense of self superiority, most people have it to some degree, almost everybody have DT traits to some degree. People without some element of DT traits would be unconfident, overly emotional, boring and self loathing, full of self doubt. Somewhat unattractive. Does it make me a psychopath to say that? And I wasnt trying to convince you of that, I'm trying to say that it is not a positive example of glib charm for the purposes of the test. As I said before, the tes…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/20 09:49 PM
4

TRP seems to have some ASPD traits, to the extent that it aims to be logical, without emotion or inherently manipulative and self interested. But too many of these checklist points seem to be your interpretation, attempting to fit vague aspects of TRP thinking into the test. That isn't how the test was designed to, or should be, operated. Take for example your first few points. glib and superficial charm This one is fairly obvious. TRP teaches one that women are like children, and then attempt t…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/20 01:45 PM
3

Er, I'm sorry, I don't think you understand. Women are lovely. If women haven't been lovely to you in the past, have you stopped to consider that it was actually YOUR fault for besmirching her honour in some way? Men are such pigs.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/20 08:26 AM
0

Generally speaking, people are all impressed by impressive people but what factors are a requisite for sexual compatibility differ. Studies tend to show men favour appearance factors (youth, attractiveness) while women favour status factors (social status, economic status)
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/20 08:10 AM
4

I don't even disagree with the OP, but why is it dumb to believe that men and women, being different, have different social expectations?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/19 09:28 AM
2

Its certainly something worth bearing in mind, though perhaps more for the researchers. I think at a certain point you're looking at data that conflicts with your views and saying "Well, I think this data means the opposite of what it indicates, because a significant proportion are lying" A separate study to determine whether traditional men are more likely to lie might be worthwhile, but without one I would assume a study research with sufficient numbers of participants would make the risk of a…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/19 12:31 PM
4

If I had to put my finger on the point at which I disagree, I would say there are 2 things: 1.) You believe that men (en masse, as we're talking about society) view women as 'property' and that they only care about the women in their own lives as they are 'their property'. I'm not sure where this idea comes from, but in group bias is a very widely accepted thing. Of course men prefer women in their in group to women from an out group, but that has nothing to do with their being female. Secondly,…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 04:32 PM
2

I'm neither a woman nor a BP, but you've made a couple of mistakes I thought I'd point out to you because I sense some emotion behind your question. The first is that you're confusing expectation and things which make a woman attracted to you. No woman expects to be attracted to every man she meets, so please don't feel like you need to display your virtues to everybody you meet. That would be entirely counterproductive (it's not an attractive trait to 'try' to display them) As for women's actua…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/19 10:22 AM
3

I'm not sure your interpretation makes sense - If hypergamy is indeed some weird psychological ploy to avoid taking responsibility for failed relationships, why hypergamy? The implication of hypergamy is that the woman left him for the better option. The conclusion that the first wasnt good enough is already in the equation. I think, and this is only my personal opinion, the specific gripe RPers may have about hypergamy destroying relationships is that women will throw an option away once they'r…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/19 01:23 PM
1

I think OPs point was that in a Hollywood movie, everybody is the same level of highly attractive. No Hollywood movies tend to touch upon the plight of an unattractive, unsuccessful man, if only because they don't make good stories. The issue isnt that RPers aren't attractive, his issue is that he was told by women that attractiveness wasn't a significant factor when it is a very significant factor. To OP, the media itself was only at blame for the media's portrayal of men as universally attract…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/19 03:50 PM
1

I'm not sure what your point is? Are you saying its tin foil hat stuff to say the media tells stories in which the good guy wins in the end? Because I'm a scriptwriter, and I can tell you the protagonist almost always wins in the end. It's a matter of form and formula. I know to people who agree with you, who might be able to divine your meaning from snide comments, this might a good reply. But as somebody who doesn't really subscribe to either camp here, you come across unpleasantly. It's prett…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/19 02:23 PM
1

Not really part of the 'manosphere', but I tend to dislike tattoos on women. Dont dislike them all but here are some reasons why I think it's harder for women to find tattoos, and tattoo styles, which are unique and aesthetic and complementary to their personalities. IMO tats should fit all of those criteria so I tend to dislike tattoos on women which don't. I am also attracted to femininity in women, and find it hard to find tattoos which accentuate femininity. I don't know if it's a social cul…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/19 12:35 PM
1

I dont know what your point is, my point is that just as sexism assumes women are emotional, you are assuming pro lifers are emotional. Both are wrong. But you haven't responded to the killing babies thing, so I'll take that as an answer in it's own right I guess
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/19 09:54 AM
1

What emotions are you talking about? I didnt describe any emotions, or any feelings at all. I don't even know what you're arguing here - that pro lifers are just emotional and therefore shouldn't be relevant here? That same literal argument has been used about women, homosexuality, anything, for years. Feelings arise from opinion but dont invalidate them. So if 'what they think' is irrelevant because it affects you, am I right in saying you're A-OK with killing babies if you haven't given birth …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/19 09:20 PM
1

You're bemoaning inequality of nature, not of society. Women and girls are only "forced" to not kill their children because they are the ones who get pregnant. It's nothing to with their gender and role in society. Imagine a father of a 4 year old wanting to medically kill his daughter, because nobody should be forcing him to use his organs to work a job to support her. The mother doesn't consent, but she cannot consent for him to do this on her behalf. That's what pro life people see abortion a…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/19 10:40 AM
1

Why not? It seems to me you just want abortion legalized, which I agree with. So would you agree that abortion should be legalised, but should require the fathers consent? (Exception in cases of rape and threat to the life of the mother ofc)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/19 08:25 PM
1

Men have no abortion rights, as they have no say in whether abortions happen at all if legal, and some would prefer men have no say in the abortion debate at all. Is that not equal?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/19 08:12 PM
1

Okay, let me introduce you to the concept of argument. I have an opinion. I am pretty sure I am right about that opinion. If I thought I was wrong, I wouldn't hold that opinion. You have an opinion. You are pretty sure you are right about that opinion. Just stating "Well, I dont agree with your opinion because I CAN and so think about THAT" is about as valuable as me saying "No, I dont think women have any fewer rights than anybody else, so think about how that can be, and then come back to me" …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/19 06:54 PM
0

Well instead of simply dismissing my point with a single outlier in hundreds of states, countries and areas, why dont you tell me which rights women are not given and where?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/19 11:38 AM
1

I dont entirely agree with either of you, but you're both talking past each other because you both have entirely contradictory opinions and definitions of the terms you use. It would be interesting to hear your thoughts on what feminism actually is. I suspect, as many mainstream feminists who do not form part of the so called 'far left' or more 'extreme' feminist groups, Orange_Paisley sees feminism as mere advocacy for the equality of the sexes. This is somewhat accurate for most feminists, but…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/19 11:04 PM
0

You can find endless guides just googling "how to take a good tinder picture"
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/19 02:25 PM
1

Sure, it's their fault for not seeing the red flags in these cases. But these cases are all incredibly obvious. What about cases where a guy goes after the right girl, only for her to decide she's bored of being good? What about a guy who dates the wrong girl, who seems genuinely remorseful about her past behaviour and has made concerted efforts to change herself? Like I get that to a certain extent you need to be selective about who you date, but when hormones are flying and a guy is lonely, or…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/19 11:01 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter