TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

UncleEggma Archive

View 0 posts and 10 comments by UncleEggma on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I think a person going into a relationship may likely be called on to invest money. How that dynamic works out is totally up to the individuals involved. That's not analogous to purchasing a car.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 02:21 PM
1

You expect people to accurately remember rapes that happened over 20 years ago? Stop trying to muddy reality. It's not >20 years ago vs. <1 year go. It's within the last year vs. within a person's lifetime. Do you smoke so much weed that you wouldn't be able to remember getting raped? It's not a difficult thing to recall yes or no for. OF COURSE I'm going to trust the data set that offers more data. It's called a trend - something that is much fuzzier with LESS data - like only a year's worth. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/16 04:27 AM
0

And again I'm convinced that, if not all red pill people, you as an individual don't see why analogies like the one you've chosen to use do not follow from that "logic and reason" platform you like to proselytize from. Analogies like the one you've posited are nice, cheap little tools that are exceedingly over-utilized to the point of obfuscation. If you are struggling to see how scrutinizing a used car is so thickly different from learning about another person's sexual past, maybe you ought to …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/16 04:06 AM
3

You're lying. Women who experienced completed forced penetration: 14,617,000 Men who were made to penetrate: 5,451,000
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/16 07:15 PM
5

So, when we discuss assessing a woman's mate value I guess this circles back to my original point. You brought up the idea of "mate value" all on your own. The original commenter was merely talking about not judging people based on their sexual past. It had nothing to do with determining whether or not a particular person would have "mate value" to you or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/16 03:11 PM
2

All fine and good. But that doesn't mean the world has to revolve around your standard of how much sex is OK and how many partners are OK. I'm sure you know that, not trying to be condescending. I think the way you used the word 'judge' just comes off as a little conceited.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/16 02:42 PM
4

To be fair I didn't read all the OP. I don't know the answers to your questions. It's probably a mixture of some of the things you said and then some. What I find interesting is what you say here: Some societal construct that's built sex into this incredibly important thing (even though modern society insists that sex is unimportant, recreational, and doesn't use up, lose, or give up anything)? Sex by its nature is an incredibly important and societally ingrained interaction. Sex is an interacti…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/16 02:37 PM
7

I can't help but notice RP people gravitate toward economic/material analogies at every turn. A car is an object you buy for money. A person is not.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/16 02:18 PM
5

You're arguing against something the previous commenter did not say. If you have qualms with people that have had a lot of sexual partners because that's not something you're that into, fine. You don't need to say anything at all and you can take that qualm into consideration as you might any that makes you consider not wanting to 'be with' that person. A person's sex past is their own business, and you looking down on them for it is indicative of your character flaws far more than theirs. If yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/16 02:14 PM
4

The reason rape is bad has nothing to do with economics.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/16 02:06 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter