TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

UnabsolvedGuilt Archive

View 0 posts and 92 comments by UnabsolvedGuilt on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

Jesus
/r/EverydayMisandry24/03/26 05:28 PM
6

Maybe not legally, but colloquially that is def under the umbrella of what we call rape. If ever in that situation and it’s hard for a lot of men to use that word because they are not trying to imply or even accuse their girlfriends of being rapists bc that has the moral loading of violence and malice that may not be present in these coercive situations It is rape but I wish we had more developed language for this type of rape because the word itself has so much moral loading. I don’t think most…
/r/MensRights23/03/26 08:17 PM
1

Gotcha, ty for patience
/r/MensRights22/03/26 08:01 AM
1

Last question and I’ll leave it here and accept that I may just not be connecting the dots, I understand what you are saying that men live for a shorter amount of time after retirement than it seems women do… how does that connect to the original argument you brought it up in? Like is the point to say that the existence of a pay gap (assuming it does exist in the way you define) is not a problem due to being offset by the fact that men will generally die sooner?
/r/MensRights22/03/26 06:57 AM
1

I may actually be stupid because I’m struggling to understand, but in the last paragraph are you just saying that retirement age for men is actually low for men considering life expectancies?
/r/MensRights22/03/26 06:24 AM
1

Just curious, what is the last point about retirement age to life expectancy relevant to- or ig what are you trying to connect it to in this convo
/r/MensRights21/03/26 10:42 PM
10

“Ever notice how women are prejudiced and encourage discrimination” is what she’s actually saying btw. Backhanded compliment if you can even call it that
/r/EverydayMisandry21/03/26 09:34 PM
1

Legally I don’t think so bc you can press charges for that I think that doordasher recording the nude man in his home sleeping is a good example of that. A lot of noise online gross people who will always other women no matter how wrong, but the narrative quickly shifted when the law got involved. The law (and government broadly) is a reflection of the people’s will to some degree, and I do think most people are in favour of punishing that behaviour
/r/MensRights18/03/26 10:31 PM
2

I will reply to the full thing when I get a chance but that last paragraph caught my eye: “Last thing...you sound like that one guy who defended Trump's pro-crime behaviour because he said "we are past that point", you are just outright believing in tribalism and want the other side "destroyed". You have no difference to the conservatives who have no pleasure in life other than to "own the libs".” I am “the libs” here. You are disingenuous as fuck for that and you know it, gtfoh with that nonsen…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/26 09:36 PM
2

Yeah I read the replies and it seems like boring concern trolling.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/26 07:26 PM
3

I’ve read EVERY reply and comment on this post. There is no “we” here if you are only superficially aligned with the left, and don’t seem to care about principally left leaning stances without pretending all the problems exclusively come from conservatives, or obfuscate the root of certain problems as if feminism or other left leaning movements have never held structural power. You are choosing to define male systemic discrimination as non systemic and making an arbitrary distinction between cul…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/26 07:21 PM
6

The first post by the cup of milk guy is 100% ai generated. They are definitely a dissent bot, not sure abt the others
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/26 06:49 PM
3

That person has been trolling in here for the months since I’ve joined, no clue why they have not been moderated against
/r/MensRights14/03/26 07:44 AM
17

I was just having this convo w a group of guy friends and one of them jokingly said he was a bit misandrist as a way of better a becoming feminist. I glad I vocally disagreed and pushed back in front of everyone to say that even they were being dishonest in the way feminists tend to by bending reality to fit sexist presumptions without critically examining them Does not matter whatsoever if they are left or right wing, straight women as a whole have a terrible engagement with sexual discourse wh…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/26 04:26 PM
2

I don’t deny that you are thinking with good faith but this post still reads as concern trolling in a way that my mind is currently too tired to articulate
/r/MensRights10/03/26 05:12 AM
1

Fantastic post!!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/03/26 06:19 AM
6

Easy drop
/r/MensRights09/03/26 01:41 AM
2

Just another double standard.
/r/MensRights02/03/26 01:53 AM
2

I see, thanks for explaining!
/r/MensRights28/02/26 04:14 AM
2

Oh I didn’t know that’s how it works, thanks. Usually shows when there’s a deleted msg so I was confused by that notif
/r/MensRights28/02/26 02:43 AM
1

You regularly post about math but can’t understand sourcing your claims. Childish and pathetic, glad your post was removed
/r/MensRights27/02/26 08:49 PM
12

Racism and misandry are borderline inseparable when misandrists are desperate to find brown men to pin their animus on. I’m an atheist so it’s not my prerogative to defend Islam, but it is still extremely noticeable how South East Asian men always get the worst hate, even when the commenters are factually incorrect
/r/EverydayMisandry27/02/26 06:41 PM
3

My guy, you are smart enough to know to source your own data and to NOT rely on ai to confirm your biases for you. Thats not intellectually honest at all, low effort post
/r/MensRights27/02/26 06:15 PM
3

Google ai lol? Low quality borderline rage bait post, please do better
/r/MensRights27/02/26 05:58 PM
2

Did you mean to say that to me? I would agree tho yeah, it is problematic imo the way governments are involved in marriage. Still, I can’t imagine a proper enough alternative system to propose
/r/MensRights27/02/26 05:57 PM
2

This is a bit of a fanatical one but I think even if it means processes are longer, it should all be paid for by tax dollars so that the parties have free attorney representation. Having to pay thousands and ending up in years worth of debt just to get divorced is just crazy to me. So many people get financially crippled trying to deal w family courts and it is a tactic ppl with more financial support use against those with less, treating it as a war of attrition until the other party gets sick …
/r/MensRights27/02/26 05:44 PM
5

Beautifully stated
/r/MensRights27/02/26 05:41 PM
0

I agree in principle it should be general nonviolent rhetoric, but in society as it currently exists I think it’s important for men to hear specifically not to hit women EVER- bc no matter correct you may be in the situation, you will only ever be punished for it. It will never be worth it, not even in self defense
/r/MensRights27/02/26 05:20 PM
2

U/0cupofmilk I see notification of a reply but it doesn’t show when I click on it for some reason. Shows that you quoted my last sentence which I do stand on in case there was and contention abt that; the men’s rights movement is anti sexual discrimination and that includes misogyny
/r/MensRights27/02/26 02:49 PM
11

Unless you have specific names to call out, this post is tantamount to concern trolling and serves no positive purpose outside of validating yourself. Stop being vague and criticise who you mean to criticise instead of generalising whilst talking abt how bad it is to generalise Like this entire paragraph, “Male advocates often lump all women into the category of feminism,- WHO says that? Feminism is obviously an ideology that someone would have to agree with to be a feminist, not defined by sex.…
/r/MensRights27/02/26 01:48 PM
10

Please be serious. You asked me directly to explain why I called you disingenuous, so I tried to explain in fully that I wasn’t doing that, then tried to reiterate so you weren’t misunderstanding my criticism of your original comment as a personal attack. I was engaging with what you said to clarify confusion, and that mess I’m just looking to argue? Whatever. Not here to change your mind, but I will still vocalise my dissent to make it clear to anyone reading that “The Responsibility falls on o…
/r/MensRights26/02/26 08:46 PM
9

I don’t think YOU are being disingenuous, it’s the talking point specifically that is disingenuous bc there is a lot of assumptions being taken for granted when you make it about individual accountability to just be an autodidact. Criticising your ideas (more specifically your words) isn’t a judgment if your character or intentions, that is something people tend to get sidetracked on with online arguments- but your intentions don’t really matter as much as the salience of the actual point itself…
/r/MensRights26/02/26 08:09 PM
8

Completely disingenuous engagement unless you think there is literally never any value in social welfare systems. If people have predictable outcomes depending on factors like location and wealth, then no, it’s not as simple as saying the problem would be fixed by telling everyone to just pick up a book and read more. Takes for granted that you even know what to read for the sake of continued education and enrichment, considering a lot of high selling consumer lit is just porn.
/r/MensRights26/02/26 06:44 PM
2

Oh cool
/r/EverydayMisandry26/02/26 05:47 PM
2

Oh you’re good, what’s your native language?
/r/EverydayMisandry26/02/26 05:28 PM
5

I understand wanting to be careful of biases, but that doesn’t seem like critical thinking if the competition imposed by the other men is still for the purpose of attracting the best women- which it does tend to be It is generally true that across wealth brackets the majority of consumer household spending is done by women and not to a significant degree. You can claim that other men push each other into competing for high paying jobs sure, but what is the reward for it especially when most of t…
/r/EverydayMisandry26/02/26 05:09 PM
1

I get that point bc it would be inference to extrapolate from a city to larger society. I think you can reasonably infer from that type of hypothetical that no outside influence is built in, but either way I think you can reasonably make some claims isolated to big cities bc they are really societies of their own Like if this were to happen in New York City or Tokyo then even just isolated to those cities you would see significant behaviour changes worth talking abt since that type of violence i…
/r/EverydayMisandry22/02/26 05:11 PM
1

That’s what I said though, his last reply wasn’t even a counter argument- he just made an accusation of misandry as an insult then blocked. If you are the previous person he replied to; your arguments were already clearly stated as I am choosing to engage with them in our other thread. Maybe the upvote system on Reddit makes people more sensitive to this, but blocking exists as a feature for a reason and can be used without any greater justification than they just don’t want to talk to you anymo…
/r/EverydayMisandry22/02/26 04:50 PM
2

Ngl I don’t know why people say stuff like this online after being blocked. It’s not a moral positive or negative, it’s a feature that exists and should be used if the person doesn’t want to be replied to anymore since no one is entitled to a conversation It just is what it is, strange to jump an alt to make a comment abt that calling it immature as if you are owed being able to continue the convo imo. I don’t see what’s it have to do with maturity when his previous reply stopped engaging with t…
/r/EverydayMisandry22/02/26 04:29 PM
1

Okay I get your counter claim, I have a refutation for it that might bridge the gap so lmk what you think The relevance in bringing up non-stranger violence was to substantiate his claim that women are also CAPABLE of mass violence. I don’t think it is explicitly stated in that comment but what he’s likely alluding to as a general men’s advocacy talking point is that societal violence is largely emergent and not innate to gender. For that claim, it matters to express how women can be violent too…
/r/EverydayMisandry22/02/26 04:24 PM
3

What is the purpose of the argument here? As in how it relates to what the other commenters were saying I don’t think it’s disagreeable that stranger violence is more likely to come from a man, but stranger violence is generally not nearly as much of a problem as interpersonal violence and I think the was important to make as a counterpoint Not to mention we understand to a decent degree that bullying and violence expresses itself very differently between the sexes- with many of those cases of m…
/r/EverydayMisandry22/02/26 09:59 AM
1

Agreed
/r/EverydayMisandry22/02/26 03:06 AM
-8

Feminism is a European movement first and foremost and I feel like that does not get said nearly enough when Americans discuss it from a meaningfully different context. The UK, France, and Germany have had so many ideological revolutions from their centuries of history. Feminist narratives are built into their culture in a way that is absolutely taken for granted
/r/MensRights21/02/26 04:14 PM
38

Bc they are not principally opposed to it. Progressives women are ironically the most reactionary people you will ever meet if the topic is gender
/r/EverydayMisandry21/02/26 03:33 AM
6

Perfectly stated
/r/MensRights11/02/26 06:05 PM
29

I’ve observed and thought abt this as well, and I think it’s largely bc (regardless of why) men and women just use language differently. In those examples, the women are hardly ever trying to have a dialogue- they instead try to express and signal disgust bc they know it’ll galvanise enough women and male sympathisers to shout down the opposition and prevent the dialogue from being had. Esp in online spaces, you have to be hyper aware of bad faith engagement from someone looking for a gotcha to …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/25 02:21 PM
7

Great post, will come back to read this again
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/12/25 07:23 AM
8

There are many reasons to disagree with this, but just as a matter of utility- there is value in having narrowly defined terms for abstract concepts. Like it is a good thing to use the word misandry instead of sexism when talking abt something like the draft, saying it’s blanketedly sexist just allows for narratives to be spun to obfuscate the issue and suddenly we have politicians talking abt how women are victimised more in war then men are. Language is a tool, without the ability to communica…
/r/EverydayMisandry17/12/25 06:51 PM
4

It’s interesting because I understand the arguments on a logical level, but what bothers me is the real-world applications of these thoughts. It just makes it so that people who are objectively better off put off or never had kids, and most kids will continue being born to poor families anyway cause it’s not like they have access to this info. It’s troubling for future generations and what the economy is going to be like after the boomers are fully gone. Not the it’s necessarily anyone’s respons…
/r/EverydayMisandry15/12/25 09:32 PM
1

It is.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/12/25 06:09 PM
12

The irony is that “adhering to ideology and ignoring reality” is literally what you’re doing in your claims here, you just think your ideologies are just enough to supersede anyone else’s perspective
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/12/25 08:50 PM
10

There is no reason to attribute being an inherent protector or virtuousness to gender, this is just repackaged reactionary thinking. Idky you would expect anything other than disagreement with this sub when our contention is with gender essentialism in any form, even seemingly positive. Benevolent sexism is sexism, and if the material reality of your “virtue” ethics is the continued attitude of politicians treating men as expendable tools of war, you should acknowledge that too instead of preten…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/12/25 08:49 PM
90

sociology is a perfect example of why you should not take for granted what you read on the internet is valid, especially if it has the appearance of credibility. you see a title like this, click int the article, and it’s always some poorly methodised survey of a tiny sample of people. gg x9 peer reviewed journals
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/25 05:28 AM
3

okay read it, and i can see you’re engaging in good faith, but i think you’re straight up wrong to say it doesn’t assume anything. the assumption is built into the logic which is why everyone else except for you is rejecting it, not gonna fully deconstruct it cause other comments like this one and this onehttps://www.reddit.com/r/everydaymisandry/s/K3qm4Ih9V0 explain it properly i don’t know if you can provide accurate analysis here if you are unwilling to engage with the intent of the language.…
/r/EverydayMisandry28/11/25 01:25 AM
15

driving so will check other reply after, but the downvotes on this one did make me chuckle lol
/r/EverydayMisandry27/11/25 05:00 PM
34

very curious to how mr. simon will engage w this!!!
/r/EverydayMisandry27/11/25 04:15 PM
12

agreed, esp if you play online games as a hobby. for one reason or another, a large chunk of the women i’ve befriended thru gaming or on discord have been lesbians straight women from my experiences tend to play games that their boyfriends/husbands got them into playing, so they’re a lot more likely to duo exclusively w their partner and not befriend straight guys in those environments- which i wouldn’t even necessarily blame them for cause a lot of dudes in those spaces will cross boundaries an…
/r/EverydayMisandry24/11/25 11:32 PM
12

100% this. i can name 3 of my female friends that exclusively date women and a handful more that are bisexual, i’d never think of myself as a “straight guy with a lesbian friend”- just a guy with female friends and some of them happen to be gay. i did not seek them out on that basis. i think it’s strange that for things like gender and sexual orientation, despite every single cultural norm being stated to be results of the patriarchy, it’s always women that imo overwhelmingly consider these thin…
/r/EverydayMisandry24/11/25 11:23 PM
17

yep. literally female top commenters in subs like this always have to do the obligatory “not all women” thing against any negative generalisation, yet in women’s spaces they’ll just tell you misandry straight up isn’t real. good joke. they are definitely the more virtuous, more honest, more emotionally intelligent, and better at communicating sex btw
/r/EverydayMisandry24/11/25 08:03 PM
8

nothing in particular, in my experience cis men are mostly accepting of trans men
/r/EverydayMisandry20/11/25 01:13 AM
1

my parents are haitian and same here. the hygiene arguments have always been gross cope
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/11/25 01:03 PM
9

the “men” in those times btw were 15-17 year old boys that grown women could not have more gleefully shipped off to die en masse and never return so they could enjoy the benefits of industrialists using them for cheap labour. moral paragons.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/11/25 11:59 AM
5

you handled that w so much more grace than i would’ve. probs was just gonna say retard and call it a day- few things genuinely more stupid than making war gendered. i wonder what that person thinks of using race to evaluate things like crime 🤔 or what she would think abt women largely abusing children more 🤔 wonder how quickly multi varied analysis would start to matter when it’s not something you can scapegoat men for. “hating men” is definitely the reason american women tar and feathered young…
/r/EverydayMisandry18/11/25 11:40 AM
70

what a strange thing to think. surely even as a misandrist, you must be aware that forceful conscription fulfills these criteria. billions of men (many truly just being boys 15-17) have died in wars over the past century to allow women to think that men have never been subject to unimaginable violence (the type of women who post shit like usually never have any first hand experience with anything suspiciously)
/r/EverydayMisandry18/11/25 02:53 AM
98

love this post. can’t fully expand my thoughts on it rn, but this is definitely something i’ve become more cognizant of and try to actively combat. feminists play so many language games, constantly redefining terms because their narrative of victim hood simply trumps everything else. this is the same way they see no issue in saying stupid shit like women are the real victims of men dying in wars. their perspectives are all that matters
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/11/25 11:36 AM
4

been there buddy. not even halfway thru the week yet 🫠
/r/EverydayMisandry12/11/25 01:08 AM
8

i think you’re mistaken lol, i meant what does this mean in regards to the content of the post. as in how is “he’s trash” every woman’s warning when (anecdotally i admit) it seems like the men that get the most negative attention from women also get the most positive attention. like i’m almost certain whomever made that post figures it applies to andrew tate, and he’s definitely also some women’s “he’s perfect” despite being an utterly despicable person. this sort of cognitive dissonance driven …
/r/EverydayMisandry12/11/25 01:06 AM
18

what does this even mean lol, the whole nice guy vs bad boy meme is abt the “he’s trash” men getting all the attention
/r/EverydayMisandry12/11/25 12:56 AM
2

yep. it’s not even selfish, it’s self-interested, and a lot of women have no issue being self-interested even tho men do so much outsourcing of our identities. don’t know exactly why that is but it’s definitely unhealthy. might just be an easier way to live when you don’t internally feel good abt yourself and can fall back on external praise to not be suicidal lol still, the flaws are glaring. you can be selfishly altruistic, which i’d argue a lot of men are cause we’re raised to be obsessed wit…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/25 05:11 PM
3

true. i think men can learn a lot from feminists, esp regarding decentering. every single man i know lives for female validation one way or another. it’s like oxygen to us
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/25 04:43 PM
3

agreed. unfortunately their misconceptions come from the way people colloquially misuse adhd to refer to their poor attention spans from being addicted to social media and nothing to do with an actual diagnosis. i was definitely what a lot of people would call lazy before i got a proper diagnosis and started medications and treatment. i went from being a D average student in hs to making straight As in college as an adult which I could’ve never expected, and having so much more mental clarity an…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/25 04:20 PM
6

what’s more likely is that we’ll get a think piece abt how female hyper sexuality is linked to trauma from being abused my straight men who are responsible for everything wrong w the world
/r/EverydayMisandry07/11/25 07:52 PM
24

this isn’t a secret to anyone, women just collectively lie abt it (feminist or not) so they don’t have to feel responsible. men do not work dangerous jobs and long hours out of a higher sense of civic duty or naturally sacrificial spirit, we spend most of our time outside the home due to the mating pressures of women wanting men who spend time outside the home. most of them can’t even articulate why they want that, the idea of men not being busy in the way they wish to be just makes them uncomfo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/25 06:48 PM
2

experienced that myself as a teen. my mother would complain for years abt us not doing anything, but as soon as i started being independent and taking agency over my life she would insert herself and say “let me be your mom”. like actually pick one. i have not known a SINGLE friend in my life who’s not had terrible relationships w their mothers btw. fathers seem to be more varied from absent to abusive to perfect and the best person in their lives, but every friend in my age group has struggled …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/25 10:44 PM
2

yep. different rules cause they’re playing a different game that we aren’t allowed to participate in
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/25 09:52 PM
6

agreed, but it’s hard to disregard cause of how dangerous it is. part of what dr k talks abt w the dangers of empathy, being completely ignorant to your selfishly good intentions harming other people
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/25 09:16 PM
16

you are literally the problem. perfect example of everything wrong with this situation. the definition of misandry isn’t blaming women. this isn’t even worth engaging with beyond that point bc even people who criticise feminists know that reducing misogyny to hating men is factually incorrect and dishonest. literally the only thing this serves is to obfuscate and reduce. every single problem that “men” as a category face is somehow the individual MAN’s responsibility to resolve for himself- as i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/25 08:49 PM
4

perfectly well put and i’ve always said this but more broadly extrapolated when people make generalisations, there are always two categories of responsibility: things men do/cause and things that “society” does/causes. the moment something gets defined as being exclusively belonging to women is when all of the sudden we start deconstructing and being nuanced abt different pressures and influenced just bc they don’t want to feel blamed for anything, but they refuse to apply those same logic frame…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/25 09:37 PM
11

plenty of women would bring up their trauma from other women in their youth in response to this, so the contrarian voices aren’t from ppl who don’t remember hs. it’s from ppl who were probably the ones abusing and victimising other ppl to begin with
/r/EverydayMisandry04/11/25 04:04 PM
5

how do you account for what we know abt ancient cultures with huge gender disparities explicitly due to things like aggression, as in the case of sparta? without fact checking myself, i think it’d be reasonable to assume that ancient greek writers wrote a lot abt differences in male/female nature that were later incorporated into the academics of post wwii societies
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/25 03:04 PM
5

one of the ways to evaluate the strength of a (non religious) philosophy is to see how well they resolve their own contradictions. feminism is the only philosophy of its kind that makes no attempt to do so, and feminists are actually very similar to religious apologists the way they will endlessly justify contradictions instead of truth seeking in any meaningful manner that’s why a lot of cultural discourse is endlessly making and complaining abt observations. there are no proposed conclusions t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/11/25 06:01 AM
2

this might be my biggest objection to feminism that would bar me from ever using the label. they want literally the same end goals as red pillers, just coming from different places from how to get there. spent the entire first two decades of my life hearing feminist propaganda abt deconstructing gender norms… just for feminists to reconstruct gender norms in a manner that’s more emotionally convenient without offering any meaningful solutions to things like non violent coercive rape that happens…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 02:31 PM
1

yep
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 02:08 PM
4

unfortunate byproduct of our two party system. so many people have to align themselves with groups they are fundamentally misaligned with just to have institutional power
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 02:03 PM
2

unfortunately ana psych is exactly why a sub like this needs to exist. she’s clearly not conservative and misandrist for the reasons you’d expect from an overtly bigoted right winger- she embodies the dangers of liberal feminism always making and assuming their largely ahistorical claims about gender dynamics are anything close to reflective of reality. this is the misandry that poisons society. i refuse to believe an honest actor could ever believe society blames women for everything, especiall…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 01:57 PM
3

you are not engaging, this is dissonant. i am literally not claiming the act of feigning progressive aesthetics is exclusive to women- i am claiming it is useful to specifically critique women for that behaviour given they are the gender that’s culturally associated with virtue and tolerance. an analogue would be something like- people culturally conditioned to think men are innately more rational or logical than women don’t expect men to be as emotionally reactive or insecure as many of them te…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 01:35 PM
2

brilliant analysis
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 01:09 PM
6

then engage with the point being made? idk how to quote the way i see you guys do on reddit- but the point is that no, “people” don’t do this regardless of gender because women uniquely get grouped in with lgbt in cultural conversations as if their nature as women makes them inherently less prone to bigotry. arguably cause similar problems regarding racial intersectionality with feminists as well
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 12:50 PM
7

you would like to believe that in regards to this specific criticism of women, but i wonder if you do the same in the face of criticisms of men. men generally aren’t seen as “safe” and naturally accepting of lgbt the way women are, despite the category of women largely including homophobes. so yes, the distinction matters
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 12:30 PM
5

literally what value does this comment add to the conversation started by this post. not a matter of good or bad, and we are clearly not reducing all of these different lenses to just “feminism” for reason that you seem to have missed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 12:26 PM
10

there’s a reason why despite whatever racial tensions exist in america, you never see any serious black activists proposing we just start being racist back to white people. it’s a non starter because people who have experienced racism simply want to eradicate it universally, not have even their ideological opponents suffer from it there must be some research that helps understand this phenomena in regards to feminism, but it is true that women tend towards collectivism to a larger degree than me…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 03:10 AM
1

another understated point is the deadliness of colon cancer that just gets no attention because it doesn’t predominately harm women
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/25 09:54 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter