~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Anyone else think "for women" should be dropped from the description? It's not a fight for equality if its FOR one or the other.Men never had complete responsibility for providing for their family. Men had the financial responsibility, or the equivalent of that. Women did all the care taking, including making meals, making clothes, everything. Men got custody of the children only because children were considered property and not because they did most of the care giving. You sound like someone who is not in to equal rights but rather think men should be in control. If a person, whether it be man or woman, does most of the… | /r/MensRights | 01/04/19 06:12 PM |
| 2 | Anyone else think "for women" should be dropped from the description? It's not a fight for equality if its FOR one or the other.No..only if their opinion were that women are only good for their vaginas or are meant to look pretty. My dad was simply not like that and neither was my grandpa. My grandpa was a very honorable person. | /r/MensRights | 31/03/19 05:19 PM |
| 2 | Anyone else think "for women" should be dropped from the description? It's not a fight for equality if its FOR one or the other.My mom was an engineer in the 60's. I heard plenty from her. I did not take much seriously until I met my inlaws, who are pigs. I have only rarely had an equality problem and since I have seven sons, I have seen them attacked for being male than I have ever been attacked myself. I have watched my daughter feel she has the right to stomp on men. I am an anti-feminist, but I still believe in equality. I used to underestimate what my mother went through. After her death, I have looked much more clo… | /r/MensRights | 31/03/19 05:15 PM |
| -4 | Anyone else think "for women" should be dropped from the description? It's not a fight for equality if its FOR one or the other.Not exactly. That term comes with a whole political agenda and feminists try to claim to be a part of it. | /r/MensRights | 31/03/19 02:24 AM |
| -7 | Anyone else think "for women" should be dropped from the description? It's not a fight for equality if its FOR one or the other.This Danny Duchamp? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3QgvIn0rzo He was not around in the 50's or 60's so I cannot take him seriously...well..based on his youtube video I cannot take him seriously either. But he is far from an expert on feminism 50+ years ago. Ditto for Karen..... http://owningyourshit.blogspot.com Have you watched Madmen? | /r/MensRights | 31/03/19 01:39 AM |
| 24 | Anyone else think "for women" should be dropped from the description? It's not a fight for equality if its FOR one or the other.It used to be a fight for equality. Now it is for supremacy. Those who identify as feminist these days rarely want their rights to be equal to men. | /r/MensRights | 30/03/19 11:30 PM |
| 61 | Anyone else think "for women" should be dropped from the description? It's not a fight for equality if its FOR one or the other.They are not Equalists, they are feminists. They are for feminine power, not equality. I am an equalist. | /r/MensRights | 30/03/19 11:29 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter