UglyNeckBeard Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Radfem accuses Ally Fogg of 'celebrating his penis at the expense of the child victim of rape in the Max Clifford rape trial' I don't know if Ally Fogg can really be considered an MRA blogger though. Most MRA's I know don't have the best things to say about him – certainly AVFM has nothing good to say about the man: http://www.avoiceformen.com/misandry/sycophants/ally-fogg-goes-native/ http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/ally-foggs-pants-are-on-fire/ ect... The first article linked above says "Ally Fogg is not a feminist, allegedly. But maybe he is worse than that." Going by your framework I think this thread is more …	/r/MensRights	23/03/14 07:41 PM
4	Chivalry gone wrong? My experience at a fancy restaurant Should have only put down enough money to cover the meal and 75% of the 10% automatic gratuity and wrote that in his concern for the ladies he could take the pay cut necessary to mitigate the (fictional) wage gap.	/r/MensRights	23/03/14 07:24 PM
1	Remember when feminists pledged to fix wikipedia because it was "very masculine" and were having a "mass edit wikipedia day"? Look what I found in the otherwise completely scientific article about Fertilization I see that it makes sense. Its sort of a booster shot for the perception of legitimacy by relying on the fact that people do judge proverbial books by their covers.	/r/MensRights	23/03/14 12:27 AM
1	Remember when feminists pledged to fix wikipedia because it was "very masculine" and were having a "mass edit wikipedia day"? Look what I found in the otherwise completely scientific article about Fertilization oooohhhh. Yah you are right I didn't know about the Ancient Astronaut theorists. I was assuming ancient astronomers and not modern nut-jobs' on ancient happenings. My bad. That given then yes I now do agree with your initial comparison.	/r/MensRights	23/03/14 12:09 AM
2	Remember when feminists pledged to fix wikipedia because it was "very masculine" and were having a "mass edit wikipedia day"? Look what I found in the otherwise completely scientific article about Fertilization Which is why, of the many wonderful pieces you have written, I love "The One Good Man." Your story in the above post is the tale of your confrontation and battle with him, only to find that he can not be slain with logic; like a ghost, he and his arguments lack substance and thus cannot be struck down.	/r/MensRights	17/03/14 11:39 PM
3	Remember when feminists pledged to fix wikipedia because it was "very masculine" and were having a "mass edit wikipedia day"? Look what I found in the otherwise completely scientific article about Fertilization Pretty much, though interestingly enough female orgasm releases fluids that at least help deal with some of the acid. Admittedly its not really a helping hand so much as savagery turned down from 11.	/r/MensRights	17/03/14 11:37 PM
1	Remember when feminists pledged to fix wikipedia because it was "very masculine" and were having a "mass edit wikipedia day"? Look what I found in the otherwise completely scientific article about Fertilization Yes, Poe's Law in effect. AMR can criticize all they like, when people trying to interpret you are falling victim of Poe's law it is less a problem with your critics and more time for serious introspection.	/r/MensRights	17/03/14 11:35 PM
2	Remember when feminists pledged to fix wikipedia because it was "very masculine" and were having a "mass edit wikipedia day"? Look what I found in the otherwise completely scientific article about Fertilization It's on par with any saying "However, Ancient Astronaut theorists suggest" I don't know, I think you are being a little unfair to the Ancient Astronaut theorists. I mean seriously, a lot of crazy old science makes sense given the limited understanding universe at the time. Sure it is irrelevant now, but at one point it was a logical hypothesis within the realms of serious thought and is thus historically significant thinking (so long as it is flagged as exactly that and not some sort of counter …	/r/MensRights	17/03/14 11:32 PM
0	Thank you Facebook Its not about revenge. It is not about inflicting pain. It is about showing people why doing something is wrong the only way narcissist can understand anything, by when it happens to themselves. It is about MAD as I said above, not revenge. The US was the first to get nuclear weapons and after it did it dropped them freely on Japan for what was left of the war when it was the only player with them. Then other major powers got nuclear weapons, so MAD went into effect and since then everyone has b…	/r/MensRights	17/03/14 11:24 AM
1	Thank you Facebook That is a good point that I can get behind.	/r/MensRights	17/03/14 11:17 AM
1	Thank you Facebook I see what you are saying. But it isn't about revenge so much as it is about, these people will never understand why it is wrong, until they have tasted the other end. Then the healing can begin. I do respect your stance on this, and certainly if it was motivated by vengeance I would agree at the loss of moral high ground. But my, and others, stance is motivated simply to educating the oponent through the only thing that truly teaches, experience. It is a little like MAD. As sick, twisted, scary…	/r/MensRights	16/03/14 02:45 AM
1	Thank you Facebook I am generally against all censorship too, but my willingness to fight fire with fire in specific cases actually trumps that a little bit. My logic is thus: cases like facebook censorship were set up as a special tool silence MRM and related descent by a bunch of feminists. (We don't know the details but everything surrounding its initial push was by feminists claiming that if they weren't given power to silence in FB, rapists and the like would take over the place) They have been using their ha…	/r/MensRights	16/03/14 02:20 AM
2	Chemists call for boycott over all-male speaker line up "If you don't have women speaking in our field, we will make sure we sabotage our own careers by not attending!" Yah I noticed that too: One of us began boycotting such conferences 14 years ago and can’t believe that 14 years later we are still seeing such overt discrimination. i.e. "we started boycotting this event 14 years ago, and now they aren't inviting us any more! THE NERVE! THE PATRIARCHY!"	/r/MensRights	19/02/14 10:41 PM
2	Washington Post Op-Ed: Asking Candidates and having Star Trek posters on the wall is Oppressive to Women. He is a feminist, clear observation and rational thinking are not necessarily his forte.	/r/MensRights	18/02/14 12:35 PM
1	Is Patriarchy a Conspiracy Theory? Podcast W/ 'Bleeding Heart' Libertarian Sarah Skwire Perhaps it is a feminist who thinks it takes too much effort to actually make laws to abuse men and force them to do things for women, and is hoping to change society so that men will just do that on their own with only a little yelling and shaming for "encouragement?"	/r/MensRights	17/02/14 07:59 PM
2	Washington Post Op-Ed: Asking Candidates and having Star Trek posters on the wall is Oppressive to Women. But does HE know that?	/r/MensRights	17/02/14 07:31 PM
8	60 Minutes admits feminism has stifled scientific research which is now showing the genders are very different on a cellular level. Its like the Sun, your not supposed to look directly at it.	/r/MensRights	17/02/14 07:11 PM
2	MGTOW and sex drive What's the medication???? I want it!! Seconded, that sounds like that "side-effect" is a cure in and of its self.	/r/MGTOW	14/02/14 12:37 AM
1	In the end, porn doesn't whet men's appetites—it turns them off the real thing Kind of like my thought on the matter too. Okay, sure Naomi more men are turning to porn then women, but which came first here, the chicken or the egg? Did men just turn to porn and ditch women, or did women (on average) become so awful that men were forced to ditch them and turn to porn? I think her correlation of the situation is correct, but her assessment of causality is reversed.	/r/MGTOW	14/02/14 12:26 AM
1	My facebook friend shared this photo. She didn't understand why it was so offensive. Could be. I haven't looked directly at the primary lit for this, only the secondary lit which mentioned a few things in passing. I would have to do some digging and reading before I could comment any further with increasing the amount of speculation I have already posted.	/r/MensRights	01/02/14 11:19 PM
1	Ex wife taking my SO to court without a summons... I feel something fishy going on No the sky isn't falling but it is part of the little bits that chew away at things. The good we do on the subreddit itself is the useful posts we make. Posts are useful in proportion to their useful content, such as spreading awareness of critical items of note, times the number of people who see them with a huge weighting factor for the value of the multiplicand for posts that are in interaction with people outside of the community – as those are the posts with traveling weight. Therefore hara…	/r/MensRights	30/01/14 05:58 PM
0	Ex wife taking my SO to court without a summons... I feel something fishy going on How do you think she knew to come here to begin with? Because this appears to a problem with bias against males, so they went to a forum where that is supposed to be addressed?	/r/MensRights	30/01/14 05:42 PM
2	Ex wife taking my SO to court without a summons... I feel something fishy going on Leading questions, those look exactly like the type of "questions" you see SRSers ask MRAs and like.	/r/MensRights	30/01/14 05:13 PM
1	Ex wife taking my SO to court without a summons... I feel something fishy going on Many people (including women) simply don't know until they are brutally struck by how corrupt the system has become. I simply didn't know until I was struck by it. Being angry at people who don't know until after the fact and then blaming them for complicity with the systems corruption when they were simply ignorant is condemning people for lacking a godlike power of omniscience. I find that unfair and unreasonable and I don't think I am the only one who thinks that way. You are right there are …	/r/MensRights	30/01/14 05:12 PM
1	Ex wife taking my SO to court without a summons... I feel something fishy going on If it appears that someone is coming here in good graces for legitimate help and are getting attacked for it, that generally doesn't look good, and word will slowly get out.	/r/MensRights	30/01/14 04:56 PM
1	Ex wife taking my SO to court without a summons... I feel something fishy going on Those were two pretty aggressive and leading questions. I don't think I would have answered questions like that either if confronted with them. That isn't suspicious behavior, it is just rational behavior. I understand that you are very angry at women. I have a laundry list of outrageous things that some of them have done to me too, but again there is no "payback" unless there is evidence that this is a person responsible for the specific problem, else you are just attacking an innocent. You nee…	/r/MensRights	30/01/14 04:21 PM
0	Ex wife taking my SO to court without a summons... I feel something fishy going on Please do not confuse hate with my lack of empathy for women who now complain that everything they previously fought for has caused their current issues they take exception to. Forgive my ignorance but does this occur in her post history or something? (I haven't checked I am legitimately curious.) Because if there isn't evidence that she specifically advocates and supports the systemic bias and corruption that has come to hurt her S.O., herself, and their family then you are just attacking her f…	/r/MensRights	30/01/14 04:13 PM
1	My facebook friend shared this photo. She didn't understand why it was so offensive. I also think I have heard that there may be ways to fuse the "confused" haploid cells with an egg directly and with the right chemical and enzymatic induction get artificial fertilization. In the end the sperm is only required to: 1) actually be able to find and get to that reclusive egg all the way in there 2) deliver a haploid nucleus to target 3) provide some enzymes and chemical that tell everyone it is "go time". As such it is definitely theoretically possible to just take a "confused" non-…	/r/MensRights	30/01/14 11:54 AM
1	My facebook friend shared this photo. She didn't understand why it was so offensive. I have heard no. I don't know exactly the reason, but I think you can induce mieosis to produce just a haploid cell (it is neither sperm nor egg, just a confused haploid cell with potential reproductive capabilites), and then take a sperm from any mammal and swap the sperm's nucleus out for that of the haploid cell using micro injection techniques. There may be other ways as well.	/r/MensRights	30/01/14 11:48 AM
1	Feminists fight against rape culture I certainly wouldn't say women in general, but I have seen a non trivial number of feminists say things along the lines of "its a good thing because it will make these men and those close to them reflect on how all women feel" – and take a non-small amount of pleasure while saying so.	/r/MensRights	29/01/14 07:43 PM
1	My facebook friend shared this photo. She didn't understand why it was so offensive. Not directly, no but there have been papers coming out in the scientific literature of getting pluripotent cells to differentiate and then undergo meiosis to produce sperm. I don't know if there are papers obtaining or creating pluripotent cells (and then viable sperm) from bone marrow, but if that exact technology isn't available right now, it will be shortly I can guarantee you.	/r/MensRights	29/01/14 07:32 PM
2	I'm A Submissive Woman: What's Wrong With That? - Family "women that choose to take on a traditional gender role" Yah that is the only term that makes sense for this to me so far. This, of course can be shorted to the more manageable "traditionalist" as need be to cut down on verbosity.	/r/MensRights	29/01/14 12:43 AM
1	As a woman that just found this subreddit. As has been said above, "You're the best kind of person." There are so many "humanitarians" out there, and most of them may actually mean well (many do not), but the true humanitarians are the ones who willingly choose to assist on the really unpopular and socially stigmatized issues, like Mens Rights are currently, and do so at personal cost (and sadly in a feminist run society any woman who refuses to "tow the party line" pays a cost – you risk getting feminism mighty pimp hand: http://tinyurl…	/r/MensRights	29/01/14 12:08 AM
5	Question from a Feminist. Do you MensRights members support this disgusting Smartphone App? On the other hand, labelling and harassing women could lead to violence. Ah open sexism in your first reply. Basically while Lulu is bad this is worse simply because men are involved. Yes in all the same situations as women we men are just going to degenerate into rape and violence because goodness knows we just can't help ourselves. If it were only wonderful enlightened lesbians using this App it would be perfectly safe and Okay. But sadly many of the people who might use this app happen to hav…	/r/MensRights	28/01/14 01:42 AM