TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Ulfhedin Archive

View 0 posts and 16 comments by Ulfhedin on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

I second this motion.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 06:03 AM
2

The second line clearly indicates that the first was sarcasm... and you sound like a douche. Not knowing what military apologist means (or bothering to look it up on Google) = idiot.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 12:09 AM
1

Look up Dan Hardy and california gaming commision.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 09:24 PM
3

Ya, so a guy with a 'wolf heart' can't fight in the UFC due to 'unfair advantage', but a guy who threw some tits on his chest can fight vs women? WTF...
/r/MensRights06/04/13 04:31 AM
0

I don't like beets, but I still believe that people have the right to eat beets and I support legislation that makes beet eating on par with all other forms of food consumption. It makes me feel icky when I see people eat beets, but I keep that preference to myself and do not think anyone else should be influenced by my subconcious hangups. That does not make me prejudice vs beet eaters. You are a fool, an ignorant prejudice fool.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 07:31 PM
1

Being a bigot is a concious act. If it makes you feel a bit icky inside when you see two men making out, that isn't you being a bigot. If you then take that icky feeling and attack the men or think they are somehow lesser then you, or that they are doing something wrong because it makes you feel icky, THAT is being a bigot. If you act on your subconscious hangups and don't recognise them for what they are, that is bigotry. Not going to a male MT because you feel uncomfortable is not being a bigo…
/r/MensRights05/04/13 07:28 PM
3

Thank you, that was very informative. So, “speaking over” has directly to do with lived experience and when talking about subjective experience. How do you distinguish between people lying (or embellishing) to gain political capital (playing the victim) and genuine lived experience? The main reason I bring this up is that, it is hard to question evidence to determine veracity of information if you are constantly concerned about emotional responses. Questioning is central to science. Resolution? …
/r/MensRights26/03/13 11:51 PM
3

Most useful posts I’ve read in a long time. What do you mean by “speak over?”
/r/MensRights26/03/13 10:07 PM
2

Aren't they?
/r/MensRights21/03/13 07:02 PM
1

Because race doesn't exist in any scientifically acceptable fashion... and it isn't okay to do what these insurance companies are doing, a lot of other states/countries/nations have gotten rid of this.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 03:41 AM
5

It isn't the same person... and all your attitude does is make everyone else think you are an idiot. We (MRA’s), unlike the feminists, should be able to separate our feelings from our arguments, so stop acting like a feminist and show some class. Another point, not all of us are user/pay advocates, nor conservative fauxtards, so don’t act like a feminist and generalize beyond reason. If you had just stated your argument calmly with some semblance of manners, you would have achieved your rhetoric…
/r/MensRights14/03/13 03:39 AM
2

Now I don't feel so bad...
/r/MensRights14/03/13 03:26 AM
1

That is probably what the jews said about the Nazi party before it took power...
/r/MensRights13/03/13 04:09 AM
1

... Their testimony would be biased due to them not being presented with a selection of possible doers. Eyewitness testimony is proven, by science, to be super unreliable. So posting a person’s photo as a rape suspect could actually have the effect of an innocent person being charged with multiple crimes they did not commit.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 02:18 AM
1

Alternately, we could have one movement called Ulfhedin's Movement (arbitrary) which encompasses all things I (also arbitrary) espouse (which might be problematic because I (arbitrary) read too much and therefore my views change a lot (microcosm of literate society)), this movement would replace all other movements and would work at tearing down the entire corrupt structure of current society and building a new 'NoPlace' in its stead, which is the closest we could come to perfection. Within this…
/r/MensRights07/02/13 05:57 AM
2

I don't think you understand Feminism. The core of Feminism is Patriarchy theory. You are not the same as a feminist unless you buy Patriarchy theory, “and all its ugly little step-children” (don't remember who said this but it's not a Ulfhedin original), such as rape culture, etc. You are also committing the naturalistic fallacy (look it up), by saying we are naturally the same, therefore we should be the same. Let me preface this by saying that, yes, I do believe in equality of opportunity, eq…
/r/MensRights07/02/13 05:44 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter