TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

UnbentSandParadise Archive

View 0 posts and 120 comments by UnbentSandParadise on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

To be fair about the 4 year old comment you edited in, the usage of "men and females" in the same sentence like this has some implication that you may listen to some pretty low quality male influencers that are more engaged in a whiny gender wars subculture. I'd suspect you're in your teens or early 20s.
/r/MensRights21/06/26 06:07 PM
1

Cost a little bit but you can buy dedicated voice recorders that are not phones. You could plausibly by using this to record lessons and review them later, if you just so happen to catch something like this in the future. Also make sure where you live has 1 party recording laws otherwise the recording might be useless anyway. Depending on local laws you can't just record someone like this without telling them.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 04:12 PM
26

I thought it was scared like a pussy(cat) honestly.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 05:51 PM
8

Where do you live? You have no kids, in most places I'd assume you split the assets and pay alimony. The longer you spend buying "our" things the less of "your" things you'll have later. As a tip if you're feeling strain she likely feels strain too, even if you don't plan to do this now, pick the best lawyer and get a consultation now to have that option in your pocket. If she decides to leave you she can get consultations from all the best lawyers around and they won't be able to take your case…
/r/MensRights07/02/26 07:40 PM
30

Ah yea but have you considered that a man started this war? So he gets to personally stay off the front line and regular men that played no part in the decision making should be sent instead, because I view men as a monolith.
/r/MensRights02/12/25 05:45 PM
232

Charged with battery for sure. This is why you don't just get reactionary to situations that you don't know the details to. Your intentions don't decide if you can put hands on another person. Now instead of the valiant white knight he's that racist dude that displayed his bias by assuming the black man was committing a crime.
/r/MensRights10/11/25 06:08 PM
1

Yea, if you swapped genders and suddenly this is describing your past sex life then you shouldn't be complaining, these are your people and you actively contribute to this. To elaborate and try to get what I mean as a point across. This isn't about an objective right or wrong, more so your actions are an expression of your values. It's not wrong for people to disagree with this either but people are going to judge you based on their values and should seek people with matching values.
/r/MensRights26/07/25 02:11 PM
2

Yep there it is, 44% of women voted republican and democrats lose, men to blame, I will say I'm seeing more than some reference to this, there is an acknowledgement even if it's not a major talking point there. I have more I could add but I just got this video in my feed and hits my feelings here pretty well, they spent the whole campaign focused on the wrong topic. They won the female votes they were going to get early and beat that horse dead instead of putting a real effort into the male vote…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/24 07:02 PM
16

This is exactly what pushed men away, the average man that is struggling to establish themselves and hasn't been incredibly successful in this economy has no place in the democratic party, the focus on identity politics over economic policy pushed away working class men, especially younger men. If you tell someone that is struggling they are privileged you are going to become poison to them, the conservatives don't have better policies for the working class but they allow men to exist without ma…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/24 03:21 PM
74

Calling it now, the reaction is going to be an outcry from some very vocal groups of people about how this is all men's fault and we're all selfish assholes that hate women, completely ignoring the fact women went out and voted for Trump. The problem they have is that behind the talk about rights they can't make men the social punching bag of privilege and expect to win favour with men in general. I'm Canadian but from the outside looking in it didn't seem like they did much campaigning to men, …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/24 07:14 AM
5

It's not just about circumcision for Ben, he's a shill and a fancy talking moron, he's the definition of a smart person for idiots. Talks fast, uses big words, and is skilled at spouting uncited stats as fact. I have channels where videos of substance are posted and you can get the citations in the video descriptions. Ben does not cite the things he has to say, at best he'll verbally say the name of an organization related to the stat at hand. I'm subscribed to Ben because I like to think I can …
/r/MensRights16/08/24 08:13 PM
20

I can only imagine she understood your opinion on illegal abortions as your opinion of abortions as a whole and felt attacked because you're "against abortions." People with a brain know one of the reasons to support for legal abortions is because the lack of legality doesn't remove the ability to get them, it removes safety standards and regulations. Illegal abortions are more dangerous because you can not confirm the qualifications of people doing it, the safety of any medicine, and sanitation…
/r/MensRights06/07/24 07:41 PM
62

Right in line with the Madona-whore complex is what I was like to call responsible baby syndrome. A woman is strong and independent in the eyes of society unless we're expected to hold them responsible for their own actions, not that women are incapable of receiving blame but if at all possible in a situation the expectation of autonomy and blame will be passed onto a man instead. It's not everyone but it's widespread enough, often men do it to other men, we're not helping each other and I'd als…
/r/MensRights29/06/24 03:27 AM
1

This here is a good point, I had typed up something similar but never got around to hitting send. My problem isn't with the idea of benevolent sexism but rather why it's not a frame I want to be using to progress things. You can use the same script flipping method and what is "benevolent sexism" towards women because they are treated better is also just normal sexism against men because this also means they are treated worse by comparison. The idea of benevolent racism is supposed to be comicall…
/r/MensRights20/06/24 05:43 PM
1

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/benevolent So the problem we have seems to be the definition of the word benevolent, in this case it could be said that if women experience benevolent sexism that could imply that men are not treated poorly by the justice system but rather they are just treated fairly. If we wanted to treat women fairly that means we should be giving them the same punishments men normally receive because that's what we can interpret as the established baseline for fair.…
/r/MensRights20/06/24 05:24 PM
6

Alright, when someone makes a comparison I don't normally assume they're asserting that what is being compared is the exact same thing, rather the point of a comparison is to highlight what is similar. In this case the similarity was the idea of benevolent discrimination and the rather large pitfalls with the ability or inability to prove when discrimination is benevolent or not, the problem with your parody it is doesn't address that at all. I don't normally support discrimination so I would li…
/r/MensRights20/06/24 07:12 AM
5

You can absolutely compare squares to rectangles because a square has 4 sides and 4 right angles, they are a rectangle. You just sidestepped the similarities in order to highlight the potential differences.
/r/MensRights19/06/24 11:22 PM
4

I'd have to dig for the stats if you want good accurate numbers but it's something like a white man is 2.5 times more likely to go to prison than a black woman but a black man is like 6 times more likely than a white man, in the US I want to say 2022. I'm not from the US but their impressively high incarceration rates merits a fair bit more looking into than other countries. Generally seems like there's some level of judgement on both accounts, women regardless of race get the lightest sentence …
/r/MensRights19/06/24 10:57 PM
7

Boils down to the focus we put on the ruling class when we talk about history and neglect the impact that wealth has always had on status. I like to think of it this way, do you think the baroness was more oppressed than the male peasant that plowed the local farm? At the very peak men have ruled over everything but that overlooks that fact that this was a small percentage of men that enjoyed this luxury and other men only got some benefits that trickled down until it was time to die in a war. I…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/24 11:10 PM
14

Just did this, on Canadian internet the very first link on both(after the "featured snippet") is a Canada.ca website page about family violence resources. The snippet for the husband search said new behavior could be in response to increased stress, overall solid search results here.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 02:14 AM
20

It's been touched on a few times, à la carte feminism. Give me a vote but not conscription, or make quotas for CEOs but we don't need that for labourers as popular examples.
/r/MensRights23/05/24 09:53 PM
1

What are the sides in this? The NBA has subsidized the WNBA every year of it's existence because it's never been profitable. One side is getting paid to play basketball and the other has been holding the check for over 20 years. This has been a long term investment for them and they've been waiting for it to start paying, a player like Clark might be the kick to ratings they've been waiting for. One side wants more revenue while the other is looking at the revenue compared to cost and trying to …
/r/MensRights16/04/24 08:36 PM
18

It's just a method of file sharing, it's not inherently illegal. It's like suggesting a baseball bat is a weapon because you can use it to hit people. It could be, it's also a piece of equipment to play baseball.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 06:23 PM
68

Can't forget that she had a scholarship to get a degree in marketing that whole time she was in school. Imagine your education was paid for and you left school to get a 75k salary playing a game you love and people frame it as a raw deal. She's already estimated worth 3m because she was making money in collage. She seems like an exciting player that hasn't complained, the exact type of star to bring eyes to your game and other people are putting a sour taste to that by complaining for her.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 04:03 PM
27

They probably mean lean, seems often thin and lean are misconstrued. Lean is a healthy bodyweight with low bodyfat, so still somewhat muscular. A thin guy is going to have the low bodyfat but also be underweight.
/r/MensRights04/03/24 05:10 PM
5

A pulse squat gives you the same type of workout that a wall sit would but is dynamic and you engage all the stabilizing muscles you don't need when you lean against a wall, it's not a stretch but it's a perfectly valid exercise for strength and stability. Hip thrusts can be easily sexualized but they're a great exercise for building core power and more people in general should do them. Her squat is also deeper then you should be for pulsing, it'd take stress off her knees and put it into her le…
/r/MensRights24/02/24 02:29 PM
7

It was a bad squat. For a pulse squat she should be higher, think sitting in a chair and pulsing at that height, it'll actually kinda suck pretty fast because you're spending the whole time in the zone where you're activating muscles. At her depth most of the stress from the pulses would be going into the joints(probably knees) and not the muscles. In concept the type of stretch she was trying for is dynamic and is better for you before a workout than a static hold stretch(save those for after a…
/r/MensRights24/02/24 02:21 PM
31

People tend to find personal anecdotes more relatable than big stats. Charities also know this and thats why the focus of their commercials are usually about the hardships of X person in Y country dealing with Z problem that you could help for as little as a coffee a day.
/r/MensRights07/02/24 11:43 PM
12

Now you're mistaking oppression with the victim Olympics. The point I made was never who was more oppressed as a gender but I wanted to put some emphasis on impact of position. I was suggesting it was a nuanced topic and both men and women suffered from oppression, it's not a dichotomy. I wasn't trying to prove men had it worse. In day to day life men got to ride the coattails of powerful men and a scrap of power is more than none at all. It may have also been tactical to give men more power so …
/r/MensRights16/11/23 12:57 AM
22

In the past was a lady that married local nobility more oppressed than their male serfs? I think the idea they are suggesting is if you go back in time power was concentrated into the hands of a few men and most others would have also suffered oppression. As someone else pointed out, many oppressed men have been forced to march to their death for the politics of another greedy man. This still exists in what we consider free countries today, when all else is equal men are still reserved to have t…
/r/MensRights15/11/23 11:52 PM
4

She is a doctor, the plan was never for her to fight on the front lines. The medical personal on the front line are almost always combat medics. If they didn't pull her knowing she was a doctor they would change the plan once they found out. The skillset of a doctor is normally too valuable to put on the front lines and they'll lack the tools to be used to their fullest. There is a 99% chance she was always going to end up in a hospital in the rear. That said, a field hospital is going to be hig…
/r/MensRights12/11/23 05:28 PM
1

I made a comment on the first point about culture yesterday so I'll focus on that. I think the position draws a poor conclusion because it creates a flawed reality of sorts. If you remove all social obligations and legal consequences from society I'd expect to suddenly see the worst in most men and women, the problem comes from the idea that we could exist the way we do if we didn't feel social obligations in the first place, we are social creatures and our entire society evolved the way it did …
/r/MensRights07/10/23 03:35 AM
29

A lot of this has to do with the hyper-polite culture they have that also includes trying to keep to yourself. Sure you could grab their arm and yell but to suggest that they should just scream and cause a ruckus in public shows a gross misunderstanding of their culture. You don't know how other cultures act and the way that Japanese people conduct themselves creates the perfect people for both not being willing to get involved in someone else's business and where the victim that already feels e…
/r/MensRights05/10/23 02:50 PM
2

This is the definition of a gotcha. In most cases defending yourself is evidence that can be pointed to and confirm you have a fragile ego. When it come to personal attacks I call this sort of attack being "crazy'd" in the sense the only winning reply is to point out there is no winning reply. If it works it becomes popular.
/r/MensRights26/09/23 09:26 PM
1

The generation they're talking about 91-00 isn't drinking more, they're drinking less. More men drank in the past, while that's still the case this means the closing of this gap and a downward trend would suggest that men have walked away from it faster. This means we should consider putting more effort on women because what we're doing is already causing the current generation of men to drink less. It's weed by the way, my perception is that more men(including myself) are getting high instead o…
/r/MensRights25/09/23 10:11 PM
1

Using ex- and in- as a giveaway I would assume its not much different from external and internal, meaning value from outside and value from inside. The context with the post helps too.
/r/MensRights24/09/23 03:28 PM
20

This point is exactly why feminism isn't about equality (and men don't need mens rights). It does a fine job at making things more equal when times are good but when things go south suddenly it's still women and children first or men to the front line. Modern feminism is still about making the good times better while completely failing to address who is still footing the bill when shit hits the fan. How do we still see a 59 year old man more fit for the military than a 25 year old woman? It's ex…
/r/MensRights23/09/23 02:53 AM
1

Yea, seems like there was collaborative evidence and expert testimony but honestly the details of the case are vague and I don't know what exactly that means specifically, if there are detailed transcripts I haven't seen them. It seems to boil down to the job of the prosecutor is to prove "beyond a reasonable doubt" and with regards to the above it seems the defence failed to poke enough holes and cast doubt on the accusation, if the evidence is really weak you probably shouldn't struggle as the…
/r/MensRights12/09/23 05:27 AM
2

People putting their head up their ass because they think life is like a crime drama where at the last moment they enhanced the photo and it gets them the DNA they needed. Completely forgotten apparently is that we had trials before DNA evidence was a thing and while it's very strong evidence it's not the only evidence considered in a trial.
/r/MensRights11/09/23 04:31 PM
3

He was convicted you can't just keep saying allegedly, it's no different than calling a man with an innocent verdict guilty. The only horse I have in this race is that I like That 70's Show, I don't keep up with the cast but I wouldn't be surprised if he did rape them given the ties to Scientology and the absolute abusive cult of sick fucks they are. People with wealth and power in a cult use it to abuse other people is an incredibly old play to run, lines up perfectly with what I expect out of …
/r/MensRights11/09/23 04:16 PM
2

The thing most guys are overlooking with the whole "Any average woman can just make thousands on Onlyfans." position is that's not really true, at least not true in the way people assume. The average monthly earning for female models on Onlyfans is around 150-250 depending on what source you find on a google search. It's a whole narrative pushed by the company, men are getting jaded over hearing women can make a boat of money basically for free and women are getting tricked into effectively sell…
/r/MensRights18/08/23 08:50 PM
3

From one feminist perspective this removes women from jobs that tend to devalue them as people and there's less risk for things like deepfake issues as an AI just doesn't care. This could unironically be a positive in some areas I think yea. ​ AI could be useful for dealing the less savory side of the fantasy business while I'm sure guys would still find real women appealing so I wouldn't expect it to bulldoze the market for real women either. The losers here are going to be the middlemen like O…
/r/MensRights18/08/23 07:45 PM
7

I support that, it's referred to as a paper abortion. I both support a woman's right to make the decision with her body and I respect the man's decision not to be apart of it. It's not equal but it gives both parties the fairest say in their future.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 07:36 PM
16

This is the right answer, get the paternity test papers delivered again with notice from the lawyer she is to stop calling you the father until the test results come back. I'm not a lawyer and I can't tell you how/if it'll hold up but I know I would be looking to make a good legal paper tail yesterday. You either get her off your back(she is likely avoiding this because she cheated) or she will take the test and you'll get a conclusion.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 03:47 PM
18

Mental fatigue is the term they are looking for. The cure is doing things like spending time mediating, exercise, eating well, and getting into a consistent sleep cycle. How this spirals is the worse the fatigue feels the easier it becomes to start overlooking these things. Now, I live alone so I have to do my own chores but I also make sure I slot in time for these other things or I can get days at work where it feels like my brain is surrounded by molasses and it just makes doing anything hard…
/r/MensRights08/06/23 11:02 PM
25

"I've been interested in pursuing growth into a leadership role and to that end I noticed that you only offer leadership lunches to women. What resources can you point me towards or what help could the company provide me with in getting an additional initiative started?" I'd send something like this in an email. Best case you get to grab onto this and it looks good on you, worst case you have their hard nope in writing, regardless this isn't kicking up a fuss, it's seeing the space that could us…
/r/MensRights06/06/23 07:53 PM
6

Talk to a lawyer for the legalities of it where you live.
/r/MensRights06/06/23 02:33 PM
9

On a positive note if he does get shit he can talk about it at work.
/r/MensRights31/05/23 06:18 PM
4

Or lack of interest, it's 2 things that without any interest to dig into is easy enough to lump together. It's just as easy to attribute ignorance as malice. Similar to how we in "the west" are a fan of grouping countries like Japan, Korea, and China into "the east" while they do not attribute this to themselves and definitely view themselves as very separate. This whole idea stems from the east and west of what? It's a simple selfish way to help view the world instead of figuring out nuance.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 04:38 PM
2

Yea, check my other reply for a summary I now know I do not know, sorry man.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 07:01 PM
12

Yea, I've been looking up the details of child support laws a little more for where I live out of interest right after posting and they are in some ways sound but there's a lot of really dumb stuff in there.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 06:48 PM
58

Is your lawyer aware of this already? Have you talked to them about how this doesn't make sense? At worst I'd suggest you would be happy to see the money you pay while you have your daughter put into a trust for your daughter instead.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 06:01 PM
2

You have to know the local laws, where I live(Canada) it would be the intent at the time that matters so in this case the testimony would ultimately amount to she initiated with consent and was willingly involved, so her intentions at the time are clear and there was no wrong doing. Look up how the law where you are on vacation defines sexual assault and contact a local lawyer who specializes in these cases - depending on the wording of the laws it's possible this isn't uncommon to pull and you …
/r/MensRights05/05/23 03:53 PM
1

I didn't claim identical, you even quoted that for me. Now, you should consider reading that link for details.
/r/MensRights04/05/23 03:59 PM
10

Why have a women's only space in a gym when the equipment the men use works just fine? It helps with women who are self conscious or intimidated to start going and stick with it and that's business. Men and woman are not that different but if that's not convincing. There has been a lot of interest in bringing more women into the game of poker, and one way operators like PokerStars are looking to do that is through women-only events. While, in theory, poker is a mind-sport with no inherent gender…
/r/MensRights03/05/23 11:30 PM
4

Police outside the US tend to be better trained for this. You'd be used to dealing with the Reid technique where they pile on pressure before offering to help you out while you confess to make things less bad(spoiler: you haven't made things less bad*). Britain and other places use what's called the PEACE method where the goal is actually information gathering. They're not trying to pressure her because a confession isn't the goal, it's any information she'll give that they are after and they'll…
/r/MensRights29/04/23 01:04 AM
3

How familiar are you with the Madonna–whore complex? I think it might interest you as a concept if you haven't ran into it already.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 01:22 AM
4

I personally wear a bit of a tinfoil hat on this one and believe the media narrative is meant to divide keep people divided on purpose. An inability for a population to find unity suits anyone who finds their way into the controlling class just fine. I try to spend a fair bit of time listening to feminist issues and a lot of the time there's issues that could marry up that are often ignored in favor of ideas that attack each other. A big issue I don't see put to the forefront is enough is violen…
/r/MensRights23/04/23 10:33 AM
2

I would suggest you consider reading some Machiavelli, and then some works that are critical of Machiavelli. A popular quote to get you started with better context. "Since love and fear can hardly exist together, if we must choose between them, it is much safer to be feared than loved because ... love is preserved by the link of obligation which, owing to the baseness of men, is broken at every opportunity for their advantage; but fear preserves you by a dread of punishment which never fails." T…
/r/MensRights22/04/23 09:26 AM
1

Well there could be a conspiracy theory that the powers that control a lot of public information are pushing narratives that intentionally drive marginalized groups away from each other that I think has merit. The people that gain the most from exploitation of people would like very much that all the groups of people stay separate in their cause. In this sense the idea isn't about getting everyone on your side, it's just pushing the right amount of people in different directions so that they nev…
/r/MensRights20/04/23 06:55 PM
1

The people who fought for the end of slavery and equal rights for black people are not responsible for those reparations happening today and it's not responsible for how native people are treated. Don't gish gallop the point, do you have an issue with the end of slavery because of the current state of black rights? I don't have to agree with everything going on today to be unwilling to dig in the past and condemn people to significantly worse in order to avoid the issues of today.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 06:38 PM
-2

Slavery also must somehow impact the modern day social issues for black people. "Black people are never content, no matter what they have. They always want more, no matter the consequences." This is a poisoned mindset to have, going back in time to the women who would have fought for things like single women to have the right to vote or to be allowed to have access to a bank account for things like credit and a mortgage are not to blame for how far the pendulum has swung today. What you are sugg…
/r/MensRights20/04/23 04:48 PM
1

A google search suggests places are linking this to Forbes as the source for this and Forbes is linking to a dead Bloomberg page. Outside that this study from Harvard(*in 2009) might be the source, I would suggest that on top of having more product to buy as a woman this study it also suggests that women are the driving force behind buying large household goods: furniture, vacations, and homes are the examples. If you go out and buy the household groceries you controlled that spending, I would a…
/r/MensRights19/04/23 09:58 PM
12

The difference is that when women objectify their sexuality for everyone is that we're cool with it, the reaction when a man is objectifying themselves just isn't there, another man is going to punch you. This is the part of modern feminism I don't get, you can't just celebrate the things society does to objective yourself and then complain that you're still being objectified. Drunkly flashing your tits for a crowd of random idiots isn't what liberation looks like. Feel free to do whatever you w…
/r/MensRights18/04/23 04:49 PM
5

Yea, you can package anything to be sold to large groups of people, including rugged individual manliness. But you and me, we're different. We have work to do, get your hands dirty and provide. You can't stop there, it's still important to be irresistibly manly, and for that you have my beard shampoo. With this you can now smell like the dangers of an oaktree while providing the security of a modern, sophisticated man.
/r/MensRights11/04/23 01:28 PM
8

Most likely down, many people likely do no care and will keep drinking what they are going to drink, the problem with inclusion is there's a sizable amount the market that drinks beer because it's for men that will move onto a more manly brand while only bringing in a smaller untapped market by comparison. This would be a great marketing strategy if we ever lived in a world where the average woman could be convinced to drink more beer. I was a whiskey drinker(stopped drinking years ago) because …
/r/MensRights11/04/23 12:50 PM
10

For sure, at the stage where someone is attacking your character you're not attempting to persuade them, you're attempting to persuade everyone else by chipping away at their weak position and they'll probably hate that.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 04:37 PM
16

The answer when this happens, regardless of the reason, is just hit them with an "alright, what would you say about -the position they were avoiding restated?-" because the goal of this tactic is to change the subject. If they can get you personally tangled up in the moment you lose the arguement. You don't need to defend your character, defend the position well instead, if they lose credibility in the debate their personal attack only looks worse. Never abandion a position to argue down when yo…
/r/MensRights05/04/23 04:21 PM
6

Plus a very normal cooperative thing to do in response to "why isn't this working?" is to give advice. You might have the answer but maybe if you don't and both of you are an expect on the subject you still do this. The goal is that something you might say either has traction or you hit on the right word that prompts a new independent thought that does solve the problem. You're not talking down, sometimes you need to shift angles to solve a problem and a good way to do that is spring boarding id…
/r/MensRights26/03/23 09:55 PM
1

Yes, food was much more scarce until 1909 when Fritz Huber discovered the process to convert nitrogen from the atmosphere to ammonia. Not putting the cart first is worthwhile, these things becoming human rights should be a priority and that means I think we need more human problem solving towards geared towards these issues. I may not have the answer but I would like to be well intended toward solving the problem.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 10:48 AM
1

Fair, technically that would be the human aspect of democracy at play now that I'm thinking about it a little more. Also I now hate that I see "that's is."
/r/MensRights25/03/23 10:42 AM
1

You don't think something that is currently scarce could be a human right.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 10:17 AM
1

Or if you run down the comment chain you could potentially realize that point was exactly what I was getting at. You could say I was the kid in school everyone thought might be a little racist because I'm always playing devils advocate but consider this my take to explain how citing "influence" and "fairness" will result in you losing unless you're talking to people who already agree with you, like the original poster fell back to equal representation when pressed how does one decide how indluen…
/r/MensRights25/03/23 10:10 AM
1

My answer to this is more investment into automation, I've met women who kick my ass in ability and work ethic but on average you're not going to convince women to shoulder a heavier load of labour. The current system has men doing the bulk of the work, the past systems had men doing the bulk of the work and whatever the future system ends up looking like will have men doing the bulk of the work. Factoring that, the only practical solution I see is to reduce the total amount of labour required a…
/r/MensRights25/03/23 09:45 AM
1

Housing first solves homelessness indiscriminately but this issue effects more men then women. If that isn't desirable because that might benefit women, to me it appears you're suggesting we're better off with the current system that you stated definitely does provide discriminant benefit to women over men instead. If you feel like the current laws are skewed towards treating men like they're second class citizens compared to women a system that works to provide the same livable baseline benefit…
/r/MensRights25/03/23 09:22 AM
0

I'm Canadian. I make 85k(62 USD) a year, have 100% medical, dental and vision coverage, 25 days paid vacation. The last time I went to the hospital because I got stabbed and it hit an artery, a surgeon stitched me up and it cost me $0. I'm 30, I own my car and my mortgage has been pretty reasonable, I'm been putting money into it pretty aggressively. Some prices went up, seemingly needless food price increases is a thing people are talking about but most people I know are blaming the greed of th…
/r/MensRights24/03/23 11:46 PM
-1

This is very unfriendly to actually sit down and reply to, it's just loaded with questions. It's a gish gallop, can you more effectively summarize? I could just quickly go after what I feel are the weakest couple points but you should really just lead with a couple strong points instead.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 10:04 PM
0

I'm not a fan of stalinism but that was nationalistic socialism and I dont like nationalism. Valid point, I have admitted already that was socialism, just not what I would consider a shining example of socialism. That was a ruthless man piloting socialism though industrialization, my version does rely on our already industrialized nation with vastly better ability to manufacture things and a desire to pursue more automation. I'm not trying to build this from the ground up, I'm just transitioning…
/r/MensRights24/03/23 09:42 PM
1

Yea, I can try and pull some documents but you should look into some declassified CIA documents. A summary is that socialism/communism was viewed as a threat to capitalism and so when these nations successfully pop up the CIA pretty much always had their hands on destabilizing it. Give Operation Northwoods some searching, the CIA were willing to terrorize US citizens if it could be used to justify an invasion of communist Cuba at the time. The world doesn't exist in a vacuum, in all cases someti…
/r/MensRights24/03/23 07:42 PM
3

Chicken and the egg? How does one try to pioneer or improve upon anything for the first time by your logic? Humanity didnt come into existence with an innate understanding of capitalism either. I don't think my ideas would have worked in the past but with the advancement of technology in more recent history this is my vision for what society should look like in order to transition to an autonomous society without causing a great deal of despair in the process.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 07:21 PM
-1

Well google suggests in 1975 when Congress passed the laws that brought child support into place it was made up of 100/0 M/F. I dont have statistics but I would assume given the time a majority of judges that played any role in the courtrooms were also men. I would argue that to this day women have already made up less then 50% of the power to cast a vote in these areas, I'm not buying that just giving them 50% of the vote is going to net the results you desire. This system wasn't created by wom…
/r/MensRights24/03/23 05:45 PM
0

The same way most people produce things when they're not a company's owner today. You're still getting paid for it and the profits go into government programs instead of a single persons(or investors) pockets. That what this move is trying to achieve, remove power from the public investors who produce nothing and expect infinite growth and places that power into the hands of the worker that makes the machine function. Another reason I lean this way, when automation happens this is the system tha…
/r/MensRights24/03/23 05:21 PM
-2

And who would you have decide how much influence is inherently unfair?
/r/MensRights24/03/23 05:12 PM
3

The closest is somewhere like Sweden or Norway, I like how they do things and it seems reasonable. They do allow for a mix of public and private businesses and it has a lot to do with their history but seems like a great middle ground for what I desire as an ideal in my head and the reality that we still live in a capitalist driven world for the most part. This video talks a lot about the history of Sweden and about the pros and cons that occurred when the worker unions had gained the control of…
/r/MensRights24/03/23 05:11 PM
3

That is wrong, total public ownership is communism, socialism is limited private ownership. The government would effectively take control of all businesses but not your personal house. Communism = from all according to ability, to all according to need. Socialism = from all according to ability, to all according to production. There's also more than one way to structure socialism, I'm not a fan of stalinism but that was nationalistic socialism and I dont like nationalism. The socialism I advocat…
/r/MensRights24/03/23 04:54 PM
-6

This is too much to be a real answer to me, you expect women to accept they don't get an equal vote on this? Would you call them 3/5ths of a person when considering their say on the matter, that worked out well before. I'm not American but if I were a woman and you somehow did suppress their influence here combined with the restrictive abortion laws getting passed I'd probably seriously consider getting mass shooter level of violent in response and I'd be targeting men in particular. There is no…
/r/MensRights24/03/23 04:42 PM
-1

Socialism. You have housing first, universal health care and a UBI in place and most of this can go away. These laws exist to get men to pay so they can give more bailouts to large corporations and provide more tax breaks instead. If more of the tax dollars from the people went to people and the people at the top had to actually pay taxes instead of politicians this is probably more feasible.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 04:30 PM
2

1+3=4 2+2=4 Equal but not the same. It shouldn't be about trying to be the same, it's about looking at our individual issues and seeking relevant improvement.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 03:07 PM
15

Ah but have you considered the profits of the privately owned prisons? https://mkorostoff.github.io/incarceration-in-real-numbers/ For the States this is a great little tool.
/r/MensRights14/03/23 02:23 AM
1

My thoughts mostly boil down to that this person also likely believes there's a real wage gap, women make 78 cents to a mans dollar. If a man who is cohabitating with a woman is only making 28% of that household income that would mean that men who do not live with woman are the richest demography by an incredibly large margin to cover this loss. That or based on the brackets in your post, maybe getting married boosts your earning potential a ton. Getting married might have been the secret to gre…
/r/MensRights13/03/23 03:43 AM
4

You said someone specified 72%, do you have their source? I would be interested in first validating this as that number is pretty specific, there should be data attached to it. One about data is you need to look into who is funding it(their interests) and see how the data may be getting misrepresented to further their interests. Assuming this stat wasn't just whipped out of their ass. It's also interesting that you said income, that would imply when men and women live together, the men are earni…
/r/MensRights12/03/23 08:33 PM
0

I would disagree with the need to hit a small child. There are 0 times I should need to strike a small child in order to convince them to act civil. I would have already failed as a parent for it to get to that point, there are just other tools that you should have and devolving to striking a child doesn't teach them how to act civil, it teaches that violence can be civil. Violence isn't a good corrector for kids because when you're dealing in violence you're not dealing inside social norms and …
/r/MensRights12/03/23 06:12 PM
-4

No that's not what I said, I said the amount of force you should need to respond to someone with isn't by applying the same percentage of effort as them, it's by applying what is needed to restrain that person.
/r/MensRights12/03/23 04:53 AM
21

This is the same logic where a woman can hit a man in public and it's shrugged off while a man who hits back to defend himself is liable to get jumped regardless. In defence of the downvoted guy, I personally support this action in principle, once all of the social expectations are dropped and there's danger it's basically instinctual for us to just know that in most cases a man is going to be able to beat a woman and 0 affirmative action is going change that. It's just harder to beat up most me…
/r/MensRights11/03/23 03:34 PM
1

PJs, basically every girl I've ever met loves wearing PJs around the house but they don't keep it on when they leave because that's not fashionable. Call it a trick but if you're never seeing the booty short style of PJs is may just mean women find your house is cold. Or you date girls that just don't buy them.
/r/MensRights02/03/23 07:56 PM
9

You toss on a pair and go for a walk, it probably seems uncomfortable to that person because it's uncomfortable. You're making the assumption that some women are not going against their personal judgments in order to wear what is being perceived as fashionable. People sometimes go against what they want because they feel they either have an obligation to act a certain way or that society expects it. Women, like men, are not hiveminds and there's a ton of different reasons people might do somethi…
/r/MensRights02/03/23 05:34 PM
7

Yea, so effectively both sides don't like you because you're not treating them like real people with real thoughts and feelings and ascribing no real expectations on them. Women are people, people deserve to be both seriously listened to but also given fair expectations.
/r/MensRights18/02/23 02:35 PM
10

This doesn't fix much imo. People will still condemn the accused and after being found innocent it's something that can still follow them socially. The women who suggest this could discourage real reports also have a point. The problem is the way society teaches to condemn the defendant in this case, this is a bandaid to make you feel better about that, maybe in time this bandaid could shift opinion but I doubt it.
/r/MensRights18/02/23 02:18 PM
7

Refugee, she fled a terrible situation in order to seek refuge. It's a small point but North and South Korea are still 1 country at civil war. As soon as she arrived in South Korea she's granted citizenship as both side still consider the other Korea. You dont have to defect to flee North Korea just get to a country that'll let to pick what Korea they'll extradite you back to for this to work. (The above is also why there was a deal made out of both Koreas going to Olympics(iirc) under the same …
/r/MensRights14/02/23 05:54 PM
1

OP, you seem like the asshole and this is a case of "talk shit, get hit" by the sounds of it she likely was up front about it. She was your friend and had no real obligation to disclose her sexual situation to you until it became obvious she should. You then insulted her, she is likely pissed because she thought you were actually being a friend and it sounds like you instead presented yourself as one of the guys who is only friends while you're waiting for a chance to get with her. I can't sugge…
/r/MensRights14/02/23 05:34 PM
17

The solution as I know it is a good male friend group. Women want to know you have emotions but they don't want to be dealing with them, your good friends are the people that I've found help you deal with them and in turn you be there for them.
/r/MensRights23/01/23 05:56 PM
6

Well if they're going to have the baby and you felt inclined just taking the role of the baby's father isn't off the table. Would you'd propose we force an abortion as a one party consent? I don't think we should be winning the right to control medical abortion, getting the legal option is the most realistically fair part where you might someday find a win for men if you're talking about fairness of options in being able to dictate your future. This still isn't exactly "fair" getting a medical a…
/r/MensRights13/12/22 02:03 AM
20

"a father of that child I believe should co-sign on an abortion. I might want that child even if she does not. Who says I don't have weak semen (I don't. I have 2 kids lol)? This might be MY one chance at a miracle as well. She can sign her rights away. If 2 consenting adults willingly lay down together BOTH not using condoms (women have them as well 🙄) and they knowingly fuck. They are both consenting to a pregnancy risk. They should both have to consent to end it. It's not my fault God or whoe…
/r/MensRights13/12/22 12:09 AM
22

The situation isnt equal, that's not the nature of what we're talking about. If we're talking about fair the way I see this you either need to support both feet in or out. A. You think that both parties should be allowed to choose to abort the pregnancy or not. If the woman decides to abort the mans decision is a moot point because the nature of allowing both parties to make the choice just ends up like that. B. Both parties should be allowed to maintain the pregnancy. The man can be forced into…
/r/MensRights12/12/22 11:15 PM
29

You not paying child support is a paper abortion, I edited my post slightly but given the context of the question I would suggest it's more fair to support the chance for both parties to opt out and at the same time neither party can force the other to opt in. Men wanting to keep kids is a weird game, we don't have the pregnancy so it's a hard sell to me that we can dictate that.
/r/MensRights12/12/22 10:39 PM
31

If we could hold up here for a few, if in your comparision we're going to give birth to a house you have a point, it's not really the same experience and a poor relationship to make. I'm all for paper abortion as a man who doesn't want other men forced into situations, everyone should get an opt out, but under no circumstance would I suggest a woman should have to go through an entire pregnancy, I'm pro choice for everybody and I'd definitely disagree with forcing pregnancy onto someone who does…
/r/MensRights12/12/22 10:34 PM
0

If you want to be a good defender you pick up a combative martial art, not weights, weights just make you look like you can fight. You can actually get bulky and less dexterous and you're going to be worse as fighting because you're lugging around useless weight. I will admit in your defense.
/r/MensRights07/12/22 01:24 AM
20

Sometimes it's also as simple as these people are lazy, by putting in the effort and improving yourself you become a walking billboard that disproves their rhetoric of "healthy at every size" or whatever bullshit they're trying to peddle that isn't repetition and hard work. If someone who is obese is trying to sell you on the idea they're healthy the last thing they need is entire buildings full of people whose body is in direct opposition to that message. Pull you down because they're not climb…
/r/MensRights06/12/22 10:15 PM
1

You made your point about not being ambiguous because it seems like you missed the point completely. I'm also downvoting your reply because you're making it appear as if you making a whole new point and you're not, you just didn't catch the exact same point that I had made and appear to be restating my point. All zorks are assholes. (Statement to pretend is true) Some zubats are zorks. (Statement to pretend is true) Would you call all zubats assholes? (A question, not a statement of fact, this h…
/r/MensRights05/12/22 02:46 PM
1

You were supposed to come to the conclusion that only some zubats are asshole, that was the point. ​ I was also suggesting that not all women are manipulative, some are, I just used that as a phrase because it's a common enough toxic complaint I've heard. You actually just read what I posted and came to the wrong conclusion about my assumption but at least you got the right answer so good job there I guess.
/r/MensRights04/12/22 09:11 PM
-1

Hate to do it but in terms of pretty basic reasoning. All zorks are assholes. Some zubats are zorks. Would you call all zubats assholes? ​ Same idea as suggesting that all women are emotional manipulators just because some are. Bad generalization only fuels the extremes and creates conflict.
/r/MensRights04/12/22 05:15 PM
2

Size means less with untrained fighters, with trained fighters size makes a very clear difference. Weight class sports exist to protect trained fighters from other trained fighters, not randoms on the street. In real life Bruce Lee would have been skilled vs most of us but you put someone like Cain Velasquez or Mike Tyson in front of him and he loses handily every time.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 08:42 PM
9

Yea but you need both parts, they lack responsibility because they can't be expected to understand the potential results of this action but men can? I'm with the other guy, I don't get how this point is even supposed to reflect positively on them, I would have assumed it insulting.
/r/MensRights29/11/22 03:30 AM
1

For me, yes to pro-choice and yes to paper-abortions. The libertarian in me wants to empower people, the ability for all parties to have a choice is the means. In my ideal world there's also a UBI, housing first, and free healthcare so the father choosing not to take part shouldn't have nearly the same potential impact.
/r/MensRights25/11/22 10:25 PM
4

I learned how to cook from my mom and dad. My dad is a red seal chef, it's probably coming out better if I do it anyway.
/r/MensRights25/11/22 05:27 PM
1

I might suggest that you can't advocate for both is exactly extremism agenda, if it's a choice between hot or cold you become the enemy by pick the opposite and they want to elevate up by pushing down, it's a bad game. You can absolutely side in the warm middle and reasonably pull for both because the goals of "fairness for men" and "fairness for women" are not mutually exclusive, we need more people willing to sit in the warm water and reasonably advocate for both. This shouldn't be rope that n…
/r/MensRights24/11/22 10:28 PM
3

It's a label used to put negative association to women who have male dominated hobbies or has good male friends and also doesn't actively support their version of feminism. There is no positive context to how certain groups of people use this, it's meant as notice you are doing something wrong to them. You're being told they think a system is manipulating you because they can't understand why you're not like them. There's no reason not to be a feminist, I support feminism in the sense that I hav…
/r/MensRights24/11/22 10:00 PM
58

I heard a pretty good 3 point argument for this. Men are expected to take the initiative in social engagements but most are not given guidance or taught what exactly that means. Men are emotionally neglected, the current social climate completely discredits mens feelings. Sexism is rampant against men, from the prison system or divorce courts. In many cases people use white men as a social reference point to punch at. Other minorities have a card to pull to express their feelings of opposition a…
/r/MensRights24/11/22 07:42 PM
1

The original religions were likely just people explaining the unexplainable, it was also just convenient for the elite to twist that desire to understand into a means of control.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 08:10 PM
1

Would be better to just say "control people" and not just women imo. I think in most religions it's also fair to say women do take the brunt of it on average but it's still a force used to devide and control people in general.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 07:32 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter