TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Uncletime Archive

View 0 posts and 73 comments by Uncletime on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

America lost this election regardless of the outcome
/r/MensRights22/11/16 01:23 PM
1

"Away from you"
/r/MensRights28/10/16 09:57 PM
1

You'd be surprised, depending on the shrink conversation can cover literally anything
/r/MensRights28/09/16 11:00 PM
3

However [political parties] may now and then answer popular ends, they are likely in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion. George Washington called this shit
/r/MensRights27/09/16 02:10 PM
1

I agree on all those points except trump being better. Without him ever having held any office we can't say how he behaves in power. Plus he has shown many times to be belligerent and aggressive, further (going of my finicial analyst brothers wirds) he is a shitty businessman. I personally am voting third party unless the stats indicate that it is impossible as of the day of elections .
/r/MensRights10/09/16 12:47 PM
1

"However [political parties] may now and then answer popular ends, they are likely in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion." George Washington
/r/MensRights10/09/16 01:45 AM
-3

Being a criminal doesn't prevent one from doing a good job in the president's office. Nixon, though a criminal and liar, did manage some good things in office. I haven't decided who to vote for yet but I have higher hopes for a power hungry criminal than an aggressive fool.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 01:43 AM
2

Anecdotal here. As a fellow Michigandar, I agree. As a Michigandar with 2 friends whose fathers are family court judges, I've heard lighter sentences for worse stuff from the source.
/r/MensRights25/08/16 07:02 PM
4

Well since you've got one anecdote that MUST mean it's true that women are more sexual than men. That was the assholey part. The one that I replied to. Not the original fair comment
/r/MensRights25/08/16 06:52 PM
5

And I agree that proper, non-anecdotal evidence is needed. But the manner in which you asked it was kinda assholey. All I am saying is that being tactful or polite gets better responses than being a sarcastic asshole.
/r/MensRights25/08/16 06:20 PM
5

Rudeness is the manner in which one acts not the nature of one's correctness or incorrectness and based on the text you typed and the capitalization and other conveyances of meaning in text, you phrased yourself rudely. A simple, "anecdotal evidence doesn't really prove anything" would have made the same point without making an ass of yourself.
/r/MensRights25/08/16 04:24 PM
4

I understanding disagreeing, anecdotes aren't proper evidence, but why be rude?
/r/MensRights25/08/16 03:51 PM
3

Thank you for your polite entry to this discourse and for providing dissenting statistics to the general opinion here. My only to critiques to the data being that their usage of the labor bureau is data that only stats workers and pay but doesn't include hours thus limiting accuracy of a gap. My second critique being that they only use data from feminists which, without in depth examining of each source study, leads me to believe their is bias, intended or unintended, in the article. Sorry for t…
/r/MensRights25/08/16 03:34 PM
2

I'll confess I have never heard nor seen any stats on that care to cite a source?
/r/MensRights25/08/16 07:04 AM
1

I dunno they might just might be filthy heathens
/r/MensRights24/08/16 09:26 AM
4

You do realize the article you linked to is about racial stuff not gender stuff right? Feminism and Men's rights, while my be involved in those issues, are inherently focused on gendered issues due to their origins as movements about the issues they believe their respective genders face. Further if you where to look at who suffers the most at the hands of corrupt officers, it is black men. Thus this issue would be more relevant to men's rights and thus MRAs rather than it being relevant to women…
/r/MensRights23/08/16 05:26 AM
1

I'll offer you a better one femanist. It's subtle yet powerful and not vulgar and childish.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 04:16 AM
2

Ultimately I think we probably have enough safeguards in place where one tired old hag can't end the world as we know it, but you raise a good point.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 03:51 PM
1

True I forget that so there is a precedent thanks
/r/MensRights22/08/16 03:48 PM
2

I think neither of them would actually nuke, I think Hillary's stupid action would be something Nixon esque, while Trump would declare war without proper reason and illegally (cause presidents aren't supposed to be able to declare war).
/r/MensRights22/08/16 05:00 AM
1

Just gonna point out as a former dedicated distance runner, I and all of my team mates ran shirtless in short shorts. It is an enormous comfort difference that helps when going for runs in the summer. It isn't just vain posers.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 04:57 AM
5

You do realize that there aren't just two candidates right? It's the beauty of freedom, you don't have to choose someone you don't like. Even if third party hasn't won before you can still vote for them in hope of a first or to bring to the mainstream the issues they support.
/r/MensRights21/08/16 04:47 PM
1

Actually I find trump more likely to nuke than hillary. She is run by corporations and nuclear apocalypse is bad for business.
/r/MensRights21/08/16 04:33 PM
3

I would first look into getting her help with her sociopathic tendencies lest she attempt to destroy more lives
/r/MensRights18/08/16 07:43 PM
1

No as in keep the dicks out of their pants.
/r/MensRights16/08/16 12:25 PM
2

Technically they need to keep it out of their pants.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 01:35 PM
2

Last that I paid you can get a safe abortion for under a grand so...
/r/MensRights14/08/16 09:28 PM
1

More importantly the teaching style could be catered to the gender attending to produce better individuals.
/r/MensRights13/08/16 05:24 PM
1

A 'good' politician says whatever it takes to get in, after that lord only knows whether they will actually do any of what they promise.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 01:58 PM
4

If we are going for clarity: Male victims of rape would be best.
/r/MensRights04/06/16 08:08 PM
2

Nah she needs to upgrade it to one tall cup of shut the fuck up
/r/MensRights23/03/16 09:37 PM
1

I think sub five is in the top 5% of the world
/r/MensRights22/03/16 05:59 PM
1

Well as a former distance runner my previous pr for the same distance at age 14 was 9:58. For reference
/r/MensRights22/03/16 05:06 PM
2

The poop hole is the loophole
/r/MensRights18/03/16 07:47 PM
3

Basically every race mass murders.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 03:34 AM
5

What I assume op is trying to say is mom doesn't care that her son wants to be with dad and is using the law to force her teenage son to be with her. Thus she is a pos for blatantly taking away her son's freedom
/r/MensRights24/12/15 05:29 AM
5

I can't help with legal stuff, but for the cocaine recovery I strongly recommend get professional assistance with that. The affect of cocaine on the brain can last a long time and can even be permanent. While it is possible to get clean on your own, you will dramatically increase your chances for success with a pro. Also take what I say with a grain of salt since I am only a biomedical engineer undergrad
/r/MensRights13/12/15 05:24 AM
41

And ignoring that men aren't a species because fuck scientific accuracy
/r/MensRights23/11/15 05:06 AM
12

From my experience universities focusing in engineering and other stem disiplines tend to be good, but it is slowly changing as the old administration gets replaced with people from my failure of a generation.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 05:02 AM
2

Up to my knowledge profiling isn't illegal in the US
/r/MensRights21/11/15 12:52 AM
3

I think the charge is vehicular manslaughter to be exact
/r/MensRights21/11/15 12:39 AM
1

CalTech, Rose-Hulman, U of M Ann Arbor engineering, any other big name non subjective department l.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 07:41 PM
1

If I may way in, when referring to cancer research funding, it normally isn't being looked at on an individual level but on a large scale. As such, it cannot and should not be defined by any one individuals ethical code. As it is on such a large scale, it falls more into the greater good area. And what provides a greater societal good? 3 years of extra life or 30?
/r/MensRights14/11/15 02:01 AM
0

I'll say this, a man who volunteers to serve isn't a victim but a casualty a victim would be a person forced into war.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 06:00 PM
3

'MURICA, FUCK YEAH
/r/MensRights08/11/15 06:44 PM
2

Horseshoe theory
/r/MensRights04/11/15 04:49 PM
2

My parents not giving me everything I want whenever is sociopathic? When I was a kid a was clothed well fed well and supported well.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 07:15 AM
6

On that note I couldn't tell you. I would hope that the director just doesn't use reddit and did know about trp and made an unfortunate title choice but who knows
/r/MensRights01/11/15 09:47 PM
22

The red pill is a reference to a scene from the matrix where morpheaus offers neo a red or a blue pill. The red shows the harsh true reality while the blue is to live a happy lie
/r/MensRights01/11/15 08:28 PM
1

So this isn't to demean the article but if the author wishes to criticize another on spelling then the article better have damn near perfect spelling. I fully agree with the article but if your up against ideologues it's best not to give them even a nanometer of ground.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 06:03 PM
3

A fallacy means that the argument doesn't prove the outcome. Sure slippery slopes happen but arguing by slippery slope doesn't prove anything unless you provide grounds for each step on the slope
/r/MensRights01/11/15 12:18 AM
1

As a college student it isn't us who are rich it's our parents. I think you mean spoiled instead.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 12:12 AM
6

But some are stupid enough to think they can hit and quit crazies safely
/r/MensRights31/10/15 11:24 PM
1

A good friend of mine's father is a family court judge and even he admits he and many of his colleagues can be and often are quite biased in regards to custody
/r/MensRights31/10/15 11:20 PM
6

I would advise you to look up masochism
/r/MensRights28/10/15 09:41 PM
1

I'll put my money on the schnauzer thing happening first
/r/MensRights26/10/15 06:28 PM
1

Pc principal went and became Pc pm
/r/MensRights24/10/15 02:57 AM
1

There are no tradition that predate humanity and humanity sure as duck isn't 65 mil
/r/TheRedPill20/10/15 07:08 PM
5

As they say, "an eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind".
/r/MensRights19/10/15 05:28 AM
19

The notion that equality should be equal outcomes not equal opportunities is one of the most disgusting facets of my generations sjw/feminist/crackpot types
/r/MensRights13/10/15 10:50 PM
2

Can't be proved wrong if you are too stupid to know what wrong means
/r/MensRights11/10/15 06:30 PM
2

HIV can be passed from mother to child so there is that to consider.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 06:02 PM
4

What about the 600k she already has in investment in her name from it. Or the fact she is asking for child support from someone who doesn't have the ability to support themselves? The reason you are, will, and should be down voted is because you've ignored what makes this act truly deplorable.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 07:20 PM
8

You might want to reread the article. It says she to about another 600k into investment in her name
/r/MensRights21/09/15 06:36 PM
2

We should also try to include median since outliers have less of an effect on it
/r/MensRights12/09/15 08:53 PM
2

Unless you're fat
/r/MensRights21/08/15 12:04 AM
1

Countersuit for libel demanding they pay both sets of legal fees
/r/MensRights20/08/15 09:54 PM
0

And this is why you shouldn't stick your dick in crazy
/r/MensRights18/08/15 06:18 PM
1

True but you did choose to make a debate of it
/r/MensRights16/08/15 05:05 PM
0

I could be wrong but this is men's rights not economic debate time
/r/MensRights16/08/15 04:53 PM
1

Well put in charge of legislation
/r/MensRights15/08/15 04:00 AM
1

No the anecdotes you provided were the small sample sorry for the lack of clarity
/r/MensRights09/08/15 03:00 AM
0

Third party here, strawman fallacies can generally be seen as a misrepresentation of a particular viewpoint. So basically in your case a small sample is being used to describe a large movement thus strawman
/r/MensRights08/08/15 07:35 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter