TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Ultraideal848 Archive

View 0 posts and 160 comments by Ultraideal848 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

On reddit? What about the real life, hating men and having double standarts against them is a norm everywhere.
/r/MensRights23/07/26 12:13 PM
1

At the same time would you want a boy to go through having a disgusting parent like that.
/r/MensRights23/07/26 12:11 PM
7

Meritocracy is a property of the entire business marketplace, NOT one company and its hiring processes. You keep insisting on logical fallacy in order to maintain your argument. A lib calling everything property lol. Again though, you keep coming up with random scenarios where a corporation discriminating against men actually magically creates equality. While the reality is that you would be ok with one company doing it an you would also be ok with all the companies doing it. Your only response …
/r/MensRights19/01/26 12:38 PM
5

Not sure what you are referring to. Do you mean things like voting? Because just by the fact of them existing, their opinions have more impact on society than anyone else's. Either way, I think you are overestimating the number of people who function differently, including yourself. I don't mean it in a negative sense, but you have to be a borderline psychopath for your opinions to be completely different from your environment and the people around you. You can't just dismiss the power media has…
/r/MensRights19/01/26 12:22 PM
10

Meritocracy can only happen if employers are free to hire who they want You clearly don't care about whether people are hired based on merit or not, so I don't understand why you keep abusing the word. Corporations being "free" to hire women only isn't meritocracy. You call others stupid, yet you can't seem to comprehend basic definitions of words or have the ability to engage with simple arguments without devolving to personal attacks and deflection. men did fantastic before DEI We weren't argu…
/r/MensRights19/01/26 12:04 PM
5

You do, but unfortunately the majority of the people will always just choose to conform to their environment. It's just human nature.
/r/MensRights19/01/26 11:52 AM
8

Strawman. All workers have equal rights once hired and not hiring you is not treating you like a second class citizen when you can start your own company or work for someone else. You can argue about word semantics and define these words however you want. Doesn't refute any of my claims. You just justified men being barred from jobs just because of their gender with "they can start their own business if they want". merit is the only fair way It is, and you just stated that you don't care about i…
/r/MensRights19/01/26 11:49 AM
7

Looks like it will be cheered on by most people everywhere. That's what happens when 5 billionaires own all media and politicians.
/r/MensRights19/01/26 11:21 AM
8

To a libertarian, it doesn't matter whether they "die fast" or not. Just as you just said, they think that corporations have a right to treat men as second class citizens if they so choose to. Pretending like libertarianism is the answer, let alone the only answer to anyone's issues other than that of billionaire corporation owners like Bazos, is just disingenuous. Libertarianism is the modern billionaire's version of the divine rights of kings. Where medieval kings were telling peasants that th…
/r/MensRights19/01/26 11:19 AM
4

This guy is the actual libertarian who is being honest. If some corpo thinks that it's a good idea to fuck over men and only hire women they have no problems with it. They just want corporations to replace what the government is doing. They could care less about men.
/r/MensRights19/01/26 10:48 AM
14

Your choice is an illusion. The only way I see to get out of this is to support Libertarians because they want to reduce the size and power of government. Only government? As if something would stop corporations from abusing men the same exact way. A Libertarian would say that corporations have a right to discriminate against men and only hire women if they themselves choose to. Libertarians only care about protecting the "freedom" of these transnational corporations to do anything they want. Th…
/r/MensRights19/01/26 10:44 AM
9

It seems like no matter who they vote for, in the current system, the workers money will be stolen and given to people who don't actually earn the money themselves.
/r/MensRights19/01/26 10:37 AM
6

Plenty of "woke" and feminist women will spew the same exact traditional family propaganda with different words Because telling men that spending all their money on their wife while she sits at home is "manly and traditional" is benifitial to women. So is men being told to take pride in being government cannon fodder and to accept conscription. It's the same with all popular political sides. They are all manufactured propaganda tools to get us to die for the people that rule over us. And portray…
/r/MensRights19/01/26 10:34 AM
1

I don't even know how you are using the word conservative anymore. What's more conservative than serving a king? The word liberal back then just described people who supported capitalism and republics over feudalism and absolute monarchies more than their social values. Conservatives today would be considered as liberals back then. Either way, the masses were always being slaughtered by the ruling class regardless of what political views they had.
/r/MensRights19/01/26 04:45 AM
8

"Conservative men are slaughtered "? What does that even mean? You think that only conservative men suffer in our society or that all men are conservative? I would agree with one thing, men have always suffered and been treated as second class citizens. Including when conservatism was more dominant. Most conservative social values favor women.
/r/MensRights18/01/26 05:11 PM
23

I think what she is saying is that if someone from the X group of people does something, then the X group of people is responsible for that thing. It's blatant tribalism. This type of dehumanization of people into immutable characteristics is very common in many murderous ideologies.
/r/MensRights13/01/26 10:23 AM
25

I mean, historically, hundreds of millions, if not billions, of men have been forcibly sent to wars and murdered. And these women defend and vote for conscription and wars to this day because they don't have to deal with the consequences. When a woman physically assaults a man, it's not even seen as bad, and when they murder a man, they receive no or significantly lesser punishments. These women definitely would not "start caring about misandry" if more men started being murdered by women. They …
/r/MensRights13/01/26 10:15 AM
7

It's funny to see these people make the same exact arguments as the ultra nationalist racists.
/r/MensRights13/01/26 10:02 AM
9

Don't think tribalism is century specific thing. I think it explains the history of human society. Although if these women were born in the early 20th century, they would definitely support Hitler.
/r/MensRights13/01/26 09:43 AM
2

Almost everybody watches porn, and almost all of those people are normal and not violent. Most serial killers have a porn addiction as well. Watching porn is a slippery slope into real-life violent behavior. If Ted Bundy also ate fast food, would we argue that eating fast food is a slippery slope to real-life violent behavior? Someone who isn't already mentally ill won't become a serial killer from looking at videos of people fucking. Are you also against violent movies and TV shows? Because alt…
/r/MensRights01/01/26 05:25 AM
2

They don't have consription to avoid wars, that is true, just like I don't have a lock on my door to avoid thefts, but to deter them. Or a fire extinguisher, which I don't have, but if I would, it wouldn't be to avoid fires, but to... well, extinguish them. You don't seem to have understood the argument I was making, which makes sense considering you didn't read what I wrote. TLDR of what I said would be that, in my opinion, the people who decide to start wars control both sides and make money f…
/r/MensRights30/12/25 08:27 AM
5

Yeah, generally I think that all popular political "sides" right now are really just on the side of their billionaire donors. The rest of the stuff they pretend to care about are just social issues they abuse to divide people and get them to focus on anything but the real cause of our problems.
/r/MensRights29/12/25 04:48 PM
5

No, I am not going to pick apart every point Exactly. Although you haven't picked apart a single point. You respond with the same exact emotional and pointless text fifteen times, and when called out, say that you don't have enough time. It's clearly not about time. Ironically, as you call others uneducated, you haven't even bothered to learn about or understand the religion you supposedly follow and the points they make. If I had to recommend one thing to deconvert people from religion, it woul…
/r/MensRights29/12/25 04:14 PM
4

You are arguing against positions that I do not hold, so how am I supposed to engage with you? Can you quote the exact things I have said and explain how they are misrepresenting your points instead of speaking in vague generalities like you people love to do? You have mostly just described your negative experiences with Christianity and complained that I’m just like the people who you seem to have been harmed by. I made an argument against your points, and once you accused me of "not understand…
/r/MensRights29/12/25 03:56 PM
3

Nice. You have destroyed me with facts and logic. I love billionaires wars now.
/r/MensRights29/12/25 03:41 PM
7

I think I wrote that long ass response for nothing. Most countries don't have the financial power Again, what does "countries" even mean? The wealthy elite and billionaires who actually own all nations have more than enough money. Either way, it doesn't matter whether they have enough money or not. Why would these billionaires spend their valuable wealth on soldiers when they can just enslave them for free? They wouldn't. The wealthy elites of the ruling class don't consider the average person h…
/r/MensRights29/12/25 03:27 PM
3

I always try to preempt these comments, but people seem to have an irresistible urge to argue with the ghosts in their head any time Christ is mentioned. Brother, originally you didn't even mention Christ at all. I was the one who pointed out your extremely moralistic language as a way a religious person would talk, and I was right. You just tried to disguise your proselytizing as "caring about men". I have had to listen to people like you my whole life. Most people where I live are ultra conser…
/r/MensRights29/12/25 03:13 PM
-1

I am an ultra-conservative Christian Just as I said. If your concept of what ultra-conservative Christianity is comes from Protestantism or Roman Catholicism I grew up in an Orthodox Christian family, but either way I don't think any of the major Christian denominations or even religions have a significantly different view on the sinfulness of looking at boobs online. I am not moralizing to any degree whatsoever You clearly are. How could a Christian not? It would be going against your beliefs. …
/r/MensRights29/12/25 02:22 PM
8

Porn is probably one of the most negative forces affecting young men today. This only makes sense if you are an ultra conservative Christian and think that watching porn is one of the worst sins someone can commit. Which most people who are deluded into thinking that porn is the number one issue in our society and a cause of all our problems are. I could list a billion things that are a billion times more of a negative force on people than watching porn. Drugs, alcohol, smoking, gambling, even j…
/r/MensRights29/12/25 01:49 PM
9

One might sound nicer, but that only makes it more insidious. Functionally, both ideologies have the exact same result of enslaving men.
/r/MensRights29/12/25 01:35 PM
6

"fuck this shit, war is stupid, we don't want war so we will dissolve our army" You are conflating not having conscription with not having an army at all. The reason we have conscription is that not paying soldiers and enslaving men instead is cheaper. Even disregarding wars, in many countries men are forced into mandatory unpaid military service. and the ukrainan men just said "fuck it, I guess we're russians now". You think they would say that if there was no conscription? Even if they did, sh…
/r/MensRights29/12/25 09:04 AM
37

It makes sense why individuals comply with it. No one wants to be arrested or executed by cops. But the laws can be changed. If the majority of men wanted to, we have the power to end conscription. But the sad reality is that from birth, we get indoctrinated into thinking that it's somehow “manly” or virtuous to be government cannon fodder. Even when men get murdered or forced into unpaid labor by ”their own” nation, they accept it because we are told that these wars and conscription are meant t…
/r/MensRights28/12/25 02:10 PM
1

Considering how traditional values gets portrayed as an ideology that benefits men over women, you would be surprised how often being conservative and traditional suits their needs.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/12/25 02:58 PM
10

This is what happens when you start ranking how valuable people's lives are based on their gender. It's not just feelings. They will leave men and boys to die to save women's lives in any situation. These people are pure evil.
/r/MensRights09/12/25 10:06 AM
28

There is no one more conservative than an average feminist when it allows them to attack men.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/12/25 04:45 PM
26

Only one of those is seen as socially acceptable and "funny" while the other is seen as one of the worst things someone can do.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/12/25 04:42 PM
4

When men get oppressed they call it our "duty"
/r/MensRights02/12/25 03:43 AM
9

Feminists only want equality inequality when it benefits them.
/r/MensRights02/12/25 03:42 AM
26

I think even the idea that women are any less right wing is propaganda, though. I think the exact same amount of women hate minorities while almost all of them hate men.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/11/25 11:14 AM
24

To be fair, it's not like these people actually care. They just want to virtue signal, but if you can't tell, they obviously don't care about other human beings. They will happily flock to the right too after a while, and they will fit right in.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/11/25 11:07 AM
1

You just were. The other guy would probably say the same thing.
/r/MensRights25/11/25 01:58 AM
1

Genocide defending type.
/r/MensRights25/11/25 01:52 AM
1

Both of you are the same type of ppl.
/r/MensRights25/11/25 01:44 AM
1

Tell who?
/r/MensRights24/11/25 03:55 PM
1

What? What? Female supremacism shares many ideals with the right and conservatives. It has nothing to do with the ideology that promotes actual equality and puts class above all else.
/r/MensRights24/11/25 03:41 PM
0

Your comments keep getting auto deleted probably because you can't stop using the n word. The fact is that the communists ended the famines that were historically plaguing the Russian Empire since the aristocrats were stealing all the food the serfs produced. Yet liberals fetishize monarchist Russia. How are the human rights in capitalist Sudan, India, or US funded Saudi Arabia? Selective mention of capitalist nations is hilarious. What human rights were there in Russia before communism? Workers…
/r/MensRights24/11/25 02:44 PM
0

No response to the actual facts. Just emotional feminazi drivel and braindead Red Scare propaganda one liners.
/r/MensRights24/11/25 02:18 PM
0

Lol wut, you are just cutting out quotes without context. What Marx and Engels wrote is completely antithetical to feminism. They advocated for actual equality, unlike feminism and female supremacy, which puts gender above class and puts billionaire women, above working class men.
/r/MensRights24/11/25 01:40 PM
2

Feminism seems to be very efficient at creating genocide defenders. Makes sense why the corpos promote it.
/r/MensRights24/11/25 01:33 PM
0

Trad rightoids when they push the idea that women should get treated like children for thousands of years. "It's ComMUniSMs FaULt"
/r/MensRights24/11/25 01:30 PM
16

They would hate reverse gendered version of this. Reading this is almost comical to me because at this point it is like saying the Nazis would hate the reverse race version of what they're doing. Of course they would. They know it, and they don't care. These people are pure evil.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/11/25 12:53 PM
2

Just deflection without answering most of my points. men aren't tortured to death daily for their gender Tell that to all the Ukrainian men while the Ukrainian women are free to run over to a different country or sit at home. women are also tortured to death and graped in parts of the world like south africa or the congo So are men? Except in one scenario, it's not a state mandated socially acceptable phenomenon that the vast majority of women in EVERY part of the world vote for. How is even a y…
/r/MensRights24/11/25 12:24 PM
-1

Are you regarded? When did I say that it was the men's fault?
/r/MensRights24/11/25 12:13 PM
2

let alone only women I was being a little pedantic since liberal womens defense of conscription is usually "mEN sTArt WaRs", but women can and do vote for conscription and pro war governments. in western europe there are no wars to be conscripted into I guess Ukraine doesn't count since it isn't West enough. Either way, the current amount of wars in this one specific region of the world you like doesn't erase the billions of men that were, will be, and are currently being tortured to death just …
/r/MensRights24/11/25 12:10 PM
2

do you think that should be how it is? Men still get forcibly conscripted and genocided every time women vote for another war, to this day, yet people call this system patriarchy. it’s not better to be a women during that time, genuinely ridiculous Tell that to the men that were sent to literal hell while women sat at home.
/r/MensRights24/11/25 11:59 AM
-1

Women never was oppressed, when women had less rights - they had much less obligations. They still have much less obligations while they have way more privileges than men. Thanks to our billionaire overlords. communist killed 1\3 of my nation with hunger Communists suffered the last famine and ended them, while the monarchists and then liberals profited off them for thousands of years. to maintain "industrialization" in USSR. Why don't you care about billions that were intentionally murdered by …
/r/MensRights24/11/25 11:56 AM
2

I don't remember the last time I heard a billionaire lib not beg for government intervention when it came to getting subsidized and bailed out by the taxes they stole from the workers. It's these massive corporations and billionaire owned media that have been shoving these men hating ideologies down our throats. Because they thrive off of hate and division among the workers. Some Christians might believe that they are oppressed by the non Christians, but that wouldn't make them communist.
/r/MensRights24/11/25 11:43 AM
4

A feminist considers a billionaire woman more oppressed than some guy working 12 hours a day barely earning a living just because they are a man. Feminists like to disguise their female supremacy as a push for equality, that is why some of them like to leech from ideologies like communism. It is very silly to me to equate Marxism, an ideology that puts class above all else, with these female supremacists just because they both consider some people oppressed. Every single ideology considers their…
/r/MensRights24/11/25 11:34 AM
0

Sadly, it seems like there are a lot of billionaire worshipping fascists around here.
/r/MensRights24/11/25 11:28 AM
0

Where are you from? Where I am from, they were the only reason the majority of the enslaved people could learn how to read.
/r/MensRights24/11/25 11:23 AM
1

Name one thing I said that was false. Biden defender.
/r/MensRights22/11/25 06:19 AM
1

Am I wrong though?
/r/MensRights21/11/25 12:46 PM
1

Demolished
/r/MensRights20/11/25 04:00 AM
-1

I mean they are all gay far right pedos so what is the difference.
/r/MensRights20/11/25 02:57 AM
0

To right? Libs are as far right as possible my guy. If a corporation individually decided to prioritize hiring women, a libertarian would say they are free to do so. Am I wrong? I don't know what these ppl are doing here saying that only they can support men's rights when the only rights they are ok with in the first place are of corporations. Not wanting to be a slave of billionaires isn't emotional, Stockholm syndrome is.
/r/MensRights20/11/25 02:47 AM
4

Ok comrade Lenin.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 03:37 PM
-1

Based. The downvotes, are from the feminazis.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 03:35 PM
0

What do you think about libertarians historically supporting child labor and 8 year old coal miner boys dying of black lung? Do you think a private corporation should be allowed to prioritize hiring more women than men if they were to independently choose to do it?
/r/MensRights19/11/25 03:20 PM
0

Great, but by DEI they dont mean women only scholarships or “hiring more women initiatives”, they are focused on the race part of it. There is no way they would ever attack the women's stuff or specifically call it out, let alone actually do something about it. If I am wrong, tell me, I would love to see them talking about women specific stuff. And even if they were to, the rest of the 99 percent of the anti men stuff that conservatives believe in remains.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 03:08 PM
1

I never said anything about a monarchy, What would you call it than? Is a dual party system show logical benefit at all? If your primary issue is with the billionaires having control of the current government, how would having a single corporate party instead of two change anything? Seize assets of the corrupt billionares You think there are non corrupt billionaires?
/r/MensRights19/11/25 10:03 AM
2

The EU interferes and decides in matters that would be better handled by the national government ( reason why UK left) Dissatisfaction with economic policies,regulations, That was exactly what I was talking about. I feel like most people dislike EU because of their regulations against corporations. including intra-EU migration And that was what I was referring to when I said that the Brexit corpos were lying. They made money from deregulation and regular people becoming poorer while they increas…
/r/MensRights19/11/25 08:35 AM
2

just hope people realize this and demand change before it gets too bad. There is a reason why they push these social issues on people. They want people to blame everything but the economic system, and if you look at history, when people actually start waking up, they start funding more and more extreme ideologies. American corporations were funding the hell out of Nazi Germany, for example. The rich need us so much more than we need them. That is why they are pushing so hard for more automation,…
/r/MensRights19/11/25 08:03 AM
1

to be honest I don't think there should have been separate parties cuz it wouldn't make sense a country divided will definitely not prosper How would a monarchy help the workers? The whole issue is that billionaire aristocrats control all parties. How would them controlling a single party instead of multiple help?
/r/MensRights19/11/25 07:52 AM
2

Even if smaller countries had more power, you would still have the EU enforcing laws in the EU countries, otherwise, what is the point? Can't they just leave if they don't like it?
/r/MensRights19/11/25 07:48 AM
4

Holy Based.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 07:43 AM
-1

Only libertarian can be pro-MRA because it focuses on freedom This is just goofy. Most Libs care about the freedom of corporations to use child labor and don't care about fairness or human suffering at all. They love the current status quo of billionaires funding feminism and dictating our laws.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 07:40 AM
0

You are a Biden supporter? Gross.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 07:32 AM
2

If there was a country that historically enforced free trade and free market laws on others, it would be the US. When the UK was in the EU You said that they forced non EU countries to change laws. The UK was voluntarily participating in the EU, and they left the moment they wanted to. And the government just deregulated corporations even more while not doing any of the things the people voted for Brexit for in the first place.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 07:29 AM
2

Yep, the only choice you get to make is on social issues. Both sides are the same when it comes to corporate interests. Yeah, and because of their total control over all media, they even dictate the popularity of many of these social issues. As long as these aristocratic billionaires exist, they will have total control over the government, no matter the system. No one has ever managed to go against the interests of the ruling class through voting.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 06:31 AM
-6

The conservative side doesn’t see men as evil. They just look at men and their problems and expect them to fix themselves. They treat men as evil, though. They might use softer and more appealing language, but fundamentally they treat men the same exact way the Liberals do. Conservatives will say that it is a man's "duty" to be a third class citizen, while liberals will say that men "deserve" to be third class citizens. One might sound nicer, but functionally they are advocating for the same thi…
/r/MensRights19/11/25 06:07 AM
-1

EU parliament controls order countries laws What laws? The most I remember the EU's laws affecting other countries is the pro consumer laws, like when they forced Apple to change their charging ports to USB C lol.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 04:39 AM
3

It's not left vs right, as long as men don't get organized and demand fair treatment, they will all sell us out when it benefits them.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 04:36 AM
-3

This, the right is good at manipulating men into believing they're on their side In a way this makes them way more insidious, and that type of thinking is what even led to the current men hating society in the first place. At least when liberals attack men it's more obvious so people actually fight against it.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 04:31 AM
0

Trump always says I have never heard him say that, but Trump says everything, he is a politician. They all see women as defenseless, virtuous children like creatures that need defending. That type of thinking led to men accepting the men hating ideologies. Conservatives use less blatant language, but they are just as aggressive against men, if not more. I have heard plenty of traditional women and men who think that men should pay for everything while they support women only scholarships and job…
/r/MensRights19/11/25 04:23 AM
2

So, basically you're defining "right" as capitalist. Who defines capitalism and selling workers out to the corporations as leftist? Maybe the Tankies. You are the one defining Neo Liberalism as "leftist" while in reality you are on the same side. You can argue about word definitions all you want, but if you are pretending like any of the parties aren't just ruled by billionaires, then you are delusional. So you're a Socialist. YAWN. You were the one complaining about "billionaires" funding the D…
/r/MensRights19/11/25 04:17 AM
3

All billionaire tech titans except Musk support the Democrats. Are you joking? Though the point I was making in the first place was that the Democrats are also right wing Neo Liberals who support trans rights while also supporting far right capitalism and are extremely corporate and pro business. Dems vs Republicans is a fake choice anyways, they will all prioritize the interests of the business owners over the workers as long as they exist.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 03:43 AM
1

I just lean with the one that I feel more welcomed by That is why I said "less blatant language", in a way they are more insidious because of that. They functionally support the same things the feminist women do, while pretending to be on your side. Conservatives expect men to be providers, but they still support women getting not only equal work opportunities but more, just like the feminists do. They also see all men as inherently more violent and less trustworthy and functionally "believe all…
/r/MensRights19/11/25 03:20 AM
8

Which side doesn't treat all men like they are evil?
/r/MensRights19/11/25 03:12 AM
7

far Left Establishment lol. So it is about left vs right? The fact that people consider Joe Biden and Neo Liberalism "far left" is just proof of how right wing the establishment is. The establishment is just billionaire business owners who will support anyone that earns them money.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 03:07 AM
0

Ancap?
/r/MensRights19/11/25 03:05 AM
-3

Whenever I see a misandrist bash all men, it’s always been a liberal woman. Conservatives use less blatant language, but they are just as aggressive against men, if not more. They still promote the idea that women should get special treatment. I have heard plenty of traditional women and men who think that men should pay for everything while they support women only scholarships and job opportunities and also bash men and call them useless because they don't make more than their wives. These cons…
/r/MensRights19/11/25 03:03 AM
1

Yes, they often see certain men as disposable Certian? They have no problem with all men being used as cannon fodder and women receiving special treatment as long as they go to church.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 02:52 AM
-1

The Third way where have I heard that before? LOL.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 02:47 AM
-1

Based Communist.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 02:45 AM
9

Not realizing that benevolent sexism plays a huge role in why society doesn't think a woman can be President At least in the West, they have found a way to synthesize the anti men beliefs of conservatism with feminism. There are plenty of female presidents, but women are special idea remains.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/11/25 02:41 AM
8

benevolent sexism At this point it's not even benevolent, it's straight up self hating sexism.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/11/25 02:38 AM
7

benevolent sexism At this point it's not even benevolent, it's straight up self hating sexism.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/11/25 02:38 AM
10

I mean, a lot of incels are very misandrist, they hate other men and simp for women.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/11/25 02:37 AM
12

I wish. Have you talked to an average person? People don't usually say it as bluntly as this, but all of society reinforces the idea that women are intrinsically deserving of special treatment.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/11/25 02:34 AM
9

“hating men” is definitely the reason american women tar and feathered young boys to shame them for not wanting to go die in wwii btw Yup, and it's the same in every single war. Regular men get shamed and forced into one of the most horrific things a human can experience, with the excuse of “defending their family,” by women and society in general, while everyone else, including women and the people that actually start these wars, sits at home. And then people like these use even that as an excu…
/r/EverydayMisandry18/11/25 11:53 AM
27

You have not responded to any of my points. Because hateful Hitlerite people like you rely on emotional hate and can't respond to facts. they make the rules.. and create wars.. The ruling class makes the rules, not “men” or “women.” The women have been voting for more than a century, have they not voted for wars and conscription? The only person I see glorifying and defending systematic violence here is you, not men. In every single instance of a female leader, they have been just as ruthless an…
/r/EverydayMisandry18/11/25 07:01 AM
38

very few women are in that club.. Are you talking about the leaders or the voters? Every single ruling-class woman that has gotten into a leadership role has behaved exactly the same. If you are talking about normal people, then when have the women voted for peace while the men voted for war? Men are systematically murdered, and they have accepted it only because they are lied to by the ruling class that they are “defending their family.” The only reason they even accept it is that they are thin…
/r/EverydayMisandry18/11/25 06:50 AM
42

The wars are pushed by men This is either a joke or a completely ignorant and uneducated sexist justifying the systematic genocide of boys that every part of the ruling class has supported, whether female or male. Every single female ruler and politician throughout history has behaved the same. And the voting women have never supported pacifism any more than the rest of the population.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/11/25 06:40 AM
0

Of course you can't correct any of the points I made, because they are factually correct. You don't have the time or interest to have actually formulated thoughts and instead spew hateful religious propaganda. How would you correct anyone else? All religions contain anti men dogma. Why are these women worshipping ultra-religious fashies on this sub? I don't understand.
/r/MensRights14/11/25 07:27 AM
-1

Rude? I am sorry if I hurt your feelings. But I don't think I was rude at all, especially compared to you calling atheistic and communist views disgusting and comparing them to female supremacists.
/r/MensRights14/11/25 07:25 AM
0

Agreed, your opinions don't deserve effort to formulate. It's effortless to believe mindless propaganda.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 03:36 PM
-1

They're liberal, though All capitalists follow different flavors of liberalism. These people are neither godly nor capitalist There is a reason massive corporate media has been promoting this ideology, and it's not because Disney is atheist or communist. The same people that spread and fund religion are funding these anti men organizations and ideologies. Because fundamentally they rely on spreading hate and dividing people to control them.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 03:31 PM
-1

It has been religious capitalist libs that have been pushing female supremacism since the start, though. Corporations made a lot of money from women entering the workforce, using it as another opportunity to depress the wages of the workers.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 03:21 PM
0

The godlessness and the communism. Wow, riveting commentary. You seem to put a lot of thought into your opinions, makes sense from a spiritoid.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 03:12 PM
-1

What is wrong with being a godless commie? God forbid someone doesn't believe in spirits.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 01:20 PM
1

Everyone loves free speech until they hear something they don't like.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 01:18 PM
6

Every day reddit society becomes more and more hostile towards men.
/r/MensRights11/11/25 07:14 AM
5

To be fair, there is no point arguing with someone who hates you. You won't reason someone out of an emotional position. But if you were to argue with someone like this, I feel like stating facts of what is happening to men is harder to deflect from than arguing about definitions of words.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/11/25 03:05 AM
4

I mean, if anything, that definition would make misogyny not real, there are tons of systematic prejudices against men. Conscription, courts, and giving more education and job opportunities to women would be just some of them.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/11/25 01:09 AM
39

Cognitive dissonance has never stopped hateful, evil people like these. There is nothing they won't justify if they feel like it benefits them.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/11/25 06:37 AM
-5

Millions of working men will be impoverished because of these billionaires. Then they will get called failures as men by the whole society because they can't afford to financially carry their whole family on their backs. Just like it happened when these same people abused feminism to depress the wages of the workers.
/r/MensRights03/11/25 12:21 PM
56

What do you mean? Everyone knows that any woman would be fortunate if a stranger slapped them with their penis.
/r/MensRights03/11/25 02:48 AM
39

They’re likely right You don't know, and it doesn't matter either way. Imagine saying this about a woman in a similar situation.
/r/MensRights03/11/25 02:45 AM
0

Plenty of crazy people oppose him, but there are no reasonable people who don't oppose him. Correction: Unless you are a billionaire that funded him, then he is making you tons of money while increasing taxes on regular people, cutting social spending, granting you tax breaks, and deregulating. In that case you would be crazy not to support him.
/r/MensRights29/10/25 02:41 AM
1

Yup, when people are privileged, they grow accustomed to it and don't perceive the inequality as evil but as a right they are entitled to.
/r/MensRights28/10/25 06:04 AM
1

I mean, famously, pastors are always in need of little children. So it makes sense that they would do whatever they can to get more.
/r/MensRights27/10/25 04:27 PM
14

Always have been.
/r/MensRights27/10/25 04:22 PM
15

Traditional and "family" values have always been about enforcing inequality and shaming men into prioritizing women over themselves.
/r/MensRights27/10/25 04:12 PM
68

Stop attending churches
/r/MensRights27/10/25 04:00 PM
6

That is why we need actual equality
/r/MensRights27/10/25 06:51 AM
28

The consequence of women's liberation was that the greedy corporations and billionaires used it to depress the wages of the workers and erode labor rights. The same with immigration. Now these same billionaires who abused immigration and feminism to enrich themselves are using the anti-immigrant and anti-feminist sentiment as an excuse to get elected and increase the taxes on regular people while granting themselves tax breaks and defunding social programs.
/r/MensRights27/10/25 06:47 AM
3

We need ethnocentrism The least fascistic person to use the phrase traditional values
/r/MensRights27/10/25 06:40 AM
6

Yeah, I like how these traditional value types consider the completely anti-men and unequal society that we have right now as equality and use it to prove that inequality is actually awesome. They don't care about the movement, they just want to push the same agenda of women being seen as defenseless children that need to be taken care of that got us feminism in the first place.
/r/MensRights27/10/25 06:37 AM
1

I think having pets humanizes all animals in some of the owners eyes regardless of the species.
/r/MensRights25/10/25 11:49 AM
1

Are dogs some type of rock? lol Animals are animals
/r/MensRights25/10/25 11:45 AM
4

Either way, men will be worse off no matter which political side is dominant, because they all consider treating women better than men to be virtuous.
/r/MensRights25/10/25 06:40 AM
2

I feel like pets play a huge role in turning people into vegans.
/r/MensRights24/10/25 03:02 PM
2

Yeah so many god damn vegans
/r/MensRights24/10/25 02:53 PM
7

I do think that feminists exaggerate and revise history a lot, but to be fair, women were forced into marriage a lot. Although at the same time most men and women back then were slaves and weren't allowed to own property, get an education, or a job they wanted.
/r/MensRights24/10/25 02:48 PM
10

haha good one Most women don't go to prison for normal crimes let alone rape
/r/MensRights24/10/25 01:42 PM
7

Rapist women never go to prison
/r/MensRights24/10/25 01:38 PM
9

Even when women rarely get arrested for their crimes, they still receive a lesser sentence than men for the same exact crimes, in the same way that being a minor would usually get you a lighter sentence.
/r/MensRights24/10/25 01:13 PM
3

I think this type of thinking is also just as damaging to men and just feeds feminism The reason men of previous generations and even now let it get this far is because they see women as children that need to be taken care of and not as normal human beings with the capacity for evil just the like everyone else.
/r/MensRights24/10/25 11:54 AM
21

"It's just how nature works" is the same argument the people who want more power over their wives use. Nature doesn't make the laws, humans do.
/r/MensRights24/10/25 11:24 AM
24

You are just justifying why men are treated like second class citizens and their lives are seen as secondary to women's. It doesn't matter whether it is war, natural disasters, or a ship sinking, it's always the same. What you have said doesn't dispute anything I have said.
/r/MensRights24/10/25 11:18 AM
6

Being treated better does mean being loved more
/r/MensRights24/10/25 11:13 AM
23

When a tragedy happens, it is always "women and children" that people care about the most. Men's lives don't matter as much as women's to them. This is an objective fact.
/r/MensRights24/10/25 11:12 AM
21

But not as bad as when it happens to a woman Unless, it was a woman doing a bad thing to a man than the man probably did something to deserve it
/r/MensRights24/10/25 11:02 AM
1

They aren't stupid they are intentionally evil
/r/MensRights24/10/25 10:30 AM
3

Actually based commenter
/r/MensRights24/10/25 10:27 AM
17

I mean, everything is
/r/MensRights24/10/25 10:18 AM
16

Dogs love food
/r/MensRights24/10/25 10:13 AM
36

It is just societal brainwashing. People get it drilled into their heads from childhood, and if they point it out, both men and women will collectively shit on them.
/r/MensRights24/10/25 10:12 AM
25

Loved unconditionally doesn't mean bad things don't happen to them A lot of children experience horrible things too, but I think any sane person would agree that a normal person treats a random child very differently than a random adult. When a bad thing happens to a child, it is rightfully seen as especially bad, but when a bad thing happens to a woman, for some reason it is also seen as especially bad It is always women and children, but no one cares about men.
/r/MensRights24/10/25 10:02 AM
1

Kind of getting off topic, and you aren't directly responding to what I have said. You are linking random hormones and chemicals that have some influence on our brains, but we aren't even sure what But either way, humans, unlike other animals or programmed robots, have more agency in their actions. Feelings influence us, but at some level we have the ability to choose to not follow them. Just because you are experiencing hunger due to some chemicals in your brain doesn't mean that you can't deci…
/r/MensRights24/10/25 09:42 AM
0

What does that even supposed to mean, and what's up with the links? Am I talking to a bot?
/r/MensRights24/10/25 09:12 AM
0

Sounds like you think that men falling over themselves to compete for women is a good thing, and the only bad part is them not being appreciative enough?
/r/MensRights24/10/25 09:02 AM
5

I was trying to make a joke. I think women were still privileged in a lot of ways back when people had "traditional values", and what we see nowadays is the natural progression of treating women as defenseless children. I believe equality is what we should strive for.
/r/MensRights24/10/25 08:55 AM
-1

You don't understand equality is a lie made up by the woke dude. What we need is traditional values, not equality.
/r/MensRights24/10/25 08:45 AM
0

Religion isn't necessary to have monogamy or any other societal value But regardless of that, how is monogamy or the genes your primary issue with how men are being treated? We have been used as meat shields in war for as long as humanity has existed, and now men are slowly being turned into second class citizens by our governments.
/r/MensRights24/10/25 08:29 AM
-4

That would be woke
/r/MensRights24/10/25 07:15 AM
13

You shouldn't, feminists are just female supremacists who use equality as a convenient shield. They despise men.
/r/MensRights24/10/25 07:05 AM
18

Women traditionally get treated like children in many aspects of life, and of course all the feminists are happy about it because it benefits them. Unfortunately, a lot of men also buy into this idea that it is somehow virtuous for their lives to be considered less valuable than women's. That is the same justification they use on soldiers.
/r/MensRights24/10/25 04:50 AM
-5

Who needs men's rights when you have Jesus and tRAdiTioN
/r/MensRights24/10/25 12:10 AM
50

I mean, that is true, but from my experience lots of conservatives also just laugh at the concept of men's rights because they see women as benevolent creatures that men have to protect.
/r/MensRights23/10/25 10:22 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter